Journal - 4

NAME OF THE CANDIDATE : lalithakumari

NAME;OF THE SPECIALTY : Mtech .
Article ; Comparative study of performance of wicking and conventional railway geotextiles under the synergetic
simulation of train loads and flooding.
Aim:
The aim of study involves:
1. Assessment of Drainage Efficiency:
 Evaluate and compare the drainage efficiency of wicking geotextiles versus conventional geotextiles under
the combined influence of train loads and flooding.
2. Impact of Train Loads:
 Examine how the presence of train loads affects the performance of both wicking and conventional
geotextiles in terms of water drainage and soil stabilization.
3. Comparison of Wicking Action:
 Analyse the wicking action of geotextiles, focusing on how wicking geotextiles facilitate the vertical
movement of water and moisture away from the track structure in comparison to conventional geotextiles.
4. Sustainability Considerations:
 Investigate the environmental and economic sustainability of using wicking geotextiles in railway
applications, considering factors such as maintenance requirements, longevity, and ecological impact.
5. Guidelines for Geotextile Design:
 Develop guidelines for the design and specification of geotextiles in railway applications, especially in regions
prone to flooding, considering the dual challenges of train loads and water management
Objectives:
The objective is to calculate :
1. Assess Soil Stabilization:
 Examine the effectiveness of both types of geotextiles in stabilizing the underlying soil, considering factors
such as soil erosion, settlement, and lateral displacement under the combined loading conditions.
2. Investigate Interaction with Train Loads:
 Analyse how the presence of train loads affects the performance of geotextiles, with a focus on their ability
to maintain drainage and stability during and after train passages
Variables
The variables are :
1. Material Properties:
 Permeability: Measure of the geotextile's ability to allow water to pass through.
 Tensile Strength: Capacity of the geotextile to resist forces applied in tension.
 Pore Size Distribution: Distribution of pore sizes in the geotextile affecting water flow.
2. Hydraulic Conductivity: Ability of the geotextile to conduct water.
3. Soil Properties:
 Soil Type: Type of soil the geotextiles are placed on.
 Soil Moisture Content: Moisture level in the soil.
4. Soil Stiffness: Stiffness of the underlying soil.
5. Performance Indicators:
 Water Infiltration Rate: Rate at which water infiltrates into the subgrade.
 Drainage Efficiency: Efficiency of geotextiles in draining water away from the track.
 Soil Erosion: Degree of erosion in the soil.
 Track Settlement: Amount of settlement experienced by the railway track.
6. Geotextile Displacement: Movement or shifting of the geotextile.
Observations/ findings:
The observed characteristics area:
1. Wicking Action:
 Wicking geotextiles effectively transport water vertically away from the railway structure, contributing to
improved water management.
2. Impact on Track Structure:
 The combined effects of train loads and flooding have varying impacts on the structural integrity of the
railway track, with wicking geotextiles providing better support and stability.
3. Hydrodynamic Forces:
 Wicking geotextiles effectively withstand hydrodynamic forces during flooding events, minimizing the risk of
geotextile displacement.
4. Numerical Model Validation:
  The numerical models used for simulation are validated against real-world data, enhancing confidence in the
accuracy of the simulation results.
5. Guidelines for Design:
 The study contributes to the development or refinement of design guidelines for railway geotextiles,
specifically addressing the challenges posed by the synergetic effects of train loads and flooding
Figures

Conclusion
The study concluded that :
1. Enhanced Drainage Performance:
 The study likely found that wicking geotextiles demonstrate superior drainage performance compared to
conventional geotextiles under the combined influence of train loads and flooding. This inference could be
based on observed water infiltration rates and effective water management.
2. Improved Soil Stabilization:
 Wicking geotextiles may contribute to better soil stabilization, minimizing soil erosion, settlement, and
lateral displacement. The study could have found that these geotextiles effectively mitigate the impacts of
the simulated conditions on the underlying soil.
3. Resilience to Dynamic Loading:
 Inference may suggest that wicking geotextiles maintain their effectiveness in drainage and soil stabilization
even under dynamic loading from trains. This resilience could be attributed to the unique properties of
wicking geotextiles in managing water.
4. Structural Integrity of Railway Track:
 The study might infer that the railway track structure experiences enhanced stability and reduced settlement
when wicking geotextiles are used, particularly in areas prone to flooding and heavy train traffic.
5. Efficient Water Infiltration Management:
 Wicking geotextiles likely excel in managing water infiltration, preventing waterlogging and improving the
overall performance of the railway structure. This inference could be based on measurements of water
infiltration rates and retention characteristics.
6. Hydrodynamic Force Resistance:
 Wicking geotextiles may exhibit better resistance to hydrodynamic forces during flooding events, resulting in
reduced geotextile displacement and improved structural integrity.
7. Durability and Longevity:
 Inference may suggest that wicking geotextiles demonstrate good durability and longevity, showing minimal
signs of degradation or performance decline even after prolonged exposure to cyclic loading from trains and
flooding events.