Professional Documents
Culture Documents
memory (e.g., Atkinson & R. M. Shiffrin, 1968). Baddeley, (1986) characterised short-term memory
(STM) as a labile system with processes and storage that are distinct from those underpinning long-
term memory (LTM), which is responsible for the storage of knowledge in more durable form.
The distinction between STM and LTM has been supported by a number of observations.
Milner (1968) found that anterograde amnesic patients who demonstrate normal STM functioning can
also exhibit an inability to transfer information to, or retrieve information from, LTM. A double-
dissociation is observed with patients who have a very limited STM capacity, of as little as two items,
but have an intact LTM (e.g., Baddeley et al. 1988). The rapid loss of information in STM when
rehearsal, or the re-activation of information, is prevented has been argued to underscore the
importance of decay as a mechanism uniquely contributing to the loss of information over the short-
term (Petersons, 1959). Performance in STM tasks, namely memory span and serial recall tasks,
where target material must be recalled according to its presentation order, highlights the importance of
a phonological code in the short-term context (e.g., Conrad, 1964; Conrad & Hull, 1964). The
prevalence of phonological errors in serial recall, and the impairment to recall when lists contain
phonologically similar items reflect a system that is dominated by the processing and retention of
speech sounds (Conrad, 1964; Conrad et al, 1964; Baddeley, 1966). By comparison, LTM processing,
when interrogated using tasks such as free recall, where the requirement for ordered recall is absent
and lists contain greater numbers of items, appears to be dependent upon semantic encoding
(Baddeley, 1966, 1972). Lastly, even under conditions where short-term serial recall is sensitive to the
manipulation of LTM variables, the general absence of order effects supports a two-stage process of
retrieval where short-term traces are selected before any reference to long-term knowledge is made
(e.g., Hulme, et al, 1991; Saint-Aubin & Poirier, 1999, 2000; Walker & Hulme, 1999).
References
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control
processes in Spence K. W. & Spence J. T., The psychology of learning and motivation, 89-195,
Baddeley, A. D. (1966). The influence of acoustic and semantic similarity on long-term memory for
https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746608400047
Baddeley, A. D. (1972). Retrieval rules and semantic coding in short-term memory. Psychological
Baddeley, A. D., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When long-term learning depends on short-term
596X(88)90028-9
Brown, G. B. A., Hulme, C., & Maughan, S. (1991). Memory for familiar and unfamiliar: Evidence
for a long-term memory contribution to short-term memory span. Journal of Memory and
Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British journal of psychology, 55(1),
75-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00899.x
Conrad, R., & Hull, A. J. (1964). Information, acoustic confusion, and memory span. British Journal
Hulme, C., & Walker, I. (1999). Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: Evidence for
7393.25.5.1256
Milner, B. (1968). Disorders of memory after brain lesions in man. Preface: Material-specific and
3932(68)90017-1
Peterson, M. J., & Peterson, L. R. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of
Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (1999). Semantic similarity and immediate serial recall: Is there a
Saint-Aubin, J., & Poirier, M. (2000). Immediate serial of words and nonwords: Tests of the retrieval-
https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212990