You are on page 1of 7

lỉrciíctiKnMs

DETERMINATION OF HUMIC
AND FULVIC ACIDS IN FERTILIZERS BY
HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID
CHROMATOGRAPHY - SIZE EXCLUSION
CHROMATOGRAPHY

• NGUYEN HOANG DOM - DANG BAO TRUNG

ABSTRACT:
This study aims to develop a quantitative method of humic and fulvic acids in commercial
fertilizer samples by using the high-performance liquid chromatography size exclusion
chromatography (HPLC-SEC) with the use of UV detector. In comparison with the Walkley-Black
method which uses a redox titration (TCVN 8561:2010), this method eliminates the chemical
interferences caused by the oxidation of the organic impurities (positive eưors in determination of
carbon contents). Furthermore, the size exclusion chromatography technique is able to measure the
molecular weights and their distribution of such the humic substances. In accordance with the
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) and the EURACHEM, the method validation is
assessed via selectivity, method linearity, limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOỌ),
precision (repeatability and reproducibility) and trueness (recovery), and measurement uncertainty.
Keywords: humic acids, fulvic acids, fertilizer, size exclusion chromatography.

1. Introduction HA and FA are chelators, combining with


Humic substances are the major organic minerals to produce organic compounds that can
components of soil, involving humic acids, fulvic be efficiently absorbed via the crop’s roots. In
acids and humins [1]. Humic acids (HA) have addition, they also help the soil retain water and
complex structures, containing ionic groups to restrict the intrusion of toxins toward crops.
form chelate complexes, characterized by the Although HA and FA are not fertilizers, they are
ability to restrain and release metal cations in a excellent fertilizer carriers and activators. It was
plant’s grow environment. Humic acids are evidenced that foliar fertilizers containing such
aqueous-soluble at pH > 2. Meanwhile, fulvic types of acids exhibited to be up to 5 times more
acids (FA) are types of HA with lower molecular efficient in comparison with similar fertilizers. It
weights but higher oxygen contents, which can is important to time-fertilize with the appropriate
absolutely dissolve in water regardless of the pH HA and FA contents, in order to activate growth,
values. Concerning soil fertility and crop yield, flowering and fruit set.

