Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 3
Chapter 3
This chapter present the design of the study, sources of data, data gathering instrument,
Research Design
programs, processes, and products that must meet internal consistency and effectiveness
(Richey 1994). The product developed may tested the quality characteristic rated by
evaluators who were involved in the development process of the sandblaster sand remover.
To measure the quality characteristic, the study employed a quantitative method using a
5- point likert scale in analyzing the response from the product evaluation scorecard. This
study adopted the 5-point Likert Scale quality scorecard from the study of Aldave (2020),
wherein the researchers enhanced and changed the quality scorecards in term of
Data gathered using a product evaluation scorecard from the five(5) panel of evaluators
mentors with different field specialization; two (3) mechanical and two (2) electrical, to evaluate
the development of the improvised welding machine utilizing recyclable materials which were
Qualitative research has been critized for it’s rigor and strength of validity and realibility
of the data and conclusions. It is important to consider realibilty and validity in creating your
research design (Middleton, 2019) because it increase transparency and decrease opportunities to
insert researcher bias in qualitative research (Singh, 2014). The quality scorecard 5-point Linkert
rating scale used by Aldave (2020) will be modified and enhanced by researchers to rate the
quality characteristics from the specialization of food technology and mechanical technology
description.
The data gathering procedure has three stages which are: (1) innovation of sand blaster
rust remover using recycable materials, (2) evaluation of quality charateristics, and (3)
Stage 2 involved the evaluation of quality characteristic through the use of a product
Stage 3 involved the determination of the degree quality characteristic through the
analysis of the response in the product evaluation scorecard using 5- point Linkert scale.
blaster rust remover , the researcher prepared used air compressor nozzle, scrap bars, metal
Figure 3. Flow Chart for the Innovation and Evaluation of Sand Blaster Rust Rmover
The following are step-by-step procedures in constructing the sand blaster rust remover
machine;
1. Prepare all the metal scrap for the sand blaster safety box, compression hose, and air
compressor nozzle.
2. Weld the metal to construct a small box to make the safety box
3. Flat a screen to segregate the metal chips and sand on the flooring of the box
4. Connect the hose to the compressor nozzle and another hose to the sand jar
5. Connect the hose with compressor nozzle to the air compressor machine
6. Close the door of the safety box with a scrap glass or scrap fiber glass to provide the view
of the workpiece
stage, the product will be rated by the selected five (5) panel of evaluators and the product
was analyzed to validate the panelist’s judgement on the sand blaster rust remover.
Remover. This stage involved the determination of the degree of the quality characteristics
among the evaluators. The degree of quality characteristics is terms of workability, safety,
efficiency, and durability. These was determined through a 5-point Linkert scale. A 5-point
Linkert scale was used determine the degree of quality characteristics as rated by evaluators.
The statistical tool was used to evaluate the results of the innovation of sand blaster rust
remover. Weighted mean was used to process the evaluators scores on various proportions