Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
You must be able to analyze the significance of culture, social, political and economic
symbols and practices.
CONTENT/CORE CONTENT
Different Symbols of Culture and Their Practices in the Philippines and Different
Countries
Symbols and Its Importance
Perspective/Approaches in the Study of Culture and Society
Cultural and Social Symbols and Practices.
Symbols are the basis of culture. A symbol is an object, word, or action that
stands for something else with no natural relationship that is culturally defined.
Everything one does throughout their life is based and organized through cultural
symbolism. Symbolism is when something represents abstract ideas or concepts. Some
good examples of symbols/symbolism would be objects, figures, sounds, and colors.
For example in the Hawaiian culture, the performance of a luau is a symbol of their land
and heritage which is performed through song and dance. Also, symbols could be facial
expressions or word interpretations. Symbols mean different things to different people,
which is why it is impossible to hypothesize how a specific culture will symbolize
something. Some symbols are gained from experience, while others are gained from
culture. One of the most common cultural symbols is language. For example, the letters
of an alphabet symbolize the sounds of a specific spoken language.
Symbolism leads to the “Layers of Meaning” concept. Culture is the meaning that
is shared to provide guiding principles for individual meaning.
Language is the most often used form of symbolism. There are 6,912 known living
languages, and the diversity is caused by isolation. Most languages have a different
“symbol” for each letter, word, or phrase. The use of symbols is adaptive, which means
humans can learn to associate new symbols to a concept or new concepts. An example
may be drawn from two populations who speak different languages that come into
contact with one another and need to communicate. They form a language that has a
large degree of flexibility in using either language’s symbols (in this case – patterns of
sound) or a hybrid set of symbols to communicate messages back and forth. This
contact language, or pidgin gradually gives way to a creole with a more formal set of
symbols (words), grammatical rules for their organization, and its own native speakers
who transmit the language from generation to generation.
Symbols represent a wide variety of things. When people see a particular symbol,
they associate it with something meaningful or standard. With this, each country has
their own national symbols to identify themselves from others and to unite its citizens
through nationalism.
According to National Commission for Culture and the Arts (NCCA), official
national symbols of the Philippines represent the country’s traditions and ideals and
convey the principles of Philippine sovereignty and national solidarity.
National Flag
The Philippine national anthem, entitled “Lupang Hinirang,” composed by Julian Felipe,
was first played publicly on June 12, 1898 during the proclamation of Philippine
Independence. Its lyrics were adopted from the Spanish poem, Filipinas, which was
written by José Palma.
Now, you may be wondering: where (or when) in this list will the name Dr. Jose Rizal
appear? What about things like anahaw and mangoes? Sadly, these cannot be included
in the list above as they are listed by the NCCA as national symbols because there is no
law that has been signed declaring them as such.
What follows here is the list of our country’s unofficial national symbols:
Symbols are the basis of culture. A symbol is an object, word, or action that
stands for something else with no natural relationship that is culturally defined.
Everything one does throughout their life is based and organized through cultural
symbolism.
Cultural perspective refers to the way that individuals are shaped by their
environments as well as social and cultural factors. Such factors include a person's
nationality, race, and gender. It is the influence that a culture and society has on a
person's worldview and perspective. This is an important concept in social sciences
because it is important to consider how an individual or group may perceive something
based on the cultural and societal norms that they are used to.
There are so many aspects of culture, and although many are widely accepted, not
all sociologists agree on the way that culture should be studied. Let's examine three of
the most common theoretical approaches used to analyze culture: structural-
functional theory, social conflict theory, and sociobiology.
James Peacock uses another type of analogy to discuss the difference between
the scientific and the humanistic-interpretive approaches in anthropology (1986).
Peacock draws from the field of photography to construct his analogy. He discusses the
“harsh light” of the rigor of scientific analysis which was used to study the biological and
material conditions of a society, versus the “soft focus” which was used when
interpreting the symbols, art, literature, religion, or music of different societies. Peacock
concludes that both the “harsh light” and the “soft focus” are vital ingredients of the
anthropological perspective.
Political culture has been studied most intensively in the context of established
Western democracies. The classic study of political culture is The Civic Culture (1963)
by American political scientists Gabriel Almond and Sydney Verba. Based on surveys
conducted in the United States, Britain, West Germany, Italy, and Mexico, this landmark
investigation sought to identify the political culture within which a liberal democracy is
most likely to develop and consolidate. Almond and Verba’s argument is based on a
distinction between three pure types of political culture:
Parochial political culture where citizens are only indistinctly aware of the
existence of a central government.
Subject political culture where citizens see themselves not as participants in the
political process but as subjects of the government.
Participant political culture where citizens believe both that they can contribute to
the system and that they are affected by it.
Almond and Verba’s work attracted the attention of generations of scholars who
replicated the findings, criticized the conceptualizations, and refined the theory.
Almond and Verba’s core idea was that democracy will prove most stable in
societies where subject and parochial attitudes provide ballast to an essentially
participant culture. This mix is known as civic culture. In this ideal combination, the
citizens are sufficiently active in politics to express their preferences to rulers but not so
involved as to refuse to accept decisions with which they disagree. Thus, the civic
culture resolves the tension within democracy between popular control and effective
governance. In Almond and Verba’s study, Britain and, to a lesser extent, the United
States came closest to this ideal. In both countries, the citizens felt that they could
influence the government. Following the pioneering footsteps of the civic culture,
American political scientist Robert Putnam argued that civic community, based on high
levels of political interest, social equality, interpersonal trust, and voluntary association,
leads to higher probabilities of effective governance and democracy.
Economic Symbols
References:
Study.com/academy/practical
Wikipedia/wik/history
https://www.tandfonline.com
https://www.studocu.com