Professional Documents
Culture Documents
lý thuyết
lý thuyết
SSL - sshdbhdbhdbdnejkdnjdwjhwj
Academic knowledge is shaped by our core mission (sứ mệnh cốt lỗi) through a shared
understanding in many years. Of the ways to advance the discovery and sharing of
knowledge.
- The contingent nature of knowledge (Bản chất tiềm tàng của tri thức)
- The importance of scholarly rigor and the need (Tầm quan trọng của tính nghiêm
minh trong học thuật và nhu cầu)
- The recognition of knowledge, discovery and sharing (Công nhận kiến thức, khám
phá và chia sẻ)
- The recognition of understanding (Sự công nhận của sự hiểu biết)
Academic culture
- The beliefs, core values, and expectations that sharing in an academic community.
+ Independent learning (Học tập độc lập)
+ Critical thinking (Tư duy phản biện)
+ Inquiry (Sự tìm tòi, dò xét)
+ Clarity of expression in communicating those facts (Cách diễn đạt rõ ràng
trong việc truyền đạt những sự việc đó)
+ A responsibility for ethical and positive contribution (Có trách nhiệm với đạo
đức và đóng góp tích cực
- Like an onion
Brick's definition of academic culture as the attitudes, values, and ways of behaving that
are shared by a group of people who work or study in universities.
Information literacy: is your capacity to take that information that you've found, work with
it in a meaningful way -> cái literacy thì nó sd có mục đích, ý nghĩa còn in4 thì bao hàm
chung chung tất cả
Digital literacy: is able to use digital tools to create information, communicate effectively, to
manage your digital identity (nhận dạng) online, and to use digital networks to enhance (nâng
cao) your own learning -> sử dụng công cụ KTS để tạo ra thông tin, quản lí nhận dạng
onl, giao tiếp hiệu quả, nâng cao học hỏi…)
- New language and ultimately we all need to be digital natives (NN mới… người bản
địa KTS)
- Using smartphones and computer, searching the Internet (sd đth thông minh, máy tính
tìm kiếm thông tin)
* literacy: trình độ học vấn, hiểu biết, văn hóa…
Information into academic culture: information is at the core of defending an argument or
making a proposition (bảo vệ lập luận hoặc đưa ra đề xuất) about how the world works,
whether that's in science or the humanities or whatever your field.
Information literacy into academic culture: (văn hóa thông tin thành văn hóa học thuật)
where are you going to find information to support your point of view? How are you going to
assess that information for reliability? How do you evaluate it to make sure it's an accurate
way of defending what you've got to say?
Evaluating information (gồm 5 cái: AATOC) for academic purposes involves taking care to
select information that is reliable.
- Authority test (Where does the information come from?) - Who is the author? Has
the author got expertise in the topic? Is the source of information peer reviewed?
- Audience test (Who is the audience?) – general / professional / academic audience
- Transparency test (Kiểm tra tính minh bạch) (How is the information verified?) -
What evidence is provided? Where does it come from? - Can data collection and data
analysis be checked?
- Objectivity test (Kiểm tra tính khách quan) (Is the source of information objective?) -
What is the purpose of writing? For scholarly purposes? For advertising?
- Currency test (Kiểm tra sự lưu hành, truyền bá) (Is the information up-to-date?)
Five central values of academic integrity: gồm 5 cái (những đức tính quen thuộc)
- Honesty (Trung thực)
- Trust (Lòng tin)
- Fairness (Công bằng)
- Respect (Tôn trọng)
- Responsibility (Trách nhiệm)
Academic misconduct: hành vi sai trái trong học thuật – gồm 5 cái
- Plagiarism (Đạo văn)
- Self-plagiarism (resubmission) (Tự đạo văn = Gửi lại)
- Cheating (Gian lận)
- Fabrication or falsification of data or results (Bịa đặt, làm sai lệch)
- Facilitation of such actions of another student (Tạo đk cho các hành vi trên)
An honour code or student code.
The policy or set of rules that govern student behaviour.
W2: Defining, Assessing & Searching for Information (Xác định, Đánh giá và Tìm kiếm
Thông tin)
- Aesthetics & Style (Thẩm mỹ & Phong cách): bad graphic, confused format,
grammar, site map, index?
