Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface xvii
vii
viii Contents
Neglectful Parents 73
Efforts to Explain the Behavior of Neglectful Parents 74
Substance-Abusing Families 82
Domestic Violence and Neglect 84
Plight of the Parent and the Social Worker 85
Summary 85
Ethics 358
Professionalism 359
Ethnic Competence 359
Personal Traits 360
Effectively Juggling Tasks and Responsibilities 360
Dealing with Frustrations and Pressures 361
Facing the Challenges of Working in Child Protection 364
An Eye Toward Prevention 365
Prevention Efforts in Schools 366
Life Skills Training 366
Preparation for Parenthood 367
Self-Protection Training 368
Educational Services for the Community 369
Schools Helping At-Risk Families 370
Prevention Efforts with Families 370
Evaluating Home Visitation Programs 371
Parent/Child Screening and Prevention 372
Culturally Sensitive Prevention 374
Effective Prevention 374
Working Toward a Better Tomorrow 376
Rethinking Child Protection 378
Creating a Unified Response 379
Looking Within, Between, and Beyond Agencies 380
Beyond Child Protection: The Need for Societal Changes 382
Reversing the Trend Toward Socially Impoverished Families 382
Supporting Parenting 383
Realigning Societal Values 384
What Does the Future Hold? 385
Research Needs 386
Summary 386
References 389
Index 433
Preface
For Chay, Andrew, Becky, and Ruby
We live in a culture that values comfort and a sense of well-being. Even in today’s difficult
economy, the expectation is that, despite having to make some sacrifices, each citizen has
the opportunity to achieve this sense of well-being. Yet many members of our culture—our
children—are being beaten, neglected, and sexually exploited in alarming numbers. Every
10 seconds, a child is being abused or neglected.
Granted, child abuse and neglect have existed for centuries. And although some
sources suggest that the incidence of child maltreatment has actually decreased slightly in
the last few years, the fact remains that children are still being abused—in some cases more
seriously than ever. Why has child maltreatment become such a serious issue? The answer
may lie in several areas. We live in a more violent society than ever before. We are barraged
with violent images, both in the news and in our entertainment. Crime statistics attest to
the impact of this desensitization. The intensity and seriousness of the abuse perpetrated
against children does, as well.
Does the answer also lie in the fact that the child protection system, set up to safeguard
the lives of the children at risk for maltreatment, is not achieving its goal? As a former pro-
tective services worker, I recognize that individual professionals within protective services
are often dedicated and well meaning, but the system as a whole is still not adequately pro-
tecting children, nor are these services often our fiscal priority.
What can be done to reverse the disturbing fact of child maltreatment? And how
can society, and more specifically the child welfare system, better protect the children
at risk?
These questions can be addressed from several vantage points. We look not only to
raise societal awareness and increase research into causes of abuse and neglect, but we must
also change social policy, triage the child welfare system, and provide better training for
protective workers, not only in the skills important to do their job but in culturally sensitive
ways to approach a variety of people from many different backgrounds.
After over 30 years of teaching courses on child abuse and neglect, many years in the
child protection system, and over 40 years in the field of social services, I have written this
book, now in the nineth edition, to prepare future and even current professionals to bet-
ter intervene and treat the children and families at risk. This book draws on my years of
practice to present an all-encompassing view of maltreatment, in its various guises, from
symptoms of abuse and neglect to motivations of those who abuse and neglect children, as
well as how the social services system intervenes. The questions asked of me by students,
xvii
xviii Preface
social service workers, and trainees have helped to shape the direction of the book. My
experiences not only as a protective social worker but also as a therapist treating victims,
families, and perpetrators and now a clergywoman have helped to provide ideas for the
illustrations and examples.
considered in Chapter 11, distinguishing between intervention through the juvenile court
process and prosecution through the criminal court system.
Chapters 12 and 13 outline the models of treatment available for abused and neglected
children and their families. Therapy approaches for each type of maltreatment are consid-
ered separately. Chapter 14 discusses foster care as a therapeutic tool.
Following this examination of intervention, Chapter 15 provides a view of the experi-
ences of adults who, as children, never reported abuse. The treatment available for these
survivors is discussed.
The experience of working in child protection is the subject of Chapter 16—from a
typical day in the life of a protective social worker and the challenges the work to the part
that workers must play in prevention and in planning for the future.
In this ninth edition, I have continued to search more current research. Majority
of the most recent research is now coming from Britain, Australia, and Europe as these
countries meet the challenges of responding to child abuse and neglect. I have used
these sources when the information appeared to be applicable to the United States.
I have also continued to use classic writings in the field as well as a few more recent,
albeit smaller, studies.
In response to reviewer requests, this edition has been reorganized into 16 chapters to
correspond with the typical academic semester. The information on intervention as well
as case management is now contained in Chapter 10. A new Chapter 16 focuses on the im-
portant aspects of child protection work including the need for social workers to not only
pay attention to prevention but also to use their expertise to anticipate the best solutions
for the future.
There continues to be the attention to military families reflected in the eighth edition.
Additional topics such as sexting, and sexual trafficking have also been added.
Understanding Child Abuse and Neglect can be used as a text for undergraduate as well
as graduate courses in social work, human services, psychology, and sociology or in coun-
seling, family studies, and education programs.
Acknowledgments
Many people have contributed directly or indirectly to the writing of this book. My
thanks go first to my family—especially to my husband, Jim; my sons, Chay and An-
drew; and my daughter in-law, Becky. They continue to encourage me. In addition, my
granddaughter, Ruby Louise has reminded me of the promise of childhood and how it
must be protected.
