DM No. 587, S. 2023 2023 Schools Division Office of Leyte Search For Most Outstanding Officials I Employees I Schools

Republic of the Philippines
Department of Education
REGION VIII – EASTERN VISAYAS
SCHOOLS DIVISION OF LEYTE
Page 1 of 429
Government Center, Candahug, Palo, Leyte
(053) 888-3527
leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph
Lead to Go, Love to Grow, Live to Glow . . .
Department of Education, Schools Division of Leyte
(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 2 of 429




Enclosure 2
2023 SDO LEYTE SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING

OFFICIALS/EMPLOYEES/SCHOOLS
TIMELINE OF ACTIVITIES
DATE ACTIVITY REMARKS EXPECTED OUTPUTS
June 06, PLANNING PRAISE Committee Validated guidelines and

2023 Consultative Meeting criteria for the awards;
• Assessment of the adopted/adapted
previous PASIDUNGOG
activities
• Plan for 2023
PRESTIGIO/
PASIDUNGOG activities
• Come up with
standards and
processes in evaluating
and validating the
nominees for the
awards; Adopt/adapt
DepEd RO 8 guidelines
June 6-22, Crafting and Finalization of PRAISE Crafted, finalized criteria,
2023 Criteria, mechanism and Committee/Secretariat/TWG standards for the different
processes for the different categories
categories identified (Special
Awards, Program
Coordinatorship) - attached
Presentation, review and PRAISE Reviewed, presented and

validation of criteria, Committee/Secretariat/TWG validated the criteria,
mechanism and processes of mechanisms and processes of
the different categories the different categories
identified (Special Awards,
Program Coordinatorship) -
attached
June 23,
2023 PRAISE Meeting for the PRAISE Committee/Secretariat Conducted PRAISE meeting of
validated criteria (Special criteria validated
Awards, Program
Coordinatorship) - attached
Issuance of Memorandum of PRAISE Committee Issued Memorandum:

the PASIDUNGOG Plan to the PRESTIGIO/ PASIDUNGOG
field 2023
June 27, Orientation on the 2023 PRAISE Committee/Secretariat Conducted orientation on the
2023 PRESTIGIO/ PASIDUNGOG & TWG PRESTIGIO/ PASIDUNGOG
Guidelines (PSDS, SHs, TWG, guidelines, standards and
Area/District Screening processes
Committee)- Hybrid Meeting

School level School PRAISE Committee Screened school level winners

screening/selection of school
level winners
District level District PRAISE Committee Screened district level winners

screening/selection of winners
Conduct selection procedure, District PRAISE Committee Identified the Nominees per
1st to 4th
nomination, evaluation and award category
week of July identify District level winners
Submission of Nominees by The Nomination Forms, List of Nominees from the

the District Level together with the required District
corresponding to each award documents and
category signed/approved overall
rating from the District PRAISE
Committee
August 01- Screening and shortlisting: PRAISE Screened qualified and

11, 2023 Evaluation of documents of Committee/Secretariat-SGOD- shortlisted nominees
nominees based on set criteria HRD
Shortlisting of Nominees
August 14- Onsite The qualified nominees shall Qualified nominees validated
25, 2023 validation/teleconferencing of undergo the validation through onsite/
the qualified and shortlisted process teleconferencing by the
nominees Division Evaluators/Validators
September Panel interview (5 minute PRAISE Panel Interview conducted

01-08, 2023 Video/Powerpoint Presentation Committee/Secretariat/TWG
of Work Skills of shortlisted
Nominees/Qualifiers)
2nd Week of Preparation, finalization and PRAISE Committee convenes Final results deliberated
September PRAISE Meeting and deliberates the results
2023
Last Week of Announcement of the PRAISE Committee Posted the results through
September qualified/finalist per award Meeting/Secretariat/TWG Memorandum re:
2023 category through Division announcement of winners
Memorandum Prepares logistics for the
awarding
TBA Conduct of PRESTIGIO/ Venue / TBA Conducted PRESTIGIO/

PASIDUNGOG Awarding PASIDUNGOG awarding
Ceremony ceremony
TBA Submission of Activity PRAISE Committee/Secretariat Submitted the Activity

Completion Report Completion Report

Enclosure 3
GUIDELINES FOR THE SELECTION PROCESS
1. General Conditions - The following conditions shall be followed:
A. Eligibility Requirements – The nominee for the Search must meet the following
qualification requirements:
1. A model of morality and integrity both in public and private life.
2. Has good human relations in the school, district, Schools Division

Office and in the community.
3. A permanent DepEd personnel who has rendered at least three (3)

years of continuous service as of the deadline of the submission of
nomination.
4. Has been rated “Outstanding” (4.50 and above) for the last three (3)
performance rating periods prior to the nomination.
5. Has no pending case and/or had not been found guilty of any
administrative, criminal, or civil case.
6. For personnel who availed of any scholarship or study grant which

required absence from station, the performance rating to be
considered shall be the recent rating available as stipulated in
Department Order No. 2, s. 2015.
7. There shall be a cut-off score of 70 points for all awards to qualify as

a nominee. The Division PRAISE Committee shall not receive any
nomination for nominees whose total score/point is below the cut-off
score.
B. Grounds for Disqualification
1. Nominees/candidates for any of the award shall have no pending case

and/or had not been found guilty of any administrative, criminal, or
civil case. Provided, that a pending case shall refer to any complaint
that has already gone through preliminary investigation and that a
formal charged has been filed against a candidate or nominee before a
competent tribunal. Provided, further, that a case that has already
been considered dismissed shall not disqualify a candidate or
nominee from participating in the screening process after submitting
a certification issued by the disciplining authority/proper court.
2. The Division PRAISE Committee may also revoke an award should the
winner be found to have committed falsification of documents
submitted.
3. Non-compliance with the submission of the complete documentary

requirements shall render the nominee ineligible for the Search.
4. Misrepresentation, bribery, and any form of special favors to the

Division PRAISE Committee shall be ground for disqualification.

2. Nomination Process – Nominations and selection shall come from each school, district
and functional division using the prescribed criteria in evaluating the candidates’ documents.
A nomination form shall be duly accomplished and all the other requirements, as reflected
on the list, shall be submitted to the school, district, and functional division. Attached to the
nomination shall be a documentation (pictorials, ACR, etc.) of the conduct of the school,
district, and functional division selection procedure. The school, district, functional division
with the highest score/rating shall be nominated to the Division PRAISE Committee. The
Division PRAISE Committee together with the Secretariat, Technical Working Group shall
review the documents of the nominees vis-à-vis the search criteria. The district and functional
division nominees shall be called for interview, demonstration and other mode of verification
or assessments (teleconferencing, face to face, video presentation, and others) conforming
with the health and safety protocols that fits to the situation of the place. The district and
functional division nominee with the highest Final Rating after the Validation and
Deliberation shall be named as the DIVISION AWARDEE.
3. Other Provisions
3.1 The Division PRAISE Committee shall deliberate on the consolidation of

results, by category. They shall signify on the Consolidated Rating Sheet, by
Category and shall treat with utmost confidentiality the final results of the
deliberation and strictly follow the scheduled timelines.
3.2 Validity of the outstanding/meritorious accomplishments and trainings shall be

within the last three (3) years (2020-2021, 2021-2022 and 2022-2023) set by
the Division PRAISE Committee
3.3 A Division Memo shall be issued to announce the Official Results of the Division
Selection process and shall be posted at the Division Office’s official website.
3.4 In case of a tie at any level, the Division PRAISE Committee shall refer to the
OPCRF/IPCRFs of the nominees. The nominee with the highest OPCRF/IPCRF
numerical rating gets the nomination/award. In case all nominees display the
same OPCRF/IPRF numerical rating, these will be broken down and resolved by
drawing lots or by toss coin.
3.5 Any member of the Division PRAISE Committee who is related to a nominee up to
the fourth degree of consanguinity and affinity shall inhibit himself/herself from
evaluating the documents and interviewing all candidates/nominees for the said
category.
3.6 In case of protest, the aggrieved party may file his/her protest within five (5) days
after the official result has been published/posted in the official website of the
School/District/Division PRAISE Committee. The School/District/Division
PRAISE Committee shall decide the protest within three (3) calendar days from
receipt of the protest.
3.7 A protest maybe withdrawn by the protestant anytime as a matter of right. The
withdrawal shall terminate the protest case.
3.8 Protest file beyond the prescribe period shall no longer be entertained.
3.9 The decision of the PRAISE Committee is final and executory. No motion for
reconsideration shall be entertained.
4. Required Nomination Documents – The Nomination Folder per Nominee shall contain
the following items:
4.1 Completely filled-out Nomination Form with 2” x 2” picture of the nominee
shall be accomplished by the immediate head.

4.2 Nominees updated and completely filled-out CS Form 212 Revised 2017 or
Personal Data Sheet.
4.3 Updated Service Record duly signed by the SDO Administrative Officer V
4.4 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) or Office

Performance Commitment and Review Form (OPCRF) for the last three (3)
performance rating periods in the same position that an employee is
nominated.
4.5 Has no pending case and/or had not been found guilty of any
administrative, criminal, or civil case.
4.6 Selection results duly signed by the PRAISE Committee at the School,
District and Division committee levels.
4.7 Duly certified means of verification (MOVs) for the awards, recognition,
participation, and other accomplishments by the School Head/Records
Officer/Division Chief as the case maybe. In no case shall the nominee
certify his/her MOVs.
4.8 Omnibus Certification of Authenticity and Veracity of Documents- This is a

legal document executed by the nominee swearing the authenticity and
veracity of the documents he/she submitted. This also authorizes the
Department of Education to verify the authenticity of his/her documents for
his or her application to the Division PRAISE Awards.
4.9 The nomination form and other documentary requirements should be

properly labeled.
5. Stages of the Search for Division PRAISE Awards – The Division PRAISE Committee
shall conduct a thorough evaluation and search for each category:
a. Screening, Evaluation of Documents, and Interview Stage
1. Nomination from the School/District - Each School/District shall

conduct its School/District Search for all applicable nominations re: Outstanding
School Teachers/Master Teachers, School Principals, Head Teachers, Teacher- in-
Charge, and other Personnel in the Level 2 and Level 1 positions, and Outstanding
School. Each School/District shall nominate its School/District awardees to the
Division PRAISE Committee for the Division Awards.
2. Nomination from the Functional Division - Each Functional Division

of the Schools Division Office (SDO) shall nominate its candidates for the Division
Awards, Special Awards and Coordinatorship Awards.
3. Validation and Interview – The Division PRAISE Committee shall

spearhead the evaluation and validation (document evaluation and interview)
submitted by all candidates who qualified for this stage.
If face-to-face interview is not possible, teleconferencing, and other online

modality shall be considered and be maximized to proceed with the screening and
evaluation. All data that shall be gathered shall be kept, secured, and stored. There
shall be measures to safeguard the data from collection to validation by obtaining
informed consent following the Data Privacy Act of 2012.
The Division PRAISE Committee shall evaluate the documents for any of the
categories with only one nominee provided he/she meets the cut-off score of 70.

The Division PRAISE Committee shall deliberate on the consolidation of

results, by category. They shall signify in the Consolidated Rating Sheet, by
Category and shall treat with utmost confidentiality the final results of the
deliberation which shall be declared during the Awarding Ceremony.
4. Publication of the Final Results, Awarding Ceremonies and

Submission of Division PRAISE Report
4.1 Conduct of the Awarding Ceremony – The Top Three (3) Division
Finalists for each of the categories are recognized and formally presented on
stage/virtually during the Awarding Ceremony. The Top Three (3) Finalists shall be
issued Certificate of Recognition, while the winner shall also receive a plaque.
4.2 Publication and Notification of Final Result – The official results of

the Division PRAISE Committee shall be disseminated through a Division
Memorandum which shall contain the names of the three (3) finalists per category
and this would serve as notice for them to attend the Awarding Ceremony where the
awardees shall be declared, Division Memo shall be issued announcing the official
final results of the Division PRAISE Committee.
4.3 Criteria and Standards – The evaluation of nominees’ documents for

Division PRAISE Awards, Search Criteria by Category (Enclosure No 7) shall be
used.
4.4 Criteria and Standards for other Division PRAISE Awards – the
criteria and standards for other Division PRAISE Awards such as Gawad Agad
Award shall be in accordance with the specific requirements as may be indicated in
the Certificate of Recognition which shall be presented during conferences, Division
Office celebrations, and other forms of assembly or division office
gathering/activities. These shall be consistent with applicable laws, rules and
regulations promulgated by competent authorities and/or as the Division PRAISE
Committee which may be prescribed by the Schools Division Superintendent.
4.5 Other Considerations – Other similar circumstances or considerations

in favor of the nominees, as may be determined by the Division PRAISE Committee
concerned duly approved by the Schools Division Superintendent.
4.6 Policy Review and Enhancement – the Division PRAISE Committee

shall meet within the quarter after the conduct of the Awarding Ceremony to
evaluate the Rewards and Recognition implementation of the division and review
the policy to continuously improve the process and its guidelines.

Enclosure 4
NOMINATION FORM
DepEd Schools Division of Leyte PRAISE Awards
2023
___________________
(Calendar Year)
Recent 2” x 2”
THE PRAISE COMMITTEE Picture of the
Schools Division of Leyte Nominee
Government Center, Candahug, Palo, Leyte
After undergoing a thorough evaluation of the guidelines and criteria of the set by the
DepEd SDO Leyte PRAISE Committee for Officials and Employees, I hereby nominate:
RUBEN O. MAGOS
Name of Nominee: _____________________________________________________
MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL PROPERTY CUSTODIAN/ SUPPLY OFFICER

Category: _______________________________________________________________
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER I/SUPPLY OFFICER I
Current Position of Nominee: __________________________________________
N/A
Subject Area and Grade Level Taught: _________________________________
PROPERTY & SUPPLY UNIT
Unit Assigned and Nature of Work: ___________________________________
DULAG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

School/Office: _________________________________________________________
BRGY. SERRANO, DULAG, LEYTE
School/Office Address: ________________________________________________
I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the
accompanying supporting documents are true and correct.
The nominee and the undersigned understand the Policy Guidelines on Awards and Incentive
Excellence in the Schools Division of Leyte and that we agree to abide by it.
FLORA M. PICA, DM
Name of Nominator: ___________________________________ SCHOOL PRINCIPAL III
Position: _____________________
Signature of Nominator: _______________________________ Date Signed: _________________

Enclosure 5
OMNIBUS CERTIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY AND VERACITY OF DOCUMENTS
RUBEN O. MAGOS
I ____________________________________________Filipino, of legal age, with permanent address
BRGY. COMBIS, DULAG, LEYTE
___________________________________________________ at under oath, hereby depose and state:
That each of the documents submitted is an authentic and original copy or a true and
faithful reproduction of the original, complete and that all statements and information provided
therein are true and correct;
That I am assuming full responsibility and accountability on the validity and authenticity of
the documents submitted;
That I am aware that any violation will automatically disqualify me from the selection
process;
That I am making these statements as part of the requirement for DepEd Schools Division
Office of Leyte PRAISE Awards 20 ____of the Department of Education Eastern Visayas.
By executing this Omnibus Certification of Authenticity and Veracity of Documents, I hereby
authorize the Department of Education Schools Division of Leyte to verify the authenticity of
documents I have submitted.
RUBEN O. MAGOS
________________________________________________________
Nominee’s Printed Name and Signature
Witness:
________________________________________________________
Division PRAISE Committee Chairperson
SUBSCRIBE AND SWORN to before me this __________day of __________________, 20 ________, affiant

exhibiting to me his/her Community Tax Certificate No. ______________________issued
on _____________________ at __________________________________, Philippines.
Notary Public
Until _______________________
PTR No. _______________________
Date _______________________
Place _______________________
TIN _______________________
Doc No. ____________________
Page No. ____________________
Book No. ____________________

Enclosure 6
POTENTIAL/INTERVIEW CHECKLIST & RATING SHEET
RUBEN O. MAGOS
Name of Nominee: _______________________________________________________________________
DULAG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL
School/Office: ___________________________________________________________________________
LEYTE
Division: ________________________________________________________________________________
MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL PROPERTY CUSTODIAN / SUPPLY OFFICER
Category: ________________________________________________________________________________
Directions: Put a check (/) on the space provided for if the nominee exhibits the
following indicators AT ALL TIMES. Otherwise, put an (x).
INDICATORS
A. Communication Skills
1. Expresses himself/herself clearly and logically
2. Communicates effectively with a wide range of individuals.
3. Responds clearly.
4. Response is relevant.
B. Ability to Present Ideas
1. Conveys information clearly and concisely.
2. Adjusts tone, style, and language of messages to suit audience.
3. Uses appropriate body language.
4. Demonstrates self-awareness and self-control.
5. Shows proficiency on the content/knowledge and expertise
inherent to the position.
C. Alertness
1. Perceives and acts quickly.
2. Manifests presence of mind
3. Manifests awareness of the environment.
D. Judgment
1. Analyzes issues and/or information and gives objective views.
2. Draws accurate conclusions based on evidence/data.
3. Breaks problems down and weighs up options.
4. Explores possibilities and identifies solutions.
E. Stress Tolerance
1. Talks positively.
2. Sees the big picture.
3. Avoids being hijacked
4. Pays attention.
No. of Checks (/)
Point/s Earned = (No. of Checks/21) x Allotted Points
Rated by:
__________________________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name of Rater
Date: ___________________________________

Enclosure 7
SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING KINDERGARTEN TEACHER I-III
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

Position: _____________________ School/District/Area: _________________________________
MEANS OF VERIFICATION Points

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
A. Performance (15 points)
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 ✓ IPCRF duly signed by
rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and authorities with date of
above) signing
• SY 2021-2022 and SY
Point/s Earned 2022-2023
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 15 ✓ Service Record
B. Outstanding/Meritorious Accomplishments
(70 points)
* Validity of the outstanding/meritorious
accomplishments and trainings shall be
within the last 3 years from the cut-off date
set by the Division PRAISE committee.
1. Outstanding Employee Award (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition /
• National Awardee – 5 points Certificate of Appreciation
• Nomination in the Department/ issued by DepEd or other
Awardee in the Region – 4 points agencies/organizations
Awardee in the Provincial Level sanctioned by DepEd
• Nomination in the Region / ✓ Memorandum / Advisory
Awardee in the Division – 3 points with attached search criteria
Awardee in the Municipal Level
• Nomination in the Division/
Awardee in the District – 2 points
Awardee in the Barangay Level
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the
allotted points for the criterion.
b. For same awards received in a school year,
points earned shall be based on the award
received in the highest governance level.
Otherwise, points earned are cumulative.

2. Innovations (5 points) ✓ Copy of the Innovation

• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points document with the name of the
• Adopted in the district - 4 points Nominee duly approved by the SDS
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points (for division, district, and school
• Started the implementation - 2 points nominees) or RD (for Regional
• Conceptualized - 1 point Office nominees)
✓ Certificate/Certification signed by
Note: the SDS (for division, district, and
school nominees) or RD (for
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will be Regional Office nominees)
divided by the number of innovators.
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the
3. Research and Development Projects (5 points) ✓ Copy of the complete

3.1 Conducted basic/action research approved manuscript of the
by the DO Research Team (3 points) implemented / conducted
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points Research and Development
Project duly approved by
• District Level - 2 points theSDS
• School Level - 1 point ✓ Certification from the SDO
Research Committee on the
Note: scope of the Research
a. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe Localeas to where it was
divided by the number of researchers. conducted
b.Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed
the allotted points for the criterion.
3.2 Presented a research paper (2 points) ✓ Memorandum / Invitation

Letter
• International - 2 points
✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• National - 1.75 points Certificate of Recognition asa
• Regional - 1.50 points Research Presenter
• Division - 1.25 points
• School - 1 point

4. Publication / Authorship (5 points) ✓ Copy of the published

• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points book/articles or
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will developed/contextualized
be divided learning resources/IEC
by the ✓ Certificate of Recognition
number of
authors
• Article published in a journal/ - 1 point per
newspaper/ magazine of wide article but
circulation not to
exceed 4
points
• Writer/Developer/Contextualizer 4 points
of LRs/IEC
• Co-Writer of LRs - 4 points will
be divided
by the
number of
writers
• Member of the Development/ - 0.5 point in

Quality Assurance team (Content each LR but
Reviewer, Language Editor, not to 3
Layout Artist, broadcaster/video points
presenters, or Illustrator) of the
Learning Resources
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed
b. Article published (at least division wide)
c. MOV Evaluation tool of the LR
5. Consultant/Resource ✓ Certificate of Recognition/

Speaker/LearningFacilitator/Trainer (5 Appreciation as Consultant/
Resource Speaker/ Learning
points)
Facilitator/ Trainer issued by
• International/National - 5 points DepEd or other
• Regional - 4 points agencies/organizations
• Division / Provincial - 3 points sanctioned by DepEd
• District / Municipal - 2 points
• School / Barangay - 1 point
Note:

6. Outreach Activity (5 points) ✓ Copy of the approved

• Sponsored/conducted community-based proposal
feeding program, medical/dental missions, ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
tree planting, clean-up drives, and other report (depicting the extent to
community development activities or civic which the activity has
engagements effectively and efficiently
addressed a pressing need or
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points
improved service
✓ Member - 2.5 points
delivery/learning outcome)
with attachments: Pictorial,
Note: written output, video,
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed Certificate of
the allotted points for the criterion. Recognition/Participation
7. Networking/Linkages (5 points) ✓ Copy of the approved
• Initiated resource generation projects and/or proposal (for IGPs and other
programs that will benefit the school special programs/projects)
✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or
Proponent/organizer - 5 points MOUs, deed of donation/
Member - 2.5 points acceptance or any other valid
proof
✓ Accomplishment report w/
Note: attachments: Pictures,
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earnedwill WFP/POW
be divided by the number of proponents.
8. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific tothe

position ✓ LP/DLL duly signed by at
least 3 authorities
• Served as Demonstration Teacher on innovative ✓ COT or Observation Chart
teaching techniques/ pedagogies (5 points) from at least 3 observer-
National - 5 points authorities
Region - 4 points ✓ Certificate of Recognition
Division - 3 points ✓ Memorandum and Matrix
District - 2 points reflecting Demonstration
School - 1 point
Teaching Activity (if
available)

• Won as coach or contestant (for teacher category)in ✓ Memorandum/Advisory/

the School, District, Division, Regional and Bulletin
National (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition as
Coach/Contestant
First Second Third
Placers Placers Placers
National 5 points 4 points 3 points
Regional 4 points 3 points 2 points
Division 3 points 2 points 1 point
District 2 points 1 point 0.75 points
School 1 point 0.75 points 0.50 point
• Organized Learning Action Cell (LAC)/ In-Service ✓ Activity Completion Report

Trainings/Learning and Development with attachments such as:
activities/sessions regarding improvement of
students’ learning outcomes (5 points) o Approved SLAC Session
Division - 5 points Plan
Area/District - 4 points o Resource Package
School - 3 points o Approved permit to
conduct
o Sample Program
o Attendance
o Pictorial
• Utilized/Adopted different instructional materials/ ✓ Weekly Home-Learning Plan

modality suitable for remote learning (5 points) ✓ Records of distributed KLE,
HBLF Toolkit, Audio andVideo
Note: Point/s earned is relative to the Lessons, and Online learning
percentage of utilization of the IMs in any resources
learning delivery modality adopted by the ✓ Sample of audio and video
teacher lessons and online learning
resources
Percentage *KLE/SLMs Online

*HBLFTK Video Audio
Classes
95%-100% 5 points 5 points 5 points 5 points 5 points
79%-below 1 point 1 point 1 point 1 point 1 point
Note:
1. KLE/SLMs & HBLFT non-negotiable
2. Point/s Earned = Average of the scores attained

• Kept a record on the Analysis Report on Learners’ ✓ Copy of the Analysis Report
Performance and submitted the same to the School duly certified and received by
Head (5 points) the School Head
One point for each of the analysis reports given

below:
1. Pre-Early Childhood Development (ECD) Results
2. Post ECD Results
3. Quarterly Progress Reports
4. Most and Least Learned Items in ECD
5. Most and Least Learned Competencies
• Implemented initiatives on the alignment of ✓ Picto-narrative report duly

delivery of instruction and management of signed by the School Head
activities in the new normal (5 points)
5 or more initiatives - 5 points
4 initiatives - 4 points
1 initiative - 1 point
• Produced learners showing 75% mastery of letter ✓ Summary of Assessment

knowledge and sound production (5 points) Report duly signed by the
School Head
80%-100% of the learners - 5 points
60%-79% - 4 points
40%-59% - 3 points
20% - 39% - 2 points
19% and below - 1 point
C. Education & Learning and Development (10 points)
1. Education (5 points)
• Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree - 5 points ✓ Transcript of Records
• Complete Academic Requirements - 4.5 points ✓ Certificate of Completion of
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree Academic Requirements /
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points
Certification of Units
Doctor’s Degree units
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 3.5 points
Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
• Complete Academic Requirements - 3 points
for Master’s Degree
• Earned at least 18 MA Units - 2.5 points

2. Learning and Development (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Participation

✓ Participation to Learning and Development issued by DepEd or other
Activities (such as trainings, seminars, agencies/organizations
workshops, conferences, fora, etc.) sanctioned by DepEd
• International/National - 5 points
• Regional - 4 points
• Division - 3 points
• District - 2 points
Note:
b.Validity of the learning and development
activities shall be within the last 3 years from
the cut-off date set by the Division PRAISE
committee.
D. Potential (5 points)
✓ Interview and essay shall be conducted ✓ Potential/Interview Checklist
• Communication skills & Rating Sheet
• Ability to present ideas
• Alertness
• Judgment
• Stress Tolerance

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING KINDERGARTEN MASTER TEACHER

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ______________________School/District/Area: ________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) authorities with date of
signing
Point/s Earned • SY2021-2022 and
SY 2022-2023
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 15
✓ Service Record
B. Outstanding/Meritorious Accomplishments(70 points)
* Validity of the outstanding/meritorious accomplishments
and trainings shall be within last 3 years from the cut-off
date set by the Division PRAISE committee.
sanctioned by DepEd
Awardee in the Provincial Level
• Nomination in the Region /
✓ Memorandum / Advisory
with attached search criteria
Awardee in the Division – 3 points
Note:
b.For same awards received in a school year, points
earned shall be based on the award received in the
highest governance level. Otherwise, points earned
are cumulative.
• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points document with the name of
• Adopted in the district - 4 points the Nominee duly approved
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points by the SDS (for division,
• Started the implementation - 2 points district, and school nominees)
• Conceptualized - 1 point or RD (for Regional Office
nominees)
✓ Certificate/Certification
Note: signed by the SDS (for
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned willbe division, district, and school
divided by the number of innovators. nominees)


manuscript of the
3.1 Conducted basic/action research approved bythe
implemented / conducted
DO Research Team (3 points)
Research and Development
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points Project duly approved by the
• District Level - 2 points SDS
scope of the Research Locale
Note:
as to where it was conducted
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be
divided by the number of researchers.
3.2 Presented a research paper (2 points)

• International - 2 points ✓ Memorandum / Invitation
Letter
• National - 1.75 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• Regional - 1.50 points Certificate of Recognition as a
• Division - 1.25 points Research Presenter

be divided by learning resources/IEC
the number ✓ Certificate of Recognition
of authors.
not circulation not to exceed
4 points
• Writer/Developer/Contextualizer - 4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Reviewer, Language Editor, not to exceed
Layout Artist, broadcaster/video 3 points
Learning Resources
Note:

5. Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning ✓ Certificate of Recognition/

Facilitator/Trainer (5 points) Appreciation as Consultant/
• International/National - 5 points Facilitator/ Trainer issued by
DepEd, or other
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to
exceed the allotted points for the criterion.

improved service
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to ✓ Certificate of
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. Recognition/Participation

proof
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earnedwill WFP/POW
8. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to

the position ✓ LP/DLL duly signed by at
least 3 authorities.
National - 5points authorities
Division - 3 points Memorandum and Matrix
School - 1 point Teaching Activity (if available)

• Served as a mentor/coach to other teachers (5 ✓ Certification as a mentor by

points) the school head
5 or more mentees (include the

pre-service teachers) - 5 points
4 mentees - 4 points
only 1 mentee - 1 point
✓ Memorandum/Advisory/
• Won as coach or contestant (for teacher category)in Bulletin
the School, District, Division, Regional and National ✓ Certificate of Recognition as
(5 points) Coach/Contestant
First Placers Second Placers Third Placers


conduct
o Sample Program
o Attendance
o Pictorials
✓ Led in the preparation and enrichment of the ✓ Certificate of Recognition of

curriculum aligned with the distance learning being involved in the
modalities adopted by the school (5 points) preparation and enrichmentof
Learning Resources such as
Based on number of instructional materials (IMs). ICT-supported Home- based
5 or more IMs - 5 points Learning Facilitators’ Toolkit
4 IMs - 4 points (HBLF) Toolkit, Audio and
3 IMs - 3 points Video Lessons, and Online and
Offline learning resources
2 IMs - 2 points
✓ Sample of developed audio
1 IM - 1 point
and video lessons and
conducted online learning
resources

• Led colleagues in the interpretation and utilization ✓ Copy of the Analysis Report
of the following analysis reports for the duly certified and received
improvement of the teaching and learning process by the School Head
(2.5 points)
✓ Completion Report with
One point for each of the analysis reports (ARs) MOVs on the activity
made. conducted
5 or more ARs - 2.5 points
4 ARs - 2 points
3 ARs - 1.5 points
2 ARs - 1 point
1 AR - 0.5 point
✓ Weekly Home-Learning Plan

• Utilized/Adopted different instructional materials/
✓ Records of distributed KLE,
modality suitable for remote learning (5 points)
HBLF Toolkit, Audio and
Video Lessons, and Online
Note: Point/s earned is relative to the
learning resources
percentage of utilization of the IMs in any
✓ Sample of audio and video
learning delivery modality adopted by the
lessons and online learning
teacher
resources
Percentage *KLE/SLMs Online

*HBLFTK Video Audio
Classes
Note:
1. KLE/SLMs & HBLFT non-negotiable
• Implemented initiatives on the alignment of

delivery of instruction and management of
activities in the new normal (2.5 points) ✓ Picto-narrative report duly
signed by the school head
5 or more initiatives - 2.5 points

3 initiatives - 1.5 points
2 initiatives - 1 point
1 initiative - 0.5 point


• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points Certification of Units Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ELEMENTARY TEACHER I-III

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: _____________________School/District/Area: _________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 rating ✓ IPCRF duly signed by
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) authorities with date of
signing
Point/s Earned • SY2021-2022 and SY
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 15 2022-2023
✓ Service Record
(70 points)
accomplishments and trainings shall be within
the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by the
Division PRAISE committee.
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe
b. For same awards received in a school year,points
highest governance level. Otherwise, points
earned are cumulative.
nominees)
Note: ✓ Certificate/Certification
signed by the SDS (for
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will be division, district, and school


• Conducted basic/action research manuscript of the
approved by the DO Research Team (3 implemented / conducted
points) Research and Development
SDS
• District Level - 2 points ✓ Certification from the SDO
• School Level - 1 point Research Committee on the
Note: as to where it was conducted
b.Points earned are cumulative but not to
✓ Memorandum / Invitation
3.2 Presented a research paper (2 points) Letter
• International - 2 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• National - 1.75 points Certificate of Recognition as
• Regional - 1.50 points a Research Presenter
4. Publication / Authorship (5 points) ✓ Copy of the published book/
• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points learning resources/articles
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will be ✓ Certificate of Recognition
divided by the
number of
authors
newspaper/ magazine of wide article but not
circulation not to exceed
4 points
of LRs/IEC
• Co-Writer of LRs - 4 points will be
divided by the
number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


• International/National - 5 points Facilitator/ Trainer issued
byDepEd or other
agencies/organizations
Note:
6. Outreach Activity (5 points) ✓ Copy of the

• Sponsored/conducted community-based approved proposal
tree planting, clean-up drives, and other report (depicting the extent
community development activities or civic to which the activity has
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points addressed a pressing need
✓ Member - 2.5 points orimproved service
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to Certificate of
• Initiated resource generation projects proposal (for IGPs and
and/or programs that will benefit the school otherspecial
programs/projects)
Proponent/organizer - 5 points ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs
Member - 2.5 points orMOUs, deed of donation/
acceptance or any other
valid proof
✓ Accomplishment report
Note:
w/attachments: Pictures,
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earned WFP/POW
will be divided by the number of proponents.
least 3 authorities

• Won as coach or contestant (for teacher category) ✓ Memorandum/Advisory/

in the School, District, Division, Regional and Bulletin
Coach/Contestant


conduct
Note: o Sample Program
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to o Attendance
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. o Pictorials
• Utilized/Adopted different instructional materials/ ✓ Weekly Home-Learning Plan

modality suitable for remote learning (5 points) ✓ Documented data of
distributed & utilized
5 or above IMs - 5 points learning resources duly
4 IMs - 4 points signed by the school principal
3 IMs - 3 points ✓ Records of utilized IMs
2 IMs - 2 points
1 IM - 1 point ✓ Copy of the Analysis Report
duly certified and received by
• Kept a record on the Analysis Report on Learners’
the School Head
Performance and submitted the same to the
School Head (5 points)
One point for each of the analysis reports/content:

2. Data of Learners’ Summative Assessment
Result with the Test Item Analysis
4. Individual Learning Monitoring Plan (if any)
5. Learner’s Profile


delivery of instruction and management of signed by the school head

• Produced learners who attained at least ✓ Summary of Assessment

Satisfactory (80%) rating (5 points) Report duly signed by School
Head
60%-79% - 4 points
40%-59% - 3 points
20%-39% - 2 points
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points Certification of Units
Doctor’s Degree units Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Activities (such as trainings, seminars, workshops, agencies/organizations
conferences, fora, etc.) sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
b. Validity of the learning and development activities shall
be within the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by the
✓ Interview and essay shall be conducted ✓ Potential/Interview Checklist &
Rating Sheet
• Communication skills
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ELEMENTARY MASTER TEACHER

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ___________________ School/District/Area: ___________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • SY 2021-2022 and SY
✓ Service Record
(70 points)
Note:
b.For same awards received in a school year,


nominees)
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will signed by the SDS (for
be divided by the number of innovators. division, district, and school
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed nominees)

3.1 Conducted basic/action research approved by manuscript of the
the DO Research Team (3 points) implemented / conducted
Note: scope of the Research Locale
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will
be divided by the number of researchers.
Certificate of Recognition as a
• National - 1.75 points
Research Presenter
• Regional - 1.50 points
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will ✓ Certificate of Recognition
be divided
by the
number of
authors
not circulation not to
exceed 4
points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers


Learning Resources
Note:

DepEd or other
Note:

✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points addressed a pressing need or
✓ Member - 2.5 points improved service


• Initiated resource generation projects proposal (for IGPs and other
and/or programs that will benefit the school special programs/projects)
proof
attachments: Pictures,
Note:
WFP/POW
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earned
least 3 authorities

• Served as a mentor/coach to other teachers Certification as a mentor by

(5points) the school head
5 or more mentees (include the

pre-service teachers) - 5 points

First Placers Second Placers Third Placers Coach/Contestant
•
✓ Activity Completion Report

• Organized Learning Action Cell (LAC)/ In-Service with attachments such as:
Trainings/Learning and Development
activities/sessions regarding improvement of o Approved SLAC Session
students’ learning outcomes (5 points) Plan
Division - 5 points
o Resource Package
Area/District - 4 points
o Approved permit to
School - 3 points
conduct
o Sample Program
Note:
✓ Led in the preparation and enrichment of the ✓ Certificate of Recognition of

curriculum aligned with the distance learning being involved in the
modalities adopted by the school (5 points) preparation and enrichment
of Learning Resources such
Based on number of instructional materials (IMs). as ICT-supported Home-
5 or more IMs - 5 points based Learning Facilitators’
4 IMs - 4 points Toolkit (HBLF) Toolkit,
3 IMs - 3 points Audio and Video Lessons,
2 IMs - 2 points and Online and Offline
learning resources
1 IM - 1 point
✓ Sample of developed audio
and video lessons and
conducted online learning
resources

✓ Led colleagues in the interpretation and utilization ✓ Copy of the Analysis Report
of the following analysis reports for the duly certified and received
improvement of the teaching and learning process by the School Head
(5 points)
✓ Completion Report with

One point for each of the analysis reports MOVs on the activity
(ARs) made. conducted
5 or more ARs - 5 points
4 ARs - 4 points
3 ARs - 3 points
2 ARs - 2 points
1 AR - 1 point
✓ Implemented initiatives on the alignment of delivery ✓ Picto-narrative report duly

of instruction and management of activities in the signed by the school head
new normal (5 points)

• Complete Academic - 4.5 points ✓ Certificate of Completion of
Requirements Academic Requirements /
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Certification of Units Earned
Degree
• Earned at least 18 -4 points
Doctorate/ Doctor’s
Degree units
Laws (Juris Doctor)
• Complete Academic -3 points
Requirements


Note:
activities shall be within the last 3 years
from the cut-off date set by the Regional
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER I-III

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ____________________School/District/Area: __________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • SY 2021-2022, and
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 15 SY 2022-2023
✓ Service Record
(70 points)
Note:


• Adopted in the district - 4 points the Nominee duly approved by
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points the SDS (for division, district,
• Started the implementation - 2 points and school nominees) or RD
• Conceptualized - 1 point (for Regional Office nominees)
Note: division, district, and school
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will nominees) or RD (for
be divided by the number of innovators. Regional Office nominees)
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed


• International - 2 points Letter
• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points book/ learning
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will resources/articles
be divided by ✓ Certificate of Recognition
the number
of authors
exceed 4
points
of LRs / EEC
be divided by
the number
of writers


Reviewer, Language Editor, not to

Layout Artist, broadcaster/video exceed
presenters, or Illustrator) of the 3 points
Learning Resources
Note:

• Regional - 4 points DepEd or other
• Division / Provincial - 3 points agencies/organizations
• District / Municipal - 2 points sanctioned by DepEd
Note:

effectively and efficiently
engagements
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points improved service
✓ Member - 2.5 points delivery/learning outcome)


acceptance or any other valid
Member - 2.5 points
proof
Note: WFP/POW

least 3 authorities
School - 1 point Teaching Activity (if
available)


Coach/Contestant

Division - 5 points o Resource Package
Area/District - 4 points o Approved permit to
School - 3 points conduct
o Sample Program
Note: o Attendance
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to o Pictorials
• Utilized/Adopted different instructional materials/ ✓ Report/Records of

modality suitable for remote learning (5 points) distributed & utilized
learning resources (duly
5 or above IMs – 5 points signed/attested)
4 IMs – 4 points
3 IMs – 3 points
2 IMs – 2 points
1 IMs – 1 point
Performance and submitted the same to the duly certified and received by
School Head (5 points) the School Head
One point for each of the analysis reports/content:

2. Data of Learners’ Summative Assessment
Result
4. Individual Learning Monitoring Plan (if any)
5. Learners’ Profile
6. Test Item Analysis

• Implemented initiatives on the alignment of delivery of ✓ Picto-narrative report duly

instruction and management of activities in the new signed by the school head
normal (5 points)

✓ Summary of Assessment
• Produced learners who attained at least Report duly signed by
Satisfactory (80%) rating (5 points) School Head

60%-79% - 4 points
40%-59% - 3 points
20%-39% - 2 points
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:
the cut-off date set by the Division
PRAISE committee.
✓ Interview and essay shall be conducted ✓ Potential/Interview
• Communication skills Checklist & Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL MASTER TEACHER

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ___________________School/District/Area: ___________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS VERIFICATION Earned
(MOVs)
rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and authorities with date
above) ofsigning
• SY 2021-2022 and
Point/s Earned SY 2022-2023
(65 points)
1. Outstanding Employee Award (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition
• National Awardee – 5 points /Certificate of
• Nomination in the Department/ Appreciation issued by
Awardee in the Region/ – 4 points DepEd or other
Awardee in the Provincial Level agencies/organizations
• Nomination in the Region / sanctioned by DepEd
Awardee in the Division – 3 points ✓ Memorandum / Advisory
Awardee in the Municipal Level with attached search
• Nomination in the Division/ criteria
Note:

• Started the implementation - 2 points district, and school
• Conceptualized -1 point nominees)or RD (for
Regional Office nominees)
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will division, district, and
be divided by the number of innovators. schoolnominees) or RD
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed (for Regional Office
the allotted points for the criterion. nominees)


3.1 Conducted basic/action research approved by manuscript of the implemented
the DO Research Team (3 points) / conducted Research and
Development Project duly
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points approved by theSDS
scope of the Research Localeas
Note: to where it was conducted
a. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe

Research Presenter
be divided
by the
number of
authors
circulation not to
exceed 4
points
of LRs/IEC
be divided
by the
number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


DepEd or other
Note:


proof
Note:
WFP/POW
least 3 authorities


✓ Duly signed Coaching and
5 or more mentees (include the Mentoring documentation
pre-service teachers) - 5 points report

Coach/Contestant

• Organized Learning Action Cell (LAC)/ In-Service

Trainings/Learning and Development ✓ Activity Completion Report
activities/sessions regarding improvement of with attachments such as:
students’ learning outcomes (5 points)
Division - 5 points o Approved SLAC Session
Area/District - 4 points Plan
School - 3 points o Resource Package
conduct
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to o Sample Program
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. o Attendance
o Pictorials
• Led colleagues in the interpretation and utilization

of the following analysis reports for the ✓ Copy of the Analysis Report
improvement of the teaching and learning process duly certified and received by
(5 points) the School Head
One point for each of the analysis reports (ARs)

made.
5 or more ARs - 5 points
4 ARs - 4 points
3 ARs - 3 points
2 ARs - 2 points
1 AR - 1 point



Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER I-III

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ____________________ School/District/Area: __________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • SY 2021-2022 and
✓ Service Record
(70 points)
Awardee in the Region/ – 4 points agencies/organizations
Note:
nominees)
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned willbe signed by the SDS (for
divided by the number of innovators. division, district, and school
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe nominees) or RD (for
allotted points for the criterion. Regional Office nominees)


exceed the allotted points for the criterion .
• National - 1.75 points Research Presenter
be divided by
the number
of authors
exceed 4
points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number
of writers
Learning Resources
Note:


DepEd or other
Note:


proof

least 3 authorities

• Won as coach or contestant (for teacher category)in ✓ Memorandum/Advisory/

the School, District, Division, Regional and National Bulletin
(5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition as
Coach/Contestant


o Approved SLAC Session
Plan
students’ learning outcomes (5 points)
o Sample Program
Note: o Attendance
✓ Weekly Home-Learning Plan
• Utilized/Adopted different instructional materials/
✓ Records of distributed SLMs,
modality suitable for remote learning (5 points)
LAS, Audio and Video Lessons,
and Online learning resources
Note: Point/s earned is relative to the
percentage of utilization of the IMs in any
resources
teacher
Contextu Lear Online
Percentage Video Audio
alized ning Classes
SLMs Activ
ity
Shee
ts
Note:

• Produced prepared SHS graduates/learners for the

SHS Exits (5 points)
For SHS Teachers under the Academic, ✓ Certified copy of Results on

Sports, and Arts and Design Track the Scholarship
Number of learners in handled classes
who passed the DOST, UPCAT, and other
related scholarships (within 5 school years)
5 learners and above - 5 points
4 learners - 4 points
1 learner - 1 point
For SHS Teachers under TVL ✓ TESDA Registry of Certified

Percentage of learners with NC (within 5 Workers reflecting the names
school years) of the SHS Learners/
80%-100% - 5 points Graduates
60%-79% - 4 points
40%-59% - 3 points
20%-39% - 2 points
Performance and submitted the same to the School duly certified and received by
Head (5 points) the School Head
One point for each of the analysis reports given

below:
1. Diagnostic Test
2. Written Summative Tests
3. Performance-Based Records
4. Quarterly Learning Outcomes
5. Analysis on the Most and Least Learned
Competencies
✓ Picto-narrative report duly



• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 3.5points
• Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:
from the cut-off date set by the Division
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL MASTER TEACHER

Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ____________________School/District/Area: _________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
✓ Service Record
(70 points)
Note:


nominees)
✓ Certificate/Certification signed
Note:
by the SDS (for division,
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned willbe district, and schoolnominees)
divided by the number of innovators. or RD (for Regional Office
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe nominees)

Research Presenter


be divided
by the
number of
authors
exceed 4
points
of LRs/IEC
be divided
by the
number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:

DepEd or other
Note:



proof
least 3 authorities
• Served as a mentor/coach to other teachers ✓ Certification as a mentor by

(2.5points) the school head
5 or more mentees - 2.5 points
3 mentees - 1.5 points
2 mentees - 1 point
only 1 mentee - 0.5 point


students’ learning outcomes (2.5 points) o Approved SLAC Session
Division - 2.5 points Plan
District - 1.5 points o Resource Package
School - 0.5 points o Approved permit to
conduct
• Led in the preparation and enrichment of the ✓ Sample copy of

curriculum aligned with the distance learning contextualized SLMs, LAS,
modalities adopted by the school (5 points) Video and Audio Lessons,and
Online learning resources
One point for each of the instructional materials duly certified by the school
given below: head
Contextualized Self-Learning Modules (SLMs) ✓ Sample of contextualized
Learning Activity Sheets (LAS) SLMS, LAS, audio and video
Audio Lessons lessons and online learning
Video lessons resources
Online learning resources
• Led colleagues in the interpretation and utilization ✓ Copy of the Corrected

of the following analysis reports for the Analysis Report duly
improvement of the teaching and learning process certified and received bythe
(5 points) School Head
Activity Completion
One point for each of the analysis reports Report/Coaching Forms with
given below: MOVs on the activity
conducted
Diagnostic Test
Written Summative Tests
Performance-Based Records
Quarterly Learning Outcomes
Analysis on the Most and Least Learned
Competencies

• Utilized/Adopted different instructional materials/ ✓ Weekly Home-LearningPlan

modality suitable for remote learning (5 points) ✓ Records of distributed SLMs,
LAS, Audio and VideoLessons,
Note: Point/s earned is relative to the and Online learning
percentage of utilization of the IMs in any resources
teacher
Learning Online
resources
Percentage Contextualized Activity Video Audio
SLMs Sheets Classes
Note:
• Produced prepared SHS graduates/learners for the

SHS Exits (5 points)
For SHS Teachers under the Academic, Sports, ✓ Certified copy of Results on
and Arts and Design Track the Scholarship
Number of learners in handled classes who
passed the DOST, UPCAT, and other related
scholarships (within 5 school years)
5 learners and above - 5 points
1 learner - 1 point
For SHS Teachers under TVL

Percentage of learners with NC (within 5
✓ TESDA Registry of Certified
school years)
Workers reflecting the
80%-100% - 5 points namesof the SHS Learners/
60%-79% - 4 points Graduates
40% -59% - 3 points
20%-39% - 2 points




Laws (Juris Doctor)
2. Learning and Development (5 points) ✓ Certificate of

✓ Participation to Learning and Development Participation issued by
Activities (such as trainings, seminars, DepEd or other
workshops, conferences, fora, etc.) agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not
to exceed the allotted points for the
criterion.
b. Validity of the learning and development
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING

ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM (ALS) TEACHER I-III
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________
Position: ____________________School/District/Area: __________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
✓ Service Record
(70 points)
Awardee in the Division/ – 3 points with attached search criteria
Note:


• Adopted in the district - 2.5 points the Nominee duly approved by
• Started the implementation - 1.5 points and school nominees) or RD
Note:
division, district, and school
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will be nominees) or RD (for
divided by the number of innovators. Regional Office nominees)


• National - 4 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• Regional - 3 points Certificate of Recognition as a
Research Presenter


be divided by
the number
of authors
exceed 4
points
of LRSs/IEC
be divided by
the number
of writers
Learning Resources
Note:

DepEd or other
Note:


improved service
7. With Outstanding Accomplishments on the

Learners’ Access (6 points)
✓ Signed Certification(s) from

✓ Mapping for Enrollees (2 points) the concerned officials (Brgy
o 100 and above - 2.00 points Officials or immediate
o 80-99 - 1.75 points superior)
✓ Signed Mapping Reports
o 60-79 - 1.50 points
(LGU Officials/immediate
o 40-59 - 1.25 points superior)
o 39 and below - 1.00 point
✓ Enrolment (LIS –based) (2 points) ✓ Copy of the generated list of

o 75 and above - 2.0 points enrolment from the LIS
✓ Certification of the veracity of
o 57-74 - 1.5 points the data by an EPSA or any
o 37-56 - 1.0 point higher office as authorized by
o 36 and below - 0.5 point the Planning Office at the SDO
✓ Program Handled (2 points)
[Program cover but not limited to the following: (1) ✓ Signed/Approved Class
BLP; (2) A&E EL; (3) A&E JHS); Plus at least 3 Program/Teachers Program
Informal Education Programs] ✓ Copy of the list of
learners under each of
the program handled
o 5 Programs and above - 2.00 points ✓ Certification of the veracity of
o 4 Programs - 1.75 points the information by an EPSA or
o 3 Programs - 1.50 points any higher office as authorized
by the Planning Office at the
o 2 Programs - 1.25 points SDO
o 1 Program - 1.00 point
8. With Outstanding Accomplishments on the Quality ✓ Copy of the generated list of

of Outputs (13 points) enrolment from the LIS
✓ Copy of the Masterlist of
✓ Percentage of Completers (3 points) Completers based on LIS
✓ Copy of the report showing the
(Computed against the No. of Enrolment and taking percentage of completers
the average from both the Elem and JHS levels) ✓ Certification of the veracity of the
data by an EPSA or any higher office

o 91% - 100% - 3 points as authorized by the Planning Office

at the SDO
o 81% - 90% - 2.5 points
o 71% - 80% - 2.0 points
o 61% - 70% - 1.5 points
o 60% and below - 1 point
✓ Percentage of Qualifiers (4 points)

Completers based on LIS
(Computed against the No. of Completers and taking
the average from both the Elem and JHS levels)
Qualifiers (based on the revalida)
o 91% - 100% - 4 points percentage of Qualifiers (shall attach
o 81% - 90% - 3.5 points the duly accomplished copy of the
o 71% - 80% - 3 points Monitoring Tool)
o 61% - 70% - 2.5 points ✓ Certification of the veracity of the
data by an EPSA or any higher office
o 60% and below - 2 points as authorized by the Planning Office
at the SDO
✓ Percentage of Passers (6 points) ✓ Copy of the Masterlist of

Qualifiers (based on the revalida)
(Computed against the No. of Qualifiers and taking ✓ Copy of the Masterlist of Passers
the average from both the Elem and JHS levels) (based on the revalida)
percentage of Passers (shall attach
o 91% - 100% - 6 points the duly accomplished copy of the
o 81% - 90% - 5 points Monitoring Tool)
o 71% - 80% - 4 points ✓ Certification of the veracity of the
o 61% - 70% - 3 points data by an EPSA or any higher office
o 60% and below - 2 points as authorized by the Planning Office
at the SDO
9. Networking/Linkages (5 points) ✓ Copy of the approved and
✓ Initiated resource generation projects and/or implemented proposal(s) (for
programs that will benefit the ALS learners and/orthe IGPs and other initiatives)
entire CLC ✓ Copy of the MOA(s) or
MOU(s), deed of
80,000.00 and above - 5 points donation/acceptance or any
60,000.00 – 79,000.00 - 4 points other valid proof of receipt of
any amount received (in cash
40,000.00 – 59,000.00 - 3 points or in kind)
20,000.00 – 39,000.00 - 2 points Note: Use the computationin
19,000.00 and below - 1 point Brigada Eskwela in the
conversion of materials/labor
Note: into cash
a. For more than one proponent, points earnedwill be ✓ Accomplishment report w/
divided by the number of proponents. attachments: Pictures,
WFP/POW
b.Generated funds shall be the total ✓ Certification of the veracityof
accumulated amount within the recent 5 the data by an EPSA or any
consecutive years.
higher office as authorized
by the PlanningOffice at the
SDO


the position
• Served as Demonstration Teacher on innovative ✓ LP/DLL duly signed by at

teaching techniques/ pedagogies (3 points) least 3 authorities
✓ COT or Observation Chart
from at least 3 observer-
National - 3 points
authorities
Region - 2.5 points ✓ Certificate of Recognition
District - 1.5 points reflecting Demonstration
✓ Memorandum/Advisory/
• Won as coach or contestant (for teacher category) Bulletin
in the School, District, Division, Regional and ✓ Certificate of Recognition as
National (5 points) Coach/Contestant


o Sample Program
Note: o Attendance
the allotted points for the criterion. o Pictorials
• Implemented initiatives on the alignment of ✓ Picto-narrative report duly signed

delivery of instruction and management of by the school head



• Complete Academic Requirements - 4.5 points
✓ Certificate of Completion of
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points Academic Requirements /
Doctor’s Degree units Certification of Units
✓ Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 3.5 points Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
✓ Complete Academic Requirements - 3 points

• Participation to Learning and issued by DepEd or other
Development Activities (such as agencies/organizations
trainings, seminars, workshops, sanctioned by DepEd
conferences, fora, etc.)
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not
to exceed the allotted points for the
criterion.
PRAISE committee.
✓ Interview and essay shall be conducted ✓ Potential/Interview Checklist&
Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment


MASTER TEACHER IN THE ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM (ALS)
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 ✓ IPCRF duly signed by
above) signing
• SY 2021-2022 and
Point/s Earned SY 2022-2023
(70 points)

Awardee in the District – 1 point
Note:
• Adopted in the region/division - 3.0 points document with the name of
• Adopted in the district - 2.5 points the Nominee duly approved
• Fully implemented in the school - 2.0 points by the SDS (for division,
• Started the implementation - 1.5 points district, and school nominees)
• Conceptualized - 1.0 point or RD (for Regional Office
nominees)
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed nominees) or RD (for

the allotted points for the criterion Regional Office nominees)

manuscript of the
3.1 Conducted basic/action research approved
by the DO Research Team (3 points)
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will as to where it was
be divided by the number of researchers. conducted

• International - 2.00 points Letter
• Regional - 1.50 points Certificate of Recognition as
• Division - 1.25 points a Research Presenter
• School - 1.00 point
• Sole authorship of a book -5 points book/ learning
• Co-authorship of a book -5 points will resources/articles
be divided by ✓ Certificate of Recognition
the number
of authors
exceed 4
points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number
of writers
Learning Resources
Note:
exceed the allotted points for the
criterion.


• International/National - 3.0 points Facilitator/ Trainer issued by
• Regional - 2.5 points DepEd or other
• Division / Provincial - 2.0 points agencies/organizations
• District / Municipal - 1.5 points sanctioned by DepEd
• School / Barangay - 1.0 point
Note:

✓ Proponent/organizer - 3.0 points addressed a pressing need or
Recognition/Participation

Learners’ Access (6 points)
✓ Signed Certification(s) from

7.1 Mapping for Enrollees (2 points)
the concerned officials (Brgy
• 100 and above - 2.00 points Officials or immediate
• 80-99 - 1.75 points superior)
• 60-79 - 1.50 points ✓ Signed Mapping Reports
• 40-59 - 1.25 points (LGU Officials/immediate
• 39 and below - 1.00 point superior)
✓ ALS Form 1
✓ Copy of the generated list of

7.2 Enrolment (LIS –based) (2 points) enrolment from the LIS
• 75 and above - 2.0 points ✓ Certification of the veracity of
• 57-74 - 1.5 points the data by an EPSA or any
• 37-56 - 1.0 point higher office as authorized by
• 36 and below - 0.5 point the Planning Office at the
SDO

7.3 Programs Handled (2 points)
[Programs cover but not limited to the following: ✓ Signed/Approved Class

(1) BLP; (2) A&E EL; (3) (A&E JHS); Plus at least 2 Program/ Teachers Program
InformalEducation Programs] ✓ Copy of the list of learners
under each of the programs
• 5 Programs and above- 2.00 points handled
• 4 Programs - 1.75 points ✓ Certification of the veracity of
the information by an EPSA
• 3 Programs - 1.50 points
or any higher office as
• 2 Programs - 1.25 points authorized by the Planning
• 1 Program - 1.00 point Office at the SDO

Quality of Outputs (12 points)
8.1 Percentage of Completers (3 points) ✓ Copy of the generated list of

enrolment from the LIS
(Computed against the No. of Enrolment and ✓ Copy of the Masterlist of
takingthe average from both the Elem and JHS Completers based on LIS
levels) ✓ Copy of the report showing
the percentage of completers
• 91% - 100% - 3.0 points ✓ Certification of the veracity of
the data by an EPSA or any
• 81% - 90% - 2.5 points higher office as authorized by
• 71% - 80% - 2.0 points the Planning Office at the
• 61% - 70% - 1.5 points SDO
• 60% and below - 1.0 point
Completers based on LIS
8.2 Percentage of Qualifiers (4 points) ✓ Copy of the Masterlist of
Qualifiers (based on the
(Computed against the No. of Completers and revalida)
takingthe average from both the Elem and JHS ✓ Copy of the report showing
levels) the percentage of Qualifiers
(shall attach the duly
• 91% - 100% - 4.0 points accomplished copy of the
• 81% - 90% - 3.5 points Monitoring Tool)
• 71% - 80% - 3.0 points ✓ Certification of the veracity of
• 61% - 70% - 2.5 points
higher office as authorized by
• 60% and below - 2.0 points the Planning Office at the
SDO

8.3 Percentage of Passers (5 points) ✓ Copy of the Masterlist of

Qualifiers (based on the
(Computed against the No. of Qualifiers and revalida)
taking the average from both the Elem and JHS Passers (based on the
levels) revalida)
✓ Copy of the report showing
• 91% - 100% - 5 points the percentage of Passers
• 81% - 90% - 4 points (shall attach the duly
• 71% - 80% - 3 points accomplished copy of the
• 61% - 70% - 2 points Monitoring Tool)
✓ Certification of the veracity of
• 60% and below - 1 point
higher office as authorized by
the Planning Office at the
SDO
9. Networking/Linkages (5 points)
Initiated resource generation projects and/or ✓ Copy of the approved and

programs that will benefit the ALS learners and/or implemented proposal(s) (for
the entire CLC IGPs and other initiatives)
✓ Copy of the MOA(s) or
• 80,000.00 and above - 5 points MOU(s), deed of
• 60,000.00 – 79,000.00 - 4 points donation/acceptance or any
other valid proof of receipt
• 40,000.00 – 59,000.00 - 3 points
of any amount received (in
• 20,000.00 – 39,000.00 - 2 points cash or in kind)
• 19,000.00 and below - 1 point
Note: Use the computation
applied in the Brigada
Note: Eskwela for the conversion of
a) For more than one proponent, point/s earned materials/labor into cash
b) Generated funds shall be the total
accumulated amount within the recent 5 attachments: Pictures,
consecutive years. WFP/POW
✓ Certification of the veracity
of the data by an EPSA or
any higher office as
authorized by the Planning
Office at the SDO

10. Other Meritorious Accomplishments (26 points)
10.1Served as Demonstration Teacher on ✓ LP/DLL duly signed by at

innovative teaching techniques/ pedagogies least 3 authorities
(3 points) ✓ COT or Observation Chart
• National - 3.0 points from at least 3 observer-
• Region - 2.5 points authorities
• Division - 2.0 points ✓ Certificate of Recognition
• District - 1.5 points ✓ Memorandum and Matrix
• School - 1.0 point reflecting Demonstration
Teaching Activity (if available)
✓ Certification as a mentor by
10.2 Served as a mentor/coach to other teachers (3 the school head
points)
• 5 or more mentees - 3.0 points
• 4 mentees - 2.5 points
• only 1 mentee - 1.0 point
10.3 Won as coach or contestant (for teacher ✓ Memorandum/Advisory/

category) in the School, District, Division, Bulletin
Regional and National (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition as
Coach/Contestant

10.4 Organized Learning Action Cell (LAC)/ In- ✓ Activity Completion Report
Service Trainings/Learning and Development with all the following
activities/sessions regarding improvement of attachments:
• Division - 4 points Plan
• Area/District - 3 points o Resource Package
• School - 2 points o Approved permit to
conduct
o Pictorials

✓ Certificate of Recognition
10.5 Led in the preparation and enrichment of of being involved in the
thecurriculum aligned with the distance preparation and
learning modalities adopted by the school enrichment of Learning
(3 points) Resources such as ICT-
supported Home-
Based on number of instructional materials based Learning
(IMs). Facilitators’ Toolkit (HBLF)
Toolkit, Audio and Video
• 5 or more IMs - 3.0 points Lessons, and Online and
• 4 IMs - 2.5 points Offline learning resources
• 3 IMs - 2.0 points ✓ Sample of developed
• 2 IMs - 1.5 points audioand video lessons
and conducted online
• 1 IM - 1.0 point
learning resources
10.6 Led colleagues in the interpretation and ✓ Copy of the Analysis

utilization of the following analysis reports for Report duly certified and
the improvement of the teaching and learning received by the School
process (5 points) Head
✓ Completion Report
One point for each of the analysis reports withMOVs on the
(ARs)made. activity conducted
• 5 or more ARs - 5 points

• 4 ARs - 4 points
• 1 AR - 1 point
10.7 Implemented initiatives on the alignment ✓ Picto-narrative report

ofdelivery of instruction and management of dulysigned by the school
activities in the new normal (3 points) head
• 5 or more initiatives - 3.0 points

• 4 initiatives - 2.5 points
• 1 initiative - 1.0 point

• Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree - 5.0 points ✓ Transcript of Records

• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4.0 points Certification of Units Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
• Complete Academic Requirements - 3.0 points

Participation to Learning and Development issued by DepEd or other
Note:
PRAISE committee.
Interview and essay shall be conducted
• Communication skills ✓ Potential/Interview Checklist
• Ability to present ideas & Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SPED TEACHER (TEACHER I-III, SPET 1-5)
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: _______________________ School/District/Area: _______________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
✓ Service Record
(65 points)
nominees)
nominees) or RD (for
b. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to exceed Regional Office nominees)

2.1 Conducted basic/action research approved bythe manuscript of the
DO Research Team (3 points) implemented / conducted
• District Level - 2 points Project duly approved by the
SDS
• School Level - 1 point
✓ Certification from the SDO
a. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe as to where it was conducted
b.Point/s earned is cumulative but not to


Certificate of Recognition as
a Research Presenter

be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
a. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to

DepEd or other
Note:


proposal
• Sponsored/conducted community-based
✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
feeding program, medical/dental missions, report (depicting the
tree planting, clean-up drives, and other extent to which the activity
community development activities or civic has effectively and
engagements efficiently addressed a
pressing need or
✓ Member - 2.5 points delivery/learning
outcome) with
Note: attachments: Pictorial,
written output, video,
a. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to Certificate of

and/or programs that will benefit the special programs/projects)
school ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or
MOUs, deed of donation/
Proponent/organizer - 5 points acceptance or any other
valid proof
Member - 2.5 points
Note: WFP/POW
a. For more than one proponent, point/s
earned will be divided by the number of
proponents.
7. Professional and Civic Involvement (5 points) ✓ Certification of membership
Involvement in professional/civic organization that ✓ Record of attendance of
promotes or supports the welfare of learners, the organization
teachers, PWDs and their families. ✓ Picto-narrative
✓ Supporting documents
• Serves as president or chairman of showing the organizations
the organization at the Division
objectives and goals to
level – 5 points
serve the target clientele
• Serves as an officer of the
organization at the division Level – 4 points
• Serves as president or chairman
at the school level – 3 points
• Serves as an officer at the school
level – 2 points
• Identified as a member of the
organization in any level - 1 point
8. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to the
position ✓ LP/DLL duly signed by
at least 3 authorities
✓ COT or Observation
• Served as Demonstration Teacher on innovative
teaching techniques/ pedagogies (10 points) Chart from at least 3
observer- authorities
National - 10 points
Region - 8 points
✓ Memorandum and Matrix
Division - 6 points
reflecting Demonstration
District - 4 points
School - 2 points

• SPED Instructional Materials/LRs Developed ✓ Certification from the

and Utilized in the DLDM (5 points) school head or
department head
Distributed & utilized IMs/LRs - 5 points
to 95-100% of the learners

Distributed & utilized IMS/LRs - 3 points


Distributed & utilized IMs/LRs - 1 point

• Technical Assistance on SPED to Other ✓ Photos,

Teachers, Parents/Families, Student-
✓ Text messages/chat
Teachers/SPED Specializers, Project
Partners, and Other SPED ✓ letters from
Advocates/Volunteers (5 points) stakeholders/parents,
✓ certificate of
Gave TA to multiple clients to - 5 points appreciation/recognition
more than 3 of the categories
mentioned
Gave TA to multiple clients from - 4 points

only two of the categories
mentioned above

only 1 of the categories
mentioned above
Gave TA to only one client from - 2 points

at least two of the groups
mentioned above
Gave TA to only one client in any - 1 point

of the groups mentioned above



• Length of Service and Experience (5 points) ✓ Service record

More than 5 years teaching - 5 points
experience
Five years teaching experience - 4 points
Four years teaching experience - 3 points
Three years teaching experience - 2 points
At least two years teaching - 1 point
experience

Laws (Juris Doctor)
• Complete Academic Requirements- 3 points
Note: The degree must be relevant to the SPED

and Inclusive Education Programs


✓ Participation to Learning and issued by DepEd or other
Development Activities (such as agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
trainings, seminars, workshops,
Note:
a. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to exceed
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SPED MASTER TEACHER

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________________School/District/Area: ______________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
VERIFICATION Earned
(MOVs)
signing
✓ Service Record
(65 points)
nominees)
b. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to exceed Regional Office nominees)

b.Point/s earned is cumulative but not to


Letter
• National - 1.75 points Research Presenter
• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points book/ learning
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will resources/articles
be divided ✓ Certificate of Recognition
by the
number of
authors
exceed 4
points
of LRs/IEC
be divided
by the
number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
a. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to exceed
the allotted points for the criterion
• International/National - 5 points Facilitator/ Trainer issued
• Regional - 4 points by DepEd or other
Note:
a. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to exceed the


feeding program, medical/dental missions,
report (depicting the
tree planting, clean-up drives, and other extent to which the activity
community development activities or civic has effectively and
engagements efficiently addressed a
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points pressing need or improved
✓ Member - 2.5 points service delivery/learning
outcome) with
attachments: Pictorial,
a. Point/s earned is cumulative but not to exceed the Certificate of
allotted points for the criterion. Recognition/Participation

Proponent/organizer - 5 points acceptance or any other valid
Member - 2.5 points proof
Note: ✓ Accomplishment report w/
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earned will be attachments: Pictures,
divided by the number of proponents. WFP/POW
7. Leadership in the Conduct of CB Training (5points) ✓ ACR

Serves as the organizer and a - 5 points ✓ Certification from the school
resource speaker head/department head
Serves only as an organizer - 4 points
Serves only as a speaker - 3 points
Serves as a learning facilitator - 2 points
Serves as a committee member - 1 point

position
✓ LP/DLL duly signed by at
• Served as Demonstration Teacher on innovative least 3 authorities
teaching techniques/ pedagogies (10 points) ✓ COT or Observation Chart
National - 10 points from at least 3 observer-
Region - 8 points authorities
Division - 6 points ✓ Certificate of Recognition
District - 4 points ✓ Memorandum and Matrix
School - 2 points reflecting Demonstration

• SPED Instructional Materials/LRs Developed and ✓ Certification from the school

Utilized in the DLDM (5 points) head or department head


Distributed & utilized IMS/LRs - 3 points


Distributed & utilized IMs/LRs - 1 point

• Technical Assistance on SPED to Other Teachers,

Parents/Families, Student-Teachers/SPED ✓ Photos,
Specializers, Project Partners, and Other SPED ✓ Text messages/chat
Advocates/Volunteers (5 points)
✓ letters from
stakeholders/parents,
Gave TA to multiple clients to - 5 points
more than 3 of the categories ✓ certificate of
mentioned appreciation/recognition

only two of the categories
mentioned above

only 1 of the categories
mentioned above
Gave TA to only one client from - 2 points

at least two of the groups
mentioned above
Gave TA to only one client in any - 1 point

of the groups mentioned above

• Implemented initiatives on the ✓ Picto-narrative report duly

alignment ofdelivery of instruction and signed by the school head
management of activities in the new
normal (5 points)
✓ Service record
3 initiatives - 3 points2
initiatives - 2 points
• Length of Service and Experience (5 points)
More than 5 years teaching - 5 points

experience
Five years teaching experience - 4 points
Four years teaching experience - 3 points
Three years teaching experience - 2 pointsAt
least two years teaching - 1 point
experience
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note: The degree must be relevant to the SPED and

Inclusive education Programs


✓ Participation to Learning and Participation issued by
Development Activities (such as DepEd or other
trainings, seminars, workshops, agencies/organizations
Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING MADRASAH TEACHER (ASATIDZ)

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ______________________ School/District/Area: ________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
✓ Service Record
(55 points)
Awardee in the District/ – 2 points
Note:
b.For same awards received in a school year, points
highest governance level.
nominees)
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe nominees)


be divided
by the
number of
authors
exceed
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided
by the
number of
writers
exceedLayout Artist, or Illustrator) exceed
of the Learning Resources 3 points
Note:
Appreciation as Consultant/
Facilitator/Trainer in MEP related activities
(10 points) Facilitator/ Trainer issued by
Note:

improved service
Note:
Certificate of


the position
• Outstanding/Meritorious Accomplishments as ✓ Certificate of Recognition

Coach in MUSABAQAH (20 points) ✓ Memorandum
National - 20 points
Regional - 15 points
Division - 10 points
District - 8 points
School - 5 points
• Outstanding/Meritorious Accomplishments as
Chairperson/TWG in School related activities ✓ Special Order
(5 points) ✓ Accomplishment Report duly
signed by the School Head
Chair - 5 points
Co-Chair - 3 points
Member - 2 points
At least 18 units in Masters - 10 points Certified True Copy:
College Graduate - 8 points ✓ Transcript of Records
College Level - 6 points ✓ Diploma
High School Graduate - 4 points ✓ Permanent Record
High School Level - 2 points

Note:
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING MULTIGRADE TEACHER I-III

Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
✓ Service Record
(55 points)
Note:

document with the name of
• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points the Nominee duly approved by
• Adopted in the district - 4 points the SDS (for division, district,
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points and school nominees)or RD
• Started the implementation - 2 points (for Regional Office nominees)
• Conceptualized - 1 point ✓ Certificate/Certification
division, district, and school
Note: nominees) or RD (for
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned willbe Regional Office nominees)
divided by the number of innovators.
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe


• Regional/Division Level - 3 points
Project duly approved by the
• National - 1.75 points Certificate of Recognition asa
Research Presenter

be divided by
the number
ofauthors
notcirculation not to
exceed
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number
ofwriters
Learning Resources
Note:


DepEd or other
Note:

engagements
✓ Member - 2.5 points delivery/learning outcome)

proof
Note:
WFP/POW
least 3 authorities


Coach/Contestant

• Organized Learning Action Cell (LAC)/ In- ✓ Activity Completion

ServiceTrainings/Learning and Development Reportwith attachments
activities/sessions regarding improvement such as:
of students’ learning outcomes (5 points)
o Approved SLAC
Session Plan
Area/District - 4 points o Approved permit
School - 3 points to conduct
o Sample Program
Note: o Attendance
criterion.
• Implemented initiatives on the ✓ Picto-narrative report

alignment ofdelivery of instruction and duly signed by the
management of activities in the new school head
normal (5 points)



Laws (Juris Doctor)
• Complete Academic Requirements- 3 points

sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
criterion.
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING MULTIGRADE MASTER TEACHER

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: _________________________ School/District/Area: _____________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • SY 2021-2022, SY and
• Service Record
(60 points)
• Nomination in the Department/ – 4 points issued by DepEd or other
Awardee in the Region/Awardee in the agencies/organizations
Provincial Level sanctioned by DepEd
in the Municipal Level
in the Barangay Level
Note:
• Adopted in the district - 4 points the Nominee duly approved by
• Started the implementation - 2 points and school nominees)or RD
✓ Certificate/Certification signed
Note:
district, and schoolnominees)
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned willbe or RD (for Regional Office
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe


Note: Research Committee on the
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be scope of the Research Locale
divided by the number of researchers. as to where it was conducted

Letter
• National - 1.75 points Certificate of Recognition as a
be divided
by the
number of
authors
exceed
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided
by the
number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


DepEd or other
Note:

improved service
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed Certificate of
the allotted points for the criterion. Recognition/Participation

Proponent/organizer - 5 points acceptance or any other valid
Member - 2.5 points proof

position ✓ LP/DLL duly signed by at
least 3 authorities
✓ COT or Observation Chart
• Served as Demonstration Teacher on innovative from at least 3 observer-
teaching techniques/ pedagogies (5 points) authorities
National - 5 points ✓ Certificate of Recognition
Region - 4 points Memorandum and Matrix
Division - 3 points reflecting Demonstration
District - 2 points Teaching Activity (if available)
School - 1 point


Coach/Contestant
1st Placers
2nd Placers 3rd Placers

Plan
o Resource Package
Division - 5 points o Approved permit to
Area/District - 4 points conduct
School - 3 points o Sample Program
o Attendance
Note: o Pictorials

• Implemented initiatives on the alignment of signed by the school head


5 or more mentees - 5 points


Laws (Juris Doctor)

sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL HEAD

Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ____________________School/District/Area: _________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
1. Personal and Professional Development (30%)
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last ✓ OPCRF duly signed by
2rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and authorities with date of
above) signing
• CY 2021 and , CY
Point/s Earned 2022/SY 2021-2022
= (Average of the Three OPCRF Ratings / 5) x 35 and SY 2022-2023
✓ Service Record
(40 points)

• National Awardee - 10 points Certificate of Appreciation
• Nomination in the Department/ - 8 points issued by DepEd or other
• Awardee in the Region agencies/organizations
in the Provincial Level sanctioned by DepEd
• Nomination in the Region / - 6 points
Awardee in the Division
✓ Memorandum / Advisory
in the Municipal Level with attached search criteria
• Nomination in the Division/ - 4 points
Awardee in the District/Awardee in the
Barangay Level
Note:
b.For same awards received in a calendar year,
nominees)
nominees) or RD (for Regional
Office nominees)


3.1 Conducted basic/action research approved bythe manuscript of the implemented
/ conducted Research and
Note: scope of the Research Localeas
to where it was conducted

Letter

be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
• of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Layout Artist, or Illustrator) of the 3 points
Learning Resources
Note:


Note:

proposal
• Sponsored/conducted community-based feeding
program, medical/dental missions,tree planting, ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment report
(depicting the extent to which the
clean-up drives, and other community development
activity has effectively and efficiently
activities or civic engagements addressed a pressing need or
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points improved service delivery/learning
✓ Member - 2.5 points outcome) with attachments: Pictorial,
written output, video, Certificate of
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the allotted
points for the criterion.
7. Networking/Linkages (5 points) ✓ Copy of the approved proposal
(for IGPs and otherspecial
• Initiated resource generation projects and/or programs/projects)
programs that will benefit the school
Member - 2.5 points acceptance or any other validproof
a. For more than one proponent, points earned will be divided by attachments: Pictures,
the number of proponents. WFP/POW

• Complete Academic Requirements - 9 points ✓ Certificate of Completion of
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 7 points
Laws (Juris Doctor)
• Earned at least 18 MA Units - 5 points
✓ Participation to Learning and Development Activities issued by DepEd or other
(such as trainings, seminars, workshops, agencies/organizations
• School - 2 points
Note:


b.Validity of the learning and development activities
shall be within the last 3 years from the cut-off date
• Alertness
• Judgment
2. School Management and Leadership (70%)
• To be taken from the Outstanding School
Criteria
SUMMARY:
1. Personal and Professional Development - 30%

2. School Management and Leadership - 70%
Total 100%

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ___________________ FD/School/District/Area: _______________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • CY 2021, and CY 2022
(30 points)

Awardee in the Region/ Awardee agencies/organizations
In the Provincial Level
sanctioned by DepEd
Awardee in the Division/Awardee ✓ Memorandum / Advisory
in the Municipal Level with attached search criteria
Awardee in the District/ Awardee
In the Barangay Level
• Nomination in the District/ - 2 points
Awardee in the school
Note:
nominees)


the position
3.1 Attendance and Punctuality in Reporting to ✓ Certification of the HRMO/

Office (10pts) School Head duly noted bythe
• Perfect attendance and no - 10 points Head of Office
tardiness and undertime
for three (3) consecutive
months in a year
• Two (2) authorized absences - 8 points
and tardiness for three (3)
consecutive months in a year
• Three (3) authorized absences - 6 points
and tardiness/undertime in a
year
• Five (5) authorized absences - 4 points
year
3.2 Customer Satisfaction Survey Rating (5 ✓ Customer Satisfaction Survey Results

points) (for 4 quarters of 2021 & 2022) duly
certified by SDS
✓ Customer Feedback/ Appreciation
Point/s Earned = (average of the ratings/5) x 5 (1 per quarter) –Optional
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 5 points ✓ Transcript of Records
Laws (Juris Doctor) ✓ Certificate of Completion of
• Complete Academic Requirements - 4 points Academic Requirements /
for Master’s Degree Certification of Units Earned
• Earned 18 units of Master’s Degree - 3 points
• College Graduate - 2 points
• Earned at least 18 units in college - 1 point
Note:
b. Validity of the learning and developmentactivities shall
Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT (III/II)

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • CY 2021 and CY 2022
(40 points)

Awardee in the Region/Awardee agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
in Municipal Level with attached search criteria
Awardee in the District/Awardee
in the Barangay Level
• Nomination in the District/ - 2 points
Note:
nominees)
the allotted points for the criterion. Regional Office nominees)


the position
3.2 Attendance and Punctuality in Reporting to ✓ Certification of the HRMO/

Office (10pts) School Head duly noted by
• Perfect attendance and no - 10 points the Head of Office
tardiness and undertime
for three (3) consecutive
months in a year
• Two (2) authorized absences - 8 points
and tardiness for three (3)
consecutive months in a year
• Three (3) authorized absences - 6 points
year
• Five (5) authorized absences - 4 points
year
3.3 Assisted in a training/activity conducted in

at least two days (5 points)
• Regional Level - 5 points ✓ Certificate of Recognition /

Certificate of Appreciation
• Division Level - 4 points or
• District Level - 3 points ✓ Duly approved ACR
• School Level - 2 points
3.4 Membership in Working Committees ( 5

points)
• At least three (3) Working - 5 points ✓ Special Order/Memorandum
Committees (with the name of the
• Two (2) Working Committees - 3 points Nominee)
• One (1) working committee - 1 point
3.4 Customer Satisfaction Survey Rating (5

points)
✓ Customer Satisfaction Survey
Point/s Earned = (average of the ratings/5) x 5 Results (for 4 quarters of 2021
& 2022) duly certified by SDS
✓ Customer Feedback/
Appreciation (1 per quarter) -
Optional


• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 5 points ✓ Transcript of Records
Laws (Juris Doctor) ✓ Certificate of Completion of
• Complete Academic Requirements- 4 points Academic Requirements /
for Master’s Degree Certification of Units Earned
• Earned 18 units of Master’s Degree- 3 points
• College Graduate - 2 points
• Earned at least 18 units in college - 1 point

Note:
criterion.
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER V

Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________
Position: _____________________ School/District/Area: ________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(40 points)

Awardee in the Region/Awardee
• Nomination in the Region / - 3 points sanctioned by DepEd
Awardee in the Division/ Awardee ✓ Memorandum / Advisory
In the Municipal Level with attached search criteria
Note:
nominees)


be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
• Writer/ Developer/Contextualizer
of LRs/IEC - 4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
Note:
the position
5.1 Compliance on submission of Reports ✓ Transmittal of Report with

(5 points) date of receipt of concerned
• Complete and accurate - 5 points Office/s
(submitted 7days before
deadline)
• Complete and accurate - 4 points
(submitted 6 days before
deadline)
(submitted 5 days before
deadline)
(submitted on due date)

5.2 Managed/facilitated a related ✓ Certificate of Recognition /

training/activity conducted (5 points) Certificate of Appreciation
or
✓ Duly approved Activity
• Regional Level - 5 points
Completion Report (in lieu of
• Division Level - 4 points Certificates as SDOs do not
• District Level - 3 points give Certificates)
• School Level - 2 points ✓ Memorandum
Note:
5.3 Chairmanship/Co-Chairmanship in Working ✓ Memorandum / Special

Committees/BAC/ Procurement-Related Order
(5 points)
• At least three (3) Working - 5 points
Committees
• Two (2) Working Committees - 3 points
• One (1) working committee - 2 points
5.4 Well-managed workplace and adherence to

health and safety standards (5 points) ✓ Pictures
Note: Nominee shall be rated based on ✓ Memorandum
evidence presented showing the following: ✓ Monitoring tool
1. Well-kept and clean grounds and offices
2. Wash area
3. Thermal Scanner
4. Sanitizers
5. Education, Information, and Communication
Materials/Signages on health and safety
measures
6. Memorandum/Guidelines on
implementation or compliance of
healthand safety protocols
7. Monitoring Tool
All indicators are present - 5 points

6 indicators are present - 4 points
At most 3 indicators are present - 1 point


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT OFFICER
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(45 points)
1.Outstanding Employee Award (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition /

Note:
exceedthe allotted points for the criterion.
b. For same awards received in a calendar
year,points earned shall be based on the
award received in the highest
governance level.Otherwise, points

2.Innovations (5 points) ✓ Copy of the Innovation

nominees)

• District Level - 1.5 points SDS
3.2 Presented a research paper (1 point) ✓ Memorandum / Invitation

Letter
• International - 1 point ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• National - 0.80 point Certificate of Recognition asa
• Regional - 0.60 point Research Presenter
• Division - 0.40 point
be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources

Note:
Note:
6. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific tothe
position
6.1 Recruitment, Selection and ✓ Report on Appointments

Placement/PRIME HRM (10 points) issued with the date of
• Completed RSP processes -10 points publication and
from posting to appointment appointment duly certified
within 3 months/ PRIME HRM by the SDS
Level 2 for RSP
✓ PRIME HRM Award
• Completed RSP processes -8 points
Certificate
from posting to appointment
within 4 months ✓ CSC website
• Completed RSP processes -6 points
within 5 months
• Completed RSP processes 4 points
within 6 months
✓ Transmittal of Report
6.2 Personnel Records ( 5 points) submitted
Points Efficiency Quality Timeliness Points ✓ RO record of reports

Earned submission
5 100% No error Submitted
submission before the
deadline
submission before the
deadline
submission after the
deadline
Point/s Earned = (summation of ratings) divided by the

number of required reports

6.3 Personnel Information System (5 points)

• Updated Personal Services -5 points ✓ Certification of frequency
Itemization and Plantilla of Personnel of PSIPOP updating as of
(PSIPOP) at least 3 times a month the date of nomination
• Updated Personal Services -3 points signed by the SDS
Itemization and Plantilla of Personnel
(PSIPOP) at least twice a month ✓ PSIPOP view (RO validator)
• Updated Personal Services -1 points
Itemization and Plantilla of Personnel
(PSIPOP) at least once a month
6.4 Personnel Information System (5 points)

• 100% of newly created items -5 points ✓ PMIS (RO validator)
Filled up based on Program
Management Information System
(PMIS)
• 95% - 99% of newly created -4 points
items filled up based on Program
(PMIS)
(PMIS)
(PMIS)
• 84% and below of newly -1 point
created items filled up based on
Program Management Information
System(PMIS)


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SUPPLY OFFICER
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(40 points)

Note:
exceedthe allotted points for the
criterion.
b. For same awards received in a
calendar year,points earned shall be
based on the award received in the
highest governance level.Otherwise,
points earned are cumulative.


nominees)
3.Research and Development Projects (3 points) ✓ Copy of the complete

3.1Conducted basic/action research approved by the manuscript of the
DO Research Team (1.5 points) implemented / conducted
• Regional/Division Level - 1.5points Research and Development
• District Level - 1 point
SDS
• School Level - 0.5 point
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to
3.2Presented a research paper (1.5 points) ✓ Memorandum / Invitation

• International – 1.5 points Letter
• Regional - 1.00 point Certificate of Recognition asa
• Division - 0.75point Research Presenter
be divided by
the number of
authors
1.75 points
of LRs/IEC - 1 point
• Co-Writer of LRs - 1 point will be
divided by the
number of
writers
Layout Artist, or Illustrator) of the 1.5 points
Learning Resources

Note:
5.Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning ✓ Certificate of Recognition/
Note:
position
6.1 Updated Report on the Physical Count of ✓ Transmittal of RPCPPE with

PPE and Report on Physical Count of date of receipt by COA and
Inventories (10 points) other concerned office/s
• Complete and accurate -10 points
✓ Transmittal of RPCI with
(submitted before the deadline)
date of receipt by COA and
• Complete and accurate -6 points
other concerned office/s
(submitted before the deadline)
6.2 Updated and Timely submission of ✓ Transmittal Letters of RSMI

Report of Supplies and Materials issued
(RSMI) (5 points)
• 100% submitted before -5 points
the deadline
• Submitted on the deadline -3 points
6.3 AOM Compliance (5 points) ✓ Copy of AAPSI from COA

• No (zero) AOM received -5 point
• Received and complied AOMs -3 points
2 days before deadline
• Received and complied AOMs -1 point
On due date


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING CASHIER
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(40 points)

Note:
b. For same awards received in a calendar year,
nominees)


• District Level - 2 points
SDS
• School Level - 1point
a. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe divided by as to where it was conducted
the number of researchers.
3.2Presented a research paper (2 points) ✓ Memorandum / Invitation

• International – 2 points Letter
be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


Note:
position
6.1 Cash Collection and Deposit (5 points) ✓ Report of Collection and

• 100% collection deposited -5 points Deposits/Collection Receipt
to the bank a day after receipt Record/Cash book showing
and issuance of Official Receipt Date of Collection and
• 100% collection deposited -4 points Deposits
to the bank 2 days after receipt
and issuance of Official Receipt
• 100% collection deposited -3 points
• 100% collection deposited -2 points
• 100% collection deposited -1 point
6.2 Cash Disbursement, payment, and ✓ Report of Check

Remittance (5 points) Issued/Report of ADA
• 100% of approved Disbursement -5 points Issued/Check and ADA
Vouchers were processed for Disbursement
payment and released to payees Record/Warrant Registry
within 5 days showing dates of
• 100% of approved Disbursement -4 points check/ADA preparation and
Vouchers were processed for date of release
payment and released to payees
within 6 days
• 100% of approved Disbursement -3 points
Vouchers were processed for
payment and released to payees
within 7 days
6.3 Liquidation and Reporting (5 points) ✓ Transmittal of

• 100% complete and accurate -5 points Report/Reports with date of
of required reports for Collection, submission
Disbursements and Liquidation were
submitted to Accounting Unit 2 days
before deadline

• 100% complete and accurate -4 points

of required reports for Collection,
submitted to Accounting Unit 1 day
before deadline
• 100% complete and accurate -3 points
of required reports for Collection,
submitted to Accounting Unit within
deadline

Laws (Juris Doctor)

• Participation to Learning and Development issued by DepEd or other
i. International/National - 10 points
ii. Regional - 8 points
iii. Division - 6 points
iv. District - 4 points
v. School - 2 points
Note:
c. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the
d. Validity of the learning and development
PRAISE committee.

• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING RECORDS OFFICER
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(45 points)

Note:
Implemented a systematic and scientific records document with the name of
management (e-database) the Nominee duly approved
• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points
• Adopted in the district - 4 points district, and school nominees)
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points or RD (for Regional Office
• Started the implementation - 2 points nominees)
• Conceptualized - 1 point ✓ Certificate/Certification
a. For group/team innovations, point/s nominees) or RD (for
earned willbe divided by the number of Regional Office nominees)
innovators.

exceedthe allotted points for the

criterion.

SDS
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will as to where it was conducted

4.Publication / Authorship (5 points) ✓ Copy of the published book/
be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


Note:
6.Outreach Activity (3 points) ✓ Copy of the approved
✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based feeding proposal
program, medical/dental missions, tree planting, ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
clean up drives, and other community Report (depicting the
development activities or civic engagements extent to which the activity
✓ Proponent/Organizer – 3 points has effectively and
✓ Member - 1 point efficiently addressed a
pressing need or improve
Note: service delivery/learning
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the allotted outcome) with
points for the criterion. attachments: pictorial,
Certificate of

position
✓ Customer Satisfaction
7.1 Customer Satisfaction Survey Rating (7 Survey results ( for 4
points) Quarters of 2021 and 2022)
duly certified by SDS
✓ Customer
Point/s Earned = (average of the ratings/5) x7 Feedback/Appreciation (1
per Quarter) – Optional

7.2 Linkages and Network (5 points) ✓ Memorandum

Each descriptor warrants the candidate 1 point ✓ Policy Guidelines
✓ Notice of Meetings/Minutes
1. Established Records Management of Meeting
Improvement Committee in the Division
✓ Sample Correspondences
2. Oriented/provided Technical Assistance to verified by Regional
School Registrars with Records processes ( Records
CAV, Authentication, Document, Handling)
3. Submitted Directory of School Records
Custodians, Records Officers, and Registrars
4. Follows etiquette in communication and
correspondence. Facilitated smooth
communication with Regional Records
Office by maintaining accessibility through
different means; email, phone and
messenger.
5. Created Communication Network for
Records Custodian and Registrars in the
Division
7.3 Involvement in Office Activities (5 points) ✓ Memorandum

Program Director - 5 points
Chairperson of Working Committee – 4 points ✓ Program
Program Host/ Script Writer - 3 points
Member of TWG - 2 points ✓ Photos of the Event/Activity
Participant/Attendee - 1 point

Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING LEGAL OFFICER
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(40 points)

Note:
nominees)


SDS
a. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe divided by as to where it was conducted
the number of researchers.

be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
Note:


position
6.1 Investigation conducted within a reasonable ✓ Copy of Submitted

period (10 points) Investigation Reports with
✓ 100% of endorsed complaints -10 points its attachments
are investigated and terminated
within 30 days from receipt of authority
to conduct investigation
✓ 81-99% of endorsed complaints -8 points
✓ 75-80% of endorsed complaints -6 points
✓ Copy of proof of the
6.2 Acted complaints lodged at DepEd Public action taken
Assistance Action Center (PAAC), CSC Contact
Center ng Bayan (CCB), and other Appropriate
Government Centers (5 points)
✓ 100% of referrals received -5 points

Acted within the reglementary
period
✓ 81-99% of referrals received -4 points
Period
✓ 75-80% of referrals received -3 points
period

Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
activities shall be within the last 3 years from the
cut-off date set by the Division PRAISE
committee.

• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SDO BUDGET OFFICER
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(50 points)

Note:
nominees)

Note:
Note:
position
✓ Regional Memo/Division
4.1 Membership in Technical Working Memo/Special
Group (5 points) Order/Certificates
✓ International/ National -5 points
✓ Regional - 4 points
✓ Division/Provincial - 3 points
✓ District/Municipal - 2 points
✓ School/Barangay - 1 point
4.2 Compliance with Reporting

Requirements ( 30 points)
4.2.1. Submission of Mid-year and Year-

End Reports to Central Office (5 points)
✓ Certified Status of
✓ Complete and accurate - 5 points
Submission at FD-
(on the1st day of the workshop
RO
or earlier)
(before the last day of the
workshop)
(within the submission date
set/last day of the workshop)
4.2.2. Submission of Mid-Year and Year-

End Reports to COA and DBM (5 points) ✓ Certified Status of
✓ Complete and accurate - 5 points Submission at FD-
(2 days or earlier before RO
the deadline)
(1 day before the deadline)
On the deadline set

4.2.3. Submission of Quarterly and

Monthly Reports to Central Office, COA,
DBM, and other oversight agencies (5
points)
(3 days or earlier before the
scheduled submission date)
(2 days before the
scheduled submission date set) ✓ Certified Status
✓ Complete and accurate - 3 points Submission at FD-
(1 day before the scheduled RO
Submission date set)
(on the scheduled
submission date set)
4.2.4. Budget Utilization Rate

(OBLIGATION) (5 points)
✓ BUR of 98-100% – 5 points

✓ BUR of 95-97% - 4 points ✓ Certified Status of BUR at
✓ BUR of 90-94% - 3 points RO-FD
✓ BUR of 85-89% - 2 points
✓ BUR of 84% and below - 1 point
4.2.5. Incurrence of Overdraft in Allotment

(5 points)
• Zero Overdraft - 5 points
✓ Submitted Year-end
• Overdraft of 1-2% of the - 4 points SDO Consolidated
Total Allotment per PPA Budgetary Report
• Overdraft of 3-4% of the - 3 points
Total Allotment per PPA
• Overdraft of 5-6% of the - 2 points
Total Allotment
• Overdraft of 7% and above - 1 point
of the Total Allotment
✓ Certified Report of
4.2.6. Attendance to Regional Call-Ups
Attendance at the
(5 points)
RO-FD
• Attended all Activities - 5 points
• Attended 7 Activities - 4 points
• Attended 1-4 Activities - 1 point


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SDO ACCOUNTANT
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(45 points)

Note:
c. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed
d. For same awards received in a calendar year,
nominees)
c. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will signed by the SDS (for
d. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed nominees) or RD (for

Note:
Note:
4. Other Meritorious Accomplishments
specific to the position ✓ Memorandum/Certificates/
Special Order
4.1 Membership in Organizations/
Committees (5 points)
✓ Membership in organization/technical
planning committee
3 Organizations/Committees - 5 points
2 Organizations/Committees - 3 points
1 Organization/Committee - 2 points
4.2 Compliance with Reporting

Requirements ( 25 points)
4.2.1. Submission of Mid-year and Year-

✓ Certified Status
End Financial Reports (5 points)
Report by the RO-
FD
(within 24 hours from start of
workshop)
(before the last day of the
workshop)
✓ Complete and accurate - 1 point
(within the submission date
set/last day of the workshop)
4.2.2. Submission of Monthly and

Quarterly Financial Reports every 5 th day ✓ Certified Status
of the following month/quarter (5 points) Report by the RO-
✓ Complete and accurate - 5 points FD
(3 days before the scheduled
submission date)
submission date)
✓ Complete and accurate - 1 point
(1 day before the scheduled
submission date)

4.2.3. MOOE/Other Funds Liquidation ✓ Certified Status

every 5th day of the following month (5 Report by the RO-
points) FD
✓ 100% Liquidation of School - 5 points
MOOE for the rating period
✓ 96-99% Liquidation of School - 4 points
✓ 91-95% Liquidation of School -3 points
✓ 86-89% Liquidation of School - 2 points
✓ 85% and below Liquidation - 1 point
rate
4.2.4. AOM Compliance (5 points) ✓ APPSI Validated by

COA
✓ No AOM for compliance - 5 points
✓ Compliance of 50% and above - 4 points
✓ Compliance of 30-49% - 3 points
✓ Compliance of 10-29% - 2 points
✓ Compliance of 10% and below - 1 point
4.2.5. Attendance to Regional Call Ups

(5 points) ✓ Certification of
Attendance duly
• 100% Attendance - 5 points signed by the CAO-
• 80-99% Attendance - 4 points FD
• 60-79% Attendance - 3 points
• 59% and below - 1 point

Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
d. Validity of the learning and development
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL LIBRARIAN
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 ✓ SY 2021-2022 and SY 2022-
rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) 2023 IPCRF duly signed by
authorities with the date of
Point/s Earned signing
✓ Special Order/ Memorandum
issued as to coordinatorship
or advisership duly signed by
authorities
(55 points)

Note:
points earned shall be based on the
governance level.Otherwise, points
nominees)


3.1Conducted in-depth basic/action research on manuscript of the implemented
curriculum instruction innovations approved by the / conducted Research and
RO/DO Research Team (2.5 points) Development Project duly
• Regional/Division Level - 2.5points approved by the School Head/
SDS/ RD (whichever should
• District Level - 2.0 points apply depending on the scope
• School Level - 1.5 point of the research/project
✓ Certification from the School
Note: Research Committee/ SDO/RO
a. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe Research Committee on the
divided by the number of researchers. scope of the Research Locale as
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the to where it was conducted
3.2 Presented a research paper (2.5 points) Letter
• International – 2.5 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• National - 2.0 points a Research Presenter
• Division - 1.0 point
• District/School - 0.5 point

• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points articles or
the number of ✓ Certificate of Recognition
authors
4 points
• Writer of LRs - 4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


Note:
6.Outreach Activity (5 points) ✓ Implemented
• Sponsored/conducted community-based approved proposal
i. Proponent/organizer - 5 points addressed a pressing need or
ii. Member - 2.5 points improved service
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the ✓ Certificate of
allotted points for the criterion. Recognition/ Participation
7.Networking/Linkages (5 points) ✓ Approved and
• Initiated resource generation projects implemented proposal (for
and/or programs that would support the IGPs and other special
library operations and services in the programs/projects)
implementation of the K to 12 Curriculum ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or
program (i.e. learning resources, facilities, MOUs, deed of donation/
equipment, etc.) (divided by the number of acceptance or any other valid
proponents) proof
Proponent/organizer - 5 points attachments: Pictures,
Member - 2.5 points WFP/POW
Note:
a. For more than one proponent, points earnedwill be
divided by the number of proponents.

8.Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to the

position (20 points)
8.1. Conducted School Library Activities (5 points) ✓ Memorandum/Issuances

✓ ACR with complete
10 and above activities conducted 5 pts attachments
8-9 activities conducted 4 pts
✓ Other applicable proofs
(e.g. Pictures of bulletin
4-5 activities conducted 2 pts boards, copy of the AIP,
1-3 activities conducted 1 pt etc.)
SCHOOL SCTIVITIES/PROGRAMS
Updated the Bulletin Board/Information Board to
promote School Library and Information Services
Conducted Orientation on the use of the School
Library and its services for students and teachers
Conducted regular activities that promote School
Library and information services
Conducted classroom visits to promote School
Library and information services
Use various platforms to promote School Library
and information services
Prepared annual implemented plan on School
Library operations.
Conducted/Assisted in the implementation of
Numeracy/Literacy Hubs
Conducted Library Tours/Orientation
Conducted Benchmarking activities
Conducted Library Instruction
Conducted activities relevant to LIS Month
celebration
Organized Student Organization that are helpful in
carrying out the programs/projects/activities of the
Library (i.e. Book Lovers Club, Book Enthusiast, etc.)

8.2 School Library Management (5 points)

Presence of 15 or more items 5 pts
indicated in the table below ✓ Actual documents of the
Presence of 12-14 items in the table 4 pts records management
below ✓ Physical Management to
Presence of 9-11 items in the table 3 pts be observed/inspected in
below the School
Presence of 6-8 items in the table 2 pts
below ✓ School Library Pictorials
Presence of 3-5 items or less in the 1 pt
table below
PHYSICAL / RECORDS MANAGEMENT

School Library Policy
School Library Development Plan
Staff Development Plan
Collection Development Policy/ Plan
Issuance and Records on Library Cards
Presence of an Organizational Chart
Composition of a Library Committee
Retention Program/Policy
School Library holdings inventory (purchased,
acquired through donations, disposed/disposal/
donated, repaired, lost etc.)
School Library financial report
School Library system flow chart
School Library schedule
School Library handbook
Appropriate and functional furniture
Proper lighting and ventilation
Library Statistics
Transaction records
School Library Maintenance
School Library users logbook
Adequate space
Accession records
Vertical files
Presence of Evacuation/Emergency Plan
CoVid 19 safety measures
8.3 Conducted School Reading Program

Activities (5 points)

Presence of 5 or more items indicated in 5 pts

the table below
Presence of 4 items in the table below 4 pts
Presence of 1 item or less in the table 1 pt
below
Brigada Pagbasa ✓ Memorandum/ Issuances
Book Talk
Book Shower
attachments
Story Telling
Book Nook ✓ Other applicable proofs
Reading Contest (e.g. Pictures of bulletin
Book Review boards, copy of the AIP,
Library Reading Program etc.)
Other related reading activities
✓ Memorandum/Invitation
8.4 Conducted Learning and Development
Activities (such as formal trainings: seminar, ✓ Activity Completion Report
workshop, orientation), Focus Group Discussion
(FGD), Job Embedded Learning), and LAC Sessions ✓ Coaching Documentation
to the Region/Divisions/Districts and Schools (5
✓ Travel Order
points)
5 and above - 5 points ✓ Any document that justifies
4 - 4 points the conduct of the learning
3 - 3 points and development activities
2 - 2 points
1 - 1 point

Laws (Juris Doctor)


a. Participation to Learning and issued by DepEd or other
DevelopmentActivities (such as agencies/organizations
trainings, seminars, workshops, sanctioned by DepEd
i. International/National -5 points
v. School - 1 point
Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING DIVISION LIBRARIAN
Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) authorities with the date of
signing
Point/s Earned CY 2021 and CY 2022
(55 points)

Note:
nominees)


3.1 Conducted in-depth basic/action research on manuscript of the implemented
curriculum instruction innovations approved by the / conducted Research and
RO/SDO Research Team (5 points) Development Project duly
• Regional Level - 5 points approved by the School Head/
SDS/ RD (whichever should
• Division Level - 4 points apply depending on the scope
• District/ School/ - 2 points of the research/project
municipality ✓ Certification from the School
Note: Research Committee/ SDO/RO
a. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe divided by Research Committee on the
the number of researchers. scope of the Research Locale as
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the to where it was conducted
3.2Presented a research paper (5 points) Letter
• International – 5 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• National - 4 points a Research Presenter
• District/School - 1 point

• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points articles or
authors
4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


Note:
✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based approved proposal
ii. Member - 2.5 points improved service
Note:
a. For more than one proponent, points earned will be ✓ Certificate of
divided by the number of proponents Recognition/ Participation
7.Networking/Linkages (5 points) ✓ Approved and
• Initiated resource generation projects implemented proposal (for
and/or programs that would support the IGPs and other special
library operations and services in the programs/projects)
implementation of the K to 12 Curriculum ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or
program (i.e. learning resources, facilities, MOUs, deed of donation/
equipment, etc.) (divided by the number of acceptance or any other valid
proponents) proof
Proponent/organizer - 5 points attachments: Pictures,
Member - 2.5 points WFP/POW
Note:
a. For more than one proponent, points earnedwill be
8.1. Conducted School Library Activities (5 points) ✓ Memorandum/Issuances

10 and above activities conducted 5 pts attachments
✓ Other applicable proofs
(e.g. Pictures of bulletin
4-5 activities conducted 2 pts boards, copy of the AIP,
1-3 activities conducted 1 pt etc.)

LIBRARY HUB/ DIVISION LIBRARY ACTIVITIES

Updated the Bulletin Board/Information Board to
promote School Library and Information Services
Conducted Orientation on the use of the Division
Library/ Library Hub and its services for students
and teachers, DepEd personnel and other
stakeholders.
Conducted regular activities that promote Division
Library/ Library Hub and information services
(production of leaflets/ fliers/ infographics, etc.)
Conducted classroom visits to promote Division
Library/ Library Hub and information services
Use various platforms to promote Division Library/
Library Hub and information services
Prepared annual implemented plan on Division
Library/ Library Hub operations.
8.2 Division Library/Library Hub Management (5

points)
Presence of 5 or more items indicated in 5 pts

the table below
Presence of 3 items in the table below 3 pts ✓ Actual documents of the
records management
Presence of 1 item or less in the table 1 pt ✓ Physical Management to
below be observed/inspected in
the Division Library/Library
Hub
✓ Videos / Pictorials
Brigada Pagbasa
Book Talk
Book Shower
Story Telling
Book Nook
Reading Contest
Book Review
Library Reading Program
Other related reading activities

PHYSICAL / RECORDS MANAGEMENT

Division Library/ Library Hub Policy
Division Library/ Library Hub Handbook
Division Library/ Library Hub Development Plan
Staff Development Plan
Collection Development Policy/Plan
Retention Program/ Policy
Division Library/ Library Hub Collection Inventory
(purchased, acquired through donations,
disposed/disposal/ donated, repaired, lost etc.)
Division Library/ Library Hub financial report
Division Library/ Library Hub system flow chart
Division Library/ Library Hub schedule
Transaction records (clients’ logbook, borrowers’
logbook, etc.)
Division Library/ Library Hub Maintenance
Adequate space
Accession records
Vertical files
Facilities and services for learners/clients with
special needs
CoVid 19 safety measures
8.3 Conducted Learning and Development ✓ Activity Completion Report
Activities (such as formal trainings: seminar,
workshop, orientation), Focus Group Discussion ✓ Coaching Documentation
(FGD), Job Embedded Learning), and LAC Sessions
to the Region/Divisions/Districts and Schools (5 ✓ Travel Order
points)
✓ Any document that justifies
5 and above - 5 points
the conduct of the learning
4 - 4 points
and development activities
3 - 3 points
2 - 2 points
1 - 1 point


Laws (Juris Doctor)
2.Learning and Development (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Participation

Participation to Learning and Development issued by DepEd or other
• International/National -5 points
Note:
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING REGISTRAR

Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________ School/District/Area: ____________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(45 points)
In the Provincial Level sanctioned by DepEd
• Nomination in the District/ - 1 point
Note:
nominees)


3.1Conducted basic/action research approved bythe manuscript of the
SDS

• Regional - 1.50 points Certificate of Recognition asa

be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
• Writer/Developer/Contextualizer
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
• International/National - 5 points Resource Speaker/ Learning
• Regional - 4 points Facilitator/ Trainer issued by
• Division / Provincial - 3 points DepEd or other
• District / Municipal - 2 points agencies/organizations
• School / Barangay - 1 point sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
exceed the allotted points for the criterion


improved service
✓ Member - 1 point delivery/learning outcome)

the position
7.1 Customer Satisfaction Survey Rating ✓ Customer Satisfaction
(7 points) Survey Results (for 4 quarters
of 2021 & 2022) duly
Point/s Earned = (average of the ratings/5) x 7 certified by SDS
✓ Customer Feedback/
Appreciation (1 per quarter)
–Optional
7.2 Linkages and Network (5 points) ✓ Memorandum

Each descriptor warrants the candidate 1.25 ✓ Policy Guidelines
points. ✓ Notice of Meetings/
1. Established Records Management Minutes of Meeting
Improvement Committee in the School ✓ Sample Correspondences
2. Followed DMOS in communication and verified by Regional
correspondence. Records
✓ Activity Completion
3. Facilitated smooth communication with
Report
Regional Records Office by maintaining
accessibility through different means: email,
phone, and messenger.
4. Attended meetings and convergences atthe
District, Division, and Regional Level
7.3 Involvement in Office Activities (5 points) ✓ Memorandum

Program Director - 5 points ✓ Program
Chairperson of Working Committee - 4 points ✓ Photos of the Event/
Program Host/ Script Writer - 3 points ✓ Activity
Member of TWG - 2 points
Participant/Attendee - 1 point


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING PLANNING OFFICER

Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(45 points)
Note:
exceedthe allotted points for the criterion.
b. For same awards received in a calendar
year,points earned shall be based on the
governance level. Otherwise, points


nominees)
c. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will signed by the SDS (for
d. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed nominees) or RD (for
Note:
4. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific ✓ Regional Memo/Division

to the position Memo/Special
4.1 Membership in the Technical Working Group Order/Certificates
(5 points)
• Division / Provincial - 3 points
4.2 Compliance with Reporting Requirement

(25 points) ✓ Certified Status of
Submission at PPRD
4.2.1 Submission of Report to Central Office and
other oversight agencies (5 points)
✓ Teacher Deployment Report

• Submitted all required reports - 5 points
3 days before the deadline
• Submitted all required reports - 3 points ✓ Certified Status of
1 day before the deadline Submission at PPRD
on the deadline

4.2.2 PMIS Updating Status (5 points) Submission at PPRD
• Quarters 1-4 Completed - 5 points

• Quarters 1 Completed - 2points
4.2.3 Submission of Report to the Regional Submission at PPRD
Office (5 points)
✓ Budget Proposal and Physical Plan

(BED2)

(submitted 3 days earlier before
the scheduled submission date)
(submitted 2 days earlier before
(submitted 1 day before
(submitted on the scheduled
submission date)
4.2.4 LIS Updating Rate of Accomplishment ✓ Certified Status of

(5 points) EOSY and BOSY at
PPRD
• EOSY and BOSY of 100% - 5 points
• EOSY and BOSY of 95-99% - 4 points
• EOSY and BOSY of 90-94% - 3 points
• EOSY and BOSY of 85-89% - 2points
• EOSY and BOSY of 84% and below - 1 point
4.2.5 Attendance to Regional Call-Ups

(5 points)
• 100% Attendance - 5 points ✓ Certified Report of

• 90 -99% Attendance - 4 points Attendance at PPRD
• 80-89% Attendance - 3 points
• 70-79% Attendance - 2points
• 60-69% Attendance - 1 point


1.Education (5 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
criterion.
from the cut-off date set by the
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICER

Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(55 points)
Note:

• Conceptualized - 6 points or RD (for Regional Office
nominees)

3.Consultant/Resource ✓ Certificate of Recognition/

points) Resource Speaker/ Learning
• School / Barangay - 2 points
Note:
Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
b. Validity of the learning and developmentactivities
shall be within the last 3 years from the cut-off
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ENGINEER

Name of Nominee: ___________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(40 points)
Note:

nominees)

3.Publication / Authorship (5 points) ✓ Copy of the published

be divided by learning resources/ IEC
authors
4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
Note:
5.Other Meritorious Accomplishments ✓ Approved Program of Work

specific to the position
5.1 Completion of required Program

of Work (10 pts)
✓ Complete and accurate submitted - 10 points
before deadline
✓ Complete and accurate submitted - 5 points
on deadline
5.2 Submission of Reports (10 pts)

✓ Transmittal
✓ 100% of required reports - 10 points
Submitted before deadline
✓ 100% of required reports - 5 points
Submitted on deadline


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
d. Validity of the learning and developmentactivities
shall be within the last 3 years from the cut-off
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER

Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________________________ FD: ________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned CY 2021 and CY 2022
(50 points)

sanctioned by DepEd
Barangay Level
Note:

• Conceptualized - 2 points for RD (for Regional Office
Nominees)
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed nominees) for RD (for
the allotted points for the criterion. Regional Office Nominees)


3.1 Conducted basic/action research approved bythe manuscript of the implemented
scope of the Research Localeas
Note: to where it was conducted
the allotted points for the criterion. ✓ Memorandum / Invitation
Letter
3.2 Presented a research paper (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• International - 5 points Certificate of Recognition as a
Research Presenter
• National - 4 points
be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
• Writer/Developer/Contextualizer
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
• International/National - 10 points Resource Speaker/ Learning
• Division/Provincial - 6 points DepEd or other
• District/Municipal - 4 points agencies/organizations
• School/Barangay -2 points sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
• a. Points earned are cumulative but not to


the position
6.1 Provided Technical Assistance (TA) to ✓ TA plan
identified priority schools (5 points) ✓ Deployment report log
✓ TA report
• 95% - 100% of the - 5 points
identified priority schools
were provided with TA
within the quarter
• 90% - 94% of the - 4 points
within the quarter
• 85% - 89% of the - 3 points
within the quarter
• 80% - 84% of the - 2 points
within the quarter
• 79% - 75% of the - 1 point
within the quarter
6.2 Designed capacity building activities based ✓ Copy of the approved

on identified learning needs (5 points) Program Design
✓ Copy of the report on the
• Designed and implemented - 5 points identified learning
5 capacity building activities needs/gaps/research-based
based on identified learning data addressed by the
needs capacity building activity
• Designed and implemented - 4 points ✓ Activity Completion Report
4 capacity building activities (ACR)
based on identified learning ✓ M & E results
needs
• Designed and implemented - 3 points
3 capacity building activities
based on identified learning
needs
• Designed and implemented - 2 points
2 capacity building activities
needs
• Designed and implemented - 1 point
1 capacity building activity
needs


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SENIOR EDUCATION PROGRAM SPECIALIST

(Human Resource Development)
Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________________________ FD: ________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(70 points)
Regional PRAISE committee.

sanctioned by DepEd
Barangay Level
Note:


• Fully implemented - 3 points by the SDS (for division,
nominees)
nominees)

be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
of LRs - 4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:

DepEd or other
Note:

5.Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to the ✓ Copy of the approved

position (50 points) personal and professional
development proposal
5.1Outreach Activity (5 points)
report (depicting the extent
• Sponsored/conducted community-based to which the activity has
personal and professional development effectively and efficiently
programs addressed a pressing need
i. Proponent/organizer - 5 points with attachments like
ii. Member - 2.5 points pictures etc)
✓ Certificate of
Note: Recognition/Participation
5.2 Conducted basic/action research approvedby ✓ Certificate of Completion

the DO Research Team (5 points) (attach copy of the finished
action/basic research)
• Finished basic/action research - 5 points ✓ Certification signed by the
• Started the implementation - 4 points SDS/ASDS specifying the
• Approved basic/action research - 3 points extent of the implementation
proposal (attach copy of the approved
• Conceptualized a basic/action - 2 points basic/action research
research proposal)
✓ Certification signed by the
SDS/ASDS specifying the
approved basic/action
research for implementation
(attach copy of the approved
basic/action research
proposal)
Copy of the basic/action
research proposal
5.3 Provided Technical Assistance (TA) to ✓ Annual TA plan

identified priority schools (5 points) ✓ TA report
Percentage of School Heads who were Point/s

provided Technical Assistance (TA) as Earned
identified in Annual TA Plan
90%- 100% 5 points
80%- 89% 4 points
70%- 79% 3 points
60%- 69% 2 points
50%- 59% 1 point

5.4 Implemented Recognized Professional

Development Programs based on ✓ Copy of the Certificate of
identified learning needs (5 points) Recognition
(ACR)
Number of Implemented Point/s
Recognized Professional Earned
Development Programs
At least 3 5 points
2 3 points
1 1 point
5.5 Submitted Recommendations for policy ✓ Program Implementation

directions in the formulation of HRD Review (PIR) Report duly
programs to RO/CO (5 points) signed by the SDS
Number of submitted policy Point/s

recommendations Earned
At least 3 5 points
2 3 points
1 1 point
5.6 Coordinated the screening and selection

✓ Division Memorandum
of applicants with SDO Management to
issued as to the screening
arrive at a final list/pool of scholar (5 points)
and selection of scholars
✓ SDO Pool of Scholars
Point/s
Earned
SDO has pool of scholars for 5 points
teaching and non-teaching
personnel
SDO has pool of scholars for 3 points
teaching and non-teaching
personnel only
5.7 Coordinated the implementation of the

succession planning system to create a candidate ✓ Succession plan signed by
pool for critical position in the SDO (5 points) the SDS
* Approved succession plan – 5 points
5.8 Reviewed, proposed, and coordinated the

implementation of reward and recognition ✓ Copy of the CSC-evaluated
programs (5 points) PRAISE system manual of the
SDO or PRAISE System
* CSC-evaluated PRAISE system Manual - 5 points Manual of the SDO
of the SDO

* SDO has a PRAISE system Manual - 3 points

but not CSC-evaluated
5.9 Facilitated the Registration of DepEd NEAP- ✓ Report on DepEd NEAP-

issued Sim Card (5 points) issued Sim Card Registration
(to be provided by HRDD)
Percentage of Registered Sim Earned
Card Point/s
91%-100% 5 points
81%-90% 4 points
71%-80% 3 points
61%-70% 2 points
At most 60% 1 point
5.10 Facilitated the Updating of the PDIS profile

✓ Report on the Updating of
of teachers (5 points)
the PDIS profile of teachers
(to be provided by HRDD)
Percentage of Registered Sim Earned
Card Point/s
91%-100% 5 points
81%-90% 4 points
71%-80% 3 points
61%-70% 2 points
At most 60% 1 point

Laws (Juris Doctor)

✓ Participation to Learning and DevelopmentActivities issued by DepEd or other
Note:
b. Validity of the learning and developmentactivities shall be
within the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by the Division
PRAISE committee.

Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment


(School Management Monitoring, and Evaluation)
Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________________________ FD: ________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(45 points)
Awardee in the Region/ Awardee
• Nomination in the Division/ - 1 point
Barangay Level
Note:
b. For same awards received in a calendar year,points
earned shall be based on the award
received in the highest governance level.Otherwise, points

nominees)


be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
• Writer/ Developer/Contextualizer - 4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
4.Consultant/Resource ✓ Certificate of Recognition/

points) Resource Speaker/ Learning
• Regional - 4 points sanctioned by DepEd
• Division / Provincial - 3 points
Note:
feeding program, medical/dental ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
missions, tree planting, clean-up drives, report (depicting the extent
and other community development to which the activity has
activities or civil engagements effectively and efficiently
ii. Member - 2.5 points improve service delivery/
learning outcome with
attachments: pictorial,
Note: written output, video)

✓ Copy of the Contextualized

6. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific
Division M&E System
✓ Division Memorandum/
6.1 Facilitated the institutionalization of Division Issuance relative to the
M&E System through Orientation of conduct of the orientation
personnel and organization of functional ✓ Copy of the Activity
structures (5 points) Completion Report (ACR)
on the conduct of the
• Division, District & School Level - 5 points orientation
• Division and District - 4 points ✓ Copy of the M&E
• Division Level only - 3 points organizational structure
with the defined roles and
accountabilities
6.2 Consistently facilitated the effective ✓ Copy of the Division M&E

conduct of Division Monitoring, reports (Quarterly and
Evaluation, Adjustment (DMEA) for the Year-end)
last two years (5 points)
• Quarterly conducted with Year-end - 5 points

accomplishment of 100%
accomplishment of 95.00% to 99.9%
• Quarterly conducted with Year-end - 1 point
accomplishment of 76.99% or below
Note:
1. Average of the points earned every year shall be
considered as the final rating to this indicator
6.3 Provided Technical Assistance (TA) to ✓ Copy of the approved TA

identified priority schools in the Design/Plan
implementation School MEA during the ✓ Copy of the report on the
previous year (3 points) identified
needs/gaps/research -based
• 100% of the identified priority schools - 3.0 points
data addressed by the TA
were provided with TA within the quarter
activity provided
• 85%- 99% of the identified priority - 2.5 points
schools were provided with TA within
(ACR)
the quarter
✓ M&E Results
• 75%- 84% of the identified priority - 2.0points
the quarter
• 60%- 74% of the identified priority - 1.5 points

the quarter
• 50%- 59% of the identified priority - 1.0 point
the quarter
• Below 50% of the identified priority - 0.5 point
the quarter
✓ Documentation of the
6.4 Facilitated the utilization of Division M&E practices where utilization of
results (2 points) M&E results is evident
Rating will be based on the presence of the
following practices where M&E Results are
evidently utilized.
a. Provision of Technical Assistance
b. Policy recommendations and/or
formulation of localized policies
c. Research study/ies
d. Enhancement of implemented processes
e. Developing/designing innovations
If five (5) of the practices are evident - 2.0 points

If four (4) of the practices are evident - 1.6 points
If three (3) of the practices are evident - 1.2 points
If two (2) of the practices are evident - 0.8 point
If only one (1) of the practices are evident - 0.4 point

Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.

Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment


(PLANNING AND RESEARCH)
Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________________________ FD: ________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(45 points)

• Nomination in the Division/ - 1 point
Barangay Level
Note:
received in the highest governance level.Otherwise,
points earned are cumulative.

nominees)
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned signed by the SDS (for
will be divided by the number of innovators. division, district, and school


be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
of LRs - 4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:

Note:

feeding program, medical/dental ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
missions, tree planting, clean-up drives, report (depicting the extent
and other community development to which the activity has
activities or civil engagements effectively and efficiently
• Proponent/organizer - 5 points addressed a pressing need or
• Member - 2.5 points improve service delivery/
learning outcome with
attachments: pictorial,
Note: written output, video)

✓ Certificate of Completion
6.Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to
(attach copy of the
the position (15 points)
finished research)
6.1 Conducted basic/action research in ✓ Certification signed by the
relation to basic education data, policy SDS/ASDS specifying the
implementation, and/or research extent/scope of the
management (5 points) implementation (attach
copy of the approved
• Finished a research on basic education - 5 points basic/action research
data, policy implementation, and/or proposal)
✓ Certification signed by the
research management SDS/ASDS specifying the
• Started the implementation of a - 4 points approved basic/action
Research on basic education data, research for
policy implementation, and/or implementation (attach
research management copy of the approved
basic/action research
• Approved research proposal on - 3 points proposal)
research on basic education data, ✓ Copy of the basic/action
policy implementation, and/or research proposal
research management
• Conceptualized a research on basic - 2 points
education data, policy implementation,
and/or research management
6.2 Provided Technical Assistance (TA) to

✓ TA Plan
priority schools, learning centers, and
personnel based on the identified needs in ✓ Memorandum of the TA
relation to planning, updating of activity/deployment
Data/Information Requirements on the Basic ✓ TA report
Education Information System (BEIS)/ Learner
Information System (LIS), research
management, and other matters on
governance and operations (5 points)
• 95% -100% of the identified priority - 5 points

schools, learning centers, and
personnel were provided with TA
within the quarter
within the quarter
within the quarter
within the quarter

• 79% -75% of the identified priority - 1 point

within the quarter
6.3Prepared the Division research agenda ✓ Activity Completion Report

based on Basic Education Research Agenda (ACR) for the Workshop on the
(BERA) guidelines and monitored its Development of the Division
implementation (5 points) Research Agenda
✓ Copy of the memorandum of
• Prepared the Division research agenda - 5 points the approved Division
based on the 4 BERA core themes and Research Agenda based on the
BERA Themes
3 cross-cutting themes and monitored
✓ M&E results on the
its implementation implementation of the
• Prepared the Division research agenda - 4 points approved Division Research
based on the 3 BERA core themes and Agenda
its implementation
• Prepared the Division research agenda - 3 points
based on the 2 BERA core themes and
its implementation
• Prepared the Division research agenda - 2 points
based on the 1 BERA core themes and
its implementation
• Prepared the Division research agenda - 1 point
Based on the 3 cross-cutting themes
and monitored its implementation
6.4Led in the design, coordination, and ✓ Memorandum of Activity

planning of research studies as identified in ✓ Activity Completion Report
MEA and TA reports Division research agenda (ACR)
(5 points) ✓ Validated list of researches
conducted as a result of
• Conducted 2 coordination/planning - 5 points coordination/planning
meetings or conferences with division, meeting
district, and school personnel on the
conduct of research studies in relation
to basic education data, policy
implementation, and/or research
management
• Conducted 1 coordination/planning - 4 points
meeting or conference with division,
district, and school personnel on the
conduct of research studies in relation


management
meeting or conference with division,
and district, on the conduct of
research studies in relation
management.
meeting or conference with district,
and school research coordinators/
personnel on the conduct of
research studies in relation
management.
• Conducted 1 coordination/planning - 1 point
meeting or conference with school,
research coordinators/ personnel
on the conduct of research studies
in relation to basic education data
policy implementation, and/or
research management.

Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.

Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment


(Social Mobilization and Networking)
Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________________________ FD: ________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(70 points)

Barangay Level
Note:
highest governance level.Otherwise, points earned
are cumulative.
nominees)
willbe divided by the number of innovators. division, district, and school


be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
of LRs - 4 points
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
4.1 Awardee for Outstanding Implementation
for the last 3 years (5 points)
Governance Level Award Point/s Earned
st
1 5 points
National
2nd 4 points
st
1 3 points
Regional nd
2 2 points
st
Division 1 1 point
Note:
a. Point/s earned are cumulative but not to exceed the
4.2 Advocacy (print/online/etc.) (10 pts)

Initiated advocacy programs/projects/activities in ✓ Copy of the advocacy
various modalities for the last 3 years (e.g. leaflets, materials (hard copy or
streamers, posters, radio/tv advertisements, etc.) Screenshots/Pictures)
No. of advocacies Point/s Earned ✓ Audio-Video Recording/s (if
initiated applicable)
5 and above 10 points
4 8 points
3 6 points
2 4 points
1 2 points

4.3 Networking/Linkages (20 points) ✓ Approved

Approved Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) MOA/MOU/DOD/DOA/
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)/Deed of Contract
Donation (DOD) Deed of Acceptance (DOA)
/Contract as initiated by the nominee
attachments: Pictures
No. of MOA/MOU/DOD/DOA Point/s Earned
(ACR)
approved, implemented, and
monitored
5 20 points
4 16 points
3 12 points
2 8 points
1 4 points
Note:
1. MOA/MOU/DOD/DOA/Contract shall be counted from
January to November of the Calendar Year
4.4 Regular Updating and compliance of

schools in the DepEd Partnerships Data-Base
System (DPDS) (20 points)
Percentage of compliance Points

90-100% 20 points
75-89% 16 points
51-74% 12 points
Less than 50 percent 8 points
Note:
a. Percentage of compliance is the average of
✓ Complete screenshots of the
compliance of the SDO for 11 months from
dashboards for the Calendar
January to November of the current Calendar Year
Year

Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
PRAISE committee.
Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING EDUCATION PROGRAM SPECIALIST

Name of Nominee: __________________________________________________________________
Position: ________________________________ FD: ________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(40 points)

sanctioned by DepEd
Barangay Level
Note:

• Fully implemented - 6 points by the SDS (for division
• Started the implementation - 4 points nominees) or RD (for
• Conceptualized - 2 points Regional Office nominees)
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will division nominees)
be divided by the number of innovators.


manuscript of the implemented
Note: scope of the Research Localeas
to where it was conducted

• National - 4 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• Regional - 3 points Research Presenter
be divided by the number of authors learning resources/IEC
• Article published in a journal/ - 1 point per ✓ Certificate of Recognition
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:

Facilitator/Trainer/Webinar Moderator/Host/Co- Appreciation as Consultant/
host (10 points) Resource Speaker/ Learning
• Division/Provincial - 6 points
• District/Municipal - 4 points
• School/Barangay - 2 points
Note:


Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING NURSE

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(35 points)

sanctioned by DepEd
Barangay Level
Note:

nominees)
be divided by the number of innovators. ✓ division, district, and school


authors
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
DepEd or other
Note:
the position
5.1 Assisted in the Division Initiatives undertaken ✓ Memorandum

in the implementation of the 6 flagship ✓ Activity Completion Report
programs under the School Health and
Nutrition Section in the New Normal (5 ✓ Screenshots/Pictures/Videos
points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition/
Appreciation
• 6 or more initiatives - 5 points
• 5 initiatives - 4 points
• 1 -2 initiatives - 1 point

5.2 Assistance in the conduct of training/ activity

School Health & Nutrition activities (5 points)
• Assisted in the conduct of - 5 points ✓ Certificate of

Division activities Recognition/Appreciation
• Assisted in the conduct of - 3 points
District activities
• Assisted in the conduct of - 1 point
School activities
5.3 Submission of required reports (5 points)

• 100% of required reports - 5 points ✓ Transmittal
submitted before deadline
• 100% of required reports - 3 points
submitted on deadline
Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING MEDICAL OFFICER

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(35 points)

sanctioned by DepEd
Barangay Level
Note:

nominees)
a. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will ✓ division, district, and school
be divided by the number of innovators. nominees) or RD (for
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed Regional Office nominees)


authors
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
DepEd or other
Note:

the position
5.1 Division Initiatives focusing on Dental ✓ Memorandum

Health undertaken in the Implementation of ✓ Activity Completion Report
the 6 flagship programs under School ✓ Screenshots/Pictures/Videos
Health and Nutrition Section in the New
Normal (5 points)

• 1-2 initiatives - 1 point

5.2 Conducted/spearhead training/activity on

School Dental Health & Nutrition
(5 points)
• Division Level - 4 points

✓ Duly received Transmittal

Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING DENTIST

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(35 points)

Barangay Level
Note:

nominees)
c. For group/team innovations, point/s earned will division, district, and school
be divided by the number of innovators. nominees)
d. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed


be divided by
the number of
authors
4 points
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
Note:

the position
5.1Division Initiatives focusing on Dental ✓ Memorandum

Health undertaken in the Implementation of ✓ Activity Completion Report
the 6 flagship programs under School ✓ Screenshots/Pictures/Videos
Health and Nutrition Section in the New
Normal (5 points)

• 1-2 initiatives - 1 point

5.2 Conducted/spearhead training/activity on

School Dental Health & Nutrition
(5 points)
• Division Level - 4 points

✓ Transmittal

Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
d.Validity of the learning and development
committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SUPERVISOR (EPSpvrs, PSDSs)

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: ____________________ FD/District/Area: ______________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
(60 points)

• National Awardee -10 points Certificate of Appreciation
Awardee in the Division/Awarde6 ✓ Memorandum / Advisory
• Nomination in the Division/ -4 points
Barangay Level
Note:
highest governance level.Otherwise, points earned
are cumulative.

• Adopted in the region/division -10 points document with the name of
• Fully implemented in the school – 6 points by the SDS (for division,
• Conceptualized - 2 points or RD (for Regional Office
nominees)

3.Research and Development Projects (10 points) ✓ Copy of complete manuscript

of the implemented/conducted
• Regional/Division Level - 5 points SDS
• School Level - 1 point Research committee on the
c. For group/team research, point/s earned willbe
d.Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed
3.3 Presented a research paper (5 points) ✓ Memorandum/Invitation Letter

• International - 5 points ✓ Certificate of
Appreciation/Certificate of
Recognition as a Research
• Regional - 3 points Presenter
4.Publication / Authorship (5 points)

• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will
be divided by
the number of
authors
✓ Copy of the published
circulation not to exceed book/articles or
4 points developed/contextualized
• Writer/Developer/Contextualizer - 4 points learning resources/IEC
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
allotted points for the criterion


• International/ National - 5 points Resource Speaker/ Learning
• School/Barangay - 1 point sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
6. Networking /Linkages (5 points)

✓ Initiated networking/partnership projects and/or
programs that will benefit the Office
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points ✓ Copy of the approved (for

✓ Member - 2.5 points IGPs and other special
programs/projects)
Note:
✓ Copy of partnership MOAs
a. For more than one proponent, points earned will be
or MOUs, deed of
donation/acceptance or any
other valid proof
attachment: Pictures,
WFP/POW

position
7.1 Conduct of Professional Development

Programs (10 points) ✓ Implemented approved
✓ Conducted professional development proposal
program/activity that addressed the needs of ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
the teachers/school heads related to the PAPs report (depicting the extent
supervised/coordinated
to which the activity has
✓ Proponent/organizer -10 points effectively and efficiently
✓ Member - 5 points addressed or improved
service delivery/learning
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to outcome) with attachments:
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. Pictorial, written output,
video, Certificate of
✓ Memorandum for the
conduct of the
program/activity
7.2 Implemented a Region/Division/District-wide ✓ Special Order as focal

action plan that has been recognized by the person/coordinator
community to have improved the delivery of the

DepEd recognized Program, Project, and Activity

(PAPs) (5 points)
✓ Adopted in the Region - 5 points ✓ Approved Action Plan
✓ Adopted by/in the - 4 points ✓ Accomplishment Report
District/Division
✓ Shared/disseminated - 3 points
✓ Fully implemented - 2 points ✓ Memorandum
✓ Conceptualized - 1 point ✓ Evidence showing positive
impact of the action plan
Note:
C. Education & Learning and Development

(10 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
b. Validity of the learning and developmentactivities shall
be within the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by
the Division PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ASSISTANT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • SY 2021-2022 and CY
✓ Service Record
(70 points)

• Nomination in the Department/ -4 points issued by DepEd or other
Barangay Level
Note:
b. For same awards received in a calendar year,points earned
shall be based on the award received in the highest
governance level.Otherwise, points earned are cumulative.

nominees)


3.1Conducted basic/action research approved bythe DO of the implemented/conducted
Research Team (3 points) Research and Development
SDS
3.2Presented a research paper (2 points) ✓ Memorandum/Invitation Letter

• National - 1.75 points Recognition as a Research
• Regional - 1.50 points Presenter

• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points ✓ Copy of the published
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will book/articles or
be divided by developed/contextualized
the number of learning resources/IEC
authors
newspaper/ magazine of wide article but not ✓ Special Order as member of the
circulation not to exceed Development/Quality Assurance
4 points Team
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
• Regional - 4 points Facilitator/ Trainer signed
• Division/Provincial - 3 points by DepEd or other
Note:

6. Outreach Activity (5 points)

✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based feeding ✓ Copy of the approved
program, medical/dental missions, tree planting, clean-up
drives, and other community development activities or proposal
civic engagements ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
✓ Proponent/organizer -5 points to which the activity has
addressed a pressing need
Note:
or improved service
points for the criterion
written output, video
✓ Certificate of
7.Networking/Linkages (5 points)
✓ Initiated resource generation projects and/or programs ✓ Copy of the approved
that will benefit the school proposal (for IGPs and other
✓ Proponent/organizer -5 points special programs/projects)
✓ Member - 2.5 points ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs
or MOUs, deed of
donation/acceptance or any
Note:
other valid proof
points for the criterion ✓ Accomplishment report w/
b. For more than one proponent, points earned will be divided attachments: Pictures, WFP,
by the number of proponents. POW

8.1 Instructional Supervision (IS) (5 points) ✓ Validated Instructional
Teachers were supervised, coached, and mentored on Supervisory Report/Monthly
the following K to 12 curriculum Implementation
Accomplishment Report
practices based on monthly supervisory plan:
a. DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation
b. Designing assessment tools/items
c. Analyzing assessment results
d. Regular updating of school forms
e. Classroom Observation using PPST-COT
f. ITC Integration
g. Adopting appropriate teaching methodologies and
learning delivery modes
Number of the above cited Points Earned

practices are evident in the conduct
of IS

7 5 points
5-6 4 points
3-4 3 points
1-2 2 points
8.2 Provision of L & D (5 points)

Number of hours LAC ✓ Memorandum
sessions are conducted in Number of INSETs Points ✓ LAC Plan approved by the
the department/grade level Conducted in a year Earned School Head/District
per month Supervisor/Approving
8 hours 2 5 points Authority of the SDO
8 hours 1 4 points ✓ ACR, Impact evaluation, and
other M&E Tools
6-7 hours 1 3 points
✓ Certificate of
Recognition/Appreciation
2-3 hours 0 1 point
8.3 Attendance of staff to National, Regional,

Division, District Level Virtual or Face-to-Face
✓ IPPD/Department Training
seminar, workshops, and trainings (5 points)
Needs as approved by
Point/s Earned School Head
= No. of staff who attended seminar/trainings divided ✓ Training Matrix
by total number of staff) x allotted points
✓ Memorandum
✓ Certificate of Participation
8.4 Percentage of Learners in the department who

Completely Complied the SLMs/LAS (5 points)
✓ Distribution and retrieval
Log Sheet/s
Percentage of Learners in the Point/s Earned
department who have completely ✓ Validated SMEA Report
complied the SLMs or LAS
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
85% - 94% 3 points
75% - 84% 2 points
74% and below 1 point
8.5 Served as coach to other teachers (5 points)

✓ Certification as a coach by
Percentage of the number of Point/s Earned the School Head
coachee/s as reflected in the
Coaching Plan ✓ Coaching Plan
90% -100% 5 points ✓ Coaching Completion
80% - 89% 4 points Report
70% - 79% 3 points
60% - 69% 2 points
8.6 Empowered teachers to

conduct/conceptualized action/basic research ✓ Certification from the
(5 points) Division Research
Committee that the teachers

Point/s Earned = (No. of teachers in the department conducted/conceptualized

who have conceptualized/conducted action/basic
research divided by total Number of teachers in the
action/basic research
department) x 5
8.7 SBM Level of Practice (5 points)

✓ Certification/Certificate
✓ Level 3 - 5 points
issued by FTAD/QAD or
✓ Level 1 - 1 point SDO SBM Team as to the
SBM Level of Practice

(10 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)

• International/National – 5 points
Note:
PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING JHS HEAD TEACHER/DEPARTMENT HEAD

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • SY 2021-2022 and CY
✓ Service Record
(70 points)

Barangay Level
Note:

nominees)
willbe divided by the number of innovators. ✓ division, district, and school
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to nominees) or RD (for
exceedthe allotted points for the criterion. Regional Office nominees)


3.1Conducted basic/action research approved bythe DO of the implemented/conducted
SDS
• National - 1.75 points Appreciation/Certificate of
• Regional - 1.50 points Recognition as a Research
Presenter

be divided by
the number of
developed/contextualized
authors learning resources/IEC
4 points Team
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:
• Regional - 4 points Facilitator/ Trainer signed
• Division/Provincial - 3 points by DepEd or other
Note:
a.Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the


✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based feeding
drives, and other community development activities or ✓ Copy of the approved
civic engagements proposal
✓ Proponent/organizer -5 points report (depicting the extent
Note:
or improved service
✓ Certificate of
✓ Initiated resource generation projects and/or programs
that will benefit the school ✓ Copy of the approved
proposal (for IGPs and other
✓ Proponent/organizer -5 points
special programs/projects)
✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs
or MOUs, deed of
Note: donation/acceptance or any
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the allotted other valid proof
b. For more than one proponent, points earned will be divided ✓ Accomplishment report w/
by the number of proponents. attachments: Pictures, WFP,
POW

8.2 Instructional Supervision (IS) (5 points)
Teachers were supervised, coached, and mentored on ✓ Validated Instructional
the following K to 12 curriculum Implementation Supervisory Report/Monthly
practices based on monthly supervisory plan: Accomplishment Report
a. DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation
f. ITC Integration
Number of the above cited Points Earned

practices are evident in the conduct
of IS
7 5 points
5-6 4 points
3-4 3 points
1-2 2 points

8.2 Provision of L & D (5 points)
Number of hours LAC

✓ Memorandum
sessions are conducted in Number of INSETs Points
✓ LAC Plan approved by the
the department/grade level Conducted in a year Earned
School Head/District
per month Supervisor/Approving
8 hours 1 4 points ✓ ACR, Impact evaluation, and
6-7 hours 1 3 points other M&E Tools
4-5 hours 1 2 points ✓ Certificate of
2-3 hours 0 1 point Recognition/Appreciation
8.3 Attendance of staff to National, Regional,

Division, District Level Virtual or Face-to-Face
seminar, workshops, and trainings (5 points) ✓ IPPD/Department Training
Needs as approved by
Point/s Earned
= No. of staff who attended seminar/trainings divided School Head
by total number of staff) x allotted points ✓ Training Matrix
✓ Memorandum
✓ Certificate of Participation
8.4 Percentage of Learners in the department who
Completely Complied the SLMs/LAS (5 points)
✓ Distribution and retrieval
Percentage of Learners in the Point/s Earned Log Sheet/s
department who have completely
✓ Validated SMEA Report
complied the SLMs or LAS
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
85% - 94% 3 points
75% - 84% 2 points
8.5 Served as coach to other teachers (5 points)
Percentage of the number of Point/s Earned ✓ Certification as a coach by

coachee/s as reflected in the the School Head
Coaching Plan ✓ Coaching Plan
90% -100% 5 points
✓ Coaching Completion
80% - 89% 4 points
70% - 79% 3 points Report
60% - 69% 2 points
8.6 Empowered teachers to

conduct/conceptualized action/basic research ✓ Certification from the
(5 points) Division Research
Point/s Earned = (No. of teachers in the department Committee that the teachers
who have conceptualized/conducted action/basic conducted/conceptualized
research divided by total Number of teachers in the action/basic research

department) x 5
8.7 SBM Level of Practice (5 points)
✓ Certification/Certificate
✓ Level 2 - 3 points issued by FTAD/QAD or
✓ Level 1 - 1 point SDO SBM Team as to the
SBM Level of Practice

(10 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
a.Points earned are
cumulative but not to
exceed the allotted
points for the
criterion.
3. Validity of the learning and developmentactivities
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING DIVISION LR PDO II

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 30
✓ Service Record
(55 points)

• Nomination in the Division/ 2 points
Barangay Level
• Nomination in the District/ 1 point
Note:
nominees)


3.1Conducted in-depth basic/action research on manuscript of the
curriculum instruction innovations approved by RO implemented/conducted
RD
• Division Level - 4 points ✓ Certification from the RO
• Area/municipality - 2 points Research Committee on the

• National - 4 points Recognition as a Research
• Regional - 3 points Presenter

be divided by
the number of
developed/contextualized
authors learning resources/IEC
4 points Team
of LRs/IEC
be divided by
the number of
writers
Learning Resources
Note:


Note:

✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based feeding
✓ Implemented approved
drives, and other community development activities or proposal
civic engagements ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
Note: addressed a pressing need
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the or improved service
allotted points for the criterion delivery/learning outcome)
✓ Certificate of
✓ Initiated resource generation projects and/or programs
that will benefit the school ✓ Approved and implemented
proposal (for IGPs and other
special programs/projects)
✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs
or MOUs, deed of
Note: donation/acceptance or any
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the other valid proof
b. For more than one proponent, points earned will be ✓ Accomplishment report w/
divided by the number of proponents. attachments: Pictures, WFP,
POW
position (15 points) Note: Any of the following
8.1 Technical Support during training or provided TA MOVs
to the schools in the orientation on the utilization
of LR Portal that includes resetting of passwords,
Letter with the name of the
etc. or in relation to LRs (5 points)
LD PDO
10 times and above - 5 points ✓ Travel Order with Certificate
8-9 times - 4 points of Appearance
6-7 times - 3 points
✓ TA Report
1-3 times - 1 point

8.2 Coordinated and provided technical and

administrative support to the Division and School
in the distribution of LAS/LSMs, Tablets, Inventory
of LAS/LSMs, Development, Quality Assurance of Note: Any of the following
LRs, and other Tools and Equipment (5 points) MOVs
10 times and above - 5 points ✓ Certification signed by SDS
8-9 times - 4 points on his/her task
6-7 times - 3 points ✓ Travel Order with Certificate
of Appearance
1-3 times - 1 point
✓ Memorandum
8.3 Conducted Learning and Development Activities ✓ TA Report
(such as Formal training: seminar, workshop,
orientation), Relationship and Discussion-Based
Learning (RDL: - coaching and mentoring, pair-
✓ ACR
assisted learning and community of practice, (Job
✓ Coaching Documentation
Embedded Learning), and LAC Sessions to the
Districts and Schools (5 points) ✓ Travel Order
✓ Any document that justifies
10 times and above - 5 points the conduct of the learning
8-9 times - 4 points and development activities
1-3 times - 1 point

(10 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
d. Validity of the learning and developmentactivities
• Alertness
• Judgment


IMPLEMENTING UNIT BOOKKEEPER/ACCOUNTANT
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________


CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 ✓ IPCRF for SY 2020-
rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) 2021 and 2021-2022
duly signed by
Point/s Earned authorities with date
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 20 of signing
✓ Service Record
✓ Special Order/Memorandum
issued as to coordinatorship or
advisership duly signed by
authorities
(65 points)

Barangay Level
Note:


nominees)
3.Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning ✓ Certificate of

Facilitator/Trainer (5 points) Recognition/Appreciation as
3.1Conducted in-depth basic/action research on Consultant/Resource
curriculum instruction innovations approved by RO Speaker/Learning
Facilitator/Trainer issued by
Research Team (5 points)
DepEd or other
• International/National - 5 points agencies/organizations
• Regional - 4 points sanctioned by DepEd
• School/Barangay - 1 point
Note:
4.Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to the ✓ Memorandum/Certificates/

position (50 points) Special Order
4.1 Membership in Organizations/Committees
(5 points)
• Membership in technical planning committee
4 or more Committees - 5 points

3 Committees - 3 points
2 Committees - 2 points
4.2 Budget Utilization Rate (OBLIGATION and ✓ Certified Status of BUR at RO-
FD
DISBURSEMENT) (5 points)
• BUR of 98-100% - 5 points

• BUR of 90-94 % - 3 points
• BUR of 84% and below - 1 point
✓ Status of Fund Utilization

4.3 Non-incurrence of Overdraft in current year certified by RO-Budget Officer
(5 points)
• No overdraft in allotment - 5 points

Incurred in the current year

4.4 Compliance with Reporting Requirements

4.4.1 Submission of Mid-Year and Year-End ✓ Certified Status by the SDO
Financial and Budgetary Reports (5 points) Accountant and Budget Officer

(within 24 hours from start of workshop)
(before the last day of workshop)
• Complete and accurate - 1 point
(within the submission date set/last day of
workshop)
4.4.2 Submission of Monthly and Quarterly

✓ Certified Status by the SDO
Financial and Budgetary Reports (5 points) Accountant and Budget Officer
submission date)
(1 day before the scheduled
4.4.3 MOOE/Cash Advances/Other Funds

✓ Certified Status by the SDO
Liquidation (5 points) Accountant and Budget Officer
• 100% Liquidation of School MOOE/ - 5 points
CA for the rating period
• 96-99% Liquidation of School MOOE/ - 4 points
• 85% and below Liquidation rate - 1 point
4.4.4 AOM Compliance (5 points)

✓ APPSI Validated by COA and
Status of AOM certified by RO-
• No AOM received within the year - 5 points
Accounting Section
• Compliance within the year - 4 points
of 50% and above
of 30-49%
of 10-29%
• Compliance within the year - 1 point
of 10% and below
4.4.5 NS Compliance (5 points) ✓ SASDC issued to the IU by COA

as of December 31, 2021 (with
• No NS balance by December 31 - 5 points NSSDC issued within the year)
• Compliance/settlement within the - 4 points
the year of 50% and above within the
year
the year of 30-49%

• -Compliance/settlement within the -2 points

the year of 10-29%
• Compliance/settlement within the -1 point
the year of 10% and below
4.4.6 ND Compliance (5 points) ✓ SASDC issued to the IU by COA

as of December 31, 2021 (with
• No ND balance by December 31 - 5 points
NSSDC issued within the year
the year of 50% and above within the
year
the year of 30-49%
• Compliance/settlement within the -2 points
the year of 10-29%
• Compliance/settlement within the -1 point
the year of 10% and below
4.4.7 Attendance to Division and Regional Call ✓ Certification of Attendance

Ups (5 points) duly signed by the SDO
Accountant and Budget Officer
• 100% Attendance to Division and RO - 5 points (for Division call-ups)
call-ups for CY 2021 ✓ Certification of Attendance
• 95-99% Attendance to Division and RO - 4 points
call-ups for CY 2021 duly signed by the CAO-FDr
• 90-94% Attendance to Division and RO - 3 points (for Regional call-ups)
call-ups for CY 2021
• 86-89% Attendance to Division and RO - 2 points
call-ups for CY 2021
• At least 85% Attendance to Division - 1 point
and RO call-ups for CY 2021

(10 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

(MONOGRADE SCHOOL – CENTRAL CATEGORY)
Name of School/District/Area: _____________________________________________________

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
VERIFICATION (MOVs) Earned
A. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP (34 points)
(Performance Indicator for the last two [2] years )
1. Drop-out Rate (4 points) ✓ Certification on the
Drop-out Rate, CSR,
Percentage of drop-out from the baseline Point/s and CR for the last
two (2) years coming
data from year to year in two (2) years Earned
from the SDO
0% 4 points Planning Officer or
0.01% - 1% 3 points data generated from
1.01% - 2% 2 points the LIS/EBEIS
3% and above 1 point
2. Cohort Survival Rate (3 points)

Baseline:75%
• High: At least 10% increase or at - 3 points
least 95% CSR
• Average: At least 7% increase - 2 points
• Marginal: at least 5% increase - 1 point
3. Completion Rate (3 points)
Baseline:75%
• High: at least 10% increase or at - 3 points
least 95% CR
• Average: at least 7% increase - 2 points
• Marginal: at least 5% increase - 1 point
4. School Academic Performance /Average Grades of ✓ Accomplished and
Learners (5 points) Signed SF 7
✓ Average Grades of
Point/s Earned Learners generated
= Average grades of learners for the last two (2) from the LIS
years (SY 2019-2020 and SY 2020-202) x 0.05
5. School Literacy Rate/Improved Reading Level ✓ Consolidated Phil-IRI
(5 points) Result (Pre and Post
Tests)
Percentage of learners who are at least Point/s
Instructional Readers Earned
90 -1000% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% -69.99% 2 points
59.99% and below 1 point

6. School Numeracy Rate (Improved Numeracy ✓ Consolidated

Level) (5 points) Numeracy
Assessment Result
(Pre and Post Tests)
Percentage of learners who are highly Point/s
numerates Earned
90 -1000% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% -69.99% 2 points
7. Percentage of Learners who Completely Complied ✓ Distribution and

the SLMs/LAS (5 Points) retrieval Log
Sheet/s
Percentage of learners who have Point/s ✓ Validated SMEA
completely complied the SLMs or LAS Earned Report
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% -89% 2 points
8. Instructional Supervision (IS) (4 points) ✓ Validated

Teachers were supervised, coached, and Instructional
mentored on the following K to 12 curriculum Supervisory
Implementation practices based on monthly Report/Monthly
supervisory plan: Accomplishment
a. DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation Report
f. ICT Integration
g. Adopting appropriate teaching methodologies
and learning delivery modes
Number of above-cited practices are Point/s

evident in the conduct of IS Earned
7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1 point

B. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT (20 points)

1. Child Protection Policy (CPP) and Anti-Bullying
Law Implementation (5 points) ✓ Copy of the Child
Protection
The school has implemented the CPP and Anti- Committee with their
Bullying Law with the following: TORs and ACRs
a. Institutionalized an effective child protection ✓ Copy of the School
policies and procedures, and monitors Child Protection
compliance thereof; Policy and Anti-
b. Organized a functional Child Protection Bullying Law
Committee (CPC); ✓ Approved
Training/LAC
c. Ensured that all pupils/learners, guardians or
Design/s and ACR
custodians, visitors and guests are made aware
✓ Copies of Advocacy
of the child protection policy;
Materials used
d. Conducted capacity building activities on child
✓ School Handbook
protection measures and protocols and anti-
✓ School Records of
bullying;
Cases/complaints
e. Adopted a student Code of Conduct to be under CPP and anti-
followed by every pupil or learner; and Bullying Law
f. 100% of cases/complaints were reported and
acted upon under the CPP and Anti-Bullying
Law
Number of above-cited Point/s

indicators that are present Earned
6 5 points
5 4 points
4 3 points
3 2 points
• 2 1 point
2. School-Based Feeding Program Implementation ✓ Learners’ Nutritional

(3 points) Status (Baseline and
End line Data)
Percentage of the learner- Point/s
beneficiaries achieved normal status Earned
90%-100% 3 points
80% - 89.99% 2 points

3. Disaster Risk Reduction Management (DRRM) ✓ Completed

Implementation and Institutionalization of RA CSSF,ACR of
9003: Clean and Green Program, Solid Waste the Solid
Management (3 points) Waste Mgt.,
Percentage of implementation of the and picture of
Comprehensive School Safety Framework MRF
(CSSF) and Solid Waste Management such Point/s
as segregation of waste materials and Earned
provision of Material Recovery Facility
(MRF) and Recycling Program
90%-100% 3 points
79% - 89% 2 points
68% - 78% 1 point
4. Health and Safety (4 points) ✓ Pictures/picto-

Percentage of implementation of COVID-19 narrative/ video of
Protocols such as setting of handwashing the activities
facilities, thermal scanner at the entrance, relativeto COVID-
Point/s 19 protocols with
putting up of triage, provision of PPEs such as
Earned ACR
facemask and face shield to employees, regular
disinfection of modules, tools and the like,
before distribution, during, and after retrieval
100% 4 points
95%-99% 3 points
90% - 94% 2 points
5. DCP Package Utilization (3 points) • Utilization report of

Heightened use of DCP Package and other available DCP Package by ICT
technologies integrated in the curriculum and (monthly or
implementation on the ICT ingenuities that further quarterly with
pictorials), Portfolio
improve service of the school with the following
of learners’ outputs
indicators: in ICT- related
a. Presence of document that showed 100% usage activities, and DCP
of equipment of knowledge embodied in the related activities are
DCP package. present in the
b. ICT integration in the curriculum produced SIP/AIP for at least 2
a highly conducive and beneficial learning consecutive years
experience to the learner.
c. The school implemented initiatives in
the maintenance of ICT.
Point/s
Number of indicators met
Earned
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point

6. Maintenance of School facilities and equipment ✓ Property Custodian’s

(2 points) Accomplishment
Percentage of learning facilities and Report
Point/s
equipment properly accounted and
Earned
maintained
90% - 100% 2 points
70% - 89% 1 point
C. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (10 points)
1. Provision of L & D (5 points)

✓ Memorandum
Number of hours ✓ LAC Plan/training
Number of designs approved by
LAC sessions are
INSETs the Approving
conducted in the Point/s Earned
Conducted in a Authority of the SDO
department/grade ✓ ACR, Impact
year
level per month evaluation, and other
8 hours 2 5 points M&E Tools
8 hours 1 4 points
2-3 hours 0 1 point
2. Attendance of staff to different capability-building ✓ SPPD/School Training

activities (5 Points) Needs as approved
by SH
• Point/s Earned = (No. of Staff who attended ✓ Training matrix
capability-building activities divided by total ✓ Memo
number of staff) x 5 ✓ Certificate of
Participation/
appearance
D. SCHOOL LEADERSHIP, MANAGEMENT, AND OPERATION (15 points)
1. Financial Management (5 Points) ✓ Certification coming
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and - 5 points from the Division
other funds submitted at least Accountant plus the
3 days before the deadline authenticated
liquidation report as
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and - 4 points
of September 30,
other funds submitted 2 days
2020
before the deadline
other funds submitted 1 day
before the deadline
other funds submitted on the
deadline

2. School Improvement Plan (SIP)/AIP (5 points)

a. Creation and Functionality of SPT ✓ SIP, AIP,WFP/APP
b. Alignment of AIP to SIP ✓ Attendance of
c. Information dissemination to stakeholders stakeholders, SPT,
d. Implementation of PAPs Program managers
✓ ACR
e. Quarterly review and adjustment conducted
✓ SRC
through SMEA
✓ SMEA
Number of the above-cited indicators Point/s
present Earned
5 5 points
4 4 points
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
3. Basic Education–Learning Continuity Plan ✓ BE-LCP

(BE-LCP) (5 Points) Accomplishment
Tracking Form
Percentage of Programs, Projects, and Point/s
Activities Implemented Earned
100% 5 points
95%-99% 4 points
90%-94% 3 points
85%-89% 2 points
E. PARENTS INVOLVEMENT AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP (8 points)

1. School-Community Partnership (5 points) -
✓ LSA contracts
Percentage of LSAs (Parents, LGU paid, and ✓ Schedule of
other Volunteers who are actively involved Point/s Assignments
in the Distance Learning Modality Earned ✓ Outputs/Results
implementation ✓ Accomplishment
Report
90%-100% 5 points
80%-89% 4 points
70%-79% 3 points
60%-69% 2 points
Below 60% 1 point

2. Resources generated through Brigada-Eskwela and

other resource-generated initiatives (3 points)
✓ Project Proposal
ELEMENTARY ✓ Deed of donations
Points
Central School ✓ Deed of acceptance
Php200,000.00 and above 3 pts. ✓ BE Report
Php76,000.00 to 199,999.00 2 pts.
Php75,000 to 75,999.00 1 pt.
F. OUTSTANDING/MERITORIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS (13 points)

1. SBM Level of Practice (5 points) ✓ SBM Assessment Tool
as evaluated and
approved by the
Validation Division/Regional
SBM Level Allotted Points SBM Task Force
Level
✓ Memorandum/
III RO 5 points Certificate of
III Division 3 points Accreditation or level
II Division 1 point duly signed by
SDS/RD
2. SBM-WInS (2.5 points)

• School’s WInS-OMS rating - 2.5 points ✓ SBM-WInS Checklist
of 3 Stars duly certified by the
• School’s WInS-OMS rating - 1.5 points SDO Coordinator
of 2 Stars and District Nurse
• School’s WInS-OMS rating - 0.5 points
of 1 Star
3. Rewards and Recognition received by the ✓ Plaque/Certificate of
school for the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) Recognition/
Appreciation/medals
• National/International - 2.5 points (First Placer or
• Region - 2 points Champion)
• Division - 1.5 points ✓ Program
• District - 1 point invitation/Memo
Note:
points earned shall be based on the award received
in the highest governance level. Otherwise, points
4. Implementation of the School Banner Project • Project
(3.0 points) Design/Manual
✓ Ingenuity of the Project - 0.5 point ✓ School
• This pertains to the nature and Improvement Plan/AIP
originality of the project and the ✓ Project
alignment of its objectives to its ImplementationPlan
target. The project should have • Resource
great impact to the current needs Generated for
of the school. School Banner

Project
implementation
✓ Advocacy Strategies - 0.5 point ✓ ACR (with highlights

• This pertains to the various of stakeholders’
strategies undertaken by the involvement
School to communicate the ✓ School Performance
banner project to the internal and Indicators
external stakeholders and the ✓ Customers’
School draws support from its Feedback
partners
✓ Impact to the School Performance – 1 point

✓ Project
• This depends on the target or ImplementationPlan
focus of the project. The project
should address the partners the
identified needs/weaknesses of
the School
✓ Accomplishment relative to School Banner – 1 point ✓ SMEA Results on

Project Implementation School Banner
• Accomplishment should be based Implementation
on the Annual Implementation Value Added
Plan of the School Banner Project. Accomplishments
Value added accomplishments
shallbe given additional points
based on merit set by the
evaluators.


(MONOGRADE SCHOOL NON– CENTRAL CATEGORY)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
A. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP (34 Points)
Drop-out Rate, CSR,
from the SDO

Baseline:75%
• High: At least 10% increase or at
least 95% CSR – 3 points
• Average: At least 7% increase – 2 points
• Marginal: at least 5% increase – 1 point
Baseline:75%
• High: at least 10% increase or at
least 95% CR – 3 points
• Average: at least 7% increase – 2 points
• Marginal: at least 5% increase – 1 point

= Average grades of learners for the last two (2) years from the LIS
(SY 2019-2020 and SY 2020-2021) x 0.05
Tests)
Percentage of learners who are at
Points Earned
least Instructional Readers
90% - 100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points


Assessment Result
Percentage of learners who are (Pre and Post Tests)
Points Earned
highly numerates
90% - 100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points

the SLMs/LAS (5 Points) retrieval Log Sheet/s
Percentage of learners who ✓ Validated SMEA
have completely complied the Points Earned Report
SLMs or LAS
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points
✓ Validated
8. Instructional Supervision (IS) (4 points)
Instructional
Teachers were supervised, coached, and mentored on Supervisory
the following K to 12 curriculum Implementation Report/Monthly
practices based on monthly supervisory plan: Accomplishment
a. DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation Report
f. ICT Integration
Number of the above cited

practices are evident in the Point/s Earned
conduct of IS
7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1 point


Protection
The school has implemented the CPP and Committee with their
Anti-Bullying Law with the following: TORs and ACRs
a. Institutionalized an effective child ✓ Copy of the School
protectionpolicies and procedures, and Child Protection
monitors compliance thereof; Policy and Anti-
Bullying Law
b. Organized a functional Child
✓ Approved Training LAC
ProtectionCommittee (CPC); Design/s and ACR
c. Ensured that all pupils/learners, guardians or ✓ Copies of Advocacy
custodians, visitors, and guests are made Materials used
aware of the child protection policy; ✓ School Handbook
d. Conducted capacity building activities on ✓ School Records of
childprotection measures and protocols and Cases/complaints
anti- bullying; under CPP and anti-
e. Adopted a student Code of Conduct to Bullying Law
be followed by every pupil or learner;
and
f. 100% of cases/complaints were reported
and acted upon under the CPP and Anti-
Bullying Law
Number of the above cited Point/s Earned

indicators that are present
6 5 points
5 4 points
4 3 points
3 2 points
2 1 point

End line Data)
Percentage of learners-beneficiaries Points Earned
achieved normal status
90% - 100% 3 points
80% - 89.99% 2 points

3. Disaster Risk Reduction Management (DRRM)

Implementation and Institutionalization of RA 9003: • Completed CSSF,
Clean and Green Program, Solid Waste Management ACR of the Solid
(3 points)
Waste Mgt., and
Percentage of implementation of the picture of MRF
Comprehensive School Safety
Framework (CSSF) and Solid Waste Point/s
Management such as segregation of Earned
waste materials and provision of
Material Recovery Facility (MRF) and
Recycling Program
90% - 100% 3 points
79% - 89% 2 points
68% - 78% 1 point

narrative/video of the
activities relative to
Percentage of implementation of
COVID-19 protocols
COVID-19 Protocols such as setting of with ACR
handwashing facilities, thermal Point/s
scanner at the entrance, putting up of Earned
triage, provision of PPEs such as
facemask and face shield to
employees, regular disinfection of
modules, tools and the like, before
distribution, during, and after retrieval
100% 4 points
95% - 99% 3 points
90% - 94% 2 points
5. DCP Package Utilization (3 points) Utilization report of

Heightened use of DCP Package and other available DCP Package by ICT
technologies integrated in the curriculum and (monthlyor quarterly
implementation on the ICT ingenuities that further with pictorials),
improve service of the school with the following Portfolio of learners’
indicators: outputs in ICT- related
activities, and DCP
a. Presence of document that showed 100% related activities are
usage of equipment of knowledge embodied in present in the SIP/AIP for
at least 2 consecutive
years

the DCP package.

b. ICT integration in the curriculum
produced a highly conducive and beneficial
learning experience to the learner.
c. The school implemented initiatives in
themaintenance of ICT.
Number of indicators met Point/s Earned
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
6. Maintenance of School facilities and equipment ✓ Property

(2points) Custodian’s
Accomplishment
Percentage of learning facilities Point/s Earned Report
and equipment properly
accounted and maintained
90% - 100% 2 points

70% - 89% 1 point

Number of hours Number of ✓ Memorandum

LAC Sessions are INSETs Point/s Earned ✓ LAC Plan/training
conducted in the Conducted designs approved
department / grade in a year by the Approving
level per month Authority of the
8 hours 2 5 points SDO
8 hours 1 4 points ✓ ACR, Impact
evaluation, and
otherM&E Tools
2-3 hours 0 1 point
2. Attendance of staff to different capability-

building activities (5 Points) ✓ SPPD/School Training
Needs as approved
• Point / s Earned = (No. of Staff who attended by SH
capability-building activities divided by total ✓ Training matrix
number of staff) x 5 ✓ Memo
✓ Certificate of
Participation/
appearance


1. Financial Management (5 Points) ✓ Certification
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and comingfrom the
other funds submitted at least Division Accountant
3 days before the deadline – 5 pts. plus the
authenticated
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and
of September 30,
2022
before the deadline – 4 pts.


deadline – 2 pts.
2. School Improvement Plan (SIP) /AIP (5 points) ✓ SIP, AIP,WFP/APP

a. Creation and Functionality of SPT ✓ Attendance of
b. Alignment of AIP to SIP stakeholders, SPT,
Program
c. Information dissemination to stakeholders
managers
d. Implementation of PAPs ✓ ACR
e. Quarterly review and adjustment ✓ SRC
conducted through SMEA ✓ SMEA
Number of the above-cited Point/s Earned

indicators present
5 5 points
4 4 points
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
3. Basic Education–Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP)

(5 Points) ✓ BE-LCP
✓ Accomplishment
Percentage of Programs, Projects, Tracking Form
and Activities Implemented Point/s Earned
100% 5 points
95%-99% 4 points
90%-94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points


1. School-Community Partnership. (5 points) ✓ LSA contracts -
✓ Schedule of
Percentage of LSAs (Parents, LGU Assignments
paid, and other Volunteers) who ✓ Outputs/Results
are actively involved in the ✓ Accomplishment
Point/s Earned Report
Distance Learning Modality
implementation
5 5 points
4 4 points
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
2. Resources generated through Brigada-Eskwela and -

ELEMENTARY
Points ✓ Project Proposal
Non-Central School ✓ Deed of donations
Php75,000.00 and above 3 pts. ✓ Deed of acceptance
Php50,000 to 74,999.00 2 pts. ✓ BE Report
Php25,000 to 49,999.00 1 pt.

1. SBM Level of Practice (5 points)
✓ SBM Assessment Tool
as evaluated and
SBM Validation approved by the
Allotted Points Division/Regional
Level Level
SBM Task Force
III RO 5 points ✓ Certificate of
III Division 3 points Accreditation or level
duly signed by the
II Division 1 point
SDS/RD

• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 3 Stars – 2.5 pts. ✓ SBM-WInS Checklist
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 2 Stars – 1.5 pts. duly certified by the
SDO Coordinator and
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 1 Star – 0.5 pts.
District Nurse

3. Rewards and Recognition received by the school for ✓ Plaque/Certificate of

the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) Recognition/
Appreciation/medals
• National/International – 2.5 pts. (First Placer or
• Region – 2.0 pts. Champion)
• Division – 1.5 pts. ✓ Program
• District – 1.0 pt. invitation/Memo
Note:
b. For same awards received in a calendar year, points
are cumulative.
4. Implementation of the School Banner Project (3.0

points) ✓ Project
✓ Ingenuity of the Project - 0.5 pt. Design/Manual
• This pertains to the nature and ✓ School
originality of the project and the Improvement
alignment of its objectives to its Plan/AIP
target. The project should have Project
great impact to the current Implementation Plan
needs of the School. ✓ Resource Generated
for School Banner
Project
implementation
✓ Advocacy Strategies – 0.5 pt. ✓ ACR (with

• This pertains to the various highlights of stake
strategies undertaken by the holders’
School to communicate the involvement
banner project to the internal ✓ School Performance
and external stakeholders and Indicators
the School draws support from ✓ Customers’
its partners. Feedback
✓ Impact to School Performance – 1.0 pt. ✓ Project

• This depends on the target or focus Implementation Plan
of the project. The project should
address the identified
needs/weaknesses of the School.
✓ Accomplishments relative to ✓ SMEA Results on

School Banner Project School Banner
Implementation – 1.0 pt. Implementation
• Accomplishments should be ✓ Value Added
based on the Annual Accomplishments
Implementation Plan of the

School Banner Project. Value

added accomplishments shall
be given additional points based
on merit set by the evaluators.


(MULTIGRADE SCHOOL)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
Drop-out Rate, CSR,
from the SDO

Baseline:75%
least 95% CSR – 3 pts.
• Average: At least 7% increase – 2 pts.
• Marginal: at least 5% increase – 1 pt.
Baseline:75%
least 95% CR – 3 pts.
• Average: at least 7% increase – 2 pts.