- Referencing (Tham khảo): are the sources cited? Link to other reputable sources
Critically Evaluating Wikipedia - 4 cái:
- Audience
- Objectivity
- Accuracy
- Currency
Managing Information: Folders (Folder hierarchies) in the computer, on your USB stick or
on the Cloud through Google Drive or Dropbox.
Step 1:
- Assess credibility and relevance
- Understand main ideas by reading carefully: Abstract, Introduction, Headings/
Subheadings, Conclusion
- Decide read further or put aside
Step 2:
- Gain further understanding
- For relevant sections: Read carefully, examine visual information (graphs, tables, …)
- Skip irrelevant or less relevant sections
Step 3:
- Make detailed notes: organize information, organize your thinking, identify relevant
information
- 4 phase process: ‘Develop categories, Track, Categorize, Organize’ information
Plagiarism is using other people's work, things like other people's ideas, arguments and
opinions, and claiming them as your own without giving proper credit to the people who
thought of and created the information in the first place.
According to Windschuttle and Elliot:
- Plagiarism is a failure to acknowledge that the ideas or information being presented
derive from the work of others.
- It is a serious form of academic misconduct.
- Plagiarism is most commonly identified in written assignments, but may also occur in
exams and presentations. Plagiarism is an important part of academic integrity
Incorporating Sources
- Direct quotes
+ Direct quotes of less than two to three lines: quotation marks.
https://research.wou.edu/apa/apa-direct-quote
+ Longer direct quotes a new line, indented to separate it from your writing.
https://guides.highpoint.edu/c.php?g=19434&p=109626
+ Ellipses, shown as ..., remove some parts of the quote
Intellectual property – Sở hữu trí tuệ: copyright laws, patents and trademarks
Copyright is a moral right and an economic right
- Infringement action
- Accessing and sharing resources
- The creation of works.
- Online reputation
- Online identity
+ Types: Transactional, Social, Professional
+ Characteristics: The Internet remembers everything and the boundaries
between our professional and social lives
+ Relection/debate forums
The purpose of problem solving task at university is to help you both refine your thinking
skills in terms of critical analysis and also to demonstrate your thought process, and the
strategies you have used to tackle (giải quyết) the problems to your lectures.
How do problem solving skills relate to the core values of academic culture?
- Get to know your university
- Self-directed study skills and be self-motivated
- Be confident
- Get out there and try as many things as possible
- Check your email
- Speak to as many students and teachers as possible
Descriptive questions use words such as define, outline, explain, state, summarize or
illustrate, that did not require critique, analyze or evaluate
Descriptive tasks used declarative knowledge. It is just that, questions that ask you to
describe specific information such as facts, figures, or knowledge.
Descriptive problems sometimes known as simple problems, are those that require you to
use facts, figures, or knowledge in a simple way
Analytical tasks are those were you need to do more than simply present information
Analytical tasks might require you to analyze all of the factors that led to a particular result.
Analytical tasks require in-depth exploration and evaluation of a topic often in relevance to
theory.
Analytical problems rely on how well you can determine and analyze the problem, apply a
theory, and justify your solution
- Polya:
- Understand the problem
- Devise a plan
- Carry out the plan
- Look back at what you've done
Understanding Problems
- Define the terms of the problems
- Define what the problem is asking to do
- Identify the “real problem”
Strategies for Understanding and Beginning the Problem
- Using key words (content and function words)
- Assessment Criteria – tiêu chí đánh giá (assessment rubric)
- Using units – sd các đơn vị (originated in maths)
- Visualising – hình dung or drawing a presentation
Using examples
Anomalies – Dị thường
Comparisons
Special cases
There are three steps we need to follow
- Define the existing situation
- Find similar situations with or without the problem
- Identify which factors are different between situations with and without the problem
W4: Taking Creative & Critical Approaches to Solving Problems & Evaluating
Solutions
Collaborative perspectives
Learning from other people
Use deductive reasoning and inductive reasoning
- Deductive reasoning (suy luận diễn dịch), which has also been called top-down
reasoning, premises about general truth lead to specific conclusions. The conclusion
in deductive reasoning will be true as long as the premises are true
-> đi từ trên xuống, từ tiền đề chân lý chung dẫn đến kết luận
+ Example: Premise 1, all university students can read. Premise 2, Angela is a
university student. Conclusion, therefore Angela can read.
