You are on page 1of 19

Project

Address
Report
GRAITEC INNOVATION Designed by Date
www.graitec.com Verified by Date
17 Burospace 91572 Bièvres Revision A Drawing S

Reinforced concrete footing


Table of Contents

1 Geometry................................................................................................................................. 2
2 Soil input.................................................................................................................................. 2
3 Loads and combinations......................................................................................................... 3
4 Global assumptions................................................................................................................. 4
4.1 Localisation...................................................................................................................................4
4.2 Units..............................................................................................................................................5
4.3 Materials........................................................................................................................................5
4.4 Concrete covers.............................................................................................................................5
5 Design assumptions................................................................................................................. 6
6 Bearing resistance check......................................................................................................... 7
6.1 Bearing resistance assumptions.....................................................................................................7
6.2 Bearing resistance verification......................................................................................................7
7 Load eccentricity..................................................................................................................... 7
7.1 Compressed surface verification...................................................................................................7
7.2 Simplified eccentricity verification...............................................................................................8
7.2.1 Ellipse interaction verification..........................................................................................8
8 Sliding verification.................................................................................................................. 8
8.1 Sliding verifications at ULS..........................................................................................................8
9 Overturning verification......................................................................................................... 9
10 Settlement verification.......................................................................................................... 10
11 Longitudinal reinforcement................................................................................................. 11
11.1 Footing reinforcement calculation..............................................................................................11
11.2 Supported element reinforcement...............................................................................................14
12 Stresses................................................................................................................................... 15
13 Crack width check................................................................................................................. 16
14 Punching shear check........................................................................................................... 18
15 Bill of materials..................................................................................................................... 19

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 1 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

1 Geometry

Type of footing : ISOLATED FOOTING

Geometry description Altitude level (mm)


Footing (mm) Supported element (mm) Footing SE
Width Length Height Width Length Height Top Bottom Top
1700.00 1700.00 400.00 600.00 200.00 700.00 -600.00 -1000.00 100.00
Supported element position
Left
Right
Rear
Front
Element under footing
Type of element under footing Blinding concrete
Thickness of element 50.00 mm Not frozen

2 Soil input
No top level for water sheet.

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 2 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

No bottom level for water sheet.

Soil layers
Min/Max Weight Friction Cohesion

Soil layer Depth Condition angle Type


(mm) (kN/m³) (MPa)
1 - Peat 0.00 / Drained 18.00 25.00 ° 0.01 Cohesive
-300.00 Undrained 18.00 0.00 ° 0.02
2 - Mud, clay(good cohesion) -300.00 / Drained 21.00 30.00 ° 0.06 Cohesive
-800.00 Undrained 21.00 0.00 ° 0.08
3 - Clay (stiff) -800.00 / Drained 19.00 25.00 ° 0.02 Cohesive
- Undrained 19.00 0.00 ° 0.03

Soil layers
Soil layer Poisson's Oedometric Young Menard
ratio modulus modulus modulus
1 - Peat 0.20 0.78 0.70 0.70 1.00
2 - Mud, clay(good cohesion) 0.20 1.67 1.50 0.99 0.66
3 - Clay (stiff) 0.25 6.00 5.00 3.30 0.66

3 Loads and combinations

Load cases description


γEQU γSTR
ID Title Ψ₀ Ψ₁ Ψ₂ γEQU γSTR
Fav Fav
1 G - - - 1.1 1.35 0.9 1
2 Q 0.7 0.5 0.3 1.5 1.5 0 0
3 WX+S 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
4 WX+D 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
5 WX+S2 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
6 WX+D2 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
7 WX+S3 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
8 WX+D3 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
9 WX-S 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
10 WX-D 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
11 WX-S2 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
12 WX-D2 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
13 WX-S3 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
14 WX-D3 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
15 WY+S 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
16 WY+D 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
17 WY-S 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
18 WY-D 0.5 0.2 0 1.5 1.5 0 0
19 Forces Max - - - 1 1 1 1
20 Forces Min - - - 1 1 1 1

