You are on page 1of 4

www.rsm.

nl/discovery

RSM DISCOVERY

4th Quarter 2015


Management Knowledge

ROTTERDAM SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, ERASMUS UNIVERSITY

Teaching by example Post-merger integration When and why


through case studies and the role of language consumers prefer
Tim Skelton talks with Bas Koene and Tao Yue fluency products from
Inter-organisational
By Joep Cornelissen and David P. Kroon user-driven firms
By Christoph Fuchs
trust: is more always The fairness perception of
better? bonus payment allocations The relevance of
By Merieke Stevens By Stephan Kramer innovating beyond
Learning to take the technology
By Kevin Heij
entrepreneurial
plunge
By Willem Hulsink and
Andreas Rauch

The business school that thinks


and lives in the future
www.rsm.nl/discovery

When and why consumers prefer


products from user-driven firms
By Christoph Fuchs

Management research has shown that involving customers in your field of open-source software, where
the unmet needs of a tech-savvy con-
product design can be an effective strategy. Muji furniture and
sumer community led to the develop-
Threadless apparel are just two examples of how powerful this strat- ment of open-source software that was
egy can be. Indeed, user-driven marketing strategies are being de- created for users by users – a commu-
ployed widely by a growing number of corporations, from Dell's crowd- nity of hobbyist programmers and pro-
fessionals willing to donate their time
sourcing initiatives to Starbucks' “Design your own Drink”.
and effort to designing statistical soft-
ware. Along with it came the beginning
of a revolution in the user/company
While giving your consumers a voice User-driven firms relationship. Firefox is perhaps one of
can certainly create value, this is not Companies have typically depended the greatest examples, relying on the
always the case. A plethora of counter- on managers for decisions relating to input of users to set up and improve
examples can demonstrate how inef- products and product design (with or on existing browsers and subsequent-
fectual user-driven tactics can be when without input from market research). ly becoming the dominant browser on
applied in the wrong circumstances. Now a growing number of companies the market.
So how, and when, is this a value- look to their user communities for di- In the years since, we have seen
adding strategy? rection on new product ideas or im- companies either embrace this trend
Together with Darren Dahl from provements, and market them as “us- by incorporating customers into their
the University of British Columbia in er-designed products” to the broader decision-making processes, or main-
Vancouver, and Martin Schreier from consumer market. tain traditional approaches to decision-
the WU Vienna University of Economics This strategy is both a smart re- making based on internal expertise. So
and Business, in Vienna, we designed sponse to an available resource and a what of these different approaches?
a series of studies examining precisely compelling one. So great is the power User-driven companies use their
when this strategy is effective. Previous of consumers today to influence sales customer base to generate new ide-
studies have focused on evaluating the and reputation that companies can and as for innovative products, improve
quality of user-driven products versus should engage with them in some form on existing products, and vote for the
designer-driven; we wanted to iden- or another. products that should be marketed on
tify consumer perceptions of these The firms that draw heavily on their a constant basis. These companies rely
products, namely, the reasons why users for everything from product de- strongly on their customers to create
consumers display a preference for sign to marketing have earned them- value and thus in the process aim to
user-driven products and under what selves the moniker “user-driven firms”. narrow the gap between consumer
specific circumstances. The first of these to emerge were in the needs and the end product.

“…a growing number of companies look to their user com-


munities for direction on new product ideas or improve-
ments, and market them as 'user-designed products'…”

