Hamas Invaded Israeli territory and murdered innocent citizens including children and elderly

on 7thOctober 2023.

Citizens were advised to take shelter from the bombing,their iron domes stopped many
rockets but over 250 people were killed and 1500+ were wounded and many have been
taken hostage

France,Germany,India and Italy have condemned these attacks and supported Israel's right
to defend itself.

HAMAS is a militant organisation which controls the Gaza strip from 2006 and is a terrorist
organisation and there is no controversy about it.

HAMAS was started in 1987

Canada,the European Union,Israel,Japan,Australia,the United Kingdom,and the United

States have designated HAMAS as a terrorist organisation.

HAMAS wants to clear Israel completely from the map.

And from the last 30 years, their violent attempts are going on

For general public, data of at least 87 attacks is available

In total,more than 1000 people have been injured or killed due to the attack of HAMAS.

Israel is a small country but all the people from this country live under the threat of terrors.

Hence,Israel has made its Iron Dome defence System

Egypt and Syria attacked Israel on 6 October 1973,they fought over the rights of Israeli
shipping to pass through the Suez Canal and the Red Sea.

Arab countries had supported Soviet Russia in the 1973 war. And to balance this
power,America supported Israel.

While the tragic history of blaming the Jewish people for Jesus’
death begins in the pages of the Gospels, the fact remains that
Jesus was killed by agents of the Roman Empire through a brutal
form of Roman capital punishment. Jesus was indeed one of
thousands of Jews crucified by the Romans.

now who do you think is right Israel or

Palestine I strongly think Palestine have a cause that's their land they
shouldn't be living as refugees in their own land but when they got
freedom from
the British the country was officially
separated into two parts just like how
India and Pakistan were separated it was
Palestine which refused to accept the
partian and waged War on Israel which
resulted in losing all its land Israel
captured those places and a war
Palestine wased on them how can we blame
Israel in this it was Palestine who Wag
the war still Israel gave back the
Palestinian settlements to form their
own country but Hamas completely wants
to destroy Israel they want Israel out
of the map how can we expect Israel to
stay quiet in this matter it has all the
rights to to defend itself let me give
you an example India and Pakistan was
partied in 1947 before that it all used
to be bat for a fact Islam invaded our
land and settled down here just like how
Jews settled in Palestine in 1947 our
land was partitioned into two just like
how Israel and Palestine was partitioned
now Palestine wants to destroy Israel
and reclaim its own land and people are
supporting this now my question is the
same people will they supported if India
wants to destroy Pakistan and reclaim
its ancient land sounds ridiculous right
then why does it sound okay when it
comes to Israel Palestine issue again
I'm saying historically Palestine stands
right that's their land but politically
Israel stands right they abided the UN
partition plan and even won the war
Palestine wased on them about Hamas you
cannot trust a terrorist organization to
run your nation Israel has one of the
strongest armies in the world what do
you expect when you launch attacks on
them they're not going to sit quiet and
there's a huge difference between a war
and a terrorist attack war is fought
with the Army but when you attack the
common people it's called terrorism and
that's what Hamas has been doing for so
long if you want to fight for your cause
fight with the army fight with the
government not with the people and if
anybody thinks what Hamas is doing is
right they are part of the problem
finally I stand with Palestine they need
to have their own country nobody should
be treated as refugees in their own land
but terrorism is not a way to claim what they want

###1 PRO-ISRAEL PERSPECTIVE

OPENING STATEMENT:

○ Israel, the United States, and the United Kingdom share a longstanding
history marked by diplomatic ties and common values. The
relationships among these nations have been shaped by mutual
interests, historical connections, and shared democratic principles.
○ HISTORICAL TIES:
○ Israel's establishment in 1948 was supported by the U.S. and the U.K.,
reflecting a recognition of Israel's right to exist. Over the years,
diplomatic, economic, and cultural ties have strengthened, fostering a
bond that extends beyond geopolitical considerations.
○ SECURITY CONCERNS:
○ Israel faces unique security challenges, including threats from
neighboring regions. The U.S. and the U.K., understanding the
importance of regional stability, have collaborated with Israel on
defense initiatives, reflecting a shared commitment to ensuring the
safety and security of the Israeli people.
○ TERRITORIAL DISPUTES:
○ Israel's perspective on territorial disputes involves complex historical
and geopolitical factors. The nation contends with challenges related
to borders, settlements, and the status of Jerusalem. These issues are
central to discussions on the establishment of a secure and viable
two-state solution.
○ EMPHASISING SECURITY CHALLENGES:
○ Israel, with the support of the U.S. and the U.K., emphasizes the critical
importance of addressing security challenges. These challenges
include the need to safeguard borders, protect against external threats,
and ensure the well-being of its citizens. The collaborative efforts of
these nations reflect a shared commitment to regional stability and
peace.
○

PRO-ISRAEL PERSPECTIVE
○ HISTORICAL TIES:
○ Israel's historical ties to the region are deeply rooted in its biblical and
cultural heritage. The establishment of modern Israel in 1948 was a
response to historical injustices and persecution, particularly the
Holocaust. Jews, with a long historical connection to the land, sought a
homeland to ensure their collective security and self-determination.
○ SECURITY CONCERNS LEADING TO TERRITORIAL ACTIONS:
○ Israel's territorial actions, such as the control of the West Bank and
Golan Heights, are often framed in the context of security concerns.
The Six-Day War in 1967, for example, resulted in Israel gaining control
over these territories. From Israel's perspective, these strategic areas
provide a buffer against potential security threats, allowing for early
detection and defense against potential hostilities.
○ EMPHASISNG ISRAEL’S RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE:
○ Israel consistently emphasizes its inherent right to self-defense. The
nation faces ongoing security challenges, including acts of terrorism
and regional conflicts. Israel's military actions are often positioned as
necessary measures to protect its citizens from external threats. The
construction of security barriers, checkpoints, and military presence in
 certain areas is framed as defensive strategies to ensure the safety
and well-being of the Israeli population.
○ CHALLENGES POSED BY REGIONAL CONFLICTS:
○ The instability in the region, marked by conflicts and geopolitical
tensions, contributes to Israel's security concerns. Threats from
non-state actors, such as Hezbollah and Hamas, as well as the wider
regional dynamics, shape Israel's approach to territorial control and
defense strategies. Israel argues that its actions are responses to a
challenging security environment.

