You are on page 1of 21

This article was downloaded by: [Johann Christian Senckenberg]

On: 11 September 2014, At: 10:06


Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,
37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods


Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsta20

On some alternative procedures using ranks for the


analysis of experimental designs
a b
W.J. Conover & R.L. Iman
a
Texas Tech University
b
Sandia Laboratories
Published online: 27 Jun 2007.

To cite this article: W.J. Conover & R.L. Iman (1976) On some alternative procedures using ranks for the analysis of
experimental designs, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 5:14, 1349-1368, DOI: 10.1080/03610927608827447

To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03610927608827447

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE

Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the
publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations
or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any
opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the
views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be
independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses,
actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever
caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.

This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic
reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any
form to anyone is expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Texas Tech U a i v e r s i t y
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

! 3 e a a s i y s l s of d a t a h 3 e ~ e r L x z ' ; & k ~ i 9 . si s C ~ P B
?tm-

pered Fsg %hi? Lark of icore tb8n one g r o c e & m available ,Lor t;le
t h a t ?meedwe i s based on sseuzqciona
analjtsis, e s g e c l a i l y *en
vhich do n o t a?'ply Fn t h e situation a t hand. In tthis paper t w o
c l a s a e s of a l t e r n a t i v e ?rocedures arc d i s c w e e d and cmpa?ed.
Cne is t h e c r l i g c d rrinks p r o c d ~ - e v t i c h Z r s t s t m d a r d i z e n the
h t e by suk1-sc%in~;
sr. a ? ? r q x i a t e e s t i z a t e of l o c a t i o a , t h e n
rzplaraa t h e d a t a w i t h r&s, and 5nalj:7 uses en a p ~ ) m ? r f a t e
t e s t s t a t i s t i c vklcf; baa aaysrptoticall'jr a chi-eqaert distribution.
?3e second procedure i s :kc raak trsnsforzl which re?lacas
of t h e dsts vi%ht h e raqks: an& then exploys t h e ustlal para-
m e t r i c r e t h o & , bu; com>ucled on t h e ranks i n s t e a d of t h e data.
Same Monte Carlo s i z d l a t i o n s f o r a test of h t e r a c t i o n in s two
vay layout v'ith ~ p l i c a t i o tenable t h e robustness and pvgr Of

C o p y n a t Q !976 av Marcel D e k ~ e r ,inc. .All Righis R a s e r ~ e o , Ne:ther this wori; nor any Pa::
mav oereproouceo o r t r m s m l n c d :n sny form or 3v any means. e i e c r r o n ~ cor mcchanlcai, rnciudlng
pnotocopying, mic:o:um;lg. 2nd r x n r d m g , or ay anv l n i o r m a u o n stor3gc and rerrleval sysrcm.
.w,rhoui ptriiiijs~onin AT:::^.; !TOP? :he pun!sner
1. :.x$13?3U~?!;
--
J>;SC::T? SC;~CP~I'_= researcn relies . : e e ?--J ,.-
' - - ~ - y o ~:.?c ~ 3 3 -

-L--E?~?
--1- e ~ t r h x z z ,'i.".t? rr."--?retet~sr:,?I" ;he r c s q L s s LPy= :sn-
t r o x e d eqer:zeots 3L.m SelenCs 3: :ie sva.ilsbil;t:,- 3 f a a : p m
??Late s t a t l s t i s L = e + - x d s . Sore 9 3 t h e s i q l e r e ~ e ~ k e c : d
dcs>g~
s v 2 e r . t l ; - = a t 5:; m:i m e ( s I sever& a??ropr:a=e =etaas,
botn p c t u e t r i c and. m n p a r a c e t r i c . Sone o i t h e rsore c s q h c a t e d
&esLq.r?s w- be n = e f z ~ b & ; ~ s i a q? ~ - & ~ e : y i c xc$he&, vn;:g
o t h e r desi,-s nave oniy s o c r c x h a t e s t a t i s t r e d methods a v a i l a b l e .
.%at 5 t a Z i s t i c d s e t k o i s a z t l e s s chin y r f z c $ :or one reason o r
another. :ioopa.maetrrc nezhods suZer. iror l a c x of a-vailanilit:;
f o r n o s t of the experil=eni,ai desims In corrcon u s a p , and -he=
-..
~ & e iair w a i l a j i a appee- quize o n e n t o o e cuszoc nede l o t
A%.
:key
-- ------ ..
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

