good? These can also improvise the topic, because art at its end, must be beautiful and good. First and foremost, the word art can be used as a compliment, whether it be in images, athletes, rhythmic movements and many more. Let’s discuss art in point of views that are subjective and objective. The prior will always lead us to the conclusion that art is always beautiful. As it was shown in the video, it’s just like comparing the infamous Monalisa to some random stick figure drawing,” the beauty is in the eye of the beholder” from which the possessor may tell that they are just both the same, but Leonardo’s masterpiece is more to have a value. Yet we cannot limit art to such ideas because of its versatility, this is where we discuss art in an objective point of view. The German poet Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, said that an art to be good, must possess answers to the questions: What was the goal? Did they achieve it? And was it worth doing? The Seminary formation for example, is it an art? It depends if it qualifies in the standards I presented, Goethe says. The main goal of Seminary formation is to mold young boys to become Priests. This Grace that they have received are the reason why they act in Persona Christi, and this is and will always be worth the doing. These are reasons why things are to be an art, their beauty and goodness lies with-in. This just leaves me the question, is this reflection paper an art?