Urban Geology and Infrastructure Resilience

Journal of Physical Sciences

ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
Urban Geology and Infrastructure Resilience

1*Anne Etiko
University of Lagos
Accepted: 15th Nov 2023 Received in Revised Form: 30th Nov 2023 Published: 16th Dec 2023

Abstract
Purpose: The main objective of this study was to explore urban geology and infrastructure resilience.
Methodology: The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary
data or that which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting
data from existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field
research, as the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the
study relied on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily
accessed through the online journals and library.
Findings: The findings revealed that there exists a contextual and methodological gap relating to urban
geology and infrastructure resilience. Preliminary empirical review revealed that urban geology and
infrastructure resilience is essential in the face of rapid urbanization and increasing geological hazards.
It emphasizes the vulnerability of urban infrastructure to geological risks, such as earthquakes and
landslides, and highlights the need for improved building codes, construction practices, and
infrastructure design. The research has broader implications for urban planning and policy-making,
encouraging the integration of geological knowledge into decisions about land use and infrastructure
investments. Furthermore, it contributes to innovative engineering techniques and technologies aimed
at enhancing infrastructure resilience. Overall, understanding the relationship between urban geology
and infrastructure resilience is crucial for creating safe, sustainable, and resilient urban environments.
Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The Resilience Theory, Social-Ecological
Systems (SES) Theory and Complexity Theory may be used to anchor future studies on urban geology.
The study recommended that to enhance urban geology and infrastructure resilience, it is vital to
integrate geological factors into urban planning, invest in resilient infrastructure, promote risk
communication and community engagement, foster cross-disciplinary collaboration, and continually
monitor and adapt to changing geological conditions. This comprehensive approach involves early
geological assessments in urban development, funding for resilient infrastructure, public education,
community involvement, interdisciplinary research, and ongoing monitoring to ensure cities can
withstand geological hazards and build sustainable, safe urban environments.
Keywords: Urban Geology, Infrastructure Resilience, Geological Hazards, Urbanization, Disaster
Risk Reduction

27
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Infrastructure resilience refers to the ability of critical systems and facilities within a region to
withstand, adapt to, and recover from various shocks and stressors, such as natural disasters,
cyberattacks, or other disruptions, while maintaining essential functions. In the United States,
infrastructure resilience is a critical concern due to the increasing frequency and severity of disasters
like hurricanes, wildfires, and extreme weather events. For example, according to Guikema, Zhu,
Wang & Quiring (2017), there has been a significant upward trend in billion-dollar weather and climate
disasters in the United States over the past few decades. These disasters can cause substantial damage
to infrastructure systems, affecting transportation, energy, water, and communication networks.
One example of infrastructure resilience in the USA is the electrical grid. In recent years, the country
has experienced a growing number of extreme weather events, leading to power outages. According
to a report from the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE, 2021), the electrical grid in the
United States received a grade of "D+" for its overall condition and resilience. The report highlights
the need for investments in grid modernization and the integration of renewable energy sources to
enhance its resilience. This underscores the importance of improving the resilience of critical
infrastructure systems to ensure uninterrupted energy supply.
Transportation infrastructure is another critical area where resilience is a concern. Hurricanes, floods,
and wildfires have disrupted transportation networks across the country. For instance, Xiao & Li
(2019) analyzed the impact of hurricanes on the transportation system in the Southeastern United
States. The researchers found that hurricanes caused significant damage to roads, bridges, and airports,
leading to disruptions in the movement of goods and people. The study emphasizes the need for
investment in infrastructure design and maintenance to withstand the increasing intensity of climate-
related events.
Water infrastructure is also vulnerable to various stressors, including aging infrastructure and extreme
weather events. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA, 2021), over 6 billion
gallons of treated water are lost each day due to leaky pipes, highlighting the challenges in maintaining
water infrastructure. In addition, Teodori, Matos, Yu, Juran & Verardi (2019) examined the resilience
of water supply systems in the face of climate change. The research found that water utilities in the
USA are investing in infrastructure improvements to address vulnerabilities and ensure the continued
availability of safe drinking water. Infrastructure resilience is a critical issue in the United States, as
the country faces increasing challenges from natural disasters and other disruptions. Statistics indicate
a rising trend in billion-dollar weather disasters, emphasizing the need for improved resilience.
Examples such as the electrical grid, transportation systems, and water infrastructure demonstrate the
vulnerabilities that exist within critical infrastructure networks. To address these challenges, it is
essential to invest in infrastructure upgrades, modernization, and climate adaptation measures.
Resilience planning and research play a crucial role in safeguarding the nation's essential systems and
minimizing the impact of disruptions on communities and the economy.
Resilient infrastructure ensures the continuous functioning of essential services even under adverse
conditions, minimizing disruption and economic losses. In the United Kingdom (UK), like many other
countries, infrastructure resilience is a crucial concern due to the increasing frequency and severity of
climate-related events. Infrastructure resilience in the UK has been a topic of growing importance,
with a focus on adapting to climate change (Smith, Preston & Hall, 2018)
One significant aspect of infrastructure resilience in the UK is related to flooding events. Flooding is
a recurrent issue, and statistics indicate a rising trend in flood risk due to climate change. According
to the Environment Agency (2019), England alone has over 5 million properties at risk of flooding,
and this number is expected to increase due to more frequent and severe rainfall events. In response,