-I--
~ i - i ~ . ~?~-s_zarr:r
~ g z ~ l;l,er,k& sr r_ce ~ ~ h kfl?
i i ~
57%+'7d:lzc-t

f o r a ' a d s .nrr%ety s l desi,%s, but :heir or


vabi3Lt.j. 3.e~en.4~ 3 3ec
of m s m z t i o n s v h ~ c k(t-P gel-m set a d usnn!ly ima-ed.
W L . J >~ -U C ~ & L~~~ s e a r cih , aeen
P---.
~ de70;eB TO snmrq x s t ?zr~aus

pwa.metric ~ r o c a c i u e s are rabust (LZ 2 e - w of ?jpe Z ertvjr) i ~ n d e r


d i f i e r e ~ tconcE%ions. Boveoer, it i s not as widely r e a l i z e d t k a z
robustness i n t h e above sense i s onijr half o? t h e a r o b i m w-d +-hat
v f o l a t i o n of t h e ass.;sp",ons cm a130 r e s u l t i n a l o s s of ?owe?,
I3 t h e s e c i r c u w t a n c e s rioc?az%zetr',c proce&sres, when a v a i l a b l e ,
sametimes have ecnsiderabLy l o r e y v e r &7d :herefore shoulc! be
used.
Another v i d e s ~ r e s daisconce?tior. i s t h a t a X nnn?ar?aetric
procedures are, i a s o ?act0 , yobust , 'I?-fuallg a l l nonparaaef r i c
~ m c t d ~ fe osr e q x n m e z a l designs enploy a s - p p t o t i e d L s t r i b x t i o n s
instead of e x a m f i s z r i b u t i o n s f o r t h e t e s t s t a t i s t i c s , and Y%--

t u u y all of t h e n &e some ass-tims about t h e m a e l vhich


may o r may not be s a t i s f i e d . 3 e r e i o r e 30th robustness and ?over
should be considered vhen cmparfnq ?arezeClric and nonpa-azetric
procedures. %e Cangemus .-@A, t h a t c o n p a r m e t r i c p m ~ t d w z s
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

definite.
Since (1.3~
is ~ e w t e n t - d ; S rmk (a-1 1, it i s easy t o shov,
i d)
u s b g t h e abooe ~ s u l t s t, h a t ( Z a - 1
Ja) x

tent, r i t h rslzk ( a-1) ('z-1).


Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

batad e m r t e r s . X t h t h e s e two e s s u ~ p t i o n s , and c ~ c c s s i o n a l l j .


a d d i t i o n a l ones, s t a t i s t i c a l methods h e m Seen develooed ?or 11~1y
e q e r h c n t a l d e s i p s , ezd =st of t h e s e zethods have sood proper-
t i e s such as b e i ~ glikeLi;?oorl r a t i s tes:s. 3m.y of chese metnods

b u t i o n of t h e t e s t statistic a s r o a c h e s sac p r e s c r i b e d d i a t r i -
b u t i o n , eve2 thou* t h e e r r o r :ens aigkt be nonncrm.1. ??he
methods w M c b -e e s m t o t i e a i l y n o n p a n a e t r i c t e c d t o be t h e saxe

F o r p q o s e s of coxparinq t h e v a r i o u s nethods, ve have s e l e c -


t e d aa ou= veiiicle of comparison t h e t e s t f o r i n t e - = t i o n in the
two 'isy l ~ y o u td t h rqlication. The line&- ~ ~ d aes s im e d i n t h e
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

*ere t h e dot

- --"
C s t r i b u t i o n wtth n o n c e n t r n l i t y l a m e t e r X = nu' ( 9 ' 9 ) u / 2 and
(a-l)(b-i) d o p e s o f freedom Fi a d or*
--
if n X ' Y is i d e m o t e n t
3 u t t h i s l a t t e ~condition i s e e s i l y shovn t c
of rank is-l)(b-1).

