You are on page 1of 7

Task 2

1. Developing arguments (FOR):


Choose two from Action and two from Evaluation

Argument Logos Ethics Pathos

A B5: B5:73% millennials spend B5: People think they are


c more on sustainable brands buying sustainable products,
t but they are deceived by
i companies.
o Thoughtful purchasing
n benefits the environment and
reduces waste. Raw materials,
( farming, manufacturing,
N transportation, storage,
U trading and marketing all
R contribute to the
) sustainability of a product or
service. The item's life cycle
and end-of-life disposal have
financial, environmental,
social and ethical impacts.

B3: Earnings from fines can be Consumers can achieve their According to The Trade
used for charitable donations to original purpose of buying Descriptions Ordinance,
environmental organizations greenwashed products, i.e., Chapter 362, Laws of Hong
protecting the environment. Kong (“TDO”), prohibits
false trade descriptions for
goods (section 7) and services
(section 7A). Supplies or
offers to supply any goods to
which a false trade
1
description is applied,
commits an offense

A5: fining prevents companies 73% millennials spend more B5: consumers responsible B5:
from misleading the consumers on sustainable brands
without regards for the
environment A5:TerraChoice defines
A5:shows that many people greenwashing as “the act of
buy products that promotes misleading consumers
sustainability regarding the environmental A5:if you don’t fine the
practices of a company or the companies ,the greenwashing
environmental performance issue will never be resolved
It is the fact that 78% of the and positive communication
companies use greenwashing about environmental
as a method to promote their performance”. If you don’t charge them
product.Therefore if you are with capital ,
buying the product , you are
giving money to the In 1999 the term was added to
companies also harming the the Concise Oxford English
environment Dictionary that defines it as:
“Disinformation disseminated
by an organization so as to
present an environmentally
responsible public image; a
public image of
environmental responsibility
promulgated by or for an
organization, etc., but
perceived as being unfounded
or intentionally misleading”.

Governments responsibility:

2
E B2: Fine companies who use B2: Finding companies for B2: B2:
v greenwashing companies are false environmental claims
consumers react to the
a useful. can serve as a deterrent to
assessment of regulatory
l prevent greenwashing.
bodies and they will chose to
u
stop supporting businesses
a
caught greenwashing, and to
t
pass this information on to
i
other consumers
o
n

(
E
B4: B4: Fining companies for B4: the companies will earn a B4: Okay or not? Good or
F
environmental claims can larger profit from consumers. not?
S
serve as a deterrent to Even though they aren’t
)
prevent greenwashing actually being
environmentally friendly and
harm the environment

Action

B1:It is effective way to tackle the B1: B1: B1:


greenwashing problem
-As companies look for profit -responsibility: if you don’t use this way to
and won’t want to be tackle the problem,you are
the companies need to be
fined,fining companies for shorting the life of people
responsible to their
false environmental claims around you
consumers , make sure their
can serve as a deterrent to
products are
prevent greenwashing.
-The biggest responsibility
3
● Fabric fines 1.3 million belongs to
for mislabelling clothes government.Because the
made of rayon as government
bamboo.

“Access”
-If there is a company fined
by the government,other
companies will take more
attention to their own
decisions.

-Companies care about their


brand reputation and don’t
want the public to know that
their firms do something bad.

-Other method such as


certification is more
challenging to
achieve.Because all the
countries in the world need to
negotiate and standardized
the definition and
measurement of
greenwashing ,and
information that is
communicated to consumers
which is more time-
consuming

4
5
2. Developing arguments (AGAINST):
Choose two from Action and two from Evaluation

Argument Logos Ethics Pathos

A B5:Some Low-development
c countries’ governments may not
t care about the problem of
i greenwashing. They are corrupt
o
n

(
N
U
R
)

E B1:
v
Not feasible it is difficult to count
a
fine
l
u
a
t
i B4: large scale companies.
o they have stopped providing
6
n plastic straw unless the
customers asked for it.
(
E
F don’t care the fine—large
S capital
)

You might also like