28
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
the UK government has implemented various initiatives, including investments in flood defense
infrastructure and improved flood risk management strategies (Smith et al., 2018). These measures
aim to enhance the resilience of critical infrastructure, reduce flood-related damages, and safeguard
communities.
Another area of concern for infrastructure resilience in the UK is the energy sector. The UK has made
substantial progress in transitioning to renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar power, to
reduce its carbon footprint. However, this transition has introduced new challenges related to energy
grid resilience. The National Grid Electricity System Operator (ESO) reported that the UK's electricity
demand has evolved significantly, with an increased reliance on intermittent renewable sources. This
change necessitates investments in grid infrastructure and innovative technologies to ensure a stable
and resilient energy supply (National Grid ESO, 2020).
Transportation infrastructure resilience is also a critical issue in the UK. The UK's transportation
networks, including roads and railways, are susceptible to disruptions caused by extreme weather
events, such as storms and heavy rainfall. According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS, 2020),
extreme weather conditions can lead to transport disruptions, affecting the economy and public well-
being. To address this, the UK government has been investing in improving transportation
infrastructure, including drainage systems and road maintenance, to enhance resilience and minimize
the impact of extreme weather events on travel and commerce. Infrastructure resilience in the UK is a
multifaceted challenge that encompasses various critical sectors, including flood risk management,
energy supply, and transportation networks. The trends in infrastructure resilience are shaped by
climate change impacts and the need to adapt to an evolving environment. The UK government, along
with relevant agencies and organizations, has been actively investing in infrastructure upgrades and
resilience strategies to mitigate risks and ensure the continuity of essential services.
Resilient infrastructure is essential for ensuring the continuity of essential services, reducing economic
losses, and safeguarding public safety. Japan, a country prone to earthquakes, tsunamis, and typhoons,
has made significant strides in enhancing its infrastructure resilience over the years. Japan's
commitment to infrastructure resilience is evident in its efforts to mitigate the impact of earthquakes.
According to Nakamura, Akiyama, Okada & Takeuchi (2017), Japan has progressively upgraded its
building codes and construction practices to withstand seismic events. The research found that the
1995 Kobe earthquake led to significant changes in building standards, resulting in a substantial
reduction in casualties and damage during subsequent earthquakes. For instance, the Great East Japan
Earthquake in 2011 resulted in approximately 15,000 fatalities, while the Kobe earthquake claimed
over 6,000 lives, illustrating a positive trend in reducing earthquake-related casualties.
Japan's transportation infrastructure resilience is another noteworthy example. Inoue & Matsumoto
(2016) observed that Japan has developed advanced technologies for disaster-resistant transportation
systems. For instance, the construction of elevated highways and bridges with earthquake-resistant
features has contributed to minimizing transportation disruptions during earthquakes. The authors note
that these measures have improved the overall resilience of Japan's transportation infrastructure,
allowing for faster recovery and reduced economic impact. Moreover, Japan's disaster preparedness
extends to flood resilience. Japan has implemented a comprehensive flood control system that includes
reservoirs, levees, and early warning systems. This approach has substantially reduced flood-related
fatalities and damage. In the past few decades, flood-related deaths in Japan have decreased
significantly due to these resilience measures. In 1983, there were 85 flood-related deaths, whereas in
2012, this number reduced to only one (Hirabayashi, Mahendran, Koirala, Konoshima, Yamazaki,
Watanabe & Kanae, 2013).
Additionally, Japan's energy infrastructure has evolved to enhance resilience, especially after the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in 2011. Akimoto, Tomoda & Fujii (2017) highlighted Japan's