430 SỐ 14 - Tháng 6/2021


HÓA HỌC-CÔNG NGHỆ THựC PHẨM

In agricultural production, the increasing use particular, HPLC-SEC with a uv detector permits
of humic substances is demanding the to estimate analyte’s size and the corresponding
quantification methods of HA and FA in raw distribution, including HA and FA in fertilizer
materials and fertilizers. However, HA and FA do samples. In reality, the HA and FA ingredients of
not have well-defined and consistent chemical raw materials are unknown, and their structures are
structures; therefore, an accurate quantitative not well-defined and consistent; therefore, the
method seems to not exist. Currently, commercial quantification of HA and FA developed by HPLC-
laboratories have offered three methods to SEC is verified via the Walkley-Black method, in
determine the content of HA or their derivatives, accordance with the Association of Official
based on the solubility of HA in dilute alkaline Analytical Chemists (AOAC) and the
solutions and their precipitation after acidification EURACHEM.
[2]: (i) colorimetric method developed by 2. Experimental
Mehlich (1984) [3]; however, FA and other 2.1. Exfraction of HA and FA in raw materials
components (amino acids, proteins, sugars, fatty andfertilizer samples
acids, etc.) dissolved in alkaline cannot be ruled After homogenization and pulverizing (using
out at the characterized wavelength; therefore, 0.2 mm mesh sieve), a mixture of about 5 g raw
HA should be precipitated at pH < 2 and re­ material (or fertilizer samples) and 100 mL
dissolved before colorimetric analysis; (ii) a solution of sodium hydroxide/sodium
semi-quantitative method developed by the pyrophosphate (pH 13) was stirred for 1 hour and
California Department of Food and Agriculture stood overnight. After filtration, the resulting
(CDFA) [4], based on the precipitation of HA at solution was adjusted to pH 7 with 1 N H2SO4
pH < 2 and analyzed by gravimetric method; solution and marked to 200 mL solution with
therefore, the positive error caused by the ash distilled water, to produce the solution A.
content cannot be eliminated; (iii) an improved In 50 mL solution A, HA was precipitated by
method described by Swift (1996) [5], which is adjusting pH to 1 (with 1 N H2SO4) and heating for
f>ased on the precipitation of HA at pH < 2 and 1-2 hours. After filtration, the resulting solution was
heir purification by a couple times washing in marked to 100 mL and then diluted 5 times by
TC1/HF solution. In Vietnam, HA and FA are distilled water (namely solution F, containing FA).
determined based on Vietnamese National The precipitate was dissolved in the phosphate
Standards, involving TCVN 11456:2016 (in soil) buffer solution (pH 6.8) and 0.025 M Na2SO4, the
[6] and TCVN 8561:2010 (in fertilizers) [7], by resulting solution was marked to 100 mL and then
Walkley-Black method applying a redox titration diluted 25 times by distilled water (namely solution
(axidation of organic compounds by K2Cr2O7 in H, containing HA).
I12SO4 medium and then back-titration of the 2.2. Quantification of HA and FA by Walkley-
excess K2Cr2O7 by Fe2+ solution). The principle is Black method
c anstructed on the solubility of both HA and FA in A mixture of 5 mL solution H (or solution F), 5
a Ikaline media, determining the total HA and FA; mL of 0.2 N K2Cr2O7 solution and 20 mL of
and the insolubility of HA in acidic media and concentrated H2SO4 solution was shortly shaken
tl us deduce the only FA content. and then stood for 30 min. Afterward, 50 mL
This study aims to develop a quantitative distilled water and 5 mL of concentrated H3PO4
method of HA and FA in commercial fertilizer solution were added into the solution and cooled at
samples, using high performance liquid room temperature. A drop of ferroin indicator was
chromatography - size exclusion chromatography added and then the excess K2Cr2O7 was back
(I- PLC-SEC). HPLC-SEC is a frequently used titrated with Mohr solution of 0.1 N Fe2+ until the
technique to separate dissolved organic matters, red end point. The blank samples were performed
without pre-extraction of samples; therefore, with the same procedure. The concentrations of HA
adrpting quick response, high sensitivity and or FA converted as carbon contents (mg L1) were
reproducibility, and widespread availability [8], In calculated as the equation 1.

So 14-Tháng 6/2021 431


TẠP CHÍ CÔNG THƯƠNG

C(mgL-‘) = (A-B) 3. Results and Discussion


^K2Cr2O7 x N|<2Cr2O7 (1) 3.1. Sample preparation and determination of
x A HA and FA by HPLC-SEC
3 DF In fertilizer production, commercial ingredients
X—A-X-HT- X 1000
0.75 VH/F of HA and FA are generally unknown, and their
Where: A and B = volumes (mL) of the standard structures are ill-defined and inconsistent.
Mohr solution titrated with the blank sample and Therefore, the standard HA and FA solutions were
the measured solution; VK2Cr2Q7 and NK2Cr2Q7 = performed by extraction of such the humic
volume (mL) and normality (N) of K2Cr2O7 substances in raw materials and then quantitatively
solution; 3 = equivalent weight of carbon; 0.75 = analyzed by Walkley-Black method. In fact, the
75% carbon oxidized by K2Cr2O7; DF = dilution HA and FA samples were absolutely dissolved in
factor; VH/F = volume (mL) of solution H (or highly alkaline solution; in particular
solution F). pyrophosphate can form the complexes with
2.3. Determination of HA and FA by HPLC- calcium ions and other transition metal ions like
SEC iron or copper, eliminating free HA and FA forms
After filtration with PTFE membrane filter and thus their highly solubility in alkaline media
0.45 pm pore size, 20 pL solution H (or solution F) [9], On the other hand, HA could be separated by
was injected into HPLC system (Agilent 1290 their precipitation in an acidic medium (pH 1) and
Infinity II LC), using UV/DAD (1290 Infinity II then their re-dissolving in a high pH solution. The
Diode Array Detector) detected at wavelength of HA and FA concentrations were separately
240 nm, a BioSep-SEC-s2000 column determined by a redox titration method, and then
(Phenomenex BioSep™, 300 X 7.8 mm, 5 pm), calculated following the equation 1. The
with a phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.8, 0.025 M corresponding standard solutions were prepared
Na2SO4) in Milli-Q water as a mobile phase. The with variable carbon concentrations of 0-180 mg L1
flow rate was 0.5 mL min1 and the operating time (for HA) and 0-20 mg L1 (for FA) for the further
was 30 min. calibration.
Construction of calibration curves of HA and In this study, HA and FA were analysed by
FA: the solution H (or the solution F) was diluted HPLC-SEC, using a DAD detector with the
by phosphate buffer solution, with variable carbon wavelength range of 200-400 nm. The absorption
concentrations of 0-180 mg L'1 (for HA) and 0-20 spectra of HA, FA and the blank sample showed
mg L 1 (for FA). The concentrations of HA or FA the maximum absorbances at the range of 230-240
converted as carbon contents (%c, w/w) were nm and no interfering absorption caused by the
calculated as the equation 2. mobile phase with the wavelengths greater than
%c = -Ịễ?^-x VH/p X ———— X 100(2) 240 nm (Figure 1), resulting in the wavelength
lOOOxa H/F m v chosen at 240 nm. The mobile phase containing a
Where: s = HA or FA chromatographic peak phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.8, 0.025 M
areas; a and b = slope and y-intercept of the Na2SO4) in Milli-Q water was optimized with the
straight-line calibration curves; VH/F = volume (L) flow rate of 0.5 mL min1, giving the good
of sample H (or sample F); DF = dilution factor; performance parameters involving the maximum
m = mass of initial sample. intensities, the symmetric peaks in the range of
The number average molecular weight (Mn), 0.5-1.5 (tailing factor: Tf . 0.9 for HA and Tf= 1.5
the weight average molecular weight (Mw) and the for FA), short run time (retention time: RT = 20.9
polydispersity index (PDI) of HA and FA were min for HA and RT = 21.1 min for FA) (Figure 2).
estimated on Agilent GPC Rev B.01.02 data Note that HA and FA were separately analysed
analysis software, based on standard curve of from the solutions H and F due to the restriction of
polyethylene glycol’s molecular weight versus column availability, the resolution factor can be
retention time. ruled out.