SOLUTIONS

1. Two-State Solution:

Israel reaffirms its commitment to a two-state solution as a foundation for lasting

peace. The establishment of a secure and recognized Palestinian state alongside
Israel is seen as a mutually beneficial outcome that addresses the aspirations of
both Israeli and Palestinian populations.

2. Territorial Adjustments:

Recognizing the sensitivity of territorial disputes, Israel is open to discussions on

territorial adjustments within the framework of a two-state solution. The goal is to
find a fair and equitable distribution of land that respects the security concerns of
both parties.

3. Humanitarian Initiatives:

Israel is willing to engage in initiatives that address humanitarian concerns in the

region. This includes efforts to improve living conditions for Palestinian populations,
enhance access to basic services, and collaborate on economic development
projects that benefit both Israelis and Palestinians.

4. Confidence-Building Measures:

To build trust between the parties, Israel proposes confidence-building measures.

This may include joint security initiatives, cultural exchanges, and educational
programs that foster understanding and cooperation among the Israeli and
Palestinian populations.

5. Regional Involvement:Israel recognizes the importance of regional stability and

invites neighboring countries and international partners to participate in the
negotiation process. A regional approach aims to address broader geopolitical
dynamics and create a more comprehensive framework for sustainable peace.
6. Diplomatic Strategies:

Israel emphasizes the importance of diplomatic strategies that prioritize dialogue

over confrontation. The nation commits to actively engaging in negotiations, seeking
common ground, and employing diplomatic channels to address outstanding issues
and challenges.

Israel:

​ Historical Ties: Israel emphasizes its historical ties to the region, rooted in
biblical and cultural heritage. The establishment of Israel in 1948 was a
response to historical persecution, particularly the Holocaust.
​ Security Concerns: Israel faces unique security challenges, including threats
from neighboring regions. The right to self-defense is a cornerstone of Israel's
perspective, justifying actions taken to safeguard its citizens and borders.
​ Diplomatic Positions: Israel is committed to diplomatic resolutions and has
shown a willingness to engage in peace talks. The nation supports a two-state
solution as a path to lasting peace, recognizing the need for compromises
and dialogue.

United States:

​ Diplomatic and Military Support: The United States has been a longstanding
ally of Israel, providing both diplomatic and military support. This alliance is
based on shared democratic values and strategic interests in the region.

United Kingdom:

​ Historical Context: The United Kingdom acknowledges historical ties with the
region, including the Balfour Declaration of 1917, which expressed support for
the establishment of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine.
​ Diplomatic Perspectives: The UK supports diplomatic efforts to resolve the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict and advocates for a two-state solution, recognizing
the rights and security concerns of both parties.

India:

​ Historical and Diplomatic Ties: India emphasizes its historical and diplomatic
ties with Israel, fostering collaboration in various fields. The nations share
democratic values and a commitment to counter-terrorism efforts.
Pro-Israel Perspective (Israel, India):

Israel:

Esteemed audience, Israel's stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict

centers around addressing humanitarian concerns and territorial

disputes. Our commitment to human rights is demonstrated

through measures to improve living conditions for all residents in

the region, irrespective of their background. Territorial adjustments,

within the framework of a two-state solution, are proposed to create

a fair and sustainable resolution.

India:

India, a long-standing friend of Israel, echoes the importance of

addressing humanitarian concerns and territorial disputes. Our

historical ties with Israel inform our commitment to a just and

comprehensive solution that ensures the well-being and rights of all

parties involved. We advocate for diplomatic initiatives that

promote peace and stability in the region.

Pro-Palestinian Perspective (Palestine, Iran, Syria, Jordan, Pakistan):

Palestine:
Ladies and gentlemen, representing the Pro-Palestinian Perspective,

our narrative emphasizes the urgent need to address humanitarian

concerns and territorial disputes in the Israel-Palestine conflict. The

historical context of displacement and aspirations for recognition

shape our plea for a resolution that prioritizes the rights and dignity

of the Palestinian people.

Iran:

Iran stands in solidarity with Palestine, underscoring the importance

of addressing humanitarian concerns and territorial disputes. Our

diplomatic and political support for Palestine is rooted in the shared

goal of achieving justice, recognizing the rights of Palestinians, and

fostering stability in the region.

Syria, Jordan:

As historical allies of Palestine, Syria and Jordan stress the

imperative of addressing humanitarian concerns and territorial

disputes. Our shared history with Palestine informs our

commitment to advocating for a resolution that ensures the

well-being and rights of the Palestinian people.

Pakistan:Part of the Pro-Palestinian Perspective, Pakistan

emphasizes the urgency of addressing humanitarian concerns and
territorial disputes. Our historical and diplomatic ties with Palestine
drive our commitment to supporting our Palestinian brothers and
sisters in their pursuit of justice, recognition, and a peaceful
resolution to the conflict.