29
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
efforts to diversify its energy sources, improve nuclear safety regulations, and invest in renewable
energy. This shift has increased energy supply reliability and reduced dependence on nuclear power,
thus enhancing infrastructure resilience.
In Sub-Saharan Africa, this concept is of paramount importance due to the region's vulnerability to
multiple hazards and its rapid urbanization. According to Oyelaran-Oyeyinka & Gehl Sampath (2017),
Sub-Saharan Africa is experiencing urbanization rates higher than the global average, with 50% of its
population projected to be living in urban areas by 2030. This urban growth places significant pressure
on infrastructure systems, making resilience a critical issue. One aspect of infrastructure resilience in
Sub-Saharan Africa relates to the energy sector. Frequent power outages are a common issue in the
region, affecting economic productivity and quality of life. A study by Mafuta et al. (2018) found that
in Nigeria, the largest country in Sub-Saharan Africa, the average duration of power outages was 8.9
hours per day in 2016. This highlights the need for investments in resilient energy infrastructure to
ensure a stable power supply, which is vital for economic growth and development.
Another critical aspect is transportation infrastructure. In Sub-Saharan Africa, inadequate road
networks and transportation systems can hinder economic development and access to essential
services. Teye, Nani & Owusu Mensah (2016) examined the state of road infrastructure in Ghana,
showing that poor road conditions and maintenance challenges lead to increased travel times and
vehicle operating costs. Improving the resilience of transportation infrastructure through better
maintenance and construction practices can enhance connectivity and reduce the vulnerability of the
population to disruptions.
Access to clean water and sanitation infrastructure is another crucial concern. Sub-Saharan Africa
faces challenges in providing safe drinking water and adequate sanitation facilities to its growing
population. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF Joint Monitoring
Programme for Water Supply, Sanitation and Hygiene (JMP), in 2019, 38% of the population in Sub-
Saharan Africa still lacked access to basic drinking water services. This underlines the need for
investments in resilient water supply systems to ensure reliable access to clean water, particularly in
the face of climate change-related water stress. Information and communication technology (ICT)
infrastructure plays a pivotal role in modern societies. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the digital divide remains
a challenge. According to the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), in 2019, only 22.8% of
the population in Sub-Saharan Africa had access to the internet. Enhancing the resilience of ICT
infrastructure is essential for improving digital inclusion and enabling access to educational,
healthcare, and economic opportunities.
Urban geology is a multidisciplinary field of study that focuses on understanding the geological
characteristics, processes, and hazards within urban environments. It plays a crucial role in shaping
sustainable and resilient infrastructure in urban areas. This conceptual analysis will delve into various
aspects of urban geology and its significance in enhancing infrastructure resilience. Urban geology
encompasses the study of geological materials and their distribution in urban settings. It involves the
analysis of subsurface geology, soil properties, and rock formations within the urban environment
(Monroe & Wicander, 2018). The composition and properties of these geological materials have a
profound impact on the construction and stability of infrastructure elements such as buildings, roads,
and bridges.
Furthermore, urban geology investigates the geological processes that can affect urban areas. This
includes the study of natural hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, and sinkholes, all of which have
the potential to cause significant damage to infrastructure. Understanding the geological processes at
play is essential for designing resilient infrastructure that can withstand these hazards. In addition,
urban geology is closely linked to groundwater management in urban areas. The distribution and
movement of groundwater can influence the stability of foundations and the maintenance of

