Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JacquelineE.Jung
Jung
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE:
THEWISEANDFOOLISHVIRGINSOFMAGDEBURGCATHEDRAL
Thenshallthekingdomofheavenbeliketotenvirgins,whotakingtheirlampswentoutto
meetthebridegroomandthebride.Andfiveofthemwerefoolish,andfivewise.Butthefive
foolish,havingtakentheirlamps,didnottakeoilwiththem.Butthewisetookoilintheir
vesselswiththelamps.Andthebridegroomtarrying,theyallslumberedandslept.Andat
midnighttherewasacrymade:Beholdthebridegroomcometh,goyeforthandmeethim.Then
allthevirginsaroseandtrimmedtheirlamps.Andthefoolishsaidtothewise:Giveusofyour
oil,forourlampsaregoneout.Thewiseanswered,saying:Lestperhapstherebenotenough
forusandforyou,goyerathertothemthatsell,andbuyforyourselves.Nowwhilsttheywent
tobuy,thebridegroomcame:andtheythatwereready,wentinwithhimtothemarriage,and
thedoorwasshut.Butatlastcame alsotheothervirgins,saying:Lord,Lord,opentous.But
heansweringsaid:AmenIsaytoyou,Iknowyounot.Watchyetherefore,becauseyouknow
notthedaynorthehour.
(Matt.25:1–13)
TheparableoftheWiseandFoolishVirginsoccupiesacentralplaceinChrist’s
lengthyeschatologicaldiscourseintheGospelofMatthew,Chapters24–25.The
talefollowsavivid,violentdescriptionofthesecondcomingoftheSonofMan,
punctuated by warnings that although »this generation shall not pass, till all
thesethingsbedone,«noone–»nottheangelsofheavenbuttheFatheralone«
– can know »what hour your Lord will come« (Mt. 24.34–36). It is succeeded
bytheparableoftheservantwhowaspunishedforhoardinghismoneyrather
thanseekingtoincreaseitashiscohortshaddone,whichleadsintoChrist’sde-
scriptionoftheJudgmentitself.Takentogether,thesepassagespresenttheLast
Thingslessasaprocessofredemptionthanastheunequivocalestablishment
ofperpetualbinarydivisions:thesheeptaketheirplaceattherighthandofthe
SonofManandthegoatsattheleft;theenterprisingservantsareextolledby
theirlordandthetimidoneisbanished;theWiseVirginsentertheweddingfeast
andtheFoolishpoundatthedoor,unrecognizedbythoseinside.
IncontrasttotheparableoftheTalents,thatoftheWiseandFoolishVirgins
founditswayintovisualrepresentationsasearlyasthefourthcentury,whenit
wasincludedincatacombprogramsasapictorialreminderofpromisedredemp-
tion.1ThroughouttheMiddleAges,theVirginsappearedinfunerarycontexts
1TheearliestknownexamplesinWesternartcomefromthe4th-centuryCoemeteriumostrianum
andthecatacombsofSt.CyriakainAgroVerona.TheformerexampleshowsonlytheWise
Virgins,firstproceedingtowardandthendiningwithChrist.Inthelattercase,aconflation
oftheparablewithasceneofJudgment,thetwogroupsstandtoeithersideofChrist.These
examplesarediscussedinwhatisstilltheonlydetailediconographicstudyoftheparable:
122 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Fig.1:Magdeburg,
CathedralofSts.Mauriceand
Catherine.Northportalwith
WiseandFoolishVirgins,ca.
1250.(Photobyauthor.)
(for example, on historiated tombs), in large-scale paintings inside churches,
andinthesculptureprogramsofexteriorportals.2Inamannerappropriateto
thebiblicaltext,thefigurestypicallyformedonesmallpartoflargerprograms
ofLastJudgmentimagery–so,forexample,onthecenterportalonthewest
façadeofSt.Denis(ca.1144),wheretheyappearasmoralizingcounterpartsto
theElectandtheDamned.Inthemiddleofthethirteenthcentury,however,
a group of sculptors – and their high-ranking clerical patrons – defied both
text and tradition to create a monumental, autonomous, and psychologically
inflectedrenditionofthestory.Eschewingexternalcontextualindicatorsofthe
figures’status,thesedesignersallowedthewomen’sbodiesalonetocarrythe
story’smeaning.Insodoing,theirgoalseemstohavebeenlesstocallattention
totheinevitableoutcomeofthenarrativethantoallowbeholderstounderstand,
outcome
Walter Lehmann, Die Parabel von den klugen und törichten Jungfrauen. Ph.D. Diss. Frei-
burg/Br. 1916, 10f. See also Hans Sachs, Jungfrauen, kluge und törichte, in: Lexikon der
christlichen Ikonographie. Bd. II. Freiburg/Br. 1970, Sp.458–463 and Karl Künstle (Hg.),
IkonographiederchristlichenKunst.Bd.I.Freiburg/Br.1928,397–399.
2ForacatalogueofextantVirginsprogramsinvariousmedia,withanemphasisonFrance,
Germany,andEngland,seeLehmann(asnote1),21–78.
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 123
Jung
whichthatoutcomeengendered.Conceptuallyandartistically,thiswasamove
of exceptional novelty and daring, and, while the resulting pictorial program
hashardlybeenignoredbyscholarsortourists,itssignificanceinthehistoryof
Westernvisualrepresentationshasnotbeenadequatelyappreciated.Iamrefer-
ring,ofcourse,totheWiseandFoolishVirginsinthenorthtranseptporchof
thegreatmetropolitancathedralofMagdeburg(fig.1).3
Thetensandstonestatues,eachstandingjustoverfourfeettallandcarved
nearlyintheround,werefashionedinthemiddledecadesofthethirteenthcen-
turybyaworkshopsteepedinthehighlyexpressivemodedevelopedslightlyear-
lieratReimsandBamberg.4Asarthistorianshavelongrecognized,theprogram
isgroundbreakingonatleasttwocounts:itisthefirstinWesternmedievalart
tobededicatedsolelytoaparable,andthefirsttodepictexclusivelyfemalesub-
jects.ItsparkedanexplosionofmonumentalWiseandFoolishVirginsportals
throughoutGerman-speakinglandsinthelatethirteenthandearlyfourteenth
centuries, ranging from the relatively staid maidens at Strassburg Münster to
theebullientyoungwomenonthetriangularporchofErfurtCathedral.Why
itshouldhavebeenpreciselyMagdeburgthatlaunchedthisiconographictrend
remainsanopenquestion,oneseldomaddressedinthescholarlyliterature.The
city’sname–translated,inmedievalsources,toParthenopolisor
Parthenopolis civitasvirginum
–proclaimedanaffiliationwithyoung,unmarriedwomen,andtheofficialem-
blemsofthetownduringthemid-thirteenthcenturyrevealanacuteconcern
withrenderingvisiblethisaspectofitsidentity. 5Thesurvivingmunicipalseal
of1244boreanimageofafrontal,standingwomanwithloosehair,cladina
slinkygownwithlong,danglingsleeves,6whiletheimposingequestrianfigure
producedaroundthesametimefortheOldMarketSquarewasaccompanied
by both a pair of young ladies carrying the town emblems and a series of fe-
maleheadspeekingoutfromwindowsinthe(nowlost)architecturalbaldachin
3For the cathedral’s history, see Ernst Schubert, Der Magdeburger Dom: Ottonische Grün-
dungundstaufischerNeubau,in:ErnstUllmann(Hg.),DerMagdeburgerDom:Ottonische
GründungundstaufischerNeubau.BerichtübereinwissenschaftlichesSymposioninMag-
deburgvom7.10.bis11.10.1986.Leipzig1989,25–44.
4SeeErnstSchubert,DerDominMagdeburg.Leipzig1994,110–112andders.,DerMagdebur-
gerDom.Wien/Köln1974,202–205.OntheconnectionoftheMagdeburgfigurestoworks
atBambergandReims,seeMartinGosebruch,Dasoberrheinisch-bambergischeElementim
MagdeburgerDom,in:Ullmann(asnote3),132–140,133andDietrichSchubert,VonHal-
berstadtnachMeissen:Bildwerkedes13.JahrhundertsinThüringen,Sachsen,undAnhalt.
Köln1974,303f.
5AccordingtotheGestaArchiepiscoporumMagdeburgensium,ed.WilhelmSchum,in:Mo-
numentaGermaniaeHistorica,SS,vol.XIV.Hannover1883,repr.Stuttgart1963,377,the
city’snamereferrednottotheVirginMarybuttoaRomantempleofArtemisdestroyedby
Charlemagne.Onthehistoryofthecity,seeHannsGringmuth-Dallmer,Magdeburginot-
tonischerundstaufischerZeit,in:Ullmann(asnote3),52–61.
6The archiepiooscopal seal showed an armed knight, representing St. Maurice. Both are re-
producedinHerbertvonEinem,ZurDeutungdesMagdeburgerReiters,in:Zeitschriftfür
Kunstgeschichte16,1953,43–60,47.
