Professional Documents
Culture Documents
vii
Intentional Teaching of Young Children
Part 1 Foundations of Early Childhood Education This text builds on the framework of developmentally appropriate practice emphasizing
that effective teachers are intentional, thoughtful, and purposeful in everything they do.
should not be viewed in isolation. All three considerations, in fact, interact with and
influence each other; they are always intertwined in shaping children’s development and 118 Part 2 Learning and Developing from Birth to Age 8: Who We Teach
behavior. For example, children all over the world follow a similar developmental pat-
tern when learning language. They all progress from cooing, to babbling, to one-word
utterances, to telegraphic speech (“Daddy up”), to short sentences, and finally to more
complex sentences. However, a wide range of individual variation exists in language Becoming an Intentional Teacher
Intentional teachers know not only what to do with children
acquisition of children who are roughly the same age, because of differences in language
experience as well as developmental variation. At age 3, Joey speaks in three-word ut-
Teaching in the “Zone”
but also why they are doing it and can explain the rationale
Here’s What Happened In my kindergarten, we are to solve the problem, ex-
terances, whereas his same-age cousin, Michael, expounds in paragraphs. Finally, each working on the basic mathematical number operations— plaining each of their steps.
child speaks the language, including the dialect, of his or her own cultural group. Six- adding and subtracting. In our classroom, children work in
theyconversations
select the strategies they do,andand skills challenge students to
to support his understanding and application of subtraction: children learn best in the context of supportive relation-
with children, observes their behavior throughout the day, ships, and I structure interactions in my classroom to in-
1) I set aside 5–10 minutes twice a week to work individ-
and sets up specific tasks to evaluate their skills such as literacy tasks or solving math tentionally support each learner. I do this by: (1) assessing
reflect further
problems on these scenarios.
with counters.
ually with Miguel. Using manipulatives, including an
abacus and small counting trains. Miguel loves trains!
each child’s level of independent performance on a skill,
(2) assessing each child’s level of supported (with help)
As she gets to know her students, she regularly assesses their abilities and in- During this time, I verbally support Miguel’s grouping
performance on a skill, and (3) developing lessons that al-
and counting, using short word problems and number
terests in relation to what she knows from her study of child development, the cur- cards.
low a child to practice in their supported level, until the
child can do the skill independently. I then set the next
riculum goals, and her experiences teaching other 6- and 7-year-olds. She finds that 2) I also intentionally join Miguel and other children in
higher level of skill as the child’s goal skill.
the Home Improvement Store at center time. I intro-
a few children exceed her expectations in reading or social skills, whereas others are duce the concept of “Supply Lists” to the center, using Vygotsky used the term zone of proximal development
significantly behind their peers in some areas. Each child has a unique personality cards with pictures and labels of the different supplies. (ZPD) to describe the child’s skill level when supported by
and profile of abilities, and Frida becomes more aware of these. Children can add nuts, bolts, and tools to their baskets, an adult or more experienced peer. He believed that by as-
according to the list, and return (subtract) things they sessing only what a child knows, a teacher does not have
Neela has Down syndrome, and Frida has already met with her parents and the no longer need for their building projects. As Miguel information on how to support the child’s progress. But by
team of special education professionals who create and implement an individualized purchases and returns items for his building project, I assessing a child’s ZPD, I am able to structure for progres-
support and make explicit his adding and subtracting, sive development and learning.
educational plan for her. After a few weeks, Frida becomes concerned that another pointing out to Miguel how successfully he uses math
child, Almonzo, might have an undiagnosed language delay. In the case of the six for his project. Reflection How did this teacher use assessment to
3) Finally, during the morning math challenge, I pair guide her intentional teaching? What other strategies could
children whose home languages are not ones Frida knows, she recognizes that she Miguel with a friend who understands subtraction con- she have used to teach Miguel in his Zone of Proximal
must take extra steps to find out about them. Using community volunteers and, in cepts well, and is very verbal. I have them work together Development?
one case, a paid translator, Frida connects with the families of her students to build
relationships and to learn what capabilities the children exhibit in their homes and
communities.
gets over the last hurdle herself. Ave gives him a big smile as she pushes off with her feet
So we see that in meeting the children, Frida seamlessly draws on her knowledge zone of proximal development
and makes a circle around the room.
(ZPD) The distance between
of child development and learning, as well as her knowledge of them as individuals and the actual developmental level By giving Ave “a leg up,” Khari helped her accomplish a goal that she couldn’t do on
members of cultural groups. Precisely because children are so different and their abilities an individual has achieved (her her own, but could achieve with his assistance. Vygotsky (1978) identified this as the
independent level of problem zone of proximal development (ZPD)—the distance between the actual developmental
vary so greatly, Frida will need to draw from a wide repertoire of teaching strategies to solving) and the level of po- level an individual has achieved (their independent level of problem solving) and the
help them achieve developmentally appropriate goals. tential development she could level of potential development they could achieve with adult guidance or through
achieve with adult guidance
So far we have described the areas of knowledge that teachers consider in making or through collaboration with
collaboration with other children. The assistance, guidance, and direction teachers pro-
decisions about developmentally appropriate practice—what teachers need to know and other children.
vide children in their ZPD is called scaffolding. To gain deeper understanding of how
children learn in their ZPD, read the feature Becoming an Intentional Teacher: Teaching
think about. Now we turn to the work of the teachers—what do early childhood teachers scaffolding The assistance,
in the “Zone.”
do? What are the dimensions of practice that describe the teacher’s role? guidance, and direction teach-
ers provide children to help
Social Construction of Knowledge Scaffolding does not mean that teachers
✓ Check Your Understanding 3.3: Developmentally Appropriate Decision Making them accomplish a task or
learn a skill (within their ZPD)
that they could not achieve on
control or shape learning, as behaviorists believe (see p. 124). Instead, children learn by
solving problems collaboratively with the teacher’s support or by working with peers,
their own. which is called co-construction, or social construction of knowledge.
Effective teachers are informed decision makers who adapt
The Complex Role of the Teacher
According to the NAEYC’s (2009) guidelines for developmentally appropriate practice,
for individual differences, including for children with dis-
the complex job of an early childhood teacher has five interrelated dimensions: (1)
creating a caring community of learners, (2) teaching to enhance learning and devel-
abilities and special needs. Check Your Understanding
opment, (3) planning curriculum to achieve important goals, (4) assessing children’s features engage students in assessing their own learning.
learning and development, and (5) establishing reciprocal relationships with families.
