Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jess/article/view/34578
1
Public Junior High School 7 Pekalongan, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia
2
Social Science Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
3
Historical Education, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Correspondence address: p-ISSN 2252-6390
Seruni No. 59 Poncol, Pekalongan, Jawa Tengah, 51122
e-ISSN 2502-4442
E-mail: karyono70@gmail.com
111
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
112
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
Junior High School 2 Pekalongan brought the will affect the cultural products produced is the
school to an award of integrity with the school. habitus and field theory of Piere Bourdieu.
The model of implementation of character Bandura's theory of social learning and cognitive
education developed through school culture in revolution. analyze whether the title of integrity
Public Junior High School 2 Pekalongan is very achieved by students in Public Junior High
interesting to be an example for other schools. School 2 Pekalongan is the result of interaction
The process of learning plays an important between students and educators through the
role in the process of character development. learning process and the teacher's example.
Since the essence of character building is how the The research location is in Public Junior
students gain knowledge and understanding of High School 2 Pekalongan. The area of the
the values of universal good (moral knowledge) research is essential to help simplify and focus the
that ultimately students have moral awareness issue (Sunarjan, 2014). The selection of research
and belief. Not only do these children have an sites in Public Junior High 2 Pekalongan, because
understanding but the education system also has it is the only school in the city of Pekalongan that
to play an active role in supporting and received the title of the school of integrity with the
reinforcing the values of good so that all children holding of the 2015 national exam.
love these values as the good that should be Data collection techniques used in this
adopted (moral feelings). After developing study are guided by Sugiyono opinion (2013)
understanding and attitude, children will act with namely observation, interviews, and
full awareness of the values of good (moral documentation. Observation, to reveal the
behavior) adopted as expressions of dignity and learning process, and school culture, interviews
self esteem. to find out the policies, and governance of the
Schools with integrity indexes and high implementation of character education, as well as
national exam score achievements can be a model documentation to reveal the learning tools,
of managing a good learning process for other discipline, and records of school achievement.
schools. Schools that received the title of integrity Test the validity of the data using source
have elaborated the learning material with triangulation techniques and methods, namely
character values (Jendela Magazine, Edition comparing, and checking back the degree of trust
II/March 2016). in information that has been obtained through
The purpose of the study is to describe and several sources.
analyze school culture and learning activities in Analysis of research data using qualitative
Public Junior High School 2 Pekalongan in analysis of the interaction model of Miles, and
implementing character education. Huberman. Analysis activities include; data
gathering, data reduction, data presentation, and
METHODS data verification (Miles, and Huberman, 1994).
113
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
Coaching Directorate General of Primary and student coordinator in collaboration with the
Secondary Education Ministry of Education and IMTAQ team (faith and piety).
Culture, Republic of Indonesia Number 2986.1/ The above steps are in line with Lickona
D3/KP/2016 concerning the appointment of (2012) and Berkowitz, and Bier (2005) who state
character education piloting schools, which that character education is a deliberate effort to
implements character education have a more develop good character based on the core
precise direction and program. The character goodness of the objective for the individual and
education implementation program can be society. Character Education is a system of
presented in Table 1. cultivation the value of character to all the school
members including their understanding,
Table 1. Character Education Implementation willingness to act, and actions to implement these
Program values. The character education implementation
Scope Forms of activity program can be presented
Program Determination of the central
character values
Table 1 shows that the program compiled
The formation of the IMTAQ TEAM was a policy aimed at implementing school
Develop a habituation program
Arrangement of school rules
culture as a means of achieving character
Organizing seminars, learning education. They not only made a list of values
training for teachers
Contest related to character
that had to be taught, but they created character
Establish cooperation with other concepts and a commitment to grow.The results
agencies
Evaluating the implementation of
showed that all three program areas could be
character education implemented. The honesty canteen program
Facilities and Management of libraries
infrastructure Honesty canteen
which is directly related to the practice of honesty
Sticking wise words on the walls of can even develop well so that in 2015 received
the school
Classroom with character nuances
assistance from the Ministry of Education and
The sound system is adequate Culture in the amount of Rp 10,000,000.
LCD in each class
Making a school tagline
Preparation of the character education
Making a wall magazine implementation program will be more effective in
Budget Incorporate a character
implementation budget into the
influencing behavior patterns, and the way of
School Revenue and Expenditure thinking of all school members if the application
Budget Plan (RAPBS)
is planned, designed, and evaluated
continuously.
