DAVAO ORIENTAL STATE UNIVERSITY

ZOILO L. OSTOS
Bachelor of Physical Education
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

I …………………………………………………………………………………………….. Introduction

II …………………………………………………………………………………………….. Purpose of the Assessment

III …………………………………………………………………………………………….. Requirement of 20 Yard Agility Test

IV ……………………………………………………………………………………………... Process in Conducting Assessment

V ……………………………………………………………………………………………… Data Analysis

VI ……………………………………………………………………………………………… Result and Review of Related Literature

VII ……………………………………………………………………………………………… Conclusion

VIII ……………………………………………………………………………………………… References

 I. Introduction

According to (Pauole. K et al 2000). testing an individual's ability to move in all directions as quickly as
possible it also a tests “combination of leg speed, leg power, and agility for performance”. The t-test is a
popular way to measure athletes ability to change direction forwards, backwards and side to side.

The t-test requires athletes to sprint forwards 10 yards, shuffle to the left 5 yards, then shuffle to the right 10
yards, then shuffle back to the left 5 yards and then run backwards to return to the start/finish line. This
process can then be repeated but the athlete should shuffle to the right first.

The T-Test is an important clinical test because as identified by Pauole et al (2000) but also because they
found it to be very reliable as “a measure of leg speed, leg power, and agility”.

Here's a brief overview of how the T-Test is typically conducted:

Setup:

● Set out the four cones, please note that 5 yards = 4.57m and 10 yards = 9.14m.

Measurement:

● Time: The athlete's tota l time for finishing the drill is noted.

● Appropriate Form: In order to maximize speed and agility during the drill, good running form must be
maintained.
● Rapid Directional Corrections: Athletes must concentrate on executing quick and accurate direction
adjustments around every cone

Procedure:

● The subject starts at cone A. On the command of the timer, the subject sprints to cone B and touches the
base of the cone with their right hand.
● They then turn left and shuffle sideways to cone C, and also touches its base, this time with their left hand.
Then shuffling sideways to the right to cone D and touching the base with the right hand.
● They then shuffle back to cone B touching with the left hand, and run backwards to cone A.

● The stopwatch is stopped as they pass cone A.

Scoring:

● The trial will not be counted if the subject crosses one foot in front of the other while shuffling, fails to touch
the base of the cones, or fails to face forward throughout the test. Take the best time of two successful trials
to the nearest 0.1 seconds.

Purpose:

● The Agility T-test is commonly used to assess the ability of team sport athletes to change direction, including
acceleration, deceleration, and lateral movement during preseason testing protocols.
● The outcomes are analyzed by trainers and coaches to compare athletes' levels of agility, pinpoint areas for
development, and create customized training plans.
Considerations:

● Proper warm-up and stretching are crucial before performing this test to prevent injuries.

● For safety, a spotter should be positioned a few meters behind cone A to catch players in case they fall
while running backward through the finish.
● Consistent testing conditions and proper measurement are essential for accurate and reliable results.

II. Purpose of the Assessment

The primary reasons for conducting the Agility T-Test include:

Agility Assessment:

The Agility T-Test is a test that is commonly used to assess athletes/individuals ability to move forwards,
backward, and side to side.

Sport-Specific Evaluation:

During preseason testing protocols, the Agility T-test is frequently used to evaluate team sport athletes'
capacity for direction changes, including acceleration, deceleration, and lateral movement.

Performance Prediction:

Agility is generally linked to total athletic performance. A strong performance in the Agility T-Test may
suggest good coordination, balance, and quick reflexes, which can translate to success in sports and other physical
activities.

Training Progress Monitoring:

Agility tests, such as the Agility T-Test, are used by coaches and trainers to track a participant's development in
agility training regimens. It facilitates monitoring the progression of coordination, speed, and direction change over
time.

Injury Prevention:

Programs for injury prevention may include agility testing. Because they can avoid obstacles and abrupt
changes in direction more easily, those with high agility are less likely to sustain some kinds of injuries.

Research and Performance Analysis:

Agility tests can be utilized by scholars and athletes to examine movement patterns and variables that
impact agility. The research advances our knowledge of human performance. Coaches and athletes can track
improvements in agility over time by regularly integrating the Agility T-Test into training regimens. This data is
helpful for tailoring training regimens and emphasizing particular areas of agility improvement.
III. Requirements of the Assessment

Here are the basic requirements for conducting the Agility T-Test:

1. Open Space: A field, a court, or any other suitable surface with adequate room for the athlete to sprint and
change directions can be used to build up the course. The testing area should be 20 yards by 20 yards.

