Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Magnetization Measurements by Vibrating Sample
Magnetization Measurements by Vibrating Sample
vibrating sample
BANSAL Shivansh
ARATA
ALOU
December 5, 2023
1 Introduction
A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) operates on Faraday’s Law
of Induction, which tells us that changing the magnetic field will pro-
duce an electric field. This electric field can be measured and can
tell us information about the changing magnetic field. A VSM is used
to measure the magnetic behavior of the magnetic materials. A VSM
operates by first placing the sample to be studied in a constant mag-
netic field. If the sample is magnetic, this constant magnetic field will
magnetize the sample by aligning the magnetic domains, or the indi-
vidual magnetic spins, with the field. The stronger the constant field,
the larger the magnetization will be. The magnetic dipole moment
of the sample will create a magnetic field around the sample, some-
times called the magnetic stray field. As the sample is moved up and
down, this magnetic stray field changes as a function of time and can
be sensed by a set of pick-up coils.
The alternating magnetic field will cause an electric field in the pick-
up coils according to Faraday’s Law of Induction. This current will
1
Figure 1: A schematic of Vibrating sample magnetometer
2
2 VSM
2.1 Theoretical part
Consider a uniform magnetic field 𝐵® passing through a surface 𝑆®, the
magnetic flux through the surface can be defined as
Φ = 𝐵® · 𝑆® (1)
𝐵® · 𝑔 (®𝑧 ) = 𝜇 0 𝐼 𝑓 (3)
𝜇0
𝐵® = · 𝐼𝑓 (4)
𝑔 (®𝑧 )
where 𝑔 ( 𝑧 ) is the geometric constant of the arbitrary shape. Combin-
ing equation (1) and (4).
𝜇0
Φ= · 𝐼 𝑓 · 𝑆® (5)
𝑔 (®𝑧 )
We know,
® = ®𝐼 · 𝑆®
𝑚 (6)
using the relation and substituting in equation (5).
=⇒ Φ = 𝑔 (®𝑧) · 𝑚
® (7)
𝑑Φ 𝐵
𝑒 (𝑡) = − (8)
𝑑𝑡
Applying Faraday’s law of induction to equation (7),
𝑑 ( 𝑔 (®𝑧 ) · 𝑚
®)
𝑒 (𝑡) = − (9)
𝑑𝑡
3
As given the sample of magnetic moment 𝑚 ® , follows a vertical sinu-
soidal movement as 𝑧 ( 𝑡 ) = 𝑧𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑠 ( 𝜔𝑡 ) .
𝑑 𝑔 (®𝑧 ) 𝑑𝑧
𝑒 (𝑡) = − · ®
·𝑚 (10)
𝑑𝑧 𝑑𝑡
𝑧 = 𝑧𝑜 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝜔𝑡 (11)
𝑑𝑧
= −𝜔𝑧𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜔𝑡 (12)
𝑑𝑡
𝑑 𝑔 (®𝑧 )
𝑒 (𝑡) = ®
· 𝜔𝑧𝑜 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜔𝑡 · 𝑚 (13)
𝑑𝑧
®
𝑒 (𝑡) ∝ 𝑚 (14)
® = ®
𝑑𝑚
𝑀 (15)
𝑑𝑉
® ∝𝑚
𝑀 ® (16)
®
=⇒ 𝑒 ( 𝑡 ) ∝ 𝑀 (17)
The polarities or winding directions of the four pick-up coils should
be along the direction of the current in order to induce a field in the
sample.
4
Figure 2: Calibration graph of the electromagnet, the black line is the
experimentally measured data point and the red line is the linear fit
of the data set.
5
Figure 3: Measure of the Magnetisation along the easy Axis
6
𝑒𝑠 , corresponds to the point where saturation is occurring. We can
graphically observe it at the point where the curve becomes a hori-
zontal asymptote.
This value, determined graphically, comes with an uncertainty associ-
ated with visual determination. Since we do not have the uncertain-
ties related to the equipment measurements, we can visually estimate
the uncertainty to be around 0.02.
0.17
𝑘ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑑 = 0.028 = 6.07 ± 0.7
0.20
𝑘𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑦 = 0.028 = 7, 14 ± 0.7
the variations in the k values for the parallel and perpendicular curves
arise due to the material’s inherent anisotropy, causing distinct mag-
netic responses for different orientations of the applied field.
Demagnetizing coefficient
We use the relationship between the slope of the linear fit and the
demagnetizing coefficient. Assuming 𝑀 = 𝐻𝑁𝑑0 the slope of a linear fit
can be 𝑁1𝑑 .
We fit the magnetization curves and focus on the linear part.We de-
termine the slope of this linear part, which corresponds to 𝑁1𝑑 We use
this information to calculate 𝑁𝑑 by taking the reciprocal of the slope.
1
𝑁𝑑 = slope of linear fit