Revised QAME Analysis Form 1: ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS

(to be accomplished by Individual Monitors)

Title of the Training Program: Strengthening School Resilience: A School-Based DRRM Contingency Planning Workshop Inclusive Dates: December 13, 2023
Learning Service Provider (Division/HEI): Cagasat High School Class Section: ____________Venue: Cagasat High School
Proponent: Pamela M. Ganio Name of Monitor: Sally J. Florentin, Phd.
Date Monitored: December 13, 2023

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site monitors,
answer the following questions:

1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
SESSION TITLE Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Factors that may Recommended Steps
(This may be done through a Improvement have contributed to to Address the
Focus-Group Discussion)
the areas for Issue/s. (Indicate whether
improvement action can be immediate or
(This may be done through a long-term)
Focus-Group Discussion)
Session 1: Disaster Risk Reduction and The session and Focus-Group discussion To provide adequate Focus-Group Long term action: to
Management and Climate Change objectives were well among school head, support materials discussion among provide sufficient
Terminologies planned facilitators and person/s school head, materials needed in
who has/have expertise facilitators and the lecture and
Average Rating: 3.99 of the topic person/s who has/have workshop.
expertise of the topic

The facilitator To ask stimulating Long term action: to

exhibited full grasp questions and to use use HOTS in asking
Faci/RP: Raffy M. Dumaguina of the topic appropriate training questions to engage
Average Rating: 4.00 aids maximum
participation
Session 2: DRRM Contingency The session and Focus-Group discussion To observe time to Long term action: To
Planning objectives were well among school head, start and time to end use time properly in
Average Rating: 3.99 planned facilitators and person/s properly and to engage the discussion and
who has/have expertise participants in lecture and engage
of the topic activities. maximum
participation.

Faci/RP: Zahjid N. Callang The facilitator To ask stimulating Long term action: to
Average Rating: 4.00 maintained positive questions and to use use HOTS in asking
learning appropriate training questions to engage
environment, aids. maximum
observed appropriate participation
attire and was able
to firm up
attainment of
objectives of the
session

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation

NONE

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Program / Training Management

Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
DAY Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
1 3.988 The session and objectives were well planned and the time Internet Connectivity; Promptness in time
allotment for the topic was adequate
AVERAGE
RATING FOR 3.994
OPERATIONS

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
 Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation
NONE NONE
NONE

IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate action

PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)
Identify Class Section/s and batches Program Attainment of Delivery of Provision of Program Management
Management Objectives Content Support Team Average
Materials
3.99 4.00 3.996 3.97 4.00 3.992
General Average
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING
1. Legal Bases on the importance and Development of Instructional Materials were enumerated and discussed
2. Knowledge on the Parts and format of Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs) were delivered to the participants
3. Acquisition of the technical know-how of developing Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs)
FURTHER LEARNING
1. Will help a lot in developing instructional materials
2. Will Serve as a guide in creating or making Strategic Intervention Materials (SIMs)
3. Integration of SIM and Localization

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

There must be a better internet connection to boost and let the webinar flow smoother and better.
Participants must join the google classroom link 30mins before the start of the program to minimize and address technical problems
All of the participants must always observe punctuality and cooperation
Submitted by: Submitted to / Received by

ZAHJID N. CALLANG PMT Secretariat: MARILOU J. RONCO