D E P E D WA S H IN SCHOOLS

DEPED WINS MONITORING UPDATES

VONERICH B. BERBA, RN, LPT
EDUCATION PROGRAM SPECIALIST II/ NATIONAL WINS COORDINATOR
BUREAU OF LEARNER SUPPORT SERVICES –SCHOOL HEALTH DIVISION

VALIDATION OF THE C ANDIDATES FOR THE S EAL OF EXCELLENCE (SOE)

OF THE WASH IN S CHOOLS P ROGRAM PER DEP E D MEMORANDUM
194, S . 2018
 OUTLINE

1. Three-Star Approach: A Stepwise Approach

2. WinS Monitoring Overview

3. Participation Rate

4. Crucial Indicators and Three-Star Ratings

5. WinS Dashboard

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 2
 DEPED ORDER NO. 10, S. 2016
POLICY AND GUIDELINES FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE
WASH IN SCHOOLS (WINS) PROGRAM

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 THE THREE-STAR APPROACH: INCREMENTAL PROGRESS FOR WASH IN
SCHOOLS

Three star

Two star

No star
One star

School management Incremental Meeting national

processes routines Improvements standards

• What schools can • What can be • School facilities and

start with achieved with systems upgraded to
immediately using mobilization of local meet national
resources available government and standards 4
to the school community
resources

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 INDICATORS OF THE STANDARDS AND THE THREE  APPROACH

 The 40 Standards are translated to operational indicators that are laid out in a 3-level
rubrics
 Step-wise approach: Three levels are milestones for incremental achievement towards
national standards

GUIDE   
W.1-a. Safe drinking W.1-b. Safe drinking W.1-c. Safe drinking
Constant: Drinking water comes from water is available in the water is provided for
Water
children who bring school but supply is not free all children in
Variable: Accountable their own drinking regular. the school at all5
for the drinking water times
water

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 THREE  APPROACH AS AN INTEGRATED SYSTEM SERVES AS:

1. A Quality Assurance mechanism of a regular school program, wherein

all schools can assess their WinS implementation to ensure that the
enablers for learning are in place and functional
2. A Monitoring scheme, to provide the information and evidence for
relevant management systems (e.g. Quality Assurance; Planning and
Budgeting; Technical Assistance, Performance management). The
Monitoring reports of schools serve as basis for technical assistance of
the Schools Division Office. These form part of the agenda for technical
assistance and Schools’ Continuous Improvement Projects
3. A Recognition system, that puts premium to both the improvement
efforts of the school community and on the results of the efforts
themselves. 6

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 Auto-generated 3-Star Report for Schools

Indicators are
color coded to
indicate Star
rating
Blue – 3 Stars
Green – 2 Stars
Yellow – 1 Star
Red – 0 Star

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Auto-generated 3-Star Report for Schools

✓ means Overall rating

the 2-star is average
criteria has score of all
been met indicators

Score based
on star
rating
8

Click to
access 3-Star
Reports
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
ONLINE TRANSPARENCY: THE WINS DASHBOARD

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 RECOGNITION
RECOGNITION
a. Elevated the implementation to a higher level. For improving, the school will be given a
Citation of Appreciation as signed by Schools Division Superintendent
b. Reached the desired Advanced Level of WinS Implementation (3 – Star Level). For
being able to fully observe national standards, the school will be given a Recognition
Award duly signed by the DepED Regional Director
c. Successfully maintained an Advanced Level of WinS Implementation (3 – Star Level)
for 3 straight years, the school will cited for excellence and be given the Seal of
Excellence issued by the CO as signed by the Director of the BLSS in behalf of the
Secretary.

10

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 THREE  APPROACH INSTITUTIONALIZATION AND SCALE-UP

The roles and responsibilities of the SDO and RO in the WinS

Policy are consistent with their own roles and function wherein:
• Schools implement the program;
• Schools Division Offices perform WinS Program Management,
Monitoring, and Technical Assistance to schools; and
• Regional Offices does quality assurance and performance
recognition.

These roles are guided and driven by the TSA as an integrated

quality assurance, monitoring, and performance recognition
system that is embedded in management processes of the
respective levels, as mandated under the Implementing
Guidelines to the WinS Policy (DM 194 s. 2018)

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 THREE STAR APPROACH FOR WINS Recognition
IMPLEMENTATION: STEPS  For Effort / improvement:
Citation of Appreciation
Validation:  Recognition for 3schools
 Seal of Excellence for 3 years
SDO looks closely
at 3schools Translating Results
 Documents review into Actions
 Visits and
Self-Assessment: School Level:
observations  Report to School Stakeholders
 Check 5 crucial WinS  SIP, AIP and APP
indicators  Continuous Improvement Project (CI
 Complete the Project)
 Plan adjustment of the WinS Program
Monitoring Form  Evidence for the SBM Assessment
Preparation:
 Review the results
 Gather School SDO Level:
WinS TWG  Technical Assistance Plan of the ESs
 Orient or review of for each school
the indicators and  M&E Report of the SDO
 Evidence for the SBM Assessment
3 steps  DEDP , AIP and APP

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 WASH IN SCHOOLS​ (WINS)
MONITORING OVERVIEW

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 13
 WINS MONITORING OVERVIEW

DepEd WASH in Schools (WinS)

Monitoring
• Piloted in 2016-2017 and implemented
nationwide in 2018 after the issuance of
implementing guidelines for the use of
digitalized incentive-based monitoring
for WinS (DM 194, 2018)

• Adopted Three-Star Approach as

stepwise approach to reach the national
WinS standards.