• Average grades of learners for the last three ✓ Average Grades of
(3)years (SY 2019-2020, SY 2020-2021 and SY Learners generated
2021-2022) x 0.05 from the LIS

Tests)
Percentage of learners who are least Point/s
Instructional Readers Earned
90% - 100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points
59.99% and above 1 point


Assessment Result
Percentage of learners who are highly Point/s (Pre and Post Tests)
numerates Earned
90% - 100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points

100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points

Teachers were supervised, coached, and mentored on Instructional
the following K to 12 curriculum Implementation Supervisory
practices based on monthly supervisory plan: Report/Monthly
a. DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation Accomplishment
Report
f. ICT Integration
Number of the above-cited practices are Point/s

7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1 point


The school has implemented the CPP and Anti- Protection
Bullying Law with the following: Committee with their
a. Institutionalized an effective child protection TORs and ACRs
policies and procedures, and monitors ✓ Copy of the School
compliance thereof; Child Protection
b. Organized a functional Child Protection Policy and Anti-
Committee (CPC); Bullying Law
✓ Approved Training
Design/s and ACR
custodians, visitors, and guests are made aware
Materials used
d. Conducted capacity building activities on child ✓ School Handbook
protection measures and protocols and anti- ✓ School Records of
bullying; Cases/complaints
acted upon under the CPP and Anti-Bullying Law

6 5 points
5 4 points
4 3 points
3 2 points
2 1 point

Percentage of the learner-beneficiaries Point/s End line Data)
achieved normal status Earned
90%-100% 3 points
80% - 89.99% 2 points
3. Disaster Risk Reduction Management (DRRM) ✓ Completed CSSF,

Implementation and Institutionalization of RA ACR of the Solid
9003: Clean and Green Program, Solid Waste Waste Mgt., and
Management(3 points) picture of MRF
Percentage of implementation of the Point/s
Comprehensive School Safety Framework Earned
(CSSF) and Solid Waste Management such
as segregation of waste materials and
90%-100% 3 points
80% - 89.99% 2 points
68% - 78% 1 point


Percentage of implementation of narrative/video of the
COVID-19 Protocols such as setting of activities relative to
COVID-19 protocols
with ACR
scanner at the entrance, putting up of Earned
triage, provision of PPEs such as
100% 4 points
95% - 99% 3 points
90% - 94% 2 points
5. DCP Package Utilization (3 points)

Heightened use of DCP Package and other available ✓ Utilization report of
technologies integrated in the curriculum and DCP Package by ICT
implementation on the ICT ingenuities that further (monthlyor quarterly
improve service of the school with the following with pictorials),
indicators: Portfolio of learners’
a. Presence of document that showed 100% outputs in ICT-
related activities, and
usage of equipment of knowledge embodied in
DCP related activities
the DCP package.
arepresent in the
b. ICT integration in the curriculum produced a SIP/AIP forat least 2
highly conducive and beneficial learning consecutive years
experience to the learner.
c. The school implemented initiatives in the
maintenance of ICT.
Point/s
Earned
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 points
6. Maintenance of School facilities and equipment (2 ✓ Property Custodian’s

points) Accomplishment
Percentage of learning facilities and Report
Point/s
equipment properly accounted and
Earned
maintained
90% - 100% 2 points
70% - 89% 1 point


conducted in the Conducted designs approved by
department / grade in a year the Approving
level per month Authority of the SDO
8 hours 1 4 points evaluation, and other
6-7 hours 1 3 points M&E Tools
2-3 hours 0 1 point
2. Attendance of staff to National, Regional, ✓ SPPD/School Training

Division, District Level Virtual or Face-to-Face Needs as approved
seminar, workshops, and trainings (5 Points) by SH
✓ Training matrix
• Point/s Earned = (No. of Staff who attended ✓ Memo
capability-building activities divided by total ✓ Certificate of
number of staff) x 5 Participation/
appearance
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and from the Division
other funds submitted at least 3 Accountant plus the
days before the deadline – 5 pts. authenticated
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and of September 30,
other funds submitted 2 days 2020


deadline – 2 pts.

2. School Improvement Plan/AIP (5 points) ✓ SIP, AIP, WFP/APP

stakeholders, SPT,
b. Alignment of AIP to SIP
Program managers
✓ ACR
d. Implementation of PAPs
✓ SRC
e. Quarterly review and adjustment conducted ✓ SMEA
through SMEA
Number of the above-cited indicators Point/s

present Earned
5 5 points
4 4 points
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
3. Basic Education–Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP) ✓ BE-LCP

(5 Points) Accomplishment
Tracking Form
Percentage of Programs, Projects, and Point/s

Activities Implemented Earned
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points
Percentage of LSAs (Parents, LGU ✓ Schedule of
paid, and other Volunteers) who are Point/s Assignments
actively involved in the Distance Earned ✓ Outputs/Results
Learning Modality implementation ✓ Accomplishment
90% -100% 5 points Report
80% - 89% 4 points
70% - 79% 3 points
60% - 69% 2 points
Below 60% 1 point

2. Resources generated through Brigada- Eskwela and -

ELEMENTARY ✓ Project Proposal

Points ✓ Deed of donations
Multi-Grade
Php30,000 to 49,999.00 2 pts. ✓ BE Report
Php20,000 to 29,999.00 1 pt.
F. OUTSTANDING/MERITORIOUS ACCOMPLISHMENTS - 13 POINTS

as evaluated and
Allotted Points
Level Level Division/Regional
III RO 5 points SBM Task Force
✓ Certificate of
III Division 3 points
Accreditation or level
II Division 1 point duly signed by the
SDS/RD

SDO Coordinator and
District Nurse
3. Rewards and Recognition received by the school ✓ Plaque/Certificate of

for the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) Recognition/
Appreciation/medals
Note:
are cumulative.

4. Implementation of the School Banner Project (3.0

points) ✓ Project
originality of the project and Improvement
thealignment of its objectives to Plan/AIP
its target. The project should ✓ Project
have great impact to the current Implementation
needsof the School. Plan
✓ Resource
Generated for
School Banner
Project
implementation

• This pertains to the various highlights of
strategies undertaken by the stakeholders’
School to communicate the involvement
banner project to the internal ✓ School Performance
and external stakeholders and Indicators
the School draws support ✓ Customers’
fromits partners. Feedback

• This depends on the target or Implementation
focus of the project. The project Plan
should address the identified
✓ Accomplishments relative to ✓ SMEA Results on

based on the Annual Accomplishments
School Banner Project. Value
be given additional points
basedon merit set by the
evaluators.

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL

NON-IMPLEMENTING UNIT

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(Performance Indicator for the last two (2) years)
Percentage of drop-out from the baseline Point/s Drop-out Rate, CSR,
data from year to year in two (2) years Earned and CR for the last
0% 5 points
from the SDO
0.01% - 1% 4 points Planning Officer or
3% and above 2 points the LIS/EBEIS

Baseline:75%
least 95% CSR –5 pts.
• Marginal: at least 5% increase – 3 pts.
Baseline:75%

• Point/s Earned ✓ Average Grades of
= Average grades of learners for the last two Learners generated
(2)years (SY 2019-2020 and SY 2020-2021) x 0.05 from the LIS
5. School Numeracy Rate/Improved Numeracy ✓ Consolidated

Level(5 points) Numeracy
Percentage of learners who are highly Point/s Assessment
numerates Earned Result (Pre and Post
Tests)
90% - 100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points
• 59.99% and below 1 point


✓ Validated SMEA
Percentage of learners who have Point/s Report
completely complied the SLMs or LAS Earned
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points

Report
f. ICT Integration

7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1points


A. Institutionalized an effective child protection TORs and ACRs
B. Organized a functional Child Protection Policy and Anti-
C. Ensured that all pupils/learners, guardians or ✓ Approved Training
custodians, visitors, and guests are made aware Design/s and ACR
of the child protection policy; ✓ Copies of Advocacy
D. Conducted capacity building activities on child Materials used
protection measures and protocols and anti- ✓ School Handbook
bullying; ✓ School Records of
E. Adopted a student Code of Conduct to be Cases/complaints
followed by every pupil or learner; and under CPP and anti-
F. 100% of cases/complaints were reported and Bullying Law

6
5 4 points
4 3 points
3 2 points
2 1point

Implementation and Institutionalization of RA 9003: ACR of the Solid
Clean and Green Program, Solid Waste Management Waste Mgt., and
(4 points) picture of MRF

90% - 100% 4 points
79% - 89% 3 points
68% - 78% 2 points

3. Health and Safety (4 points) ✓ Pictures/picto

Percentage of implementation of narrative/video
COVID-19 Protocols such as setting of of the activities
relative to
COVID-19
scanner at the entrance, putting up of Earned protocols with
triage, provision of PPEs such as ACR
100% 4 points
95% - 99% 3 points
90% - 94% 2 points
4. DCP Package Utilization (3 points) ✓ Utilization report of
Heightened use of DCP Package and other DCP Package by ICT
available technologies integrated in the (monthly or quarterly
curriculum and implementation on the ICT with pictorials),
ingenuities that further improve service of the Portfolio of learners’
school with the followingindicators: outputs in ICT related
a. Presence of document that showed 100% activities, and DCP
usage of equipment of knowledge related are present in
embodied in the DCPpackage. the SIP/AIP for at
b. ICT integration in the curriculum has least 2 consecutive
produced a highly conducive and beneficial years
maintenance of ICT.
Point/s
Earned
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
5. Maintenance of Learning Facilities and ✓ Property Custodian’s

Accomplishment
Equipment (4 points)
Report
Percentage of learning
facilities and equipment Point/s
properly accounted and Earned
maintained
90% -100% 4 points
70% - 89% 2 points


department / grade in a year bythe Approving
6-7 hours 1 3 points evaluation, and
4-5 hours 1 2 points otherM&E Tools
2-3 hours 0 1 point
2. Attendance of staff to different capability ✓ SPPD/School

building activities (5 Points) Training Needs as
approved by SH
• Point/s Earned = No. of Staff who attended ✓ Training matrix
✓ Certificate of
number of staff) x 5
Participation/
✓ Appearance

• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds comingfrom the
submitted at least 3 days before Division Accountant
the deadline – 5 pts. plus the
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds authenticated
submitted 2 days before the deadline – 4 pts. liquidation report as
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds of September 30,
submitted 1 day before the deadline – 3 pts. 2022
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds
Submitted on the deadline - 2 pts.
2. School Improvement Plan/AIP (5 points) ✓ SIP, AIP,WFP/APP

✓ Attendance of
a. a. Creation and Functionality of SPT
stakeholders, SPT,
b. Alignment of AIP to SIP Program managers
c. Information dissemination to stakeholders ✓ ACR
d. Implementation of PAPs ✓ SRC
through SMEA
Number of the above-cited Point/s

indicators present Earned
5 5 points
4 4 points

3 3 points
2 2 points
2 1 point
3. Basic Education –Learning Continuity Plan

(BE-LCP) (5 Points) ✓ BE-LCP
Accomplishment
Percentage of Programs, Projects, Point/s Tracking Form
and Activities Implemented Earned
100% 5 points
95%-99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points

1. School-Community Partnership. (5 points) -
Percentage of LSAs (Parents, ✓ LSA contracts

LGU paid, and other Volunteers ✓ Schedule of
Point/s
who are actively involved in the Assignments
Earned ✓ Outputs/Results
100% 5 points Report
95%-99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points
2. Resources generated through Brigada- Eskwela -

andother resource-generated initiatives (3 points)
JHS/SHS/IS Points
✓ Deed of donations
Php300,000.00 to 399,999.00 2 pts. ✓ BE Report
Php200,000.00 to 299,999.00 1 pt.


as evaluated and
Allotted Points
✓ Certificate of
SDS/RD

✓ SBM-WInS Checklist
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 2 Stars – 1.5 pts. SDO Coordinator and
District Nurse
3. Rewards and Recognition received by the ✓ Plaque/Certificate of

school for the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) Recognition/
Appreciation/medals
✓ Program
• Division – 1.5 pts.
invitation/Memo
• District – 1.0 pt.
Note:
4. Implementation of the School Banner Project

(3.0 points) ✓ Project
✓ Ingenuity of the Project - 0.5 Design/Manual
pt. ✓ School
alignment of its objectives to its Implementation Plan
target. The project should have ✓ Resource
of the School. School Banner
Project
implementation

strategies undertaken by holders’ involvement

the School to ✓ School Performance

communicate the banner Indicators
project to the internal and ✓ Customers’
external stakeholders and Feedback
the School draws support
from its partners.

focus of the project. The Plan
project should address the
identified needs/weaknesses
of the School.
✓ Accomplishments relative ✓ SMEA Results on

toSchool Banner Project School Banner
basedon the Annual Accomplishments
School Banner Project.Value
based on merit set by the evaluators.

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING (JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL)

(IMPLEMENTING UNIT)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
Drop-out Rate, CSR,
and CR for the last
Percentage of drop-out from the baseline Point/s
from the SDO
data from year to year in two (2) years Earned Planning Officer or
0% 4 points data generated from
1.01% - 2% 2 points

Baseline:75%
3. Rate (4 points)
Baseline:75%

(2) years (SY 2020-2021 and SY 2021-2022) x 0.04 from the LIS


Level (4 points) Numeracy
Percentage of learners who are Point/s Earned Assessment Result
highly numerates (Pre and Post Tests)
90% - 100% 4 points
80% - 89.99% 3 points
70% - 79.99% 2 points

✓ Validated SMEA
Report
Percentage of learners who have
completely complied the Point/s Earned
SLMs or LAS
100% 4 points
95% - 99% 3 points
90% - 94% 2 points
✓ Validated
7. Instructional Supervision (IS) (4 points) Instructional
Teachers were supervised, coached, and mentored on Supervisory
the following K to 12 curriculum Implementation Report/Monthly
practices based on monthly supervisory plan: Accomplishment
• DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation Report
• Designing assessment tools/items
• Analyzing assessment results
• Regular updating of school forms
• Classroom Observation using PPST-COT
• ICT Integration
• Adopting appropriate teaching methodologies and
Number of the above-cited

practices are evident in the conduct Point/s Earned
of IS
7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1 point


Protection
The school has implemented the CPP and Anti- Committee with their
Bullying Law with the following: TORs and ACRs
a. Institutionalized an effective child protection ✓ Copy of the School
policies and procedures, and monitors Child Protection
compliance thereof; Policy and Anti-
b. Organized a functional Child Protection Bullying Law
Committee (CPC); ✓ Approved Training
Design/s and ACR
Materials used
✓ School Handbook
d. Conducted capacity building activities on child ✓ School Records of
protection measures and protocols and anti- Cases/complaints
bullying; under CPP and anti-
e. Adopted a student Code of Conduct to be Bullying Law
followed by every pupil or learner; and

Point/s Earned
5 3 points
4 2 points
3 1 point

the Comprehensive School Safety
Framework (CSSF) and Solid Waste
Management such as segregation Point/s Earned
of waste materials and provision of
Material Recovery Facility (MRF)
and Recycling Program
90% -100% 3 points
79% - 89% 2 points
68% - 78% 1 point


Percentage of implementation of COVID- narrative/video
19 Protocols such as setting of of the activities
relative to
handwashing facilities, thermal scanner at
COVID-19
the entrance, putting up of triage, protocols with
Point/s
provision of PPEs such as facemask and ACR
Earned
face shield to employees, regular
disinfection of school facilities, disinfection
of modules, tools and the like, before
100% 3 points
95% - 99% 2 points

Heightened use of DCP Package and other available ✓ Utilization report
technologies integrated in the curriculum and of DCP Package
implementation on the ICT ingenuities that further by ICT (monthly
improve service of the school with the following or quarterly with
indicators: pictorials),
a. Presence of document that shows 100% usage of Portfolio of
equipment of knowledge embodiedin the DCP learners’ outputs
package. in ICT- related
activities, and
b. ICT integration in the curriculum has produced a
DCP related
highly conducive and beneficial learning experience activities are
to the learner. present in the
c. The school implemented initiatives in the SIP/AIP for at
maintenance of ICT. least 2
consecutive
Number of indicators met Point/s Earned years
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
5. Maintenance of Learning Facilities and Equipment

(3 points) ✓ Property
Custodian’s
Percentage of learning Accomplishment
facilities and equipment Report
Point/s Earned
properly accounted and
maintained
95% - 100% 3 points
86% - 94% 2 points
75% - 85% 1 point


Number of INSETs
sessions are conducted Point/s ✓ LAC Plan/training
conducted in a
in the department/grade Earned designs approved by
year the Approving
level per month
✓ ACR, Impact
8 hours 1 4 points
evaluation, and other
2-3 hours 0 1 point

by SH
• Point/s Earned ✓ Training matrix
= (No. of Staff who attended capability-building ✓ Memo Certificate of
activities divided by total number of staff) x 5 Participation/
appearance
1. Financial Management (18 Points) ✓ Certified Status of
a. Budget Utilization Rate (Obligation and BUR at RO-FD
Disbursement Rate (2 points
• BUR of 99 -100% - 2 pts.
• BUR of 95 -97% - 1.5 pts.
• BUR of 90 -94% - 1 pt.
• BUR of 85 -89% and below - 0.5 pt.
b. Non-incurrence of Overdraft (2 points) ✓ Status of Fund

Utilization certified
• No overdraft in allotment - 2 pts. by RO-FD
incurred for the year
c. Compliance with Reporting Requirements ✓ Certified Status

(12 points) Report by the SDO-
Accountant and
c.1 Submission of Mid-Year and Year-End Financial Budget Officer
Reports (2 points)
(within 24 hours from start
of workshop)
(before the last day of
the workshop)
• Complete (within the submission - 0.5 point
(date/set last day of the workshop)

c.2 Submission of Monthly and Quarterly Financial ✓ Certified Status

Reports (2 points) Report by the SDO-
• Complete and accurate (3 days - 2 points Accountant and
Budget Officer
before the scheduled submission date)
of workshop)
• Complete and accurate (2 days - 1 point
before the scheduled submission
date set)
• Complete and accurate (1 day - 0.5 point
date set)
c.3 MOOE/Cash Advances/Other Funds Liquidation ✓ Certified Status

(2 points) Report by the SDO-
Accountant and
Percentage of Liquidation of Budget Officer
School MOOE/CA for the Point/s Earned
rating period
100% 2 points
96%-99% 1.5 points
91% - 95% 1 point
90% and below 0.5 point
c.4 AOM Compliance (2 points) ✓ APPSI Validated by

• No AOM received within the year - 2 points COA and Status of
AOM certified by
• Compliance within the year of 50% - 1.5 points
RO Accounting
and above Section
• Compliance within the year of - 1 point
30-49%
• Compliance within the year of - 0.5 point
29% and below
c.5 NS Compliance (2 points)

✓ SASDC issued to IU
• No NS balance by December 31 - 2 points by COA as of
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1.5 points December 31, 2021
year of 50% and above (with NSSDC issued
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1 point within the year)
year of 30-49%
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 0.5 point
Year of 29% and below
c.6 ND Compliance (2 points) ✓ SASDC issued to IU

• No ND balance by December 31 - 2 points by COA as of
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1.5 points December 31, 2021
year of 50% and above (with NSSDC issued
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1 point within the year)
year of 30-49%

d. Attendance of Bookkeeper to Division and ✓ Certification of

Regional Call-ups (2 Points) Attendance duly
signed by the CAO-
FD (for Regional
Percentage of Attendance call-ups)
to Division and RO call-ups Point/s Earned
for CY 2021
100% 2 points
95% - 99% 1.5 points
90% - 94% 1 point
2. School Improvement Plan/AIP (4 points)

a. Creation and Functionality of SPT ✓ SIP, AIP, WFP/APP
✓ Attendance of
c. Information dissemination to stakeholders Program managers
e. Quarterly review and adjustment conducted ✓ SRC
through SMEA ✓ SMEA

5 4 points
4 3 points
1-3 2 points
3. Basic Education-Learning Continuity Plan ✓ BE-LCP

(BE-LCP) (4 points) AccomplishmentTracking
Form
Percentage of Programs,
Point/s
Projects, and Activities
Earned
Implemented
100% 4 points
90-99% 3 points
89% and below 2 points


✓ Schedule of
paid, and other Volunteers who are Point/s ✓ Outputs/Results
actively involved in the Distance Earned ✓ Accomplishment
Report
Learning Modality implementation
90% -100% 5 points
80% - 89% 4 points
70% - 79% 3 points
60% - 69% 2 points
Below 60% 1 point

JHS/SHS/IS Points
Php200,000.00 to 299,999.00 1 pt.

as evaluated and
Allotted Points
Level Level Division/Regional SBM
III RO 5 points Task Force
III Division 3 points ✓ Certificate of
II . Division 1 point Accreditation or level of
duly signed by SDS/RD
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 1 Star – 0.5 pts. SDO Coordinator and
District Nurse
3. Rewards and Recognition received by the school

for the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) ✓ Plaque/Certificate of
Recognition/
• National/International – 2.5 pts. Appreciation/medals
• Region – 2.0 pts. (First Placer or
• Division – 1.5 pts. Champion)
• District – 1.0 pt. ✓ Program
invitation/Memo
Note:


highest governance level. Otherwise, points earnedare
cumulative.
4. Implementation of the School Banner Project

✓ Resource
Generated for
School Banner
Project
implementation
✓ Advocacy Strategies – 0.5 pt.

• This pertains to the various
✓ ACR (with
strategies undertaken by the highlights of
School to communicate the stakeholders’
banner project to the internal involvement
and external stakeholders and ✓ School Performance
the School draws support Indicators
fromits partners. ✓ Customers’
Feedback
✓ Impact to School Performance – 1.0 pt.

• This depends on the target or ✓ Project
focus of the project. The project Implementation
should address the identified Plan

✓ Accomplishments relative to
✓ SMEA Results on
School Banner Project
School Banner
• Accomplishments should be based ✓ Value Added
on the Annual Implementation Accomplishments
Plan of the School Banner Project.
shall be given additional points

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SECONDARY SCHOOL (JHS & SHS)

NON-IMPLEMENTING UNIT

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(Performance Indicator for the last two (2) years )
0% 5 points
from the SDO

Baseline:75%
• High: At least 10% increase or at –5 pts.
least 95% CSR
Baseline:75%
a. High: at least 10% increase or at
b. Average: at least 7% increase – 4 pts.
c. Marginal: at least 5% increase – 3 pts.
4. School Academic Performance /Average Grades ✓ Accomplished and

ofLearners (5 points) Signed SF 7
(2)years (SY 2019-2020 and SY 2020-2021) x 0.05 from the LIS

Percentage of learners who are highly Point/s Assessment
numerates Earned Result (Pre and Post
Tests)
90% - 100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points


✓ Validated SMEA
Percentage of learners who have Point/s Report
completely complied the SLMs or LAS Earned
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points

Report
f. ICT Integration

7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1points


b. Organized a functional Child Policy and Anti-
ProtectionCommittee (CPC); Bullying Law
c. Ensured that all pupils/learners, guardians ✓ Approved Training
or custodians, visitors, and guests are made Design/s and ACR
awareof the child protection policy; ✓ Copies of Advocacy
d. Conducted capacity building activities on Materials used
childprotection measures and protocols ✓ School Handbook
and anti- bullying; ✓ School Records of
e. Adopted a student Code of Conduct to Cases/complaints
befollowed by every pupil or learner; under CPP and anti-
and Bullying Law
Law

6 5 points
5 4 points
4 3 points
3 2 points
2 1 point


90% - 100% 4 points
79% - 89% 3 points
68% - 78% 2 points


Percentage of implementation of narrative/video
COVID-19 Protocols such as setting of of the activities
relative to
COVID-19
scanner at the entrance, putting up of Earned protocols with
triage, provision of PPEs such as ACR
100% 4 points
95% - 99% 3 points
90% - 94% 2 points
4. DCP Package Utilization (3 points) ✓ Utilization report of
Heightened use of DCP Package and other DCP Package by ICT
available technologies integrated in the (monthly or quarterly
curriculum and implementation on the ICT with pictorials),
ingenuities that further improve service of the Portfolio of learners’
school with the followingindicators: outputs in ICT related
a. Presence of document that showed 100% activities, and DCP
usage of equipment of knowledge related are present in
embodied in the DCPpackage. the SIP/AIP for at
b. ICT integration in the curriculum has least 2 consecutive
produced a highly conducive and beneficial years
maintenance of ICT.
Point/s
Earned
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
5. Maintenance of Learning Facilities and ✓ Property Custodian’s

Accomplishment
Equipment (2 points)
Report
facilities and equipment Point/s
properly accounted and Earned
maintained
90% -100% 4 points
70% - 89% 2 points


department / grade in a year bythe Approving
6-7 hours 1 3 points evaluation, and
4-5 hours 1 2 points otherM&E Tools
2-3 hours 0 1 point
2. Attendance of staff to different capability ✓ SPPD/School

building activities (5 Points) Training Needs as
approved by SH
✓ Certificate of
number of staff) x 5
Participation/
✓ Appearance

• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds comingfrom the
submitted at least 3 days before Division Accountant
the deadline – 5 pts. plus the
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds authenticated
submitted 2 days before the deadline – 4 pts. liquidation report as
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds of September 30,
submitted 1 day before the deadline – 3 pts. 2022
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and other funds
Submitted on the deadline - 2 pts.
2. School Improvement Plan/AIP (5 points) ✓ SIP, AIP,WFP/APP

✓ Attendance of
stakeholders, SPT,
a. Creation and Functionality of SPT Program managers
b. Alignment of AIP to SIP ✓ ACR
✓ SRC
d. Implementation of PAPs ✓ SMEA
e. Quarterly review and adjustment conducted
through SMEA

5 5 points

4 4 points
3 3 points
2 2 points
2 1 point
3.Basic Education –Learning Continuity Plan

(BE-LCP) (5 Points) ✓ BE-LCP
Accomplishment
Percentage of Programs, Projects, Point/s Tracking Form
and Activities Implemented Earned
100% 5 points
95%-99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points

1.School-Community Partnership. (5 points) -
Percentage of LSAs (Parents, ✓ LSA contracts

LGU paid, and other Volunteers ✓ Schedule of
Point/s
who are actively involved in the Assignments
Earned ✓ Outputs/Results
100% 5 points Report
95%-99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points
2. Resources generated through Brigada- Eskwela -

and other resource-generated initiatives (3 points)
JHS/SHS/IS Points
Php200,000.00 to 299,999.00 1 pt.


as evaluated and
Allotted Points
✓ Certificate of
SDS/RD
2.SBM-WInS (2.5 points)

✓ SBM-WInS Checklist
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 2 Stars – 1.5 pts. SDO Coordinator and
District Nurse
3.Rewards and Recognition received by the ✓ Plaque/Certificate of

school for the current Calendar Year (2.5 Recognition/
points) Appreciation/medals
(First Placer or
• National/International – 2.5 pts. Champion)
• Region – 2.0 pts. ✓ Program
• Division – 1.5 pts. invitation/Memo
Note:
c. Points earned are cumulative but not to
d. For same awards received in a calendar year,
4.Implementation of the School Banner Project

✓ Ingenuity of the Project - 0.5 Design/Manual
pt. ✓ School
alignment of its objectives to its Implementation Plan
target. The project should have ✓ Resource
of the School. School Banner
Project
implementation

strategies undertaken by holders’ involvement

the School to ✓ School Performance

communicate the banner Indicators
project to the internal and ✓ Customers’
external stakeholders and Feedback
the School draws support
from its partners.

focus of the project. The Plan
project should address the
identified needs/weaknesses
of the School.
✓ Accomplishments relative ✓ SMEA Results on

toSchool Banner Project School Banner
basedon the Annual Accomplishments
School Banner Project.Value

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING (SECONDARY SCHOOL (JHS & SHS)

(IMPLEMENTING UNIT)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(Performance Indicator for the last two (2) years )
1.Drop-out Rate (4 points) ✓ Certification on the
Drop-out Rate, CSR,
three (3) years
coming from the SDO
2.Cohort Survival Rate (4 points)

Baseline:75%
• least 95% CSR – 4 pts.
3.Completion Rate (4 points)

Baseline:75%
✓ Accomplished and
4.School Academic Performance /Average Grades of Signed SF 7
Learners (4 points) ✓ Average Grades of
• Point/s Earned Learners generated
= Average grades of learners for the last two from the LIS
(2) years (SY 2020-2021 and SY 2021-2022) x 0.04

✓ Consolidated
5.School Numeracy Rate/Improved Numeracy Numeracy
Level (4 points) Assessment Result
(Pre and Post Tests)
Percentage of learners who are Point/s Earned
highly numerates
90% - 100% 4 points
80% - 89.99% 3 points
70% - 79.99% 2 points
✓ Distribution and
6.Percentage of Learners who Completely Complied retrieval Log Sheet/s
the SLMs/LAS (4 Points) ✓ Validated SMEA
Report
Percentage of learners who have
completely complied the SLMs or Point/s Earned
LAS
100% 4 points
95% - 99% 3 points
90% - 94% 2 points
✓ Validated
7.Instructional Supervision (IS) (4 points) Instructional
Supervisory
Teachers were supervised, coached, and mentored on Report/Monthly
the following K to 12 curriculum Implementation Accomplishment
practices based on monthly supervisory plan: Report
• DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation
• ICT Integration
• Adopting appropriate teaching methodologies and

practices are evident in the conduct Point/s Earned
of IS
7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1 point


Law Implementation (3 points)
The school has implemented the CPP and Anti- ✓ Copy of the Child
Bullying Law with the following: Protection
a. Institutionalized an effective child protection Committee with their
policies and procedures, and monitors TORs and ACRs
compliance thereof; ✓ Copy of the School
b. Organized a functional Child Protection Child Protection
Committee (CPC); Policy and Anti-
c. Ensured that all pupils/learners, guardians or Bullying Law
custodians, visitors, and guests are made aware ✓ Approved Training
of the child protection policy; Design/s and ACR
d. Conducted capacity building activities on child
Materials used
✓ School Handbook
bullying;
e. Adopted a student Code of Conduct to be Cases/complaints
followed by every pupil or learner; and under CPP and anti-
100% of cases/complaints were reported and Bullying Law

Point/s Earned
5 3 points
4 2 points
3 1 point

Implementation and Institutionalization of RA ACR of the Solid
9003: Clean and Green Program, Solid Waste Waste Mgt., and
Management(3 points) picture of MRF
the Comprehensive School Safety
Management such as segregation Point/s Earned
of waste materials and provision of
Material Recovery Facility (MRF)
and Recycling Program
90% -100% 3 points
79% - 89% 2 points
68% - 78% 1 point


Percentage of implementation of COVID- narrative/video
19 Protocols such as setting of of the activities
relative to
handwashing facilities, thermal scanner at
COVID-19
the entrance, putting up of triage, protocols with
Point/s
provision of PPEs such as facemask and ACR
Earned
face shield to employees, regular
100% 3 points
95% - 99% 2 points

Heightened use of DCP Package and other available ✓ Utilization report
technologies integrated in the curriculum and of DCP Package
implementation on the ICT ingenuities that further by ICT (monthly
improve service of the school with the following or quarterly with
indicators: pictorials),
a. Presence of document that shows 100% usage of Portfolio of
equipment of knowledge embodiedin the DCP learners’ outputs
package. in ICT- related
b. ICT integration in the curriculum has produced a activities, and
highly conducive and beneficial learning experience DCP related
to the learner. activities are
c. The school implemented initiatives in the present in the
SIP/AIP for at
maintenance of ICT.
least 2
consecutive
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
5. Maintenance of Learning Facilities and Equipment

(3 points)
✓ Property
Custodian’s
Percentage of learning Accomplishment
facilities and equipment Report
Point/s Earned
maintained
95% - 100% 3 points
86% - 94% 2 points
75% - 85% 1 point


1.Provision of L & D (5 points)

Number of INSETs
sessions are conducted Point/s ✓ LAC Plan/training
conducted in a designs approved by
in the department/grade Earned
year the Approving
level per month
Authority of the SDO
8 hours 2 5 points
✓ ACR, Impact
2-3 hours 0 1 point

by SH
• Point/s Earned ✓ Training matrix
= (No. of Staff who attended capability-building ✓ Memo Certificate of
activities divided by total number of staff) x 5 Participation/
appearance
1.Financial Management (18 Points) ✓ Certified Status of
1.1 Budget Utilization Rate (Obligation and BUR at RO-FD
Disbursement Rate (2 points
• BUR of 99 -100% - 2 pts.
• BUR of 95 -97% - 1.5 pts.
• BUR of 90 -94% - 1 pt.
• BUR of 85 -89% and below - 0.5 pt.
1.2 Non-incurrence of Overdraft (2 points) ✓ Status of Fund

Utilization certified
• No overdraft in allotment - 2 pts. by RO-FD
incurred for the year
1.3 Compliance with Reporting Requirements

(12 points)
1.3.1 Submission of Mid-Year and Year-End Financial ✓ Certified Status

Report by the SDO-
Reports (2 points) Accountant and
• Complete and accurate - 2 points Budget Officer
(within 24 hours from start
of workshop)
(before the last day of
the workshop)
• Complete (within the submission - 0.5 point
(date/set last day of the workshop)

1.3.2 Submission of Monthly and Quarterly Financial

Reports (2 points)
• Complete and accurate (3 days - 2 points
✓ Certified Status
before the scheduled submission date)
Report by the SDO-
of workshop) Accountant and
• Complete and accurate (2 days - 1 point Budget Officer
date set)
• Complete and accurate (1 day - 0.5 point
date set)
1.3.3 MOOE/Cash Advances/Other Funds Liquidation

(2 points)
Percentage of Liquidation of ✓ Certified Status

School MOOE/CA for the Point/s Earned Report by the SDO-
rating period Accountant and
100% 2 points Budget Officer
96%-99% 1.5 points
91% - 95% 1 point
1.3.4 AOM Compliance (2 points)

• No AOM received within the year - 2 points
• Compliance within the year of 50% - 1.5 points
✓ APPSI Validated by
and above COA and Status of
• Compliance within the year of - 1 point AOM certified by
30-49% RO Accounting
• Compliance within the year of - 0.5 point Section
29% and below
1.3.5 NS Compliance (2 points)

• No NS balance by December 31 - 2 points
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1.5 points
year of 50% and above ✓ SASDC issued to IU
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1 point by COA as of
year of 30-49% December 31, 2021
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 0.5 point (with NSSDC issued
within the year)
1.3.6 ND Compliance (2 points)

• No ND balance by December 31 - 2 points
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1.5 points
year of 50% and above ✓ SASDC issued to IU
• Compliance/Settlement within the - 1 point by COA as of
year of 30-49%
December 31, 2021
(with NSSDC issued
within the year)

1.4 Attendance of Bookkeeper to Division and

Regional Call-ups (5 Points)
✓ Certification of
Percentage of Attendance Attendance duly
to Division and RO call-ups Point/s Earned signed by the CAO-
for CY 2021 FD (for Regional
call-ups)
100% 2 points
95% - 99% 1.5 points
90% - 94% 1 point
2. School Improvement Plan/AIP (4 points)

f. Creation and Functionality of SPT
g. Alignment of AIP to SIP
h. Information dissemination to stakeholders ✓ SIP, AIP, WFP/APP
i. Implementation of PAPs ✓ Attendance of
j. Quarterly review and adjustment conducted stakeholders, SPT,
through SMEA Program managers
✓ ACR
✓ SRC
✓ SMEA
5 4 points
4 3 points
1-3 2 points
3. Basic Education-Learning Continuity Plan

(BE-LCP) (4 points)
Percentage of Programs, ✓ BE-LCP

Point/s AccomplishmentTracking
Projects, and Activities
Earned Form
Implemented
100% 4 points
90-99% 3 points


1.School-Community Partnership. (5 points) ✓ LSA contracts -
✓ Schedule of
paid, and other Volunteers who are Point/s ✓ Outputs/Results
actively involved in the Distance Earned ✓ Accomplishment
Report
Learning Modality implementation
90% -100% 5 points
80% - 89% 4 points
70% - 79% 3 points
60% - 69% 2 points
Below 60% 1 point

JHS/SHS/IS Points
Php200,000.00 to 299,999.00 1 pt.

as evaluated and
Allotted Points
Level Level Division/Regional SBM
II . Division 1 point Accreditation or level of
duly signed by SDS/RD
2.SBM-WInS (2.5 points)
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 1 Star – 0.5 pts. SDO Coordinator and
District Nurse
3.Rewards and Recognition received by the schoolfor

the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) ✓ Plaque/Certificate of
Recognition/
• National/International – 2.5 pts. Appreciation/medals
• Region – 2.0 pts. (First Placer or
• Division – 1.5 pts. Champion)
• District – 1.0 pt. ✓ Program
invitation/Memo

4.Implementation of the School Banner Project

✓ Resource
Generated for
School Banner
Project
implementation

• This pertains to the various ✓ ACR (with
strategies undertaken by the highlights of
School to communicate the stakeholders’
banner project to the internal involvement
and external stakeholders and ✓ School Performance
the School draws support Indicators
fromits partners. ✓ Customers’
Feedback

focus of the project. The project Implementation
should address the identified Plan
✓ Accomplishments relative to
✓ SMEA Results on
School Banner Project
School Banner
• Accomplishments should be based ✓ Value Added
on the Annual Implementation Accomplishments


(STAND-ALONE SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
Drop-out Rate, CSR,
from the SDO
3% and above 2 points

Baseline:75%

Baseline:75%
= Average grades of learners for the last two (2) from the LIS
years (SY 2019-2020 and SY 2020-2021) x 0.05
5. School Literacy Rate/Improved Reading Level ✓ Consolidated
(5 points) Numeracy
Assessment Result
Percentage of learners who are highly Point/s (Pre and Post Tests)
numerates Earned
90% - 100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points

6. Percentage of Learners who Completely ✓ Distribution and

Complied the SLMs/LAS (5 Points) retrieval Log
Sheet/s
Percentage of Learners who have Point/s ✓ Validated SMEA
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points

Teachers were supervised, coached, and Instructional
mentored on the following K to 12 curriculum Supervisory
Implementation practices based on monthly Report/Monthly
supervisory plan: Accomplishment
• DLL/DLP, SLM and LAS preparation Report
• ICT Integration
• Adopting appropriate teaching methodologies
andlearning delivery modes
Number of the above-cited practices Point/s

are evident in the conduct of IS Earned
7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1 point


c. Ensured that all pupils/learners, guardians or Design/s and ACR
custodians, visitors, and guests are made aware ✓ Copies of Advocacy
of the child protection policy; Materials used
bullying;
Cases/complaints
that are present Earned
6 5 points
5 4 points
4 3 points
3 2 points
2 1 point

Implementation and Institutionalization on RA 9003: ACR of the Solid
Percentage of implementation of the Point/s Earned
Management such as segregation of
Material Recovery Facility (NRF) and
Recycling Program
90% -100% 4 points
79% -89% 3 points
68% - 78% 2 points


narrative/video
Percentage of implementation of Point/s of the activities
Implementation of COVID-19 Protocols such Earned relative to
as setting of handwashing facilities, thermal COVID-19
scanner at the entrance, putting up of protocols with
ACR
triage, provision of PPEs such as facemask
and face shield to employees, regular
100% 4 points
95% -99% 3 points
90% -94% 2 points
4. DCP Package Utilization (3 points) ✓ Utilization report

Heightened use of DCP Package and other available of DCP Package
technologies integrated in the curriculum and by ICT (monthly
implementation on the ICT ingenuities that further or quarterly with
improve service of the school with the following pictorials),
indicators: Portfolio of
a. Presence of document that shows 100% usage learners’ outputs
of equipment of knowledge embodied in the in ICT- related
DCPpackage. activities, and
b. ICT integration in the curriculum has produced DCP related
a highly conducive and beneficial learning activities are
experience to the learner. present in the
SIP/AIP for at
least 2
maintenance of ICT. consecutive
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point

Report
facilities and equipment
Point/s Earned
maintained
90% -100% 4 points
70% - 89% 2 points


✓ Memorandum
Number of hours LAC ✓ LAC Plan/training
Number of INSETs
sessions are conducted Point/s designs approved by
conducted in a
in the department/grade Earned the Approving
year Authority of the SDO
level per month
evaluation, and other
8 hours 1 4 points
M&E Tools
2-3 hours 0 1 point
2. Attendance of staff different capability building ✓ SPPD/School Training

by SH
Participation/
appearance

other funds submitted at least 3 Accountant plus the
days before the deadline – 5 pts. authenticated
of September 30,
2022


deadline – 2 pts.

2. School Improvement Plan/AIP (5 points) ✓ SIP, AIP, WFP/APP

c. Information dissemination to stakeholders Program managers
✓ ACR
d. Implementation of PAPs ✓ SRC
through SMEA
Point/s Earned
indicator present
5 5 points
4 4 points
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
3. Basic Education –Learning Continuity Plan (BE- ✓ BE-LCP

LCP) (5 Points) Accomplishment
Percentage of Programs, Tracking Form
Projects, and Activities Point/s Earned
Implemented
100% 5 points
95% -99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% -89% 2 points
Percentage of LSAs (Parents, LGU paid, ✓ Schedule of
Assignments
and other Volunteers) who are actively Point/s
✓ Outputs/Results
involved in the Distance Learning Earned ✓ Accomplishment
Modality implementation Report
90% -100% 5 points
80% -89% 4 points
70% - 79% 3 points
60% -69% 2 points
Below 60% 1 point
2. Resources generated through Brigada- Eskwela and ✓ Project Proposal

other resource-generated initiatives (3 points) ✓ Deed of donations
✓ Deed of acceptance
JHS/SHS/IS/Stand Alone Points ✓ BE Report
Php400,000.00 and above 3 pts.

Php300,000.00 to 399,999.00 2 pts.
Php200,000.00 to 299,999.00 1 pt.