124 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
abovehishead.7Theproductionoftheseimagescoincidedwithasurgeoffe-
malereligiousandsocialactivityinthetown,withtheefflorescenceofBeguine
communitiesandthegrowingfameofthevernacularvisionarywritingsofone
oftheirmembers,MechthildofMagdeburg.8Thereisnoneedtoimaginethat
theVirginsportalwasmadeeithertocelebratewomen’saccomplishmentsinthe
townortospeakprimarilytofemaleviewers; 9thecathedralclergywhocommis-
sionedthesculptureswerenomorefeministintheirsensibilitythantheirpeers
elsewhere,andinherwritingsMechthildcomplainedbitterlyofthescornand
condescensiontowhichtheysubjectedher.10Ontheotherhand,theestablish-
mentofmanynewconventsinthedioceseduringtheseyears,andtheclergy’s
verytolerance,ifnotsupport,ofMechthild’sliteraryactivity,meansthatthey
wereinnowayoblivioustothesocial,intellectual,spiritualpowerofwomenin
theircommunity.Indeed,theveryfactthattheychosetheWiseandFoolishVir-
gins–castnotasabstractedallegoricalfiguresbutasindividuated,expressive
womenininsistentlymoderndress–toembellishthecathedral’smainpublic
entranceindicatesacertainreadinesstoseewomeninasympatheticlight,to
assignthemarolenotaspassive»objects«ofadetached»malegaze«butasac-
tive,sentient,feelingsubjectswithwhomviewersofbothsexesandvarioussocial
statuseswouldeasilyidentify.11
Despiteitsiconographicnoveltyanditsinfluence,theMagdeburgportalis
surprisinglylittleknownintheEnglish-speakingworld.Itisabsentfromthemost
widelyusedsurveysofmedievalandGothicart,12andwhenitdoesfindmention
7For discussion of these secondary figures, with reference to further bibliography, see Vir-
giniaRoehrigKaufmann,TheMagdeburgRider:AnAspectoftheReceptionofFrederick
II’sRomanRevivalNorthoftheAlps,in:IntellectualLifeattheCourtofFrederickIIHo-
henstaufen,ed.WilliamTronzo.(=StudiesintheHistoryofArt,44)Washington,D.C.1994,
63–88.Thebaldachine e,knownfromearlyengravings,wasdestroyedinthe16thcenturyand
replacedbythecurrentstructurein1651.
8OntheBb beguines,seeHerbertGrundmann,ReligiousMovementsintheMiddleAges,trans.
StevenRowan.NotreDame,Ind.1995,139–152.OnMechthild,seeibid.,142fandHansNeu-
mann,BeiträgezurTextgeschichtedes»FliessendenLichtsderGottheit«undzurLebensge-
schichteMechthildsvonMagdeburg,in:KurtRuh(Hg.),Altdeutscheundaltniederländische
Mystik.(=WegederForschung,23).Darmstadt1964,175–239.
9Cf.HelgaSciurie,DieErfurterJungfrauenundihrPublikum,in:BildendeKunst5,1989,50f.
10OnMechthild’stroubledrelationshipwiththeclergyofMagdeburg,andtheeffectithadon
herself-perception,seeCarolineWalkerBynum,WomenMysticsintheThirteenthCentury:
TheCaseoftheNunsofHelfta,in:CarolineWalkerBynum,JesusasMother:Studiesinthe
SpiritualityoftheHighMiddleAges.Berkeley1982,170–262,235–247.
11The use of female figures – even in the highly gendered context of bridal narratives – as
vehiclesofempathyandidentificationformenaswellaswomenwaswidespreadindidactic
literatureinthelatethirteenthandearlyfourteenthcenturies.Foraparticularlylivelyex-
ample,seeKonradsBüchleinvondergeistlichenGemahelschaft:UntersuchungundText.
Hrg.v.UlrichSchülke.München1970.Suchcasesbeliethecommonlyheldassumptionthat
imagesofwomenmusthaveappealedprimarilytowomen,andimagesofmentomen.
12E.g.JanettaReboldBenton,ArtoftheMiddleAges.London2002;MichaelCamille,Gothic
Art:GloriousVisions.NewYork1996;MarilynStokstad,MedievalArt.NewYork1988and
RobertG.Calkins,MonumentsofMedievalArt.Ithaca,NY1979.
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 125
ittypicallyservesasanexampleofthesupposedlycharacteristicGermanicpro-
Jung
clivityforoverblownemotionalism13or»interestinpresentingthemorecapri-
ciousaspectsofthedogmaticthemes.«14Buttheunusualexpressivenessofthe
figureshasbeenleftlargelyunexplored.Eventheauthorsofthemostimportant
recentarthistoricalinvestigationsintoGothicexpressivityhaveignoredthepos-
sibilityofpurposefulnessbehindthese»grotesqueexaggerationsofsuffering,«
this»homileticcontrastofmoralabsolutes.«15 ThesubstantialGermanliterature
ontheportal,meanwhile,haspaidlittleattentiontothecontextualsignificance
ofthestatues’dramaticemotionaldisplaybeyondacknowledgingitsnovelty;16
mostscholarshavefocusedonstylisticrelationshipswithotherprograms,ques-
tionsofdating,andproblemsoforiginallocationandarrangement.17
Mypaperisconcernedlesswithquestionsoforiginsthanwithquestionsof
effects–ofthepsychologicalpressurethefiguresexert,throughtheirbodilydy-
namism,onembodiedbeholderswhoconfrontthemwithintheclosedconfines
oftheporch.AsIshowinthefirstsection,theVirgins’communicationofthe
parable takes place less through external attributes – garb, accessories, com-
portment,orothersignsofbodilydifference–thanthroughcorporealdemons-
13E.g.AndrewMartindale,GothicArt.London1967,61:»Thestyleofthesefiguresisunmis-
takablyGerman.Thesculptormadeaboldattempttoregistersuitablefacialexpressionsof
joy and despair; yet the desire to impress the spectator has outrun his sensitivity and it is
clearthatthestepfromlife-liketogrotesqueisashortone.«Theassociationofemotional
expressiveness with German identity is reminiscent of German writings prior to 1945, e.g.
Hermann Giesau, Sächsisch-thüringische Kunst als Wesensausdruck des mitteldeutschen
Menschen,in:Jb.derDenkmalpflegeinderProvinzSachsenundinAnhalt,1933/34,5–47,
20–25.
14JamesSnyder,MedievalArt:Painting,Sculpture,Architecture,4th–14thCentury.NewYork
1989,416,withreferencetotheFoolishVirginsonthe»façade[sic]ofMagdeburgC athedral.«
TheauthorcitestheseonlyinpassingduringadiscussionoftheconsiderablylaterVirgins
portalatStrassburg.
15C.StephenJaeger,MoralDisciplineandGothicSculpture:TheWiseandFoolishVirginsof
theStrassburgCathedral,in:C.StephenJaeger,TheEnvyofAngels:CathedralSchoolsand
SocialIdealsinMedievalEurope,950–1200.Philadelphia1994,331–348,343:»Thefaces[of
theFoolishVirgins]aretwistedingrotesqueexaggerationsofsuffering.«PaulBinski,The
AngelChoiratLincolnandthePoeticsoftheGothicSmile,in:ArtHistory20,1997,350–374,
355describestheVirginsas»register[ing]faciallyahomileticcontrastofmoralabsolutes,«
thoughheneithertakesaccountoftherangeofexpressionswithineachgroupnorexplains
whydemeanorsofhappinessorsadnessnecessarilyexpressmoralqualities.Theseissuesare
moral
takenupbelow.
16For a particularly enthusiastic description, see Hans Jantzen, Deutsche Bildhauer des
dreizehntenJahrhunderts.Leipzig1925,186–190.
17Forareviewoftheliteraturefromthefirsthalfofthe20thcentury,seeSiegfriedFliedner,
StudienüberdieehemaligeBrautpforteunddaserste(geplante)Gewändestatuenportaldes
MagdeburgerDomsnebsteinemExkursüberdasSüdportaldesStrassburgerMünsters,in:
SachsenundAnhalt17,1941–43,85–128.AsindicatedbyD.Schubert(asnote4),301–304,
littleofsignificancewasaddedtotheliteratureinthedecadesafterWorldWarII.Noessay
ontheVirginsappearsintheotherwisecomprehensivevolumeeditedbyUllmann(asnote3);
likewise, they are absent in the recent book: Hartmut Krohm (Hg.), Meisterwerke mittel-
alterlicherSkulptur.Berlin1996.
126 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Fig.2:MagdeburgCathedral.North
portal,leftjamb:WiseVirgins
(Photobyauthor.)
trationsofcontingent,interiorconditions:thatis,thefiguresdonotsomuch
displaytheirrespectivestatusthroughmaterialsignsasperform,throughtheir
bodiesandfaces,theirresponsestothatstatus.18Inturn,asIargueinthese-
condsection,thefigures’livelybodilyrhetoricservesnotonlytoindicateanar-
rativebutalsotochargethesurroundingspacewithsignificance,transforming
the living inhabitants into players in an ongoing drama that they themselves,
throughtheirphysicalmovement,mustbringtoitsconclusion.19Recognitionof
theMagdeburgVirginsgrouplessasadidactic,intellectualreminderoftheLast
Thingsthanasanembodiedspectacle,setinthehighlychargedzonebetween
sacredandprofanerealmsandaimedatbeholdersmovingthroughthatspace,
givesusnewconceptualtermswithwhichtoevaluateitsmeaning.