nr-
s
-
E isi i d~
~ tegt of
t z p ?~ (ab-1) (n-1) and the quad,zatie i o n

--
(E Y ) ' ( E
..-? ) / a
2
-
l
= 2
IJ
a
1
b
z
n
z cfiJk-YiJ*-Y*.k+Y ...l2
i=l J=l k = l
(3.3)

h a the central chi-squa=e 6 i s t r i S u t i e n v i t h (ab-l)(n-1) depes


Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

able to expand upon a method s h a t vcrks w e l l i n s i q i e r nodela.


One such aec&od is t h e Flilcoxon signed-?a& t e s t I z use v t t h
paired obserrstions, or equivaleatl;r, v i t Z a t v o - w a y lajrout vhiffi
has two t r c a t x n t s and several ( a ) blocks. Qthough not aatad2.y
presented i n t h i s w a y , the Kilccxon sig3ed-rmk test msy be con-
sidered aa foUcus. first lta12q'' the obscnatiaos w i t h i s eaeh
*First t r a c s i o m t h e vector 'l a? observations t o t h e v e c t o t
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

-
ss i n ( 3 . 2 ) . vhere N i s t h e s m e as before. Assme t h e l i n e a r
m d c l (3.1) t o holc! as before, tiut aake no r 3 s t r i b u t i s r . C 3 s s - a y
9 -"
abk 1
t i o n s on t h e 3exce?t t h a t t h e vectors (P 1-124 D
idk
art nnrt'daily indegendest, x = l , . ..
,n, and have s d i s t r i j u t i s n
?.niction w h i & is s p e f r i c Fn i t s a r q u ~ o n t s . %e-. t h e vectors
of r e s i d u d s [Z,, Z+i=,.. .,Z abk ) mutually independent, k=l,
...,n, and t h e i r c m o n O i s t r i b c t i o n fimczion i s s m e t r i c i n izs
arspnents rrnder t h e c u l l m o c n e s i s . ?.us d p e r m i t a t i o n s oi
t h e ranks sssi3r.ed t o ? e p l i c a t i o n k s r e equally l i k e l y . .U.eiLea and
Sez (1969) consider t h e c o n d i t i o n a l dlrrcribution o? (4.2), given
the con,CLwatioc o f r a n k s in raws, coltanns, snd r e p l i c a t i o n s ,
d e r t h e nul; h y p x i e s l s sod nonce~crslc . k i - ~ q ; ~ ~~ ra d + 2=?ie L i , e r -
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

as does the F-test.


5. TE3 ?&?K 3.WSFOF.Y
TC,e i d e a of t h e xnk t r p n s f o m i s s i q l e . Ii then is a

d a t a , t h e n one nerekv r e p l a c e s t h e Sass v i t h $!xi= r e d , r-kinq


e v e - y t h i n g t o g e t h e r ,133 s u e s t to I&-gest. ?.er the p w a e t r i c
d t h e ranks r a t h e r +dan t h e o r i q i n s i
method of a c d ~ s i si s a p ~ ~ l i et o
data. The i d e a of r e p l a c i n g t h e data v i t k t h e r e ? s i s t o trms-
:OR t h e o r i g i n a l o b s e r r a t i o o s i n t o rimbeys ttat more ne=-ly setis-
,T t h e a s s u n p t i o n s of t h e 2 a m z i e t r i c liodel, m d a t t h e seme t i n e
r e t a i n all o i t h e o r d i z a l Ll?ior=~stionc c n t a i n e d i n t h e o r i g i n a l
a&.
In the example used 13 this psper, t h e v e c t o r o f ranks R ( P ) --
is .i i n the c o n p u t a t i o n ( 3 . h ) o f F, t o g e t
i n s t e a d O? a
that the averaze ~.sl?:<??, sp?roacces noxL-l?t'fa . ~ i c k l jas :: ,cz.n,
:J.
not b e t
vnder r s t h e t m n e r x l c o n 2 t i o n s ) while t h e sazze A<.?:?t ~ ~ c
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