1. SBM Level of Practice (5 points) SBM Assessment
Toolas evaluated
SBM Validation and approved by
Allotted Points
Level Level the
III RO 5 points Division/Regional
SBM Task Force
✓ Certificate of
II Division 1 point Accreditation or level
duly signed by the
SDS/RD
SDO Coordinator and
District Nurse
3. Rewards and Recognition received by the school for ✓ Plaque/Certificate of
the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) Recognition/
Appreciation/medals
Note:
are cumulative.
4. Implementation of the School Banner Project (3.0 ✓ Project

points) Design/Manual
✓ Ingenuity of the Project - 0.5 pt. ✓ School
• This pertains to the nature and Improvement
originality of the project and Plan/AIP
thealignment of its objectives to ✓ Project
its target. The project should Implementation
have great impact to the current Plan
needsof the School. ✓ Resource
Generated for
School Banner
Project
implementation

✓ Advocacy Strategies – 0.5 pt. ✓ ACR (with highlights

• This pertains to the various of stakeholders’
strategies undertaken by the involvement
School to communicate the ✓ School Performance
banner project to the Indicators
internal and external ✓ Customers’
stakeholders and the School ✓ Feedback
draws support fromits
partners.

focus of the project. The Implementation
project should address the Plan
identified needs/weaknesses of
the School.
• Accomplishments relative to ✓ SMEA Results on

✓ Value Added
• Accomplishments should be based
Accomplishments
on the Annual Implementation

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING INTEGRATED SCHOOL

(ELEMENTARY AND JHS/SHS)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
0% 5 points
from the SDO

Baseline:75%
Baseline:75%

• Average grades of learners for the last two (2) ✓ Average Grades of
years (SY 2019-2020, and SY 2020-2021) x 0.05 Learners generated
from the LIS

Percentage of learners who are highly Point/s Assessment Result
numerates Earned (Pre and Post Tests)
90%-100% 5 points
80% - 89.99% 4 points
70% - 79.99% 3 points
60% - 69.99% 2 points


100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% - 89% 2 points

Report
f. ICT Integration

7 4 points
5-6 3 points
3-4 2 points
1-2 1 point


Design/s and ACR
Materials used
protection measures and protocols and anti- ✓ School Records of
bullying; Cases/complaints
Law

6 5 points
5 4 points
4 3 points
3 2 points
2 1 point

Percentage of implementation of the Point/s Earned
Management such as segregation of
Material Recovery Facility (NRF) and
Recycling Program
90% -100% 4 points
79% -89% 3 points
68% - 78% 2 points


narrative/video of the
Percentage of implementation of Point/s activities relative to
Implementation of COVID-19 Protocols such Earned COVID-19 protocols
as setting of handwashing facilities, thermal with ACR
scanner at the entrance, putting up of
triage, provision of PPEs such as facemask
and face shield to employees, regular
100% 4 points
95% -99% 3 points
90% -94% 2 points
4. DCP Package Utilization (3 points) ✓ Utilization report

Heightened use of DCP Package and other available of DCP Package
technologies integrated in the curriculum and by ICT (monthly
implementation on the ICT ingenuities that further or quarterly with
improve service of the school with the following pictorials),
indicators: Portfolio of
d. Presence of document that shows 100% usage learners’ outputs
of equipment of knowledge embodied in the in ICT- related
DCPpackage. activities, and
e. ICT integration in the curriculum has produced DCP related
a highly conducive and beneficial learning activities are
experience to the learner. present in the
SIP/AIP for at
f. The school implemented initiatives in the
least 2
maintenance of ICT. consecutive
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point

Percentage of learning Report
facilities and equipment
Point/s Earned
maintained
90% -100% 4 points
70% - 89% 2 points


Number of INSETs ✓ LAC Plan/training
sessions are conducted Point/s
conducted in a designs approved by
in the department/grade Earned
year the Approving
level per month Authority of the SDO
2-3 hours 0 1 point
2. Attendance of staff different building ✓ SPPD/School Training

capability
by SH
Participation/appearance
other funds submitted at least Accountant indicating
3 days before the deadline – 5 pts. the date ofthe
deadline of
liquidation plus the
other funds submitted 2 days authenticated
before the deadline – 4 pts. liquidation report as
• 100% liquidation of MOOE and of September 30,
other funds submitted 1 day 2022
deadline – 2 pts.
✓ School Improvement Plan/AIP (5 points)

a. Creation and Functionality of SPT ✓ SIP, AIP, WFP/APP
b. Alignment of AIP to SIP ✓ Attendance of
stakeholders, SPT,
Program managers
e. Quarterly review and adjustment conducted ✓ SRC
through SMEA ✓ SMEA
Point/s Earned
indicator present
5 5 points
4 4 points
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point

3. Basic Education –Learning Continuity Plan (BE-

LCP) (5 Points) ✓ BE-LCP
Accomplishment
Percentage of Programs,
Tracking Form
Projects, and Activities Point/s Earned
Implemented
100% 5 points
95% -99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
85% -89% 2 points
Percentage of LSAs (Parents, LGU paid, ✓ Schedule of
Assignments
and other Volunteers) who are actively Point/s
✓ Outputs/Results
involved in the Distance Learning Earned ✓ Accomplishment
Modality implementation Report
90% -100% 5 points
80% -89% 4 points
70% - 79% 3 points
60% -69% 2 points
Below 60% 1 point
JHS/SHS/IS Points ✓ Project Proposal

Php200,000.00 to 299,999.00 1 pt.

SBM Assessment Tool
as evaluated and
SBM Validation Allotted Points approved by the
Level Level Division/RegionalSBM
II Division 1 point Accreditation or level
duly signed by the
SDS/RD
duly certified by the
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 2 Stars – 1.5 pts.
SDO Coordinator and
• School’s WInS-OMS rating of 1 Star – 0.5 pts. District Nurse

3. Rewards and Recognition received by the school ✓ Plaque/Certificate of

for the current Calendar Year (2.5 points) Recognition/
Appreciation/medals
✓ Program
• Division – 1.5 pts.
invitation/Memo
Note:
highest governance level. Otherwise, points earned are
cumulative.
4. Implementation of the School Banner Project (3.0 ✓ Project

points) Design/Manual
✓ Ingenuity of the Project - 0.5 pt. ✓ School
• This pertains to the nature and originality ImprovementPlan/AIP
of the project and thealignment of its ✓ Project
objectives to its target. The project should ImplementationPlan
have great impact to the current needsof
the School.
✓ Resource
Generated for
School Banner
Project
implementation

✓ ACR (with highlights of
• This pertains to the various
stakeholders’
strategies undertaken by the School
to communicate the banner project involvement
to the internal and external ✓ School Performance
stakeholders and the School draws Indicators
support fromits partners. ✓ Customers’
✓ Feedback

• This depends on the target or ImplementationPlan
focus of the project. The project
should address the identified
needs/weaknesses of the School
✓ Accomplishments relative to-

School Banner Project Implementation – 1.0 pt. ✓ SMEA Results on
• Accomplishments should be basedon the School Banner
Annual Implementation Plan of the School Implementation
Banner Project.Value added Value Added
accomplishments shall be given additional Accomplishments
points based on merit set by the evaluators.

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL READING COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 rating ✓ SY2021-2022 and SY
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) 2022-2023 IPCRF duly
signed by authorities
Point/s Earned with date of signing
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 20 ✓ Special Order/Memorandum
authorities
(65 points)
Awardee in the District – 1 point
Awardee in the School
Note:
Otherwise, points earned are cumulative. ✓ Copy of the complete
manuscript of the
2. Research and Development Projects (5 points) implemented / conducted
2.1Conducted basic/action research approved by Research and Development
the DO Research Team (3 points) Project duly approved by the
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points SDS
Note:


2.2Presented a research paper (2 points) Letter
• National - 1.75 points a Research Presenter
✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based feeding approved proposal
program, medical/dental missions,tree planting, ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
clean-up drives, and other community report (depicting the extent
development activities or civic engagements to which the activity has
• Proponent/organizer - 5 points effectively and efficiently
• Member - 2.5 points addressed a pressing need
✓ Certificate of
Note:
4. Networking/Linkages (5 points) ✓ Approved and

✓ Initiated resource generation projects that enhance implemented proposal
the reading program implementation (for IGPs and otherspecial
programs/projects)
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs
✓ Member - 2.5 points orMOUs, deed of
donation/ acceptance or
any other validproof
✓ Accomplishment report
Note:
w/attachments: Pictures,
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earnedwill be WFP/POW
5. Other Meritorious Accomplishments (45 points)
✓ LP/DLL duly signed by
• Served as Demonstration Teacher on innovative atleast 3 authorities
reading techniques/ pedagogies (5 points) ✓ COT or Observation
National - 5 points Chart from at least 3
Region - 4 points observer- authorities
Division -3 points ✓ Student’s worksheet (if any)
District - 2 points ✓ Pictorial/Video
School - 1 point ✓ Certificate of Recognition
✓ Memorandum and Matrix
reflecting Demonstration
Teaching Activity (if it is
during training/seminar)
Note: At least 3 of the above-

stated MOVs

• Served as a mentor/coach to other reading ✓ Special Order duly

teachers (5 points) signed by the SDS
5 or more mentees - 5 points ✓ Accomplished
4 mentees - 4 points Performance
3 mentees - 3 points Monitoring and
2 mentees - 2 points Coaching Form or
only 1 mentee - 1 point accomplished LAMP
tools
• Organized/Facilitated actively in literacy

trainings/School LAC sessions regarding ✓ Certificates of
improvement of student’s reading Recognition/Appreciation
outcomes/profile (5 points) as Organizer/LFs in literacy
Leader/Organizer - 5 points trainings/SLAC
Resource Person - 3 points ✓ Activity Completion Report
Facilitator/Moderator - 1 point with attachments such as:
o Approved SLAC
Session Plan
o Resource Package
conduct
o Sample Program
o Attendance
o Pictorials
• Led in the preparation and enrichment of the ✓ Sample of developed

curriculum through development of reading IMs reading Instructional
adopted by the school (5 points) /materials duly signified by
quality-assurance team
Based on number of instructional materials (IMs) (RO/SDO/District/School)
5 or more IMs - 5 points
4 IMs - 4 points
3 IMs - 3 points
2 IMs - 2 points
1 IM - 1 point
• Led colleagues in the interpretation and ✓ Copy of the Analysis Report

utilization of the following analysis reports of duly certified ab deceived
Early Grades Reading Assessment (EGRA), by the School Head
Comprehensive Rapid Literacy Assessment ✓ Any MOVs (ACR, Action
(CLRA), Phil-IRI, and other contextualized Research, Reading
assessment tools for the improvement of reading Intervention/innovation)
outcomes (5 points) that show utilization of the
assessment results
One point for each of the analysis reports (ARs) ✓ Duly signed completion
made Report with MOVs
5 or more ARs - 5 points (approved Reading
4 ARs - 4 points Program proposal and
3 ARs - 3 points effective implementation
2 ARs - 2 points report of the reading
1 AR - 1 point program)
✓ Comparative data on the

School Reading Profile

(Phil-IRI, EGRA, CRLA,
• Implemented an effective school reading Contextualized Reading
program as seen in the improved reading profile Assessment) duly certified
of the school (20 points) and attested by the
following:
75% - 100% increase - 20 points
50% - 74% increase - 10 points District Level search – School
25% - 49% increase - 5 points Head
Note: Struggling Readers are those learners who fall Division Level search –PSDS
under the Frustration Level based on Phil-IRI- Filipino
Grades 3-6; Phil-IRI English Grades 4-6; EGRA Mother Regional Level search – Division
Tongue Kindergarten to Grade 3; EGRA Filipino Grade 2; Literacy Coordinator
EGRA English Grade 3 and those who are considered as
needing Full Refresher per CRLA Results (Grade 1 -
Mother Tongue, Grade2 Mother Tongue and Filipino;
and Grade 3 -Mother Tongue, Filipino and English)

• Complete Academic Requirements - 4.5 points ✓ Certificate of Completion
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree of Academic
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points Requirements /
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 3.5points Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
2.Learning and Development (5 points) ✓ Certificate of
Activities (such as trainings, seminars, workshops, DepEd or other
conferences, fora, etc.) agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
b. Validity of the learning and development activities shall be
within the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by the
& Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL PAPER ADVISER

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 rating ✓ SY2021-2022 and SY
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) 2022-2023 IPCRF duly
signed by authorities
Point/s Earned with date of signing
or advisership duly signed by
authorities
(60 points)
1.Outstanding Employee Award (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition
• National Awardee – 5 points /Certificate of
• Nomination in the Department/ Appreciation issued by
Awardee in the Region – 4 points DepEd or other
Note:
highest governance level. Otherwise, points
2. Innovation (5 points)
✓ Copy of the Innovation
• Adopted in the district - 4 points
documents with the name
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points of the Nominees duly
• Started the implementation - 2 points approved by the SDS (for
• Conceptualized - 1 point division, district, and school
Note: Regional Office nominees)
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be ✓ Certificate/Certification
divided by the number of researchers. signed by the SDS (for
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the division, district, and school

allotted points for the criterion. Regional Office nominees)
3. Research and Development Endeavors (5 points)

3.1Conducted in-depth basic/action research on
campus journalism approved by the DO Research ✓ Copy of the complete
Team (3 points) manuscript of the
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points implemented / conducted
Project duly approved by
the SDS
c. For group/team research, point/s earned will be scope of the Research Locale
divided by the number of researchers. as to where it was
d. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the conducted
2.2Presented a research paper (2 points)

Letter
• Division - 1.25 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• School - 1 point Certificate of Recognition
as a Research Presenter
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will be
divided by the ✓ Copy of the published book/
number of learning resources/articles
authors ✓ Certificate of Recognition
circulation not to
exceed 4
points
be divided by
the number of
writers

Learning Resources
Note:

position/designation (40 points) ✓ Certificate of
Recognition/Appreciation as

5.1 Sharing of Expertise or Provision of TA in Consultant/Resource

Journalism as Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning Speaker/Learning
Facilitator/Trainer/Project Organizer (6 points)
Facilitator/Trainer signed by
authorities
• Region - 4 points
✓ Certification
5.2 Leadership Related to Journalism (5 points) ✓ Memorandum showing list of
• Association President association officers
- National - 5 points ✓ Certification of
- Regional - 4 points Recognition/Certificate of
- Division - 3 points Appreciation issued by DepEd
or other agencies
- District - 2 points
/organizations sanctioned by
• Association Vice President/ DepEd
Association Publication Editor/EIC ✓ Memorandum/Advisory with
- National - 4 points attached search criteria
- Regional - 3 points
- Division - 2 points
- District - 1 point
• All other positions
- National - 4 points
- Regional - 3 points
- District - 1 point
5.3 Achievement in Journalism Contests in the Past
Three Years (29 points)
5.3.1 Coach of Individual Contests (10 points)
National Level Points Earned

1st Place 10 points
2nd to 3rd Place 9 points
4th to 5th Place 8 points
Regional Level Points Earned

1st to 3rd Place 6 points
7th Place 4 points
Division Level Point/s Earned

7th Place 1 point
Note:
b. For same awards received in a school year, points
are cumulative.
5.3.2 Coach of School Paper Group Contests (10 points)

✓ Certification of
National Level Points Earned Recognition/Certificate of
1st Place 10 points Appreciation issued by DepEd
2nd to 3rd Place 9 points or other agencies
DepEd
6th to 7th Place 7 points ✓ Memorandum/Advisory with
attached search criteria
Regional Level Points Earned
7th Place 4 points

7th Place 1 point
Note:
are cumulative.
5.3. 3 Coach of Group Contests (Team Category)

(9 points) ✓ Certification of
Recognition/Certificate of
National Level Points Earned Appreciation issued by DepEd
1st Place 9 points or other agencies
2nd Place 8 points /organizations sanctioned by
DepEd
3rd Place 7 points
✓ Memorandum/Advisory with
Regional Level Points Earned ✓
1st Place 6 points
2nd Place 5 points
3rd Place 4 points

1st Place 3 points
2nd Place 2 points
3rd Place 1 point
Note:
are cumulative.

Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:
Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL PROPERTY CUSTODIAN

RUBEN O. MAGOS
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Admin Officer I
Position: _____________________School/District/Area: Dulag NHS/Dulag South/ Area-IIB
_________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) authorities with date
of signing
authorities
(40 points)
• Nomination in the District /
Awardee in the School – 1 point
Note:
c. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe
d. For same awards received in a calendar year,points
earned shall be based on the award received in
the highest governance level. Otherwise, points
2.Innovation (5 points) ✓ Copy of the Innovation

• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points documents with the name
of the Nominees duly
approved by the SDS (for
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points division, district, and school
• Conceptualized - 1 point Regional Office nominees)


a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be nominees) or RD (for
divided by the number of researchers. Regional Office nominees)

3.1Conducted basic/action research on campus manuscript of the
journalism approved by the DO Research Team implemented / conducted
(1.5 points) Research and Development
• Regional/Division Level - 1.5 points Project duly approved by the
SDS
• District Level - 1 point
• School Level - 0.5 point Research Committee on the
3.2Presented a research paper (1.5 points) ✓ Memorandum / Invitation

• International - 1.5 points Letter

✓ Copy of the published book/
learning resources/articles
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will
be divided by
the number of
authors
circulation not to
exceed 4
points
be divided by
the number of
writers

Learning Resources
Note:

5.Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning
Facilitator/Trainer (5 points) ✓ Certificate of
• International/National - 5 points Recognition/Appreciation as
• Regional - 4 points Consultant/Resource
• Division/Provincial - 3 points Speaker/Learning
• District/Municipal - 2 points Facilitator/Trainer issued by
• School/Barangay - 1 point DepEd or other agencies/
Note: organizations sanctioned by
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed DepEd

✓ Transmittal of RPCPPE with
date of receipt by Division
6.1 Updated Report on the Physical Count of PPE and Office and other concerned
Report on Physical Count of Inventories (7 points) Office/s
• Complete and accurate - 7 points ✓ Transmittal of RCPI with date
(submitted before the deadline) of receipt by SDO Supply
• Complete and accurate - 4 points Officer and other concerned
(submitted on the deadline) Office/s
✓ Transmittal from District
/School/Division
6.2 Updated and Timely Submission of Report of

Supplies and Materials Issued (RSMI) Reports on ✓ Transmittal letters of RSMI
Modules/TVL Tools and Equipment/DepEd and Other reports on
Computerization Program (5 points) Modules/TVL/DCP – Current
• 100% submitted - 5 points year (2022)
before the deadline
• 100% submitted - 3 points
on the deadline
6.3 Updated and Timely Submission of Report on ✓ Transmittal letters of NSBI

National School Building Inventory (NSBI) (5 points) Reports submitted – to
• 100% submitted - 5 points Division (transmittal letter to
before the deadline
the Division planning Officer)
• 100% submitted - 3 points
on the deadline
✓ Appreciation issued by DepEd
or other agencies
DepEd
✓ Memorandum/Advisory with


• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points Certification of Units
Doctor’s Degree units Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:
Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL YOUTH FORMATOR

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) authorities with date of
signing
authorities
(65 points)
Note:
are cumulative.

• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points documents with the name
of the Nominees duly
approved by the SDS (for


a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be nominees) or RD (for
divided by the number of researchers. Regional Office nominees)
3. Research and Development Endeavors (5 points) ✓ Copy of the complete

3.1Conducted in-depth basic/action research on manuscript of the
campus journalism approved by the DO Research implemented / conducted
Team (3 points) Research and Development
SDS

✓ Certificate of
4. Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning Recognition/Appreciation as
Facilitator/Trainer (5 points) Consultant/Resource
• International/National - 5 points Speaker/Learning
• Regional - 4 points Facilitator/Trainer issued by
• Division/Provincial - 3 points DepEd or other agencies/
• District/Municipal - 2 points organizations sanctioned by
• School/Barangay - 1 point DepEd
Note: ✓ Copy of the approved
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to proposal
exceed the allotted points for the criterion ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
5.Outreach Activity (10 points) to which the activity has
✓ Conducted community outreach activities with the effectively and efficiently
SSG/SPG/Yes-O, like tree planting, clean-up drives, addressed a pressing need
and other community development activities or or improved service
civic engagements delivery/learning outcome)
Number of
Point/s Point/s
Activities Role Role ✓ Certificate of
Earned Earned
Conducted Recognition/Participation
At least 5 10 pts. 5 pts. ✓ Hard copy of advocacy
material
4 8 pts. 4 pts.
✓ Distribution
3 Proponent/Organizer 6 pts. Member 3 pts. list/acknowledgment
2 4 pts. 2 pts. receipt
1 2 pts. 1 pt.


6.1 Partnerships for implementation of Youth

Programs
✓ Hard copy of advocacy
6.1.1 Prepared advocacy campaign materials to material
increase awareness of stakeholders and gather ✓ Distribution
resource support for youth programs (5 points) list/acknowledgment receipt
Number of Produced
Percentage of
advocacy campaign Point/s
Distribution to
materials, printed, and Earned
Schools
distributed
At least 1 At least 90% 5 points
At least 1 80%-89% 4 points
At least 1 50%-59% 1 point
6.1.2 Established partnerships in the implemented

youth programs (10 points)
No. of Memorandum of Agreement

(MOA)/ Memorandum of Point/ s ✓ Copy of the approved
Understanding (MOU)/Deed of Earned proposal
Donation (DOD)/ Deed of Acceptance ✓ Copy of MOAs or
(DOA)/Contract approved, MOUs/ Deed of
implemented, and monitored Donation/Acceptance/Contract
5 or more MOA/MOU/DOD/Contract 10 points approved, implemented, and
approved, implemented, and monitored
monitored ✓ Accomplishment Report w/
4 MOA/MOU/DOD/Contract 8 points attachments: Pictures
monitored
3 MOA/MOU/DOD/Contract 6 points
monitored
monitored
monitored
MOA/MOU/DOD/Contract approved 1 point
but not implemented (regardless of
the number)
Note:
MOA/MOU/DOD/DOA/Contract shall be counted from
6.2 Programs and Projects (for Youth) (15 points)

With approved concept papers and program/project
designs and proposals for program/projects for the
children and youth

Number of Programs and Point/s Earned ✓ Concept Paper

Projects Implemented ✓ Program/Project Completion
Report
At least 5 15 points
4 12 points
3 9 points
2 6 points
1 3 points
6.3 Awardee for Outstanding Implementation of any Youth

Formation Program (e.g. Gawad Siklab, etc.) (5 points)
(for the last 3 years)
Governance ✓ Certificate of Recognition

Award Point/s Earned
Level
National 1st 5 points
2nd 4 points
Regional 1st 3 points
2nd 2 points
Division 1st 1 point
Note:
C. Education & Learning and Development (10

points)
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of -3.5points
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:


Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL WinS COORDINATOR

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) authorities with date
of signing
authorities
(65 points)
Note:
are cumulative.
2.Innovation (5 points)
• Adopted in the district - 4 points ✓ Copy of the Innovation
documents with the name
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points of the Nominees duly
• Started the implementation - 2 points approved by the SDS (for
Note: Regional Office nominees)
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be ✓ Certificate/Certification
divided by the number of researchers. signed by the SDS (for

b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed division, district, and school
the allotted points for the criterion. nominees) or RD (for
3.1Conducted basic/action research approved by
the DO Research Team (5 points)
• Regional/Division Level - 5 points ✓ Copy of the complete
• District Level - 4 points manuscript of the
Note: SDS
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be ✓ Certification from the SDO
divided by the number of researchers. Research Committee on the
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the scope of the Research Locale
allotted points for the criterion. as to where it was conducted

• Division - 2 points Letter
• School - 1 point ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
Certificate of Recognition
4. Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning as a Research Presenter
Facilitator/Trainer (5 points)
✓ Certificate of
Consultant/Resource
Speaker/Learning
• School/Barangay - 1 point Facilitator/Trainer issued by
Note: DepEd or other agencies/
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed organizations sanctioned by
DepEd


position/designation (40 points)
5.1 Networking/Linkages (20 points)

Generated resources that contributed to the realization
✓ Copy of the approved
of the school’s programs and projects
proposal
✓ Copy of partnership or MOAs
No. of Memorandum of Agreement or MOUs or Deed of
(MOA)/ Memorandum of Understanding Point/ s Earned Donations or Acceptance or
(MOU)/Deed of Donation (DOD)/ Deed any valid proof
of Acceptance (DOA)/Contract ✓ Activity /Project Completion
approved, implemented Report
6 or more 20 points
5 18 points
4 16 points
3 14 points
2 12 points
1 10 points
5.2 3-Star Approach (20 points)
3 stars for 3 consecutive years - 20 points

3 stars for 2 consecutive years - 15 points
3 stars for 1 year - 10 points
2 stars - 5 points
1 year - 3 points

• Complete Academic Requirements - 4.5 points ✓ Certificate of Completion
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree of Academic
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points Requirements /
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 3.5 points Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Activities (such as trainings, seminars, workshops, DepEd or other
conferences, fora, etc.) agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
Note:

within the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by the
& Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL DRRM COORDINATOR

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 ✓ IPCRF duly signed by authorities
rating periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) with date of signing
• SY2021-2022 and SY 2022-
Point/s Earned 2023
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 15 ✓ Special Order/Memorandum issued as to
coordinatorship or advisership duly signed
by authorities
(70 points)
1.Outstanding Employee Award (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Recognition /Certificate
• National Awardee –5 of Appreciation issued by DepEd or
points other agencies/organizations
• Nomination in the Department/ sanctioned by DepEd
Awardee in the Region –4 ✓ Memorandum / Advisory with attached
points search criteria
Awardee in the Provincial Level
• Nomination in the Region /
Note:
Otherwise, points earned are cumulative. ✓ Copy of the Innovation documents with
the name of the Nominees duly approved
2.Innovation (5 points) by the SDS (for division, district, and
school nominees) or RD (for Regional
• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points Office nominees)
• Adopted in the district - 4 points ✓ Certificate/Certification signed by the SDS
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points (for division, district, and school nominees)
• Started the implementation - 2 points or RD (for Regional Office nominees)
• Conceptualized - 1 point
Note:
the allotted points for the criterion. ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript of the

implemented / conducted Research and

Development Project duly approved by the
3. Research and Development Projects (5 points) SDS
3.1Conducted basic/action research approved by ✓ Certification from the SDO Research
the DO Research Team (3 points) Committee on the scope of the Research
Locale as to where it was conducted
Note:
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. ✓ Memorandum / Invitation Letter
✓ Certificate of Appreciation / Certificate
3.2Presented a research paper (2 points) of Recognition as a Research Presenter
• Regional -1.50 points

✓ Copy of the Policy/Memorandum
the position/designation (55 points)
4.1 Enabling Environment (18 points)

4.1.1 Adopted/adapted/localized existing
policies relating to DRRM/CCA/EiE in
Education/School Safety (3 points)
Number of adopted/adapted/localized
existing policies relating to Point/s
DRRM/CCA/EiE in Education/School Earned
Safety
3 or more 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
✓ Copy of the School DRRM Team with Roles
4.1.2 Formed School DRRM Team, with a focal and Functions
person and consisting of personnel from
different grade levels, with defined
memberships and roles and
responsibilities/functions (3 points)
These elements are:

a. DRRM Team
b. Focal Person
c. Members of the team are from different Grade
Levels
d. Defined memberships and roles and
responsibilities
• Presence of all 4 elements in the criterion - 3 points

• Presence of 2-3 elements - 2 points
• Presence of 1 element - 1 point

✓ DRRM Plan
4.1.3 Has prepared a comprehensive DRRM Plan,

which includes Climate Change Adaptation
(CCA) and Education in Emergency (EiE)
measures, covering risk assessment, risk
reduction, and rehabilitation and recovery (3
points)
These elements are:
a. Comprehensive DRRM Plan
b. Inclusion of CCA and EiE measures
c. With risk assessment, risk reduction, and
rehabilitation and recovery
• Presence of all 3 elements - 3 points ✓ Consolidated report

• Presence of only 2 - 2 points
• Presence of only 1 - 1 point
4.1.4 Collected and consolidated data on programs

and activities on DRRM, covering the three (3)
pillars, to monitor results and impact exists (1
point)
• Availability of the collected and - 1 point
consolidated data on programs
and activities on DRRM covering
✓ RADAR Report / Copy / Screenshot of
the three (3) pillars
report submitted (those who failed to
4.1.5 Rapid Assessment of Damages Report access the RADAR templates)
(RADAR) is submitted to Central Office within 72
hours after the onslaught of calamities in the area
(2 points)
• Submission within 72 hours through - 2 points
any means of communication
(online/offline)
• Submission beyond 72 hours - 1 point
Note: For areas which were not hit by any calamity ✓ DRRM Plan
the submission of “No Damages Incurred” ✓ ACR
certificate should likewise be within 72 hours
4.1.6 Completion of DRR activities in the EMIS

(3 points)
✓ 86% - 100% completion - 3 points
✓ 60% - 85% completion - 2 points ✓ Copy of the approved proposal
✓ 30% - 59% completion - 1 point ✓ Copy of partnership or MOAs or MOUs or
Deed of Donations or Acceptance or any
valid proof
4.1.7 Networking/Linkages (3 points)
✓ Activity/Project Completion Report

Initiated resource generation projects and / or ✓ Risk assessment report

programs for DRRM implementation, with proof of ✓ Any evidence of partnership engagement
stakeholder engagement and support
No. of Memorandum of Agreement

Point/ s
(MOA)/ Memorandum of Understanding
Earned
(MOU)/Deed of Donation (DOD)/ Deed of
Acceptance (DOA approved &
implemented
3 3 points
2 2 points
1 1 point
4.2 Pillar 1: Safe Learning Facilities (12 points) ✓ Picture of cordoned-off buildings/proof
4.2.1 Conducted risk assessment of buildings in of retrofitting and upgrading
coordination with the Education Facilities
Division and support of other agencies and
partners (6 points)
Elements are: ✓ Fire safety certificate
a. The conduct of risk assessment and ✓ Inspection report/Program of works
b. Engagement of partners
• Presence of all elements in the criterion -6

points
• Conducted risk assessment but did not -3
points
engage partners
4.2.2 Has taken appropriate action on unsafe

buildings (upgraded, retrofitted, non-usage, etc)
✓ Workable Contingency Plan
(3 points)
• Presence of evidence on action taken -3
points
4.2.3 Engaged other appropriate offices on the

conduct of regular fire safety inspection, and/or ✓ Tracking System
repair of minor damage and facilities (3 points)
• Conducted inspection and taken - 3 points
appropriate measures
• Conducted inspection but no action - 1 point
was taken
4.3 Pillar 2: School Disaster Risk Management (16 ✓ Pictures

points)
4.3.1 School has a Contingency Plan or
Preparedness Plan which has been/can be turned
into response action when disaster strikes (1
point) ✓ Pictures/validation report of SDO
• Crafted Contingency Plan/ - 1 point personnel
Preparedness Plan
4.3.2 School has established a school personnel

and learner tracking system/protocol in the
✓ Pictures/receipts
event of a disaster or emergency (1 point)
• Established school personnel - 1 point
and learner tracking system/protocol

4.3.3 Hazard and evacuation maps are located in

conspicuous places in schools (1 point)
• Hazard and evacuation maps - 1 point
are posted at the designated places
✓ ACR with pictures
4.3.4 School has available, accessible, and
adequate first aid kit in every instructional
classroom (1 point)
• School first aid kits are available, accessible, - 1
point
and adequate in every classroom
4.3.5 School has at least 2 necessary and ✓ Protocol

functioning equipment in case of disaster (e.g. ✓ Warning device
fire extinguisher, hand-held radio, generator, ✓ Warning signs
etc.) (2 points) ✓ DRRM Bulletin Board
• Presence of at least 2 equipment as per -2 ✓ Orientation Report/ACR
points
criterion
• Presence of only 1 equipment - 1 point
4.3.6 School has conducted regular quarterly

hazard-specific drills with participation of ✓ ACR
stakeholders (2 points)
• Conducted quarterly drills - 2 points
(4 times in a year) with stakeholders
• Conducted quarterly drills -1 point
(4 times in a year) without stakeholders ✓ School Development Plan
4.3.7 School has established functional early

warning system to inform students and
personnel of hazards and emergencies (protocol,
warning signs, devices, IEC) considering national
and LGU systems and protocols (2 points)
• Presence of an early warning system -2
points ✓ Education Continuity Plan
with evidence of the conduct of
orientation
• Presence of an early warning system -1 point
but no orientation was conducted
4.3.8 School has trained personnel to administer

first aid to students and personnel (1 point) ✓ Intervention Plan
• Availability of trained personnel - 1 point
to administer first aid to students and personnel
4.3.9 School has pre-identified space for putting

up Temporary Learning Spaces/shelters in the ✓ ACR
aftermath of a disaster or emergency (1 point)
• School has pre-identified space - 1 point
for putting up Temporary Learning
Spaces/shelters in the aftermath of
a disaster or emergency
4.3.10 School has ready resumption strategies

and alternative delivery modes to ensue ✓ Evacuation Plan
education continuity (strategies, materials, focal
persons to implement) (1 point)

• Availability of education - 1 point

continuity plan
✓ DLL/DLP
4.3.11 School has psychosocial intervention plan
for personnel and students (1 point)
• Availability of psychosocial - 1 point
intervention plan
4.3.12 School has trained teachers and other

personnel who could provide Mental Health and
Psychosocial Support Services to students and
✓ ACR
personnel (1 point)
• Conducted training to teachers/ - 1 point
personnel in the provision of Mental
Health and Psychosocial Support Services
to students and personnel ✓ Training plan
4.3.13 School has an Evacuation Plan and

Procedures (1 point)
• Crafted evacuation plan - 1 point
4.4 Pillar 3: DRR in Education (9 points)

4.4.1 School has Integrated DRRM/CCA/EiE ✓ Certificate of Participation
concepts in different subjects based on the ✓ Memorandum/Communication/Invitation
National Curriculum Guide (4 points)
• Integrated in 4 or more subjects -4 points
• Integrated in 3 subjects -3 points ✓ Screenshot/pictures of IEC Materials
• Integrated in 2 subjects -2 points
• Integrated in 1 subject -1 point
4.4.2 Students and personnel have participated

in various DRRM/CCA/EiE activities (1 point) ✓ Picture of DRRM corner in classrooms
• With evidence of participation -1 point
4.4.3 School has a DRRM/CCA/EiE capacity

building plan for teachers and personnel (1
point)
• Availability of training plan -1 point
4.4.4 School head/ personnel have attended

DRRM/CCA/EiE training from DepEd or
stakeholders (1 point)
• Attended at least 1 DRRM/ -1 point
CCA/EiE training from DepEd
or stakeholders
4.4.5 DRRM/CCA/EiE resource materials are

available in the school (1 point)
• At least 1 DRRM/ CCA/EiE resource -1 point
materials are available in the school
4.4.6 Presence of DRRM corner, with updated

IEC materials posted in every classroom (1 point)
• Updated DRRM corner in every -1 point
classroom

points)
• Complete Academic Requirements - 4.5 points ✓ Certificate of Completion of Academic
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree Requirements / Certification of Units
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - Earned
4points Doctor’s Degree units
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of -
3.5points Laws (Juris Doctor)
2.Learning and Development (5 points) ✓ Certificate of Participation issued by
✓ Participation to Learning and Development DepEd or other
Activities (such as trainings, seminars, agencies/organizations sanctioned by
workshops, conferences, fora, etc.) DepEd
Note:
✓ Interview and essay shall be conducted ✓ Potential/Interview Checklist & Rating
Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION MADRASAH EDUCATION PROGRAM (MEP) COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
(MOVs)
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 rating ✓ IPCRF duly signed
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) by authorities with
date of signing
Point/s Earned • SY2021-2022
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 25 and SY 2022-
2023
or advisership duly signed
by authorities
(60 points)
1.Outstanding Employee Award (5 points) ✓ Certificate of
• National Awardee – 5 points Recognition /Certificate
• Nomination in the Department/ of Appreciation issued
Awardee in the Region – 4 points by DepEd or other
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe allotted points
for the criterion.
b. For same awards received in a calendar year, points earned
shall be based on the award received in the highest governance
level. Otherwise, points earned are cumulative.

• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points documents with the
• Adopted in the district - 4 points name of the Nominees
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points duly approved by the
SDS (for division, district,
• Started the implementation - 2 points
and school nominees) or
• Conceptualized - 1 point RD (for Regional Office
Note: nominees)
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be divided ✓ Certificate/Certification
by the number of researchers. signed by the SDS (for
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the division, district, and
allotted points for the criterion. school nominees) or RD

(for Regional Office

nominees)

• Regional/Division Level - 3 points Research and
• District Level - 2 points Development Project duly
• School Level - 1 point approved by the SDS
Research Committee on
Note: the scope of the Research
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be divided Locale as to where it was
by the number of researchers. conducted
3.2Presented a research paper (2 points) ✓ Memorandum/

• International - 2 points Invitation Letter
• National - 1.75 points ✓ Certificate of
• Regional - 1.50 points Appreciation / Certificate
of Recognition as a
Research Presenter

• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will be ✓ Copy of the published
divided by the book/articles or
number of authors developed/contextualized
• Article published in a journal/ - 1 point per learning resources/IEC
newspaper/ magazine of wide article but not ✓ Certificate of Recognition
circulation not to
exceed 4
points
Of LRs/IEC
divided by the
number of writers
• Member of the Development/ - 0.5 point in Quality

Assurance team (Content each LR but
Learning Resources
Note:
✓ Certificate of


Note:
allotted points for the criterion ✓ Copy of approved proposal
(for IGPs and other special
6. Networking/Linkages (5 points) programs/projects
✓ Initiated resource generation projects and/or programs that
will benefit the school
MOUs, deed of
Proponent/organizer - 5 points donation/acceptance or any
Member - 2.5 points valid proof
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earned will be WFP/POW
divided by the number of proponents
7. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to the ✓ Narrative accomplishment

position/designation (30 points) report (depicting the extent
7.1 Conduct of Professional Development Programs (15 to which the activity has
points) effectively and efficiently
or improved service
Conducted professional development program/activity that
addressed the needs of the asatidz/school heads of the MEP
with attachments: Pictorials
implementing schools related to the PAPs
supervised/coordinated
✓ Certificate of
Proponent/organizer - 10 points Recognition/Participation
Member - 5 points ✓ Memorandum for the
conduct of the
Note: program/activity
✓ Approved WFP reflected in

7.2 Utilization of the Downloaded PSF (15 points) the PMIS ad duly signed by
Percentage of Utilization of the SDS
Point/s Earned
Downloaded PSF ✓ Accomplishment Report
100% 15 points signed by the Focal Person,
98% - 99% 14 points Coordinator, Chief, Budget
96% - 97% 13 points Officer, and SDS
94% -95% 12 points ✓ ACR, Impact evaluation,
and other M&E Tools
92% - 93% 11 points
90% - 91% 10 points
85% - 89% 8 points
80% - 84% 6 points
75% - 79% 5 points
70% - 74% 4 points


• Complete Academic Requirements - 4.5 points ✓ Certificate of
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree Completion of
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4points Academic Requirements
Doctor’s Degree units / Certification of Units
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 3.5points Laws Earned
(Juris Doctor)
✓ Participation to Learning and Development Activities Participation issued by
(such as trainings, seminars, workshops, conferences, DepEd or other
fora, etc.) agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
PRAISE committee.
Checklist & Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION INDIGENOUS PEOPLES EDUCATION PROGRAM (IPEd) COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
(MOVs)
1. Performance Rating of the nominee for the last 2 rating ✓ IPCRF duly signed
periods should be Outstanding (4.50 and above) by authorities with
date of signing
Point/s Earned • SY2021-2022
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 25 and SY 2022-
2023
or advisership duly signed
by authorities
(60 points)
the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by theDivision
PRAISE committee.
1.Outstanding Employee Award (5 points) ✓ Certificate of
• National Awardee – 5 points Recognition /Certificate
• Nomination in the Department/ of Appreciation issued
Awardee in the Region – 4 points by DepEd or other
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceedthe allotted points
for the criterion.
b. For same awards received in a calendar year, points earned
shall be based on the award received in the highest governance
level. Otherwise, points earned are cumulative.

• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points documents with the
• Adopted in the district - 4 points name of the Nominees
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points duly approved by the
SDS (for division, district,
• Started the implementation - 2 points
and school nominees) or
• Conceptualized - 1 point RD (for Regional Office
Note: nominees)
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be divided by ✓ Certificate/Certification
the number of researchers. signed by the SDS (for
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the division, district, and
allotted points for the criterion. school nominees) or RD

(for Regional Office

nominees)

• Regional/Division Level - 3 points Research and
• District Level - 2 points Development Project duly
• School Level - 1 point approved by the SDS
Research Committee on
Note: the scope of the Research
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be divided Locale as to where it was
3.2Presented a research paper (2 points) ✓ Memorandum/

• International - 2 points Invitation Letter
• National - 1.75 points ✓ Certificate of
• Regional - 1.50 points Appreciation / Certificate
of Recognition as a
Research Presenter

• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will be ✓ Copy of the published
divided by the book/articles or
number of authors developed/contextualized
circulation not to
exceed 4
points
Of LRs/IEC
divided by the
number of writers
• Member of the Development/ - 0.5 point in Quality

Assurance team (Content each LR but
Learning Resources
Note:
✓ Certificate of


Note:
allotted points for the criterion ✓ Copy of approved proposal
(for IGPs and other special
programs/projects
✓ Initiated resource generation projects and/or programs that
will benefit the school ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or
MOUs, deed of
Proponent/organizer - 5 points donation/acceptance or any
Member - 2.5 points valid proof
b. For more than one proponent, point/s earned will be
WFP/POW
divided by the number of proponents
7.Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to the ✓ Narrative accomplishment

position/designation (30 points) report (depicting the extent
7.1 Conduct of Professional Development Programs (15 to which the activity has
points) effectively and efficiently
Conducted professional development program/activity that or improved service
addressed the needs of the teachers handling IPED/school heads delivery/learning outcome)
of the IPED implementing schools related to the PAPs with attachments: Pictorials
supervised/coordinated written output, video
✓ Certificate of
Proponent/organizer - 15 points Recognition/Participation
Member - 7 points ✓ Memorandum for the
Note: conduct of the
program/activity
7.2 Utilization of the Downloaded PSF (15 points) ✓ Approved WFP reflected in
the PMIS ad duly signed by
Percentage of Utilization of the
Point/s Earned SDS
Downloaded PSF
✓ Accomplishment Report
100% 15 points
signed by the Focal Person,
98% - 99% 14 points Coordinator, Chief, Budget
96% - 97% 13 points Officer, and SDS
94% -95% 12 points ✓ ACR, Impact evaluation,
92% - 93% 11 points and other M&E Tools
90% - 91% 10 points
85% - 89% 8 points
80% - 84% 6 points
75% - 79% 5 points
70% - 74% 4 points


• Complete Academic Requirements - 4.5 points ✓ Certificate of
for Doctorate/Doctor’s Degree Completion of
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate/ - 4 points Academic Requirements
Doctor’s Degree units / Certification of Units
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor of - 3.5 points Earned
Laws (Juris Doctor)
✓ Participation to Learning and Development Activities Participation issued by
(such as trainings, seminars, workshops, conferences, DepEd or other
fora, etc.) agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
Note:
PRAISE committee.
Checklist & Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING DIVISION YOUTH FORMATOR

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
Point/s Earned • CY2021 and CY 2022
authorities
(65 points)
Note:
points earned shall be based on the award received
in the highest governance level. Otherwise, points
• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points ✓ Copy of the Innovation
documents with the name of
the Nominees duly approved
nominees)
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be signed by the SDS (for
divided by the number of researchers. division, district, and school



3.1Conducted in-depth basic/action research on
campus journalism approved by the DO Research ✓ Copy of the complete
Team (3 points) manuscript of the
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points implemented / conducted
• District Level - 2 points Research and Development
SDS
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be scope of the Research Locale
divided by the number of researchers. as to where it was conducted

a Research Presenter
✓ Certificate of
Note: ✓ Copy of the approved
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to proposal
exceed the allotted points for the criterion ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment
5.Outreach Activity (10 points) to which the activity has
✓ Conducted community outreach activities with effectively and efficiently
the SSG/SPG/Yes-O, like tree planting, clean-up addressed a pressing need
drives, and other community development or improved service
activities or civic engagements delivery/learning outcome)
Number of written output, video
Point/s Point/s
Activities Role
Earned
Role
Earned
✓ Certificate of
Conducted Recognition/Participation
At least 5 10 pts. 5 pts.
4 8 pts. 4 pts.
3 Proponent/Organizer 6 pts. Member 3 pts.
2 4 pts. 2 pts.
1 2 pts. 1 pt.