Some questions involve critical thinking about a complex
teaching situation or issue confronting the early childhood
Chapter 3 Understanding and Applying Developmentally Appropriate Practice 99
field. TheseKey
quizzes
Terms appear only in REVELTM and include
feedback.
_C03.indd 84 10/8/15 11:56 AM ■ age appropriate ■ culture ■ intentional teachers ■ push-down curriculum
■ assessment ■ curriculum ■ learning centers ■ reciprocal relationships
■ caring community of ■ developmentally appro- ■ position statement ■ scientifically based
learners priate practice (DAP) curriculum
■ culturally appropriate ■ individually appropriate
Intentional teachers must reflect and apply their knowl- Readings and Websites
edge using a broad repertoire of effective teaching strat- Carter, M., & Curtis, D. (2014). Designs for living and National Association for the Education of Young
learning: Transforming early childhood environments. Children
egies. Demonstrate Your Learning features at the end St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press.
Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (Eds.). (2009). Devel-
NAEYC’s website has a special section on resources for
developmentally appropriate practice and play, plus cop-
of each chapter require students to practice these skills. opmentally appropriate practice in early childhood
programs serving children from birth through age 8
ies of all their position statements.
ZERO to THREE—National Center for Infants,
This end-of-chapter quiz appears only in REVELTM and (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the
Education of Young Children.
Toddlers, and Families
This website provides resources and practical tips for
includes feedback.
Epstein, A. S. (2014). The intentional teacher: Choosing working with infants, toddlers, and their families.
the best strategies for young children’s learning (Rev.
ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Edu-
cation of Young Children.
ASCD Whole Child Initiative
This website provides resources promoting elementary
education that supports all areas of children’s develop-
ment and learning.
viii
Current Research on Effective Practices
In an era of Common Core State Standards and Early Learning standards, accountability,
and rapid change in the field, the text makes research understandable and meaningful for
students and illustrates the connections between child development, curriculum content,
assessment, and intentional teaching.
Chapter 13 Teaching Children to Investigate and Solve Problems 449
What Works
Teaching STEM to Dual Language Learners
Considerable attention is paid to research on how dual language
learners acquire English and learn to read. At times, there is an as-
graders used to interpret their graphs in
Figure 13.1.
What Works features present research-based practices in
action, including descriptions of demonstrated effective
sumption that because mathematics is about numbers and quan- Problem solving is playing a larger role in
tity, language is less of a barrier. However, mathematics itself is today’s curriculum due to the Common Core standards, but word
a language, and as we have seen, math talk is what makes its ab- problems complicate the challenge of math instruction for dual
move toward “both/and” thinking. Isaac brings the teacher the song card and then hood program. As is clearburgeoning from Isaac’s friendships.
case and by The class uses Skype to com-
Yao ofisthea Chinese speaker who doesn’t talk at all in
points to the picture water table. His teacher contrast Tara’s experience,municate with children’s
developmentally appropri-relatives in other parts of the
Culture Lens models, “I want preschool.
“Water table.” His
to play at the.
won’t
He is. .isolated
playproud
teacher, with of
.” Isaacfrom
him.his His
says,the ate
other
teacher knows
increasing
children
practice
successful
who the necessary
provides
thatinclusion
country orfoundation
without in theincluding
world. Within
program.native
for hisa few weeks, all the children,
But individually
English speakers, enjoy helping each
Understanding and Responding to Code verbal skills, givessocial
Switching him ainteraction,
hug and says, his “Off
English
you skills won’t develop.
go appropriate She are
adaptations also explore
other essential for children
different languages and learn together.
to the water table.” loansWhenhisIsaac’s
familymother
an iPad andhim
picks with the
withhelp of a trans-
disabilities and other special needs.
lator shows him a digital storytelling app to create a Children all over the world speak multiple languages. The
Code switching is the ability to understand and use both using the same strategies that promote language learning
story about his family with photos and narration in both opportunity to become bilingual or multilingual awaits
the commonly accepted version of English and the home in all children: listening and responding in a meaningful
language or dialect. When children are learning a second English
way, using real objects and nonverbal cues, Chinese. When he shares the story with the every child in America if schools take advantage of young
andintentionally
language, they often code switch, usually beginning a teaching new words, and extendingother conversations
children, they
withrealize that Yao has an interesting children’s inborn ability to learn language and the afford-
sentence in one language and then switching to the other quietly with
questions life andAseveral
a puzzle or pegboard.
and ideas. secondofgrader
them decide
loves totoread
use and
the spends all of herable,
app to create free technological resources now available.
as in: “I drew a picture de mi madre” or “Mi mano es stories about
time with abilingual
Sometimes book, while
teachersanother
think that they themselves.
struggles with
can reading but looks forward to math because
sup- Sources: Digital Story Helps Dual Language Learner Connect
dirty.” Code switching is not limited to children. In fact,
bilingual people of all ages alternate between languages
it’s her
port dualbest subject.
language learning by alternating languages
Kara’s kindergarten includes speakers of four different
with Classmates, by D. Bates, no date, Washington, DC: National
themselves.
The term Again, the opposite appropriate
individually is true. Children’s brains
refers to teachers aboutAssociation for the Education of Young Children, retrieved August
depending on the setting and the topic of conversation.
will automatically listen and respond home languages, some
to the language of whomusing whatarrived
are newly they know
immi- the individually
27, 2014,
appropriate
from http://www.naeyc.org/technology/digital-story-
Many bilingual individuals find that they can best ex- personality, strengths, interests,
grants. and abilities
She
they know best and tune out the other one. To promote relies of
on each individual
technology to child
create in
an the group
accessible to adapt Information about the strengths,
press their feelings and personal thoughts in their native helps-dual-language-learner;
interests, abilities, and“Using
needs Technology as a Teaching
for and
dual be responsive
language development, to bilingual
individual
environment variation.
