You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/340121329

Determination of the series resistance of a solar cell through its maximum


power point

Article in African Journal of Science Technology Innovation and Development · March 2020
DOI: 10.1080/20421338.2020.1731073

CITATIONS READS

6 924

5 authors, including:

Hubert AZODA KOFFI A. A. Yankson


University of Ghana University of Ghana
16 PUBLICATIONS 40 CITATIONS 6 PUBLICATIONS 27 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Allison Felix Hughes Kofi Ampomah-Benefo


University of Ghana CSIR Institute of Industrial Research
45 PUBLICATIONS 649 CITATIONS 4 PUBLICATIONS 6 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Hubert AZODA KOFFI on 26 March 2020.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 2020
https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1731073
© 2020 African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development

Determination of the series resistance of a solar cell through its maximum power point
H. A. Koffi *, A. A. Yankson, A. F. Hughes, K. Ampomah-Benefo and J. K. A. Amuzu

Department of Physics, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana


*Corresponding author email: hakoffi@ug.edu.gh, Drazokoff@gmail.com

A simple analytical approach has been developed to determine the series resistance, Rs, of a solar cell. The method adopted
here depends only on the knowledge of the open-circuit voltage, Voc, and the current and voltage at the maximum power
point, Isc and Vmp respectively. This approach, based on a knowledge of these operating output parameters of the cell,
provides a theoretical framework for an existing computer simulated approach which has been widely used in industries.

Keywords: solar cell, five-parameter model, series resistance, light generated current, shunt resistance, short-circuit current

Introduction (ii) a diode expressing the requirement of a threshold


Modelling a solar cell is a basic means for extracting the energy level for the photons to trigger a significant
effective operating values of the parameters governing production and circulation of paired electrons and
the behaviour of the device. The most widely considered holes across the junction;
among existing models is the five-parameter model. In (iii) a series resistance representing the metal–semicon-
that model, the equation governing the behaviour of the ductor contact resistance, the ohmic resistance in
cell is formulated as a transcendental exponential equation the metal contacts, and the ohmic resistance in the
involving five parameters namely the light generated semiconductor material;
current (IL), the reverse saturated current (IS), the operat- (iv) a shunt resistance representing the leaking currents
ing temperature (T ), the shunt resistance (Rsh), and the along the edges of the solar cell.
series resistance (RS).
The most investigated parameters out of the five is the From Figure 1, the current produced by the solar cell is
series resistance which represents the sum of the contact equal to that produced by the current source, IL, minus that
resistance in the metal–semiconductor contacts, the which flows through the diode, ID, minus that which flows
ohmic resistance in the metal contacts, and the ohmic through the shunt resistor, ISh, so that the equation
resistance in the semiconductor material (Goetzberger, governing the current flowing across the load is given
Knobloch, and Voss 1998, 79). This is due to the fact by equation 1:
that the series resistance affects the output power of the
solar cell more than any other parameter (Goetzberger, ⎡   ⎤
q(V + IRs )
Knobloch, and Voss 1998). Also, to determine one or
⎢ AkB T ⎥ V + IRs
more of these parameters, different approaches have I = IL − Is ⎣e − 1⎦ − (1)
been developed although some are somehow cumbersome Rsh
(Koffi 2013). In this paper, an analytical approach has
been developed to underpin an existing computer-based
where I is the output current, T the operating temperature,
solution employed in determining the series resistance of
Is the reverse saturation current, q the unit electric charge,
a solar cell. To do so, an alternative formulation of the
KB the Boltzmann constant and A the ideality factor, a
five-parameter model equation of a solar cell has been
constant that measures how closely the basic Shockley
used with the view of establishing a simple method to
equation describes the ideal diode that is set to unity in
determine the series resistance of a solar cell. Indeed,
the five-parameter model. The relevant five parameters
this method helps to determine in a simple way the
of the model are T, IL, Is, Rs, Rsh.
series resistance of any operating solar cell by knowing
Several approaches, ranging from analytical to com-
its open circuit voltage and the voltage and current at its
puter-based solutions, exist to determine the series resist-
maximum power point which are three parameters easily
ance of a solar cell and one of the earliest approaches to
accessible from any I-V curve or manufacturer datasheet.
the solution of equation 1 is experiment-based and
involves the determination of Rs through the measure-
ment of the output current of the cell which is exposed
Background
to light of known intensity (Rauschenbach and Wolf
In the five-parameter model, a solar cell is represented by
1963). However, analytical approaches providing more
the equivalent circuit shown in Figure 1:The circuit con-
accurate results have been widely used (Sharma et al.
sists of:
1993). In some cases, three characteristic points,
(i) a light-based current generator representing the namely the short-circuit-current (Isc, 0), the open-circuit
source of current production when the inherent voltage (0, Voc) and the maximum power point (Imp,
voltage across the junction is connected to an external Vmp) derived from the current–voltage (I-V ) curve, are
load; then used to express the current as follows (Lasnier and

African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development is co-published by NISC Pty (Ltd) and Informa Limited (trading as Taylor & Francis Group)
2 Koffi, Yankson, Hughes, Ampomah-Benefo and Amuzu

Figure 1. Diagram of the five-parameter model of a solar cell.