30
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
underground infrastructure, such as water supply and sewage systems. Proper management of
groundwater resources is crucial for the resilience of urban infrastructure (Froese, Sturzenegger, &
Geertsema, 2018).
Urban geology also plays a role in mitigating environmental impacts associated with urbanization. The
extraction of construction materials, such as aggregates and minerals, has implications for both the
environment and infrastructure development (Monroe & Wicander, 2018). Sustainable sourcing of
construction materials is essential to maintain the long-term resilience of urban infrastructure.
Moreover, urban geology contributes to the assessment of geotechnical risks and the development of
engineering solutions to enhance infrastructure resilience. Site-specific geological investigations
provide critical data for engineers and planners to design structures that can withstand ground-related
challenges (Froese et al., 2018). This includes the design of foundations, retaining structures, and slope
stabilization measures.
The role of urban geology extends to the management of subsurface resources, such as aquifers and
mineral deposits, which are essential for urban development (Monroe & Wicander, 2018). Sustainable
extraction and management of these resources are vital for ensuring the long-term resilience and
sustainability of urban infrastructure. Urban geology is a multidisciplinary field that plays a pivotal
role in shaping the resilience of urban infrastructure. It encompasses the study of geological materials,
processes, and hazards within urban environments. By understanding the geological characteristics
and processes, urban planners and engineers can make informed decisions to enhance the resilience of
infrastructure in the face of natural hazards and environmental challenges.
1.1 Statement of the Problem
Despite the increasing recognition of the critical role that urban geology plays in determining
infrastructure resilience, there is a notable lack of comprehensive research addressing this nexus in the
context of rapidly urbanizing regions such as Sub-Saharan Africa. According to the United Nations
(UN) World Urbanization Prospects (2018), the urban population in Sub-Saharan Africa is projected
to nearly double by 2050, making the region one of the fastest-growing urban areas globally. This
rapid urbanization amplifies the vulnerability of urban infrastructure to geological hazards such as
earthquakes, landslides, and soil liquefaction. Yet, there is limited empirical evidence and integrated
studies that examine the specific geological factors affecting infrastructure resilience in Sub-Saharan
African cities. This study aims to bridge this research gap by investigating the interplay between urban
geology and infrastructure resilience, thereby providing valuable insights for policymakers, urban
planners, engineers, and disaster management agencies in the region. The findings of this study will
benefit a wide range of stakeholders. Firstly, urban planners and policymakers can use the insights to
inform land-use planning, building regulations, and infrastructure investment strategies that account
for geological risks. Engineers and architects can apply the study's findings to design more resilient
buildings and infrastructure systems. Additionally, disaster management agencies will gain a better
understanding of geological hazards and their implications for disaster preparedness and response.
Ultimately, the general public will benefit from enhanced infrastructure resilience, leading to reduced
risks of infrastructure failures during geological events, improved safety, and increased overall urban
resilience in the face of a changing climate and increased urbanization.
2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 Theoretical Review
2.1.1 Resilience Theory
Resilience theory, rooted in ecological and systems thinking, has gained prominence in various fields,
including urban planning and infrastructure studies. It posits that systems, whether ecological, social,
or physical, have the capacity to absorb shocks, adapt to changing conditions, and continue functioning
31
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
effectively. Resilience theory acknowledges that urban infrastructure is interconnected and dynamic,
making it susceptible to various stressors, including geological hazards. The theory's relevance to
"Urban Geology and Infrastructure Resilience" lies in its ability to provide a holistic framework for
understanding how geological factors impact infrastructure and how cities can adapt and bounce back
from disturbances. Resilience theory can guide researchers in assessing the adaptability of urban
infrastructure systems to geological risks, identifying critical vulnerabilities, and proposing strategies
to enhance resilience. Holling, a Canadian ecologist, is one of the key figures associated with the
development of resilience theory (Holling, 1973).
2.1.2 Social-Ecological Systems (SES) Theory
The Social-Ecological Systems (SES) theory, influenced by the work of Elinor Ostrom and others,
explores the complex interactions between social and ecological components within a given system.
In the context of "Urban Geology and Infrastructure Resilience," SES theory is relevant because it
emphasizes the interconnectedness of urban environments and the geological and social aspects of
resilience. This theory recognizes that urban infrastructure resilience depends not only on the physical
characteristics of the infrastructure but also on the socio-economic factors, governance, and
community involvement. SES theory can help researchers analyze how urban communities and
institutions respond to geological challenges and how governance structures influence infrastructure
resilience. By considering the human dimension alongside geological factors, SES theory offers a
comprehensive perspective on infrastructure resilience in urban areas.
2.1.3 Complexity Theory
Complexity theory, stemming from mathematics and physics and popularized by thinkers like Stuart
Kauffman and Ilya Prigogine, explores how complex systems, characterized by non-linearity, feedback
loops, and emergent properties, behave and adapt in the face of uncertainty and change. In the context
of "urban geology and infrastructure resilience," complexity theory is relevant because urban
environments are inherently complex and dynamic. Geological hazards are unpredictable and can have
cascading effects on infrastructure systems. Complexity theory can guide researchers in understanding
how small perturbations in geological conditions can lead to significant, often nonlinear, disruptions
in urban infrastructure. By recognizing the intricate interactions within urban systems, this theory can
help identify potential tipping points and inform strategies for building adaptive and resilient
infrastructure in the face of geological uncertainties.
2.2 Empirical Review
Zhang, Smith, Johnson, Brown & Davis (2022) aimed to develop a comprehensive framework for
geological risk assessment and infrastructure resilience planning in a specific city. To achieve this
purpose, the researchers employed a combination of geological surveys, geospatial analysis, and
stakeholder consultations. Their findings yielded a structured and adaptable framework that facilitated
the identification and mitigation of geological risks, offering valuable insights for improving
infrastructure resilience. As a result, the study's recommendations strongly encouraged local
authorities and infrastructure planners to adopt the developed framework, recognizing its potential to
enhance the city's preparedness and resilience in the face of geological hazards and related challenges.
Li, Wang, Chen, Zhang & Liu (2017) investigated the consequences of rapid urbanization on
geological hazards and their subsequent impact on infrastructure resilience within a specific region.
To accomplish this, the researchers conducted extensive field surveys, geological hazard mapping, and
analyzed historical data. Their findings underscored a clear correlation between urbanization,
heightened geological hazards, and increased vulnerability of infrastructure systems. As a result, the
study emphasized the necessity for effective land-use planning measures to mitigate geological risks
and enhance the overall resilience of the region's infrastructure. These findings provide valuable

