Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. INTRODUCTION
Just like humans, plants need nutrients to survive and thrive in harsh
environments. According to Huber and Wilhelm (1988), plant nutrition is an
important component of disease control. The capacity of host plants to continue
growing and/or producing in spite of infections serves as a proxy for their disease
tolerance.
That's why plant nutrients are divided based on the quantities required by
plants. Macronutrients are nutrients that plants require in large quantities. They are
composed of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, potassium, sulfur,
calcium, and magnesium. Micronutrients are nutrients that plants require in small
quantities. They are boron, manganese, copper, zinc, chloride, and
molybdenum. Iron is typically considered a micronutrient, meaning that plants
require it in small quantities. However, there are some cases where plants may
require more iron than is typical, and in these cases, iron can be considered a
macronutrient.
Plants get carbon from the air, hydrogen and oxygen from water, and
nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from the soil. One of the main constraints on
plant growth is the availability of nutrients in the soil. Plants won't be able to reach
their full potential in nutrient-deficient soil.
The three main nutrients that plants need are nitrogen, phosphorus, and
potassium.
Nitrogen is very important in the metabolic pathway of all plants. All vital
processes in plants are associated with protein, of which nitrogen is an essential
constituent. Unfortunately, it is the most lacking vital plant nutrient in the world.
Even though our atmosphere comprises 78% nitrogen in the form of gas, plants
don't have the enzymes to use it. That's why when N2 diffuses into the soil, different
II. OBJECTIVES
III. MATERIALS
Poly bags were employed for the potted mung beans, and a spray bottle
was utilized to administer nutrient solutions, including nitrogen and potassium. A
control group was established, which did not receive additional nutrients.
Watering the mung beans was done using a measuring cup, and their height was
measured with a measuring tape. To record observations and data collected
from the mung beans, a notebook and pen were used.
IV. PROCEDURES
To prepare the plants for the experiment, the potted mung bean plants
were initially divided into three distinct groups: the K-group (comprising K1, K2,
and K3), the N-group (consisting of N1, N2, and N3), and the control group (C1,
C2 and C3). Each of these groups received a different nutrient solution, except
for the control group. The mung bean plants were of similar size and were
positioned in a well-lit area to ensure they received adequate sunlight.
4
On its 4th day, it is noticeable that the
sprouts have significantly increased in
length compared to the previous days.
The cotyledons, which are the initial
seed leaves, appear to have
expanded and turned a slightly
deeper shade of green.
12
By day 12 of observing the growth of
mung beans, it continued to grow
taller, wherein control group remained
to have the tallest average plant high
(7 inches), while potassium group got
the lowest with an average height of
5.6 inches. And the leaves within each
set-up had developed even more,
with a lush and healthy appearance.
14
16
20
After two days of application of
fertilizers, it was observed that some of
the treated plants died, in contrast, the
control group remained healthy with
an average height of 7.7 inches. While
N-group and K-group received 4.3 and
2.3 respectively, due to the wilting of
plants after the application of the said
fertilizers.
22
Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day Day
0 2 4 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
N-1 0 1.4 3.8 4.5 5.8 6.1 6.1 6.2 6.5 6.8 7
K-3 0 1.1 4.2 5.6 6.1 6.5 6.6 6.8 6.8 7 7.3
7
Height of Monggo (inches)
0
Day 0 Day 2 Day 4 Day 8 Day 10 Day 12 Day 14 Day 16 Day 18 Day 20 Day 22
The figure shows the average height of mung beans over 22 days under different
treatments: the control group, the group treated with nitrogen, and the group
treated with potassium. The data is recorded at various time intervals, from Day 0
to Day 22, and the values represent the height of the mung beans in inches. The
control group started at a height of 0 on Day 0, which is the initial height of the
mung beans . Over the course of 22 days, the control group exhibited steady
growth, with the plants reaching an average height of 8.3 inches by Day 22. The
growth appeared to be relatively consistent with a slight increase over time. On
the other hand, the nitrogen-treated group also started at a height of 0 on Day 0.
Initially, the growth in this group was slightly faster compared to the control group,
reaching 1.4 inches by Day 2. However, after Day 2, the growth rate started to
slow down. And by Day 22, the plants in this group have an average height of 4.3
inches, which is the lowest among the three groups, since the mung beans under
this treatment started to wither, and eventually died by day 20, leading to the
decrease in the total average height of the plant.
Overall, it appeared that the control group showed the most consistent
and substantial growth over the 22-day period. The nitrogen and potassium
treatments initially seem to stimulate some growth, but this growth was not
sustained, and by the end of the observation period, both treated groups have
lower heights compared to the control group. These results suggested that, in this
experiment, neither nitrogen nor potassium had a positive long-term effect on the
growth of mung beans.