Sivoththaman 1990): Figure 2: The Agilent method to determine the series and the
shunt resistances (Agilent 2020).
⎡  ⎤
V
− 1
⎢ ⎥
I = ISC ⎣1 − C1 e C2 Voc ⎦ (2)
Voc − Vmp
RS = (6)
Imp
where ISC is the short-circuit current,
  ln (2 − 2a )
−Vm N=
Im +1 Imp
(7)
C1 = 1 − e C2 Voc (3) ln
Isc Isc

And Isc
Vmp × 1 + RS × + RS × (Imp − Isc )
  Voc
Vm a= (8)
−1 Voc
Voc
C2 =   (4)
Im
log 1 −
Isc where V is the output voltage, Vmp and Imp the voltage and
current at the maximum power point respectively, and a
Concurrently with analytical solutions, special functions- and N are inbuilt algorithm-based parameters with N
based forms of solutions also exist. Among them, the strongly related to the shunt resistance.
Lambert W-function is used to determine the series resist-
ance of the solar cell (Jain and Kapoor 2004). Also, the
Special Trans Function Theory (STFT) is used to deter- Determination of the series resistance
mine the series resistance of the solar cell. (Singh, Jain, The analytical approach to the determination of Rs dis-
and Kapoor 2009). cussed in this work is based on the fact that our previous
On the other hand, digital forms or computer-based work has established that equation 1 can be re-arranged
solutions of the equations governing the output of as follows (Koffi et al. 2015):
solar devices are most often used when the behaviour
⎡   ⎤
of the device is simulated either in a laboratory or q(V + IRs )
with a computer. Among them are the Sandia National ⎢ AkB T ⎥ V
I = ISC − ISR ⎣e − 1⎦ − (9)
Labs Model (King, Boyson, and Kratochvill 2004) and Rs + Rsh
the Agilent Technology method to determine the
series resistance and shunt resistances. The Agilent
Technology method is an empirical computer-based with
analytical determination of Rs. In this method (Agilent
2020), a graphical approach (Figure 2) and a set of IL
ISC = (10)
equations (equations 5, 6, 7 and 8) are used to determine t
the series resistance.
This approach yields the following results: IS
ISR = (11)
t
N
I
Voc × ln 2 −
Isc Rs
− RS × (I − Isc ) t=1+ (12)
ln (2) Rsh
V= (5)
RS × Isc
1+
Voc and A, kB and T have their usual meanings.
African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development 3

Since the reverse saturation current is as follows (Sze Secondly, for any value of Rsh and since Rsh  1 for
1981, 796–804): q(V + IRs )
AkB T V
⎡  ⎤ an ideal cell, e ≫ and the contri-
q(Voc ) Rs + Rsh

⎢ AkB T ⎥ bution of the linear term in equation 15 can also be neg-
IS = IL ⎣e ⎦ (13)
lected so that at optimal conditions, equation 15 becomes

⎡  ⎤
then q(V + IRs − Voc )
⎢ AkB T ⎥
I = Isc ⎣ 1 − e ⎦ (16)
⎡  ⎤
q(Voc )

⎢ ⎥
ISR = ISC ⎣e AkB T ⎦ (14)
and the output power given by

so that equation 1 becomes  ⎡   ⎤


 q(V + IRs − Voc ) 
⎧ ⎡     ⎤⎫  
q(V + IRs − Voc ) −qVoc ⎪  ⎢ AkB T ⎥

⎨ ⎬ P = |VI| = V ISC ⎣1 − e ⎦ (17)
 
⎢ AkB T ⎥  
I = ISC 1 − ⎣e − e AkB T ⎦

⎩ ⎪

V dP
− At the maximum output power, = 0 and since
Rs + Rsh dV
dP ∂V ∂I ∂I
(15) = I +V = I + V , then
dV ∂V ∂V ∂V
The I-V characteristics describing equation 9, including ⎡ ⎤
q(V + IRs − Voc )
the effect of variation in the series resistance, are presented dP ⎢ ⎥
in Figure 3. = ISC ⎣1 − e AkB T ⎦ + VISC
dV
For usual operating temperatures in the range 300 K ≤
T≤ 350 K and A = 1, one can estimate that
−q   q(V + IRs − Voc )
q ∂I
Ak × − 1 + Rs e AkB T
e B T ; e[−34]  1.7 × 10−15 . Therefore, in equation AkB T ∂V
15, for any solar device
 forwhich Voc ≥ 1 v, the second (18)
−qVoc
exponential term, e AkB T can be neglected for any ⎧ ⎫
value of operating temperature in the usual range. ⎪
⎨   q(V +IRs −Voc ) ⎪

dP qV ∂I
Also, Figure 3 shows that the effect of increasing = ISC 1− 1+ 1+Rs e AkB T
dV ⎪
⎩ AkB T ∂V ⎪

series resistance is to reduce the area under the curve
which gives the maximum power generated by the cell (19)
(Worldscibooks 2020). It also shows that the influence
of the series resistance is more significant after the
maximum power point where the exponential factor con- Previous work (Rodriguez and Amaratunga 2007) has
trols the shape of the I-V curve. established that