I have learned a great deal from my students, both those in the behavioral sci-
ences and those in theology, whose interest, enthusiasm, and inquiries have done much
to stimulate this endeavor. As graduates, they have continued their support, often as
close friends. My special thanks also go to Stephanie Flynn for her encouragement and
willingness to chat about the frustrations of writing. I thank my able research assistant,
Peggy Prasinos, who knows more about computers and how to find information than
I ever hope to. Her support, as well as her computer-generated cartoons, was essential
in keeping me on task. And she is always ready to tackle a new task with an enthusiasm
that is contagious.
xx Preface
I thank the following reviewers for their helpful comments: Pam Reid, U niversity
of Akron; Rachel Happel, Missouri State University; Beth Walker, Western New Mexico
University; Melody Loya, West Texas A&M University; and Brian Flynn, Binghamton
University.
I also thank Carly Czech, my Pearson editor, and Mary Stone and Doug Bell of
PreMediaGlobal, Inc., and all the dedicated and hard-working folks who worked to make
this edition possible.
Cynthia Crosson-Tower
Harvest Counseling and Consultation
M
altreatment of children is deeply entwined with historical values and per-
spectives. The concept of child maltreatment has been defined and rede-
fined throughout history. Society is slowly evolving from viewing children
as property, subject to the whims of the family and society, to at least recognizing that
children may have rights of their own. Each period in history—as well as each cul-
ture—has a concept of how children should be treated.
Children as Property
Early in history, children were seen as the property of their families—usually headed
and ruled by fathers. Children looked to their fathers for their very existence. Fathers
had the right to determine not only the manner in which their child was cared for but
also if the child were to live or die.
1
2 Chapter 1
to the queen, who had the misfortune to become pregnant by the “highest Stewart of all,”
ostensibly the queen’s consort. As she bemoans her disgrace, the balladeer sings:
She tyed it in her apron
And she’s thrown it in the sea;
Says, “Sink ye, swim ye, bonny wee babe
You’ll ne’er get m’air o’ me.” (Friedman, 1956)
In Germany, newborns were sometimes plunged into frigid water to test their ability
to survive. A similar ritual was practiced by some tribes of Native Americans. The child
was fit to live only if he or she surfaced and cried. Records in England in the 1620s attest to
the burial of infants murdered by drowning, burning, and scalding.
Issues of Dependence
Children were dependent on their families not only for their early existence but also for
their later survival. The feudal system in Europe established a concept of ownership and
articulated a hierarchy of rights and privileges. Children were at the bottom, and the chil-
dren of poor families fared the worst. If parents were unable to support themselves and
their children, the fate of the family was often the poorhouse. Poorhouses offered a mea-
ger subsistence, which often ended in death for the weaker members of the family.
In 1601, the Elizabethan Poor Law sought to give some help to families and children
by dictating that relief must be offered to the destitute. The poor were separated into three
categories:
1. The able-bodied poor—those who were considered capable and were, therefore,
forced to work
2. The impotent poor—those who were old, disabled, or mothers, who were ex-
cused from work and for whom aid was provided by the state
3. Dependent children—those who were orphaned or abandoned and for whom aid
was provided
The fate of children still depended largely on their family constellation. Able-bodied
people were sent to work. In some cases, mothers and their children were provided for at
home by contributions of food and clothing but never money. Education was not viewed
as a right or privilege of such families (Popple and Leighninger, 2010).
For those who were not poor, children fared as their families saw fit. Still seen as
property, some children were slaves to their guardians, performing whatever tasks were
expected of them. Certainly, the family life of a farming culture required that each mem-
ber take part. For most children, this arrangement was satisfactory, but some children
were assigned jobs far beyond their abilities or were beaten or neglected.
The early United States saw the arrival of immigrants other than Europeans. African
slaves contributed greatly to the economic development of the new country, not only in
the South but also in New England. The children of southern plantation slaves owed their
allegiance to their parents as well as the masters who owned them. They were thought
of as property and had little control over whether they worked, were sold (often without
parents or siblings), or were used sexually by those more powerful. In the North, black
children were not exempt from almshouses until 1822, when the Quakers in Philadelphia
The Maltreatment of Children from a Historical Perspective 3
established the first orphanage for such children (Ambrosino et al., 2011; Popple and
Leighninger, 2010; ten Bensel, Rheinberg, and Radbill, 1997).
Asian and Pacific Island immigrants came to the United States with their own values
about dependent children. One significant value was that the family was involved with
the care of the individual from the time of birth until death (Mass and Yap, 2000), which
meant that dependent children were often absorbed into the ethnic community. Native
American children were also generally regarded as the responsibility of the community. In
addition, Hispanic children relied on extended family members or friends to supplement
or substitute for parental nurturance.
Issues of Discipline
The subject of discipline has always been controversial. Many methods used in early
Western culture would certainly be open to censure today. The philosophies of our fore-
bears, however, differ from those of most modern-day societies. Not only in the home but in
the classroom, corporal punishment was a means to mold children into moral, God-fearing,
respectful human beings. Parents were expected to raise religious, dedicated, morally
sound, and industrious contributors to the community. Obedience was the primary virtue
to develop in children. Disobedience often carried significant fines; even older children
were subject to such rules. An 1854 Massachusetts law stated,
If any children above sixteen years old and of sufficient understanding shall curse
or smite their natural father or mother, they shall be put to death, unless it can be
sufficiently testified that the parents have been unchristianly negligent in the edu-
cation of such children or so provoked them by extreme and cruel correction that
they have been forced thereunto to preserve themselves from death or maiming.
(Bremner, 1970, p. 68)
The schoolmaster or mistress was accorded the same right to use corporal
punishment:
School masters in colonial Boston were conscious of the need to maintain the great
English tradition of “education through pain” and, if anything added refinements
to the flagellant tools they had inherited from the old country. One Bostonian
invented an instrument called a “flapper”—a heavy piece of leather six inches in
diameter with a hole in the middle which was fixed to a wooden handle. Every
stroke on a bare bit of flesh raised an instant blister. (Inglis, 1978, p. 29)
Theologian John Calvin was of no help to children in the treatment accorded them
by their elders. Calvin spoke of breaking a child’s will in the hope of saving the spirit from
evil. Discipline was severe in the hope that children could be transformed into God-fear-
ing individuals.
