Sample 1- An Increase in The Production of Consumer

Goods Results in Damaging the Environment

The increased production of consumer goods has resulted in significant

damage to the environment. This problem is caused by various factors,
including the increased demand for consumer goods, the use of non-
renewable resources in the production process, and the disposal of waste
generated during the production and consumption of these goods.

One of the main reasons for the increased production of consumer goods is
the growing global population and the corresponding increase in demand for
these goods. As the population continues to grow, the demand for consumer
goods also increases, leading to increased production levels. Another cause is
the use of non-renewable resources in the production process. Many
consumer goods are made from non-renewable resources such as fossil fuels
and minerals, which have a significant impact on the environment. The
extraction and processing of these resources require energy-intensive
processes that emit harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases into the
atmosphere. The disposal of waste generated during the production and
consumption of consumer goods is also a significant contributor to
environmental damage. The improper disposal of waste can lead to pollution
of water sources, soil degradation, and air pollution.

To address this problem, a positive solution would be to adopt sustainable

production practices. Sustainable production involves using renewable
resources, reducing waste and pollution, and minimizing the use of non-
renewable resources. This can be achieved through various methods, such as
the use of renewable energy sources, the development of more efficient
production processes, and the adoption of circular economy principles. The
circular economy is a concept that aims to reduce waste and resource
depletion by using a closed-loop system. This involves designing products to
be reused, repaired, or recycled, reducing waste, and promoting the
sustainable use of resources.

In conclusion, the increased production of consumer goods has resulted in

significant environmental damage, including pollution and resource depletion.
The causes of this problem include increased demand for goods, the use of
non-renewable resources, and the improper disposal of waste. However, by
adopting sustainable production practices, such as the circular economy, we
can reduce the environmental impact of consumer goods production while
still meeting the demand for these goods.

Sample 2- An Increase in The Production of Consumer

Goods Results in Damaging the Environment

It is irrefutable that consumer items are an essential part of individual life;

however, increasing the amount of consumption of goods is detrimental to
national development as it is mainly because of plastic bags which can be
tackled by spreading awareness through administration.

Commencing with there are a plethora of reasons why escalating the figure of
consumer goods is injurious to nature. First and foremost, goods which are
utilised by the consumer are packed in polythene bags which is detrimental to
the environment. This is because plastic waste is made of deleterious
chemicals which is not solely harmful to humans but also to marine life. Take
Canada as an epitome, which showed plastic bags which are used for
consumer goods, are quite harmful. As a result, it is deconstructive
development.

Moving further, in order to tackle this grave issue, the authority should start an
awareness campaign and prohibit the usage of plastic bags, which is a positive
development for the environment as well as for humans. Besides this, the
lawmaker should make the alternative of plastic bags, such as paper bags,
rather than polythene. To epitome, in 2016 regime of the United kingdom
made the alternative of plastic in order to reduce the amount of plastic which
is harmful to consumer items. Consequently, it is also beneficial for holistic
development and brings drastic improvement in everyone’s life.

Having concluded, although plastic is quite inexpensive than other

alternatives, it is deleterious to the environment.