Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Technology 9/10
Vancouver Technical
2003
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 2 20/07/2003
Index:
Rational Page 3
Objectives /Learning outcomes Page 3
Planning Grid 5
Ping-Pong Activity Page 6
Paper Trebuchet Activity Page 8
Main Differences Between Siege Machines Page 9
Siege Machines History Page 10
Levers Page 15
Trebuchet Design Page 17
Scoring Rubric Page 24
Ballista Overhead Page 26
Trebuchet Overhead Page 27
Catapult Overhead Page 28
Levers info Overhead Page 29
Lever Overhead Page 30
Trebuchet Release sequence Overhead Page 31
Release info Overhead Page 33
Quiz Page 34
Notes Page 36
Distance Overhead Page 37
Accuracy Overhead Page 38
Battle Overhead Page 39
Trebuchet Evaluation Key 40
Lesson plans/lectures 41
Sources 47
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 3 20/07/2003
RATIONAL:
This unit was developed at the beginning of the U.S. lead Iraqi invasion/war. The
students where very interested in the subject of war and I wanted to try and find a
project that I could do in my technology 9/10 class that would approach some of
these issues. I choose the paper trebuchet project because the class was
scheduled in a non-shop environment and was therefore limited in tools and
equipment.
At first glance medieval siege engines may not seem related to modern warfare,
however, I wanted to discusses with the students that many of the modern
technologies that we take for granted every day came about because of
principles and theories discovered in military research throughout our history.
Second I wanted to get the students to take a stance on how they felt about using
technologies developed for military purposes in their everyday life. For example
how many students are aware of the fact that the World Wide Web (WWW) or
internet as we know it was original developed by the US military. Finally, I wanted
to introduce my students to some basic engineering principles and term
associated with levers.
OUTLINE OF CONTENT:
Students will be introduced to medieval siege engines, through lectures, a video,
construction, and testing. Students will learn a brief history and the main
differences between the following siege engines: Trebuchet, Catapult, and
Ballista. Class one levers will be discussed in relationship to the working of a
trebuchet and key terms such as lever, fulcrum, effort and load will be
highlighted. Issues around using military developed technologies will be
discussed.
PLANNING GRID:
PING-PONG ACTIVITY
Design challenge:
Working in pairs, design, construction, and test a device for launching a single
ping-pong ball the furthest distance using only the materials and tools supplied in
class. All devices must rest on the ground and are not to be held down by human
force. Distance is measured from where the ping-pong contacts the ground first,
not to where it rolls. You cannot alter the ping-pong in any way.
Procedure:
3. Use pencil / pen and paper to illustrate ideas in rapid sketches. Explain
your ideas to your partner.
8. Once construction has finished we will test your design for distance.
10. Make sure block # and both team members name are on all your work.
SUGGESTED MATERIALS:
o Scissors and razor blades
o Ruler
o Hot Glue
o Glue stick
o Tape
o Card board boxes
o Card board paper
o Welding rod
o Side cutters
o String
o Paper clip x 2
o Paper
General Suggestions:
DESIGN BRIEF:
Your task is to build a model of a mighty siege machine called a trebuchet that
will fling a projectile across a far distance. You are only allowed to use the
materials provided to build your trebuchet: Your projectile will be assigned in
class.
PROBLEM:
RESOURCES:
PARAMETERS:
o You may not use any materials to construct the trebuchet besides the
ones supplied in class. However, you have to bring in your own small
rocks for the counter weight.
o Your team name and logo must appear on the trebuchet in color.
o Your trebuchet may only fire assigned projectiles.
o You must get permission from your teacher to fire your trebuchet.
o If anything is unclear just ask!
o Have fun building ☺
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 9 20/07/2003
CATAPULT HISTORY:
Medieval Arms Race
War in medieval times was about the control of land. Garrisons of knights and
other soldiers who lived in castles controlled the land around their stone
fortresses. To conquer a territory, an attacking army would have to strike and
take these central strongholds.
To do so, they would launch a siege. Over the centuries, medieval armies
developed military strategies to fight a siege. Weapons of war also evolved, often
in response to the technological advances of the enemy. By the mid-12th
century, siege warfare had developed into a science, practiced by an engineer
corps called ingeniatores.
One of the earliest types of catapults, the arrow catapult, could shoot a large
number of arrows at once. The moving arm of the catapult was attached to a
thick rope. To pull back the arm, someone would twist a screw-like device that
the rope was attached to. The arm would hit several arrows lined up and shoot
them a great distance.
