CODE DUW10022 SESSION I: 2022/2023

COURSE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT CASE STUDY 2
CLO 2 Initiates incident hazards, risks, and safe work practices to TOTAL 60/60
maintain health and safe work environment. (A3, PLO8) MARKS

PLO 8 Understand and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities

and norms of technician practice

STUDENT’S REGISTRATION
NAME NUMBER

INSTRUCTIONS:

CLO2 a. Form a group and complete the task given. Your team may use any resource of information
A3 available.
You have been assigned to carry out a study on the implementation of fire safety systems in
practice at the PSMZA workshop or laboratory. Is the implementation of a fire safety system in
accordance with standard procedures? Explain the improvements needed to ensure that the
fire safety system is functioning properly and effectively.

b. Writing format
Font: Times New Roman
Size: 12
Line Spacing: Single
Paper: A4 Size
Binding: Combining / book binding

c. Content of the Report

1 Abstract 2M
2 Introduction 3M
3 Statement of problem 3M
4 Study Objective 3M
5 Scope of Study 3M
6 Finding 10 M
7 Diagram 10 M
8 Discussion & Suggestion 5M&5M
9 Conclusion 5M
10 References / Bibliography 5M
11 Format 3M
12 Commitment 3M
TOTAL 60 M
Case Study Rubric For:
CODE DUW10022 SESSION I: 2022/2023
COURSE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH FOR ENGINEERING ASSESSMENT CASE STUDY 2
CLO 2 Initiates incident hazards, risks, and safe work practices to maintain health and safe work TOTAL MARKS 60/60
environment. (A3, PLO8)
PLO 8 Understand and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of technician
practice

1 Abstract
2 Introduction
3 Statement of
problem
4 Study Objective
5 Scope of Study
6 Finding
7 Diagram
8 Discussion &
Suggestion
9 Conclusion
2M Abstract not included. (0)
3M Introduction not related in case
study issues. (1)
3M Identifies statement of problem and
acceptable understanding in the
case study. (1)
3M Identifies of objective and
acceptable understanding of some
of the objective in the case study. (1)
3M Identifies scope of study and
acceptable understanding in the
case study. (1)
10 M Presents a superficial or incomplete
analysis of some of the identified
issues. (1-3)
10 M Does not include Diagram (0)
5M Little or no action suggested and/or
inappropriate solutions proposed to
the issues in the case study. (0-1)
5M Little or no action suggested and/or
inappropriate solutions proposed to
the issues in the case study. (0-1)
5M No conclusion included conclusion
completely inconsistent with results
or main purpose. (0-1)
Incomplete the main purpose, methods, results,
conclusion. (1)
Introduction not complete (1-2)
Identifies statement of problem and
demonstrates an accomplished understanding in
the case study. (2)
Identifies of study objective and demonstrates an
accomplished understanding of most of the
objective. (2)
Identifies scope of study and demonstrates an
accomplished understanding in the case study. (2)
Presents a thorough analysis of most of the issues
identified: missing some necessary issues. (4-7)
Includes one to five Diagram (5)
Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited
reasoning and evidence; presents a somewhat
one-sided argument; demonstrates little
engagement with ideas presented. (2-3)
Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited
reasoning and evidence; presents a somewhat
one-sided argument; demonstrates little
engagement with ideas presented. (2-3)
Conclusion presented but not articulated clearly
or related to main purpose or results. (2-4)
Complete the main purpose, methods, results,
conclusion. (2)
Complete the introduction related in case study
issues. (3)
Complete identifies and understanding of the
statement of problem in the case study. (3)
Complete identifies and understanding of the
objective in the case study. (3)
Complete identifies and understanding of the
Scope of Study in the case study. (3)
Complete presents an insightful and thorough
analysis of all identified issues/problems. (7-10)
Select the exceeds the minimal five required
Diagram (6-10)
Expressed the supports diagnosis and opinions
with strong arguments and well documented
evidence; presents a balanced and critical view;
interpretation is both reasonable and objective.
(4-5)
Proposed the supports diagnosis and opinions
with strong arguments and well documented
evidence; presents a balanced and critical view;
interpretation is both reasonable and objective.
(4-5)
Proposed a logical conclusion is reached and is
related to the results and main purpose
provided. (5)
10 References / 5M Does not include references. (0) Includes one to five references (1-4) Select the exceeds the minimal five required
Bibliography references. (5)
11 Format 3M Not followed the format (0) Followed the format but not complete. (1-2) Completely followed the format. (3)
12 Commitment 3M No commitment. (1) Good commitment. (2) Act the Full commitment. (3)
TOTAL 60 M

Prepared by : Verified by :

(MOHD ZAHIR @ MOHD ZAID BIN ABDUL KADIR) (AHMAD NAZRUL BIN ALI@YUSOF)
Date: 01/09/2022 Date: 01/09/2022
AHMAD NAZRUL BIN ALI@YUSOF
Ketua Program Kejuruteraan Mekanikal
Jabatan Kejuruteraan Mekanikal
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi