Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LANGUAGE
ARCHITECTURE DEPARTEMENT
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH SUMATERA
2023
1
PREFACE
Praise be to God Almighty for the blessings of his grace, and that we were given the
opportunity to be able to compile a working paper entitled " degrees of comparison in english
language” is properly and correctly, and on time. This paper is structured so that readers can
know how important application of degrees of comparison in English language in daily life . and
because the aid and help of God Almighty, these papers can be finally resolved.
We also thanked to our lecture in English subject who have many professors help
compilers in order to complete this paper. Hopefully this paper can give a broader insight to the
reader, although this paper has advantages and disadvantages. Thank youu.
Group 1 class A
25 September 2023
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PREFACE........................................................................................................................................2
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................3
CHAPTER I....................................................................................................................................4
1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER II...................................................................................................................................5
1. CONCLUSION..................................................................................................................13
CHAPTER IV................................................................................................................................15
REVERENCES.............................................................................................................................15
3
CHAPTER 1
1. INTRODUCTION
4
CHAPTER II
A) Positive
Positive degree is the most basic form of the adjective, positive because it does not
relate to any superior or inferior qualities of other things. Positive refers to the quality of one
person or thing. It is simply the adjective form. Positive also used to compare two nouns or
verbs that are equal or almost equal (equality). On the other hand, we can use as + adjective
+ as for comparing two persons or things that have the similarity of quality or quantity.
For example:
My parents is as old as my lucture
For negative comparison, to talk about two things that is different in some way, we
use ‘not +as + adjective + as’.
5
For example:
Burj Khalifa is not as tall as Eiffel Tower.
B). Comparative.
The comparative degree denotes a greater amount of a quality relative to something
else. The phrase ‘Anna is taller than her father’ means that Anna’s degree of tallness is
greater than her father’s degree of tallness. R.W. Zandvoort and J. A. Van Ek said in their
book ‘The comparative is used when one object or group is compared with another and
separate object or group. Comparative degree is used to compare two person, places or
things.
Example:
Eiffel Tower is taller than Tower of Pisa.
C). Superlative
Superlative degree is used to stress the highest degree of quality for more than two
objects compared. It is the highest or lowest degree of quality when more than two persons
or things are compared. The superlative is used to compare one member of a group with the
whole group (including that member).
For example:
Bob is the tallest boy in the club.
These bags are the most expensive of all.
When the positive ends in mute final e, is dropped before adding just add –r and –st, see
in the table bellow:
Adjectives of One Syllable End s with an e Just Add -r
6
Adjective Comparative Superlative
When the positive ends in le, the mute e before the suffix is dropped. See in the table
bellow:
Adjective Ends with le Just Add –r
When the positive ends in y preceded by a consonant, the y is changed to i before the
suffix. Shy and sly may retain the y, see in the table bellow:
Adjective One Syllable End in y is Changes to
7
More, most with short adjectives
Adjectives Ending in -ed, -ing, -re, -ful, -ous use more and most
Adjective Comparative Superlative
8
(2) And those with the strees on the second syllable add er and est to the positive degree, see in
the table bellow:
(3) If the two syllable adjective ends with -y, change the y to i add -er for the comparative form,
see in the table bellow:
But in British English shy, sly, spry, wry normally keep the –y: shy, shyer, shyest, etc. (in
American English it is generally changed to –i). Furthermore, another two syllables adjectives
can use both –er, -est or more, most to form comparative or superlative sentences.
(4). Two syllables adjective that follow two rule. These adjectives can be used with er and est or
more and most, see in the table bellow:
9
More clever Most clever
But exceptions to these rules occur, such as eager, proper, etc. which take more or most
before them. All of these rules can cause confusion in using comparison. A good rule to keep in
mind, however, is that more, most may actually be used with all two syllables adjectives except
for those ending in –y and –i just mentioned above. In addition, it is significant to memorize that
two forms of comparison never occur together; a form like more dirtier would be ungrammatical.
Some adjective have irregular comparative and superlative form, see in the table bellow:
Irregular Comparison
Adjective Comparative Superlative
10
11
Little Less Least
In informal usage, further is often used instead of farther to compare distance, and in all
contexts older is frequently used to refer to a sibling of greater age.
In addition, the comparatives former, inner, nether, outer, upper, (utter) cannot be said to
correspond to any positive forms, and three are no corresponding regular superlatives. These
comparatives are used only to express contrast, not degree: a formerengagement (as against
later), an inner/outer wall, the netherlip (nether was formerly the opposite of upper), upper lip
(as against under, lower lip).
With adverb of two or more syllables we form the comparative and superlative by putting
more and most before the positive form, just as adjectives have comparison, adverbs follow the
same general rules for comparisons as adjective.