432 So 14-Tháng 6/2021


HÓA HỌC' CÔNG NGHỆ THựC PHẨM

In comparison with the redox titration method, Figure 1. Spectra of HA, FA and the blank
HA and FA can be quantitative analysed by HPLC- sample In a phosphate buffer solution (pH 6.8,
SEC, eliminating the chemical interferences 0.025 M Na2SOj) in water as a mobile phase,
caused by the oxidation of the organic impurities at the wavelength scanning of200-400 nm.
(positive errors in determination of carbon
contents). Furthermore, size exclusion
chromatography technique permitted to measure
the molecular weights and their distribution of HA
and FA based on standard curve of polyethylene
glycol’s molecular weight versus retention time
(Figure 3 and Table 1), which affect their mobility
and nutrient regulation in soil [10], Polyethylene
glycol is non-ionic polymer, meanwhile HA and FA
are multi-charged species in neuttal media.
Therefore, their hydrated ions appeared result in a
change of their molecular weight - size relationship
in comparison with polyethylene glycol. In order to Soure: Authors
minimize this effect, the viscosity decreasing and
the ionic strength increasing could be occurred by Figure 2. Chromatographs of the standard HA
adding 0.025 M Na2SO4 in the mobile phase. The (solution H) and FA (solution F) at 240 nm.
polydispersity index of HA (PDI = 2.189) is larger
than that of FA (PDI = 1.454), indicating the
broader molecular weight of HA. In fact, the size
and the molecular weight of HA and FA are
lynamic with regard to concentration, pH, ionic
strength and counter-ions; however, such the
characteristics were obtained with the different
Ỉ suits applying the different methods [10]. In this
-idy, the commercial standard HA and FA
urchased from Aldrich Sigma) showed the
c ifferent molecular weights and their distribution in Soure: Authors

igure 3. Molecular weight distribution of HA (solution H) and FA (solution F)

Molar mass [D]

Soure: Authors

SỐ 14-Tháng 6/2021 433


TẠP CHÌ CÔNG THƯƠNG

comparison with HA and FA isolated from raw (i) Selectivity: the standard HA and FA
materials (solutions H and F). Therefore, solutions and the blank sample were injected into
quantitative analysis of HA and FA by HPLC-SEC chromatography system for 6 replicates. In
should be carried out with the calibration of HA and contrast to the signal absence during 30 min for all
FA isolated from corresponding raw materials. the blank samples, the HA peak (RT = 20.9 min)