Public Junior High School 2 Pekalongan
The implementation of the character
was designated as a character education piloting
education implementation program through
school in 2016. The follow-up to this program is
school culture is handled by the character-
by allocating budgets, providing supporting
building team coordinated by the student
infrastructure, increasing understanding of
coordinator. The character building team then
character education for teachers, education
determined the character's focus of the five main
personnel. Increased understanding of character
characters, namely: religious, nationalist,
is done through workshops, seminars, and
independent, cooperation, and integrity. The
competitions. Policies and programs are
focus character strengthening in the school year is
implementing character education that fosters a
determined through filling out an application
school culture that is the soul and strength of
questionnaire that has been made with the title
character schools.
Identification of Main Value Strengthening
The school curriculum contains character
Character Education or through ppk.smpn2-
values, spelled out in the character education
pekalongan.sch.id. The questionnaire focused on
implementation program. Implementation of the
strengthening the main characters filled by all
program, handled by the team of character
school residents ranging from the principal,
development. The team is coordinated by the
teachers, education staff, and students. The
114
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
results of determining the main focus of Building School Integrity through Habitual
characters in 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 school Activities
years can be seen in table 2. Honesty and independence character
Table 2 shows in 2016, the focus on development programs are highly considered.
character integrity because it was chosen by 33% Efforts to build integrity among students are
of 717 respondents, while in 2017, the character carried out in various ways, including (1) the
focus of cooperation because 30% of 696 daily tests of the children write "will do the tests
respondents were chosen. The character's focus honestly," (2) the code of conduct states that
will be the spirit in each character stealing at school or outside of school gets 125
implementation activity, but the other aspects are points, and is immediately issued, (3) cheating
still implemented as supporters. The data shows when the test gets the point five, (4) recording the
that the level of implementation of character results of daily tests in BK without bringing the
education was conducted according to Lickona's results of tests, (5) developing an honesty canteen,
(2013) thinking which included moral the BK teacher gives the material repeatedly
understanding, moral feeling and moral action. about "ten tips to reduce cheating."
Socialization of all school residents was The Principle emphasizes the teacher, so
carried out by the school principal as the person that the teacher in the daily assessment, as well as
in charge, while the follow-up and monitoring the semester assessment, is carried out with
were carried out by the character-building team. honesty, responsibility, and transparency. An
Furthermore, to strengthen the school's integrity honest assessment process will obtain national
character, it makes the slogan "Honest Yes Honor exam scores that are equivalent to the average
Achievement." report card grades and school exam scores.
The National Exam Integrity Index (IIUN)
Table 2. Determination Results on the Main illustrates the level of honesty in the
Focus of Characters for 2016/2017 and implementation of the National Examination.
2017/2018 Academic Year Range IIUN 100 to 0. Schools that have an
Year integrity index of 100 have implemented the
Character value (Number of voters/percentage)
2016 (717 ) 2017 (696) National Examination, and there is no cheating
Religious 16 15 at all, the integrity index = 80 means there is
Nationalist 15 11
Mandiri 15 10 cheating when the National Examination = 20%.
Cooperation 21 30 The instrument used to measure the School
Integrity 33 24
Integrity Index (IIS) is consistency data on the
ways and processes of students carrying out the
The management of culture-based
National Examination in the past five years. The
character education strengthening carried out by
National Examination Integrity Index is assessed
Public Junior High School 2 Pekalongan is
in groups, not individually. One group is initially
following the concept and guidelines for
scored per class, then reviewed again per school.
strengthening character education designed by
The IIUN assessment pattern will be seen
the Ministry of Education and Culture. The
through the answers of students in one class,
character strengthening policy at Pekalongan
where students' seats will be considered to
Public Junior High School 2 also reinforces the
measure whether their answers have a pattern or
theory of habitus from Pierre Bourdieu.
not.
According to Ritzer, and Smart (2001) the
The school integrity index is also seen
formation of social attitudes, anything must be
based on the report card grades, and school
structured through a series of domains, or
exams sent to the Principal Educator Data
hierarchically organized arenas. The arena can be
(Dapodik) in the last five years. Examples of
defined as structured space with the rules, and
comparison of the average value of report cards,
their respective functions.
school exams, and national exams in 2017 at
115
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
Table 3. Comparison of the Average Score of Report Cards, School Exams, and National
Examinations in 2017
Average score
Subjects
Report card grades School exams National exam
Indonesian 85.06 85.58 87.93
English 85.84 84.65 86.34
Mathematics 85.84 88.01 81.12
Natural sciences 85.31 89.79 80.96
Table 3 shows that the comparison of the In line with the theory of habitus, and the
average report card grades, school exam scores arena by Pierre Bourdieu at Public Junior High
with national exam scores are equivalent, or even School 2 Pekalongan as an educational
higher. Implementation of character education institution, based on the results of the research
through the culture of school residents is also has become an institution that directs, guides, and
done through routine habituation activities. educates children through various school
Forms of habituation at Public Junior High cultures. School culture through habituation
School 2 Pekalongan include: shake hands with activities aims to make children behave following
the teacher when entering school, marching in the values or norms prevailing in the society.
