Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Collegian
j o ur nal ho me pag e : www. e l s e v ie r . com/l ocat e /col l
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Background: Communication competency, self-leadership, a personal factor, is another important
Received 24 March 2016
factor influencing organizational performance.
Received in revised form 13 July 2016
Aim: This study identified the effects of self-leadership and communication competence on the job
Accepted 9 September 2016
performance of general hospital nurses.
Methods: Study participants were 211 nurses working in hospitals in Gyeonggi and Jeonbuk provinces,
Keywords:
Job performance
South Korea. Data were collected from October to December 2015 using a structured questionnaire
Self-leadership and analysed using SPSS Statistics 21.
Communication competence Findings: Self-leadership and communication competence positively correlated with nursing perfor-
Nurse mance. Communication competency played a partial mediating role in the relationship between nurses’
self-leadership and job performance.
Discussion: There was a significant mediating effect of communication competence on the relationship
between nurses’ self-leadership and job performance.
Conclusions: Management-level workers in general hospitals should have the necessary skills and
strate- gies to develop nurses’ communication competence and improve nurses’ recognition of self-
leadership to achieve high performance.
© 2016 Australian College of Nursing Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1. Introduction
that 50% of sentinel errors among nurses occurred because of a
communication problem. In addition, nurses in clinical settings
The nursing profession involves providing care for patients 24
have reported that communication is the most difficult of their
h a day and communicating with the patient, his/her guardian,
tasks, indicating the necessity of ensuring that all nurses possess
and other medical staff. Nursing outcomes vary by communication
adequate communication competency (Seo, Park, & Lee, 2003).
effectiveness. In other words, nursing is a technical profession
Communication competency has been confirmed as a valuable
based on interpersonal relationships that require mutual coop-
resource for improving nursing services in nursing organiza-
eration; indeed, interpersonal competence is a decisive element
tions (Lim et al., 2012; Park, Lee, Lee, & Park, 2015). Studies on
for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of nursing ser-
communication competency among nurses have investigated the
vices (Huber, 2000). Thus, communication competency is critical.
relevance of such competency to their conflict management meth-
Smooth communication is a major means of solving collision and
ods (Lee, 2011), job satisfaction and organizational commitment
conflict between organization members and is also connected to
(Jang, 2010), emotional labour (Kim & Lee, 2014), and servant
job performance, so efforts to improve communication in the
leadership (Park et al., 2015). Overall, the results suggest that com-
nursing organization are essential (Lim, Park, & Kim, 2012).
munication competency is essential for nurses.
An important cause of sentinel events in hospitals is
Besides communication competency, self-leadership, a personal
communication-related problems (Joint Commission Center for
factor, is another important factor influencing organizational per-
Transforming Healthcare, 2007). The Joint Commission reported
formance. Self-leadership refers to the thinking and behaviour
strategies collectively used to exercise self-influence, and empha-
sizes that autonomy is an internal fundamental inclination of
∗ Corresponding author.
human beings. More specifically, self-leadership refers to the pro-
E-mail addresses: yukyungko@gmail.com, yukyko@wku.ac.kr (Y. Ko). cess of leading oneself and engaging in responsible behaviour
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2016.09.002
1322-7696/© 2016 Australian College of Nursing Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2 S. Yu, Y. Ko / Collegian 24 (2017) 421–425
when autonomy and responsibility are given (Manz & Sims, 2001).
purpose and data collection method personally and received coop-
Leadership that aims to secure nurse expertise and autonomy is
eration and approval consistent with the prescribed procedure
necessary in a nursing organization. Such leadership should be
from each institution.