The Ballista and Trebuchet came later. The Ballista was propelled by creating
torsion by wrapping thick ropes around a stationary axle stick and the moving
arm of the catapult. This catapult was used to shoot large, weighty rocks at a
castle. The Ballista, however, had little accuracy.
The Trebuchet used heavy weights and a sling to propel objects. The ammunition
was loaded into the sling, which was attached to the arm of the catapult. The arm
was connected to a stationary rod, allowing it to swing freely. The weight was
attached to the side of the arm opposite to the sling.
These catapults were used in siege warfare to take over castles. The Ballista
hurled huge rocks while the Trebuchet often hurled dead animals into the castle
to spread disease.
The trebuchet was the dominant siege weapon in Europe from 850AD to
1350AD, lasting 100 years after the introduction of gunpowder. In England it was
called an Ingenium, and the technicians who worked on the weapon were
Ingeniators (Engineers). Larger versions were able to throw large stones, cows or
even shunned negotiators. Rotting flesh was also popular.
The trebuchet operates by harnessing the potential energy of a suspended
weight, and demonstrates many physical principals. There are multiple variables
in the design, which can be adjusted to optimize range and throw-weight.
Trebuchet was the first war machine to use biological warfare.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 11 20/07/2003
OFFENSE:
Direct Assault #1
A direct assault was the most dangerous way for attackers to try to take a castle.
Soldiers either scaled walls with ladders or overran castle walls breached by
tunnels, battering rams, or artillery.
Sometimes they attacked two or three spots around the castle at once to surprise
their foe or divide castle defenses, and sometimes they approached the wall
hidden within a trench or tunnel. Archers and crossbowmen would cover soldiers
while they tried to break a wall or storm over it.
Siege Tower #2
Attackers sometimes built a siege tower to scale castle walls. Soldiers lay in wait
inside the structure as others wheeled it to the castle. Once there, the soldiers
lowered a drawbridge at the top of the tower onto the castle wall. Some towers
were almost 100 feet high, and in the siege of Kenilworth Castle, fully 200
archers and 11 catapults were crowded into a single tower.
Siege towers were difficult and time-consuming to build, however, and castle
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 12 20/07/2003
defenders could burn them down with fire arrows or firepots (launched pots filled
with flaming liquids such as tar). Sometimes castle knights launched surprise
raids on a tower to destroy it during construction. To protect their siege engine,
attackers draped it with rawhides of mules or oxen.
Trebuchet #3
During peacetime, castle commanders used trebuchets to launch roses at ladies
during tournaments. But during a siege, these missile launchers were one of the
most fearsome weapons of medieval times.
Early trebuchets were powered by muscle, but later versions relied on a huge
counterweight that swung a long arm. When the counterweight was dropped, the
device launched a missile from a sling at the end of the arm.
If a trebuchet was set up too close to a castle, archers would harass its builders
with arrows shot from bows or bolts from crossbows. Castle defenders also
would try to destroy rising trebuchets with catapults shot from the castle wall or
with sneak attacks to burn it down.
Battering Ram #4
Siege armies used a battering ram to break down a gatehouse door or even
smash a castle wall. To shield themselves from attack, they built a covered shed,
in which they hung a thick tree trunk on chains suspended from a beam above.
Carpenters tapered the trunk into a blunt point and capped it with iron. The slow
forward movement as the battering ram was wheeled toward the castle wall
earned it the nickname "tortoise." Soldiers swung the hanging trunk back and
forth, and the forward end of the trunk moved in and out of the shed like a
tortoise's head, battering its target.
Castle defenders tried to burn the shed down with flaming arrows, though
attackers responded by covering the shed with animal pelts or earth to make it
fireproof. Defenders sometimes dropped mattresses down to cushion the blows
or lowered grappling irons to grasp the trunk, preventing it from swinging.
Tunnel #5
Men called sappers sometimes dug tunnels to gain entrance to a castle and
thereby launch a sneak attack, but more often, these miners dug tunnels beneath
a castle wall to destabilize and topple it. They supported their tunnels with
timbers, which they then burned to collapse the tunnel -- and, hopefully, the wall
above.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 13 20/07/2003
To defend themselves, castle dwellers put out a bowl of water and watched for
ripples that might indicate digging. Sometimes the castle's garrison built counter-
tunnels; if the two tunnels met, fierce battles ensued underground.