Table 1. The number average molecular weight (Mn), the weight average molecular weight (Mw)
and the polydispersity index (PDI) of HA and FA

Entry Parameters HA FA

1 The number average molecular weight (Mn, Da) 1710 1081

2 The weight average molecular weight (Mw, Da) 3743 1572

3 The polydispersity index (PDI = MỰIVỤ 2.189 1.454

Soure: Authors

3.2. Method validation and the FA peak (RT = 21.1 min) were always
The method validation was performed (fit for observed from the corresponding standard
intended use) on the solutions standardized from solutions.
raw materials (172.0 mg/L solution HA, 98.0 mg/L (ii) Method linearity: the standard HA and FA
solution FA and the blank sample), involving (i) solutions (11 solutions for each substance) with
selectivity, (ii) method linearity, (iii) limit of variable carbon concentrations (mg L'1) were
detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ), injected into chromatography system and the
(iv) precision (repeatability and reproducibility) calibration curves were constructed by plotting
and trueness (recovery), and (v) measurement the peak areas of various carbon concentrations.
uncertainty, in accordance with Association of The method was found to be linear in the
Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) and measured ranges with the strong correlation
EURACHEM, summarized in Table 2. coefficients (r2 > 0.99).

Table 2. Validation parameters for HA and FA analysis

Entry Parameters HA FA

1 Linearity range (mg L’1) 8.6-172.0 0.98-19.60

2 Linear equation y = 69.49x- 625.5 y = 36.95x-9.319

3 Correlation coefficient (r2) 0.9990 0.9977

4 Limit of detection, LCD (mg L’1) 1.27 0.49

5 Limit of quantification, LOQ (mg L’1) 4.23 1.63

6 Repeatability, RSDr (%) 4.8 (< 5.3) 5.6 (<7.3)

7 Reproducibility, RSDr (%) 2.4 (< 8) 3.8 (< 11)

8 Recovery (%) 93.3(90-107) 90.7(80-110)

9 Combined standard uncertainty, uc (%) 7.1 10.1

10 Expanded uncertainty, ue (%) 14.2 (< 16) 20.2 (< 22)

Soure: Authors

434 So 14 - Tháng 6/2021


HÓA HỌC-CÔNG NGHỆ THựC PHẨM

(iii) Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of uncertainty (Ue) was estimated at the 95%
quantification (LOQ): the blank samples spiked confidence level and the coverage factor of 2,
with known concentrations of humic substances indicating the acceptable values.
were analysed to reach the signal to noise ratios of 4. Conclusions
S/N - 3 (LOD, 6 replicates) and S/N =10 (LOQ, A reliable method was developed with the aim to
12 replicates). analyze humic and fulvic acids in commercial
(iv) Precision (repeatability and reproducibility) fertilizer samples by high performance liquid
and trueness (recovery): the standard HA and FA chromatography - size exclusion chromatography
solutions were analysed to estimate the relative (HPLC-SEC), using a uv detector with the
standard deviation of repeatability (RSDr, wavelength of 240 nm. Using a phosphate buffer
performed with 6 replicates by the same personnel solution (pH 6.8, 0.025 M Na2SO4) in water as a
at the same times) and the relative standard mobile phase with the flow rate of 0.5 mL min1
deviation of reproducibility (RSDr, performed with offered the good performance parameters involving
10 replicates by different personnel at different the maximum intensities and the symmetric peaks.
times). Recovery test was performed on the spiked In particular, the molecular weight distribution of
samples, showing the values in the acceptable such the acids was also estimated, explaining the
recovery ranges. irrelevant and inconsistent results from various
(v) Measurement uncertainty: characterizing methods. Therefore, an analytical method should be
the dispersion of the values that could reasonably developed and applied to the particular samples of
be attributed to the measured value. Combined such the humic substances. The method validation
standard uncertainty (Uc) was estimated via was well-performed in accordance with AOAC and
reproducibility and recovery; and expanded EURACHEM ■

Acknowledgments:
We acknowledge the support of time and facilities from Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology
(HCMUT), VNU-HCM and Petro Vietnam Camau Fertilizer Joint Stock Companyfor this study.

