Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Solutions to Questions
8-1 The contribution margin (CM) ratio is neither earns a profit nor incurs a loss. It can
the ratio of contribution margin to total sales also be defined as the point where total
revenue. The CM ratio shows the change in revenues equal total costs, and as the point
contribution margin that will result from where total contribution margin equals total
increases and decreases in sales revenue. A fixed costs.
dollar increase in contribution margin will result
in a dollar increase in net income. Therefore, for 8-7 Three approaches to break-even
planning purposes, a product’s CM ratio is analysis are (a) the equation method, (b) the
extremely helpful in projecting potential contribution margin method, and (c) the
contribution margin and potential net income. graphical method. In the equation method, the
equation is: Sales = Variable expenses + Fixed
8-2 An incremental analysis focuses on the expenses + Profits, where profits are zero at the
changes in revenue, cost, and volume that will break-even point. The equation is solved to
result from a particular action. determine the break-even point in units or dollar
sales. In the contribution margin method, the
8-3 Company B will tend to realize the most total fixed costs are divided by the contribution
rapid increase in profits. The reason is that margin per unit to obtain the break-even point
Company B will have a higher contribution in units. Alternatively, the total fixed costs can
margin ratio than Company A due to its lower be divided by the contribution margin ratio to
variable costs. Thus, contribution margin (and obtain the break-even point in sales dollars. In
net income) will increase more rapidly as sales the graphical method, total cost and total
increase. revenue data are plotted on a two-axis graph.
The intersection of the total cost and the total
8-4 Operating leverage measures the impact revenue lines indicates the break-even point.
on net income of a given percentage change in The graph shows the break-even point in both
sales. The degree of operating leverage at a units and dollars of sales.
given level of sales is computed by dividing the
contribution margin at that level of sales by the 8-8 (a) The total revenue line would rise
net income. less steeply, and the break-even point would
occur at a higher volume of units. (b) Both the
8-5 No. A ten percent decrease in the selling fixed cost line and the total cost line would shift
price will have a greater impact on profits than a upward; the break-even point would occur at a
ten percent increase in variable expenses, since higher volume of units. (c) The total cost line
the selling price is a larger figure than the would rise more steeply, and the break-even
variable expenses. Mathematically, the same point would occur at a higher volume of units.
percentage applied to a larger base will yield a
larger result. In addition, the selling price affects
how much of the product will be sold.
You can get the same net income using the following approach.
Original net income.......................................................................
$15,000
Change in contribution margin
(1,000 units × $20.00 per unit) ..................................................
20,000
New net income ...........................................................................
$35,000
You can get the same net income using the following approach.
Original net income.......................................................................
$15,000
Change in contribution margin
(-1,000 units × $20.00 per unit) .................................................
(20,000)
New net income (loss) ..................................................................
($5,000)
2. The change in net income from an increase in total sales of $1,100 can be estimated
by using the CM ratio as follows:
Change in total sales.....................................................................
$1,100
× CM ratio ...................................................................................
40 %
= Estimated change in net income .................................................
$ 440
Original New
Total unit sales .............................................................................
50,000 50,275
Sales............................................................................................
$200,000 $201,100
Less variable expenses ..................................................................
120,000 120,660
Contribution margin ......................................................................
80,000 80,440
Less fixed expenses ......................................................................
65,000 65,000
Net income...................................................................................
$ 15,000 $ 15,440
1. The following table shows the effect of the proposed change in monthly advertising
budget:
Sales With
Additional
Current Advertising
Sales Budget Difference
Sales............................................................................................
$180,000 $189,000 $ 9,000
Less variable expenses ..................................................................
126,000 132,300 6,300
Contribution margin ......................................................................
54,000 56,700 2,700
Less fixed expenses ......................................................................
30,000 35,000 5,000
Net income...................................................................................
$ 24,000 $ 21,700 $(2,300)
Assuming no other important factors need to be considered, the increase in the
advertising budget should not be approved since it would lead to a decrease in net
income of $2,300.
Alternative Solution 1
Expected total contribution margin:
$189,000 × 30% CM ratio ..........................................................
$56,700
Present total contribution margin:
$180,000 × 30% CM ratio ..........................................................
54,000
Incremental contribution margin ....................................................
2,700
Change in fixed expenses:
Less incremental advertising expense .........................................
5,000
Change in net income ...................................................................
$(2,300)
Alternative Solution 2
Incremental contribution margin:
$9,000 × 30% CM ratio ............................................................
$ 2,700
Less incremental advertising expense ............................................
5,000
Change in net income ...................................................................
$(2,300)
2. The $2.50 increase in variable costs will cause the unit contribution margin to
decrease from $27 to $24.50 with the following impact on net income:
Expected total contribution margin with the higher-
quality components:
2,200 units × $24.50 per unit .....................................................