For a short period during the eighteenth century, the treatment of children improved.
Philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau spoke of children as inherently good and encour-
aged educational methods that would enhance their positive development, not break their
spirit (Lenoir-Degoumois, 1983).
Other cultures had their own interpretations about discipline. Many (e.g., Asian/
Pacific, Hispanic) stressed the dominance of elders or males who had the right to determine
4 Chapter 1
how to deal with children. The strong kinship relationships of African Americans and the
community responsibility inherent in Native American cultures indicated that the care
and discipline of children were shared by parent figures.
Child Labor
One of the earliest forms of child labor was indenture—a system in which parents appren-
ticed their children to masters who taught them a trade but who were free to use them as
virtual slaves in exchange for room and board. Indenture began at a very young age and
continued until 14 or 16 years of age for boys and 21 years for girls. Writings by historians,
novelists, and social reformers show that apprentice masters could be cruel—concerned
more for the work they could extract than for the development or abilities of their juvenile
charges. Charles Dickens wrote of Oliver Twist’s days as an apprentice to an undertaker.
Exposed to death in its basic forms, fed very little, and chided and belittled by his master’s
older apprentice, Oliver thought he had little recourse. In fact, English society assumed he
had inherited a good lot and one for which he should be most thankful.
Indenture and child labor were also issues in early United States. As the Industrial
Revolution progressed, the practice of prematurely bringing children into the labor mar-
ket began to be a concern. Children were brought to the colonies to work until they were
24 years old. Child labor was seen as an inexpensive boon to the labor market, since a
child could be hired for less wages than an adult. Some jobs, such as chimney sweeping
and mining, were suited to children’s small bodies (Hindman, 2002; Mintz, 2006; Rose
and Fatout, 2003; ten Bensel et al., 1997).
As the 1800s dawned in the United States, the role of children remained little changed.
They continued to be the property of their parents, who could choose to beat them, ne-
glect them, or send them out to work. As the population increased and society became
more impersonal, assaults on children were more easily hidden.
In the late 1880s, the settlement house movement evolved. It contributed much to the
future of children and their families and had a substantial impact on the reduction of child
labor. The settlement houses became known through the establishment of Toynbee Hall, as
a result of the influence of Arnold Toynbee in London. Inspired by the dedication of such
an act, Jane Addams established Hull House in the Chicago slums. Hull House not only
bridged the gap between new and more established immigrants, but it was the impetus
for later reforms of benefit to children. One of Addams’s special concerns was child labor:
Our very first Christmas at Hull House, when we as yet knew nothing of child la-
bor, a number of little girls refused the candy which was offered them as part of
the Christmas good cheer, saying simply that they “worked in a candy factory and
could not bear the sight of it.” We discovered that for six weeks they had worked
from seven in the morning until nine at night and they were exhausted as well as
satiated. The sharp consciousness of stern economic conditions was thrust upon us
in the midst of the season of good will. (Addams, 1910, p. 148)
Addams also described the dangerous conditions:
During the same winter three boys from the Hull House club were injured at one
machine in a neighborhood factory for lack of a guard which would have cost but
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
1 0ᴴ 56ᵐ 35.1ˢ +31°36′39″ f pF, R, 20″d, *14m 20″p.
2 39.3 31 38 24 e F, R, 20″d, *12m 20″n.
3 49.0 31 22 14 h₀ F, mE110°, 60″l.
4 0 57 5.7 32 4 12 e eF, st. *13m 30″np.
5 54.5 32 17 41 e vF, R, 25″d, *14m 30″sf.
6 0 58 8.9 32 8 33 e vF, R, 25″d, *9 1′nf.
7 22.3 31 33 12 e eF st.
8 41.8 31 45 33 f pF, R, S, Δ2 faint*, bM.
9 42.7 31 17 58 f pF, st. 2*13, 14 1.5′p.
10 54.7 31 16 30 g F, cE0°, 30″l.
11 58.0 31 43 5 g F, cE130°, 30″l, bM.
12 59.7 32 5 33 e vF, R, 30″d.
13 0 59 13.9 31 56 21 f vF, st. *16m40″sf.
14 28.2 31 31 43 f vF, st. *15m 1.5′f.
15 51.6 32 33 48 g vF, E140°, 45″l.
16 58.2 32 1 58 f vF, E60°, 20″l 3f*.
17 58.8 31 41 27 f eF, eS.
18 1 0 0.7 31 54 35 e F, st.
19 3.6 31 18 39 e vF, st. d. nuc.
20 6.4 31 29 19 e vF, 1E, 20″l.
21 8.2 31 42 16 e vF, st.
22 10.9 31 43 12 h vF, E90°, 1′l.
23 15.0 32 24 1 e eF, eS 2*10, 11m1′nf.
24 18.9 31 30 22 g vF, cE, S, *15m40″s.
25 22.0 31 1 42 e vF, st.
26 22.1 32 22 51 e eF, R, 30″d, *12m1.5′nf.
27 22.9 31 31 29 f FcE60°1′l, *16m40″np.
28 25.0 31 45 17 f eF, E, eS.
29 29.0 31 54 48 h₀ Fv, mE160°, 40″l*13m1′s.
30 33.3 31 54 41 e eF, E, eS.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
31 39.3 31 25 23 h F, mE130°, 1′l.
32 43.2 32 17 18 e vF, R, 40″d, *14m30″s.
33 59.1 31 35 14 g eF, eS, st.