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 3 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Loads
Load Load case V
name (kN) (kN⋅m) (kN⋅m) (kN) (kN)
1 1-G 43.09 0.00 0.00 -15.31 0.87
2 2-Q 29.46 0.00 0.00 -16.04 0.00
3 3 - WX+S -27.31 0.00 0.00 12.25 0.00
4 4 - WX+D -9.29 0.00 0.00 7.11 0.00
5 5 - WX+S2 -6.22 0.00 0.00 0.69 0.00
6 6 - WX+D2 13.77 0.00 0.00 -5.31 0.00
7 7 - WX+S3 -14.90 0.00 0.00 10.50 0.00
8 8 - WX+D3 7.49 0.00 0.00 2.57 0.00
9 9 - WX-S -45.05 0.00 0.00 25.14 0.01
10 10 - WX-D -20.70 0.00 0.00 16.98 0.00
11 11 - WX-S2 -6.15 0.00 0.00 1.97 0.00
12 12 - WX-D2 30.90 0.00 0.00 -9.78 0.00
13 13 - WX-S3 -37.38 0.00 0.00 11.19 0.00
14 14 - WX-D3 -5.84 0.00 0.00 1.45 0.00
15 15 - WY+S -44.99 0.00 0.00 26.08 0.00
16 16 - WY+D -16.12 0.00 0.00 15.47 0.00
17 17 - WY-S -48.24 0.00 0.00 22.78 0.00
18 18 - WY-D -17.26 0.00 0.00 14.27 0.00
19 19 - Forces Max 125.53 0.00 0.00 -52.07 1.17
20 20 - Forces Min 58.17 0.00 0.00 -20.67 1.16
Load on ground G 1-G 0.00 - - - -
Load on ground Q 2-Q 0.00 - - - -

Position of force components:


dx = 0.00 mm
dy = 0.00 mm
dz = 0.00 mm / top level of
footing

4 Global assumptions
Calculation according to EN1990 / EN 1991 / EN1992-1-1

4.1 Localisation

Localisation United Kingdom


Element type Isolated Footing
Element ID 5
Position Footing 1, Level 1
Drawing S
Level

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 4 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Coordinates X = 0.00 mm; Y = 0.00 mm; Z = 0.00 mm


4.2 Units

Lengths mm
Forces kN
Moments kN⋅m
Stresses MPa (N/mm²)
Angles °
Reinforcement areas mm²
Crack width mm

4.3 Materials
Concrete quality (EN1992-1-1 / 3.1)
Concrete class: C25/30

ULS :
ULS-A :
ULS-S :
Steel grade (EN1992-1-1 / Section 3 / Annex C)
Steel grade: B500A

Ductility class: A
Horizontal plastic branch
k = 1.05
ULS:
ULS-A:
ULS-S:

4.4 Concrete covers

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 5 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Exposure class XC2 (§4.2)


Structural class S4 (Table 4.3)
Concrete covers (§4.4.1)

Nominal concrete cover (mm) Minimal values (mm)


Top Bottom Lateral
50.00 50.00 50.00 35.00 0.00
Minimal cover value for durability (§4.4.1.2 (5))
Execution tolerance (§4.4.1.1 2(P))
Security tolerance (§4.4.1.2 (6))
Reduction for stainless steel (§4.4.1.2 (7))
Reduction for supplementary protection (§4.4.1.2 (8))

5 Design assumptions
Global design assumptions
Earth loads and overloads on the footing are taken into account for the calculation of the cross sectional
areas of steel in the footing.
Self weight of the footing is considered for reinforcement calculation.
Longitudinal reinforcement design method when no bending moment is defined: Strut-and-tie method
Earthquake codes not taken into account.
Iteration step for calculation of the cross section area of steel is 10.00 mm²
Pedestal self weight taken into account.
Design approach 1
Bearing capacity assumptions
The contact pressure distribution is linear.
The net allowable soil bearing pressure is user-defined.
The inclination factors of the load are taken into account.
Bearing soil behaviour: Cohesive soil (or intermediate).
The soil bearing verification for SLS conditions is not performed.
Sliding assumptions
Type: In-situ member
The friction angle between the soil and the footing: δ = 1 φ’
Load eccentricity assumptions
The footing area in compression must be at least equal to:
7 % of total base area at ULS fundamental/accidental/seismic.
50 % of total base area at SLS characteristic.
67 % of total base area at SLS quasi-permanent/frequent.
Partial factors for soil parameters