- Inductive reasoning (suy luận quy nạp), which proceeds from specific observations
to a more general truth or in the bottom-up direction
-> từ cái cụ thể tới cái tổng quát, từ dưới lên
+ Example: Premise 1, large falls in the value of shares have led to economic
recessions in the past. Premise 2, there was a large fall in the values of shares
last week. Conclusion, there will therefore be an economic recession
Academic culture:
Facione et al., list critical thinking dispositions: khuynh hướng, tính tình
- Inquisitiveness = Curious: Tò mò
- Being systematic: Có hệ thống
- Truth-seeking: Tìm kiếm sự thật
- Self-confidence
- Being analytic: Có tính phân tích
- Open-mindedness
Personal Sphere
• Private
• No fix rules for reasoning
Technical Sphere
Public Sphere
Argument Fields: often correspond with university fields of study such as Law, Literature…
Argument fields share:
- Common purpose (or object) of study
- Shared content of enquiry
- Agreement on what constitutes (cấu thành) knowledge
- A specialised language
- Processes of thought and inquiry
A questioning stance is
- A way of approaching any kind of text
- A general approach to life & owing your own opinions
- Means that we question new information and existing knowledge that relates it
Two categories of questioning:
- Content questions
- Context questions
3. FORMS OF REASONING
- Deductive – diễn dịch
- Inductive – quy nạp
- Abductive (the best explanation for series of events, with the least amount of
assumptions)
4. APPLYING SYSTEM THINKING
- Every system has multiple components, and the connections between each component
form a web.
- To understand complex concepts or issues, we need to analyze the entire web and not
just the individual components.
W4: Argumentation
4. TYPES OF ARGUMENT
- Types of Argument
+ Arguments from analogy – lập luận từ phép loại suy
+ Causal arguments – lập luận nhân quả
+ Argument from generalisation (or reasoning from example) – từ kquat
+ Quasi-logical arguments – LL bán logic
3. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
- Written forms
- Oral forms
- Mike is a first year undergraduate studying Philosophy at university
- His housemate, Jon, is a first year Nutrition student.
- Jon has asked Mike and nine of his other friends to keep a record of what they eat,
and when, for a week.
- However, when Mike is typing up his eating habits for the week, he realises that he
hasn’t eaten any vegetables at all. Not wanting to seem unhealthy, he pretends that he
made a pumpkin soup and adds that to his list.
- Which type of academic misconduct?
+ Six features of a rhetorical situation: The author, The audience, The place, The
purpose, The Social and political influences and The media
- DISCUSSION
+ Consider the following assignment question from an introductory course on
ecology.
+ Analyse the ecological threat of the common European rabbit on Australia’s
diverse ecosystems. What are the benefits of using conventional methods of
control, such as baiting and trapping, over biological controls? Consider both
environmental and economic issues in your response. Outline a plan to deal
with the issue of European rabbits in one of Australia’s national parks.
+ 1. What kind of text is this question asking you to write? Can you tell? Explain
your choice. If you aren’t sure what kind of text it is asking for, explain what
your next step would be if you were given this assignment question.
+ 2. Write a list of “spoken language” questions (who, what, where, why, how)
that you could ask when analysing this question.
- Planning essays
+ Create a working thesis statement
+ The planning process
● Criteria and order
● Discuss how we integrate references
● Evidence into our overall argument
+ The basic structure
● An introduction
● A body
● A conclusion.
- Planning reports & proposals
+ The purpose of professional reports
+ The structure of reports
● Introduction
● The methodology and results sections
● The discussion and conclusion section
1. INTRODUCTION
Introduction to drafting, refining, and incorporating visual aids in written assignments
- Get started
- Flexible plan
- Focus on the ideas, the content, the message
- Plan your time management for submitting an assignment
+ Tables
+ Diagrams
+ Illustrations
+ Bar chart
- Editing for Language
+ Informal language
+ Grammar, long and confusing sentences, irrelevant words or content, overly
complex language, and strong words
+ Each paragraph and sentence individually
W5: Giving Persuasive & Engaging Presentations - Đưa ra những bài thuyết trình
thuyết phục và lôi cuốn