34 1 1 3.5 32 38 9 e vF, cE40°*11m1′nf.
35 11.3 31 13 16 h₀ vF, 310°, 1′l.
36 19.6 31 47 9 f F, S, E60°, *14m1′s.
37 24.5 31 25 17 f F, st. *14m1′np.
38 27.8 31 52 56 f eF, vS, *15m20″p.
39 32.7 31 45 48 e eF, st. in line with 2f*.
40 50.3 31 45 57 e eF, iR, *14m1′s.
41 58.8 31 25 54 e pF, R, 25″d. no nuc.
42 1 2 5.5 31 34 21 e vF, st. *10m20″s.
43 20.4 31 29 4 e vF, R, 45″d. no nuc.
44 22.3 31 18 42 f F, st. and sev f*.
45 26.4 32 3 22 e vF, st. *11m20″s.
46 32.0 32 6 19 e eF, iR*14m30″sf.
47 39.7 31 30 21 g vF, cE80°, S.
48 48.5 31 47 5 f F, st. *15m1′nf.
49 49.0 31 41 39 f eF, vS, *15m30″f.
50 49.8 31 57 3 f eF, st. *14m1′np.
51 1 3 5.3 31 42 7 f vF, st. 2*14m1′f.
52 8.0 32 14 51 e eF, st.
53 26.4 31 43 18 f vF, st. Δ2vF*.
54 37.6 31 30 51 f eF, st. bet. 2*.
55 57.6 31 55 41 f eF, st. *12m15″p.
56 1 4 16.4 32 2 9 f vF, st. bet. 2*.
57 1 5 1.6 31 48 22 e eF, st. *12m1′s.
I.C.
1618 0 59 3.4 31 44 31 g₀ pF, cE, 150° 25″l, bM.
1619 1 0 28.6 32 23 57 f pF, st. bet. 2*11, 12m.
N.G.C. 379 and 372 are probably the same object, with α of 370,
and δ the mean of the two N.G.C. positions. There is no other
object in the immediate vicinity.
400
401 Faint stars in these positions; no nebulae near.
402
390, Faint star, 16m. in this position. No trace of a nebula.
TABLE X
Field II of Nebulae
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
1 1ᴴ 39ᵐ 32.1ˢ +31°52′58″ f F, S.
2 41.7 32 46 3 e eF, pS.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
3 43.4 32 4 25 d eeF, S.
4 46.7 31 29 2 f vF, S.
5 50.4 32 7 35 e eF, pS.
6 55.6 31 24 29 e eF, eS.
7 59.0 32 10 21 f vF, vS.
8 1 40 27.5 31 24 17 h₀ eeF, S.
9 48.3 31 30 29 e eeF, vS.
10 50.4 31 37 46 e eeF, vS.
11 1 41 5.6 31 44 9 e eF, S.
12 8.9 31 55 48 e vF, vS.
13 9.4 31 59 34 f vF, pS.
14 20.2 31 53 23 e eF, vS.
15 32.6 32 20 2 f vF, S.
16 37.1 31 55 40 e eF, vS.
17 47.6 32 16 38 f eF, vS.
18 51.5 31 55 50 e eeF, S.
19 1 42 0.5 31 56 38 e eeeF S.
20 0.8 32 28 25 f vF, S.
21 15.8 32 11 28 g eF, 30″l.
22 16.4 31 52 43 e eeF, eS.
23 21.1 31 55 41 e eeF, eS.
24 23.5 31 57 24 f F, S.
25 31.5 32 0 9 g vF, S.
26 37.8 32 42 19 e eeF, S.
27 41.4 32 34 24 e eeF, S.
28 43.5 31 29 20 f eeF, eS.
29 44.4 32 10 20 g pF, 30″l.
30 50.4 32 19 55 f vF, S.
31 50.9 32 47 16 e eF, S.
32 51.2 31 24 50 e eeF, eS.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
33 58.0 32 0 4 e eeF, eS.
34 1 43 2.7 32 52 33 f eF, S.
35 5.3 31 51 52 e eeeF, eS.
36 7.0 31 48 17 f pF, S.
37 7.5 32 32 4 w eF,40″d.
38 7.7 31 56 36 f vF, vS.
39 8.6 31 54 15 e eeF, eS.
40 9.1 31 53 1 f eF, eS.
41 9.3 32 6 11 e eeF, vS.
42 12.0 31 52 35 f eeF, eS.
43 12.2 32 22 58 f eF, S.
44 13.1 31 51 39 h eeF, S.
45 13.2 31 59 34 e eeF, vS.
46 13.4 32 2 32 e eeF, eS.
47 17.9 31 57 14 f vF, vS.
48 19.6 32 25 39 f vF, vS.
49 20.7 31 50 3 h eeeF, S.
50 22.6 32 36 9 e eeF, vS.
51 22.6 31 49 17 e eeF, S.
52 23.8 31 47 57 e eeF, eS.
53 29.5 31 52 29 f vF, S.
54 30.5 32 27 43 f pF, pS.
55 37.6 31 53 20 e eF, eS.
56 39.0 31 56 43 f eF, eS.
57 39.2 32 28 21 f vF, S.
58 39.3 32 13 46 e eeF, vS.
59 39.9 31 53 5 e eeF, eS.
60 43.4 31 53 22 e eeF, eS.
61 46.8 31 52 18 f eeF, eS.
62 48.9 32 16 44 f eF, vS.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
63 56.4 32 18 51 f eF, vS.
64 58.8 32 0 10 e eeeF, vS.
65 1 44 0.7 32 27 29 e eeF, vS.
66 0.8 32 9 58 e eeF, eS.
67 1.9 32 0 17 f vF, vS.
68 4.0 32 29 4 e eeeF, S.
69 8.4 32 24 6 e eF, vS.
70 11.3 32 24 47 f F, pS.