teachers forcan Consider,
allread
the childrenfor instance,
as they two
acquire tricycle riders:
sufficient Tool for Dual Language Learners
language. of each individual child inin
thePreschool through Grade 3,”
The fearless
books in each rider maybut
language need more
should
English careful
do to
sonavigatesupervision
at separatethe school.to prevent injury,
Kara posts whileand
pictures the warier
by K. N. group
Nemeth
In the past, it was assumed that code switching meant times. that enables teachers2013,
and F. S. Simon, to Young Children, 68(1),
child may need extra encouragement and support
labels in various to develop
languages (in somehiscases
large motor skills. Similar-
with phonetic 48–52. adapt to and be responsive to
that children were confused or incompetent. But now we
know that the opposite is true: children are able to sepa-
ly, some children
Encouraging childrenwilltoneed
code enriched
switch and experiences
respondingto accelerate their language development, individual variation.
positively
while a few honorsmay theneed
language system support
individual that they toalready
continue to build on their precocious reading
rate the languages in their brains and apply the differ-
possess and helps them adapt to different communica-
ent rules of grammar of each language. Code switching ability. A withdrawn, timid child may need a great deal of emotional support to cope with
tion requirements in different situations. And it also
is actually a sign of children’s growing communicative life’s challenges, while another needs helpbecause
controlling aggression to make friends.
respects and supports their cultural identity
competence. They are using all they know to communi-
Withand
language the culture
individual differenceslinked.
are inextricably that exist,
Teach-teachers clearly cannot expect all children
cate as clearly as they can.
in ashould
ers groupalways
to learn theasame
create warm,thing
positivein classroom
the same way at the same time. Even when the
So what should teachers do about code switching? First, climate in which children feel safe
teacher introduces a concept or reads a book to express them-
to a whole group, each child will take away
they should expect code switching as a normal aspect selves. Capable code switchers acquire the ability to
of dual language learning. The most important thing is something
think about different
their own fromuse ofthe learning
language, experience.
which serves Therefore, to help children progress,
not to correct children when they mix languages. Cor- them well in other learning situations and has long-
recting children’s language attempts sends a signal that lasting positive effects on language, cognition, and so-
they’ve done something wrong. They may stop trying to cial development.
communicate in order to avoid making the “mistake” of
code switching. Source: Code Switching: Why It Matters and How to Respond, by
National Center on Cultural and Linguistic Responsiveness, no
Instead of focusing on children’s “errors,” teachers date, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human
should focus on understanding the child’s message. They Services, Office of Head Start. Retrieved January 26, 2015, from
should view code switching as a strength. As always, http://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/hslc/tta-system/cultural-linguistic
teachers should be good language models themselves, /fcp/docs/code-switching.pdf.
• Current research findings, such as effective strategies for teaching dual language learn-
ers or children with autism spectrum disorder, are brought to life and made meaningful
by connections to classroom and community examples.
• The terms and definitions used in this text contribute to establishing a shared v ocabulary
for all of those in and entering the field.
• Approximately 40% of the references are from 2012 and beyond.
ix
Connections between Curriculum and
Child Development
Unlike many early childhood texts that focus on child development only, this text shows
how child development and curriculum content knowledge are connected.
Chapter 12 Teaching Children to Communicate: Language, Literacy, and the Arts 383
Developmental Continuum
Oral Language
Age of Child Developmental Expectations
In the Developmental Continuum feature, the text provides Birth to about
8 months
• Communicate through behaviors rather than words; signal distress by crying. Caregivers
need to interpret babies’ sounds and gestures.
• Chapters 12 to 15 help early childhood teachers understand right from the start
that there is content in the curriculum for young children. They describe the goals
for young children’s learning and development that predict success in school and
life. Each of these chapters includes examples of effective strategies such as teach-
ing children of diverse abilities in inclusive classrooms or ways to promote dual
language learning.
Chapter 1 Continuity and Change in Early Childhood Education 31
Promoting Play
Addressing Threats to Children’s Play
A new feature, Promoting Play, presents new research on the
Pediatricians and psychologists agree that too many
children today experience high levels of unrelent-
important role of play in development and effective strategies
In an attempt to get children ready for school and
protect them from injury, early childhood programs
ing stress. Factors such as poverty and violence are
the primary sources, but stress affects the lives of
all children to some extent. Teachers today report
to help children learn through play or protect their right to play.
may actually be contributing to children’s stress by
minimizing children’s large muscle activity and child-
initiated play time. Because children spend so much
that more children are aggressive and disruptive as
a result of stressful events. Increasing numbers of
These features address play across the full age range, from birth
time in early childhood programs and school, it may
be their only opportunity to have physical activity or
Continuity and Change deems it unimportant. Therefore, you will find a discussion of
One overarching trend always affecting education is continuity and change. As the field
expands and changes occur in response to new political and economic realities, many
longtime early childhood professionals are concerned that the fundamental values of the
play in every chapter of this book.
• The emphasis on implementing effective curriculum reflects current trends such
field will be lost. Development, including development of professions, is characterized by
both continuity and change. In this book we describe how the fundamental values of early
childhood education can be retained and enhanced (thus maintaining continuity with the
important tenets of the past), while also presenting what is known from new research
as the goal of aligning prekindergarten and primary education, NAEYC accredita-
about effective teaching practices for all children. Some ways of thinking and practicing
should be cherished and held onto, whereas others may need to be updated or abandoned.
tion and CAPE professional preparation standards, and enhanced expectations for
teacher qualifications as described in the 2015 report, Transforming the Workforce
for Children Birth through Age 9: A Unifying Foundation by the Institute of Medicine
and the National Research Council.
x
Acknowledgments
Over more than four decades in early childhood education, I have had the
privilege of working with and learning from countless friends, colleagues, teachers, and
children. This book would not have been possible without the help and encouragement of
the following people:
My deepest appreciation goes to Kathleen Cranley Gallagher, my collaborator on this
edition, who revised Chapters 4, 5, 7, 8, 11, 14, and 15. Kate’s vast experience with chil-
dren, with and without disabilities, as well as her research on children’s social-emotional
development and mental health greatly inform this edition. Kate contributed research and
effective practices on early intervention, teaching children with autism spectrum disorder,
and other cutting-edge topics. Without Kate’s help, I can’t imagine completing this work
in a timely fashion.
I especially wish to thank Carol Copple, with whom I have collaborated on Devel-
opmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs for several decades, and
who contributed features as well as invaluable assistance in conceptualizing aspects of the
book. Thanks also to Laura Colker for her overwhelming generosity, sharing of ideas, and
gracious support.
I want to acknowledge Carol Brunson Day for teaching me so much about diver-
sity, anti-bias education, and cultural influences on development. Her work contributed
greatly to the Culture and Language Lens features and Chapter 6.