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 6 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Soil parameter Symbol Set 1 (M1) Set 2 (M2)


Angle of shearing resistance * 1.00 1.25
Effective cohesion 1.00 1.25
Undrained shear strength 1.00 1.40
Unconfined strength 1.00 1.40
Weight density 1.00 1.00
Friction resistance (seismic) 1.25 1.25
* This factor is applied to tan φ'
Partial resistance factors
Resistance Symbol R1
Bearing (ULS) 1.00
Bearing (SLS) 3.00
Sliding (ULS) 1.00

6 Bearing resistance check

6.1 Bearing resistance assumptions


The contact pressure distribution is linear.
The net allowable soil bearing pressure is user-defined.
The inclination factors of the load are taken into account.
Foundation inclination: 0.00 °.
Bearing soil behaviour: Cohesive soil (or intermediate).
Contact pressure distribution: Linear

6.2 Bearing resistance verification

Drained ULS
Combination: 546: 1.35x[1 G]+1x[19 ENV]+1.05x[2 Q]+0.75x[12 V]
Vertical load
Overburden pressure:
Maximum stress
Design value of soil resistance
(D.4) from EN 1997-1
Total footing bearing area A' = 2890000.00 mm²
Soil bearing capacity (impose)
Ground failure resistance
(6.5.2.1) from EN 1997-1 (17.97%) Passed
Undrained ULS
No ULS combination under undrained conditions.

7 Load eccentricity

7.1 Compressed surface verification

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 7 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

ULS combination 147: 0.9x[1 G]+1.5x[15 V]


Compressed surface verification

8.17 % (Passed)
SLS QP combination 651: 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q]
Compressed surface verification

67.00 % (Passed)
SLS CQ combination 569: 1x[1 G]+1x[2 Q]
Compressed surface verification

50.00 % (Passed)
SLS FQ combination 618: 1x[1 G]+0.5x[2 Q]
Compressed surface verification

67.00 % (Passed)

7.2 Simplified eccentricity verification

7.2.1 Ellipse interaction verification

ULS combination 147: 0.9x[1 G]+1.5x[15 V]


Eccentricity verification
(6.5.4) from EN 1997-1
41.35 % (Passed)
SLS QP combination 651: 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q]
Eccentricity verification
(6.5.4) from EN 1997-1
1.54 % (Passed)
SLS CQ combination 579: 1x[1 G]+1x[2 Q]+0.5x[12 V]
Eccentricity verification
(6.5.4) from EN 1997-1
2.88 % (Passed)
SLS FQ combination 618: 1x[1 G]+0.5x[2 Q]
Eccentricity verification
(6.5.4) from EN 1997-1
1.87 % (Passed)

8 Sliding verification
In-situ member
Friction angle between the soil and the footing: δ = 1 φ'
Bearing soil behavior: Cohesive soil (or intermediate)

8.1 Sliding verifications at ULS

Combi Condition Layer WR


(kN) (kN) (kN)
546 Drained None 135.92 1423.99 0.00 9.54 %

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 8 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Drained conditions
Combination: 546: 1.35x[1 G]+1x[19 ENV]+1.05x[2 Q]+0.75x[12 V]
Horizontal load
Vertical load (initial)
Vertical load (including the effect of earth
pressures)

Sliding resistance (initial)


EN 1997-1, (6.5.3)
The resistance will be modified by lateral active and passive earth pressure on footing:
Active earth pressure coefficient
C.1 (2) from EN 1997-1, Annex C
Passive earth pressure coefficient
C.1 (2) from EN 1997-1, Annex C
Horizontal component of the active earth
pressure on X
Vertical component of the active earth pressure
on X
Horizontal component of the passive
resistance on X
Vertical component of the passive resistance
on X
Horizontal component of the active earth
pressure on Y
Vertical component of the active earth pressure
on Y
Horizontal component of the passive
resistance on Y
Vertical component of the passive resistance
on Y
Applied load component on X with load from
earth trust
Applied load component on Y with load from
earth trust
Resultant from passive earth pressure
Resistance load from passive earth pressure
along X
Resistance load from passive earth pressure
along Y
Passive resistance projected along the axis of
resultant between Hdx and Hdy
Sliding resistance (final)
Sliding verification
Work Ratio 9.54 % (Passed)

