Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By
Muhammad Ihsan*
Asnawi Muslem
Zulfadli A. Aziz
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
*
Corresponding author: ihsan@santertainment.com
176
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
177
Using The Participation Point System in Teaching Speaking Skills (M. Ihsan, A.
Muslem & Z. A. Aziz)
178
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
Research Questions
1. Will there be any significant difference in the achievements of
students from UIN Ar-Raniry who are taught speaking using
the PPS technique and those who are taught using the usual
technique?
2. What will be the response of the students to the use of PPS for
learning speaking in conversation classes at UIN Ar-Raniry,
Banda Aceh?
LITERATURE REVIEW
Speaking
Language skills that should be mastered by students are reading,
writing, listening, and speaking. Speaking is one of the most important
skills to master in order to acquire the language fully. Brown (2004)
has stated that speaking is a part of the creative construction of
linguistic products. Furthermore, Harmer (2007) has claimed that
speaking is frequently face-to-face and interactive. Speakers may use
non-written language, vocal yariety features, for example altering their
179
Using The Participation Point System in Teaching Speaking Skills (M. Ihsan, A.
Muslem & Z. A. Aziz)
Speaking Skills
Heaton (1990) has said that speaking is a complex skill that needs
the simultaneous use of different abilities, which commonly develop at
different rates. According to Bashir et al. (2011), speaking skills are
productive skills in the oral mode. It is like other language skills, but it
is more complicated than it seems at first and involves more than just
pronouncing written texts.
To conclude, speaking skills are the most challenging part of
learning a foreign language and deserve more attention. They are a vital
part of language learning and need to be developed gradually, step-by-
step.
Teaching Speaking
Teaching speaking is a very crucial part of EFL teaching-learning
to make students able to interact with other speakers of English. As
stated by Nunan (2015, p. 58), the actual test of a student’s ability as a
speaker is whether they are able to communicate with other people that
use the target language outside of the classroom.
This is in line with what has been stated by Thaine (2005) that
practicing the target language regularly is definitely needed in order to
get students used to speaking in the new language. The more they
practice, the more they can concentrate on what the other speaker
expresses and give a proper response to it. Teaching-learning speaking
not only consists of giving students practice in the classroom but also
focusing on methods and techniques which can assist students to
180
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
181
Using The Participation Point System in Teaching Speaking Skills (M. Ihsan, A.
Muslem & Z. A. Aziz)
182
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
183
Using The Participation Point System in Teaching Speaking Skills (M. Ihsan, A.
Muslem & Z. A. Aziz)
184
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This research used a quantitative method with a pre-test and a post-
test design. This research was a type of experimental study using a
Quasi-Experimental Design which had both a pre-test and a post-test
with an experimental (EG) and a control group (CG) and withadirect
assignment of subjects (see below) (Edmonds & Kennedy, 2017, p. 33)
The experimental design which was used in this study was Non-
equivalent Control Group Quasi-Experimental Design which was
almost the same as pre-test-post-test control group design. The EG and
the CG in this design were not chosen at random (Edmonds &
Kennedy, 2017, p. 36).
185
Using The Participation Point System in Teaching Speaking Skills (M. Ihsan, A.
Muslem & Z. A. Aziz)
These first-year students were from many different majors in UIN Ar-
Raniry Banda Aceh.
The population for this research were the non-English department
students of UIN who were taking the conversation class at UIN Ar-
Raniry dormitory that is obligatory for them to complete as a
requirement to finish their degree. The researcher also excluded those
students who had graduated from boarding schools (e.g. Madrasah
Alia) because those students had already attended a better fundamental
conversation class at their previous school. The total population for this
research was 151 students.
To conduct the research on PPS, the researcher chose those
students who were taking the conversation class in the UIN Ar-Raniry
dormitory as a sample for this study, because those students came from
many different majors and were gathered into one class.
There were 151 students who were taking the Conversation class
who did not come from a boarding school. The researcher and one of
the researcher’s acquaintances were each teaching a Conversation class
that semester. Those two separate classes consisted of students who
were not from boarding schools so that’s why those two classes were
suitable to become the samples for this research.
Thus the sample for this study were 30 non-English department
students from two existing conversation classes at UIN in the
2016/2017 Academic Year. The researcher checked for equivalence of
homogeneity in the English achievements of those two classes, and the
results showed there were no significant differences between them.
Blom and Unsworth (2010) aver that every experimental research
must have a minimum of two subject groups, an experimental group
(EG), and a control group (CG). The EG consists of subjects who are
given the treatment, while, the CG consists of subjects who are not
given the treatment in the study. Therefore, the students were divided
into two classes, the CG and the EG. 15 students were assigned to the
EG which waswas to get the PPS technique, and 15 students were
assigned to the CG with the usual Discussion technique. During the
teaching experiment, the treatment was only given to the EG, while the
CG was taught using the Discussion Technique. The post-testscores
from both groups were compared to see if there was any significant
difference between the scores from the two groups or not.
186
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
Research Instruments
Before giving the treatment t the EG, the researcher gave a pre-test
to both the EG and the CG. The pre-test was conducted in order to get
the background information on the students’ prior level of knowledge.
The tests were given in spoken form in order to find out each
student’s speaking ability in understanding and responding to a
conversation. The test was created based on the syllabus specification
for the conversation class which consisted of five questions about
introducing yourself, introducing people, asking and giving
information, simple questions, and asking and giving directions
After conducting the pre-test, the next step was to analyze the
results from the pre-test in order to allow the researcher to compare the
results from the two tests after the treatment. The treatment was
conducted with the EG and the CG for seven meetings.
A questionnaire is a list of questions used to collect written data.
Arikunto (2010) has stated that, regarding the way of answering the
questions, the questions can be divided into two types, viz: open and
closed. Closed questions were chosen for this research in order to limit
the responses from the students This study had 10 questions about the
students’ responses toward the use of PPS in the classroom and was
adopted from Raine (2014). The questionnaire was distributed to the
EG students in order to find out their response to learning speaking
using the PPS in their conversation class at UIN.
Data Analysis
In analyzing the data from this study, the researcher used the data
from the students answers about introducing themselves, introducing
other people, asking and giving information, simple questions, and
asking and giving directions from both the pre-tests and the post-tests
that were done.
187
Using The Participation Point System in Teaching Speaking Skills (M. Ihsan, A.
Muslem & Z. A. Aziz)
for each student were added up to get their final scores at the end of the
semester. Therefore, the EG students were more excited about
practicing speaking in class and this therefore affected their overall
speaking skills performance during the classes.
The students’ overall speaking skill scores from the EG were better
than those from the CG after the PPS technique was applied for
teaching-learning speaking with the EG. This can be seen as the scores
from the EG for the post-test were certainly much higher that those
from the pre-test.
Furthermore, from the questionnaire the EG students responded
positively to the use of the PPS technique for teaching-learning ESL
conversation skills. The students believed that the PPS technique
assisted and motivated them in improving their speaking skills.
188
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
REFERENCES
189
Using The Participation Point System in Teaching Speaking Skills (M. Ihsan, A.
Muslem & Z. A. Aziz)
190
ENGLISH EDUCATION JOURNAL (EEJ), 9(2), 176-191, April 2018
191