18ThisfirstaspectofwhatIseeasthefigures’performativityisborrowedfromthestudyofthe-
aterandritual;seeVictorTurner,FromRitualtoTheatre:TheHumanSeriousnessofPlay.
NewYork1982,esp.102–123andtheessayscollectedinPerformativityandPerformance,ed.
AndrewParkerandEveKosofskySedgwick.NewYorkandLondon1995.
19Thissecondaspectofperformativityderivesfromliterarycriticism,esp.J.L.Austin,Howto
DoThingswithWords.2ndedn.,ed.MarinaSbisaandJ.O.Urmson.Cambridge,Mass.1975.
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 127
Jung
Fig.3:MagdeburgCathedral.North
portal,rightjamb:FoolishVirgins
(Photobyauthor.)
Bodilysameness,psychologicalpresence,andmoralvirtue
TheoriginalplacementandconfigurationoftheMagdeburgVirginshaslong
been a central concern in the scholarly literature; empty bracket-holes in the
backsofthestatuesindicatethattheywererepositionedatleastoncebetween
thetimeoftheircreationandtheircurrentdisplay.Argumentshavebeenmade
fortheirintendedinclusiononanever-completedwestportal,onanearly(and
nowcompletelylost)choirscreen,andonthenorthtranseptportal,whichform-
edthemainentrancetothechurchatthetimeoftheircreation.20Mostscho-
20SeeW.Paatz,DieMagdeburgerPlastikumdieMittedesXIII.Jahrhunderts,in:Jb.derPreu-
ßischenKunstsammlungen46,1925,91–120.,100–104fortheproblemasitstoodin1925.
Fliedner(asnote17),85–88followsitthroughthe1940s,concludingthatthenorthtransept
musthavebeentheintendedsite.FritzBellmann,DieklugenundtörichtenJungfrauenund
derLettnerdesMagdeburgerDoms,in:FestschriftfürHaraldKellerzumsechzigstenGe-
burtstag. Darmstadt 1963, 87–110, proposed that the Virgins once stood at the balustrade
levelofthecathedral’schoirscreen,ahypothesisenthusiasticallyacceptedbyD.Schubert
(asnote4),302f.Archaeologicalinvestigationshaveuncoverednotracesofthe13th-century
screen,however,sothereconstructionsbybothBellmannandSchubertmustremainspecula-
128 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
larsagreethatthelatterpossibilityismostprobable,butwhateverthecasemay
be,theoriginalarrangementwasshort-lived.Sometimeinthefirstthirdofthe
fourteenthcentury,thefigureswererearrangedwithinanewlyenlargedportal
onthenorthtranseptarm,whichinturnwasenclosedwithinasquare,vaulted
porch known as the Paradise.21 Entering from the city through the northern
gateoftheporch,visitors–thenandnow–findthemselvesstandingbetween
largefiguresofSynagogueandEcclesia,whofacetheWiseandFoolishVirgins
atthedoorwaytothechurchproper.22
Moderncommentatorshavebeenquicktoexpressdisapprovaloftheearly
fourteenth-century installation of the jamb figures: the new consoles are too
shallow,causingtheVirgins’longdressestooverhangthemawkwardly,andthe
nichesenclosingthefigurestoonarrow,sothatelbowsandhipsthrustoutbey-
ond the architectural frame (figs. 2–3).23 Because the porch was designed to
house these very figures so soon after their creation, however, it makes little
sensetoattributethisrelationofarchitectureandsculptureinthecathedral’s
primaryentrancetoeithersloppyplanningoramisunderstandingofthefig-
ures’ aesthetic significance. Taken seriously, the formal and iconographic
choicesmadeduringthereinstallationprocessmayinfactshedcruciallighton
whatmedievalbeholdersfoundespeciallysalientandstrikinginthesefigures.
One aspect the younger portal designers clearly wished to highlight was
the statues’ plasticity, their robust physical presence despite their smaller-
than-lifesize.Whereastheoriginalmodeofpresentation–retainedinthese-
condVirginfromtheoutsideofeachjamb–assertedthefigure’sattachment
to the architecture, with feet emerging organically from delicate foliate con-
solesandbackspressedtightlyagainstcolumns,thenewarrangementsetthe
bodies emphatically apart from their supports. Precisely this much-maligned
disjunctionbetweensculptureandarchitectureservestoenhancethestatues’
corporeality, signaling a shift from conceiving the figures as extensions of
tive.Assuming the figures were meant to flank a portal, Lilli Burger, Die ursprüu
ungliche
Aufstellung der Magdeburger klugen und törichten Jungfrauen, in: Jb. für Kunstwissen-
schaft,1930,1–13,soughttoreconstructtheoriginaldispositionofthegrouponthebasis
of formal aspects of the individual figures. Lottlisa Behling, Die klugen und törichten
Jungfrauen zu Magdeburg: Nachträge und Ergänzungen zur Erforschung der Magdebur-
ger Skulpturen, in: Zeitschrift für Kunstwissenschaft 8, 1954, 19–42 attempted the same
throughananalysisoftheconsoles.
21SeeFliedner(asnote17).
22OntheEcclesiaandSynagoguefigures,seeD.Schubert(asnote4),299fandHelgaSciurie,
EcclesiaundSynagogeandenDomenzuStrassburg,Bamberg,Magdeburg,undErfurt:Kör-
persprachliche Wandlungen im gestalterischen Kontext, in: Beiträge zur mittelalterlichen
Kunst.FestschriftGerhardSchmidtzum70.Geburtstag.(=SonderausgabedesrrWienerJb.
fürKunstgeschichte46/47,1993–94,679–687,871–874.
23E.g.Burger(asnote20),1:Thefigures»wurdenohneRücksichtaufihrefrüheren nBedeutung
innerhalbdesPortalganzenindievielzuengenKehlendesneuenGewändesversetzt.Dies
aber konnte nicht geschehen, ohne ein Missverhältnis zwischen Figuren und Architektur
hervorzurufen.[...] Nochmehrstörendieinhäßss sslicherWeisefreiüberdieKonsolenhin-
ausstechendenGewandendenderFiguren.«
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 129
columns to imagining them as animated bodies moving freely in space.
Jung
The portrayal of the Wise and Foolish Virgins as individualized characters
withastrongdegreeofcorporealaswellaspsychologicalpresencewasadaring
departurefromaformalstructureandiconographyalreadywellestablishedby
the middle of the thirteenth century. The earliest surviving Virgins image in
GermanmonumentalsculptureappearsonthelinteloftheGalluspforteatBasel
Galluspforte
Münster(ca.1185).24Inthiscase,themetaphoricidentityofthemajesticresur-
rectedChrist,whowelcomessaintsanddonorstohissideinthemainfieldofthe
tympanum,withthebridegroombelow,whosimultaneouslyadmitsandrejects
thewomenatthedoor,isrevealedthroughthedirectverticalalignmentofthe
twofiguresalongthetympanum’sverticalaxis.ThegroupsofVirginsaredistin-
guishedfromoneanothernotonlybythehingedwoodendoorthatphysically
dividesthembutalsobyboththeirattributes–fulllampsbornelikeliturgical
chalices by the Wise, and empty ones held upside-down by the Foolish – and
theirgarb.TheFoolishapproachthedoorbareheadedandcladinclingydres-
seswithembroideredbodicesandlongskirtsthatmustbegatheredupasthey
walk, while the Wise approach Christ wearing the Gebende
Gebende of married women
andbaggy,body-concealingrobesthathangtotheirfeetinthick,chunkyfolds.25
TheBaselrenditionoftheparablewasnovelinitsspatialandnarrativeunity;
earlier sculptural depictions tended to employ a signative mode that empha-
sized the Virgins’ status not as real people enacting a story but as metaphors
fortheSavedandtheDamnedattheLastJudgment,usuallyportrayedinthe
tympanum above.26 In the version on the center portal of Saint-Denis, made
underthedirectionofAbbotSugerintheearly1140s,neithernarrativedrama
nor psychological immediacy was at issue.27 Here, the Virgins occupy narrow
microarchitecturalnichesstackedverticallytoeithersideofthedoor.Insteadof
interactingwithoneanotherordirectingtheirattentiontotheportal,theyface
squarelyoutward,demonstratingtheirrespectivefatesthroughthepositioning
oftheirlampsalone.28WhethertheVirginswerearrayedonthedoorpostsin
this manner, or, as in slightly later churches, in voussoirs
voussoirs alongside saints and
24SeeMauriceMoullet,DieGalluspfortedesBaslerMünsters.Basel/Leipzig1938.
25Onthisheadgear,seeJoachimBumke,HöfischeKultur:LiteraturundGesellschaftimhohen
Mittelalter.München1986,194f.