Thank you to Gail E. Joseph, who was especially helpful on the first edition, and many
of her contributions are still present in Chapters 5 and 14 and the Including All Children
lenses.
Thanks to my longtime friend Kay M. Albrecht, who contributed to Chapter 15 and
provided numerous examples from her extensive classroom experience.
I wish to thank Linda Espinosa and Luis Hernandez for helping ensure that the book
reflects the most current research and practical examples for teaching dual language
learners.
Close colleagues whose wisdom and encouragement have educated and sustained me
for decades include Marilyn Smith, J. D. Andrews, Barbara Willer, and Barbara Bowman.
My deepest gratitude goes to Sharon Lynn Kagan for writing the foreword to this edi-
tion. The debt is never paid to the late Carol Seefeldt, who taught the first early childhood
course I ever took and mentored me through my dissertation. I hope that my work con-
tinues to reflect her vision.
A sincere thank you and acknowledgment of support to Arlington Public Schools
(APS) in Arlington, Virginia. Those assisting in the effort include: Arlington Public
Schools administrative personnel Regina Van Horne, Lisa Stengle, and Linda Erdos;
K. W. Barrett Elementary principal, Mr. Dan Redding; and K. W. Barrett instructional
staff Joshua McLaughlin, Anastasia Erickson, Emily Sonenshine, Stephanie Shaefer, Judy
Concha, Jennifer Flores, Elizabeth Jurkevics, and Richard Russey. Also, a big thanks to
those students and their parents who allowed us to use the student artwork and artifacts
found in this book.
I am also grateful to the many other schools, teachers, and administrators who
welcomed me as an observer, shared examples, and contributed artifacts, including:
Cathy Polanski, Second Grade, Arcola Elementary School; Hoaliku Drake Preschool,
Kamehameha Schools Community-Based Early Childhood Education; the Center
for Young Children at the University of Maryland; The Shoenbaum Family Center in
Columbus, Ohio, including Anneliese Johnson; Wickliffe Progressive Community School
and the Jentgen family; Linden, New Jersey, Public Schools; Far Hills Country Day School
in Far Hills, New Jersey; the HighScope Demonstration Preschool in Ypsilanti, Michigan;
and Easter Seals Blake Children’s Achievement Center in Tucson, Arizona.
I continue to be indebted to Julie Peters, my editor at Pearson, for contributing her
wealth of knowledge about early childhood teacher education, and her unwavering s upport
for my work. I also wish to thank Linda Bishop for leading me through the d evelopment
xi
of an Interactive eText for the first time. Thanks also for the creative contributions to the
first edition of Max Effenson Chuck and Kelly Villella Canton.
My life and work continue to be inspired by Patty Smith Hill, founder of NANE,
whose vision for early childhood education laid the foundation for NAEYC’s commitment
to developmentally appropriate practice.
I would also like to thank the many reviewers who contributed to the development
of this book. They are: Margaret Charlton, Tidewater Community College; Jody Eberly,
The College of New Jersey; Amy Howell, Central Oregon Community College; Claire
Lenz, St. Joseph’s College; Marilyn Roseman, Mount Aloysius College; and Lois Silvernail,
Spring Hill College.
Instructor Supplements
The following instructor tools supplement, support, and reinforce the content presented
throughout the text. All supplements are available for download for instructors who adopt
this text. Go to http://www.pearsonhighered.com, click “Educators,” register for access,
and download files. For more information, contact your Pearson representative.
• Online Instructor’s Manual (013402687X). The Instructor’s Resource Manual pro-
vides chapter-by-chapter tools to use in class. Lecture or discussion outlines, teach-
ing strategies, in-class activities, student projects, key term definitions, and helpful
resources will reinforce key concepts and applications and keep students engaged.
• Online Test Bank (0134026756). These multiple-choice and essay questions tied to
each chapter provide instructors the opportunity to assess student understanding
of the chapter content. An answer key is provided.
• Online PowerPointTM Slides (0134026829). Each slide reinforces key concepts and
big ideas presented throughout the text.
• TestGen (013402673X). This powerful test generator contains the same items that
are in the Online Test Bank, but you may add or revise items. Assessments may be
created for print or testing online. You install TestGen on your personal computer
(Windows or Macintosh) and create your own tests for classroom testing and for
other specialized delivery options, such as over a local area network or on the web.
xii
Foreword
Like all Sue Bredekamp’s work, Effective Practices in Early Childhood Education:
Building a Foundation has become a landmark. Since its publication, it has been
the major benchmark against which all volumes related to early childhood practice are
measured, domestically and internationally. Indeed, it has been a driving force, not only
guiding practice and scholarship, but also serving as a seminal vehicle to codify and
chronicle the impact of history, the experiences of practitioners and leaders, and the im-
pact of policy on the changing field of early education. In so doing, it has converted static
assumptions and understandings about early childhood pedagogy into living, dynamic,
and far more intentional practices.
Since its appearance, Effective Practices has been widely read and used to guide early
childhood teacher preparation and practice. Its popularity has placed a special burden on
the work; it, like the field, cannot remain stagnant or isolated from changes in the social
context. Precisely because it is so well used and because the field is changing so rapidly, a
new edition is necessary. Consider for example, the impact that the emergence of the K–12
Common Core has had on early education: whether one favors or disparages the Common
Core ideologically, it is here to stay and is having profound impacts on American educa-
tion generally, and American early education specifically. In addition, the revitalization
of an emphasis on continuity and transition, emerging currently in the form of the “P–3
Movement,” is altering the way early educators conceptualize and actualize the linkages
between pre-primary and primary education. Within the birth to 5-year-old component
of early childhood, a renewed emphasis on supporting the infrastructure through the Ear-
ly Learning Challenge Fund, with its focus on Quality Rating and Improvement Systems,
standards, and assessments, is precipitating dramatic changes in the way early childhood
education services are being designed and delivered. Finally, new research related to the
way children learn and process information is calling forth compelling pedagogical align-
ments that address the importance of dual language learners, executive functioning, early
mathematics, and learning progressions.
With the early childhood field changing so rapidly, time-honored questions are be-
ing catapulted to new prominence, often begging for urgent response: What should be
the balance between cognitive development and other domains historically important to
early childhood? What should be the balance between a focus on learning processes and
content? What should be the balance between teacher-guided, intentional pedagogy and
child-guided experiential learning? Note that none of these questions is new and that each
recognizes the critical importance of balance.