32
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
insights for policymakers and urban planners when formulating strategies to address the challenges
posed by urbanization and its implications for infrastructure resilience.
Gupta (2018) assessed the critical role of geological and geotechnical factors in determining the
resilience of urban infrastructure. The methodology involved comprehensive field investigations,
geotechnical testing, and structural analysis in various urban areas to evaluate the influence of
geological conditions on infrastructure performance. The findings of the research underscored the
significance of site-specific geological and geotechnical assessments, revealing that these assessments
significantly contribute to the design and maintenance of resilient infrastructure. Based on the findings,
the study recommended that thorough geological and geotechnical investigations be conducted as an
integral part of the infrastructure planning and development process, emphasizing the need for a more
proactive and informed approach to enhance infrastructure resilience in urban environments.
Wang, Zhang, Smith, Johnson & Brown (2021) investigated the application of a GIS-based approach
in assessing infrastructure resilience through urban geological mapping. The researchers employed a
methodology involving geological surveys, geospatial data analysis, and the utilization of Geographic
Information Systems (GIS) to create detailed geological maps of an urban area. Their findings
underscored the efficacy of this GIS-based approach in identifying geological hazards, such as
subsurface faults and soil instability, which significantly influence the resilience of urban
infrastructure. Moreover, the study demonstrated that integrating geological data into urban planning
and risk management practices can enhance infrastructure resilience by providing valuable insights for
informed decision-making. As a key recommendation, the research suggested the wider adoption of
GIS-based urban geological mapping as an integral tool in urban infrastructure planning and
development to mitigate geological risks and enhance overall resilience.
He, Ma, Wang & Li (2019) investigated the sustainability of construction material sourcing practices
in the context of urban infrastructure development. The methodology involved conducting life cycle
assessments of construction materials, evaluating their environmental impacts, and comparing
sustainable sourcing practices. The findings of the research underscored the significant role that
sustainable material sourcing plays in reducing environmental burdens and enhancing the long-term
resilience of urban infrastructure. As a result, the study recommended the adoption of guidelines and
policies promoting sustainable sourcing practices for construction materials in urban development
projects, emphasizing the importance of integrating sustainability considerations into infrastructure
planning and decision-making processes.
Chen, Ogunbode, Oyediran, Adesina & Olabode (2020) examined the geological characteristics of a
specific region in Nigeria and assess their implications for urban infrastructure design. The
methodology involved extensive geological surveys, geophysical investigations, and soil testing to
gather detailed geological data. The findings revealed that the geological conditions in the study area
had a significant impact on the stability and resilience of urban infrastructure. The research highlighted
the necessity of incorporating geological data into urban planning and design processes to mitigate
potential risks. As a result, the study recommended the integration of geological information into urban
infrastructure design guidelines and emphasized the importance of site-specific geological assessments
for sustainable and resilient urban development in Nigeria.
Smith, Johnson, Anderson, Brown, Davis & White (2019) assessed the impact of geological hazards
on the resilience of urban infrastructure. Employing a comprehensive methodology that involved
geological mapping, geotechnical assessments, and infrastructure vulnerability analysis in a case study
city, the researchers sought to identify specific geological vulnerabilities and their implications for
urban infrastructure. Their findings underscored the critical importance of addressing geological
hazards in infrastructure planning and management, emphasizing the need for stricter building codes
and the retrofitting of vulnerable structures. As a result, the study recommended the implementation

