Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.huawei.com
NO.4
Jitter
HOW?
Automatic
Automatic effect
root cause evaluation
analysis
Automatic
optimizatio
n
The following table lists the data sources used by the VoLTE Packet Loss
Optimization feature.
Engineering CM PM MR CHR
Parameter
√ √ √ √ √
Feature description
The feature, VoLTE Packet Loss Optimization, Manually
automatically identifies problematic cells with voice import/export
packet loss, analyzes the root cause, and gives engineering
optimization advice to improve voice packet loss over parameters
MAE-Optimization
the air interface.
The key service flow is as follows:
1. Prepare basic data.
Manually collect and import basic data, including engineering parameters. MAE- Trace
2. Create a region and enable the VoLTE feature. Access Server
Manually create a region, enable the VoLTE feature, and set task parameters. MAE
3. Collect performance counters and MRs. CM
Automatically collect and pre-process performance counters, CM data, MRs, and PM
CHRs required for the task.
MR/CHR
4. Identify problematic cells.
Monitor the voice packet loss rate to automatically identify problematic cells.
5. Analyze the root cause.
6. Generate optimization advice. eNodeB
The optimization advice based on project experience is generated by the
Optimization components. The optimization advice based on online
optimization is generated by the Analytics components.
7. Implement optimization advice.
Remote adjustment is automatically made based on the optimization advice.
8. Evaluate the optimization effect. Perform rollback if negative gains occur.
After optimization advice is implemented, monitor KPIs of problematic cell Architecture of the feature
groups by hour. If any KPIs deteriorate, roll back the related optimization
operations.
Downlink voice packet loss rate = Problematic cells with UL voice packet loss: The UL
N Evaluate optimization advice and determine
whether to roll back the optimization advice,
Man-machine interaction L.Traffic.DL.PktUuLoss.Loss.QCI.1 voice packet loss rate is greater than the
and then evaluate gains.
scenario 3
(1526727934)/L.Traffic.DL.PktUuLoss. optimization threshold for uplink packet loss rate
(VoIP).
Tot.QCI.1 (1526727935) x 100%
N
Problematic cells with DL voice packet loss: The
Turn on the
online optimizing-based parameter DL voice packet loss rate is greater than the
optimization switch. optimization threshold for downlink packet loss
rate (VoIP).
Y
Problematic cells with UL and DL voice: The UL
Generate optimization advice based on online Man-machine interaction
optimizing. scenario 4 voice packet loss rate is greater than optimization
threshold for uplink packet loss rate (VoIP) and
the DL voice packet loss rate is greater than the
Check whether
the aximum number
optimization threshold for downlink packet loss
of execution periods (indicates by N) rate (VoIP).
is
reached.
Parameter Name Value Range & Default Value
Y
Value Range: 0.1–100
Optimization threshold for uplink packet loss rate (VoIP)
End Default Value: 0.7 Unit: %
Optimization threshold for downlink packet loss rate Value Range: 0.1–100
(VoIP) Default Value: 0.5 Unit: %
Downlink Uplink SINR ≤ Uplink SINR poor threshold; Uplink RSRP > Uplink interference RSRP threshold
coverage Weak coverage Proportion of uplink weak coverage MRs > Threshold for uplink weak coverage MR proportion
caused by abnormal
Uplink power control Uplink ROHC decompression failures
interference
Weak coverage L.PDCP.UL.RoHC.FailDecompRatio is greater than uplink ROHC decompression failure rate threshold.
Downlink with available
interference power allowance Uplink resources
Link imbalance If any of the following conditions is met, the uplink resources are limited:
Missing 1: CCE resource usage > CCE high load threshold; Number of concurrent data transmission users > Threshold for the number of concurrent data
neighboring cell transmission users
configuration 2: Uplink PRB usage > Uplink PRB high load threshold; Number of concurrent data transmission users > Threshold for the number of concurrent
data transmission users
No primary serving 3: Uplink CCE allocation failures > Uplink CCE allocation failure times threshold; Number of concurrent data transmission users > Threshold for the
cell number of concurrent data transmission users
4: Proportion of uplink second-level PRB usage higher than 90% > Uplink PRB high load threshold; Number of concurrent data transmission users >
Pilot pollution Threshold for the number of concurrent data transmission users
5: Number of PRBs allocated to PUCCH/Number of total uplink PRBs > PUCCH high load threshold; Number of concurrent data transmission users >
Overshoot coverage Threshold for the number of concurrent data transmission users
5: Number of PRBs allocated to PUSCH/Number of total uplink PRBs > PUSCH high load threshold; Number of concurrent data transmission users >
PCI Mod3 conflicts Threshold for the number of concurrent data transmission users
Multi
UL VoLTE UlVoipSchOptSwitch Freq
Scheduling UlVoipServStateEnhanced ROHC
Sw
UlVoLTEDataSizeEstSwitc
h
ULSCH_PRI_TYPE License&
2. Common scenario: No matter the root cause is interference,
Hardware
PushDtxSchStrategy PDCCH weak coverage, or voluntary, you can adjust parameters,
... InterFreqHOA1ThdRSRP, InterFreqHOA2ThdRSRP, and
DL Cell DLSCH_PRI_TYPE InterFreqHOA4ThdRSRP, to make voice services of
Scheduling problematic cells be handed over to inter-frequency
neighboring cells as soon as possible to optimize the cell
H/M/L load IRC
Preallocation VoLTE PreallocationSwitch voice packet loss rate. (To ensure service performance during
and after the handover, the premise for the adjustment is that
KPIs, such as the VoLTE Packet Loss, Inter-frequency Handover
Success Rate, E-RAB Call Drop Rate, and UL Interference, of
SPS VoLTE PUSCHSpsPcSwitch
the inter-frequency neighboring cells are not worse than the
PDSCHSpsPcSwitch
H interference
thresholds.)
Problematic cell
Edge coverage
Overlap interference
Step 2: For problematic cells where optimization based on project experience sees no obvious effect or rollback is required due to
deterioration, use online optimization based on parameters.
Step 1: Parameter dimension reduction Step 2: Optimization path learning Conditions for parameter
learning Narrow down the searching path based on project experience optimization based on online
Priority optimization parameter learning: Make and feedback on networks to accelerate the optimization speed.
learning
heuristic decisions in selecting priority Project experience: A large adjustment amount of selected
optimization parameters based on adjustment parameters often brings high performance improvement of Dissatisfactory gains: Take a day
directions of different parameters in project problematic cells. However, it also leads to high risks on the as a cycle. After the optimization
experience, and reduce the dimension of overall performance of neighboring cells or the cell cluster. The
100+ combinations
advice is delivered, the uplink and
simultaneous optimization parameters. searching path should be tailored based on feedback on
networks. downlink voice packet loss rate
RS+1 gains are smaller than the
Performance: no good
threshold for online optimization
(PB+1, RS+1) initiation.
Performance:
best Deterioration rollback: Take a
day as a cycle. After the
PB+1 optimization advice is delivered,
Performance:
good rollback has been performed on
cells with packet loss deterioration.
Feature Overview
Basic Principles
Feature Gains and Network Impact
Efficiency improvement
This feature automatically identifies problematic cells
and generates optimization advice. This avoids high
costs brought by repeated DTs in traditional
optimization methods and reduces dependency on
manual experience. Therefore, the MAE can
independently and automatically solve packet loss
problems.