DEFENSE:
Walls #6
At first castle walls were wooden, making them cheap and quick to build, but they
were vulnerable to arson. Stone walls followed, and with each generation they
grew thicker and taller. From the mid-13th century, many castles had concentric
rings of walls, one encircling the other. Caerphilly Castle is the earliest example
of this in Britain, and the largest castle ever built in Wales. Low outer walls
served as barriers against siege towers and battering rams. If attackers managed
to break through this outer ring of defense, castle defenders could retreat behind
high inner walls.
Corner towers stood out from the walls, giving defenders a better perspective on
enemy movements. Windows were rare; instead, slits called loopholes were built
for archers. Sometimes builders thickened walls low to the ground to protect
them from battering rams. Often, these walls sloped away at the base to redirect
objects dropped from the top of the castle wall, ricocheting them out at soldiers
on the ground.
Because they had walls to protect them, castle defenders would sometimes
hunker down and try to wait out their attackers. Those inside made sure they
could be self-sufficient when cut off from the outside world by a siege. They built
wells and kept livestock inside their walls, guaranteeing fresh water and fresh
meat during a siege. They also salted foods such as bacon and fish and stored
grains and beans by the barrel-full.
Castle garrisons also stockpiled weapons, for reinforcements often could not get
through. If a siege continued into winter, castle dwellers had more protection from
the elements than attackers, and if their rations held up, also more food to
sustain them.
Those besieged inside a castle often negotiated time frames for surrender with
the enemy. For example, a castle garrison might tell an attacking army that they
would surrender if reinforcements did not appear by a specified date. This would
save lives on both sides and avoid the steep financial costs of a siege as well.
Archers #7
Both attacking and defending armies had archers, though those shooting arrows
from the castle had a great advantage. First, castle archers were almost always
launching arrows from a higher position than castle attackers, which extended
their range and provided them with a good view of their human targets.
The castle wall also protected them well. Loopholes, the narrow slits that archers
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 14 20/07/2003
shot through, were often splayed to the inside, allowing castle archers a wide
latitude of targets. The design enabled archers to hide off to the side of the
loopholes while reloading, giving them protection from the rare arrow that did find
its way in. Horizontally cut loopholes gave castle archers an even greater range.
The archer had three weapons to choose from. The most powerful was the
crossbow. Barbs on the head of a bolt, the stout arrow shot from a crossbow,
were often coated with beeswax to help them pierce armor. Crossbows took
longer to load than the simple bow or the longbow. A longbow archer could shoot
about 12 arrows in the time it took to launch a single bolt. Moreover, the longbow
could send arrows as far as 1,000 feet. But longbows took tremendous strength
to shoot and much practice to control.
Gatehouse #8
The gatehouse, the castle's entrance, was the early castle's most vulnerable
point. Later, military engineers bolstered it with impressive defenses. A
drawbridge could be pulled back, lifted, or pivoted like a see saw, while
portcullises -- iron-covered wooden grills that moved up and down in front of the
gatehouse door -- provided additional protection. Castle dwellers could also slide
wooden beams behind the doors to reinforce them.
If attackers broke down the outer door and entered the gate's passageway, they
ran the risk of being trapped. Sometimes defenders would drop a portcullis
behind them. Roofs above gate passages often had so-called "murder holes"
through which castle soldiers could drop burning oil, hot sand (able to enter
armor), or scalding water onto enemy soldiers. Loopholes in the walls of the gate
passage also gave defending archers -- only feet away from trapped attackers --
a deadly advantage.
Moat #9
Moats surrounding castles protected them from siege towers and battering rams,
war machines that were only effective when wheeled to the wall. It also made
digging tunnels underneath the wall far more challenging. To get across a moat,
the attacking army sometimes filled the moat with rocks and soil or built portable
wooden bridges.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 15 20/07/2003
ABOUT LEVERS:
When describing levers you need these four terms: lever, fulcrum, effort, and
load. The lever itself is long and stiff. The fulcrum is the resisting point where the
lever turns or pivots. Effort is the force you apply and load is what you move.
When you apply effort, the lever pivots around the fulcrum moving the load.