26In this respect they are structurally analogous to the figures in contemporary illuminated
manuscriptswhoseroleassubjectsofastorynarratedbyanothercharacter,ratherthanin-
dependentlyactingagents,ismanifestedbytheinsertionofscrollsorotherframingdevices,
asexplainedbyMichaelCamille,SeeingandReading:SomeVisualImplicationsofMedieval
LiteracyandIlliteracy,in:ArtHistory8,1985,26–48.Camille’sprimaryexampleofthisphe-
nomenon,aminiaturefromthePembrokeGospels,likewisedepictsaparablefromMatthew
(theUnpreparedWeddingGuest,Mt.22:11–12).
27SeePamelaZ.Blum,EarlyGothicSaint-Denis:RestorationsandSurvivals.BerkeleyandLos
Angeles1992,76–90.
28TheonlyfigureofthegroupthatisnotfrontallyorientedistheFoolishVirginonthelowest
register,whoseseturnsherheadtofacetheseminudeAtlantidinanadjacentniche;seeibid.,
77,Fig.25a.
130 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Fig.4:MagdeburgCathedral.
Gallerylevelofapse:statuesofSts.
MauriceandGeorgewithreliefsof
WiseandFoolishVirgins,ca.1230.
(Photobyauthor.)
angels,Frenchportalprogramswouldconsistentlyhighlightthefigures’psycho-
logical and physical detachment from one another and their clear separation
fromthegenuinely»acting«figuresonthetympanum.29
29For depictions of the Virgins on doorposts, see Willibald Sauerländer, Gotische Skulptur
inFrankreich,1140–1270.München1970,Tf.60–61(Sens,KathedraleSt-Etienne,mittle-
resWestportal,ca.1200),Tf.145(Paris,KathedraleNotre-Dame,mittleresWestportal,vor
1230), Tf. 160–161 (Amiens, Kathedrale Notre-Dame, mittleres Westportal, 1225–35), Tf.
286,oben(Auxerre,KathedraleSt-Etienne,ca.1270).Fordepictionsonarchivolts,seeTf.
243,links(Reims,KathedraleNotre-Dame,Nordquerhaus,Gerichtsportal,ca.1230,where
the Virgins sit alongside saintly clerics and angels), Tf. 288 (St-Thibault-en-Auxois, Prio-
ratskirche Notre-Dame, Nordquerhausportal, 1240–50, where the Virgins accompany Old
Testamentscenes),Tf.298–299undAbb.109(Poitiers,KathedraleSt-Pierre,rechtesWest-
portal,ca.1250,wheretheyaccompanysaints),Tf.300–301(Charroux,ehem.Abteikirche
St-Sauveur,ca.1250,FigurenausdenArchivoltendesmittlerenWestportals),Tf.308–309
(Dax,KathedraleNotre-Dame,ehem.Westportal,drittesViertel13.Jh.).Onthewestfaçade
ofBourgesCathedral(1240–60),theVirginsoccupythespandrelsoftheblindrosewindow
inthecenterportalgable;seeTf.292.
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 131
This mode of depiction was not unknown to the artists who produced the
Jung
Magdeburgportalinthemid-thirteenthcentury.Around1230,notlongbefore
thearrivalofthisworkshopatthecathedral,tenshallowreliefsoftheVirgins,
possiblymeantfortheimpostsofanever-finishedportal,hadbeeninsertedinto
thewalloftheBischofsgangsurroundingtheapse,alongwithsmallerreliefsof
Bischofsgang
theVirtuesandVices,stockyfiguresofthemalesaints,andnicheshousingrelics
(fig. 4).30 In keeping with the somber demeanor of the large-scale saints, the
apseVirginslookeverybitasstoicastheircounterpartsinthenorthtransept
portallookpassionatelyengaged.Cladinflowing,toga-likegarments,thefron-
talfiguresgazecalmlyoutward,demonstratingtheirSavedorDamnedstatus
notthroughtheirfacesbutthroughthephysicalpositioningoftheirhandsand
lamps.
Whereasthesmallsize,stylizedform,andabsenceofpsychologicalcomplex-
ityintheapsereliefsare,arguably,moreappropriatetotheVirgins’metapho-
ricnaturethanthelively,fleshed-outfiguresofthenorthtranseptportal,the
absenceofexternalindicatorsofmoraldifferenceinthelatterbringsoutmore
clearlytheideaofinteriormotivationthathadlongbeencrucialintheologi-
calexplicationsoftheparable.Thelackofclearmoraldistinctionamongthe
Virgins–who,afterall,attendedtheBridegroom’sarrivalwithequalenthusi-
asm – posed problems for commentators who sought to harmonize the story
with Christ’s own eschatological gloss, and there was little agreement as to
whatthedetailsofthestoryactuallymeant.Whatseemstohaveespeciallyin-
triguedearlyinterpreterswasthattheFoolishVirgins’problemarosenotfrom
anythingtheydidbutfromsomethingtheydidnot
did have.MuchofAugustine’s
sermon on Matthew 25:1–13, for example, sought to explain the rejection of
fivewomenwhobothwerevirgins(i.e.,puresoulsthatabstainedfromillicit
sensualimpressions)andpossessedlamps(i.e.,goodworks);theoiltheFoolish
lacked,hereasoned,wascharitas,thelovethatmustaccompanygoodworksif
30Inaninfluentialarticle,AdolfGoldschmidtproposedthatallthefiguresinthisapsepro-
gramweredesignedforaFrench-styleportal;seehisFranzöszzischeEinflüsseinderfrühgo-
tischen Skulptur Sachsens, in: Jb. der Königlich Preußischen Kunstsammlungen 20, 1899,
285–300. Much of the subsequent literature has focused on reconstructing such a portal.
Foranoverviewofthestateofthequestion,withfullbibliography,seeKlausNiehr,Diemit-
teldeutscheSkulpturdererstenHälftedes13.Jahrhunderts.Weinheim1992,296–302.In
hisprovocativearticleZentrum,Peripherie,Transperipherie.ÜberlegungenzumErfolgdes
gotischenFigurenportalsandenBeispielenChartres,Sangüesa,Magdeburg,Bambergund
denWestportalendesDomesS.LorenzoinGenua,in:HerbertBeckundKirstenHengevoss-
Dürkop(Hg.),EuropäischeSkulpturim12./13.Jahrhundert.Frankfurt/M.1994,665–687,
671,PeterCorneliusClaussenremindedusthattheportalprojectwasinitiatedbyArchbishop
AlbrechtII,whostudiedinParisatthetimethehistoriatedportalwasbecomingnormativein
France.ClaussensuggeststhatAlbrecht’sattemptto»transplant«theFrenchportalstructure
intoMagdeburg»wurdeabgestoßen«not,ashastraditionallybeenheld,becauseofachange
inworkshoporalackoffinancesbutrather»weildieGrundvoraussetzungfürdasKonzept
Figurenportal,diekulturelleÜbereinkunft,fehlte«–hencethefigures’removaltotheapse
interior.Itisnoteworthy,inlightofClaussen’slargerargumentsinthisarticle,thattheFiguren-
132 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
theyaretocarryweight.31ForIsidoreofSeville,theFoolishVirginsfailednot
toperformgoodworks,buttostoretheevidenceofthoseworksintheircons-
ciences–inIsidore’swords,to»displaythesplendoroftheirmindsinthevases
of their hearts.«32 Later commentators added further nuances. Thus Hugh of
St.Victor,writinginthetwelfthcentury,placedgreaterstressoninternalinten-
tionality,contrastingtheWiseVirgins,whosoughttoobtaingoodconscience
ratherthanhumanpraise,withtheFoolish,whoperformedgooddeedstoearn
humanpraiseratherthangoodconscience;thusitwasnottheirlackofoilbut
theirrushtothevendors,distributorsofpraise,thatcausedtheFoolishVirgins’
downfall.33 Foralltheirdisparitiesintimeandplaceandthesubtledifferences
ininterpretation,these(andmanyother)commentatorsagreedthatthedivi-
dinglineseparatingtheVirginswasafineone;salvationandrejectionresulted
fromneitherinnatemoraldisparitynorfromouterbehaviorintheworld,but
fromthesecretmotivationsofthehumanheart.
Prior to the Magdeburg portal, depictions of the Wise and Foolish Virgins
smoothedoverthecomplexitiesandnuancesoftheparableanditsexegetical
interpretations by attaching to the figures external signs suggestive of moral
value.Aswehaveseen,theWiseVirginsintheBischofsgangweredistinguished
Bischofsgang
bythetoga-likewrappingoftheirdraperyandbytheveilingoftheirheads,in
contrastwiththemodernfashionsandloose,flowinghairoftheFoolish. 34At
thesametimetheMagdeburgportalfigureswerebeingconstructed,artistselse-
where were experimenting with using body language to contrast the groups’
respective moral qualities. The Foolish Virgins that once graced a portal on
the abbey church of St-Sauveur at Charroux (ca. 1250), at least one of whom
wearstheheaddressofamarriedwoman,brandishtheiremptyvasesproudly,
revealingtheirfoolishnessthroughinappropriatelycheerysmilesandpreening
poses,whiletheWiseVirginswraptheircloaksdiscreetlyaboutthemselvesand
gaze outward with faces devoid of overt emotion.35 As C. Stephen Jaeger has
argued,theelevationofrestrainedandelegantbehavioragainstimmoderateor
portalthatwascreated–thatoftheWiseandFoolishVirgins–runscompletelycounterto
was
Frenchtraditions,withitsmonumentalizationofasingleepisoderatherthananassemblyof
many,anditsemphasisonpsychologicalaspectsofhumanexperienceratherthanonobjec-
tiveintellectualconcerns.