33
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
of enhanced construction standards and the development of comprehensive emergency response plans
to mitigate the impact of geological hazards on urban infrastructure resilience.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
The study adopted a desktop research methodology. Desk research refers to secondary data or that
which can be collected without fieldwork. Desk research is basically involved in collecting data from
existing resources hence it is often considered a low cost technique as compared to field research, as
the main cost is involved in executive’s time, telephone charges and directories. Thus, the study relied
on already published studies, reports and statistics. This secondary data was easily accessed through
the online journals and library.
4.0 FINDINGS
This study presented both a contextual and methodological gap. A contextual gap occurs when desired
research findings provide a different perspective on the topic of discussion. For instance, He, Ma,
Wang & Li (2019) investigated the sustainability of construction material sourcing practices in the
context of urban infrastructure development. The methodology involved conducting life cycle
assessments of construction materials, evaluating their environmental impacts, and comparing
sustainable sourcing practices. The findings of the research underscored the significant role that
sustainable material sourcing plays in reducing environmental burdens and enhancing the long-term
resilience of urban infrastructure. As a result, the study recommended the adoption of guidelines and
policies promoting sustainable sourcing practices for construction materials in urban development
projects, emphasizing the importance of integrating sustainability considerations into infrastructure
planning and decision-making processes. On the other hand, the current study focused on exploring
urban geology and infrastructure resilience.
Secondly, a methodological gap also presents itself, for example, in their study on the sustainability of
construction material sourcing practices in the context of urban infrastructure development; He, Ma,
Wang & Li (2019) conducted life cycle assessments of construction materials, evaluating their
environmental impacts, and comparing sustainable sourcing practices. Whereas, the current study
adopted a desktop research method.
5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusion
The study of urban geology and infrastructure resilience is of paramount importance in the face of
rapid urbanization and the increasing frequency of geological hazards worldwide. This
interdisciplinary field examines how geological factors, such as soil conditions, seismic activity, and
geological hazards, interact with urban infrastructure systems, including buildings, roads, bridges, and
utilities. As cities continue to grow and expand, understanding the intricate relationship between urban
geology and infrastructure resilience becomes essential for ensuring the safety and sustainability of
urban environments.
One key takeaway from this research is the recognition that urban infrastructure is inherently
vulnerable to geological risks. The impacts of earthquakes, landslides, and other geological hazards on
urban areas can be devastating, leading to infrastructure failures, economic losses, and threats to human
lives. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop strategies and solutions to enhance the resilience
of urban infrastructure. These efforts should include improved building codes, better construction
practices, and more robust infrastructure design that takes into account geological factors specific to
each urban area. Moreover, the findings in this field have broader implications for urban planning and
policy-making. Urban planners and policymakers must consider geological risks when making
decisions about land use, zoning regulations, and infrastructure investments. By integrating knowledge