6.1 Partnerships for implementation of Youth

Programs
✓ Hard copy of advocacy material
6.1.1 Prepared advocacy campaign materials to ✓ Distribution
increase awareness of stakeholders and gather list/acknowledgment receipt
resource support for youth programs (5 points)
Number of Produced
Percentage of
advocacy campaign Point/s
Distribution to
materials, printed, and Earned
Schools
distributed
At least 1 At least 90% 5 points
At least 1 50%-59% 1 point
6.1.2 Established partnerships in the implemented

youth programs (10 points)
No. of Memorandum of Agreement ✓ Copy of the approved proposal

(MOA)/ Memorandum of Point/ s ✓ Copy of MOAs or
Understanding (MOU)/Deed of Earned MOUs/ Deed of
Donation (DOD)/ Deed of Acceptance Donation/Acceptance/Contract
(DOA)/Contract approved, approved, implemented, and
implemented, and monitored monitored
5 or more MOA/MOU/DOD/Contract 10 points ✓ Accomplishment Report w/
approved, implemented, and attachments: Pictures
monitored
monitored
monitored
monitored
monitored
MOA/MOU/DOD/Contract approved 1 point
but not implemented (regardless of
the number)
Note:
MOA/MOU/DOD/DOA/Contract shall be counted from
✓ Concept Paper

6.2 Programs and Projects (for Youth) (15 points) ✓ Program/Project Completion
With approved concept papers and program/project Report
designs and proposals for program/projects for the
children and youth
Number of Programs and Point/s Earned

Projects Implemented
4 12 points
3 9 points
2 6 points
1 2 points
6.3 Awardee for Outstanding Implementation of any
Youth Formation Program (e.g. Gawad Siklab, etc.) (5
points)
(for the last 3 years)
Governance
Award Point/s Earned
Level
National 1st 5 points
2nd 4 points
Regional 1st 3 points
2nd 2 points
Division 1st 1 point
Note:

(10 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)

Note:
Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING DIVISION DRRM COORDINATOR

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
signing
authorities
(70 points)
• Nomination in the Region / ✓ Memorandum / Advisory with
Awardee in the Division – 3 points attached search criteria
Note:
2.Innovations (5 points)
• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points ✓ Copy of the Innovation
documents with the name of the
• Adopted in the district - 4 points Nominees duly approved by the
• Fully implemented in the school - 3 points SDS (for division, district, and
• Started the implementation - 2 points school nominees) or RD (for
the SDS (for division, district, and
Note: school nominees) or RD (for
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be Regional Office nominees)

3. Research and Development Projects (5 points)

3.1Conducted basic/action research approved
by the DO Research Team (3 points) ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points of the implemented / conducted
• District Level - 2 points Project duly approved by the SDS
Research Committee on the scope
Note: of the Research Locale as to where
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be it was conducted

• Regional -1.50 points ✓ Memorandum / Invitation
• Division - 1.25 points Letter
• School - 1 point ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
Research Presenter
Facilitator (5 points)
• International/ National - 5 points
✓ Certificate of
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to Recognition/Appreciation as
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. Consultant/Resource
Speaker/Learning
5.Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to Facilitator/Trainer signed by DepEd
the position/designation (50 points) or other agencies/organizations
sanctioned by DepEd
5.1 Risk-Informed Plans, Policies, and Standards
(5 points)
Developed/enhanced/contextualized and
disseminated risk-informed plans, policies, and
standards for implementation (5 points)
Number of policies and standards

Point/s
developed/enhanced/contextualized
Earned
and disseminated for implementation
3 or more 5 points
2 4 points
1 3 points
Note:
a. The Contingency Plan shall be considered as one ✓ Copy of Policies and standards
(1) Risk-Informed Plan developed/enhanced/contextualiz

ed
✓ Memorandum
5.2 Partnerships for Strengthening Resilience
(10 points)
Initiated resource generation projects and/or
programs that will benefit the schools (5 points)
Proponent/organizer - 10 points
Member - 5 points
Note:
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earned will
✓ Copy of the approved proposal
5.3 Information, Education & Advocacy (For DRRM)
✓ ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or
(10 points)
5.3.1 Crafted/adopted/adapted NDRRM materials to MOUs, deed of donation/
local situation and published/distributed such material acceptance/ Contract
for resource generation and support advocacy ✓ Accomplishment report w/
(5 points) attachments: Pictures
• Crafted/adapted/adopted at least - 5 points

one (1) advocacy materials and
published/distributed for resource
generation and support
• Crafted/ adopted/adapted - 2.5 points
advocacy materials but not published ✓ Hard copy of advocacy material
5.3.2 Developed Communication Plans on DRRM for ✓ Distribution list/ acknowledgment
the agency and stakeholders (5 points) receipt
• With duly approved and disseminated - 5 points

Communication Plans
• Communication Plan is duly approved - 2.5 points
but not disseminated
5.4 Programs and Projects (for DRRM) (10 points)

With approved concept papers and program/project designs
and proposals for programs/ projects for DRRM and climate
change/ environmental risk reduction ✓ Copy of the approved
• At least one (1) Concept paper – 10 points Communication Plan ✓
with program/project design and Memorandum
proposal for programs/ projects
for DRRM and climate change/
environmental risk reduction was
approved and implemented
• At least one (1) Concept paper – 7 points
with program/project design and
approved but not implemented
✓ Concept Paper
• At least one (1) Concept paper – 4 points ✓ Any proof of implementation
with program/project design and
drafted but not approved

5.5 Monitoring of DRR in Education (15 points)

5.5.1 Monitoring of schools and provision of
Technical Assistance on DRRM, CCA, EiE, and ✓ Accomplished monitoring Tools/
Peace Building Activities (10 points) Signed recommendation to
management on interventions and
programs to respond to DRRM
Description Percentage Points
needs of schools
90-100% 10 points
✓ Certificate of Appearance
80-89% 8 points
Percentage of ✓ Pictures
schools in AOR, 70-79% 7 points
monitored and 60-69% 6 points
provided technical 50-59% 5 points
assistance in
developing 40-49% 4 points
programs and 30-39% 3 points
projects for DRRM 20-29% 2 points
5.5.2 Percentage of Fund Utilization (5 points)

✓ Certification from Budget/Finance
Percentage of Utilization Point/s Earned
80-100% 5 points
60-79% 4 points
40-59% 3 points
20-39% 2 points
1-19% 1 point
(10 points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:


• Communication skills Rating Sheet
• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT (GAD) COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Position: _____________________ School/District/Area: _________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
above) signing
• CY 2021 and CY 2022
Point/s Earned ✓ Special Order/Memorandum issued
= (Average of the Three IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 20 as to coordinatorship or advisership
duly signed by authorities
(65 points)
the last 3 years from the cut-off date set by
the Division PRAISE committee.
Awardee in the Division – 3 points attached search criteria
Note:
• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points ✓ Copy of the Innovation documents
with the name of the Nominees
• Adopted in the district - 4 points duly approved by the SDS (for
c. For group/team research, point/s earned will be Regional Office nominees)
d. Points earned are cumulative but not to

3. Research and Development Projects

(5 points)
3.1Conducted basic/action research ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript of
approved by the DO Research Team the implemented / conducted
Research and Development Project
(3 points)
duly approved by the SDS
• Regional/Division Level - 3 points ✓ Certification from the SDO Research
• District Level - 2 points Committee on the scope of the
• School Level - 1 point Research Locale as to where it was
conducted
Note:
c. For group/team research, point/s earned will be
d. Points earned are cumulative but not to

• National - 1.75 points Letter
• Regional -1.50 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• Division - 1.25 points Certificate of Recognition as a
Research Presenter

divided by the
number of
authors ✓ Copy of the published
• Article published in a journal/ - 1 point per book/articles or
newspaper/ magazine of wide article but not developed/contextualized
circulation exceed 4 learning resources/IEC
points ✓ Certificate of Recognition
Of LRs / IEC
divided by the
number of writers
Reviewer, Language Editor not to exceed
Learning Resources
Note:
5. Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning

• International/ National - 5 points ✓ Certificate of

Consultant/Resource
• Division/Provincial - 3 points Speaker/Learning Facilitator/Trainer
• District/Municipal - 2 points signed by DepEd or other
• School/Barangay - 1 point agencies/organizations sanctioned
Note: by DepEd
6. Networking/Linkages (5 points)
✓ Initiated networking/partnership projects and/or
programs that will benefit the office ✓ Copy of the approved proposal (for
IGPs and other special
Points given to GAD-related networking programs/projects)
/partnership projects and/or programs ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or
Member - 2.5 points acceptance or any other valid proof
Points given to non-GAD-related attachments: Pictures, WFP/POW
networking/partnership projects and/or programs
Proponent/organizer - 3 points
Member - 1.5 points
Note:
a. For more than one proponent, points earned will be
7. Other Meritorious Accomplishments as to the

position/coordinatorship within the last 3
years from the cut-off date set by the
Regional PRAISE committee (35 points)
7.1 Functionality of GAD Focal Point System ✓ Minutes of Meetings
(GFPS) (10 points) ✓ Accomplished GAD Mainstreaming
Evaluation Framework (GMEF)
Number of meetings conducted within Point/s
the last 3 years from the cut-off date set Earned
4 8 points
3 6 points
7.2 Submission of GAD Plan and Budget (GPB)

(5 points)
✓ Submitted GAD Plan and Budget - 5 pts. ✓ Copy of the GAD Plan and Budget
(GPB) duly signed by the SDS
✓ Submitted GAD Plan and Budget - 4 pts.
✓ Submitted GAD Plan and Budget - 3 pts.

1 day before the deadline
✓ Submitted GAD Plan and Budget - 2 pts

on the deadline

7.3 Submission of GAD Accomplishment

Report (AR) (5 points)
✓ Submitted GAD Accomplishment - 5 pts.
Report 3 days before the deadline
✓ Copy of the GAD Accomplishment
✓ Submitted GAD Accomplishment - 4 pts. Report/s duly signed by the SDS
Report 2 days before the deadline
✓ Submitted GAD Accomplishment - 3 pts.

Report 1 day before the deadline
✓ Submitted GAD Accomplishment - 2 pts

Report on the deadline
7.4 Attributed Programs, Projects, and

Activities (PPAs) subjected to Harmonized
Gender and Development Guidelines (HGDG)
(5 points)
✓ Project Proposal/s duly approved by
No. of attributed Project Proposal/s Point/s
the SDS
Subjected to HGDG within the last 3 Earned
years from cut-0ff date set ✓ Accomplished HGDG form duly
At least 5 5 points signed by the authorities
4 3 points
3 1 point
7.5 Activities conducted that addressed

subjected Gender issues (10 points)
No. of activities conducted that Point/s

addressed gender issues within the Earned ✓ Activity Completion Report/s
last 3 years from cut-0ff date set
10 6 points
9 3 points

points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
b. Validity of the learning and development activities
• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT (SBM) COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
above) signing
• CY 2021 and CY 2022
(80 points)
theDivision PRAISE committee.
Awardee in the Division – 1 point
Note:
• Started the implementation - 2 points with the name of the Nominees
duly approved by the SDS (for
Note: Office nominees)
a. For group/team research, point/s earned ✓ Certificate/Certification signed by
will be divided by the number of researchers. the SDS (for division, district, and
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to school nominees) or RD (for
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. Regional Office nominees)
3.Research and Development Projects (3 points)

3.1Conducted basic/action research approved
by the DO Research Team (2 points) ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript of
• Regional/Division Level -2 the implemented / conducted
points duly approved by the SDS

Note: ✓ Certification from the SDO Research

a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be divided Committee on the scope of the
by the number of researchers. Research Locale as to where it was
b. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the conducted
3.2 Presented a research paper (1 point) ✓ Memorandum / Invitation

• Regional -0.50 points Certificate of Recognition as a

• Co-authorship of a book - 3 points will be book/articles or
divided by the developed/contextualized
number of learning resources/IEC
authors ✓ Certificate of Recognition
circulation exceed 4
points
Of LRs / IEC
divided by the
number of writers
Layout Artist, broadcaster/video 1 point
Learning Resources
Note:
✓ Certificate of
Facilitator (3 points) Consultant/Resource
• International - 3 points Speaker/Learning Facilitator/Trainer
signed by DepEd or other
agencies/organizations sanctioned
• Regional - 1 point by DepEd
Note:
6. Other Meritorious Accomplishments specific to ✓ Awards received and certificates or

the position (65 points) Plaque of recognition
6.1 SDOs Achievement and Awards (SBM related
project) on TA Provision (15 points)
Best Practice in TA Provision – 15 pts.

Effective Practice in TA Provision – 10 pts.
Innovative Practice in TA Provision – 5 pts

6.2 Meet the 100% Target of Schools SBM Level ✓ Consolidated SBM Assessment
II of Practice against to the total number of Results duly signed by the Division
(excluding Level III) schools (10 points) Validators and duly approved by the
100% of the total number of - 10 points Schools Division Superintendent
Schools (Elem. & Sec.)
95% - 99% of the total number - 8 points

of Schools (Elem. & Sec.)


Below 85% of the total number - 2 points

6.3 Meet the 50% Target of Schools SBM Level III ✓ Consolidated SBM Assessment
of Practice against to the total number of Results duly signed by the Division
SBM Level II schools (10 points) Validators and duly approved by the
50% of the total number of - 10 points
Schools Division Superintendent
SBM Level II Schools (Elem. & Sec.)
45%-49% of the total number - 8 points

of SBM Level II Schools (Elem. & Sec.)

of SBM Level II Schools(Elem. & Sec.)

Below 35% of the total number - 2 points

✓ Consolidated SBM Assessment
6.4 Meet the 100% Target of Schools SBM Level Results duly approved by the QAD
III of Practice region recognized against to Chief
the total number of SDOs` recommended
SBM Level III schools for regional validation
at least 10 recommended schools for
Provincial divisions and at least 5
recommended schools for City divisions
(15 points)
100% of the total no. of - 15 points

recommended Schools (Elem. & Sec.)
95% - 99% of the total - 12 points

number of recommended
schools (Elem. & Sec.)

number of recommended
School (Elem. & Sec)

number of schools (Elem. & Sec)
Below 85% of the total - 3 points

number of schools (Elem. & Sec.) ✓ Division Coaching Plan

Implementation Report with MOVs
6.5 SDO-SBM Coaching Plan Implementation (15
points)
90-100% of the SBM Coaching - 15 points
Plan has been implemented
80% - 89.99% of the SBM - 12 points

Coaching Plan has been implemented


At most 59% of the SBM - 3 points

points)
• Earned at least 18 Doctorate or - 2 points Certification of Units Earned
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor - 1.5points
Laws (Juris Doctor)
• Complete Academic Requirements - 1 point
• Earned at least 18 MA Units - 0.5 point
• Regional - 1 point
Note:
shall be within the last 3 years from the cut-off date set
by the Division PRAISE committee.
• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA) COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
above) signing
• CY 2021 and CY 2022
(80 points)
Awardee in the Division – 1 point
Note:
• Started the implementation - 3 points with the name of the Nominees
duly approved by the SDS (for
Note: Office nominees)
e. For group/team research, point/s earned will be ✓ Certificate/Certification signed by
divided by the number of researchers. the SDS (for division, district, and
f. Points earned are cumulative but not to school nominees) or RD (for
exceed the allotted points for the criterion. Regional Office nominees)
3. Research and Development Projects (2

points)
3.1Conducted basic/action research approved ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript of
by the DO Research Team (1 point) the implemented / conducted
• Regional/Division Level -1 duly approved by the SDS

point ✓ Certification from the SDO Research

Note:
Committee on the scope of the
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be divided Research Locale as to where it was
3.2 Presented a research paper (1 point) Letter
• Regional -0.50 points Research Presenter

• Co-authorship of a book - 3 points will be developed/contextualized
divided by the learning resources/IEC
number of ✓ Certificate of Recognition
authors
points
of LRs / IEC
divided by the
number of writers
Layout Artist, broadcaster/video 1 point
Learning Resources
Note:
allotted points for the criterion. ✓ Certificate of
5.Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning Consultant/Resource
Facilitator (3 points) Speaker/Learning Facilitator/Trainer
signed by DepEd or other
• National - 2 points by DepEd
Note:

6.1 SDOs Achievement and Awards on TA ✓ Awards received and certificates or
Provision (15 points)
Plaque of recognition
Best Practice in TA Provision – 15 pts.
Effective Practice in TA Provision – 12 pts.

Innovative Practice in TA Provision – 9 pts.

Ordinary Practice in TA Provision – 6 pts. ✓ ACR on the Orientation of the
DFTACTs on CTAM
6.2 Conducted Orientation on TA Mechanism
thru the Orientation of the Contextualized
TA Mechanism to the DFTACTs (5 points)
100% of the new members of the - 5 points
DFTACTs were oriented
95% - 99% of the new members - 4 points

of the DFTACTs were oriented
90% - 94% of the new members - 3 points

85% - 89% of the new members -2 points

Below 85% of the new members - 1 point

6.3 SDO Technical Assistance Plan

Implementation (15 points) ✓ 2021 Division TA Plan
90 -100% of the SDO TA Plan - 15 points Implementation Report with MOVs
has been implemented
80% -89.99% of the SDO TA Plan - 12 points

70% -79.99% of the SDO TA Plan - 9 points

60% - 69.99% of the SDO TA Plan - 6 points

At most 59% of the SDO TA Plan - 3 points

has been implemented ✓ DFTACTs’ Deployment Reports
✓ DFTACTs’ Deployment Log
6.4 Percentage of Priority Schools Provided TA
by the DFTACTs (10 points)
✓ DTAPP and DTAPE
100% of the priority schools have - 10 points
been provided TA by the DFTACTs
per quarter
95% - 99% of the priority schools - 8 points

have been provided TA by the DFTACTs
per quarter

per quarter

per quarter
Below 85% of the priority schools - 2 points

per quarter
✓ Improved Performance Indicators for
6.5 The Coordinator’s TA Practices to the
DFTACTs has demonstrated significant SY 2019- 2020 and 2020-2021 (NER,

change/improvement of the Schools CSR, CR) of the Schools Division

Division’s Net Enrolment, Cohort Survival, from PPRD
and Completion Rates (17 points)
100% NER, CSR and CRs achieved - 17 points
by the SDO
95% - 99% NER, CSR and CRs achieved - 14 points

by the SDO

by the SDO

by the SDO
Below 85% NER, CSR and CRs achieved - 5 points

by the SDO

points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:
• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION SPED COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
above) signing
• CY 2021 and CY 2022
(50 points)
• Nomination in the Region/ ✓ Memorandum / Advisory with
• Nomination in the Division /
Note:
2.Innovation (5 points) ✓ Copy of the Innovation documents

• Adopted in the region/division - 5 points with the name of the Nominees
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will Regional Office nominees)

3. Research and Development Projects (5 ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript of

points) the implemented / conducted
3.1Conducted basic/action research approved Research and Development Project
by the DO Research Team (3 points) duly approved by the SDS
• Regional/Division Level -3 ✓ Certification from the SDO Research
points Committee on the scope of the
• District Level -2 Research Locale as to where it was
points conducted
Note:
a. For group/team research, point/s earned will be divided
by the number of researchers.
• Regional -1.50 points Research Presenter
4.Publication / Authorship (5 points) book/articles or
• Sole authorship of a book - 5 points developed/contextualized
• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will be learning resources/IEC
divided by the ✓ Certificate of Recognition
number of
authors
points
of LRs / IEC
divided by the
number of writers
Learning Resources
Note:
✓ Certificate of
• Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed the
allotted points for the criterion. Consultant/Resource
Speaker/Learning Facilitator/Trainer
5.Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning signed by DepEd or other
by DepEd

Note:
the allotted points for the criterion. ✓ Copy of the approved proposal
✓ Narrative/Accomplishment report
6.Outreach Activity (5 points) (depicting the extent to which the
✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based activity has effectively and efficiently
feeding program, medical/dental missions, tree addressed a pressing need or
planting, clean-up drives, and other community
improved service delivery/learning
development activities or civic engagements
outcome) with attachments:
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points Pictorial, written output, video,
✓ Co-Organizer - 3 points ✓ Certificate of Recognition/
✓ Member - 1 point Participation
Note:
a. Points earned are cumulative but not to exceed ✓ Copy of the approved proposal (for
the allotted points for the criterion. IGPs and other special
programs/projects)
7.Networking/Linkages (5 points) ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or MOUs,
✓ Initiated resource generation projects and/or
deed of donation/ acceptance or any
programs that will benefit the office/school
other valid proof
Proponent/organizer - 5 points ✓ Accomplishment report w/
Member - 2.5 points attachments: Pictures, WFP/POW
Note:
be divided by the number of proponents
8. Other Meritorious Accomplishments ✓ Certification from the SDS

Specific to the Position (15 points)
8.1 Instructional Material/LR Development
and Management (5 points)
Number of LR Development/QA Activities

Conducted
5 or more activities – 5 points

4 activities - 4 points
1 activity - 1 point
8.2 Provision of Technical Assistance (5 ✓ Photos

points) ✓ TA plan/report
Gave TA to 81%-100% of school – 5 points ✓ Certificate of
heads appreciation/recognition
Gave TA to 61%-80% of school - 4 points
heads
heads
heads
Gave TA to 1%-20% of school - 1 point
Heads

8.3 Efficiency in the Utilization of Funds (5

✓ Certification from the Finance
points)
Division (FD)
Percentage of Utilization
of the downloaded PSF or Point/s Earned
allotted fund for SPED
100% 5 points
95% - 99% 4 points
90% - 94% 3 points
80% - 89% 2 points
70% - 79% 1 point1

(10 points)
• Master’s Degree / Bachelor - 3.5 points
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:

• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION SPORTS COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
above) signing
• CY 2021 and CY 2022
(65 points)
Note:

• Conceptualized - 2 points Office nominees)

3. Research and Development Projects (10 ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript of

points) the implemented / conducted
3.1Conducted basic/action research approved Research and Development Project
by the DO Research Team (5 points) duly approved by the SDS
• Regional/Division Level -5 ✓ Certification from the SDO Research
points Committee on the scope of the
• District Level -4 Research Locale as to where it was
points conducted
Note:
• International -5 points ✓ Certificate of Appreciation /
• National - 4 points Certificate of Recognition as a
• Regional - 3 points Research Presenter

• Co-authorship of a book - 5 points will be developed/contextualized
divided by the learning resources/IEC
number of ✓ Certificate of Recognition
authors
points
divided by the
number of writers
Learning Resources
Note:
✓ Certificate of
5.Consultant/Resource Speaker/Learning Recognition/Appreciation as
Facilitator (5 points) Consultant/Resource
Speaker/Learning Facilitator/Trainer
• International/National -5 points signed by DepEd or other
• Regional -4 points agencies/organizations sanctioned
• Division/Provincial -3 points by DepEd
• District/Municipal -2 points

Note:
✓ Copy of the approved proposal (for
IGPs and other special
programs/projects)
Initiated resource generation projects and/or
programs that will benefit the office/school ✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or MOUs,
deed of donation/ acceptance or any
Proponent/organizer - 5 points other valid proof
Co-chair - 4 points ✓ Accomplishment report w/
Member - 3 points attachments: Pictures, WFP/POW
Note:
✓ Narrative/Accomplishment report
(depicting the extent to which the
7. Other Meritorious Accomplishments activity has effectively and efficiently
Specific to the Position (30 points) addressed a pressing need or
7.1 Conduct of Professional Development
Programs (10 points) improved service delivery /learning
Conducted professional development outcome) with attachments:
program/activity that addressed the needs of the Pictorial, written output, video,
teachers /school heads related to the PAPs ✓ Certificate of Recognition/
supervised/coordinated specifically on sports
Participation
✓ Proponent/organizer: ✓ Memorandum for the conduct of the
4 to 5 development programs - 10 points program/activity
2 to 3 development programs - 8 points
1 development program - 6 points
✓ Member:
1 development program - 2 points
Note:
the allotted points for the criterion ✓ Certificate of Recognition
✓ Memorandum (reflecting the
7.2 Won in National and Regional sports members of the Team and Officials)
competition (10 points) ✓ Summary of EVRAA Results or any
(Note: Number of golds, silver, bronze medals for
similar Official Results from the
both individual and team sports prevail for the
national level and rank for the regional level) Record Committee duly signed by
the authorized officials/Issuance
National Level (reflecting the winners with medals
5 to 10 gold medals – 10 points garnered or ranking)
1 to 4 gold medals - 8 points
5 to 10 silver medals - 6 points
1 to 4 silver medals - 5 points
5 to 10 bronze medals - 4 points
1 to 4 bronze medals - 3 points
Regional Level
Rank 1 – 5 points
Rank 2 to 3 – 4 points

Rank 8 to 10 – 1point
Note:
Otherwise, points earned are cumulative
✓ Memorandum ✓ Certificate of
7.3 Facilitated/TWG on the Participation of Recognition/Participation
the coaches and or officiating officials to the
national and regional virtual/F2F sports
trainings/seminars conducted (5 pts.)
✓ Number of Sports events facilitated in the

participation to the national level:
1 to 5 events facilitated the - 5 points

participation to the national level

participation to the regional level:
1 to 5 regional sports events – 4 points

facilitated

participation to the division level:
1 to 5 regional sports events – 3 points

facilitated

points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)
Note:


• Alertness
• Judgment


DIVISION MULTIGRADE COORDINATOR
Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
(MOVs) Earned
above) signing
• CY 2021 and CY 2022
= (Average of the Two IPCRF Ratings / 5) x 25 as to coordinatorship or advisership
(60 points)
Note:


3. Research and Development Projects (10

points) ✓ Copy of the complete manuscript of
3.1Conducted basic/action research approved the implemented / conducted
by the DO Research Team (5 points) Research and Development Project
• Regional/Division Level - 5 points duly approved by the SDS
• District Level - 4 points ✓ Certification from the SDO Research
• School Level - 3 points Committee on the scope of the
Research Locale as to where it was
conducted
Note:

• International -5 points
• National - 4 points ✓ Memorandum / Invitation
• Regional - 3 points Letter
Research Presenter
divided by the ✓ Copy of the published
number of book/articles or
authors developed/contextualized
points
of LRs / IEC
divided by the
number of writers
Learning Resources
Note:
✓ Certificate of
• International/National -5 points Consultant/Resource
• Regional -4 points Speaker/Learning Facilitator/Trainer
• Division/Provincial -3 points signed by DepEd or other
• District/Municipal -2 points
by DepEd
Note:


6.Outreach Activity (5 points) ✓ Copy of the approved proposal

✓ Sponsored/conducted community-based ✓ Narrative/Accomplishment report
feeding program, medical/dental missions, tree (depicting the extent to which the
planting, clean-up drives, and other community activity has effectively and efficiently
development activities or civic engagements addressed a pressing need or
✓ Proponent/organizer - 5 points improved service delivery/learning
outcome) with attachments:
✓ Member - 2.5 points Pictorial, written output, video
✓ Certificate of
Note: Recognition/Participation
7.Networking/Linkages (10 points) ✓ Copy of the approved proposal (for

Initiated resource generation projects and/or IGPs and other special
programs that will benefit the office/school programs/projects)
✓ Copy of Partnership MOAs or MOUs,
Proponent/organizer - 10 points deed of donation/ acceptance or any
Member - 5 points
other valid proof
a. For more than one proponent, point/s earned will attachments: Pictures, WFP/POW
8. Other Meritorious Accomplishments

✓ M & E Report
Specific to the Position
8.1 Monitoring, Supervision and Provision of ✓ TA Plan
Technical Assistance to MG schools/School ✓ TA Report
Heads as reflected in the TA Plan (10 points)
Percentage of Schools monitored,

Earned
supervised, and provided TA as
Point/s
reflected in the TA Plan
90% - 100% 10 points
80% - 89% 8 points
70% - 79% 6 points
60% - 69% 4 points

points)
Laws (Juris Doctor)


Note:
• Alertness
• Judgment

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING DRRM SCHOOL

(ELEMENTARY/JHS/STAND-ALONE/SHS)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
Conduct school activities that are beyond the roles
and responsibilities, and KRAs of the personnel, ✓ Activity Design with
particularly on DRRM/CCAMs/EiEs involving the approved signature
learners, personnel, and community stakeholders of the School Head.
✓ Activity Completion
(50 points) Report (ACR) with
pictorials, attendance
5 points for every activity with complete MOVs sheet, and with the
3 points for every activity with one lacking MOV approved signature by
1 point for every activity with two or more lacking MOVs the School Head.
0 if the MOVs have no signature of the School Head
Compliance with DRRM reports, requests, and ✓ Conducted quarterly

mandates by the Schools Division Office of Leyte on Multi-hazard drills
applicable to the Schools
school safety (30 points)
identified hazards.
✓ Conducted Capacity
2 points for every indicator supported with MOVs Building activities on
together with school head certification that the activity DRRM/CCAM/ EiE
was prepared or conducted. involving learners,
personnel, community
1 point for every indicator supported with MOVs stakeholders.
together without the certification of the school head. ✓ Maintained,
disseminated, and posted
relevant and updated
emerging hotlines and
disaster measures and
plans in strategic
locations throughout the
school.
✓ Established and operate
early warning system. (ex.
bulletin board, sirens,
bells, etc.)
✓ Integrated DRRM and
CCAM in regular school
programs and activities
and in the School
Improvement Plan.
✓ Create and or update the
School DRRM Plan which
contains
Prevention/Mitigation,

Preparedness, Response,
Recovery.
✓ Created and or updated

the School DRRM
Contingency Plan which
must include a Student-
Family Reunification
Plan.
✓ Formed and sustained

linkages with
community
stakeholders and local
authorities
✓ Conducted an Annual
Risk Assessment
through the Student-
Led watching and
hazard mapping.
✓ Prepared an
evacuation/exit plan
and post directional
signage on every floor
of the building
✓ Equipped school with

first aid kits and other
necessary
supplies/materials in
case of emergencies.
Ensure that these items
are accessible and can
easily be located.
✓ Identified evacuations
areas and classrooms
that may be used as
temporary shelters
during disasters and
emergencies
✓ Identified alternative
sources and/or
maintain supply of

drinking water in the

school.
✓ Facilitated the
assessment of school
building structure and
electrical wiring
and make necessary

repairs and/ or
upgrades to prevent
unnecessary incidents.
✓ Installed appropriate
and available fire
suppression and
ensure that corridors
and pathways are
unobstructed and all
sharp, protruding
objects which may
cause harm to learners
are removed.
Involvement or participation in DRRM/CCAMs/EiEs

programs, activities, and projects at the School, ✓ Authenticated
District, Division, Regional, National, and or Certificate, Certificate of
international level. Appearance
(20 points)
Points for every involvement or participation:

International level – 10 points
National level - 8 points
Regional – 6 points
Division – 4 points
District – 2 points
School – 1 point
To be multiplied by the number of his/her attendance.

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING DRRM SCHOOL COORDINATOR

(SCHOOL HEAD)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
MEANS OF Points
CRITERIA/INDICATORS
Compliance with required reports, requests, and
mandates by the Schools Division Office of Leyte
particularly on DRRM/CCAMs/EiEs. (50 points)
50 reports submitted 5 days before the deadline ✓ 100% of schools in

45 reports submitted on the deadline his/her AOR submitted
40 reports submitted 5 days after the deadline the reports
36 reports submitted 10 days after the deadline



Initiated District DRRM, CCAMs, and EiEs programs,

activities, and projects (30 points) ✓ Monitored the quarterly
Multi-hazard drills
2 points for every indicator supported with MOVS including NSED
together with School Head certification that the ✓ Monitored Capacity
activity was prepared or conducted Building activites on
DRRMS/CCAM/EiE
1 point for every indicator supported with MOVS involving learners,
together without the certification of the School Head personnel, community
stakeholders within the
district.
✓ Disseminated relevant
and updated emerging
hotlines and disaster
measures and plans in
the district.
✓ Established and
disseminated early
warning system. (ex.

bulletin board, sirens,

bells, etc.)
✓ Monitored in the
integrated DRRM and
CCAM in regular school
programs and activities
and in the School
Improvement Plan
✓ Conducted roll out or

provided technical
assistance (TA) on the
School DRRM Plan
which contains
Prevention/Mitigation,
Preparedness,
Response, Recovery.
✓ Conducted roll out or

provided technical
assistance (TA) on the
School DRRM
Contingency Plan which
must include a Student-
Family Reunification
Plan.
✓ Maintained and
sustained linkages with
community
stakeholders and local
authorities in the district
on DRRM partnership.
✓ Monitored on the
Conduct of Schools
Annual Risk Assessment
through the
Student-Led watching
and hazard mapping.
✓ Monitored an
evacuation/exit plan
and post directional
signage on every floor
of the building to
schools in the district
✓ Monitored the
availability of first aid
kits and other necessary
supplies/materials in
case of emergencies in
all schools. Ensure that
these items are

accessible and can

easily be located.
✓ Monitored the
evacuations areas and
classrooms that may be
used as temporary
shelters during disasters
and emergencies .
✓ Monitored the
alternative sources
and/or maintain supply
of drinking water of all
the schools in the
district.
✓ Monitored the conduct
on the assessment of
school building
structure and electrical
wiring and make
necessary repairs and/
or upgrades to prevent
unnecessary incidents.
✓ Monitored the
appropriate and
available fire
suppression and ensure
that corridors and
pathways are
unobstructed and all
sharp, protruding
objects which may
cause harm to learners
are removed.
Involvement or participation in DRRM/CCAMs/EiEs programs,
activities, and projects at the School, District, Division, Regional, ✓ Authenticated
National, and or international level. Certificate, Certificate of
(20 points) Appearance
Points for every involvement or participation:

International level – 10 points
National level - 8 points
Regional – 6 points
Division – 4 points
District – 2 points
School – 1 point
To be multiplied by the number of his/her attendance.