2. Cones: 4 cones are required to mark the course. (5 yards = 4.57 m, 10 yards = 9.14 m).

3. Stopwatch or Timing System: Precise timing is crucial for evaluating a person's performance. Utilize a timing
device or stopwatch to determine how long it takes the athlete to finish the course.

4. Measuring Tape or Markings: Make sure the cones are positioned precisely by using a measuring tape or
other surface marks. This keeps testing impartiality and uniformity intact.

5. Recording Sheet: Make sure that recording sheet is ready before performing this test. So that it will be easy
for you to put the score.

6. Appropriate Attire: Athletes should wear proper shoes and attire that is suitable for running and quick
changes of direction. This ensures safety and optimal performance during the test.

7. Instructions: Inform the participants in plain language about the test's methodology and any applicable
regulations. Verify that they comprehend the necessity of touching the ground or cones at every turn.

8. Warm-Up: Give participants a warm-up to get their muscles and joints ready for the Agility T-Test. A
thorough warm-up guarantees a more accurate evaluation and helps prevent injuries.
IV. Process in Conducting Assessment

 Assessment Orientation: Respondents were given an introduction to the evaluation procedure during the
orientation. Assisting them in becoming acquainted with the procedures, standards, and system is the aim.
This is to guarantee that participants comprehend their duties and obligations and possess the essential data
to excel in the evaluation.

Key Components:

● Collection of Medical Certificates: Making sure the participants are healthy, as this reduces the possibility of
hazards or difficulties throughout the evaluation procedure.

● Warm Up/ Stretching: It improves overall performance, lowers the chance of injury, and emotionally and
physically prepares the body. This can improve joint flexibility, resulting in more fluid motions and a lower
chance of sprains or strains in the muscles.

● Introduce the Assessment (Agility T-Test): The purpose of the assessment was to assist the subjects learn
what to do and to create clarity for both the assessor and the people being assessed.

● Setting up the materials: The overall effectiveness and success of the activity are influenced by the proper
setup of the materials. Preparing the supplies ahead of time increases the activity's efficiency. The activity
can begin quickly, and changes between its phases go more smoothly.

● Demonstration: Gives participants a concrete and visual point of reference to help them grasp expectations,
pick up new skills, and provide their best effort. This inclusiveness guarantees that different individuals can
comprehend and exhibit their abilities or expertise in an efficient manner.

● Practical Assessment: Evaluates skills that are applied and practical rather than intellectual. This adds to a
comprehensive picture of a person's talents and offers insights on practical competence.
V. Data Analysis

Scoring: The trial will not be counted if the subject crosses one foot in front of the other while shuffling, fails to
touch the base of the cones, or fails to face forward throughout the test. Take the best time of two successful trials
to the nearest 0.1

Male (seconds) Female (seconds)

Excellent <9.5 <10.5

Good 9.5 to 12.5 10.5 to 11.5

Average 10.5 to 11.5 11.5 to 12.5

Poor >11.5 >12.5

This table shows the scores of male and female students that they get in performing the assessment .

FEMALE SCORES REMARKS MALE SCORES REMARKS

SUBJECT 1 11.19 GOOD SUBJECT 23 8.47 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 2 10.55 GOOD SUBJECT 24 8.80 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 3 11.02 GOOD SUBJECT 25 9.15 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 4 9.29 EXCELLENT SUBJECT 26 8.50 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 5 10.93 GOOD SUBJECT 27 8.12 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 6 10.59 GOOD SUBJECT 28 8.31 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 7 10.94 GOOD SUBJECT 29 8.04 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 8 11.45 GOOD

SUBJECT 9 11.11 GOOD

SUBJECT 10 9.48 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 11 9.38 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 12 10.27 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 13 10.49 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 14 10. 20 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 15 9.10 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 16 10.17 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 17 9.77 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 18 9.53 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 19 9.57 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 20 9.49 EXCELLENT

SUBJECT 21 11.35 GOOD

SUBJECT 22 11.91 AVERAGE

TOTAL 227.78 TOTAL 59.39

MEAN 10.35 MEAN 8.45

Solution:
Mean: Female: Male: Female: Male:
M= 227.78 M= 59.39 R= 11.91 R= 9.15
M= Sum of All Deviations 22 7 - -
Number of Data Points = 10.35 = 8.45 9.10 8.04
= 2.81 = 1.11

A. GRAPH 01

Division of class population based on their gender.