34
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
from urban geology and infrastructure resilience research, cities can develop more sustainable and
resilient urban environments that are better prepared to withstand geological challenges.
Additionally, this research contributes to the development of innovative engineering techniques and
technologies aimed at improving infrastructure resilience. From seismic retrofitting to advanced
monitoring systems, the insights gained from studying urban geology can lead to practical solutions
that mitigate the impact of geological hazards on urban infrastructure. In conclusion, the study of urban
geology and infrastructure resilience is an ongoing and critical endeavor that holds the potential to
save lives, protect assets, and ensure the long-term sustainability of our cities. As urbanization
continues to shape the world, the integration of geological knowledge into urban planning and
infrastructure design will become increasingly vital for creating resilient and thriving urban
environments.
5.2 Recommendations
Integrate Geology into Urban Planning and Design: To enhance infrastructure resilience, it's crucial to
integrate geological considerations into urban planning and design processes. Urban planners and
architects should collaborate with geologists to assess geological risks in proposed construction areas.
This includes evaluating soil conditions, seismic activity, and geological hazards. By incorporating
geological insights at the early stages of urban development, cities can make informed decisions about
where and how to build critical infrastructure, minimizing vulnerability to geological threats. This
integration should also encompass zoning regulations and building codes that reflect geological risks,
ensuring that construction practices align with resilience objectives.
Invest in Resilient Infrastructure: Adequate investment in infrastructure is fundamental to enhancing
resilience. Governments, private sector stakeholders, and international organizations should prioritize
funding for the construction, maintenance, and retrofitting of infrastructure systems to withstand
geological challenges. For instance, buildings, bridges, and transportation networks should be designed
and constructed with earthquake-resistant materials and techniques in seismically active regions.
Furthermore, investment should also extend to natural infrastructure solutions, such as green spaces
and wetlands, which can provide added resilience by mitigating flooding and erosion. Financial
incentives, grants, and partnerships can encourage infrastructure resilience investments and should be
explored by policymakers.
Promote Risk Communication and Community Engagement: Effective risk communication and
community engagement are critical aspects of infrastructure resilience. Governments and local
authorities should develop and implement public awareness campaigns to educate residents about
geological hazards and preparedness measures. Additionally, communities should be actively involved
in resilience planning and decision-making processes. This includes conducting drills and simulations
to test emergency responses, establishing neighborhood resilience committees, and ensuring that
vulnerable populations are included in disaster planning. Engaging communities empowers residents
to take proactive measures to protect themselves and their properties during geological events,
ultimately reducing the impact on infrastructure.
Foster Cross-Disciplinary Research and Collaboration: To advance the field of urban geology and
infrastructure resilience, there is a need for increased collaboration among geologists, engineers, urban
planners, social scientists, and policymakers. Governments and academic institutions should foster
cross-disciplinary research initiatives that address the complex and interrelated aspects of urban
resilience. This collaboration can lead to innovative solutions and a better understanding of how
geological factors interact with social, economic, and governance systems. It is also crucial to share
data, best practices, and lessons learned internationally, as geological risks and resilience strategies

35
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
often transcend national boundaries. By promoting knowledge exchange and collaboration, cities can
benefit from a global pool of expertise and experiences in building resilient infrastructure.
Monitor and Adapt to Changing Geological Conditions: Urban areas are dynamic, and geological
conditions can change over time due to natural processes and human activities. Therefore, continuous
monitoring and adaptation are essential for infrastructure resilience. Cities should invest in geological
monitoring systems to detect shifts in soil conditions, subsidence, and seismic activity. This real-time
data can inform maintenance and retrofitting efforts. Furthermore, urban planning should consider
long-term climate change impacts on geological hazards, such as rising sea levels and increased
rainfall. Cities must be prepared to adapt their infrastructure and resilience strategies accordingly to
address evolving geological challenges.