front of the class before going to class in the first The value comparison data in table 3 also
hour, pray before and after class, literacy, show the schools that take character education
Tadarus Alquran and Bible studies for non- seriously and planned students have high
Muslims, Class picket, Independently recording academic values. The results of this study
the achievements, or writing down the violations reinforce the research of Berkowits & Bier (2005),
committed by the BK teacher, don't cheat each which shows that there is an increase in school
other during tests or exams, The ceremony every motivation in achieving academic achievement in
Monday, and the big day, Dhuha prayers in schools that conduct character education.
congregation, and Dhuha prayers, honesty Although the results of Chang, and Muñoz
canteen, character wall magazine. (2006) research reveal an increasing interest
The findings about school culture carried between character education programs and
out through habituation in Public Junior High academic values.
School 2 Pekalongan helped the formation of
good character in school residents strengthened Implementation of Character Education in the
by previous studies such as Prasetyo, Suyahmo, Learning Process
and Handoyo (2017); Kadir, Salim, and In addition to implementing character
Kamarudin (2012) habituation which was done education through school culture, it is also carried
in line with habitus theory, and Pierre Bourdieu's out through integration into the learning process.
field which states that individual actions can be The process of character recognition is integrated
ascertained not in a vacuum, but concrete social with learning. The process of recognizing
situations governed by a set of objective social character values will build awareness and help
relations. Schools have become arenas or spaces internalize character values effectively.
that produce culture. The culture practiced in The results of research on eight subjects
schools will be effective if all school staff are namely: Social sciences (IPS), Citizenship
supportive, especially teachers because the education (PKn), Indonesian language,
exemplary teacher factor plays a very important Mathematics, Natural sciences (IPA), English,
role. Students will follow a teacher who is a role Physical, sports, and health education (PJOK),
model without having to talk, and the teacher is and Islamic religious education (PIE). Integration
the key to the success of the school program. of character education in subjects is carried out
116
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
through three stages, namely the preparation The teacher implements character
phase of learning, the stage of learning education according to the learning method used.
implementation, and evaluation. The results of the implementation of the character
The preparatory steps taken are: education implementation carried out by eight
(1) analyzing character values, the teacher subject teachers were varied, and not rigid. The
explains Basic Competencies (KD) to identify preliminary, core, closing, and evaluation stages
character values that can be substantially were used to emphasize the characters that had
integrated into the KD. The analysis is intended been designed in RPP. This method shows the
to adjust the character development that is the elaboration of the delivery of learning materials,
focus at school, and adjust what character and the strengthening of character can work well
development is following the learning material, The integration of character education into
and is needed by students. Science, Mathematics the learning process by teachers in Public Junior
and Indonesian Language Teachers, Civics said High School 2 Pekalongan can be seen from
that in addition to analyzing the Basic several steps or learning, namely 1) Teacher
Competencies in determining character values, instills character values in the early stages,
they also looked at learning materials and especially when explaining the purpose of
indicators of competency achievement (GPA) for learning, 2) Teachers implement the learning
later input into the syllabus and Learning process in various ways 3) The learning process is
Implementation Plan (RPP). (2) integrating based on lesson syllabus and planned learning, 4)
character values into the syllabus, by revising the Teacher performs attitude assessment during core
character values contained in the Core learning activities, 5) Teacher exercises learning
Competencies (KI), two or adding component reflection by incorporating character values into
components in a separate column. (3) enter the materials and can be used in everyday life
character values into RPP. The stages of the learning process
The results of research at Public Junior demonstrate the implementation of character
High School 2 Pekalongan, teachers have education in a comprehensive approach. The
designed Learning Implementation Plans, and methods and strategies used vary in character
include the focus of character strengthening as a development. Character built, among others,
foothold of the learning process that integrates honest, critical, creative thinking and effective
characters. communication.
Table 4 shows that the teacher has (RPP) that has been designed has been put into
integrated character values into the learning practice, not merely adding to the focus of
process with different methods according to the strengthening character. The learning process of
learning material. Learning Implementation Plan the six subjects can be described as follows: Social
117
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
118
Karyono, Suyahmo & Cahyo Budi Utomo
Journal of Educational Social Studies 8 (1) (2019) : 111 –119
119