No.of Leaves
Day 0 Day 2 Day 4 Day 8 Day 10 Day 12 Day 14 Day 16 Day 18 Day 20 Day 22
Control 1 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 5
Control 2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Control 3 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 6
N-1 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 5
N-2 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2
N-3 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0
K-1 0 0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 0
K-2 0 0 2 2 2 2 3 3 4 5 5
K-3 0 0 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 6 8
4.5
3.5
3
No. of Leaves
2.5
1.5
0.5
0
Day 0 Day 2 Day 4 Day 8 Day 10 Day 12 Day 14 Day 16 Day 18 Day 20 Day 22
Day 2 Day 4 Day 8 Day 10 Day 12 Day 14 Day 16 Day 18 Day 20 Day 22
(w/ fertilizer)
Control Absence Absence Light Dark Light Light Yellow- Yellow-green Light Dark
1 of Leaf of Leaf green green green green green Green green
Control Absence Absence Dark Dark Dark Light Yellow- Yellow-green Yellow- Light
2 of Leaf of Leaf green green green green green green green
Control Absence Absence Light Dark Dark Light Yellow- Yellow-green Light Dark
3 of Leaf of Leaf green green green green green Green green
N-1 Absence Absence Light Dark Dark Light Yellow- Yellow-green Light Light
of Leaf of Leaf green green green green green Green green
N-2 Absence Absence Dark Dark Dark Dark Yellow- Yellow Light Light
of Leaf of Leaf green green green green green Green green
N-3 Absence Absence Dark Dark Dark Dark Yellow Yellow Absence Absence
of Leaf of Leaf green green green green of Leaf of Leaf
K-1 Absence Absence Light Dark Dark Dark Yellow- Yellow Absence Absence
of Leaf of Leaf green green green green green of Leaf of Leaf
K-2 Absence Absence Light Dark Dark Light Yellow Yellow Light Dark
of Leaf of Leaf green green green green Green green
K-3 Absence Absence Light Dark Dark Dark Yellow- Yellow Light Light
of Leaf of Leaf green green green green green Green green
From Day 8 to Day 14, variations in leaf color became apparent. The
Control and Nitrogen-treated groups showcased light green leaves, while the
Potassium-treated group displayed dark green leaves. These variations may be
attributed to the different amount of sunlight absorbed by the mung beans. As
we progress to Day 16 to Day 20, leaves continue to evolve in color, ranging from
light green to yellow-green in the Control and Nitrogen-treated groups. The
Potassium-treated group, however, exhibited a more diverse range of leaf colors,
including yellow-green and yellow, indicating differing responses to potassium
treatment.
On Day 22, leaf colors remained diverse across setups. The Control and
Nitrogen-treated groups maintained light green to dark green leaves, suggesting
ongoing leaf development. In contrast, the Potassium-treated group exhibited a
broader spectrum of leaf colors, encompassing dark green and light green.
Furthermore, some plants in the Potassium-treated and Nitrogen-treated group
had no leaves due to plant mortality, revealing variability in how mung beans
respond to the fertilizers.
The sample group consisted of Mung bean plants that were not given any
fertilizer in the control group. Comparing the growth and development of the
experimental groups to that of the control group allows researchers to determine
if the fertilizer has a significant effect or impact on plant growth. Without a control
group, it would be difficult to determine the actual effects (magnitude) of
nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on the plants, or whether the differences in
growth and development between the experimental and control groups are
simply due to chance. The control group also ensures fairness and impartiality in
conducting the experiment.
Nitrogen is very important in the metabolic pathway of all plants. All vital
processes in plants are associated with protein, of which nitrogen is an essential
constituent. Unfortunately, it is the most lacking vital plant nutrient in the world.
Even though our atmosphere comprises of 78% nitrogen in the form of gas, plants
don't have the enzymes to use it. That's why when N2 diffuses into the soil, different
bacterial species transform it into ammonium ions (NH4+) that plants may use.
4. What conclusions can you draw from the data you collected? Do your
results support the hypothesis that different nutrients impact plant growth
differently?
In conclusion, this study reveals that nitrogen and potassium can stimulate
growth in mung bean plants, however it is still important to take note that proper
amount of nutrients should be applied, since it can inflict potential harm, including
plant mortality. It is essential to carefully consider nutrient application strategies to
achieve optimal growth without compromising plant health. These results only
showed that nutrients can positively or negatively impact the growth of mung
beans, depending on the amount of fertilizer applied into it.