Indeed, the majesty of this volume is that it, too, understands and addresses the im-
portance of the contemporary context and the balance in perspective and practice it de-
mands. In this volume, Bredekamp takes a long-haul view; she renders solid definitions
of the field, situating the reader firmly in reality, and provides one of the most thorough
historical overviews available. But Bredekamp does not stop there, nor does she skirt the
tough issues, the new research, or the new demands being placed on early educators.
Rather, with clarity and grace, she systematically addresses them all, setting before the
field a rich compendium of research, firsthand and extremely well-cultivated practice,
and ever-wise counsel. Readers will be impressed by the currency, practicality, and clear
intentionality of the volume, evoking the same from those who regard it with the care with
which it was written.
Of particular importance in this ever-changing and increasingly connected world
is the role of culture and language. Bredekamp addresses these issues with honesty and
integrity, treating readers to a richly nuanced understanding of the important roles of
each in the development of young children. Cautiously, she reminds us that the words
“developmentally appropriate”—although bywords of the profession—must be deeply
contextualized in order to be understood and mastered. Indeed, in discussing how to
balance developmentally, individually, and contextually appropriate practices, Bredekamp
brilliantly notes that “a child with a disability acts like a magnifying glass on the
xiii
evelopmental appropriateness of an early childhood classroom.” In turn, early educators
d
must regard this seminal edition as the best possible lens through which to see and enlarge
what matters most in our field; with wisdom and prescience, it sheds all the light necessary
to advance our evolving, joyous profession and our critically important work on behalf of
children, their families, and their countries.
xiv
Brief Contents
Part 2 Learning and Developing from Birth to Age 8: Who We Teach 100
Chapter 4 Applying What We Know about Children’s Learning and Development. . . . . 1
00
xv
Table of Contents
xvi
Johann Pestalozzi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Friedrich Froebel. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Maria Montessori. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Early Childhood Movements in the United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
The Kindergarten Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Progressive Education . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
The Nursery School Movement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
The Child Care Movement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
A Wider View of Early Childhood History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
African Americans in Early Childhood History. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
Native American Early Childhood History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
Latino Early Childhood History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Bringing the Stories Together . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
The Story of Head Start . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
The Prekindergarten Story . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Building on a Tradition of Excellence. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
xvii
Part 2 Learning and Developing from Birth to Age 8: Who We Teach 100
Chapter 4 Applying What We Know about Children’s Learning
and Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
Understanding Development and Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
What Is Development? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102
What Is Learning?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
The Role of Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
The Relationship between Theory, Research, and Practice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103
Why Study Child Development and Learning?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Brain Development and Implications for Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
How the Brain Promotes Learning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Implications for Children. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106
Implications for Practice. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
Child Development Theories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
Erikson’s Psychosocial Theory of Human Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
Maslow’s Self-Actualization Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Piaget and Cognitive Developmental Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
Vygotsky and Sociocultural Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117
Bronfenbrenner’s Ecological Systems Theory of Development. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
Learning Theories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
B. F. Skinner and Behaviorism. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
Albert Bandura and Social Cognitive Theory. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128
The Role of Play in Development and Learning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
Types of Play . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
The Benefits of Play. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Play and Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Connecting Theory and Practice . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
xviii
Individual Differences in Ability. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153
The Language of Early Childhood Special Education. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154
What Teachers Should Know about Children with Disabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155
Seeing Children with Disabilities as Individuals: The Case of Autism . . . . . . . . . 155
What Teachers Should Know about Legal Requirements
for Children with Disabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157
Embracing Natural Learning Environments and Inclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161
Effective Practices for Children with Diverse Abilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162
Work on a Team. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Assess Young Children of Diverse Abilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163
Plan Individualized Instructional Strategies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164
xix
Communication with Families. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
Barriers to Effective Communication. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
Effective Communication Strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218
Family Engagement in Programs and Schools. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
Benefits of Family Involvement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227
Opportunities for Meaningful Family Engagement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228
Community Partnerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
A Framework for Building Partnerships with Families. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230
Clarify Preferences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
Communicate Preferences. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231
Negotiate Successfully. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232
Demonstrate Willingness to Learn and Change. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234
“W hich way?” asked Ned as, a few minutes later, they went
through the gate.
“Let’s go down to the river and along the road and see all the
booful automobiles,” said Laurie.
“It’s not my idea of a pleasant walk,” returned Ned, “to get entirely
covered with dust and then run over!”
“We’re not going to walk,” announced Polly. “Anyway, not yet.
We’re going this way.” She and Mae turned toward School Park.
“Not going to walk?” exclaimed Laurie. “What are we going to do?
Polly, don’t tell me you’ve gone and bought an automobile!”
“We’re going calling,” said Polly.
“What!” protested Ned. “Calling, did you say? Not much, Polly! At
least, I’m not.”
“Now, Ned Turner—” began Polly.
“Oh, never mind him,” broke in Laurie. “I’ll go calling with you,
Polly. I just love to go calling. Have you any one specially in mind?
Or shall we just take them as they come?”
They were crossing the street now diagonally, Polly and Mae in
the lead. Laurie was smoothing his hair and settling his tie
smirkingly. Ned looked rebellious. “Who are we going to call on?” he
demanded dejectedly.
“You’ll know soon enough,” laughed Polly. And he did, for the next
instant she had pushed open a little gate between the lilac hedges
and was leading the way up the short path to Miss Comfort’s door.
“Gee!” murmured Laurie. But he and Ned followed obediently and
stared questioningly at Polly while somewhere at the rear of the little
house, a bell jangled in response to her tug at the brown crockery
knob. “What’s the big idea?” whispered Laurie to Mae, who was
nearest. But Mae only shook her head. And then, with such
promptitude as to suggest to Ned that he had not just imagined that
face at the front window, the door opened, and Miss Comfort was
giving them welcome. There were introductions in the small hall,
during which Ned trod on Laurie’s foot and Laurie pushed Mae into
an umbrella-stand which had once been a length of drain-pipe and
which now bore a faded design of cat-o’-nine-tails and swallows; and
then, somehow, they were all seated in the front parlor, Laurie, who
had neglected in the confusion to leave his cap in the hall, trying to
stuff it into a side pocket.