• Currently in 4th year of implementation

(Done annually; baseline data collection
was conducted in SY 2017-18)

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 14
THE THREE-STAR APPROACH: AS BASE FOR WINS
MONITORING SYSTEM

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 15
 OVERALL PARTICIPATION

Figure 1. Schools Participation in WinS Monitoring, 2017/18  The proportion of schools

100
to 2021/22 participating in the WinS
95 monitoring has increased by
93.0 1/3 over the monitoring
90 period and is now over 90%
for all school levels
85
Percent (%)

80

75
65.6
70

65

60

55

Elementary Secondary All schools

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 16
 PARTICIPATION BY REGION

Participation rates by Region, SY 2021/22

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 17
 COMPLIANCE TO 5 CRUCIAL INDICATORS

 More schools reported

97.2 97.6 96.3
available gender-
100.0 95.4
segregated toilets in the
90.0
80.2 most recent monitoring.
80.0 74.7
68.3
70.0 65.5
61.5 59.8
58.6
60.0 56.8
 The percentage of
50.9
49.0
50.0 44.1 schools with available
40.0 33.6
37.4
group handwashing
30.0 26.6 facility and soap has
20.0 increased to about two-
10.0 thirds (68.3%) in SY
0.0 2020/21 from only a third
Safe Drinking Gender Group Daily Group Access to at baseline.
Water Segregated Handwashing Handwashing Sanitary pads
Toilets Facility with Activities
Soap

SY 2017/18 SY 2018/19 SY 2019/20 SY 2020/21

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 18
 OVER-ALL THREE STAR RATINGS

100% 6.0 0.1 1.1 2.4 3.9

2.9 13.9
90% 19.1
21.2
3.9
80%
5.0
4.2
70%
60%
50%
90.9
40% 81.2
73.5 70.7
30%
20%
10%
0%
SY 2017/18 SY 2018/19 SY 2019/20 SY 2020/21
No Star 1 Star 2 Stars 3 Stars

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 19
 WINS THEMATIC AREAS

100%

90%

80%

70%

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
2017 2018 2019 2020 2017 2018 2019 2020 2017 2018 2019 2020 2017 2018 2019 2020 2017 2018 2019 2020
Water Sanitation Hygiene Deworming Health Education
3 Stars 7.4 10.5 12.2 13.5 0.4 1.4 2.6 4.1 0.2 0.9 2.0 3.6 70.1 54.0 59.2 49.1 22.6 34.8 41.0 48.8
2 Stars 40.5 47.2 47.5 47.8 14.4 24.5 29.0 32.1 3.6 12.0 16.5 19.1 7.1 7.0 8.0 5.8 63.0 56.5 53.1 47.0
1 Star 37.3 32.2 30.9 28.4 30.5 28.7 28.0 27.4 6.2 8.4 10.4 9.4 9.1 12.3 12.7 8.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3
No Star 14.8 10.1 9.5 10.3 54.7 45.5 40.4 36.5 89.9 78.7 71.1 67.9 13.7 26.7 20.2 36.9 14.0 8.3 5.6 3.9

No Star 1 Star 2 Stars 3 Stars

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 20
 WINS MONITORING DASHBOARD

WinS Monitoring Dashboard

• DepEd moves to Power BI (Business Intelligence) as a
tool for online data visualization and sharing of data.

• New version: Additional features incorporating

feedback from the Regional/SDO focals.
• Easier selection
• Inclusion of selected school-level data

• Contents:
• Participation Rate
• Crucial Indicators
• Five Major Thematic areas (water, sanitation,
hygiene, deworming & health education)
• Overall Three-Star Rating
• 17 Specific WinS Scoring points Indicators
• Infection Prevention & Control parameters --
NEW

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 21
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT

• WinS Monitoring data

shows that the increase in
percentage of schools
reaching star levels was
significantly higher in
schools that participated
in the MOOC than in
schools that did not
participate.

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 22
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
 WINS MONITORING DASHBOARD

National Participation Rate by WinS Overall Star ratings by

Region in the dashboard Region
(SY 2020/21) (SY 2020/21)

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 24
 LGU DASHBOARD

D E P A R TM E N T O F E D U CA TI O N 25
Access to WinS Dashboard Links and WinS Monitoring Report

WinS Dashboard Links:

 SY 2017/18 - https://bit.ly/35dWElA
 SY 2018/19 - https://bit.ly/2XaXKdj
 SY 2019/20 - https://bit.ly/38cJ4AC

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 26
Thank you!

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION