Symmetric Measures

Asymptotic Approximate
a b
Value Standard Error Approximate T Significance
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .316 .068
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .333 .172 1.871 .072c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .333 .172 1.871 .072c
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.

Table 1. Correlation between Gender and Type of Student

Variables Sig. Value Interpretation Decision To HO

Contingency
Coefficient
1.Gender .316 0.68 Not Significant Accept
2.Type of
Students

Table 1 displays the connection between gender and student type based on a sample size of 30. The table
suggests that there is no association between these factors (correlation coefficient, r = 0.316, p = 0.068,
which is greater than 0.05). Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis.

Symmetric Measures
Asymptotic Approximate
a b
Value Standard Error Approximate T Significance
Interval by Interval Pearson's R .190 .172 1.024 .315c
Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .166 .179 .890 .381c
N of Valid Cases 30
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
c. Based on normal approximation.
Table 2. Correlation between Gender and Grade in Basic Statistics
Variables Sig. Value Interpretation Decision To HO
Eta
Correlation
1.Gender .745 0.68 Not Significant Accept
2.Grade in
Statistic

α = 0.05 Level of Significance

Table 2 displays the connection between gender and basic statistics grade based on a sample size of 30.
The table suggests that there is no association between these factors (Eta correlation, r = 0.745, p = 0.373,
which is greater than 0.05). Therefore, we accept the null hypothesis.

Correlations
bs bp
bs Pearson Correlation 1 .390*
Sig. (2-tailed) .033
N 30 30
*
bp Pearson Correlation .390 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .033
N 30 30
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 3. Correlation between Grade in Basic Statistics and Grade in Basic Pharmacology
Variables Sig. Value Interpretation Decision To HO
Eta
Correlation
Grade in Basic .390 .033 Significant Reject
Statistics *
Grade in Basic
Pharmacology

α = 0.05 Level of Significance

Table 3 presents the relationship between grades in basic statistics and basic pharmacology, with data
collected from a sample of 30 individuals. The table indicates that there is indeed an association between
these two factors (Pearson r, r = 0.390, p = 0.033, which is below the 0.05 significance level). As a result,
we reject the null hypothesis.