Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Manila, Philippines
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
“The rule is settled that a buyer of real property which is in the possession of
persons other than the seller must be wary and should investigate the rights of
those in possession. Otherwise, without such inquiry, the buyer can hardly be
regarded as buyer in good faith.”(Republic vs. De Guzman, et al., G. R. No. 105630,
February 23, 2000, 326 SCRA 267)
The DPWH, as a purchaser, cannot just close its eyes to the possible existence of
defects on the documents submitted by a claimant. It must ensure that the
validation of data and information on the IROW Claims shall give its officials and
staff involved in the IROW acquisition, a high level of confidence to prove beyond
doubt that the claims are legal to the best interest of the government.
PURPOSE
This chapter provides guidance on how to validate and evaluate IROW claims. The
first step is to check the level of confidence of the quantity and quality of data and
information to develop the IROW claims cost estimates. The second step is to
validate the claims against highway rights or decreed properties of public domain.
The third step is to subject the titles to further examination and research. After
having undergone steps 1 to 8, the validator or evaluator or the Technical Working
Group shall have gained the level of confidence to recommend to the IROW
Committees that the claims are legitimate. Likewise, this procedure will ensure
safeguarding the highway rights as the Department will have an accurate
understanding of the extent of its ownership interests, including boundary lines,
existing occupancies and current use.
Shown on the next page is a matrix which can serve as a reference in validating the
quantity and quality of submitted documents supporting IROW claims. Using the
Pass or Fail Criteria, one positive answer to any of those simple questions indicates
that further title examination has to be conducted. To ensure a high level of
confidence in the overall validation and evaluation of IROW claims, it is a must that
the Evaluator(s) proceed to the next steps.
IROW Technical Working Group, Special Order 96, series of 2006
1a
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS AND HIGHWAYS
Manila, Philippines
Note: Only claims that passed the pre-screening with a ranking of high and average level of confidence can proceed to
Step 2. For claims with ranking of below average and poor level of confidence, the Evaluator should notify or
recommend the IROW Committee to disapprove the claim and to return immediately the submitted documents to the
claimant(s) with explanation of the result of the pre-screening.
CRITERIA:
1. Highways rights are decreed properties with highway widths prescribed under a
statute (CA 141, 1936 [Public Land Act], EO47[1936], EO194[1939],
EO294[1940], EO493[1951], Proc. 336[1952], EO113[1955], PD 635[1975],
EO621[1980]
2. Easements pursuant to Water Code of the Philippines
Conditions Actions
Land or parcel of land, subject of the claim
o Passed in one or all the conditions on highway rights and Disapprove Claim
easements (Water Code), i.e., the subject land or parcel of
land is within decreed properties of the government with
prescribed widths under a law or statute
o Failed in all the conditions of highway rights Proceed to Step 4
Old alignment, however, The reservation once taken or availed of by the government cannot be
requires widening extending exercised for the second or third time.
outside the highway rights
Tax Declaration (TD) for Disapprove Claim
Alienable and Disposable
Land (Agricultural land) Tax declarations and tax receipts are only prima facie evidence of
ownership or possession and do not by themselves conclusive proof of
ownership.
Tax Declaration for Non- Disapprove Claim
Alienable and Disposable It is a settled rule that forest lands or forest reserves, timberland,
Land such as Forestland, mineral land, marshland are not capable of private appropriation and
Timberland, Mineral Land, possession thereof, however long cannot convert them into private
Marshland, Land property.
underwater
STEP 7. GET A TITLE OPINION (Optional). The concerned IROW Committee may use
an attorney's title opinion if an attorney with experience in the field of real estate titles is
available to render such an opinion. This may be provided by an attorney of the Department
or of the Office of the Solicitor General.
b) Any information discovered during negotiations or field reviews that may affect the
title to the parcel being acquired must be provided to the concerned District
Engineer/Regional Director/IROW-PMO Director. This information shall be submitted
to the concerned IROW Committee and shall include copies of all pertinent
documents, if available.
If upon verification, the lot described in the technical description does not confirm its physical
existence – Disapprove Claim. Otherwise, proceed to STEP 9.
STEP 9. PREPARE RESOLUTION Passing all the steps and found out that the title is
marketable and free from liens, supporting documents are valid and duly authenticated and
most important the claimant is the refuted owner, then the IROW Committee shall make the
official statement in the form of Resolution. The official statement by the Department that the
parcel(s) described in the resolution is/are necessary for the project and acquisition of the
parcels by eminent domain is authorized. As to the format of the Resolution, which is
appropriate to the situation, refer to Chapter IV of this Guideline.