B. GRAPH 02

Overall class performance/ score based on Gender.

VI. Results and Review of Related Literature

The results of the Agility T-Test are presented in the table, derived from data collected from a
sample of twenty-nine (29) test participants. The average score for female subjects is 10.35, categorizing
them as having an excellent level of performance. Similarly, male subjects achieved an overall mean of
8.45, also indicating an excellent level of performance. Overall, both genders demonstrated a
commendable proficiency in the Agility T-Test. The test outcome demonstrates its efficacy.

From the collected data, it was observed that male students achieved the highest average in the
Agility T- Test. On the other hand, female got an excellent level of performance also. Although there are
difference between their average score but the outcome is still equal.

The Agility T-Test is a practical and effective way to evaluate one's agility and quickness. It provides
valuable insights, helping me assess the subjects’ suitability for positions that demand rapid changes in
direction in the field. Participants who perform well in the Agility T-test often possess a combination of
speed, agility, and explosiveness. The results provided can be valuable in this study in assessing the
subjects’ agility and speed, which are essential components of this assessment.

Paule et. al. (2000) said that the T-test appears to be highly reliable and measures a combination of
components, including leg speed, leg power, and agility, and may be used to differentiate between those
of low and high levels of sports participation.. The Agility T-test drill, which uses four cones in the shape of
an T, evaluates how fast a player can change direction while accelerating.

Having the ability to produce a muscle contraction that is quick and powerful in a sporting situation
and the stronger and more efficient this contraction is the lower the likelihood of injury (Hübscher M et al
2010). The T-Test is an important clinical test because as identified by Pauole et al (2000) but also because
they found it to be very reliable as “a measure of leg speed, leg power, and agility”.

It states on the study conducted by Langley, J. (2011), Agility is dependent upon multiple physical
and biomechanical attributes The current investigation provides insights into test design, which could be
sport or position-specific. The development of such tests will also create an opportunity for examining
different training methodologies to improve an athlete’s sport-specific agility.
VII. Conclusion

In conclusion, the study Agility T-test has provided a valuable understanding of participants' agility,
speed, and ability to change direction quickly. The results indicated a range of performances, with notable
strengths and areas for improvement identified across individuals.

The assessment of agility, as demonstrated by the Agility T-Test, is crucial for understanding an
individual's capacity to navigate dynamic movements efficiently. The test not only serves as a practical tool
for evaluating athletic performance but also offers meaningful information for designing targeted training
programs.

As we move forward, this research provides a foundation for further investigations into the
relationship between specific training interventions and improvements in agility, potentially influencing
athletic performance in various areas. It is recommended that future studies explore the effects of
targeted agility training programs, considering the potential impact on injury prevention and overall
physical fitness.

Ultimately, the Agility T- Test emerges as a valuable tool for assessing and enhancing agility,
contributing to a comprehensive understanding of athletic capabilities. The findings from this study lay the
groundwork for informed training strategies and highlight the significance of agility in optimizing human
performance across diverse activities.
VIII. References

Baskoro, et.al., (2020). Agility Side Step Test Development

Test Device Motion Sensor Based.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hi=en&as_sdt=0,5&qsp=2&q=side+step+test+agility
Raya, M. et.al., (2013). Comparison of three agility tests
with male servicemembers: Edgren Side Step Test, T-Test, and
Illinois Agility Test.
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hi=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=side+step+test+agility&btnG=#d =g_
qabs&t=1670974103820&u=%23p%3DaGDcIRt-
Mx8J
Wilderman D, et.al., (2009). Thigh muscle activity, knee motion,
and impact force during side-step pivoting in agility-trained
female basketball players
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?
hI=en&as_sdt=0,5&qsp=2&q=side+step+test+agility&qst=i b#d=gs_
qabs&t=1670981846250&u=%23p%DYBd224L. oqgu
Wood, R. (2022). Side Step Test
https://www.topendsports.com/testing/tests/sidestep.htm
https://www.houstontexans.com/news/nfl-combine-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-3-cone-drill#:~:text=The
%203%2Dcone%20drill%20at,can%20change%20direction%20while%20accelerating.
https://www.brianmac.co.uk/ltest.htm [Accessed 2/12/2023]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5358030/
https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4389&context=etd