(BKD COORDINATOR/ADVISER)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA MAXIMUM PARTICIPANT’S

RATING POINTS
1. Assistance extended to BKD Officers 30%
1.1 Technical assistance for the BKD
Officers on the implementation of the 20%
PPAs
1.2 Supervision to the BKD Officers to
Accomplish the Pre and Post Activity 10%
Documents
2. NETWORKING, LINKAGES AND COLLABORATION 30%
2.1 Involvement in Outreach, extension
20%
programs/activities
Involvement in Community/Civic Organization 10%
3. OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS 40%
3.1 Trainings/Seminar/Workshop Related
15%
to Drug Abuse Prevention Advocacy
3.2 Awards and Recognitions Related to
20%
Drug Abuse Prevention Advocacy
3.3 Educational Attainment and Professional
Growth
a. Doctorate Degree (5)
b. Completed Academic
Requirements for Doctoral Degree (4) 5%
c. Master’s Degree (3)
d. Completed Academic Requirements
e. For Master’s Degree (2)
f. Baccalaureate Degree (1)
TOTAL 100%
______________________________________________________
Signature over Printed Name of the Evaluator/Date


(SPG COORDINATOR/ADVISER)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA MAXIMUM PARTICIPANT’S POINTS

POINTS
1. EXCELLENCE IN STUDENT/PUPIL 30
GOVERNANCE
1.1. Organizational Leadership 15
a. Implementation of all mandated PPAs 10
b. Governance – 5 points 5
(Refer to DO 47 s. 2014)
1. General Plan of Action

2. Resolutions
3. Minutes of the Meeting
4. Financial Reports
5. Activity Completion /Evaluation Reports
6. List of School Clubs/Organizations
7. Project Proposals
8. Communication Letters
9. Accomplishment Report
10. Election Reports
1.2. Networking, Linkages and Collaboration 10
a. Involvement in community/civic/organizations/ 5
associations
b. Involvement in outreach/extension 5
programs/activities
Outreach/Extension programs/activities
initiated where nominee served as:
Proponent/Chair = 5.00
Member = 4.00
1.3. Experience 5
The candidate has been SPG/SSG adviser for at
least two (2) terms
2. EMBODIMENT OF DEPED CORE VALUES 40
2.1 Maka-Diyos 10
Upholds/Respects beliefs and faith
Manifests moral standard
Right conduct, Honesty, Involvement in
religious/spiritual activities
2.2 Makatao 10
Charity/Kindness
Empathy and Sympathy
Compassion
Human Dignity and Equality
Multi-culturalism


(SSG COORDINATOR/ADVISER)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________

POINTS
1. EXCELLENCE IN STUDENT/PUPIL 30
GOVERNANCE
1.1. Organizational Leadership 15
a. Implementation of all mandated PPAs 10
b. Governance – 5 points 5
(Refer to DO 47 s. 2014)
11. General Plan of Action

12. Resolutions
13. Minutes of the Meeting
15. Activity Completion /Evaluation Reports
16. List of School Clubs/Organizations
17. Project Proposals
18. Communication Letters
19. Accomplishment Report
20. Election Reports
1.2. Networking, Linkages and Collaboration 10
a. Involvement in community/civic/organizations/ 5
associations
b. Involvement in outreach/extension 5
programs/activities
Outreach/Extension programs/activities
initiated where nominee served as:
Proponent/Chair = 5.00
Member = 4.00
1.3. Experience 5
The candidate has been SPG/SSG adviser for at
least two (2) terms
2. EMBODIMENT OF DEPED CORE VALUES 40
2.1 Maka-Diyos 10
Upholds/Respects beliefs and faith
Manifests moral standard
Right conduct, Honesty, Involvement in
religious/spiritual activities
2.2 Makatao 10
Charity/Kindness
Empathy and Sympathy
Compassion
Human Dignity and Equality
Multi-culturalism


POINTS
2.3 Makakalikasan 10
Cleanliness and Orderliness
Proper Waste Management
Energy Conservation
Environmental Protection and Preservation
Wise use of resources
2.4 Makabansa 10
Takes pride in being a Filipino
Resiliency in times of need/crisis
Obedience to existing rules and regulations
Community Service Involvement
Promotes and patronizes local products, services
and practices
3. OUTSTANDING ACCOMPLISHMENTS 30
3.1. Trainings/Seminars/Workshops Related to 5
School Governance and Leadership Advocacy
3.2. Awards and Recognitions Related to School 5
Governance and Leadership Advocacy
3.3 Leadership Initiative and Advocacy 15
3.3.1 Flagship/Innovative Program or Project (10
points)
3.3.2 Resource Speakership related to School
Governance and Leadership Advocacy (5 points)
3.4 Educational Attainment and Professional 5
Growth
Doctorate Degree (5 points)
Doctorate Degree CAR (4)
Master’s Degree (3 points)
Master’s Degree CAR (2 points)
At least 18 earned MA units (1 point)
TOTAL 100
______________________________________________________


YOUTH FOR ENVIRONMENT IN SCHOOLS ORGANIZATION
(-YES-O TEACHER ADVISER ELEMENTARY/SECONDARY)

School Head: _________________________________________________________________________
Criteria/Indicators Means of Verification Points

MOVs Earned
(For Elementary & Secondary YES-O Teacher Adviser)
Assistance to YES-O – 40 points
Provision of Technical Assistance to YES-O officers to Photos of meeting/activities with the
effectively implement all mandated Programs, Projects and officers, Attendance Sheet, Minutes
Activities (PPAs) (20 points) of Meeting,
Supervision to YES-O student officers to accomplish the
following(20 points):
1. Calendar of Annual Proposed Activities (CAPA) Copies of the duly
2. Division Certificate of Registration accomplished/signed documents
3. Registration Form
4. Membership Forms
5. Accomplishment Report (AAR)
6. Activity Completion Reports
7. Five-Year Targets
*1-3 accomplished documents – 10 points

Networking, Linkages and Collaboration – 30 points
Involvement in community/civic/ organizations/ Photo documentation,
associations (10 points) communication letter, cert of
appearance
Involvement in outreach/ extension programs/ activities
(Outreach/ Extension programs/ activities initiated where *Copy of duly signed/approved
nominee served as (10 points): proposal
**Copy of Special Order/Office Order or
*Proponent/ Chair = 2.00 related documents as proof
**Member = 1.00 *** Attendance Sheet, Certificate of
***Volunteer = 1.00 Appearance
Participation to any trainings, webinars and workshops Copy of Certificate of Participation/
offered by DepEd and private sector related to Environment Screen Shot of Online Evaluation
Protection and Youth Engagement (10 points) submitted and such other proof of
attendance
Embodiment the core value “Maka-Kalikasan” – 30 points
1. Practicing 3Rs (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle) at home (5) 1.
2. Lead the environmental protection and Activity Proposal 2
preservation in the community (5) Activity Completion Report
3. Advocated the practice of not using Photo Documentation of Activity 3
single-used plastic at home (5) Certificate of Appearance
4. Energy, Water and Power Supply Conservation (5) Certificate of Participation 4
5. Practicing vegetable gardening at home (5) Communication Letter
5
6. Lead outreach programs in the community 6
(e.g. clean-up drive, tree planting) (5)
TOTAL 100points
______________________________________________________

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING EMIS COORDINATOR

(ELEMENTARY/SECONDARY)

School Head: ________________________________________________________________________
I. LEADERSHIP POTENTIAL 45 points

A.1. Experience/Served as EMIS Coordinator with Special Order (5 pts)
15 yrs and above 5 pts

11-14 yrs 4 pts
7-10 yrs 3 pts
4-6 yrs 2 pts
2-3 yrs 1
pt
A. 2. Attended related training on LIS/EBEIS for SY 2020-2021 (5 pts)
Regional Level 5 pts
Division Level 4 pts
Area Level .... 3 pts
District Level 2 pts
School Level 1 pt
A.3. Involvement in the School/District, Area, Division LIS/EBEIS Training (5 pts)
Speaker/Trainer 5 pts
Facilitator 3 pts
Support Staff 1 pt
A.4. Submitted Monthly Report (SF4) (10 pts)
Submitted on or before due 10 pts

Submitted after due 5 pts
A.5. Submitted school/district LIS and EBEIS (BOSY 2020-2021) without
reversion (5 pts)
100% of the class/schools(district) submitted on time 5 pts
90-99% 4 pts
80-89 % 3 pts
70-79% 2 pts
60% and below of the schools/districts
A. 6. Submitted school/district LIS and EBEIS (EOSY 2020-2021) without
reversion (10 pts)
100% of the class/schools(district) submitted on time 10 pts
90-99% 8 pts
80-89% 6 pts
70-79% 4 pts
60% and below of the schools/districts 2 pts
A. 7. Submitted Report on Promotion (10 pts)
Submitted on or before due 5 pts
Submitted after due 3 pts

II. OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE 10 points

B.1. Performance Rating for the last school year 2020-2021 (5 pts)
4.500- 5.000 OUTSTANDING 10
3.500-4.499 VERV SATISFACTORY 8
2.500-3.499 SATISFACTORY 6
1.500-2.499 UNSATISFACTORY 4
Below 1.499 POOR 2
B.2. Outstanding Award Received 5 pts)

National Level 5 pts
Regional Level 4pts
Division Level 3 pts
Area Level 2 pts
District/School Level 1 pt
III. PHYSICAL RECORDS & MANAGEMENT 10 points

C.1 Has a well-structured District/School EMIS Office with the presence of the following (5 pts)
• Display board showing the Schools Performance Indicators

(Retention Rate, Completion Rate, Transition rate, drop-out rate, enrollment)
• Comparison results of the District/School Test and NAT per academic subject area
• Filing cabinet or its equivalent (Form 137 properly filed)
Presence of all 3 items w/ complete indicators for the last 5 yrs 10 pts
Presence of all 3 items w/ indicators for the last 4 yrs 8 pts
Presence of all 3 items w/ indicators for the last 3 yrs 6 pts
Presence of 2 items w/ indicators for the last 3 yrs 4 pts
Presence of 1 item w/ indicators for the last 3 yrs 2 pts
IV. BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 30 points

SCALE DEFINITION
5 Role Model
4 Consistently demonstrates
3 Most of the time demonstrates
2 Sometimes demonstrates
1 Rarely demonstrates
IV. 1 Self-Management (5 pts)

INDICATORS POINTS SCORE
Sets personal goals and direct ion , needs and development 1 2 3 4 5
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and
purposive and takes into account personal goals and values
congruent to that of the organization 1 2 3 4 5
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged 1 2 3 4 5
Total score divide by the no. of indicator/s =average

IV. 2. Professionalism and Ethics (5 pts)

Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of
Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 1 2 3 4 5
6713)
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into
account the impact of his/her action, and decisions.
1 2 3 4 5
Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of
1 2 3 4 5
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs. 1 2 3 4 5
Acts with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the
organization’s needs, 1 2 3 4 5
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
IV. 3. Result-Focus (5 pts)

Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the
time 1 2 3 4 5
Avoids rework, mistakes and w a s t a g e through effective work

methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs
1 2 3 4 5
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to
standard operating procedures correctly and consistently.
Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work in terms of 1 2 3 4 5
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required
IV. 4. Teamwork (5 pts)

Willingly does his/her share of responsibility 1 2 3 4 5
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
accomplishment across the organization
1 2 3 4 5
Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions 1 2 3 4 5
Works constructively and collaboratively with others across organizations to
accomplish organizational goals and objectives 1 2 3 4 5
IV. 5. Service Orientation (5 pts)

Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues, and
problems 1 2 3 4 5
Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting

customer service issues and concerns
1 2 3 4 5
Develops and a d o pt s service improvement programs through
simplified procedures that will further enhance service delivery 1 2 3 4 5

IV. 6. Innovation (5 pts)

Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solution.
Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests better way to do things 1 2 3 4 5
(cost and/or operational efficiency).
Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box”. Continuously
focuses on improving personal productivity to create higher value
and results. 1 2 3 4 5
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop
original ideas or solutions. 1 2 3 4 5
Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates
1 2 3 4 5
resourcefulness and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
Total Score for behavioral competencies-------
IV. PUNCTUALITY / ATTENDANCE ______________________________________ (5 pts)
No absences in a year (excluding special leave and force leave) 5 pts

1-3 absences in a year (excluding special leave and force leave) 3 pts
4-5 absences in a year (excluding special leave and force leave) 1 pt
SUMMARY OF POINTS
COMPONENTS TOTAL POINTS
I. Leadership (45 pts)
II. Outstanding Performance (l0 pts)
Ill. Physical Records and Management (10 pts)
IV. Behavioral Competencies (30 pts)
V. Punctuality/Attendance (5 pts)
Total points(100 pts)
Evaluated & Validated by:
______________________ ____________________________ ______________________

Member Member Member
__________________________
Chairperson


(ICT COORDINATOR)

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
Description Maximum Given

Points Points
1. Technology Infrastructure
- DepEd Computerization Program (DCP) 20

Number of Working Computers over the Number of
Computers received by the school over the past 5
Years
80% - 100% (20 pts)
60% to less than 80% (16 pts)
Less than 20% (4 pts)
None (0 pts)
- Internet Connectivity in the School monthly paid by the 10

School under the School MOOE, PTA, LGU Funded
(Speed should be measured using ProjectBass.org App)
20 Mbps or more (10 pts)

10 Mbps to less than 20 Mbps (8 pts)
Less than 1 Mbps (2 pts)
None (0 pts)
2. Solutions Development
- Active DepEd Email Account of Teachers with proof of 5

last login within the past 3 months)
100% Accounts are active (5 pts)

90% to less than 100% Accounts are active (4 pts)
Less than 60% Accounts are active (1 pts)
- Active Office 365 Account of Teachers with proof of 5

- Active DepEd Email Account of Students with proof of 5



- Active Office 365 Account of Students with proof of 5


- Active DepEd Commons Account of Teachers with proof 5

of last login within the past 3 months)

- Active DepEd Commons Account of Students with proof 5

of last login within the past 3 months)

3. User Support
- Active LIS Account of Class Advisers with proof of 5


- Active LRMDS Account of Teachers with proof of 5


- Number of Teachers with Certificate of Completion for 5

the PNPKI in DepEd LMS with proof of completion
100% of Teachers completed (5 pts)

90% to less than 100% of Teachers Completed (4 pts)
Less than 60% of Teachers Completed (1 pts)
4. Educational Technology
- Active Minecraft Education Edition activity of students 5

with proof of last activity within the past month)

- Number of Teachers with Certificate of Completion for 5

the VINSET 2021 with proof of completion
100% of Teachers completed (5 pts)

Less than 60% of Teachers Completed (1 pts)
- Number of ICT-related Training conducted in School / 5

District in Support of the Distance Learning Modality
has been conducted for the past two years
More than 5 Trainings conducted (5 pts)

4 Trainings conducted (4 pts)
1 Training conducted (1 pt)
None (0 pt)
5. Documentation ( 2 points will be given for every proof of existence)
[ ] Inclusion of DCP Maintenance in the School AIP and SIP

[ ] Compilation of DCP Reports Submitted to bit.ly/leytedcpreport 2
[ ] Compilation of ICT-related Issuances from DepEd Central Office, 2
Regional Office, and Division Office
[ ] Special Order as School ICT Coordinator 2
[ ] Innovative Use of ICT in Teaching and Learning and or Education
Governance 2
2
TOTAL 100

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING READING COORDINATOR


Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
DIRECTION: Please give the appropriate rating corresponding to the rubrics set of every
criterion.
CRITERIA DESCRIPTION POINTS RATING
(10)
I. LEADERSHIP 1.1 Experience/Served as Reading
POTENTIAL Coordinator with Special Order
(25pts.)
2-5 years 2
6-9 years 4
10-13 years 6
14-17 years 8
8 years & above 10
1.2 Attended DepEd Sponsored (5)
training
District/School Level 1
Area Level 2
Division Level 3
Regional Level 4
National Level 5
1.3 Involvement in Training (5)
Programs/ Pedagogies in
Teaching Reading
Support Staff 2
Facilitator 3
Speaker/Trainer 5
1.4 Involvement in the Validation (5)
& Evaluation of Contextualized
LRs in English/Mother Tongue
Area Level 2
Division Level 3
Regional Level 4
National Level 5
II. OUTSTANDING 2.1 Average Performance Rating (10)
PERFORMANCE for the Last three (3) school year
(50pts.)
4.500-5.000 Outstanding 10
Very 5
3.500-4.499
Satisfactory
2.2 Winner Coach in Reading
Contests for the last five (5) years
a. District Level (3)
First Place 3
Second Place 2
Third Place 1
b. Area Level (5)
First Place 5
Second Place 3

Third Place 2
c. Division Level (10)

First Place 10
Second Place 8
Third Place 4
d. Regional Level (12)
First Place 12
Second Place 8
Third Place 4
2.3 Outstanding Awards in (10)
Reading Received
a. National Level 10
b. Regional Level 8
c. Division Level 6
d. Area Level 4
e. District/School 2
III. PHYSICAL & 3.1 Systematic filing of Records in (10)
RECORDS Reading (Activities/ Contests
MANAGEMENT conducted in the school or district
(15 pts.) approved by the School Head,
PSDS, EPS,ASDS, SDS for the last
three years)
• Copies of Approved
Action Plans
• Activity Completion
Reports
• Program of Activities
• Approved Activity
Proposals
• Minutes of the Meetings
Presence of 5 10
Presence of 4 8
Presence of 3 6
Presence of 3 4
Presence of 1 2
3.2 Complete Records of (5)
expenses incurred in the conduct
of the activity
• Liquidation Reports 1
• Minutes of Planning 1
Conference
• Memorandum/s 1
• Attendance Sheets 1
• Documentation 1
IV. BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES (5pts.)
SCALE DEFINITION
5 Role Model

IV.1 Self-Management (5) POINTS SCORE
INDICATORS 1 2 3 4 5
Sets personal goals & direction, needs &
development.
Undertakes personal actions and
behaviors that are clear and purposive &
takes into account personal goals and
values congruent to that of the
organization.
Displays emotional maturity and
enthusiasm for and is challenged by
higher goals.
Total Score divided by the number of indicators equals average score= _________
IV.2 Professionalism & Ethics (5) POINTS
INDICATORS 1 2 3 4 5 SCORE
Demonstrates the values and behavior
enshrined in the Norms of Conduct &
Ethical Standards for Public Officials &
Employees (RA 6713)
Practices ethical and professional
behavior and conduct taking into
account the impact of his/her action and
decision.
Maintains a professional image:
* Being trustworthy
* Regularity of attendance & punctuality
* Good grooming
* Communication
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the
organization’s needs.
Acts with a sense of urgency and
responsibility to meet the organization’s
needs, improves system and helps others
improve their effectiveness.
IV.3 Result-Focus (5) POINTS
Achieves results with optimal use of time
and resources most of the time.
Avoids reworks, mistakes and wastage
through effective work methods by
placing organizational needs before
personal needs.
Delivers error-free outputs most of the
time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly & consistently. Able
to produce very satisfactory quality of work
in terms of usefulness/ acceptability and
completeness with no supervision required.

IV.4 Teamwork (5) SCORE

POINTS
INDICATORS 1 2
5 3 4
Willingly does his/her share of
responsibility.
Promotes collaboration & removes barrier
to teamwork & goal decisions
Works constructively & collaboratively with
others & across organizations & to
accomplish organizational goal
• Add all average scores divided by 4 = __________
POINTS Score
V. INNOVATION (5)
Adopted in the School 1
Adopted in the District 2
Adopted in the Area 3
Adopted in the Division 4
Adopted in the Region 5

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL PAPER/PUBLICATION ADVISER


Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
DIRECTION: Please give the appropriate rating corresponding to the rubrics set of every
criterion.
CRITERIA DESCRIPTION POINTS RATING
(10)
1.LEADERSHIP
1.1 Experience/Served as Publication
POTENTIAL
Adviser with Special Order
(25pts.)
2-5 years 2
6-9 years 4
10-13 years 6
4-17 years 8
8 years & above 10
1.2 Attended related training (5)
Area Level 2
Division Level 3
Regional Level 4
National Level 5
1.3 Involvement in Training (5)
Programs/ Content in Journalism
Support Staff 2
Facilitator 3
Speaker/Trainer/Judge 5
1.4 Membership in School Journalism (5)
Publication Organization
Area Level 2
Division Level 3
Regional Level 4
National Level 5
II. (10)
OUTSTANDING 2.1 Average Performance Rating for
PERFORMANCE theLast three (3) school year
(50pts.)
4.500-5.000 Outstanding 10
Very 5
3.500-4.499
Satisfactory
2.2 Winner as PressCon Coach/Adviser (30)
e. Division Level (5))
First Place 5
Second Place 4
Third Place 3
Fourth to Fifth Place 2
Sixth to Seventh Place 1
f. Regional Level (10)
First Place 10
Second Place 8
Third Place 7


g. National Level (15)
First Place 15
Second Place 13
Third Place 12
2.3 Outstanding Awards Received in (10)
Journalism
National Level 10
Regional Level 8
Division Level 6
Area Level 4
III. PHYSICAL & (5)
RECORDS 3.1 Has a well-structured school
MANAGEMENT publication
(15)
Hub/office with the presence of the
following:
a. Bulletin board/display board
where
Editorial staff and publication
liquidation and activities are
posted
b. Transparency board/corner
showing
updated school publication
reports
c. Work tables & seats
d. Filing cabinet or its equivalent
e. Computer set with printer
Presence of 5 items 5
Presence of I item 1
3.2 Has an updated record/filing of (10)
the following:
a. Copies of Constitution & By-Laws
b. Copies of Action Plan 2019-2020,
2020-2021 & 2021-2022
c. School papers for the last 5 years
d. File of liquidation reports for the
last 5 years
e. Updated Record Book of Income
and Expenses of School Publication
& Activities
Presence of 1 item 2

IV. BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES (5) Points

SCALE DEFINITION
5 Role Model
4 Consistently Demonstrates
3 Most of the Time Demonstrates
2 Sometimes Demonstrates
1 Rarely Demonstrates
IV.1 Self-Management (5) POINTS SCORE
Sets personal goals & direction, needs &
development.
Undertakes personal actions and
behaviors that are clear and purposive &
takes into account personal goals and
values congruent to that of the
organization.
Displays emotional maturity and
enthusiasm for and is challenged by
higher goals.
IV.2 Professionalism & Ethics (5) POINTS
Demonstrates the values and behavior
enshrined in the Norms of Conduct &
Ethical Standards for Public Officials &
Employees (RA 6713)
Practices ethical and professional
behavior and conduct taking into
account the impact of his/her action and
decision.
Maintains a professional image:
* Being trustworthy
* Regularity of attendance & punctuality
* Good grooming
* Communication
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the
organization’s needs.
Acts with a sense of urgency and
responsibility to meet the organization’s
needs, improves system and helps others
improve their effectiveness.
IV.3 Result-Focus (5) POINTS
Achieves results with optimal use of time
and resources most of the time.
Avoids reworks, mistakes and wastage
through effective work methods by
placing organizational needs before
personal needs.

Delivers error-free outputs most of the

time by conforming to standard
operating procedures correctly &
consistently. Able to produce very
satisfactory quality of work in terms of
usefulness/ acceptability and
completeness with no supervision
required.
IV.4 Teamwork (5) SCORE
POINTS
Willingly does his/her share of
responsibility.
Promotes collaboration & removes barrier
to teamwork & goal decisions
Works constructively & collaboratively with
others & across organizations & to
accomplish organizational goal
• Add all average scores divided by 4 = __________
POINTS Score
V. INNOVATION (5)
Adopted in the School 1
Adopted in the District 2
Adopted in the Area 3
Adopted in the Division 4
Adopted in the Region 5

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING GAD IMPLEMENTER


Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

MOVs Earned
Policies (25 pts) GAD-related policies (Special Order, Memorandum
Circulars and Board Resolutions) formulated,
implemented, and institutionalized by the school,
2019, 2020, 2021 GAD Plan and Budget, 2019,
2020, 2021 GAD Accomplishment Report
25 pts - presence of 8-10 GAD related policies,

formulated, implemented, and institutionalized and
the 2019, 2020, 2021 GAD Plan and Budget, 2019,


10 pts - presence of 2 GAD related policies,

5 pts - presence of 1 GAD related policies,

3 pts - presence of the (3 yr) 2019, 2020, 2021

GAD Plan and Budget, 2019, 2020, 2021 GAD
2 pts - presence of (2 yr) 2019, 2020, 2021 GAD

Plan and Budget, 2019, 2020, 2021 GAD
1 pt - presence of (1 yr) 2019, 2020, 2021 GAD

Plan and Budget, 2019, 2020, 2021 GAD


MOVs Earned
People (25 pts) GAD related capacity developments (e.g.

training, seminars, orientations, workshops,
etc.) conducted by the school whether for
organizations or for clients; membership of
men and women in the organization; and the
top management support for gender
mainstreaming
25 pts - presence of 8-10 GAD related

capacity developments (e.g. training, seminars,
orientations, workshops, etc) with ACRs, Copy
of Approved Memo, Training Design, Resource
Package, Program, Attendance, pictorials
20 pts - presence of 6-7 GAD related capacity

developments (e.g. training, seminars,
15 pts - presence of 4-5 GAD related capacity

10 pts - presence of 3 GAD related capacity





MOVs Earned
Enabling Structures GAD Focal Point System; established

Mechanisms and institutionalized partnerships with various
(20 pts) stakeholders to develop and implement
programs, projects and activities responding to
gender issues; other enabling mechanisms
established, institutionalized or shared by the
office/school to ensure the gender is
mainstreamed (i.e. structures and systems.
Interagency/inter-LGU committees, TWGs,
GAD database and budget allocation)
20 pts - presence of 4-5 established

partnership (Copy of MOA,
proposal/programs, projects and activities
responding to gender issues; other enabling
mechanisms established), GAD Focal point
system, Interagency/inter-LGU committees,
TWGs, GAD database and budget allocation
10 pts - presence of 3 established partnership

(Copy of MOA, proposal/programs, projects
and activities responding to gender issues;
other enabling mechanisms established), GAD
Focal point system, Interagency/inter-LGU
committees, TWGs, GAD database and budget
allocation

allocation

allocation
2 pts - presence of GAD Focal point system,

Interagency/inter-LGU committees, TWGs,
GAD database and budget allocation


MOVs Earned
Gad Related Number on Information Education and
Programs, Communication (IEC) material produced;
Projects & number of identified PAPs provided; number
Activities of programs and /or projects mainstreamed
(20 pts) with gender perspective or addressing a
gender issue/GAD mandate that were
formulated; implemented and institutionalized
by the school
20 pts - presence of 4-5 IEC material

produced, PAPs addressing gender issue/GAD
mandate formulated, implemented by the
school
10 pts - presence of 3 IEC material produced,

PAPs addressing gender issue/GAD mandate
formulated, implemented by the school


Awards Received Awards/citations received in connection to the

(10 pts) award

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING LIBRARIAN

(ELEMENTARY/SECONDARY/SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL)

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION FOR OUTSTANDING SCHOOL LIBRARIAN
(Elementary/ Secondary/Senior High School)
I. LEADERSHIP POTENTIAL ----------------------------------------------------------------- 35pts.

1.1 Experience served as School Librarian (5pts.)
15 years and above 5pts.

10-14 years 4pts.
7-9 years 3pts
4-6 years 2pts
1-3 years 1pt.
1.2 Attended related training on School Library (5pts.)
National Level 5pts.

Regional Level 4pts.
Division Level 3pts
Area Level 2pts
District/ School Level 1pt.
1.3 Involvement in the Division/ Area/District/ School Activity (5pts.)
Speaker/ Trainer 5pts.

Facilitator 3pts.
Support Staff 2pts
1.4 Qualification of the School Librarian (10pts.)
Full Time Licensed Librarian 10pts.

Library- In- Charge with Library Science units 7pts.
Library- In- Charge/ Teacher Librarian Designate 5pts
Library Aide 3pts

1.4 Conducted School library Activities (10pts.)
5 or more activities conducted 10pts.

4 activities conducted 8pts.
3 activities conducted 6pts
2 activities conducted 4pts
1 activity conducted 2pts.
SCHOOL LIBRARY ACTIVITIES

Updates the Bulletin Board/ Information Board to promote Library and
Information Services
Conducts Orientation on the use of the Library and its services for students and
teachers.
Conducts regular activities that promote library and information services.
Conducts classroom visits to promote library and information services.
Uses social media to promote library and information services.
Conducts and develop linkage with stakeholders
Prepare annual implementation plan on school library operations.
II. OUTSTANDING PERFORMANCE/ AWARDS RECEIVED-------------------------------------------

10pts.
2.1 Performance Rating for the last school year (5pts.)
4.50-5.00 Outstanding 5pts.

3.50-4.49 Very Satisfactory 4pts.
2.50-3.49 Satisfactory 3pts
1.50-2.49 Unsatisfactory 2pts
Below 1.49 Poor 1pt.
2.2 Outstanding Award Received (5pts.)
National Level 5pts.

Regional Level 4pts.
Division Level 3pts
Area Level 2pts
District/ School Level 1pt.

III. Physical/ Records Management------------------------------15pts
Presence of all 5 or more items 15pts.

Presence of all 4 items 12pts.
Presence of all 3 items 9pts
Presence of all 2 items 6pts
Presence of only 1 item 3pts.
PHYSICAL/ RECORDS MANAGEMENT
Library Maintenance
Library users logbook
Library schedule/ library handbook
Library holdings
Adequate space
Transaction records
Collection Development Policy
Vertical files
Accession records
Library statistical report
Library system flow chart
IV. BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES ---------------------------------------- 30 pts.
SCALE DEFINITION
5 Role model

IV.1. SELF MANAGEMENT (5pts.)
Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development 1 2 3 4 5
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and purposive and takes 1 2 3 4 5
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged 1 2 3 4 5
Total score divide by the no. of indicator/s= average
IV.2 PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS (5pts.)
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and Ethical 1 2 3 4 5
Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713)
Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the 1 2 3 4 5
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and 1 2 3 4 5

punctuality, good grooming and communication.
Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs. 1 2 3 4 5
Acts with sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs, 1 2 3 4 5
improve systems and help others improve their effectiveness.
IV.3 RESULT FOCUS (5pts.)
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time 1 2 3 4 5
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing 1 2 3 4 5
organizational needs before personal needs.
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating 1 2 3 4 5

procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of
work in terms of usefulness/ acceptability ad completeness with no supervision
required.

IV. 4 TEAMWORK (5pts.)
Willingly does his/ her share of responsibility 1 2 3 4 5
Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment 1 2 3 4 5

across the organization
Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions 1 2 3 4 5
Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to 1 2 3 4 5

accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
IV. 5. SERVICE ORIENTATION (5pts.)
Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems 1 2 3 4 5
Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service 1 2 3 4 5
issues and concerns
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified procedures 1 2 3 4 5

that will further enhance service delivery.
IV.6. INNOVATION (5pts.)
Examines the root cause of problems and suggest effective solutions. Fosters new 1 2 3 4 5
ideas, processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational
efficiency).
Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on 1 2 3 4 5

improving personal productivity to create higher value and results.
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or 1 2 3 4 5

solutions.
Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness 1 2 3 4 5

and the ability to succeed with minimal resources.

Total Score for behavioral competencies _________
V. PUNCTUALITY/ ATTENDANCE ----------------------------------------------- 5pts.
No absences in a year (excluding special leave and force leave) 5 pts.
1-3 absences in a year (excluding special leave and force leave) 3pts.
4-5 absences in a year (excluding special leave and force leave) 1pt.
SUMMARY OF POINTS
COMPONENTS TOTAL POINTS
I. Leadership (35 pts.)
II.Outstanding Performance (15pts.)
III.Physical Records and Management (15pts.)
IV. Behavioral Competencies (30pts.)
V. Punctuality/ Attendance (5pts.)
TOTAL POINTS (100 pts.)
_________________ _________________ __________________ __________
Member Member Member Member
_____________________
Chairman

SEARCH FOR MOST FUNCTIONAL LIBRARY

(ELEMENTARY/SECONDARY/SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL)

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION FOR MOST FUNCTIONAL SCHOOL LIBRARY
(Elementary/ Secondary/Senior High School)

1. SPACE AND LOCATION ----------------------------------------------------- 15
pts.
1.1Space of school library in terms of seating capacity (5pts)
The library accommodates 10% or more of the total student population 5 pts.
The library accommodates 6-9% of the total student population 3pts.
The library accommodates less than 5% of the total student population. 1pt.
1.2 Library location (5pts)

The school library is in a separate building. 5 pts.
The school library occupies a separate room within a building 3pts.
The school library shares space with others. 1pt.
1.3 Accessibility (5pts.)

The school library is easily accessible from any point in the campus and 5 pts.
is safe from flooding
The school library is not easily accessible from any point in the campus 3 pts.
but is safe from flooding.
The school library is easily accessible from any point in the campus and 1pt.
is not safe from flooding.
2. SERVICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------ 18pts.
2.1 Operating Hours (4pts.)

The library operates from the start of the earliest class period with no 4 pts.
noon break and extends after the last period of classes.
The library operates from the start of the earliest class with no noon 3 pts.
break and extends after the last period of classes.
The library operates from the start of the earliest class period with no 2 pts.
noon break but it closes at the end of the last period.
The library operates from the start of the earliest class period with 1 pt.
noon break but it closes at the end of the last class period.

2.2 School Library Activities (5 pts.)

The Library conducts 3 or more activities 5 pts.
The library conducts 2 activities 3 pts.
The library conducts 1 activity 2 pts.
The library conducts other activity 1pt.
2.2 School Library Services (5 pts.)

The Library conducts 5 or more services. 5 pts.
The library conducts 4 services. 4 pts.
The library conducts 3 services. 3 pts.
The library conducts 2 activities. 2 pts.
The library provides only 1 service 1 pt.
School Library Activities
Updates the Bulletin Board/ Information Board to promote Library and Information
Services (Current Awareness)
Conducts Orientation on the use of the Library and its services for students and teachers.
Conducts regular activities that promote library and information services.
Conducts classroom visits to promote library and information services.
Uses social media to promote library and information services.
School Library Services
Allows borrowing of books for home use.
Allows students to use the computer for encoding, viewing and internet access.
Allows the students to bring books outside the library and returns within the day if not
allowed for home use.
Allows the faculty to use the computer for encoding, viewing and internet access.
The staff prepares clippings (for vertical files collection)
The staff does indexing.

2.3 Collection Access (4 pts.)

Open shelf/ Stack 4pts.
Closed shelf/ Stack 2 pts.
Collection Access System
Open Shelf/ Stack- Shelving in a library to which users have unrestricted access.
Closed Shelf/ Stack- Shelving area in library to which only members of the library staff
have access.
3. ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES------------------------- 9pts.

3.1 Staff Designation (9pts.)
The library has full-time licensed librarian 9pts.
The library has a library In Charge with Library Science 7pts.

Units
The library has a library In Charge/ Teacher-librarian 4pts.
designate
The library has a Library Aide 1pt.
4. COLLECTION MANAGEMENT -------------------------------------------- 32pts.

4.1Bibliographic processing.(5pts.)
All the bibliographic processes are being done 5pts.
Only one/ some of the bibliographic processes is/are being done 3pts.
None of the bibliographic processes is being done 1pt.
Bibliographic Processes
Accessioning- The process of assigning a unique number to a bibliographic item

added to a library collection.
Cataloging- The process of creating entries for a catalog (bibliographic description,

subject analysis)
Classification- The process of dividing objects or concepts into logically hierarchical

classes, subclasses and sub-subclasses based on the characteristics they have in
common and those that distinguish them.
Labelling- The process of putting call numbers of the books.
No processing- The books are displayed with no further bibliographic processing.

4.2 Library Collection Inventory
________________ 4.2.1 General References (5pts.)

________________ 4.2.2 General Collection (5pts.)
________________ 4.2.3 Non- Print Collection(5pts.)
________________ 4.2.4 SRMs (5pts.)
If 20% or more of the total collection (titles) are published within the last 10 5pts.
years
If 10-19%or more of the total collection (titles) are published within the last 4pts.
10 years
If 5-9% or more of the total collection (titles) are published within the last 3pts.
10 years
If 2-4% or more of the total collection (titles) are published within the last 10 2pts.
years
If 1% or less of the total collection (titles) are published within the last 10 1pt.
years
4.2.5 Periodical Collection (7pts.)

3 or more subscriptions in Year 2016 (regardless of type of periodical) 7pts.
If 2 subscriptions in Year 2016 (regardless of type of periodical) 6pts.
If only 1 subscription in Year 2016 (regardless of type of periodical) 5pts.
If latest subscription was on year 2015, 2 subscriptions( regardless of type 4pts.

of periodical)
If latest subscription was on year 2015, 1 subscription regardless of type of 3pts.
periodical)
If latest subscription was on year 2014, 2 subscription regardless of type of 2pts.
periodical)
If latest subscription was on year 2014, 1 subscription regardless of type of 1pt.
periodical)
5. ACQUISITION--------------------------------------------------------------- 14pts.
5.1 Book Acquisition (7pts.)
MOOE, LGU, NGO, PTA, DepEd, Alumni others 7pts.
MOOE, LGU,PTA 6pts.
either/both of MOOE, LGU, PTA, Alumni 5pts.
MOOE + either/ both of NGO, DepEd, Others 4pts.
MOOE 3pts.

either both of NGO, DepEd, Others 2pts.
either NGO, DepEd, Others 1pt.
5.2 Sources School Library Budget (7pts.)

MOOE, LGU, NGO, PTA, DepEd, Alumni others 7pts.
MOOE, LGU,PTA 6pts.
either/both of MOOE, LGU, PTA, Alumni 5pts.
MOOE + either/ both of NGO, DepEd, Others 4pts.
MOOE 3pts.
either both of NGO, DepEd, Others 2pts.
either NGO, DepEd, Others 1pt.
6. FACILITIES ------------------------------------------------------------------- 12pts.
6.1Library physical facility (5pts.)
If the library has 9-10 facilities. 5pts.
If the library has 1-2 facilities. 1pt.
LIBRARY PHYSICAL FACILITY
OPAC (Online Public Access Catalog)
Card Catalog Cabinet with Catalog Cards
Tables and Chairs (Reading Area)
Librarian’s table and chair
Circulation Counter

Activity Area
Magazine/ Newspaper rack
Bookshelves
Book stand, book ends
Information/Bulletin board
6.2 Library ICT facilities.(7pts.)
Computer with internet connection + 5 other facilities 7pts.
Computer without internet connection + 2 other facilities 4pts.
Computer without internet connection + 1 other facilities 3pts.
No computer but has other facilities 2pts.
No computer and has one other facility 1pt.
ICT Facilities
Computer set
Projector
Document Camera
DVD Player
Photocopier
Scanner
Printer w/ scanner
Internet connection/ modem
Television
Others (Please specify)

SUMMARY OF POINTS
COMPONENTS TOTAL
POINTS
1. Space and Location (15pts.)
2.Services (18pts.)
3.Administration and Human Resources

(9pts.)
4.Collection Management (32pts.)
5.Acquisition(14pts.)
6.Facilities (12pts.)
Total Points (100%)
___________________ ___________________ _________________
Member Member Member
__________________________
Chairperson

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING GPP COORDINATOR


Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA MODE OF VERIFICATION PARTICIPANT’S

POINTS
A. Implementation of GPP Program
1. Governance- 20 points
1 Special Order Special order/certification

2 Action Plan Action Plan
3.Project Proposal Approved proposal
4. School Crop Menu Plan Menu Plan
5. Implementation of Integrated Transmittal/endorsement
School
Nutrition Model (ISNM) and
related activities Approved ACR
6. Activity Completion Report/Project
Completion Report Copy of Liquidation/Transmittal
7. Liquidation Report/Utilization
Report Communications, letter
8.Monitoring Report per Quarter
1-3 accomplished documents-10

points
points
points

2. Networking, Linkages and

Collaboration – 30 points
a. Involvement in other agencies like Communication, letter

Department of Agriculture, DAR, VSU
or TESDA- 10 points
Communication, letters
b. Involvement with community,
barangay, 4 Ps recipient, other Letter/communication
stakeholders- 10 points
c. Involvement with private

organization or non-government Acknowledgement receipts,
organizations like East West deed of donations or any proof
Foundation, Agrivet Company and of receipt
others- 10 points
B. Other Qualifications- 30 points

Certification, S.O
1. Experience as GPP Coordinator for
the last 3 years- 10 points
C. Training attended, Seminar,

Orientation and Workshops Certificate of Participation,
attended related to YFD mandated Recognition, Appreciation and
programs, OK Kalusugan & ISNM- Certificate of Attendance
10 points
D. Awards, Recognition related to

GPP Program either community, Certificate of Recognition
school or local government-10
points
E. Leadership Initiative and

advocacy of the GPP program-5 Innovation, proposal, conduct
points orientation on GPP
F. Other skills training, diploma and TESDA NC Certificate,
licenses acquired in related to GPP - appearance or attendance in
5 points short courses

5. SUSTAINABILITY OF THE
PROJECT- 5 points
ACR/Project Proposal
1. School Year 2019-2020
2. School year 2020-2021
3. School year 2021-2022
6. IMPACT ON SCHOOL LEARNER SBFP Report/MPS Result

IN RELATION TO NUTRITIONAL
STATUS, AND PERFORMANCE OF
SCHOOL LEA (MPS) – 5 points

CRITERIA FOR JUDGING INNOVATIVE, EFFECTIVE, AND BEST PRACTICES ON

TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE (TA) PROVISION

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________
CRITERIA STANDARD WT. REMARKS/ MOVs

1. The District has a clear plan for the
✓ Strategy/Modality 10% ✓ District Technical Assistance (TA)
development, implementation, and promotion
of Implementation Plan
of technical assistance provision.
2. Appropriate and effective methods and 5% ✓ Appropriate and effective methods
resources are used to implement the and resources are reflected in the
practice in schools. TA Plan
3. Monitoring and evaluation mechanisms or 5% ✓ Accomplished Monitoring and
processes are identified to safeguard the
Evaluation plans and procedures
immediate and long-term outcomes of the
(and the accomplished M&E Tools)
practice.
1. The practice has demonstrated instructive
✓ Innovation and and innovative modes in promoting the
7.5% ✓ Advocacy activities and
Creativity implementation strategies
practice to Schools Division.
2. The entry is a new idea/concept or an 7.5% ✓ Comprehensive conceptual
improved/adapted version of an existing framework
activity, implemented by the Division.
1. Results, after implementation, have shown
✓ Reliability and 15% ✓ Accomplishments of the District
the effectiveness and benefits of the TA
Achievement such as periodic MPS of schools in
practice. 5%
the District, NAT, improvement of
2. Proof of other achievements of the District
schools’ performance
is demonstrated.
✓ Awards received, certificates of
recognition, funding generated by
the District
1. The District has demonstrated the use of 5%
✓ Participatory and ✓ Activity completion reports,
inclusive, consultative, and participatory
Inclusive minutes of meetings, proofs
processes with all the technical personnel in
ofattendance, etc.
the District in planning and implementing
theTA practice. ✓ MOAs, MOUs, Resolutions of
2. The District has demonstrated the 5% Support, and other fund support
relationships that exist between Schools in evidences
the District and local communities, local
education authorities, and other
organizations to support the Division’s TA
practice.

1. The District has received financial or in-

✓ Sustainability 3% ✓ Support evidence of the
kind support from stakeholders, local
Stakeholders
government, and communities for the
7%
continued implementation of the TA practice. ✓ TA Plan
2. The District has fully integrated practices
in the District management plan for long-term
actions.
1. Results of the evaluation identified positive
✓ Impact/Effective- 15% ✓ Percentage of schools with
transformation and change that the schools
ness improved performance of the priority
have all gained from the implementation of
needs of the division for TA
the practice.
provision
2. The District has demonstrated that the 10%
practice has significantly changed/improved ✓ Improved Performance Indicators
the District’s performance. of the District (Baseline: 2018-
2019)
Total
100%
SCORING: Range Description
90 – 100% - Best Practice

75 – 89% - Effective Practice
50 – 74% - Innovative Practice
49% & below - Ordinary Practice

DM No. 587, S. 2023 2023 Schools Division Office of Leyte Search For Most Outstanding Officials I Employees I Schools

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DM No. 587, S. 2023 2023 Schools Division Office of Leyte Search For Most Outstanding Officials I Employees I Schools

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Republic of the Philippines

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 2 of 429

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 3 of 429

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 4 of 429

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 5 of 429

2023 SDO LEYTE SEARCH FOR THE MOST OUTSTANDING

June 06, PLANNING PRAISE Committee Validated guidelines and

Presentation, review and PRAISE Reviewed, presented and

Issuance of Memorandum of PRAISE Committee Issued Memorandum:

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 6 of 429

School level School PRAISE Committee Screened school level winners

District level District PRAISE Committee Screened district level winners

Submission of Nominees by The Nomination Forms, List of Nominees from the

August 01- Screening and shortlisting: PRAISE Screened qualified and

September Panel interview (5 minute PRAISE Panel Interview conducted

TBA Conduct of PRESTIGIO/ Venue / TBA Conducted PRESTIGIO/

TBA Submission of Activity PRAISE Committee/Secretariat Submitted the Activity

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 7 of 429

1. General Conditions - The following conditions shall be followed:

1. A model of morality and integrity both in public and private life.

2. Has good human relations in the school, district, Schools Division

3. A permanent DepEd personnel who has rendered at least three (3)

6. For personnel who availed of any scholarship or study grant which

7. There shall be a cut-off score of 70 points for all awards to qualify as

B. Grounds for Disqualification

1. Nominees/candidates for any of the award shall have no pending case

3. Non-compliance with the submission of the complete documentary

4. Misrepresentation, bribery, and any form of special favors to the

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 8 of 429

3.1 The Division PRAISE Committee shall deliberate on the consolidation of

3.2 Validity of the outstanding/meritorious accomplishments and trainings shall be

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 9 of 429

4.4 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCRF) or Office

4.8 Omnibus Certification of Authenticity and Veracity of Documents- This is a

4.9 The nomination form and other documentary requirements should be

a. Screening, Evaluation of Documents, and Interview Stage

1. Nomination from the School/District - Each School/District shall

2. Nomination from the Functional Division - Each Functional Division

3. Validation and Interview – The Division PRAISE Committee shall

If face-to-face interview is not possible, teleconferencing, and other online

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 10 of 429

The Division PRAISE Committee shall deliberate on the consolidation of

4. Publication of the Final Results, Awarding Ceremonies and

4.2 Publication and Notification of Final Result – The official results of

4.3 Criteria and Standards – The evaluation of nominees’ documents for

4.5 Other Considerations – Other similar circumstances or considerations

4.6 Policy Review and Enhancement – the Division PRAISE Committee

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 11 of 429

MOST OUTSTANDING SCHOOL PROPERTY CUSTODIAN/ SUPPLY OFFICER

DULAG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Signature of Nominator: _______________________________ Date Signed: _________________

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 12 of 429

OMNIBUS CERTIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY AND VERACITY OF DOCUMENTS

SUBSCRIBE AND SWORN to before me this __________day of __________________, 20 ________, affiant

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 13 of 429

POTENTIAL/INTERVIEW CHECKLIST & RATING SHEET

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 14 of 429

SEARCH FOR MOST OUTSTANDING KINDERGARTEN TEACHER I-III

Name of Nominee: ____________________________________________________________________

MEANS OF VERIFICATION Points

(053) 888-3527  leyte.ro8@deped.gov.ph Page 15 of 429

2. Innovations (5 points) ✓ Copy of the Innovation

3. Research and Development Projects (5 points) ✓ Copy of the complete

Signature of Nominator: _______________ Date Signed: _

SUBSCRIBE AND SWORN to before me this day of , 20 , affiant