Some of the farms do soil tests to ascertain the nutritional status of their
garden or farm before applying fertilizer in crops. It allows farmers to determine
the nutrient levels in their soil and identify areas that need nutrients. An approach
called "integrated nutrient management" maximizes the utilization of nutrients in
agriculture while minimizing their harmful effects on the environment. Crop
diversification and rotation, soil testing, nutrient recycling, precision application,
and farmer training are all part of it. In order to meet crop needs and reduce loss,
nutrients must be applied in the right amount and at the right time.
Dr. T. Scott Murrell of International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI) stated that
when it comes to the 4Rs of crop nutrition (right source, right rate, right time, right
place), many farmers focus most of their attention on the right rate. The right rate
6. What are some potential limitations of this experiment, and how could
you improve it in the future?
For example, if a plant is deficient in nitrogen, it will not be able to use the
phosphorus and potassium in the soil even if those nutrients are present in
adequate amounts. This is because nitrogen is essential for the production of
chlorophyll, which is necessary for photosynthesis.
VI. COCLUSION
Chan, C., Liao, Y.-Y., & Chiou, T.-J. (2021). The Impact of Phosphorus on Plant Immunity.
Fageria, N. K., Baligar, V. C., & Clark, R. B. (2002). Micronutrients in Crop Production.
Gruñes, D. L., & Allaway, W. H. (2015). Nutritional Quality of Plants in Relation to Fertilizer
https://doi.org/10.2136/1985.fertilizertechnology.c17
Haneklaus, S., Bloem, E., & Schnug, E. (2018). Hungry Plants—A Short Treatise on How to
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8030043
https://doi.org/10.1038/278101a0
Ishfaq, M., Wang, Y., Yan, M., Wang, Z., Wu, L., Li, C., & Li, X. (2022). Physiological Essence
of Magnesium in Plants and Its Widespread Deficiency in the Farming System of China.
Johnston, A. M., & Bruulsema, T. W. (2014). 4R Nutrient Stewardship for Improved Nutrient
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.09.029
Kayoumu, M., Iqbal, A., Muhammad, N., Li, X., Li, L., Wang, X., Gui, H., Qi, Q., Ruan, S.,
Guo, R., Zhang, X., Song, M., & Dong, Q. (2023). Phosphorus Availability Affects the
F. A., & Din, M. (2014). Response of Fodder Maize to Various Levels of Nitrogen and
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.515246
Khan, F., Siddique, A. B., Shabala, S., Zhou, M., & Zhao, C. (2023). Phosphorus Plays Key
2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152861
Leghari, S. L., Laghari , G. M., Wahocho, N. A., & Laghari, A. H. (2016). Role of Nitrogen for
209–218. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309704090
Nirmala, Sehrawat., Mukesh, Yadav., Diwakar, Aggarwal., Ashwanti, Devi. (2020). Drought and
salinity stress as major threat for sustainable Mung bean production: Emerging
10.5281/APS.2020.9.6.3
Ratanoo, R., Walia, S. S., Saini, K. S., & Dheri, G. S. (2022). Residual Effects of Chemical
Fertilizers, Organic Manure and Biofertilizers Applied to Preceding Gobhi sarson Crop
Rekha, Ratanoo., S., S., Walia., K., S., Saini., G., S., Dheri. (2022). Residual Effects of Chemical
Fertilizers, Organic Manure and Biofertilizers Applied to Preceding Gobhi sarson Crop
on Summer Mung Bean (Vigna radiata L.). Legume Research, doi: 10.18805/lr-4767
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-18675-2.00009-2
Swetha Reddy Anthay, Arun Chokkalingam, Jeyashanker, K. B., & Natarajan, B. (2022). An
analysis on micronutrient deficiency in plant leaf and soil using digital image processing.
https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v26.i1.pp568-575
Tahir, S., Iqbal, S., Baba, Z., Nazir, M., Hamid, B., & Rashid, A. (2020). Nitrogen Indices,
Nodulation and Yield of Mung Bean (Vigna radiate L.) as Influenced by Integrated
Nutrient Supply. International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, 21–32.
https://doi.org/10.9734/irjpac/2020/v21i1930274
Vitousek, P. M., Naylor, R., Crews, T., David, M. B., Drinkwater, L. E., Holland, E., Johnes, P.
J., Katzenberger, J., Martinelli, L. A., Matson, P. A., Nziguheba, G., Ojima, D., Palm, C.
A., Robertson, G. P., Sanchez, P. A., Townsend, A. R., & Zhang, F. S. (2009). Nutrient
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170261
Xu, X., Du, X., Wang, F., Sha, J., Chen, Q., Tian, G., Zhu, Z., Ge, S., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Effects
11(904). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00904
Yin, Z., Guo, W., Xiao, H., Liang, J., Hao, X., Dong, N., Leng, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Q., & Yin,
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206285