4th Quarter 2015 | 17


RSM DISCOVERY
Management Knowledge

When and why consumers prefer


products from user-driven firms
By Christoph Fuchs

A good example is Chicago-based have, because the company has inte- put of every user, but only a selected
t-shirt company Threadless, which out- grated people just like you. group of users, a feeling of isolation
sources all t-shirt designs to its cus- Our research shows that this same or social exclusion for the observing
tomers who then vote on the best de- phenomenon applies to consum- consumers greatly diminishes any pos-
signs, which are subsequently printed. ers and user-driven product designs. itive effect.
The company has been one of the most Knowing people like themselves cre-
innovative firms in the US. ated these products leads consumers Implications for companies
More and more global organisa- to identify with and thus express a pref- The takeaway from this is that manag-
tions are incorporating user-driven erence for both product and company, ers should look carefully at their cus-
aspects into their business strategies. even without having participated in the tomer base and the expertise within it
These companies are recognising that design of the product itself. In other before choosing how to give their con-
in a society where consumers are inter- words, consumers prefer products sumers a voice in their organisation's
connected and powerful, it is smart to from user-driven firms when they feel processes. There are more ways than
integrate their voice into certain pro- they belong to similar demographics one of involving consumers.
cesses in the company. McDonald's re- or social groups. Take the example of high-status,
cently held a competition inviting fans The effect is reversed when social luxury brands. These companies would
to create new burger recipes that were identification is removed. If a com- perhaps be wise to distance their con-
eventually sold in their restaurants. pany acquires the input of a group of sumers from the design process,
But one size does not fit all when it users dissimilar to the broader cus- where most consumers are not design-
comes to how companies can derive tomer base, a negative effect can be ers but rather aspire to the design ex-
value from a consumer community. seen, where consumers prefer the pertise within the company, which is
These tactics don't work for all prod- products created by company design- considered elite and high status. But
ucts, or all companies. And now we ers than those of fellow and dissimilar
have some insights into why. product users.
But there are also other boundary
User-driven value conditions. Let's think of the example
In our research we found that con- of cars or perhaps more specifically, car
sumers display a clear preference for brakes. Most car buyers do not have
products from user-driven firms over the expertise to design car brakes,
designer-driven firms only when the have never seen car brakes designed,
products are designed by users with and do not know anybody who could
whom they identify. In the case of us- design them. In such a situation, user-
ers and product design, it all hinges on designed car brakes would have sig-
social identification. nificantly less appeal, where users are
Studies have shown that when peo- going to question the competence of
ple see others like themselves in posi- the person who designed the product,
tions of influence in a company, they as well as fail to relate to the designer.
experience a feeling of empowerment. Another interesting finding to come
This is a psychological phenomenon from our research is that the effect is
called basking in reflected glory. The diminished when the user-driven firm
theory is, even if you have not direct- is selective in its choice of user partici-
ly participated in anything, you could pants. If the firm is not open to the in-

18 | 4th Quarter 2015


www.rsm.nl/discovery

this does not mean that the company example, but there are a great many making the products more attractive.
cannot engage in other ways with their people with expertise in programming. Of course, whether consumer pref-
customers. Companies can give power With less complex products, such in erence for products from user-driven
to consumers via social media or by, the categories of clothing, furniture, firms under these conditions trans-
for example, inviting them to partici- food, toys, garden products and so on, lates into hard sales is an entirely dif-
pate in advertising campaigns. there is a great deal of room for user- ferent question. The implications of
With products that are less com- driven input. these perceptions for sales is a ques-
plex or where the product's consum- An effective tactic here is to use la- tion we intend to answer with our lat-
ers have considerable expertise in rela- belling to reveal the source of the de- est research project, on which we are
tion to the product, here we see room sign. Lego, for instance recently creat- collaborating with Japanese design
for involvement of users in the product ed a line of products labelled “created company Muji. But one thing that
design process and hence the creation by Lego fans”, even inviting fans to vote seems certain for now is that empow-
of a positive effect of preference within on favourites and give feedback. In this ering your customers by giving them
the wider customer base. Coming up way, the company entered a hypotheti- a voice in some area of your business,
with software products is not easy, for cal relationship with their customers, inevitably has a positive impact on your
brand's perception.

“If a company acquires the input of a group of This article draws its inspiration from
the paper Why and When Consumers
users dissimilar to the broader customer base, Prefer Products of User-Driven Firms: A
Social Identification Account, written
a negative effect can be seen…” by Darren W. Dahl, Christoph Fuchs
and Martin Schreier and published
in Management Science, 61(8):1978-
1988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/
mnsc.2014.1999

Christoph Fuchs is a visiting professor


at Rotterdam School of Management,
Erasmus University, and a Professor of
Marketing at TU Munich, Germany.
EMAIL cfuchs@rsm.nl

4th Quarter 2015 | 19

You might also like