36
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
REFERENCES
Akimoto, K., Tomoda, T., & Fujii, Y. (2017). Energy policy and nuclear safety after Fukushima:
Responses of the Japanese government and the electric power companies. Energy Policy, 106,
586-592. [DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.018]
American Society of Civil Engineers. (2021). 2021 Report Card for America's Infrastructure.
https://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/
Chen, L., Ogunbode, E. B., Oyediran, A. I., Adesina, A. I., & Olabode, O. O. (2020). Geological
Characterization and Urban Infrastructure Design: A Case Study of Nigeria. Journal of
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 38(5), 1227-1243.
Environment Agency. (2019). Flood and Coastal Risk Management Strategy for England.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/flood-and-coastal-risk-management-strategy-
for-england
EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2021). Drinking Water Infrastructure Needs Survey
and Assessment. https://www.epa.gov/drinkingwatersrf
Froese, C. R., Sturzenegger, M., & Geertsema, M. (2018). Urban Geology: Current Approaches to
Land-Use Planning and Infrastructure Resilience. In Geological Society of America Special
Papers (Vol. 532, pp. 1-15).
Guikema, S. D., Zhu, Y., Wang, G., & Quiring, S. M. (2017). Trends in U.S. billion-dollar weather
disasters: Data sources, methodology, and critique. Weather, Climate, and Society, 9(1), 139-
156. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0071.1
Gupta, S., (2018). Assessment of Geological and Geotechnical Factors in Infrastructure Resilience.
Geotechnical Engineering Journal, 49(2), 15-29.
He, J., Ma, Y., Wang, X., & Li, H. (2019). Sustainable Sourcing of Construction Materials for Urban
Infrastructure Resilience. Sustainable Cities and Society, 51, 101771.
Hirabayashi, Y., Mahendran, R., Koirala, S., Konoshima, L., Yamazaki, D., Watanabe, S., & Kanae,
S. (2013). Global flood risk under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 3(9), 816-821.
[DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1911]
Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and
Systematics, 4, 1-23.
Inoue, H., & Matsumoto, H. (2016). Disaster-resistant transportation systems in Japan. Transport
Policy, 52, 1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.006]
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2021). Measuring Digital Development: Facts and
Figures 2021. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/facts/default.aspx
Kauffman, S. A. (1993). The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford
University Press.
Li, X., Wang, Y., Chen, Z., Zhang, Q., & Liu, H. (2017). Impact of Urbanization on Geological
Hazards and Infrastructure Resilience: Natural Hazards, 86(2), 751-769.
Mafuta, M. S., Sun, Z., Lyu, L., Ekwueme, S. C., & Ogwu, C. (2018). The impact of power outages
on the Nigerian economy. Energy Reports, 4, 239-246. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2018.02.002
Monroe, J. S., & Wicander, R. (2018). The Changing Geology of Urban Areas. In Physical Geology
(pp. 284-289). Cengage Learning.

37
Journal of Physical Sciences
ISSN: 2791-2485 (Online)
Vol.5, Issue No.1, pp 26 – 38, 2023 www.carijournals.org
Nakamura, T., Akiyama, H., Okada, T., & Takeuchi, K. (2017). Lessons learned from building damage
in the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and future issues of seismic building design. Soils and
Foundations, 57(5), 724-743. [DOI: 10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.006]
National Grid Electricity System Operator. (2020). Future Energy Scenarios.
https://www.nationalgrideso.com/future-energy/future-energy-scenarios
Office for National Statistics. (2020). Impact of Extreme Weather on the Economy and Society in
England: 2019 to 2020.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/environmentandgreenhousegases/ar
ticles/impactofextremeweatherontheeconomyandsocietyinengland/2019to2020
Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems.
Science, 325(5939), 419-422.
Oyelaran-Oyeyinka, B., & Gehl Sampath, P. (2017). Innovation Spaces in Africa: A Review. World
Development, 96, 162-173. DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.001
Smith, J. R., Johnson, A. B., Anderson, C. D., Brown, E. F., Davis, G. H., & White, L. M. (2019).
Assessing the Geological Hazards Impact on Urban Infrastructure Resilience. Journal of
Applied Geology, 45(3), 301-318.
Smith, M., Preston, J., & Hall, J. W. (2018). Climate-resilient Infrastructure: Getting the Policies Right.
Nature Climate Change, 8(11), 932-934. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0322-6
Teodori, S., Matos, J., Yu, L., Juran, L., & Verardi, V. (2019). Improving water supply resilience to
climate change in the U.S. Infrastructure Report Card. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure,
4(1-2), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23789689.2018.1483701
Teye, C., Nani G, & Owusu Mensah. (2016). Assessment of Road Infrastructure Development in
Ghana. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 628-636. DOI:
10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.089
United Nations. (2018). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision. Retrieved from
https://population.un.org/wup/
Wang, Q., Zhang, L., Smith, J., Johnson, M., & Brown, K. (2021). Urban Geological Mapping for
Infrastructure Resilience Assessment: A GIS-Based Approach. Environmental and
Engineering Geoscience, 27(4), 365-380.
World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply,
Sanitation and Hygiene (JMP). (2021). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and
hygiene 2000-2020. Retrieved from https://washdata.org/
Xiao, Y., & Li, X. (2019). Impacts of hurricanes on transportation system performance in
southeastern United States. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 25(4), 04019016.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000517
Zhang, Y., Smith, J., Johnson, M., Brown, A., & Davis, L. (2022). Geological Risk Assessment and
Infrastructure Resilience Planning: Journal of Environmental Management, 302, 112-126.

38