31Augustine,SermoXCIIIadpopulum,in:PL38,cols.573–580.
32IsidoreofSeville,AllegoriaequaedemscripturaesacraeCXCVII–CXCVIII,in:PL83,cols.
123f.
33HughofSt.Victor,AllegoriaeinNovumTestamentum,liberII,cap.XXXIV,in:PL175,cols.
799f.HughandothercommentatorstendnottoaddressthefactthattheFoolishVirgins’
journeytotheoilvendorscouldhavebeenavoidediftheWiseVirginshadagreedtoshare
withthem.
34ThesensuouslyswayinggroupsatSens,ca.1200,arelikewisedistinguishedbyvarietiesof
dress:theWiseconcealtheirupperbodiesthroughlooselydrapedsmockswhilethechests
andwaistsoftheFoolisharerevealedthroughtight-fitting,belteddresses;seeSauerländer
(asnote29),Tf.60–61.
35Ibid.,Tf.300–301.
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 133
inappropriateexpressivity,whichwasastapleofethicaltrainingineleventh-cen-
Jung
turycathedralschools,alsofoundvisualformintheWiseandFoolishVirgins
program at Strassburg Cathedral, produced around 1280. 36 In the Strassburg
program,andthecloselyrelatedversionatFreiburgCathedral,themoraldis-
paritybetweenthegroupsismadebrashlyobviousthroughtheintroductionof
aChristfigure,whobeckonstheWiseVirginstowardthedoorofthechurch,
and,onthesideoftheFoolish,aworldlyprincewhosecourtlygarmentscannot
concealanakedbacksidecrawlingwithvermin.37
Nosuchindicationsofmoralstatusappearintheportalensembleat
Magdeburg; unlike their cousins at Strassburg, these figures cannot be con-
fusedwithpersonificationsofvirtueandvice.38Indeed,whatmakestheMagde-
burgfiguressoaudaciousispreciselythegroup’sphysicaluniformity–afactor
wellinkeepingwiththeologicalinterpretations,which,aswehaveseen,located
theFoolishVirgins’faultinthedomainofimperceptibleinternalmotivations
ratherthaninvisibleoutwardacts.Eachfigure–notonlytheFoolish–models
thefashionablegarbofamoderncourtlylady:underneathaheavymantleshe
wearsalong-sleevedgownwhoseclingybodice,enhancedbyajeweledbrooch,
issetofffromthevoluminousskirtbyathinleathergirdle.39Likemalewriters
ofcourtlyliteraturesuchasKonradvonWürzburg,whoexpressedgreatenthusi-
asmfortherichcontrastsofsleeknessandfullness,exposureandconcealment,
inherentinthiscostume,theMagdeburgsculptorsdidnotfailtonotehowthe
thinfabricofthebodicesallowedeachlady’s»senftenbrüstelînandemkleidereine
î
storzenhartekleine,alsezzwênepfelwaeren
ê ,«40orthewaythelongskirtassumed
»vilmanegenwünneclichenvalt«asitcascadedinhillsandvalleysacrossherfeet
(»reht,«hecontinues,»alseinbildegesnitzet«).41WhiletheFoolishVirginsusethe
hemsoftheircloakstowipetearsfromtheireyes,theWisehooktheirfingers
through their mantle-straps in a gesture associated with the highest levels of
courtlyrefinement(fig.5),orstrategicallymanipulatetheircloakstocallatten-
tiontotheirhipsandtorsos.Virginstheymaybe–butintheirself-assuredflirta-
tiousnessthesefigureshavelessincommonwiththeirnun-likecounterpartson
theBischofsgangthantheydowiththewell-bredladiesinsecularpoetry,whotease
Bischofsgang
36Jaeger(asnote15).
37SeeOttoSchmitt,Diegotischen nSkulpturdesStraßss
ssburgerMünsters.Frankfurt1924,Bd.
I,22–26undBd.II,Tf.129–151.Tomyknowledgenoexplanationhasbeenadvancedasto
whytheVirgins’traditionalpositionsrelativetothedoorhavebeenreversedatStrassburg,
sothattheWisestandonthedoor’sproperleftandtheFoolishontheright.OntheFreiburg
program, see Gustav Münzel, Der Skulpturenzyklus in der Vorhalle des Freiburger Müns-
ters,Freiburg/Br.1959,142–146andRudolfAsmus,Der»FürstderWelt«inderVorhalledes
MünstersinFreiburgi.B.,in:RepertoriumfürKunstwissenschaft35,1912,509–512.
38SeeJaeger(asnote15),whoconflatestheVirginswithvirtuesandvices(see331,339).See
alsoBinski(asnote15),255.
39SeeBumke(asnote25),189–197.Behling(asnote20)notesthat,contrarytomostdepic-
tions,theWiseVirginshereareactuallymorelavishlyornamentedthantheFoolish.
40KonradvonWürzburg,Engelhard,ll.3046–3047;quotedinBumke,192.
41KonradvonWürzburg,Engelhard,ll.3062–3077;quotedinBumke,193.
134 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Fig.5:MagdeburgCathedral.
DetailofWiseVirgins.
(Photobyauthor.)
theiradmirersbyoccasionallypullingasidetheirmantlessothat,asWolframvon
Eschenbachputit,»swes ouge denne drunder dranc, der sah den blic von pardîs
î .«42
Thus,incontrasttothecarversofthegalleryreliefs,theyoungerportalsculp-
torsaffirmedtheVirgins’essentialsamenessbymakingthemconformequallyto
courtlyidealsofphysicalbeauty.Eventhelamps,thoseubiquitoussignsoffailure
orplenitude,dolittletodifferentiatethegroups:whiletheFoolishVirginclosest
tothedoortipshersoutward,offeringaglimpseofitsemptycenter,therestcup
theirsasifinthestubbornhopethatallisnotlost.Nordoestheirbodilycomport-
mentdistinguishthewomen’srespectivemoralqualitiesinanyessentialway.In
contrasttoprogramssuchasthatatStrassburg,wheretheliteraluprightnessand
sobrietyoftheWiseVirginsaffirmtheirspiritualsuperiorityovertheclumsyand
immoderateFoolish,43atMagdeburgthetwogroupsperformgesturesthatare
equalinbothconventionalityandexpressiveness.TheWiseVirgins’mannered
42WolframvonEschenbach,Willehalm,ll.12–15,quotedinBumke(asnote25),196.
43SeeJaeger(asnote15).JeffreyF.Hamburgerhasnotedthesamephenomenoninthede-
pictionoftheVirginsintheRothschildCanticles(ca.1300),thoughheretheyappearina
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 135
Jung
Fig.6:MagdeburgCathedral.
DetailofFoolishVirgin.
(Photobyauthor.)
playwithclothingsuggestsmindsfreefromexternalworry,whilethegesturesof
theFoolishadherequiterigorouslytoalong-standingvisualandliteraryicono-
graphyofgrief:liketheprincesseswhomournlostloversinsecularpoetryorlike
thecompanionsofChristindevotionalliterature,thewomenbeattheirbreasts
andforeheads,dabtheireyes,andcradletheircheeksintheirhands(fig.6).44
Farfromrepresentingirrational,spontaneousoutburstsoffeeling,theVir-
gins’ bodily displays of emotion are better understood, like the often violent
outbursts described in much medieval history-writing, as demonstrative acts
of public communication meant to highlight the seriousness of a situation.45
narrativecontext;seehisTheRothschildCanticles:ArtandMysticisminFlandersandthe
Rhinelandcirca1300.NewHaven1990,57–59andFig.21.Foramoreextensivetreatment
ofmedievalgesturalrhetoric,seeJean-ClaudeSchmitt,Laraisondesgestesdansl’Occident
médiéval.Paris1990.
44SeeMosheBarasch,GesturesofDespairinMedievalandEarlyRenaissanceArt,NewYork
1976;ErhardLommatzsch,DarstellungvonTrauerundSchmerzinderaltfranzösischenLi-
teratur,in:ZeitschriftfürromanischePhilologie43,1923,20–67.
45Ontheinstrumentalizationofemotionsasasigninmedievalcommunication,seeGerdAlt-
hoff,Empörung,Tränen,Zerknirschung:»Emotionen«inderöffentlichenKommunikationdes
136 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Fig.7:MagdeburgCathedral.
DetailofFoolishVirgin.