$53,900
Present total contribution margin:
2,000 units × $27 per unit .........................................................
54,000
Change in total contribution margin ...............................................
($ 100)
Assuming no change in fixed costs and all other factors remain the same, the
higher-quality components should NOT be used.
NOTE: This question is a nice illustration that an incremental approach is not always a
preferable approach to finding a solution. The solution is not determinable by a simple
inspection of the information. The reason is that there are two variables that are
changing: the unit CM and the sales volume. The best approach is to compare the
status quo to the new situation which will have BOTH changes incorporated.
1. The equation method yields the break-even point in unit sales, Q, as follows:
Sales = Variable expenses + Fixed expenses + Profits
$54Q = $45Q + $25,200 + $0
$9Q = $25,200
Q = $25,200 ÷ $9 per basket
Q = 2,800 baskets
2. The equation method can be used to compute the break-even point in sales dollars,
X, as follows:
Percent of
Per Unit Sales
Sales price ...................................................................................
$54 100.00%
Less variable expenses ..................................................................
45 83.33%
Contribution margin ......................................................................
$9 16.67%
3. The contribution margin method gives an answer that is identical to the equation
method for the break-even point in unit sales:
Break-even point in units sold = Fixed expenses ÷ Unit CM
= $25,200 ÷ $9 per basket
= 2,800 baskets
4. The contribution margin method also gives an answer that is identical to the
equation method for the break-even point in dollar sales:
Break-even point in sales dollars = Fixed expenses ÷ CM ratio
= $25,200 ÷ 0.1667
= $151,170*
* differs from $54 x 2,800 = $151,200 due to rounding
1. The CVP graph can be plotted using the three steps outlined in the text. The graph
appears on the next page.
Step 1. Draw a line parallel to the volume axis to represent the total fixed
expense. For this company, the total fixed expense is $24,000.
Step 2. Choose some volume of sales and plot the point representing total
expenses (fixed and variable) at the activity level you have selected. We'll use the
sales level of 8,000 units.
Fixed expense ..............................................................................
$ 24,000
Variable expense (8,000 units × $18 per unit) ................................ 144,000
Total expense ...............................................................................
$168,000
Step 3. Choose some volume of sales and plot the point representing total sales
dollars at the activity level you have selected. We'll use the sales level of 8,000 units
again.
Total sales revenue (8,000 units × $24 per unit) ............................
$192,000
2. The break-even point is the point where the total sales revenue and the total
expense lines intersect. This occurs at sales of 4,000 units. This can be verified by
solving for the break-even point in unit sales, Q, using the equation method as
follows:
Sales = Variable expenses + Fixed expenses + Profits
$24Q = $18Q + $24,000 + $0
$6Q = $24,000
Q = $24,000 ÷ $6 per unit
Q = 4,000 units
$200,000
$150,000
Dollars
$100,000
$50,000
$0
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
Volume in Units
* Target profit in the above equation is the before-tax profit computed as $15,000 ÷
0.60 = $25,000.
1. To compute the margin of safety, we must first compute the break-even unit sales.
Sales = Variable expenses + Fixed expenses + Profits
$48Q = $28Q + $30,000 + $0
$20Q = $30,000
Q = $30,000 ÷ $20 per unit
Q = 1,500 units
Sales (at the budgeted volume of 2,000 units) ............................... $96,000
Break-even sales (at 1,500 units) ..................................................
72,000
Margin of safety (in dollars)...........................................................
$ 24,000
2. A 10% decrease in sales should result in a 36.9% decrease (3.69 × 10%) in net
income.
3. The new income statement reflecting the change in sales would be:
Percent of
Amount Sales
Sales............................................................................................
$86,400 100%
Less variable expenses ..................................................................
51,840 60%
Contribution margin ......................................................................
34,560 40%
Less fixed expenses ......................................................................
28,000
Net income...................................................................................
$6,560
Net income reflecting change in sales ............................................
$ 6,560
Original net income.......................................................................
$10,400
Percent change in net income........................................................
36.9%
1.
Before proposal
Total
Sales ...........................................................................................
$20,000
Less variable expenses ..................................................................
30,000
Contribution margin ......................................................................
(10,000)
Less fixed expenses ......................................................................
30,000
Net income...................................................................................
$ (40,000)
After Proposal
Sales ...........................................................................................
$20,000
Less variable expenses ..................................................................
15,000
Contribution margin ......................................................................
5,000
Less fixed expenses ......................................................................
40,000
Net income...................................................................................
$ (35,000)
b. The expected total dollar amount of net income for next year would be:
Last year’s net income ..................................................................
$28,000
Expected increase in net income next year
(150% × $28,000) ....................................................................
42,000
Total expected net income ............................................................
$70,000
3. Cost-volume-profit graph:
Alternatively:
$150,000
= =12,500 units
$12 per unit
or, at $40 per unit, $500,000.