71 14.9 32 12 48 e eeF, vS.
72 20.7 32 25 54 f vF, S.
73 24.6 32 4 37 f eeF, eS.
74 24.6 32 9 38 f eF, eS.
75 34.9 32 5 34 f eeF, eS.
76 43.5 32 27 34 e eeF, pS.
77 47.5 31 33 13 f eF, eS.
78 52.7 32 24 24 e eF, vS.
79 56.0 32 14 24 e eeeF, vS.
80 57.4 32 4 2 e eeF, S.
81 1 46 28.6 31 22 2 f eeF, eS.
TABLE XI
Field III of Nebulae
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
1 10ᴴ 59ᵐ 59.4ˢ +29°22′40″ e eeF, 25″d.
2 11 0 2.1 29 23 37 e 35″d.
3 14.7 29 46 56 e eF, 30″d.
4 22.0 29 15 59 e vF, 20″d.
5 23.5 29 5 59 f eF, 30″d.
6 25.8 29 27 21 f vF, 30″d.
7 42.5 28 39 11 e ef, 15″d.
8 56.1 29 20 10 d eeF, 30″d.
9 11 1 1.0 28 51 3 e eF, 20″d.
10 5.2 29 10 31 e eF, 25″d.
11 19.5 29 22 46 e eeF, 15″d.
12 22.4 28 39 12 w eF, 30″d, open spiral.
13 23.9 29 12 21 e vF, 25″d.
14 24.8 29 19 4 h₀ eeF, E165°, 35″×10″
15 27.3 29 32 18 d eeF, 15″d.
16 28.4 29 5 32 e vF, 30″d.
17 28.4 29 12 58 d eF, 20″d.
18 29.2 29 31 11 e eF, 15″d.
19 32.3 29 6 30 h₀ eeF, 3160°.
20 36.6 29 17 52 d eeF, 20″ d, some structure.
21 38.6 29 17 13 f eF, 20″d.
22 53.4 29 19 33 e eF, E60°, 30″×15″.
23 56.6 29 54 3 d eF, 30″d.
24 11 2 2.2 29 36 46 d eeF, 15″d.
25 5.7 29 50 3 w eeF, 45″d, open spiral.
26 17.2 28 57 27 e eF, 20″d.
27 24.0 28 45 9 g eF, E160°, 40″×20″.
28 30.3 29 33 6 e eeF, 10″d.
29 36.0 31 14 51 e vF, 25″d.
30 36.4 29 43 59 e eeF, 10″d.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
31 37.9 29 24 6 d eeF, 20″d.
32 38.7 29 26 44 e eeF, 15″d.
33 38.8 29 44 12 e eeF, 15″d.
34 39.8 29 20 17 e eeF, 15″d.
35 40.3 29 54 55 e eeF, 15″d.
36 41.2 29 27 20 w eeF, nuc. 10″d, ring, 30″d.
37 41.4 28 55 57 e eF, 15″d.
38 42.8 29 23 45 d vF, 15″d.
39 44.9 29 23 51 e eF, 10″d.
40 47.3 29 18 17 k vF, E150°, 45″×15″.
41 48.0 29 43 23 g₀ eeF, E40°, 20″×10″.
42 48.3 29 21 21 e eF, 15″d.
43 54.0 29 21 19 g₀ eF, 30″×10″.
44 55.7 29 35 33 e F, 20″d.
45 56.6 28 55 41 e eF, 35″d.
46 58.2 29 13 50 g eeF, E50°, 30″×10″.
47 11 3 4.1 29 10 39 a eeF, 15″d, structure.
48 4.3 29 38 56 g₀ eeF, E80°, 20″×10″.
49 21.6 29 1 14 d eF, 15″d.
50 22.6 29 18 15 d eeF, 20″d.
51 23.4 29 17 21 e vF, 20″d.
52 23.6 29 39 35 e eF, 20″d.
53 24.3 29 40 11 e eeF, 20″d.
54 27.9 29 9 3 f eF, 15″d.
55 28.6 30 7 9 f eeF, 30″d.
56 28.7 29 0 47 d eeF, 15″d.
57 30.1 28 49 9 e eeF, 20″d.
58 31.4 29 43 22 e F, 15″d.
59 31.5 29 28 6 e eF, 15″d.
60 32.5 29 14 55 e eF, 15″d.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
61 33.4 28 57 49 e eF, 15″d.
62 35.8 29 18 9 f vF, 20″d.
63 38.5 29 23 55 e eeF, 10″d.
64 39.6 29 23 9 a? eF, 35″×25″. E35°,
a miniature Dumb-bell.
65 39.7 29 25 39 e eeeF, 10″d.
66 40.1 29 25 48 e eeeF, 10″d.
67 40.3 29 23 57 e eeF, 10″d.
68 41.3 29 21 55 g₀ eF, E110°, 30″*10″.
69 41.9 29 22 21 e eF, 20″d.
70 43.7 30 7 14 e eeF, 20″d.
71 44.7 29 22 38 e eeF, 20″d.
72 46.2 29 28 7 f eF, 20″d.
73 46.4 29 30 25 d eF, 15″d.
74 49.8 29 22 46 d eeF, 20″d.
75 51.6 29 22 53 e eeF, 10″d.
76 52.4 29 22 34 e eeF, 15″d.
77 52.9 29 43 59 e eeF, 20″d.
78 53.6 28 59 39 e F, 35″d.
79 54.5 29 26 1 d eeF, 20″d.
80 54.7 29 23 5 e eeF, 20″d.
81 55.1 29 21 50 e eF, 15″d.
82 56.7 29 26 22 e eeF, 15″d, E50°.
83 56.9 29 34 40 e eF, 15″d.
84 57.5 29 16 59 e eF, double nebula,
nuc. 4″ apart.