The room was not over-furnished. There was a walnut sofa
covered with faded green rep across one corner, a marble-topped
walnut table between the two front windows, a bookcase midway of
the inner wall, a number of straight chairs placed formally along the
sides of the room, and an easy-chair at each window. There were
also two foot-stools covered with crewel work, one of which Ned
narrowly escaped, and a brightly hued Brussels carpet. A fireplace,
surmounted by a white marble shelf, was blankly, inexorably closed
by a glossy black sheet of iron. Two gilt candelabra adorned the
ends of the mantel, and a black marble clock, whose stumpy hands
had stopped at twelve minutes to nine on some long-past day, stood
squarely in the center. There was a purple and green square of
embroidery on the table and a few books of unexciting appearance.
Everything was spotlessly clean, immaculately neat, depressingly
orderly.
Polly and Mae, as usual, crowded into one of the easy-chairs, and
Miss Comfort sat erectly in the other. Miss Comfort proved to be
small and rather thin, with lightish hair that wasn’t brown and wasn’t
white. She had small, delicate features and dark eyes that remained
very bright and clear. Miss Comfort might be nearly seventy, as Polly
had stated, but there was something youthful in her pleasant face,
her quick movements, and her thin, soft voice. Laurie was receiving
these impressions when that thin, soft voice pronounced his name
and he discovered that his hostess had turned from the girls and was
looking toward him, her head pushed forward a little as if, despite
their brightness, her eyes were not as serviceable as they had been.
“Mr. Laurie,” Miss Comfort was saying, “I want to thank you for
your interest in my affairs. I do think it was extremely kind of you to
send that telegram to my brother-in-law. Although I am convinced
that nothing will come of it, I assure you that I appreciate your
helpfulness.”
It was rather a precise and formal little speech, and it is probable
that Miss Comfort had prepared it in advance of the occasion. It left
Laurie surprised and sputtering.
“But—but—why, that’s all right—if you mean—”
Polly came to his rescue: “It was mama who told, Laurie. She
really didn’t mean to, but if you knew her as well as I do you’d know
that she simply can’t keep a secret, no matter how hard she tried.”
“Oh,” said Laurie. “Well, you don’t need to thank me—us a bit,
Miss Comfort. I—we were mighty glad to do anything we could, and
we wish there was more we might do. I guess Polly’s told you that
that—er—that your brother-in-law hasn’t answered yet.”
Miss Comfort nodded. “Yes, and I’m not surprised. Mr. Goupil is a
very busy man, I suppose, and I dare say he hasn’t time to—to look
after all matters himself.”
“Well, if you ask me—” began Laurie indignantly.
“But she hasn’t,” interrupted Ned warningly. “I guess what Laurie
was going to say, Miss Comfort, is that he—that is, we—both of—
neither of us—” Laurie was smiling enjoyably—“can understand how
your brother-in-law could act so—so—”
“Rotten,” supplied the irrepressible Laurie.
“I know,” replied Miss Comfort. “Perhaps I can explain a little. You
might say that Mr. Goupil and I are strangers. Yes, that is scarcely an
exaggeration. My sister Amanda met him in New Jersey fourteen
years ago when she was teaching school there. Amanda was much
younger than I and—and impulsive. I knew nothing about Mr. Goupil
until she wrote to me from Chicago saying that she was married and
on her way west with her husband. I was dreadfully surprised, as you
can well understand, for Amanda was—” Miss Comfort hesitated,
coughed and continued—“was almost fifty years of age, and I had
never thought of her becoming married. In my surprise, I fear that my
letter to her was not—well, quite as sympathetic as it should have
been. I suppose I showed her that I was a little bit hurt because she
had not confided in me earlier. That was most unfortunate, because
it led to a—a misunderstanding. I tried very hard to atone, but she
never forgave me, and after two years she stopped answering my
letters.” Miss Comfort was silent a moment, gazing down at the thin
hands folded in her lap. “I fear,” she went on at length, “Amanda
gathered the impression that I didn’t approve of her husband. Well, I
don’t suppose I did. I mean that I didn’t approve of him for her. You
see, he was younger than Amanda by several years, and then he
was a foreigner.”
“A foreigner!” exclaimed Polly. “Why, I didn’t know that, Miss
Comfort.”
Miss Comfort nodded. “Yes, he was a Frenchman, Polly. Of course
there are undoubtedly many most estimable French gentlemen, but it
did seem to me that if Amanda had to marry she might have found a
man of her own race.” Miss Comfort sighed and then she laughed
apologetically. “I don’t know why I’m telling you all this. Oh, yes, I
was trying to explain about Mr. Goupil, wasn’t I? Well, you see, after
Amanda was married I never saw either her or her husband. They
lived in Chicago a year or so and then moved further west, and after
that I lost all trace of them until I received word lately of Amanda’s
death. After that came this letter from the lawyer about the house.
Maybe, you see, Mr. Goupil doesn’t feel very kindly toward me, and if
he doesn’t I don’t suppose I should blame him one bit.”
“This house belongs to him now?” asked Laurie.
“Yes. My mother left a will that gave everything to Amanda, but
allowed me the use of this place until Amanda’s death. Of course
mother never meant it the way she wrote it. She just got a little mixed
up, and as she didn’t employ a lawyer to do it for her, why, it stood
just as she wrote it. I’ve often wondered,” added Miss Comfort,
wrinkling her forehead, “what she did mean. I suppose she meant
me to live here until my death, and not Amanda’s.”
“I’ll bet you could break a will like that,” declared Laurie eagerly.
“So Mr. Whipple told me,” responded Miss Comfort. “He was the
lawyer. He’s dead now. But I didn’t like to do it. It seemed kind of—of
disrespectful to mother. Besides, I never had any suspicion that I
would outlast poor Amanda.”
In the ensuing silence Polly and Mae gazed sympathetically at
Miss Comfort, who, smoothing the old black dress over her knees,
appeared lost in her thoughts. Finally:
“Well,” began Laurie. Then he stopped, cleared his throat, and
said: “Look here, Miss Comfort, I’d like to ask you— It may sound
cheeky— Well, what I mean is, haven’t you—that is, are you—”
Laurie’s cheeks reddened as he floundered on. “Haven’t you any—
any means at all? Maybe it’s none of my business—”
“No, Mr. Laurie, I haven’t,” replied Miss Comfort quietly. “There
wasn’t ever much money after my father died, and mother’s will left
what there was to Amanda. That was just as it should have been, for
as long as I had this house I was quite all right.” She smiled gently.