2. The contribution margin at the break-even point is $150,000 because at that point it
must equal the fixed expenses.
$18,000 + $150,000
= =14,000 units
$12 per unit
Total Unit
Sales (14,000 units × $40 per unit) ......................... $560,000 $40
Variable expenses
(14,000 units × $28 per unit) ............................... 392,000 28
Contribution margin
(14,000 units × $12 per unit) ............................... 168,000 $12
Fixed expenses ....................................................... 150,000
Net operating income .............................................. $ 18,000
Alternative solution:
$80,000 incremental sales × 30% CM ratio = $24,000
Given that the company’s fixed expenses will not change, monthly net
operating income will increase by the amount of the increased contribution margin,
$24,000.
Alternative solution:
$135,000
= = 5,000 lanterns,
$27 per lantern
or at $90 per lantern, $450,000 in sales
Present: Proposed:
3. 8,000 Lanterns 10,000 Lanterns*
Total Per Unit Total Per Unit
Sales..................................... $720,000 $90 $810,000 $81 **
Variable expenses .................. 504,000 63 630,000 63
Contribution margin ............... 216,000 $27 180,000 $18
Fixed expenses ...................... 135,000 135,000
Net operating income............. $ 81,000 $ 45,000
Alternative solution:
$72,000 + $135,000
= = 11,500 lanterns
$18 per lantern
Alternative solution:
2.
New variable manufacturing cost = $8 × 1.1 = $8.80
New total variable cost = $8.80 + $4.00 = $12.80
1.
Total Per unit Percentage
Sales (32,000 units) $496,0002 $15.50 100.0
Less: variable costs (32,000 units)
344,000 10.751 69.4
Contribution margin $152,000 $ 4.75 30.6
Less: fixed costs 106,8751
Income $ 45,125
Alternative solution:
Old New
Fixed costs $115,000 $230,000
÷ Unit contribution margin $0.55 $1.10
= Break-even sales (units-rounded up) 209,091 209,091
1.
Old New
Fixed costs $240,000 $500,000
÷ Unit contribution margin* $8.00 $12.00
= Break-even sales (units-rounded up) 30,000 41,667
2.
3. The above computation was for point of indifference in sales units; we can
compute point of indifference in sales dollars as follows:
4. If demand is uncertain, the old machine represents less risk because of its lower
fixed costs. In this case, it is not the variable cost per unit that is reduced by the
new machine but rather the selling price per unit which has increased. However,
the effect is the same — the contribution margin per unit is increased with the
new machine at the “cost” of higher fixed costs. This is an example of operating
leverage. For every unit short of the break-even point, the new machine results
in a greater loss per unit, and for every unit past the break-even point, the new
machine results in a greater profit per unit. Also notice that the break-even
point is higher with the new machine than the old machine.
2.
Break-even point in = Fixed expenses
total sales dollars CM ratio
$180,000
= =$300,000 sales
0.60
4. a.
Contribution margin
Degree of operating leverage =
Net operating income
$216,000
= =6
$36,000
b. 6 × 15% = 90% increase in net operating income. In dollars, this increase would
be 90% × $36,000 = $32,400.
$90,000
= = 15,000 units
$6 per unit
$90,000
= = $300,000 in sales
0.30
2. Incremental contribution margin:
$70,000 increased sales × 30% CM ratio ....................... $21,000
Less increased fixed costs:
Increased advertising cost ............................................. 8,000
Increase in monthly net operating income ......................... $13,000
Since the company presently has a loss of $9,000 per month, if the changes are
adopted, the loss will turn into a profit of $4,000 per month.
Alternative solution:
$4,500 + $90,000
=
$5.40 per unit**
= 17,500 units
**$6.00 – $0.60 = $5.40.
$208,000
= = 16,000 units
$13 per unit
$208,000
= = $320,000 in sales
0.65
b. Comparative income statements follow:
Not Automated Automated
Total Per Unit % Total Per Unit %
Sales (20,000 units) .......... $400,000 $20 100 $400,000 $20 100
Variable expenses ............. 280,000 14 70 140,000 7 35
Contribution margin .......... 120,000 $6 30 260,000 $13 65
Fixed expenses ................. 90,000 208,000
Net operating income ........ $ 30,000 $ 52,000
c. Whether or not one would recommend that the company automate its operations
depends on how much risk he or she is willing to take, and depends heavily on
prospects for future sales. The proposed changes would increase the company’s
fixed costs and its break-even point. However, the changes would also increase
the company’s CM ratio (from 30% to 65%). The higher CM ratio means that
once the break-even point is reached, profits will increase more rapidly than at
present. If 20,000 units are sold next month, for example, the higher CM ratio
will generate $22,000 more in profits than if no changes are made.