85 57.6 29 8 7 e eF, 30″d.
86 57.7 29 27 19 h₀ eeF, E140°, 15″×5″.
87 11 4 0.8 29 17 51 e eeF, 10″d.
88 1.0 28 56 28 e eeF, 20″d.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
89 1.4 29 22 15 e eF, 15″d.
90 1.4 29 39 5 e eeF, 15″d.
91 1.8 28 57 21 e vF, 30″d.
92 3.4 29 27 26 e eF, 10″d.
93 3.7 29 29 10 e eeF, 20″d.
94 2.7 29 20 17 e vF, 20″d.
95 3.8 29 2 9 e eeF, iR.
96 4.4 29 27 33 e eF, 10″d.
97 5.7 29 28 23 e eeF, 15″d, faint extensions.
98 5.8 30 14 51 e eF, st.
99 6.9 29 22 50 e eF, 15″d.
100 7.6 28 56 51 h₀ eeF, E25°, 30″×10″.
101 9.4 29 14 23 e eeF, 15″d.
102 9.9 29 29 29 d eeF, 10″d.
103 10.0 28 53 55 e? eeF, faint extensions
60″×40″?
104 10.1 30 0 27 d eF, 30″d.
105 10.6 29 8 48 g₀ eF, E145°, spiral, 40″×20″.
106 12.8 29 28 58 h eeeF, 20″×10″.
107 13.4 29 23 15 e eeF, 15″d.
108 13.5 29 21 19 g₀ eeF, E125°, 25″×15″.
109 13.8 29 47 14 d eeF, 20″d.
110 14.2 30 0 57 k eF, E40°, 34″×20″.
111 14.4 29 25 24 e eF, 15″d.
112 15.6 29 29 36 d eeeF, 10″d.
113 18.6 28 55 56 e eeF, 15″d.
114 20.2 28 53 6 f eeF, 20″d.
115 22.8 28 54 6 e eeF, 20″d.
116 27.9 29 23 25 f eF, 35″d.
117 27.9 29 26 40 e? eeF, 60″×40″, spiral?
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
118 28.4 29 22 31 e eF, 45″d.
119 28.6 29 21 58 d eeF, 15″d.
120 28.6 29 25 18 e eeF, 10″d.
121 30.2 29 37 42 e eeF, 15″d.
122 32.0 29 25 37 d eeF, 15″d.
123 34.4 29 21 33 e eF, 20″d.
124 34.9 29 42 1 e eF, 20″d.
125 35.5 29 12 10 e eeF, 10″d.
126 36.0 29 21 0 e eF, E60°, 20″×15″.
127 37.0 29 27 7 d eeeF, 15″d.
128 38.5 28 56 22 e eF, st.
129 39.4 29 24 33 f vF, 25″d.
130 40.2 29 12 57 e eeF, 15″d.
131 41.8 29 27 40 g eeF, E95°, 20″ × 10″.
132 46.8 29 19 18 g eeF, 30″ × 15″.
133 47.9 29 31 9 d eeF, 10″d.
134 49.3 29 26 1 f eF, 15″d.
135 49.9 29 29 19 e eeF, 10″d.
136 49.9 29 14 45 e eeF, 15″d.
137 50.5 29 25 27 e eF, 30″d.
138 51.5 29 22 55 e eF, 10″d.
139 52.7 29 23 21 e eF, 10″d.
140 54.1 29 29 57 e eeF, 15″d.
141 11 5 3.0 28 56 43 e vF, 30″d.
142 4.7 29 16 36 e eF, 15″d.
143 6.8 29 15 53 e eeF, 20″d.
144 7.6 28 53 4 d eeF, 15″d.
145 11.6 29 38 5 e eeF, 20″d.
146 12.3 29 10 1 d eF, 20″d.
147 13.5 30 9 30 d eF, 20″d.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
148 14.4 30 6 28 e eF, 20″d.
149 14.7 29 20 38 w eF, 25″d, spiral.
150 15.6 29 8 19 d eeeF, 15″d.
151 17.1 29 29 16 e eF, 20″d.
152 19.4 29 10 52 g vF, E40°, 50″ × 20″.
153 34.3 29 25 10 d eeF, 30″d.
154 35.5 29 15 0 e eeF, 30″d.
155 43.6 28 57 24 e eF, 40″d.
156 49.2 28 42 34 f eF, st.
157 51.3 28 43 12 e eeF, 30″d.
158 59.6 28 57 38 e eeF, 30″d.
159 11 6 6.9 28 44 55 d eeF, 30″d.
160 9.7 29 29 30 d eeeF, 20″d.
161 10.6 28 40 46 e eF, 30″d.
162 11.8 29 4 8 f vF, st.
163 12.8 30 11 16 e eeF, 10″d.
164 17.5 29 25 47 e eF, 15″d.
165 23.2 28 43 55 f eeF, 20″d.
166 24.9 28 39 40 e eeF, 30″d.
167 27.8 28 41 26 e eeF, 30″d.
168 29.0 28 56 22 e eeF, 20″d.
169 40.9 29 20 27 d eeeF, 20″d.
170 37.7 28 33 23 d eeeF, 15″d.
171 42.7 29 37 59 e eeF, 20″d.
172 44.2 29 5 13 d eeeF, 15″d.
173 50.6 29 18 31 e eeF, 20″d.
174 11 7 11.1 28 32 54 d eeF, 20″d.
175 14.9 30 14 45 e eF, 20″d.
176 19.2 29 18 25 h eeeF, 30″×10″.
177 27.1 29 6 26 f eF, 20″d.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
178 32.9 28 51 30 e eF, 30″d.
TABLE XII
Field IV of Nebulae [10]
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
1 13ᴴ 32ᵐ 33.0ˢ +56°18′28″ e F, eS, *15m10″n.
