Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 ES 120: Introduction to
Economics
Defining Economics
The Ways in Which an Economist Thinks
The Economic Problem
Opportunity Cost
The Production Possibility Frontier
The Production Possibility Frontier and Opportunity Cost
Economic Systems
Positive and Normative Economics
Micro and macroeconomics
1-2
Defining Economics
1-3
Defining Economics
1-4
Defining Economics
1-5
The Ways in Which an Economist Thinks
1-6
The Ways in Which an Economist Thinks
1-7
The Economic Problem
1-9
The Economic Problem
1 - 11
The Economic Problem
1 - 12
The Economic Problem
1 - 13
The Economic Problem
1 - 14
The Economic Problem
1 - 16
Opportunity Cost
1 - 17
Opportunity Cost
1 - 18
Opportunity Cost
1 - 19
Opportunity Cost
1 - 20
Opportunity Cost
1 - 21
Opportunity Cost
1 - 22
The Production Possibility Frontier
The central problem in economics of scarcity,
choice, opportunity cost and resource allocation
of the entire nation can be analysed by using a
production possibility frontier (PPF) or curve
(PPC).
As you will see, the production possibilities
curve is a simple but powerful economic model
because it can demonstrate these related concepts
discussed.
1 - 23
The Production Possibility Frontier
Assumptions Underlying the Production
Possibilities Curve
To understand why the production possibilities
curve for a society is typically bowed outward,
you must understand the assumptions
underlying the PPC:
1. Resources are fully employed.
2. Production takes place over a specific time.
3. The resource inputs, in both quantity and quality, used to
produce are fixed over this time period.
4. Technology does not change over this time period.
1 - 24
The Production Possibility Frontier
Figure 1.1 represents a hypothetical production
possibility frontier AF for an economy
producing two products: food and clothing.
The PPF shows the alternative combinations of
the two products that the country can produce if
it fully utilises all of its resources.
For example, if all the country’s resources were
used in the production of clothing, the total
output would be 30 units of clothing and there
would be no food production.
This is represented by point A.
1 - 25
The Production Possibility Frontier
If, however, all the resources were devoted to
the production of food, the economy would be
at point F with 25 units of food produced but
zero clothing.
Alternatively, the economy could be at any
point on the PPF producing a certain amount of
food and clothing.
Refer to Figure 1.1 for the a discussion of some
important concepts.
1 - 26
The Production Possibility Frontier
. Figure 1.1
1 - 27
The Production Possibility Frontier
However, if the economy were at point G, it
would signify that the economy was under-
utilising its resources.
There would be unemployed resources and by
bringing those resources into use, the economy
could move to a position on the curve such as
point D, where more clothing and food could
be produced.
1 - 28
The Production Possibility Frontier
It is clearly sensible for an economy to be on the
PPF rather than inside it.
This is because at point G, the economy is
producing 15 units of clothing and 10 units of
food, whereas at point D the economy is
producing 21 units of clothing and 15 units of
food.
Once on the PPF it is not possible to increase
the production of one of the two products
without reducing the production of the other
product.
1 - 29
The Production Possibility Frontier
So, for example, if the economy were at point D a
movement along the frontier to point E would
involve a reallocation of resources.
Hence an increase in food production of 5 units
would require a reduction in clothing production
of 6 units.
Points outside the frontier such as H,
representing other combinations of food and
clothing output, are unattainable – given the
existing resource availability and the state of
technology.
1 - 30
The Production Possibility Frontier
Given this discussion, there are three technical
terms that we can use:
Points on the frontier such as B,C,D and E are
referred to as being efficient.
Points inside the frontier such as G are referred
to as being inefficient.
Moving from a point inside the frontier such as
G to that on the frontier is referred to as a
Pareto improvement.
1 - 31
The Production Possibility Frontier
Shift in the PPF
A shift outwards in the PPF, such as a shift to IJ
in Figure 1.2, represents economic growth.
It means the ability to produce more goods
which in the example used means more food
and clothing.
1 - 32
The Production Possibility Frontier
. Figure 1.2
1 - 33
The Production Possibility Frontier
This can be brought about either by :
technological change, i.e. new and better ways
of producing the goods and services, or
an increase in the economy’s productive
capacity,
an increase in the supply of the factors of
production.
This means that a point such as H which was
previously unattainable is now attainable.
1 - 34
The Production Possibility Frontier and
Opportunity Cost
The frontier can be viewed in terms of
opportunity cost since to produce more units of
one product needs resources to be taken from
the production of the other.
In Figure 1.1, the frontier is concave to the origin
and this means that the opportunity cost will
change as we move along the frontier.
1 - 35
The Production Possibility Frontier and
Opportunity Cost
If we start at point A and move down the curve
we can see how the opportunity cost changes.
The frontier exhibits increasing opportunity
costs.
Table 1.1 shows the of opportunity costs!
1 - 36
The Production Possibility Frontier and
Opportunity Cost
A movement from A to B involving the
production of 5 units of food requires a
reduction of 2 units in the production of cloth.
So the opportunity cost of 5 units of food is 2
units of clothing, with an opportunity cost of
0.4. (One unit of food has been gained at the
expense of 0.4 units of clothing.)