Adverb that have the same form as adjectives and others have comparatives and superlatives
with -er and -est. The most common are: fast, early, late, hard, long, near, high, low, soon, well,
(better, best), badly (worse, worst), and informal English easy, slow, loud and quick. and in
linguistic.
By adding -er or -est to an adverb containing one syllable, by using more or most (or less or
least) with an adverb ending in -ly or containing more than one syllable, and by completely
changing the form of the adverb see in the table bellow:
12
Slowly More slowly Most slowly
13
CHAPTER III
1. CONCLUSION
Comparison is used to express similarities or differences of degree or extent. Comparison is
the process of comparing people, things, or places through the level of quality, quantity, or
relation. Comparison is the method by which an adjective or adverb expresses a greeter or less
degree of the same quality. There are three kinds of adjective comparison; they are positive,
comparative and superlative. For the form of degrees of comparison there are two forms. They
are form of adverb comparison and form adverb comparison
Anna: Hey Jake! I just got back from the mall and saw they've opened a new coffee shop.
Jake: Oh, really? Is it bigger than the one we usually go to
Anna: Yes, it's definitely larger and seems to have a wide range of coffee options. But the old
one is still closer to my house.
Jake: I've heard their cold brew is stronger than most places. Did you try it?
Anna:I did! And you're right. It's certainly stronger and gave me a quicker caffeine kick.
Though, I still think our regular spot has a cozier ambiance.
Jake : I guess we can give it a try next time. Sometimes, a newer place can offer a better
experience.
Anna : Agreed. Change can be good. We might find it more enjoyable than we expect!
PARAGRAPH OF ARCHITECTURE
In the realm of architecture, skyscrapers stand as the tallest edifices, piercing the city
skylines and embodying the pinnacle of human engineering. While mid-rise buildings might be
more versatile in terms of blending with urban landscapes, bungalows offer a closer connection
to the ground and often a more intimate residential experience. Yet, when we compare historical
sites to modern structures, the former often possess a deeper cultural significance, revealing
layers of history and tales of yesteryears, while the latter showcase advanced technology and
contemporary design paradigms. Through these degrees of comparison, one can appreciate the
vast spectrum of architectural wonders and the diverse experiences they offer.
The Giza plateau was, in ancient times, geologically connected to the Moqattam hill on the other
side of the Nile (Gamal Hemdan, 1984) (fig.4), crossing the site of what is now the capital Cairo. The top
level of the Moqattam hill is now +200 m. The top level of the Giza plateau must have acquired a level
hypothetically close to the Moqattam surface level, i.e. +200 m, or so. The geological formation of both
sites, the Giza plateau and the Moqattam hill, is composed of a ”cretaceous nucleolus amid an iocenean
formation” (Gamal Hemdan, 1984), an action happened when ”Abu-Rawash concave cap mass was
transposed upside down in the late upper cretaceous, resulting in a solid cap well exposed on the
surface”. Amid that process, the site was formed as hill heights along with convexes of the vallies,
keeping an ”axis running from the eastern North to the western South”. That axis almost coincides with
the axis connecting the centers of gravity of the three pyramids. ”The iocenean formation of the site is
mainly composed of two strata, one higher and one lower. The lower stratum is identified as denser and
more homogeneous.” And so far, the Nile valley bisected, after the ancient changes, that formation,
one on its east and the other on its west, forming two heights overlooking it. The elevations of both sites
must have stayed the same, or at least relatively the same. Here starts the hypothesis of the site
management and the system of constructing the pyramids on the plateau.
One fact about Herodotus is that ”He is candid about acknowledging ignorance, and when
versions differ he gives both”(Herodotus, 2016). We know that ”facts” he mentioned in his books were
after different talks and hearsays he listened were not from authorities, by the meanings we know now.
So far we have to be critical to his suggestions. But one fact should be considered as a start in the
research, that is the stones that constitute the main body of the pyramid were of the local site (Ahmad
Fakhry, n.d.).
For a huge edifice as this, having around two and half million units of stones, structurally well
spread and efficiently piled in layers to support their existence and resilience to time, an effective
suitable and well thought of management must have been executed. Here another hypothesis might be
consi.
15
CHAPTER 4
1. REFERENCES
Brown, H. Douglas. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, 5th edition, New York:
Pearson Education, 2006.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degrees_of_comparison
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/adjectives.htm.
Mahmud, Nasrun, English for Muslim University Students 6th Edition, Jakarta: Siwi bakti
Darma Press, 2010.
Parrot, Martin, Grammar for English Language Teachers, USA: Cambridge University
Press, 2000.
Pierson, Ruth and Vik, Susan, Making Sense in English Grammar in Context, Boston:
Addison Wesley Publishing Company, 1987. Swan, Michael, Practical English Usage,
Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1980.
16