2 13 33 0.4 56 49 46 e eeF, pS.
3 16.0 55 49 23 e eF, S.
4 41.7 57 9 1 e eF, S.
5 55.6 56 5 4 e vF, eS.
6 56.9 56 6 15 e eF, S.
7 13 34 9.1 55 50 46 e eeF, eS.
8 11.3 56 32 8 f eF, eS.
9 25.9 56 29 14 f eF, eS.
10 56.6 56 42 36 e eF, vS.
11 57.7 57 0 46 f eF, vS.
12 13 35 4.9 56 45 21 h eeF, S.
13 49.8 56 13 38 h vF, S.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
14 52.0 56 52 58 e eF, cS.
15 53.1 56 3 25 e eeF, eS.
16 13 36 20.1 55 50 25 e eeF, eS.
17 29.1 56 51 25 e eF, S.
18 33.1 55 49 59 e eeF, eS.
19 33.2 56 43 54 f eF, eS.
20 38.6 55 46 18 e eeF, eS.
21 39.0 56 18 33 h F, 30″l.
22 41.0 56 12 2 d eeF, S.
23 43.7 56 42 11 e eeF, S, *15m10″s.
24 46.2 56 48 12 e eF, cL.
25 49.7 56 41 26 f eF, S.
26 53.6 56 48 57 e eeF, eS.
27 55.7 56 27 19 h eeF, S.
28 56.1 56 40 17 e eeF, S.
29 13 37 7.2 56 4 29 f vF, S.
30 11.6 55 46 36 e eeF, eS.
31 19.0 56 24 54 e eF, S.
32 20.2 56 26 51 f eeF, vS.
33 35.5 57 7 6 e eF, cS.
34 46.0 56 5 6 f eeF, S.
35 54.0 56 10 12 h eeF, S.
36 58.2 56 9 31 h eeF, S.
37 13 38 4.3 56 7 32 f eeF, S.
38 9.8 56 7 11 f eeF, eS.
39 15.8 56 13 9 e eeF, eS.
40 17.1 56 13 57 f eF, vS.
41 29.1 56 16 49 e eF, S.
42 35.2 56 15 5 h eF, vS.
43 35.4 56 13 55 h eeF, eS.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
44 37.3 56 14 41 f eF, vS.
45 47.3 56 41 19 e eeF, cS.
46 52.8 55 35 23 e eeF, eS.
47 56.4 56 12 58 f eF, vS.
48 13 39 6.9 56 15 45 e eeF, eS.
49 7.9 56 16 31 h eF, vS.
50 8.1 56 5 45 f vF, S.
51 9.2 56 11 45 e eeF, eS.
52 9.4 55 56 14 e eeF, eS.
53 13.3 56 16 32 f eeF, vS.
54 17.6 56 10 33 e eeF, eS.
55 19.8 56 10 50 e eeF, eS.
56 23.0 56 11 40 e eF, eS.
57 25.1 56 16 43 e eeF, eS.
58 30.3 56 26 49 f eF, eS.
59 31.6 56 20 3 e eeF, S.
60 45.1 56 29 5 f eF, vS.
61 45.7 56 34 46 e eeF, S.
62 54.2 56 15 18 e eeF, eS.
63 13 40 3.2 56 37 22 e eeF, eS.
64 5.9 56 30 56 e eeF, eS.
65 5.9 56 30 29 h eeF, 30″l.
66 27.2 56 6 27 e eeF, vS.
67 13 41 27.2 56 20 38 e eF, 60″d.
68 38.8 55 47 15 e eF, eS.
69 47.4 55 44 54 f eF, vS.
70 13 42 40.2 56 15 54 e eeF, S.
TABLE XIII
Field V of Nebulae
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
1 14ᴴ 53ᵐ 52.5ˢ +23°10′16″ e eF, S, R.
2 54.5 23 57 39 e vF, R, 20″d, *18m40″nf.
3 14 54 56.2 23 53 37 g eF, S, m3. *16m1′.np.
4 58.1 23 16 56 e vF, pS, iR.
5 14 55 6.7 23 24 32 f eF, S.
6 16.2 24 5 30 f F, S, *17m30″n.
7 31.4 24 6 9 w F, 30″d. Spiral.
8 35.9 23 58 27 g vF, mE, 40″l, bet. 2*.
9 37.3 24 12 53 e eF, eS.
10 14 56 13.7 23 52 21 g F, E, spiral?
11 17.7 24 2 30 g F, E180°.
12 26.3 24 0 51 h₀ vF, S, iR.
13 27.0 24 9 28 g F, vS, E.
14 28.6 23 23 8 e vF, S, R, 15″d, no nuc.
15 30.0 23 54 53 e vF, vS, R.
16 32.6 24 2 47 f eF, vS.
17 46.4 24 3 54 e eF, S, iR.
18 47.8 24 36 4 e vF, S, iR.
19 51.2 23 40 4 e vF, vS.
20 56.0 23 51 10 e eF, vS, R.
21 58.7 23 49 12 f eF, vS, R.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
22 58.7 23 50 14 e eF, eS, R.
23 59.0 23 51 41 g eF, S, IE.
24 14 57 4.3 23 51 51 e eF, S.
25 4.3 23 52 8 f eF, E.
26 6.1 24 5 56 f F, bet. 2*14, 15m.
27 8.4 23 47 22 g eF, cS, iR.
28 8.9 24 16 59 e eF, S.
29 10.3 23 50 31 e eF, S.
30 11.3 23 46 44 e eF, S.
31 11.8 23 49 57 e eF, S.
32 13.6 23 53 2 h eF, S.
33 18.8 23 44 22 g eF, S.
34 24.1 23 42 42 e eF, cS, iR.
35 24.3 24 4 40 e eF, S, iR.
36 26.8 23 45 2 e eF, vS ,iR.