The opportunity cost is initially small as the
resources better suited to the production of
food move from the production of clothing.
1 - 37
The Production Possibility Frontier and
Opportunity Cost
As more of food is produced, the opportunity
cost increases and this is referred to as the law
of increasing opportunity costs.
As more food is produced, it is necessary to
reallocate resources which are less suited to the
production of food.
This is more realistic than a PPF that illustrates
a situation of constant opportunity cost.
Kindly read on this in your own time.
1 - 38
Economic Systems
1 - 40
Economic Systems
1 - 41
Economic Systems
2. Market Economy
This is also called the price system which
answers the three basic economic questions via
decentralised decision making.
Under a pure price system, individuals and
families own all of the scarce resources used in
production.
1 - 44
Economic Systems
2. Market Economy
Consequently, choices about what and how
many items to produce are left to private
parties to determine on their own initiative, as
are decisions about how to go about producing
those items.
Furthermore, individuals and families choose
how to allocate their own incomes to obtain the
produced items at prices established via
privately organised mechanisms.
1 - 45
Economic Systems
2. Market Economy
Prices signal to everyone within a price system
which resources are relatively scarce and which
resources are relatively abundant.
This signaling aspect of the price system
provides information to individual buyers and
sellers about
what and how many items should be produced,
how production of items should be organized, and
who will choose to buy the produced items.
1 - 46
Economic Systems
2. Market Economy
Thus, in a price system, individuals and families
own the facilities used to produce automobiles.
They decide which types of automobiles to
produce, how many of them to produce, and how
to bring scarce resources together within their
facilities to generate the desired production.
Other individuals and families decide how much
of their earnings they wish to spend on
automobiles.
1 - 47
Economic Systems
3. Mixed Economy
By and large, the economic systems of the
world’s nations are mixed economic systems
that incorporate aspects of both command and
control and a decentralised price system.
At any given time, some nations lean toward
centralised mechanisms of command and
control and allow relatively little scope for
decentralised decision making.
1 - 48
Economic Systems
3. Mixed Economy
At the same time, other nations limit the extent
to which a central authority dictates answers to
the three basic economic questions, leaving
people mostly free to utilise a decentralised
price system to generate their own answers.
A given country may reach different decisions
at different times about how much to rely on
command and control versus a price system to
answer its three basic economic questions.
1 - 49
Economic Systems
3. Mixed Economy
For instance, until 2008, the people of the United
States preferred to rely mainly on a decentralised
price system to decide
which and how many automobiles to produce,
how to marshal scarce resources to produce those vehicles, and
how to decide who should obtain them.
Do it yourself:
What are the advantages and disadvantages of
each one of these economic systems.
1 - 51
Positive and Normative Economics
Positive economics
Economics uses positive analysis, a value-free
approach to inquiry.
No subjective or moral judgments enter into the
analysis.
For example:
‚If the price of gasoline goes up relative to all other
prices, then the amount of it that people buy will fall.‛
‚If the government increases income tax it will lead to a
fall in the level of consumer expenditure.‛
1 - 52
Positive and Normative Economics
These are positive statements because they can be
checked against the evidence and proved correct
or incorrect.
One of the main aims of economics has been to
develop theories which could help explain
economic behaviour and deal with positive
statements.
Positive statements deal with what is or what will
be – statements that can be empirically tested.
It is not a statement of anyone’s value judgment
or subjective feelings.
1 - 53
Positive and Normative Economics
Normative Economics
Normative economics deals more with value
judgements, statements which include the words
should or ought.
For example
‚Income should be distributed more equally’ is a
normative statement.‛
Unlike a positive statement, there is no way of
proving it correct or incorrect.
1 - 54
Positive and Normative Economics
For many problems analysed in the ‚natural‛
sciences such as physics and chemistry, the
analyses are considered to be virtually value-free.
After all, how can someone’s values enter into a
theory of molecular behaviour?
But economists face a different problem.
They deal with the behaviour of individuals, not
molecules.
That makes it more difficult to stick to what we
consider to be value-free or positive economics
without reference to our feelings. 1 - 55
Positive and Normative Economics
When our values are interjected into the analysis,
we enter the realm of normative economics,
involving normative analysis.
A positive economic statement is
‚If the price of gas rises, people will buy less.‛
If we add to that analysis the statement
‚so we should not allow the price to go up,‛
we have entered the realm of normative
economics—we have expressed a value
judgment.
1 - 56
Positive and Normative Economics
1 - 57
Positive and Normative Economics
Each of us has a desire for different things.
That means that we have different values.
When we express a value judgment, we are
simply saying what we prefer, like, or desire.
Because individual values are diverse, we
expect—and indeed observe—that people
express widely varying value judgments about
how the world ought to be.
1 - 58
Micro and Macroeconomics
It is also important to distinguish between
micro- and macroeconomics.
Microeconomics deals with the decision
making of individuals and firms, and how
particular markets work.
Macroeconomics studies the operation of the
economy as a whole, covering areas such as
unemployment, inflation and aggregate
demand.
Recall: Part One of Principles of Economics will deal with microeconomics
and Part Two with macroeconomics.
1 - 59
END
1 - 60