situatisn.
E k e t h e a l i ~ e dr & s grocedxre, t h e m % 4 t = a s f o f , procedlll~e
c ~ . ' J T I~ ~e?
sc!iaterar2lcn. Y a i ~ y 5i:uat:or.s vere e m z e d , ~a-toll',zr
t n e presence dr amence of n z i o u s ? ? f e e s , 2r.d: s ~ ~ l sr~ := s , s c
aomal, e q c c e n t l a , a d c = ~ t a * ~ ~ a t"SF&
& tats. - .- : G e s
-2

t n e n * d 1 distriSutisz a? the ",s= sts;',ix:c be:?aved ss vsll ;,='-.I

'tie m c C,?%~SP~FZ -",i,kf~Z, ar,Z xie p i e r s f tne tests v a s n e w :


r ~ c kyowl*, 1xi, s=ze:rsss zucs 7 e ' t : e ~ -PL-,T. tzt 7812; ;ywsns.-.
3 z . s Fs the 2&; &-ts D? =he i- z r a . s r 0 2 n ~e e avs-.? cf.
btil mG- evi-dcr?ce has 31E7. ccLlecte5, ve ? ~ c P - T P ~ ~
tae
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

p r e t a t i o n of t h e e q e r i n e n t a l r5suits.

f o r robustness s t u a e s and t-30 s i t u a t i c n s Cor power conparisons.


Speci,cicsll;r, let X be inde-,ender,t n o w ?&?don: v e z i a b l e s
i jk
u',th n e a m
i=l,...,4

and u n i t variances, as i n t h e l i n e a r model (3.1). k Y ijk a


eq{Xijk} be the obserwible l o p i c m d v m i a t e s . 5 u s %he ['I;qkJ
1
-'I
made 3f t h e ? b s e r ~ e " , r i r , i c C level: ( t n e ft,dles", ^- 537 vhich E,:_
U

could 3 e - r e j e c t e i > ps. '.ke i-,he=z=e".i=d.cri",ccnl 1 w e l s --i;',i=z'sllsv

t h r e e s t a t i s t i c s follow t h e i r h p o t h e s i z e d 2 i s t r i b u t i o n s q u i t e
clceeiy.
-
Z a o l e Z g ~ v e ssore n u r r e r i s a rot=.prisorls o i t h e .'
L.."-a- --
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

l a s t , c o l - g~i l e s :ze exazz TWO sided c r i t : c a l -


l e v e l & s a c - a h"cr
-'

-pith t h a t obserted 2 , f o r n = i030. 3 u S t h e c l o s e r ~ ~ & 3 8 t i o n


a f f o r d e d by Table 1, a d s p e c i i i c a l l y t h e l a s t c o l u n , shows t h a t
t h e s t a t i s z i c FR i s t h e or* one t h a t r y r e e s veil enough v i t h t h 3
t h e o r e t i c a l i d s t r i b u t i o n co have cm.e i n f a c t i r c n t h e theore-
t i c s l ALstribu3ion. 3.e cathey s t a t i s t i c s have d i s t r i 3 u t i o n s 'ahich
may be approxi.wte& r % a . 5 0 ~ a b Pvj e l l by t h e i r t h e o r e t i c a l d i s t r i b u -
t i o n s hovever, as i n d i ~ a t e . ' by t h e s n a i l v s l u e s o f D.
%e second s i t u a t i o n i n t r o d x e s n u i s a n c e p a r m e t e r s i n t h e
Cora of x p l i c s t i o n e f f e c t s o,=-,5,
A -
09=+.5, w h i l e t h e o t h e r p&v-
meters r%ain sr, zero. 3 i s i s iztended t o represent a rdld f o m
of d e t r i a t l c n Prm t h e First s i t u a t i o n . 'Ke r e s u l t s as given i n
-Figre 2 show essecti&:r t h e sar,e . ~ s u l t s as i n F i g w e 1, v h i &
i n d i c a t e s t h a t a l l th-e s t a t i s t i c s are r e l a t i v e l y r o b u s t i n t h e
aresence of s l i j l t n u i s a c e factors. Table I1 p r e s e n t s some
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014
a m e r ' i c d ccq-<so-s. Tzc - 2
s e a = c m e z t s a.m --
nere as 82~11ed=:
n
,abLe I.
3 the tA*rc? a d f h L sl_l?zz:a= f;? :ze c.LI ? ~ i ~ ~ z ~ e ~ ~ s ,
severe strsin is ?xi, on tze = r 9 ~ 0 5 x - e str, x e 313, 3: .5;i3cxi
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