(Photobyauthor.)
hereasmoderncommentatorshavedecriedtheFoolishVirginsasrepresen-
W
ting »grotesque exaggerations of suffering,« medieval audiences, more accus-
tomedtoexternalizedandhighlystylizedperformancesoffeeling,wouldlikely
haveunderstoodthemassignsofthedepthandgravityofthelossathand.46This
ishowemotionsareusedintheEisenachZehnjungfrauenspiel,atexttobediscus-
Mittelalters,in:FrühmittelalterlicheStudien30,1996,60-79andtheessayscollectedinAnger’s
Past:TheSocialUsesofanEmotionintheMiddleAges,ed.BarbaraH.Rosenwein.Ithacaand
London1998.Forafascinatinganthropologicalanalysisofthisphenomenonintheearlymod-
ernperiod,seeWilliamA.ChristianJr.,ProvokedReligiousWeepinginEarlyModernSpain,
in:ReligiousOrganizationandReligiousExperience,ed.JohnDavis.London1982,97–114.
46Forcommentsonthechangesinsensibilitythathaveledtothemodernemphasisonprivacy
andauthenticityinthedisplayofemotions,seeAlthoff(asnote45),78–79.OnthispointI
departfromJaeger(asnote15),whosuggeststhatthesadnessapparentintheFoolishVir-
gins’bodiesandfacesatStrassburg,becauseitrepresentstheoppositeofelegantandrefined
behavior,revealstheirmoralinadequacy.Heis,ofcourse,righttoinsistthatthesefigures
functionasakindofanti-model–whowouldwishtoenactthesewomen’ssorrow?–butwhe-
thertheirbentheadsandfurrowedbrowsmarkthemasinherentlybadisstillopenforques-
tion.Iaddressthisissuefurtherinmyarticle»TheEloquentBodyinMedievalSculpture«,in
preparation.
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 137
Jung
Fig.8:MagdeburgCathedral.
DetailofFoolishVirgin.
(Photobyauthor.)
sedfurtherbelow;there,theseeminglybombasticactionsoftheFoolishVirgins
–whichincluderendingofhair,tearingofclothing,beatingofbreasts,andvio-
lentweepingthatyieldedmoretears»als wassers ist in dem mere«47–areenactedas
appropriatemanifestationsofthecharacters’desolation.Onlyextremeactions,
afterall,canadequatelyconveythehorrorofbeingbarredfromheaven.
WhatgivestheformulaicgesturesoftheMagdeburgWiseandFoolishVirgins
theirpsychologicalimmediacyis,ofcourse,theirconjunctionwithfacialexpres-
sions of unprecedented range and liveliness. The Wise gaze boldly at viewers
–andattheirsorrowfulcounterparts–fromeyescrinkledintonarrowslitsby
theupwardpressureoftheirfullcheeks,theenergyoftheirgrinstemperedby
calm,finelyarchedeyebrowsandsmoothforeheads(seefigs.2,5).48Theeyesof
theFoolish,bycontrast,seembarelyabletosee,soheavilyaretheysqueez-edto-
getherbetweentear-swollenlids;theirlipspulldownward,echoingtheconcave
47EisenacherZehnjungfrauenspiel(asnote57),42,ll.510,514–517.Forfurtherdiscussion,see
below.
48Therangeofmeaningsofsmilesandlaughter–including,prominently,theerotic–incon-
temporaryliterarysourcesisexploredbyKarlRichardKremer,DasLacheninderdeutschen
SpracheundLiteraturdesMittelalters.Ph.D.Diss.Bonn1961.
138 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
curves of the furrowed eyebrows, and their dimpled chins appear to tremble
(figs. 6–8).49 These expressions come to view all the more powerfully thanks
tothefigures’otherwisenearlyidenticalfacialstructure.Onbothsidesofthe
door,wefindthesameheart-shapedfaces,dimpledcheeks,longeyesframedby
puffylids,andfull,softlycurvedlips–»sodass,«asErnstSchubertwrylynoted,
»manbeiflüchtigemHinsehenmeinenkönnte,eshabenureineeinzigeJungfraugegeben,
undsieseiverzehnfachtworden.«50Yettosuggestthatthissamenessindicatesalack
ofinventivenessonthepartofthesculptorsistodisregardtheastonishingphy-
siognomicexperimentselsewhereinthecathedral.AsthemagnificentAfrican
SaintMaurice,nowinthechoir,makesplain,theartistsactiveinMagdeburg
mid-centurywerehardlyshywhenitcametorenderingdiversephysicalappea-
rances. 51 At a historical moment when these sculptors, along with their more
celebratedpeersatNaumburgandReims,weresoboldlyexpandingtheartistic
repertoireoffacialtypes,andwhenphysiognomistswereseekingtouncoverin
thesetofaneyebrowortheshapeofanostrilindicationsofinborntempera-
ment,thephysicalsamenessoftheWiseandFoolishVirginsmustberegarded
asaconsciousandmeaningfulchoice.
Acomparisonofthetreatmentsofphysiognomyinthesesculpturesandin
the scientific writings of Albertus Magnus, who spent time in Magdeburg in
1263,isinstructiveinthisregard. 52AlthoughAlbertdidnotdifferfromhiscler-
icalcontemporariesincondemningimmoderatelaughter,hediscernedinthe
»softlylaughingandswolleneyes«ofapersonwhose»entirefaceis...dissolved
injoy«anaturethatis»good,grand,just,mild,religious,hospitable,pleasant,
prudent,gentle,andloving.«53Likehisclassicalpredecessors,Albertextolledthe
eyeoverotherfacialfeaturesasthe»gatewaytothesoul«and»truemessenger
oftheheart«–butinhiswritingsheconstantlyelidedtheexpressivecapacities
oftheeyeasanobjectpossessingcertainphysicalpropertieswiththoseofthe
eye’schangingmovementseffectedbyasentientagent.ByendowingtheVirgins
withthesamedistinctiveeyesandfaces,theMagdeburgsculptorssuccessfully
accentuated the muscular movements produced by various emotional states.
This presupposes a clear conceptual distinction between the intrinsic, immu-
tablestructureofthefaceandthecontingentandtransitorypositioningofits
features,onenotmadeconsistentlyincontemporaneousscientificdiscourse. 54
49Forcorrespondingliteraryrepresentationsofweepingincontemporarysources,seeHeinz
Gerd Weinand, Tränen: Untersuchungen über das Weinen in der deutschen Sprache und
LiteraturdesMittelalters.Bonn1958.
50E.Schubert1974(asnote4),202.
51Seeibid.,66–67andGudeSuckale-Redlefsen,Mauritius:DerHeiligeMohr–TheBlackSaint
Maurice.Houston/München1987,42–47.
52Kenneth F. Kitchell, Jr. and Irven Michael Resnick, Introduction: The Life and Works of
AlberttheGreat,intheirtranslationofAlbertusMagnusonAnimals:AMedievalSumma
Zoologica.Vol.I.Baltimore1999,3–17.
53Ibid.,Bd.I,Book1,par.157,105.
54ThisdistinctionanditsimplicationsforvisualarthavebeendiscussedbyE.H.Gombrich,
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 139
Drama,motion,andthebeholder’sshare
Jung
Whileexperimentsincapturingtheappearanceoftransientexpressionswere
well underway in the margins of mid-thirteenth century art – witness the fa-
mous»masks«atReimsCathedral55–theelevationofemotionalresponsetothe
centralsubjectofrepresentationatMagdeburgwassomethingnew,andthede-
signersofthefourteenth-centuryportal,whochosetoamplifythephysicaland
psychological immediacy of the figures by detaching them from the architec-
ture, clearly recognized its dramatic potential. Although »theatricality« has
beendescribedasthehallmarkofaspecificallymodernworldview,56itishardly
anachronistictounderstandtheeffectofthestagingoftheMagdeburgVirgins
as performative or theatrical rather than descriptive or didactic. In the very
yearsthenewporchwasbeingconstructed,alengthyvernaculardramatization
oftheWiseandFoolishVirginsparable–thefirstofitskindtohavesurvived
fromtheMiddleAges–washeatinguppublicstagesintheneighboringregion
ofThuringia. 57In1321,anespeciallyemotiveproductioninEisenachachieved
specialfamefortheimpactithadonlocalpolitics. 58Accordingtotheearliest
reportinthechronicleofSt.PeterinErfurt,theinsufficiencyoftheFoolishVir-
gins’tearfulentreaties,aswellastheVirginMary’sontheirbehalf,togainthem
admittancetotheweddingfeastmovedtheThuringianlandgraveFriedrichder
FreidigetoangrilyexpressdoubtsabouttheChristianfaith. 59Afterfivedaysof
TheMaskandtheFace:ThePerceptionofPhysiognomicLikenessinLifeandinArt,in:Art,
Perception,andReality,byE.H.Gombrich,JulianHochberg,andMaxBlack.Baltimoreand
London1972,1–46.
55Sauerländer(asnote29),Tf.257. SeealsoMichaelCamille,ImageontheEdge:TheMargins
ofMedievalArt.Cambridge,Mass.1992,77–85onexperimentation»inthemarginsofthe
cathedral«;foranotherperspective,seeRichardHamann-MacLean,KünstlerlaunenimMit-
telalter,in:FriedrichMöbiusandErnstSchubert(Hg.),SkulpturdesMittelalters:Funktion
undGestalt.Weimar1987,385–452.