9 Overturning verification

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 9 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

X direction:
Load combination 147: 0.9x[1 G]+1.5x[15 V]
Stabilizing moment
Destabilizing moment
Overturning ratio

64.27 % (Passed)
Y direction:
Load combination 149: 0.9x[1 G]+1.5x[17 V]
Stabilizing moment
Destabilizing moment
Overturning ratio

2.41 % (Passed)

10 Settlement verification
The settlement verification is done according the simplified adjusted elasticity method defined in the
appendix F of NF EN1997-1.
Load combination 611: 1x[1 G]+1x[12 V]+0.7x[2 Q]
Allowable settlement
Characteristic vertical load
Bearing pressure

Design value of the elasticity modulus

Poisson coefficient

Shape and rigidity factor

Settlement coefficient
Total settlement

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 10 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Settlement verification
30.56 % (Passed )

11 Longitudinal reinforcement
Earth loads and overloads on the footing are taken into account for the calculation of the cross sectional
areas of steel in the footing.
11.1 Footing reinforcement calculation
The bending moments used to calculate the footing longitudinal reinforcement are calculated in a critical
section, at 0,15 · l1 inside the supported element, where “l1” is the supported element width in the current
direction.
The calculation is performed twice, at left and at right of the critical section. In this chapter, the calculation
for which the maximum bending moment resulted will be detailed (at left or at right).

• Design bending moment in critical section, MEd = M - M’= R · k – R’· k’


• R is the resultant of the contact pressures block
• k is the lever arm for R (between R and the critical section where the moment is calculated)
• R' is the resultant of the footing self-weight, earth loads and overloads
• k' is the lever arm for R’ (between R’ and the critical section where the moment is calculated)
Note: When contact pressure distribution is rectangular, soil pressure bending moment (M) is calculated as
pl²/2, where l is the cantilever length (distance between the critical section and the footing edge).
Otherwise, for contact pressure blocks which are not rectangular, the soil pressure bending moment is
calculated as R · k.
• Lc is the foundation length in cantilever
• L1 is the foundation width along the current direction (X/Y)
• L2 is the foundation width perpendicular on the current direction (X/Y)
Along X direction, Bottom side

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 11 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

ULS load combination 546: 1.35x[1 G]+1x[19 ENV]+1.05x[2 Q]+0.75x[12 V]


Bi-cantilever method.
Critical calculation resulted at Left
Foundation length in cantilever
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads resultant force
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads bending moment
Soil pressure bending moment
Design bending moment

Reduced moment

Theoretical reinforcement

Minimum reinforcement

Required reinforcement

Provided reinforcement 8 × ø12 (Spacing = 218.29 mm)

Along X direction, Top side


ULS load combination 149: 0.9x[1 G]+1.5x[17 V]
Bi-cantilever method.
Critical calculation resulted at Left
Foundation length in cantilever
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads resultant force
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads bending moment
Soil pressure bending moment
Design bending moment

Reduced moment

Theoretical reinforcement

Minimum reinforcement

Required reinforcement

Provided reinforcement 8 × ø12 (Spacing = 218.29 mm)

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 12 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Along Y direction, Bottom side


ULS load combination 546: 1.35x[1 G]+1x[19 ENV]+1.05x[2 Q]+0.75x[12 V]
Bi-cantilever method.
Critical calculation resulted at Left
Foundation length in cantilever
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads resultant force
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads bending moment
Soil pressure bending moment
Design bending moment

Reduced moment

Theoretical reinforcement

Minimum reinforcement

Required reinforcement

Provided reinforcement 8 × ø12 (Spacing = 218.29 mm)

Along Y direction, Top side

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 13 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

ULS load combination 149: 0.9x[1 G]+1.5x[17 V]


Bi-cantilever method.
Critical calculation resulted at Left
Foundation length in cantilever
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads resultant force
Footing self weight and earth loads and
overloads bending moment
Soil pressure bending moment
Design bending moment

Reduced moment

Theoretical reinforcement

Minimum reinforcement

Required reinforcement

Provided reinforcement 8 × ø12 (Spacing = 218.29 mm)