37 35.9 24 6 37 e eF, S.
38 41.7 24 35 7 f eF, S.
39 43.0 23 24 38 e vF, R, 30″d, no nuc.
40 51.7 24 0 48 g eF, vS, Δ with 2*14 and 16m.
41 14 58 0.6 23 18 4 c vF, 25″d, spiral?
42 6.8 23 11 21 g F, cL, mE180°, 80″×15″.
43 18.5 23 26 30 g eF, S, 20″d.
44 19.8 23 21 55 f vF, R? 60″d.
45 25.9 23 25 35 e eF, S, R, 20″d.
46 48.4 23 40 57 g eF, cS, mE.
47 54.7 23 54 12 e F, mE 180°.
48 14 59 56.8 24 10 32 e vF, S, iR, bM.
49 15 0 7.2 23 52 11 e eF, S, iR.
I.C.
4526 14 57 5.9 23 50 31 e pB, R, 18″d.
4532 59 21.7 23 44 43 e pB, S, E.
TABLE XIV
Field VI of Nebulae
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
1 17ᴴ 8ᵐ 16.7ˢ +44° 5′35″ f vF, vS, *13m, 1′f.
2 29.9 43 26 6 f vF, vS, st.
3 35.2 43 23 8 g eF, E 60°, *13m40″sp.
4 52.6 42 57 44 f F, S, st.
5 17 9 2.6 44 18 28 e vF, vS, *16m, 40″s.
6 14.2 44 16 11 e eF, S, *16m, 40″f.
7 17.5 43 50 51 f vF, sharp nuc. 30″d.
8 33.2 43 2 38 e F, pS, *17m, 1′n.
9 35.1 44 2 54 e F, vS, *15m, 30″f.
10 41.1 43 38 39 g₀ pF, S, mE, 60°*14m, 30″p.
11 53.8 43 52 2 e vF, vS, *17m, 40″n.
12 17 10 3.4 44 12 35 f eF, eS, *16m, 30″n.
13 23.3 43 49 32 e vF, vS, bet. 2 vf*.
14 25.5 43 43 7 f vF, vS.
15 29.1 43 44 48 e vF, vS.
16 33.0 44 4 43 g vF, S.
17 37.7 44 5 32 e eF, vS.
18 39.0 43 42 38 g vF, eS, *16m, 40″sf.
19 40.2 44 5 20 h eF, vS.
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
20 46.7 43 51 14 f vF, vS, *16m, 40″sf.
21 52.8 43 33 9 f vF, S, *16m, 40″sf.
22 55.7 44 4 8 g F, cE 70°, *14m, 40″n.
23 17 11 16.3 43 10 57 f vF, S.
24 25.9 43 25 48 f pF, S, *16m, 40″f.
25 33.9 43 47 21 g vF, vs, cE 160°, *15m, 40″np.
26 36.7 43 42 51 h₀ vF, S, cE 120°, faint nuc.
27 43.0 43 53 35 g₀ pF, S, cE 20°, *14m, 1.5′np.
28 45.7 43 55 42 f F, vS, *15m, 40″nf.
29 48.6 43 58 50 e vF, S *13m, 1.5′n.
30 57.1 44 8 50 e eF, es.
31 57.8 44 8 6 e eF, S.
32 57.9 43 44 57 e vF, vS, *15m, 30″f.
33 17 12 13.3 44 2 16 e F, eS, *12m, 1′n.
34 26.2 44 12 21 e F, eS.
35 37.2 44 12 12 e F, eS, Δ with 2*12m.
36 38.4 43 28 52 f pF, vS, *1.5′s.
37 40.9 43 54 40 h₀ eF, cE 150°, no nuc.
38 44.9 43 45 22 e vF, vS, Δ with 2*16m.
39 50.6 43 39 48 f vF, eS, Δ with 2 f*.
40 51.0 43 48 16 e vF, vS, *16m, 40″nf.
41 17 13 4.9 43 36 37 e eF, vS, *15m, 20″s.
42 27.2 43 40 39 e vF, vS.
43 39.2 43 44 19 e vF, S.
I.C.
4645 17 10 53.0 +43°14′40″ e vF, pS, Δ with 2 faint*.
TABLE XV
Field VII of Nebulae
(1875.0)
No. Class Description
α δ
1 23ᴴ 10ᵐ 25.7ˢ +8°13′28″ f st. 14m.
2 23 11 19.4 7 34 13 e F, S, *17m30″s.
3 39.3 7 45 26 d vF, R, no nuc., 16m45″ np.
4 47.3 7 3 55 f eF, S, R, no nuc.
5 23 12 23.1 7 18 20 c vF, st. nuc. with ring 45″d.
6 42.2 6 45 7 d eF, S, R, no nuc.
7 51.1 7 2 10 q F, 1bM, mE100°, 100, ×20″.
8 23 13 17.2 7 24 12 h₀ vF, S, 1E50°*14m30″p.
9 19.4 7 34 51 q F, sharp nuc., mE70°, 80″×20″.
10 29.9 7 31 15 f F, S, E150°.
11 33.6 8 6 51 d eF, pS, R.
12 35.4 7 52 39 g pF, bM, mE150° 40″l.
13 41.6 7 32 2 g eF, vS.
14 41.6 7 18 13 e vF, vS, Δ2 faint *.
15 49.1 7 2 16 e vF, S, Δ2 faint *.
16 52.7 7 14 52 h F, sharp nuc. vmE20°90″×15″.
17 56.6 7 19 16 e eF, pL, no nuc.
18 23 14 2.4 6 51 8 f F, S, R, *14m90″n.
19 2.9 7 38 55 f F, S, R, bM.
20 18.4 7 42 40 f F, S, bM.
21 24.4 7 45 35 e eF, vS, *16m30″s.