56E.g. William Egginton, How the World Became a Stage: Presence, Theatricality, and the
QuestionofModernity.AlbanyNY,2003andMichaelFried,AbsorptionandTheatricality:
PaintingandBeholderintheAgeofDiderot.ChicagoandLondon1980.
57DasEisenacherZehnjungfrauenspiel.Hrg.v.KarinSchneider.(=TextedesspätenMittelal-
tersundderfrühenNeuzeit,17).Berlin1964.Thetextwasthefocusofarecentphilological
investigationbyRenateAmstutz,Ludusdedecemvirginibus:RecoveryoftheSungLiturgical
CoreoftheThuringianZehnjungfrauenspiel.Toronto2002.
58TheincidentiscitedinmostdescriptionsoftheMagdeburgVirginsasproofoftheemotional
effects of this parable on contemporary beholders, though its truth value has rarely been
questioned.MarkChinca,Toutexemplecloche.ErzählenvomTodeFriedrichsdesFreidigen
inMittelalterundfrüherNeuzeit,in:ZeitschriftfürdeutschePhilologie,123,2004,341–364
discussesthevarietyofaccounts,callingattentiontotheirliteraryconstructed-nessandthe
didactic value they served for their respective textual communities. I am grateful to Dr.
Chincaforprovidingmewithacopyofhispaperasitwenttopress.
59CronicaS.PetriErfordensismoderna(ca.1410),ed.OswaldHolder-Egger,in:Monumenta
Germaniae Historica, SS, 30, vol. I, 449; quoted in Chinca (as note 58), appendix, source
1.AsimilaraccountisrelatedinGermanbyJohannesRothe,ThüringischeLandeschronik
(1487),quotedinibid.,appendix,source2.
140 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
fuming,Friedrichsufferedastrokethatlefthimincapacitatedforthreeyears,
duringwhichtimehiswifeassumedpowerintheregion.Lateraccountsofthe
incidentalteredthedetailstoplacetheblameforFriedrich’sdistressontheex-
pressivityoftheperformanceitselfratherthanitstheologicalimplications;thus
hisstrokewaspresentedashavingbeentriggeredbyhisexcessiveempathywith
theFoolishVirgins’grief.60
Oneneednotassignobjectivetruth-valuetosuchaccountstorecognizethat,
foralltheirrhetoricalcalculation,theircommonassumptionthattheplaycould
provokepassionateresponsesinbeholderswasnot,initself,far-fetched;thetext
oftheEisenachplayrepeatedlycallsonviewerstoexperienceitempathetically.
TheperformanceculminatesintheFoolishVirgins’directaddressoftheaudi-
ence,whereintheybeseechviewerstoidentifywiththemand,throughthatvi-
cariousemotionalexperience,torecognizetheimportanceofproperliving: 61
Nühoret,selgen,dynüleben:
N
Wysynvchczüeymespigelegegebyn,
Daziebildebyunsnemet
Undwartetfliziclichen,wyielebit.(Z.470–73)
AstheFoolishsuggest,thegoaloftakingthemasanimageormodelduring
the course of the play is, in fact, to reject them as a model when normal life
resumesaftertheperformance.Thustheycontrastthemselves,intheirpresent
abjectcondition,withtheiraudienceinthefuturewhomight,through»proper
penitence,«avoidsuchafate:
Irsultanvwernlebendentagen
Gotundsynemutervoroügenhaben.
ü
Wywonden,wysoldenlangeleben;
Deswoldewirarmentorennichtnachgotishuldenstreben.
Dertotwasunsvorborgen.
Desmuzzewyarmenvmmersorgen
Vundpynelideaneeynde.
Eya,nüwynditvwerehende,
Alle,dynüinsundenleben,
Vndbetetgot,dazhervcheyngüteyndegeben
Undrechterüwevmmevweresunde!(Z.474–84)
wevmmevweresunde!
60Konrad Stolle remarks about Mary’s and the saints’ fruitless intercession on behalf of the
weepingVirgins:»dittewasetwaszuhartegespelt;
dittewasetwaszuhartegespelt «seeibid.,appendix,source3.
«
61AsMartinStevenshaspointedout,thedirectaddressofanaudiencebycharactersinmedie-
valdramaswashardlyanunusualphenomenon;intheTowneleyCrucifixion,forexample,
Christhimselfadmonishes»youpepyllthatpassmeby,/thatledeyourelyfesolykandly,/heyfevp
»
yourehartysonhight!«.SeeStevens,IllusionandRealityintheMedievalDrama,in:College
English32,1970–71,448–464,455.Foranextendeddiscussionofexemplarityinaccountsof
theEisenachplay,seeChinca(asnote58).
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 141
When,atpreciselythesametimethisplaywasattainingregionalfame,the
Jung
clergyofMagdeburgCathedraldecidedtoenclosetheirsculptedVirginswithin
aclearlyboundedarchitecturalspaceandsetthemintoadynamicrelationship
withbeholdersandwithotherstatues,weretheyseekingtocaptureandmake
permanently accessible the effects of a real performance? While the clergy’s
motivationsremainunclear(and,unlessfurtherwrittendocumentssurface,are
likelyunknowable),thisisinfactwhattheyachieved.62Intheporch,aphysically
liminalspacethatisnolongerworldandnotyetchurch,withEcclesiaandSy-
nagogueattheirbacks,theVirginsbeforetheireyes,andthedoorproviding
enticingglimpsesofthechurchinterior,viewersbecomepartofaninteractive
environment,akindofvirtualrealitywherenormaldistinctionsbetweensubject
andobject,animationandartificebluranddissolve.63
It is not only physically that the design of the porch places unusual de-
mands on beholders – for instance, in the way one must swivel around to see
Ecclesia and Synagogue – but conceptually as well. If, as commentators since
Emile Mâle have been quick to declare, the Virgins signify the Saved and
the Damned at the Last Judgment,64 this interpretation is one that must be
projected onto the Magdeburg ensemble by viewers familiar with that icono-
graphy; for, unlike the programs of French Gothic portals, this ensemble in-
cludesnoovertreferencetotheendoftime.Tobesure,thephysicallikeness
of the women to one another calls attention to the fact that their respective
responses are motivated
motivated – that they arise from within and address something
outside, rather than resulting inevitably from some innate moral status. But
incontrasttootherrenderingsofextremeemotionaldisplaysuchastheFü F rs-
tenportal ofBambergCathedral,whereitisChrist’sJudgmentthattriggersthe
62This was also noted by D. Schubert (as note 4), 302:»Solche Aufführungen [the Eisenach
Zehnjungfrauenspiel]werdenim14.JahrhundertdieAufstellungderMagdeburgerStatuenim
Paradies-Portalveranlaßss ssthaben.«Theperceptualpeculiaritiesofthespatialcontainment
of figural sculptures are touched on by Claussen (as note 30), 669 and 682, note 34:»Die
VorhallegibtderSkulptureinen›Handlungsspielraum‹,dermitihremursprünglichenmau-
ergebundenenKonzeptwenigzutunhat.«
63Forvaryingapproachestotheliminalasthestateinwhichnormalboundariesandrulestem-
porarilydissolve,seeArnoldvanGennep,TheRitesofPassage,trans.MonikaB.Vizedom
andGabrielleL.Caffee.Chicago1960;EdmundLeach,CultureandCommunication:The
LogicbywhichSymbolsareConnected.Cambridge1976;VictorTurner,TheRitualProcess:
StructureandAnti-Structure.NewYork1969,esp.94–130andVictorTurner,FromRitualto
Theatre(asnote18),esp.20–60.Foradiscussionofdoorsaspowerful»symbolsandatthe
sametimevehiclesofpassagefromtheonespacetotheother«inmanyreligions,seeMircea
Eliade,TheSacredandtheProfane:TheNatureofReligion,trans.WillardR.Trask.San
DiegoandNewYork1959,esp.24–29.
64Emile Mâle, Religious Art in France: The Thirteenth Century. Paris 1898, repr. Princeton
1984,202f:BasedonitsinterpretationintheGlossaOrdinaria,»[w]enowunderstandwhy
theparableoftheWiseandFoolishVirginswasalwaysassociatedwiththeLastJudgmentin
thethirteenthcentury.Theirpresencegivestothatterriblescenethesanctionofthedivine
word;itremindstheChristianthatChristhimselfforetolditinallitsdetailunderthetrans-
parentveilofsymbol.«
142 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Fig.9:Magdeburg
Cathedral.Tympanum,
ca.1300.(Photobyauthor.)
smiles of the Blessed and the grimaces of the Damned,65 the motivation for
theVirgins’responsesatMagdeburgremainsunseen.
