The document is a rubric for assessing student summative work on whether the government meets the needs of its citizens. It evaluates students on personal opinion and position, personal statements supporting their opinion, supporting evidence, and speech format. A well-developed response clearly takes a positioned, explores various viewpoints, uses accurate evidence to reinforce arguments, and has a clear three-part structure. Weaker responses have limited or vague viewpoints, insufficient evidence, and lack focus or organization.
The document is a rubric for assessing student summative work on whether the government meets the needs of its citizens. It evaluates students on personal opinion and position, personal statements supporting their opinion, supporting evidence, and speech format. A well-developed response clearly takes a positioned, explores various viewpoints, uses accurate evidence to reinforce arguments, and has a clear three-part structure. Weaker responses have limited or vague viewpoints, insufficient evidence, and lack focus or organization.
The document is a rubric for assessing student summative work on whether the government meets the needs of its citizens. It evaluates students on personal opinion and position, personal statements supporting their opinion, supporting evidence, and speech format. A well-developed response clearly takes a positioned, explores various viewpoints, uses accurate evidence to reinforce arguments, and has a clear three-part structure. Weaker responses have limited or vague viewpoints, insufficient evidence, and lack focus or organization.
Summative Assessment: Does the Government Meet the Needs of its Citizens
Specific Tasks Criteria 4 3 2 1
Personal Opinion -The students understanding of -The students understanding of -The students understanding of -The students understanding of ● Students clearly select a position/opinion Structure of the structure is insightful and the structure is logical the structure is limited the structure is minimal on the issue presented clear Federal ● The student’s position/opinion clearly relates to the issue presented Government ● Opinion/response is clearly developed -The student explores various -The student explores various -The student explores various -The student explores various viewpoints, perspectives in a viewpoints, perspectives in a viewpoints, perspectives in a viewpoints, perspectives in an Personal Statements purposeful manner straightforward manner superficial manner abrupt manner ● Students establish three statements that support their opinion on the issue -The students choice of ● The statements are clearly connected to -The students choice of -The students choice of -The students choice of Thoughts on position is confused/ the student’s opinion/response position is sound position is appropriate position is vague/limited Effectiveness undeveloped ● Personal statements enhance the student’s opinion/response -The argument/ideas presented -The argument/ideas presented -The argument/ideas presented -The argument/ideas presented Supporting Evidence are convincing are predictable are imprecise and/or lacking are inaccurate/ overgeneralized ● Facts and information support the statements by the student -Evidence selected by the -The student has judiciously -The student has generally -The student has selected ● Facts and information selected are student, if present, is selected evidence pertinent to selected evidence pertinent to insufficient evidence unrelated accurate and based on the content ineffective and/or tangentially the issue the issue to the issue covered in class related to the issue ● Facts and information used to enhance the argument Evidence and -The student has haphazardly Thoughtfulness -The student has skilfully -The student has sufficiently -The student has inconsistently Format of Speech incorporated what evidence has incorporated the evidence to incorporated the evidence to incorporated the evidence ● Full structure is in place been chosen which does not reinforce arguments/ideas support arguments/ideas which reduces the merit of the ○ Three sections of the speech validate any arguments/ideas presented presented arguments/ideas presented ○ Easy to understand presented ○ You look good on camera -The response is functionally -The response is weakly -The response is largely -The response is effectively Format of Speech focused and fluently developed focused and logically focused and uncertainty unfocused and unclearly developed developed developed
(Kierkegaard Research - Sources, Reception and Resources 2) Katalin Nun, Jon Stewart (Eds.) - Kierkegaard and The Greek World. Tome II - Aristotle and Other Greek Authors-Routledge (2016)
(Advances in Experimental Philosophy) Daniel A. Wilkenfeld (Editor), Richard Samuels (Editor) - Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Science (2019, Bloomsbury USA Academic)