REFERENCES:

1. R. Pettit. (2008). Organic Matter, Humus, Humate, Humic Acid, Fulvic Acid and Humin: Their Importance in Soil
Fertility and Plant Health. Texas A&M University, 1-24.
2. R. T. Lamar, K. H. Talbot. (2009). Critical Comparison of Humic Acid Test Methods. Communications in Soil
Science and Plant Analysis, 40,2309-2322.
3. A. Mehlich. (1984). Photometric determination of humic matter in soils: A proposed method. Communications in
Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 15,1417-1422.
4. California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDFA). (1999). Humic acid method. Available from CDFA
Fertilizing Materials Inspection Program: 916-445-0444.
5. R. s. Swift. (1996). Organic matter characterization in Methods ofsoil analysis, part 3: Chemical methods (ed. D. L.
Sparks), 1011-1069. Madison, Wise.: Soil Science Society of America.
6. Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam. (2016). Vietnamese National Standards (TCVN 11456:2016).
Soil quality - Determination of humic acid and fulvic acid by Walkley-Black method.
7. Ministry of Science and Technology of Vietnam. (2010). Vietnamese National Standards (TCVN 8561:2010),
Fertilizers - Method for determination of humic acid and fulvic acid.
8. J. J. Alberts, M. Takács, p. K. Egeberg. (2002). Total luminescence specttal characteristics of natural organic
matter (NOM) size fractions as defined by ultrafiltration and high performance size exclusion chromatography
(HPSEC). Organic Geochemistry, 33,817-828.

So 14 - Tháng 6/2021 435


TẠP CHÍ CÔNG THƯ0NG

9. H. Kipton, J. Powell, R. M. Town. (1992). Solubility and fractionation of humic acid, effect of pH and ionic
medium. Analytica Chimica Acta, 267,47-54.
10. M. Klucáková. (2018). Size and Charge Evaluation of Standard Humic and Fulvic Acids as Crucial Factors to
Determine Theứ Envứonmental Behavior and Impact. Frontiers in Chemistry, 6,235.

Received date: May 3,2021


Reviewed date: May 17,2021
Accepted date: June 12,2021

Author’s information:
1. NGUYEN HOANG DOM w
2. PhD. DANG BAO TRUNG **
'Faculty of Chemical Engineering, Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology,
Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City
2PetroVietnam Camau Fertilizer Joint Stock Company

XÂ Y DựNG QUY TRÌNH ĐỊNH LƯỢNG AXIT HUMIC


VÀ AXIT FULVIC TRONG PHÂN BÓN BANG PHƯƠNG PHÁP
SẮC KÝ RÂY PHÂN TỬ HỆU NĂNG CAO

• NGUYỄN HOÀNG ĐỞM'2


• TS. ĐẶNG BẢO TRUNG1*
1 Khoa Kỹ thuật Hóa học, Trường Đại học Bách Khoa,
Đại học Quốc Gia TP. Hồ Chí Minh
2 Công ty cổ phần Phân bón Dầu khí Cà Mau

TÓM TẮT:
Mục đích của nghiên cứu nhằm phát triển một phương pháp định lượng axit humic và axit fulvic
hong cấc mẫu phân bón thương mại bằng kỹ thuật sắc ký rây phân tử hiệu năng cao (HPLC-SEC)
với đầu dò uv. So với phương pháp Walkley-Black - ứng dụng kỹ thuật chuẩn độ oxy hóa - khử
(TCVN 8561:2010), phương pháp này loại trừ các yếu tố nhiễu hóa học gây ra bởi sự oxy hóa các tạp
chất hữu cơ khác (dẫn đến sai số dương ưong việc xác định hàm lượng cacbon tổng). Hơn nữa, kỹ
thuật sắc ký rây phân tử cho phép xác định sự phân bố khối lượng phân tử của các hợp chất humic
này. Theo tiêu chuẩn của Hiệp hội các nhà hóa học phân tích chính thức (AOAC) và EURACHEM,
việc xác nhận giá trị sử dụng của phương pháp được tiến hành bao gồm độ chọn lọc, khoảng tuyến
tính, giới hạn phát hiện (LOD) và giới hạn định lượng (LOQ), độ chụm (độ lặp lại và độ tái lập) và độ
đúng (độ thu hồi), và độ không đảm bảo đo.
Từ khóa: axit humic, axit fulvic, phân bón, sắc ký rây phân tử.

43Ó SỐ 14-Tháng 6/2021

You might also like