Ordoesit?AswithsomanyFrenchportalensembles,thekeytothelower
portionsresidesabove,inthetympanum(fig.9).Itisperhapsnoaccidentthat
thetympanumoftheMagdeburgportalissorarelyreproducedinthescholarly
literature,foritsomissionofanyJudgmentimagerycomplicates,ifnotunder-
cuts,anydidacticinterpretationthatcaststheVirginsasunambiguousstand-ins
fortheElectandtheDamned.HeretheVirginMaryplaysthestarringrole;and
unlikeherdramaticcounterpartintheZehnjungfrauenspiel,sheappearsnotas
the(ultimatelyhelpless)intercessorbetweentheVirginsandChristbutasthesi-
multaneousbarrierandbridgebetweenheavenandearth.66Throughthescene
of her Assumption, the tympanum designers played on the two oppositions
alreadypresentinthedesignoftheporch:thatbetweenearthandheaven,em-
65ManfredSchuller,DasFürstenportaldesBambergerDomes.Bamberg1993.
66As Lehmann (as note 1), 57f explains, the inclusion of the Wise and Foolish Virgins in
Marian programs rather than Judgment cycles came to be normative in the German-
speakinglands.
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 143
bodiedbytherespectivespacesofcityandchurch,andthatbetweengriefand
Jung
joy,enacted,toeithersideofthedoor,bytheWiseandFoolishVirgins.Atthe
sametime,theyfoundthemeansofreconcilingthesedichotomies,visualizing
thepossibilityofpassagefromonesidetotheother–aconceptualmovewith
importantimplicationsforthemeaningofthejambfigures.
Astheportalasawholeisbisectedbytheopendoor,thetympanumsplits
horizontally into two distinct parts. In the lower register, the twelve apostles
gaze heavenward, conveying their sadness through facial expressions and sty-
lized gestures. One figure wrings his hands, one flings a hand upward, ano-
ther,likethecentralFoolishVirgin,restshishandonhischeek.Whereasthe
apostlesoneartharearrayedinlinearfashionaroundthematerialtokensof
theVirgin’serstwhilephysicalpresence,theupper,heavenlyzoneintroducesa
complexoverlappingofbodiesandaconcomitantcollapsingoftimes.Abovethe
emptycenterofthelowerregister,asmilingChrist,framedbyalight-filledman-
dorla,claspstheVirginsMary’stinysoulagainsthischestwhilehisfeetemerge
from behind the womb of his rising mother’s corpse. The fleshly body of the
Virgin,shownsimultaneouslyintheprocessofbecoming-absenttotheapostles
andbecoming-presenttoChrist,marksadualboundary:asthesourceofboth
theapostles’griefandChrist’smirth,italsoformsthephysical,thoughmobile,
boundarybetweenearthandheaven–astatusmadeexplicitthroughtheangels
who emerge from fluffy clouds at the tympanum’s lateral border to bear her
upward. By making Mary the point of convergence between these zones, this
formalarrangementrenderspalpabletheliturgicaltropeofMaryasporta coeli,
thegatewaytoheaven.67
Even if the biblical parable and its many glosses did not make clear that it
wastheVirgins’relationtoadoorthatultimatelydeterminedtheirfates,the
structuralcompositionoftheMagdeburgtympanum,withitstwozonesdivided
andlinkedbyanintermediaryobject,wouldsuggesttheiconographicimpor-
tance of the physical door at the formal center of the portal ensemble. The
absenceofajudgingChristoranyotherexplicitlydidacticelementhighlights
thedoor’sdualroleinthebiblicalstory:asasiteofpassage,itcausesthefaces
of the Wise Virgins to »dissolve in joy«; as an excluding barrier, it moves the
Foolish to violent sobs. Paradoxically, however, the convincing quality of the
figures’ transient psychological movements in response to the door also calls
attentiontotheirphysicalinabilitytopassthroughit.Theactualphysicalim-
mobilityoftheVirginsinspaceindeedupsetsthelogicofthebiblicalnarrative,
whichrequiredthatthetwogroupsnevermeetonthesamesideoftheportal.
Narrativerenditionsoftheparableinvariousmedia–forexample,thelintelof
67Onthismetaphor,seeCarolJ.Purtle,TheMarianPaintingsofJanvanEyck,Princeton1982,
6–8.IdiscusstheVirgin’sroleasdoor,anditsimplicationsofrealarchitecturalapertures,inmy
article,SeeingthroughScreens:TheGothicChoirEnclosureasFrame,in:Thresholdsofthe
Sacred:Architectural,ArtHistorical,LiturgicalandTheologicalPerspectivesonReligious
Screens,EastandWest,ed.SharonGerstel.Washington,D.C.,2006.
144 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Fig.10:Magdeburg
Cathedral.Northaisle,
rotunda:Seatedfigures
ofaroyalcouple(Sponsus
andSponsa),ca.1250.
(Photobyauthor.)
DYNAMICBODIESANDTHEBEHOLDER’SSHARE 145
theGalluspforteortheilluminationintheearlyfourteenth-centuryRothschild
Galluspforte
Jung
Canticles68–wereconsistentininterposingthedoorasabarrierbetweenthe
setsofmovingwomen.Asalarge-scaleensembleofsculpture,theMagdeburg
portalcannotshowthisspatio-temporalprogress;itdemandsinsteadthatview-
ersfleshoutthedetails,imaginingtheVirgins’movementasalreadyaccomplis-
hedandtheirresponsescarriedoutindefinitely.
Because the iconographically central door is also a functional part of the
architecture,the»beholder’sshare«doesnotstopwiththiskindofimaginative
projection.69 For in order to enter the church, viewers must pass through the
doorsthemselves;andthemomenttheycrossthatthresholdtheybecomeplay-
ersinthedrama,actualizing,atleastpotentially,themotiontowhichthesculp-
tedfigurescanonlyallude.70Forthoseabletopassintothechurch,theVirgins
musthaveappearednotonlyasfrighteningremindersoftheLastJudgmentbut
alsoasanoptimisticassertionoftheblessingsofentrance.Thisinterpretation
wouldhavebeenconfirmedbythepresence,inthenorthnaveaisle,ofthesculp-
ted figures of a Bride and Bridegroom, who receive their guests from within
afenestratedGothicrotunda andthusenablethelivingtobringtheVirgins’
dramatocompletion(fig.10).71JustasthetympanumimageofMary’smove-
mentfromearthtoheavenoffersasacredprototypeforthepassagefromcityto
church,sothelivelyperformanceoftheWiseandFoolishVirginsattheportal
amplifiesthesignificanceofviewers’ownphysicalmotion,remindingthemthat
ifthesorrowofexclusionisasstrongasthefiguresshowittobe,thenthejoyat
gainingentranceshouldbeallthegreater.
68SeeHamburger(asnote43).
69The phrase was famously introduced by E. H. Gombrich, Art and Illusion: A Study in the
PsychologyofPictorialRepresentation.2ndedn.Princeton1961.
70Theuseofsculptureandarchitecturetocreateaninteractivespatialenvironmentwouldnot
havebeenunusualinGermanyatthistime;theHolyGraveinSt.CyriakusinGernrode,in
whichlarge,moveablestuccofiguresoftheThreeMaryie ies,anangel,andabishopoccupy
a square chamber modeled on the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem, is a wonderful surviving
exampleofsuchaprogram.ThoughnocomparableexamplessurviveinFrance,thereisevi-
denceoftheirusethereaswell;atSt.LazareinAutun,sculptedfiguresenactedtheRaising
ofLazarusinanindependentenclosureinthechurch’sapse.SeeLindaSeidel,Legendsin
Limestone:Lazarus,Gislebertus,andtheCathedralofAutun.Chicago1999,33–62.
71These enigmatic figures have been variously interpreted as commemorative portraits of
Emperor Otto I and his wife Edith or of Christ and Mary-Ecclesia; see E. Schubert 1994
(as note 4), 84–86. Fliedner’s (as note 17) view that they must represent the latter pair is
confirmedbyRenateKroos,QuellenzurliturgischenBenutzungdesDomesundzuseiner
Ausstattung,in:Ullmann(asnote3),88–97,89.Thesmallrotundathathousesthefigures
contained an altar dedicated to the Assumption of the Virgin. For my purposes here, the
questionofthefigures’specificidentityismoot;whatisimportantisthattheyclearlydepict
amarriedcoupleand,assuch,representthegoaloftheWiseandFoolishVirgins’journey.
Fliedner presents the intriguing hypothesis that this pair occupied the tympanum of the
13th-century portal for which the Virgins were also made, and that they were removed to
the church interior with the construction of the Paradise porch. If this can be proved, it
would support my contention that the new portal was designed deliberately to position
beholdersasdramaticperformers.
146 BILDER,DIEZUKÖRPERNWERDEN
Acknowledgmentnote:
AversionofthispaperwaspresentedattheGermanHistoricalInstituteMedie-
valHistorySeminarinWashingtonDCinOctober2003.Fortheirlivelyengage-
mentwiththisworkIamgratefultoalltheparticipantsinthatevent,especially
GesineJordanandKristinMarek.CarolineBynumofferedcommentsandin-
sightsthathelpedmereshapethepaperinfruitfulways;toher,asever,Iowea
greatdebt.Thefinalstagesofrevisionswerecompleted-andnewpicturesofthe
Magdeburgsculpturesmade-duringmyfellowshipattheAmericanAcademyin
Berlininsping2006,andIthankthatinstitutionforitsgeneroussupport.