%me nunerical ~ c o q ~ i s o nasr z given ic Table ,F?,


%e 2 n d paver stzdy incorporates %he ntlisaqce parmeters

Sy the presence of nuisance parmeters. The 2s-dt shows the


W e r of the rsdr statisrics '2 and TR t o be reletively uaafiected
L -
UY
LL
.ne nuisance ? = a ~ e t e r s , vhile the paver ol" $he 7 test 3r. ?he
raw data i s c i i d c i s h e d s m s ~ h a \ easpeeielly Zo? vaiues o f a be-
tween .10 and .50.
AS a segarace item oi ioterest the 60 x 60 s a q l e covariance
--
;agtrix of R ( Y 1 vas c m u t e d
acnt, in each of the five
tor the 1000 repetitions o f the e x p r i -
cases. The correlation betveen r.snics
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014
srh=cb ? r e s e ~ z + ca c c v a r i a x e =tr4ix 'that -aser;jle&a CC~EST,B.IT,t i~es
zne id.entizjr z a t r i x . % i s o?f-.rs so=% ? e l m a : i o r f c r t h e zacd
Seze-rior of t h e ? s t a iI,ab,,
i - + l a vLiit5 ',he rmk zr-asPs-.

convenient procedure t o use ,&en ".e assuzpzlons of a l m e a r a o d e l


and narlealljf d i s t r i b u t e d e r r o r % e r a s are r e e s c n e 5 l e f o r t h e d a t a
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

t i o n , given : e r t a i n cmii,llrstions of r e z k s , of che t e s t s t a t i s t i c


cax~be o b t a i n e d t o f ~ ~ i a
s he x a c t nonp%-e~etric proceokre, buz
t h e c o q u t a t i o c s involpet? are t o o l a b o r i o u s even f o r kiqh speed
c o q u z e r s except i n tne slrsplest c a s e s , Therefore ar. 8syn.p-
t o t i c a p p r o x i n e t i o n is mna"y m p l o y e d f o r t h e = e s t s t a t i s t i c .
Aligned rsrsks 3rocedu=es s t i l l r e l j on t h e a s s u n ~ t i o no f a l i . . e c
model i o r t h e i r v a l i d i t y . i.lthctl@ sli-ed ranks t e s t s are
a v a i l a b l e ?or many s i t u a t i c n s such as t h e one i l l u s t r a t e d o r
i n t e r a t i o n i n a two va;i l a y o u t :t-ith r z o l i c a t i c n , =hey are n o t
s v a i l a b i e f o r cthe? s i t c a t i o n s such as f o r f z s t i n g t r e a t n e n t o r
block e l i e c t s i n :he 3 r e s e n c e of t z a t x e n t - b l o c k i n t e r a c t i o n .
?hese t e s t s are z o r e x e n e r s l thari w e i x d i c a t e i n t h s j a p e r ; one
ma?f use a v i 6 e v = i e t y of s c o r e s , o t h e r t h a n n e r e l y r a d k s , arrd one
say a l i g n u s i n g medians, nidqu&,-tilas, o r other s t a t i s t i c s r a t h e r
t h a n mans a s we used here. P i s allovs nars f l e x i b i l i t y f o z t h e
e m e r i e n c e d a r a , c t i t i o n e r , 5 z t a l s o ceuses c o ~ s i d e r a b l ? cen?usicn
?
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014
Downloaded by [Johann Christian Senckenberg] at 10:06 11 September 2014

You might also like