∂I  1
 =− (20)
∂V VOC Rs

and Koffi (2013) has shown that equation 20 is equally


applicable at the maximum power point:


∂I  1
 =− (21)
∂V Vmp Rs

so that for equation 19, at the maximum power point,

qV ∂I
Figure 3: I-V characteristic with effect of increasing series resist- 1 + Rs =0 (22)
ance (Worldscibooks 2020). AkB T ∂V V mp
4 Koffi, Yankson, Hughes, Ampomah-Benefo and Amuzu

leading to References
Agilent Technology. 2020. “Generating I-V Curves with the
⎧ ⎫ Agilent E4360A Solar Array Simulator Using the
 ⎪
⎨ q[Vmp + (Imp × Rs ) − Voc ] ⎪


dP  Parameters Voc, Isc, N, and Rs.” Accessed January 2,
 = ISC 1 − e AkB T (23) 2020. www.agilenttechnology.com.
dV Vmp ⎪
⎩ ⎪
⎭ Goetzberger, A., J. Knobloch, and B. Voss. 1998. Crystalline
Silicon Solar Cells. Chichester, UK: John Willey & Sons.
∂P ISBN 0-471-9744-8.
Clearly, therefore, for ISC = 0, = 0 implies Jain, A., and A. Kapoor. 2004. “Exact Analytical Solutions
∂V of the Parameters of Real Solar Cells Using Lambert
q[Vmp + (Imp × Rs ) − Voc ] W-Function.” Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells 81:
269–277.
e AkB T =1 (24) King, D., W. Boyson, and J. Kratochvill. 2004. Photovoltaic
Array Performance Model, SAND2004-3535.
Consequently, for any given value of T = 0, Albuquerque, NM: Sandia National Laboratories.
Koffi, H. A. 2013. “Influence of Climatic Parameters on the
Vmp + (Imp × RS ) − Voc = 0 (25) Performance of Silicon Solar Panels in Southern
Ghana.” PhD thesis, Department of Physics, University
of Ghana.
Hence the series resistance, Rs , is found to be Koffi, H. A., A. Kuditcher, V. C. K. Kakane, E. A. Armah, A. A.
Yankson, and J. K. A. Amuzu. 2015. “The Shockley Five-
Voc − Vmp Parameter Model of a Solar Cell: A Short Note.” African
RS = (26) Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and
Imp
Development 7 (6): 491–494.
Lasnier, F., and S. Sivoththaman. 1990. “Photovoltaic System
Equation 26 is identical to the result obtained by the Sizing and Performance by the Comparison of Demand
empirical computer-based analytical approach to the deter- and Expected Radiations.” International Journal of Solar
mination of the series resistance of a solar cell (equation 6). Energy 9: 65–76.
Rauschenbach, H., and M. Wolf. 1963. “Series Resistance
Effects on Solar Cell Measurements.” Advanced Energy
Conclusion
Conversion 3: 455–479.
This work has formulated a simple approach to the deter- Rodriguez, C., and G. Amaratunga. 2007. “Analytic Solution to
mination of the series resistance of a solar cell. Indeed, it the Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Problem.” IEEE
has shown that the series resistance is fully determined Transactions on Circuits and Systems 54 (9): 2054–2060.
only by the knowledge of the open-circuit voltage and Sharma, S. K., D. Pavithra, N. Srinivasamurthy, and B. L.
Agrawal. 1993. “Determination of Solar Cell Parameters:
the current and voltage at the maxim power point. This
An Analytical Approach.” Journal of Physics D: Applied
result, based on a new formulation of the general equation Physics 26: 1130–1133.
guiding the behaviour of a solar cell, provides an analyti- Singh, S. N., A. Jain, and A. Kapoor. 2009. “Determination of
cal basis approach to underpin an existing computer simu- the Solar Cell Junction Ideality Factor Using Special Trans
lated solution to the series resistance of a solar cell. This is Function Theory (STFT).” Solar Energy Materials and
Solar Cells 93: 1423–1426.
shown by the identical formulation of our result (equation
Sze, S. M. 1981. Physics of Semiconductor Devices. 2nd ed.
26) to that of the Agilent Technology method (equation 6). New York: Willey & Sons.
Worldscibooks. 2020. The Physics of Solar Cells.
ORCID World Sciences Books. pp. 14. Accessed January 2, 2020.
H. A. Koffi http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4783-5999 www.Worldscibooks-comp.com/pdf.

View publication stats

You might also like