“But, land sakes, I don’t want you young folks to trouble your heads
about me and my affairs. Troubles aren’t for the young, Mr. Laurie.”
“That’s all right,” was the dogged response, “but—but something—
somebody— It doesn’t seem right for you to have to go to—to that
place!”
“Why, I don’t know,” said Miss Comfort thoughtfully. “I guess lots of
perfectly respectable folks have gone to the poor-farm. I dare say
there’s no disgrace. And they do say that the—the institution is
conducted very nicely. No doubt I’ll be quite comfortable there. And
—and it isn’t as though I’d have to stay very long.”
“Oh,” exclaimed Ned relievedly, “then you expect to—” But Polly
interrupted him.
“Now, Miss Comfort,” cried Polly indignantly, “don’t you talk like
that! Why, goodness gracious, you aren’t old at all! The—the idea!”
“I should say not!” said Mae warmly. “The idea!”
Miss Comfort chuckled softly. “Well, I ain’t helpless yet, I know,
Polly, but I’m—” she coughed daintily— “I’m getting along in years,
my dear.”
“Seems to me,” exploded Laurie, “there ought to be some place in
this town where you could go. Wouldn’t you a whole lot rather live in
a—a—” he had started to say “barn,” but changed it to—“a—a shed
than go to that poor-farm place?”
“Why, yes, I don’t know but what I would,” said Miss Comfort, “as
long as it had a roof and I could go on with my work. But I’m afraid I
couldn’t even pay the rent for a shed, Mr. Laurie. Now I ain’t going to
let you talk a minute longer about me. Why, I’m just ashamed of
myself!” She arose quickly and crossed to the door with short, firm
steps. “Will you excuse me a minute?” she asked.
When she had gone the four visitors looked at each other silently.
Finally, “Rotten shame, I call it,” muttered Laurie. Ned nodded
agreement. Polly, whose gaze was fixed on Laurie expectantly, said
suddenly: “Laurie, if you have anything in mind I think you’d ought to
tell her. It might make her feel more comfortable.”
“Anything in mind?” echoed Laurie. “I haven’t. At least, only—”
Miss Comfort’s return with a dish of cake stopped him.
A little later they were outside again, walking silently away from
the little white house with the brown shutters. When they were at last
out of sight of the front windows Polly turned eagerly toward Laurie.
“What were you going to say?” she demanded. “You have thought
of some plan, haven’t you?”
Laurie hesitated, frowning thoughtfully. “Not much of a one,” he
answered. “I guess it doesn’t amount to anything. Only—well, now
look here, doesn’t it seem that there ought to be some place
somewhere in this town that would do for her? It wouldn’t have to be
much, would it? Maybe just a sort of shed that could be fixed up and
made comfortable? Or a nice stable that has rooms above it. You
know some stables have quarters for the coachman or chauffeur or
gardener. Maybe—”
“Why, I think it’s a perfectly stunning idea!” cried Polly. “No one
thought of that!”
“But she’d have to pay rent just the same, wouldn’t she?” asked
Ned dubiously. “Some rent, anyhow? And she said—”
“If we explained about her,” said Polly, “I’m sure no one would
think of asking rent for just a stable attic—” Laurie’s chuckles
interrupted. “Well, whatever you call it. Loft, isn’t it? Anyhow, perhaps
just a—a nominal rent would be all they’d ask.”
“Why don’t we look right now and see if we can’t find something?”
asked Mae excitedly.
“Why don’t we?” cried Polly eagerly.
“Just what I was about to propose,” said Laurie a bit patronizingly,
“when Ned butted in. Let’s start in and do the old burg systematically.
Which way shall we go first?”
Dusk had settled over Orstead when the four, footsore and weary,
returned to the shop. Their quest had been fruitless.
CHAPTER X
THE COACH MAKES A PROMISE
M ae Ferrand was not on hand the next afternoon when the twins
and Bob Starling reached the Widow Deane’s. Mae, Polly
informed them, had gone to Poughkeepsie to spend Sunday with her
grandmother. They decided to go down to the river for their walk this
afternoon, and were soon descending Walnut Street. At the station
they crossed the tracks, passed the freight-shed, and went
southward beside the river, blue and sparkling in the spring sunlight.
Then they had to return again to the tracks and cross a bridge that
spanned a narrow inlet. The inlet connected the river with a shallow
stretch of marsh and water known as the Basin which lay between
the tracks and the big rock-quarry. The quarry was slowly but very
surely removing the hill called Little Crow, and the face of the quarry
was fully eighty feet in height from the boulder-strewn base to the
tree-topped summit. It was here that stone was being obtained for
the work on which Mr. Starling’s company was engaged. Spur-tracks
ran from the railroad to the base of the high cliff, about two hundred
yards distant, and from the railroad again to the stone-walled dock
wherein the quarry company loaded to lighters for water
transportation. The Basin was a favorite place for skating in winter,
and Ned reminded the others of several episodes of three months
back.
“Remember the time Elk Thurston tried to get ashore over there by
the rushes?” asked Ned. “Every time he put his foot down the ice
broke and let him through.”
“And he got angrier and angrier,” laughed Polly, “and tried to hurry
and—”
“Fell flat,” chuckled Laurie. “They told him the ice wouldn’t hold
him over there, but he always knows a little more than any one else.
And, look, there’s the old Pequot Queen over there yet. It’s a wonder
some one doesn’t take her away or break her up or something.”
“Nobody knows who she belongs to, I heard,” said Bob. “The old
ferry company went bust three or four years back, and the quarry
company can’t touch her because she isn’t theirs. I heard they had a
bill for dockage as long as my arm against the Queen, though.”
“Still, that’s the quarry dock she’s in,” said Ned, “and she must be
in the way there. I don’t see why they don’t push her out and let her
float down the river.”
“She’d be a menace to navigation,” replied Bob knowingly. “The
law would get them if they tried that.”
“Sort of like a fellow driving an automobile into your front yard and
leaving it there and going off,” laughed Laurie. “You couldn’t put it out
into the street because that would be against traffic rules and you
couldn’t take possession of it—”
“You could send it to a garage, though,” said Bob.
“Yes, and pay the garage bills!”