11.2 Supported element reinforcement


Earth loads and overloads on the footing are not taken into account for the calculation of the cross sectional
areas of steel in the footing.
Iteration step for calculation of the cross section area of steel is 10.00 mm²
No splitting of the normal force.
Starter bars
Main reinforcement along X 3HA14 (spacing = 46.41 mm)
Scondry reinforcement along X --------
Main reinforcement along Y 3HA14 (spacing = 246.41 mm)
Scondary reinforcement along Y --------
Rectangular Bars 3HA6 (spacing = 299.00 mm) (90°)
Pins
Along X --------
Along Y --------

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 14 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

12 Stresses

Lower side, X direction


Load combination 611: 1x[1 G]+1x[12 V]+0.7x[2 Q]
Bending moment
Compressed concrete stress
2.79 % (Passed)
Tensioned reinforcement stress
13.79 % (Passed)
Crack opening
17.92 % (Passed)

Lower side, Y direction


Load combination 611: 1x[1 G]+1x[12 V]+0.7x[2 Q]
Bending moment
Compressed concrete stress
3.24 % (Passed)
Tensioned reinforcement stress
15.31 % (Passed)
Crack opening
19.88 % (Passed)

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 15 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Upper side, X direction


Load combination 598: 1x[1 G]+1x[15 V]
Bending moment
Compressed concrete stress
0.23 % (Passed)
Tensioned reinforcement stress
0.09 % (Passed)
Crack opening
0.00 % (Passed)

Upper side, Y direction


Load combination 600: 1x[1 G]+1x[17 V]
Bending moment
Compressed concrete stress
0.18 % (Passed)
Tensioned reinforcement stress
0.04 % (Passed)
Crack opening
0.00 % (Passed)

13 Crack width check

Crack width verification

Direction Position Combi WR


(mm) (‰) (mm) (mm)
Along X Bottom 651 583.68 0.09 0.05 0.30 17.92 %
Along Y Bottom 651 583.68 0.10 0.06 0.30 19.88 %
The crack opening calculation is done according to EN 1992-1-1, 7.3.4 (1).
Cracking in X direction (bottom)
Combination 651: 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q]
Neutral axis position
Effective tension area, surrounding the
tension reinforcement
(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

Maximum crack spacing


(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

Secant Young modulus

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 16 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Short term equivalence coefficient

Difference between average strains


(7.3.4 (2))

Crack width
(7.3.4 (1))
Crack width verification
(17.92 %) Passed

Cracking in Y direction (bottom)


Combination 651: 1x[1 G]+0.3x[2 Q]
Neutral axis position
Effective tension area, surrounding the
tension reinforcement
(7.3.4(2), Fig. 7.1)

Maximum crack spacing


(7.3.4(3), 7.11)

Secant Young modulus

Short term equivalence coefficient

Difference between average strains


(7.3.4 (2))

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 17 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Crack width
(7.3.4 (1))
Crack width verification
(19.88 %) Passed

14 Punching shear check


Load combination ULS 546: 1.35x[1 G]+1x[19 ENV]+1.05x[2 Q]+0.75x[12 V]
Critical position

Control perimeter

Control area

Net applied stress


(6.49) from EN 1992-1-1

§6.2.2(1) from EN 1992-1-1

§6.4.4(1) from EN 1992-1-1

(6.47) from EN 1992-1-1

Punching shear capacity at control


perimeter
§6.4.4(1) from EN 1992-1-1
(6.50) from EN 1992-1-1

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 18 of 19


Project: Date: 12-05-2023

Punching shear check


(15.90%) Passed

15 Bill of materials

Formwork dimensions summary


A B H
(mm) (mm) (mm)
1700.00 1700.00 400.00

Reinforcement summary
Diameter Length Weight
H6 4362.05 mm 0.97 kg
H14 9990.37 mm 12.07 kg
H12 58156.74 mm 51.63 kg

Footing 5 -
Rigid Point
Concrete Formwork Steel Bedding Muck Backfill Reinf. Ratio
Support Level
1
Quantity 1.16 m³ 2720000.00 64.67 kg 0.00 m³ 3.03 m³ 1.66 m³ 55.94 kg/m³
mm²
Price 0.00 £ 0.00 £ 0.00 £ 0.00 £ - -
Total 0.00 £

Average Diameter: 12.03 mm

Advance Design RC Footing 2024 Page 19 of 19

You might also like