The job the lever must do determines how the load, effort, and fulcrum are
arranged. This arrangement determines the class of lever. Look at the following
illustrations:
Once students understand the three different classes of levers, they will
recognize them all around. Here's a quick method to classify levers.
a. Find the fulcrum. If it's in the middle, it's a Class 1. On the end, it's a Class
2 or 3.
b. To determine whether it's 2 or 3, find the load. If it's in the middle, it's a
Class 2. On the end, it's a Class 3.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 16 20/07/2003
TREBUCHET DESIGN:
Let's get started and look at what happens after you've put on your helmet,
moved well off to the side of the trebuchet and pulled the rope tied to the trigger
mechanism...
Figure 1.
This diagram shows a trebuchet shortly after the trigger has been released. The
shot is in the sling and is beginning to slide backwards along a launch trough.
The trough is put there to guide the sling and prevent it from getting caught up in
the trebuchet's framework. In the early part of the launch all the shot's motion is
horizontal and this speed will contribute to the rate at which the sling is going to
be whipped around the end of the treb's beam later. The trebuchet is designed so
that the beam is pulled down as nearly vertical as is practical. This gives two
benefits: 1. The weight has the longest distance to fall this way and 2. The first
movement of the beam gives the most horizontal pull to the sling. The sling has
to be picked up by the beam, so it can't be too long. (You wouldn't want the treb
to be standing with its beam in the air and the shot still in the trough) Generally,
this means a sling length something less than the beam's throwing arm length,
although some medieval illustrations show longer slings.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 18 20/07/2003
Figure 2
Here the trebuchet beam has rotated and of course the end holding the sling has
risen. The shot has been pulled down the trough and is now speeding
backwards, but it has also been lifted up and clear.
Now, any weight which is tied by a length of rope to the end of a rotating beam is
going to swing out - the so-called centrifugal force (okay, it's actually just inertia
in action, but you get the picture). Our shot's motion has this effect plus the
speed it has already acquired. The result is that the sling will rotate around the
end of the beam.
Figure 3.
If your trebuchet's release mechanism is the usual ring over a prong or hook, it is
going to release the sling as soon as the angle between the sling ropes and the
arm is straight enough for the ring to slip off the prong.
You can adjust when the sling releases in a number of ways:
By setting the angle of the prong - a more hooked prong will hold the sling loop
longer than a straighter one.
I.e. a prong less hooked or in line with beam = earlier release = higher
trajectory
... a prong more hooked or forward-pointing = later release = flatter
trajectory
By changing the length of the cords that hold the sling pouch..
If the sling is rotating around the end of the beam slowly, the beam will
have time to swing through a bigger arc before the sling catches up to it. If
the sling is rotating quickly, the release angle will happen earlier.
A shorter sling will rotate faster than a long sling.
i.e. short sling cords = fast sling rotation = earlier release = higher
trajectory
... long sling cords = slow sling rotation = later release = flatter trajectory
By choosing the size of your shot..
Another thing that influences when a sling releases is the force on it - a
heavier projectile tends to pull the loop off the prong earlier than a lighter
projectile does.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 19 20/07/2003
Figure 4.
Finally, the follow-through ... A bit disappointing, really. It's not as much as you
might imagine.
If you had the weight fixed rigidly to the end of your treb's beam (like Huw
Kennedy's huge piano and car throwing beast in Britain) you would have a simple
pendulum and it might well oscillate majestically until it eventually came to a stop.
The design shown in figures 1 to 4 uses a free-swinging weight and the
interfering motions pull up the beam in a series of jerks and starts.
(Note that this is more noticeable in a small model than a large machine.)
Wheels/No wheels:
When modern engineers first examined medieval drawings of trebuchets, they
couldn't help but notice that they often had wheels.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 20 20/07/2003
Their first assumption was that the wheels were added to roll the weapon around
the landscape and to help aim it, which was probably true in smaller machines.
As modern engineers began to reconstruct these monster machines, however,
they came to realize that they were too heavy to roll on medieval roads, much
less battlefields.
They also noticed something else: These rolling behemoths fire appreciably
farther than their stuck-in-the-mud cousins. Modern engineers suspect that their
medieval counterparts may have observed the same thing and stayed with the
wheeled design as they built the machines larger.
Why is a trebuchet that rolls forward and back again more stable and powerful
than its cousin? Well, one of the design flaws of the wheel-less trebuchet is its
tendency to rear up into the air as its arm begins to spin and then slam back
down. This monstrous lurch can destroy the trebuchet rather than the castle wall.