“The quarry folks could see that it got on fire accidently,” said Ned.
“It would only burn to the water-edge. The hull would be just as
much in the way as the whole thing,” objected Bob.
“I hope they’ll let it stay just where it is,” said Polly. “I’m sure it
comes in very handy when we come here skating. Remember that
perfectly ferocious day just after Christmas, Laurie, when we were all
nearly frozen and you made a fire in the—the fireplace—”
“Fireplace!” echoed Ned. “That’s corking!”
“Well, the—the—why, I don’t see why it isn’t a fireplace, Smarty.
It’s the place you build the fire, isn’t it?”
“Boiler,” said Bob.
“Well, anyway, it just about saved my feet from freezing right off,”
declared Polly. “And we had a lot of fun on the boat, and I hope no
one will do anything to it at all!”
“Guess you needn’t worry,” said Laurie. “Looks as if she’d stay
right here and rot to pieces. Guess she’s got a good start already.”
Their homeward way led them through the woods and around the
slope of Little Crow Hill, at first by an old wood-road and then by
devious trails through the now leafless forest. That was the nearer
way, but there was a longer, more arduous, and far more attractive
route that took them to the summit of Little Crow and laid the world at
their feet; for from above the face of the quarry they could look for
miles and miles up and down the broad river and across it and
westward to the rising foot-hills of the mountains. Since to-day was
as clear as a whistle and the air held that crisp quality that makes
exertion a pleasure, Bob’s suggestion that they go up to the top of
the hill was accepted with enthusiasm by Ned and Laurie. Polly,
glancing solicitously at her dress, hesitated. But she was, in the
boys’ parlance, “a good sport,” and she didn’t want to spoil their fun.
So after a brief moment she, too, agreed, although with less
enthusiasm, and they turned northward from the wood-road and
ascended, for a time almost parallel to the railroad, a narrow path
where the branches clutched mischievously at Polly’s skirt and
proved that she had had cause for indecision.
Laurie led, with Polly next. For a while the going was not hard, but
then outcropping boulders set the path to twisting and winding, and
soon they were helping themselves upward by branches and setting
their feet carefully in the moist tangles of root and moss. It was half-
way up a more than usually severe stretch, when every muscle was
tense, that Laurie suddenly stopped short, turned about and
exclaimed “Say!” in such an unexpected and explosive burst of
sound that Polly, thrown from her balance by her attempt to avoid
collision with Laurie, and startled out of her wits, fell back against
Ned. Only Bob’s prompt support from the rear saved the situation.
The three glared at the offender in outrage.
“Say,” exclaimed Ned, “what do you want to do? Break all our
necks? What’s the matter with you, anyway, stopping like that and
shouting like a crazy man?”
Laurie stared back for an instant as though he neither saw Ned
nor heard him. Then his gaze fell and he turned away. “Sorry,” he
muttered.
“But—but what was it?” gasped Polly. “Did you see a snake or—or
something?”
Laurie shook his head and began to climb again. “I just thought of
something,” he said.
“Well, for the love of lime-drops!” scolded his brother. “Don’t think
any more until we get to the top, you poor prune!”
They went on, but it wasn’t difficult to perceive that Laurie wasn’t
obeying Ned’s injunction. If he had been he wouldn’t have stumbled
over everything in his course and he wouldn’t have missed the path
above the big fern-clad rock near the summit and gone wandering off
into the brush all by himself until called back by the others. Ned
observed him pityingly as he sheepishly rejoined them.
“We’ll have to hold you when we get to the top,” said Ned
crushingly. “If we don’t you’ll probably walk right over the edge! What
in the world’s got into you?”
“Nothing,” answered Laurie, an absent expression possessing his
features again. “What are you stopping here for?”
“Well, there is something,” said Ned accusingly, “and I know what
it is. You’ve got some crazy idea in your bean.” He turned to Polly.
“He’s always like that when he thinks he’s discovered something big,
like perpetual motion or—or how to make a million dollars. We’ll
have to watch him until he recovers, or he will do himself harm. You
go first, Bob, and I’ll keep an eye on him.”
The rest of the climb was accomplished without further incident,
and they at last emerged in a small cleared space at the top of the
hill. I don’t mean cleared in the sense of free from rubbish, for
occasional picnic-parties had offended against nature as they have a
way of doing, and the scanty grass was littered with paper and
empty cracker-boxes and an occasional bottle or tin. Ned viewed the
scene disgustedly.
“Funny what human hogs some folks are,” he growled, kicking an
empty olive-bottle over the edge of the cliff. He paused until, after an
appreciable interval, the distant tinkling sound of breaking glass met
his ears. “It’s enough to make you sick. Folks who can’t stand a
speck of dust on their automobile will get out and eat their lunch and
leave the place looking like a pigsty. Ought to be brought back and
made to eat every scrap of the mess they leave behind them.”
“Right-o,” agreed Bob, “but I don’t believe these folks were
automobilists, Ned. It’s a long way up here from the road.”
“Doesn’t matter,” said Ned, “whether they came in a car or walked;
they’re hogs just the same.”
“Well, let’s sit down and get our breaths,” said Polly, suiting action
to words. “That’s a perfectly frightful climb, isn’t it. I don’t think I tore
my dress, though.” She was making inspection and looked vastly
relieved as no damage showed.
“Better luck going down,” said Bob cheerfully, and Polly made a
face at him as he sprawled beside Ned. Laurie had not joined them
on the grass, but instead was lounging toward the edge of the cliff,
his hands in his pockets.
“Laurie, please don’t go so close,” called Polly from a dozen feet
away. “It makes me feel sort of squirmy.”
Perhaps Laurie didn’t hear her. He was very near the edge now,
close by a pine that leaned outward at an angle, its roots clinging to
the thin crust of earth that hid the rock beneath. Ned glanced toward
him, and an expression of disapproval came to his face.
“He thinks he’s smart,” he said contemptuously. “He’s always liked
to walk on roofs and act silly goat that way.” He raised his voice.
“Laurie!”
Laurie gave a start. “Yes?” he answered. Then—well, then
everything happened all at once and with incredible speed. They
saw Laurie grasp suddenly at the leaning tree, saw him miss it, saw
one foot disappear over the edge in a tiny cloud of brown dust, and
then, in almost the same instant, Laurie just wasn’t there!
CHAPTER XII
ON THE QUARRY SHELF