The greatest risk of automating is that future sales may drop back down to
present levels (only 13,500 units per month), and as a result, losses will be even
larger than at present due to the company’s greater fixed costs. (Note the
problem states that sales are erratic from month to month.) In sum, the
proposed changes will help the company if sales continue to trend upward in
future months; the changes will hurt the company if sales drop back down to or
near present levels.
Note to the Instructor: Although it is not asked for in the problem, if time permits
you may want to compute the point of indifference between the two alternatives
in terms of units sold; i.e., the point where profits will be the same under either
alternative. At this point, total revenue will be the same; hence, we include only
costs in our equation:
Let Q = Point of indifference in units sold
$14Q + $90,000 = $7Q + $208,000
$7Q = $118,000
Q = $118,000 ÷ $7 per unit
Q = 16,857 units (rounded)
If more than 16,857 units are sold, the proposed plan will yield the greatest
profit; if less than 16,857 units are sold, the present plan will yield the greatest profit
(or the least loss).
2.
$700
$600
Total Sales Revenue
Break-Even Point:
$500 12,500 pairs of shoes or
Total Dollars (000s)
Total Fixed
$200 Expenses
$100
$0
0
00
00
00
00
00
50
00
50
,0
,5
,0
,5
,0
2,
5,
7,
10
12
15
17
20
4. The variable expenses will now be $18.75 per pair, and the contribution margin will
be $11.25 per pair.
Sales = Variable expenses + Fixed expenses + Profits
$30.00Q = $18.75Q + $150,000 + $0
$11.25Q = $150,000
Q = $150,000 ÷ $11.25 per pair
Q = 13,334 pairs (rounded up)
13,334 pairs × $30.00 per pair = $400,020 in sales
Alternative solution:
Although the change will lower the break-even point from 12,500 pairs to 11,000
pairs, the company must consider whether this reduction in the break-even point is
more than offset by the possible loss in sales arising from having the sales staff on a
salaried basis. Under a salary arrangement, the sales staff has less incentive to sell
than under the present commission arrangement, resulting in a potential loss of
sales and a reduction of profits. Although it is generally desirable to lower the break-
even point, management must consider the other effects of a change in the cost
structure. The break-even point could be reduced dramatically by doubling the
selling price but it does not necessarily follow that this would improve the company’s
profit.
2.
To break even, fixed costs should not exceed the contribution margin of $276,195.
Therefore,
Maximum cost of training = ($276,195 - $275,000) = $1,195
* With the training both materials and labour costs will reduce by $0.75, therefore, new
variable costs are $6.50 - $0.75 = $5.75.
1.
The Colony Range is so cared for and fertilized that the growing
pullet, for the Spring and Summer months, finds an unlimited supply
of succulent green food at her door.
CHAPTER XI
Anthracite Coal Ashes—A Substitute for Many
More Expensive Necessities
The feather of a bird is composed almost entirely of phosphorous,
and phosphorous is a great aid to the bird in digesting food. In fact,
there are manufactured “grits” offered on the market, which base
their efficiency on the amount of phosphorous they carry.
Anthracite, or hard, coal ashes, carry a considerable quantity of
phosphorous, and this is the reason chickens in all stages of their
existence are so fond of them. Our attention was first called to this
fact by observing the large number of pullets on the Colony Range,
where some loads of ashes had been used the previous season in
mixing with the fertilizer for the growing of potatoes. It was noticed
that these small heaps of ashes were very soon consumed, and
when they were replenished the pullets were never absent from the
piles. The experiment was then made of placing a small heap at the
extreme end of the chick runs from the Brooder House, and to our
surprise we found one was unable to see the ashes because of the
moving mass of yellow which covered them. It was necessary to
replenish these heaps almost daily. As ashes are perfectly sanitary
we decided to cover the entire chick run with them, which we did,
and every few days, through the brooding season, a fresh coating is
necessary, as the youngsters consume so much of the surface
constantly.
Orders for hatching eggs are booked by such a system that people
receive them when we agree to deliver the goods, and the illustration
herewith plainly shows the plan.
$ ........ SUNNY SLOPE FARM No.
THE GREAT CORNING EGG FARM
BREEDERS OF THE STRAIN OF S. C. WHITE LEGHORNS
WHICH CANNOT BE SURPASSED
BY ....................
CHAPTER XIII
Policing the Farm—With Bloodhounds,
Searchlights and Rifles
In the Fall of each year, from almost every part of the Country,
come reports of what seems to be organized thieving in the poultry
line. Both large and small farms are generally sufferers. For a
number of years people in the vicinity of the The Corning Egg Farm
have met with losses, and in the year 1910 an organized gang was
unearthed, which had a camp on the adjacent hills, and made nightly
raids, then shipped the birds by crossing the Watchung Mountains
and reaching railroad communication on the other side, sending their
stolen feathered plunder into the New York Market.