Rolling wheels prevent the crushing lurch. Instead, energy is more smoothly
channeled into the trebuchet's arm and missile.
Wheels add power as the trebuchet rolls forward. Like a pitcher who leans toward
home plate as he hurls, the forward motion adds velocity to the pitched weight.
The rolling back and forth of the wheeled counterweight also allows it to fall in a
straighter line, the most efficient way for a counterweight to respond to the force
of gravity.
SLING LENGTH:
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 21 20/07/2003
When the sling was added to the trebuchet it gave the tossed projectile more
velocity. This meant the trebuchet could send a lighter projectile farther, providing
more distance between those who fired the machines and deadly enemy archers
at the castle.
Here's how it works. The sling lies on a track at the base of the trebuchet. As the
arm of the trebuchet begins to move, the sling drags the ball before lifting it into
the air. This gives the swinging arm time to pick up speed.
However, the ball's weight affects more than the distance it will fly. A lighter ball
traveling at the same velocity as a heavier ball will land with less force. That's
why some of the lighter stone balls launched, hit the mark, yet bounce off
harmlessly. The stone's mass is not great enough to break through the sturdy
castle wall.
With too heavy a ball, you may suffer the same fate as you wished to inflict upon
your enemy: The ball could fly straight up and back down. That's because your
trebuchet cannot provide enough energy to counteract the pull of gravity that
holds your heavy ball down.
There is danger, as well, in erring in the direction of too light a ball. Too light a
ball might not be able to accept all the energy that the trebuchet's swinging arm
can deliver. Where does the energy go? It may go into the trebuchet's axle pivot,
its base, or into its scaffolding, destroying your trebuchet rather than the enemy
castle's wall.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 22 20/07/2003
DISTANCE:
How far from the castle you situate your trebuchet matters for a few reasons. The
closer the trebuchet, the more likely you are to hit your target. However, the
opposite is also true, which is that the closer you are, the more likely it is that
enemy soldiers will hit you--with an arrow.
The farther away your trebuchet, the farther you'll have to send your missile. And
the farther your missile must travel, the longer the force of gravity will be pulling
on its flight. To counteract gravity's steady pull, you must convey more energy to
the ball. A few adjustments to your trebuchet will do this, including:
Even the earliest military technicians understood the potential of "the seesaw
effect" of a lever. As gravity pulls a heavier weight down on one side of the
seesaw, the lighter weight on the other side of the seesaw's fulcrum is lifted. If
the object on one side falls with great force, the one on the other side might
become airborne.
When military designers tweaked the point of the axle on the lever arm (creating
one arm longer than the other) and raised the axle high above the ground, they
had built their first functioning trebuchet.
But how did these military people maximize the downward pull of the short arm?
The answer: They added literally tons of weight. During the siege against the
Scots castle of Stirling, Edward I of England sent orders out to strip all of the
church roofs in the entire surrounding area of lead. These gathered sheets of
lead were believed to have been melted down and then attached to the
counterweight of the trebuchet. The lead attached to the NOVA-built, fixed-weight
trebuchet weighed a hefty six-and-one-half tons.
The most efficient way for any counterweight to respond to the force of gravity is
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 23 20/07/2003
by falling in a straight line. It's the same reason that a free-falling stone dropped
from an altitude of 3,000 feet will hit the ground with greater force than a rock that
is rolled down the side of a 3,000-foot mountain. In a fixed-weight trebuchet, the
weight must fall in an arc, following the arc at the end of the lever arm.
SCORING RUBRIC:
BALLISTA
CATAPULT:
ABOUT LEVERS:
RELEASE MECHANISM:
NAME___________BLOCK___________
TREBUCHET QUIZ
Notes:
• Testing distance: Measure out the distance of your classroom or a hall and
then place tape at 1 or 2 foot intervals. Record students 3 attempts and
average or total.
• Battle: Split the class into 2 groups and give every trebuchet team a
Styrofoam block. The groups then face each other in 2 rows on each side.
Place the Styrofoam block in front of each trebuchet; if the Styrofoam block is
hit then that team is eliminated.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 37 20/07/2003
10
11
12
13
14
15
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 41 20/07/2003
LECTURE ONE:
2. Objectives:
The goal of this section is to introduce students to the three main catapults
and their design differences.
3. Lesson Strategy:
I will use overhead pictures of the different siege machines and models to
show the students the main design differences between the Ballista,
Catapult, and Trebuchet.