follower-oriented, rather than leader-oriented—namely, it should
be based on ensuring the autonomy, equality, and participation of
organization members (Kim, 2005). Seomun, Chang, Cho, Kim, and 2.3. Ethical considerations
Lee (2006) studied the relationship between nurse self-leadership
and job performance, and asserted that they had a close relation- Before the survey was undertaken, its purpose was explained
ship. to the responsible managers of nursing departments in the
This study sought to determine the relationship between relevant hospitals, after which we requested their cooperation. A
nurses’ self-leadership, communication competency, and job researcher then visited the nursing departments in the hospitals
performance. Although researchers have confirmed the that gave their consent for data collection and distributed the
relationship between self-leadership and organizational outcomes questionnaires. Only nurses who listened to the description of the
(Godwin, 2003) and between self-leadership, job satisfaction, and study purpose and gave their written consent to participate were
job performance (Cho, 2003), none have confirmed the possible recruited. Nurses’ anonymity was guaranteed and they were told
mediating effect of communication competency on the that they could stop answering the questionnaire at any time they
relationship between self- leadership and job performance. wished.
Therefore, the relationships of degree of self-leadership, Before distributing the questionnaire, a researcher or nurse in
communication competency, and job performance were examined charge of education in the hospital described the study purpose
among nurses working in general hos- pitals in South Korea. and how to complete the questionnaire and consent forms. Each
More specifically, this study examines the relationships of nurse was asked to complete the self-report questionnaire person-
general characteristics, self-leadership, and communication com- ally. It took approximately 15 min for all participants to complete
petency with nurses’ job performance and determines the the survey form. The study procedure of this research project was
mediating effect of communication competency on the relationship approved by the institutional review board (**IRB-201510-049).
between self-leadership and job performance. The specific study All
aims are as follows: information was handled anonymously and confidentially and was
not used for any other purpose. We explained to the participants
(1) Determine the level of self-leadership, communication compe- the study goal, the fact that they were free to withdraw from the
tency, and job performance among nurses working in general study at any stage, and the fact that they would not be at a disad-
hospitals. vantage if they did not participate. We proceeded with the study
(2) Confirm the differences in job performance according to the after receiving their informed consent for study participation.
general characteristics of nurses working in general hospitals.
(3) Confirm the correlations between self-leadership, communica- 2.4. Main research variables
tion competency, and job performance.
(4) Determine whether communication competency acts as a A structured self-report questionnaire was used to measure the
mediator in the relationship between self-leadership and job variables. The questionnaire comprised 60 items in total, including
performance among nurses. 7 items for participants’ general characteristics, 18 items for the
self-leadership measure, 15 items for the communication compe-
tency measure, and 19 items for the job performance measure.
2. Methods
1) Self-leadership
2.1. Study design
Table 1
Table 2
Degree of Self-Leadership, Communication Competency, and Job Performance
Correlations between Self-Leadership, Communication Competency, and Job Per-
Among Hospital Nurses (N = 211).
formance (N = 211).
Variables M ± SD Range Cronbach’s α
Variables Self-Leadership Communication Nursing Performance
Self-Leadership 3.70 ± 0.41 1–5 0.888
Communication 3.60 ± 0.45 1–5 0.903 r(p) r(p) r(p)
Nursing Performance 2.97 ± 0.28 1–4 0.891 Self-Leadership 1.00
Communication 0.697 1.00
(<0.001)
Nursing 0.599 0.550 1.00
2) Nursing job performance measurement Performance (<0.001) (<0.001)
Table 3
Mediating Effect of Communication Competency on the Relationship between Self-Leadership and Job Performance (N = 211).
Model β p F(p) R2
Nursing performance Step 1 β1 = 0.758 <0.001 197.08 (<0.001) 0.485
Step 2 β2 = 0.410 <0.001 116.92 (<0.001) 0.359
Step 3 β3 = 0.287 <0.001 67.31 (<0.001) 0.393
β4 = 0.162 0.001
If β3 is also statistically significant, β3 should be smaller than β2 to denote a partial mediating effect.
β1 : Relationship between self-leadership and communication competency in Step 1.
β2 : Relationship between self-leadership and job performance in Step 2.
β3 : Relationship between self-leadership and job performance in Step 3.
β4 : Relationship between communication competency and job performance in Step 4.