4. Instructional Materials:
• Lesson plan.
• Overheads
• Model Trebuchet.
6. Procedure:
a. Show model of Trebuchet (hook)
i. Fire a projectile
ii. Name parts of Trebuchet during firing.
b. Show Trebuchet Overhead
i. Go over nomenclature
ii. Mechanical principles
• Weighted beam etc.
c. Show Ballista Overhead
i. Go over nomenclature
ii. Mechanical principles
• Stored tension etc.
d. Show Catapult Overhead
i. Go over nomenclature
ii. Mechanical principles
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 42 20/07/2003
8. Integration:
a. Social issues
i. War
ii. Deforestation
iii. Economics
b. Engineering.
i. Physics
ii. Math
9. Social Context:
Stress the profound effect that the siege machines had on the medieval way of life.
11. Questions:
• What is the main difference in the force used between the Trebuchet and
the Catapult? (weighted beam VS stored tension)
12. Summary:
This unit explores the Trebuchet, Catapult, and Ballista and covers the main
differences in appearance, design and forces used.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 43 20/07/2003
LECTURE TWO:
2. Objectives:
The goal of this section is to introduce students to the classification of
levers and the principles behind that classification.
The students will demonstrate the ability to:
• Identify a class one, two, and three lever.
• Identify forces involved in lever classification like lever, fulcrum,
effort, and load.
3. Lesson Strategy:
I will use overhead pictures of levers to show the students the main
differences between a class one and three lever. I will demonstrate how a
Trebuchet is a class one lever.
4. Instructional Materials:
• Lesson plan.
• Overheads
• Model Trebuchet.
6. Procedure:
a. Show Levers Overhead
i. Go over nomenclature
• Lever
• Fulcrum
• Effort
• Load
b. Class one lever
i. examples
c. Class two lever
i. Examples
d. Class three lever
i. examples
7. Integration:
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 44 20/07/2003
e. Engineering.
i. Physics
ii. Math
8. Social Context:
The understanding of levers allows us to better navigate our world and manipulate
it in ways that benefit use
9. New Terms:
f. Beam
g. Lever
h. Fulcrum
i. Effort
j. Force
10. Questions:
• What are some examples of class one, two, and three levers from everyday
life?
11. Summary:
This unit explores the classification of levers and the terminology associated with
them. It also links the concept of a class one lever with the design of a Trebuchet.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 45 20/07/2003
LECTURE THREE:
2. Objectives:
The goal of this section is to introduce students to the main factors that
affect sling release timing so that they can test these principles on their
model Trebuchets to produce the best possible test results for distance and
accuracy.
3. Lesson Strategy:
Demonstrate with the Trebuchet model how changes to the angle of the
prong, sling length, and projectile weight affect Trebuchet range.
4. Instructional Materials:
• Lesson plan.
• Info overheads
• Model Trebuchet.
6. Procedure:
k. Show Trebuchet Info overhead
l. Show model of Trebuchet
i. Fire a projectile changing the angle of the prong, sling length, and
projectile weight.
8. Integration:
n. Engineering.
i. Physics
ii. Math
9. New Terms:
o. Sling
p. Prong
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 46 20/07/2003
q. Projectile
10. Questions:
• What happens to the trajectory of the projectile if you:
1. Bend the prong forward?
2. Bend the prong backward?
3. Shorten the sling length?
4. Lengthen the sling length?
5. Increase the projectile weight?
6. Decrease the projectile weight?
11. Summary:
This unit explores how you can change the trajectory of a Trebuchet by altering the angle
of the prong, length of the sling, and weight of the projectile.
E. Silver, Vancouver Technical Page 47 20/07/2003
SOURCES:
Thanks to Ron Carniello at Vancouver Technical Secondary for his input and
help with the development of this unit plan.
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question127.htm/printable
http://science.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=question127.htm&url=http:/
/members.iinet.net.au/~rmine/middel3.html
http://science.howstuffworks.com/framed.htm?parent=question127.htm&url=http:/
/www.middelaldercentret.dk/warengines.htm
http://nfo.edu/trebuche.htm
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/lostempires/trebuchet/builds.html
http://members.iinet.net.au/~rmine/howtreb.html
(video)
Secrets of Lost Empires: Medieval Siege
PBS Airdate: February 1, 2000
http://whs.wsd.wednet.edu/Sci/Lorenson/Catapult/catapultmain.html
(catapult lesson plan)