Essay On Gratitude

Crafting an essay on the theme of gratitude can be both challenging and rewarding. While expressing
gratitude is a universally appreciated sentiment, transforming it into a well-structured and engaging
essay demands a thoughtful approach. The difficulty lies not in the scarcity of content but in the
depth and authenticity with which one can explore the concept.

Gratitude, by its nature, is a profound and personal emotion, making it tricky to capture its essence
in words. It requires a delicate balance between self-reflection and a broader understanding of
gratitude's impact on individuals and society. The challenge is not just to enumerate reasons to be
grateful but to delve into the nuances of how gratitude shapes our perceptions, relationships, and
overall well-being.

Moreover, conveying gratitude goes beyond a mere recitation of thankful moments; it involves
weaving a narrative that resonates with the audience. The writer must navigate through the fine line
between sentimentality and substance, ensuring that the essay is not just a collection of clichés but a
genuine exploration of the subject.

Researching for the essay can also be demanding. It necessitates a comprehensive examination of
psychological, sociological, and philosophical aspects of gratitude. Incorporating relevant studies,
quotes, and anecdotes adds depth to the content, but it requires a meticulous search for credible
sources.

On a personal level, introspection becomes a crucial part of the writing process. The writer needs to
tap into their own experiences, searching for moments of genuine gratitude and articulating them in a
way that resonates with readers. This introspective aspect of the essay can be emotionally
challenging but is essential for authenticity.

In conclusion, while the topic of gratitude may seem straightforward, crafting an essay that truly
captures its essence involves navigating through layers of emotion, introspection, and research. The
difficulty lies in striking a balance between depth and accessibility, ensuring that the essay is not only
intellectually stimulating but also emotionally resonant.

For those seeking assistance in tackling such challenging topics, it's worth noting that there are
resources available. Similar essays and more can be explored or commissioned through platforms like
HelpWriting.net , where skilled writers can provide support in articulating complex ideas with clarity
and depth.
Essay On Gratitude Essay On Gratitude
 Analysis Of Jean Dubois s The Battle We Wage
DuBois s purpose is to try to convince people to see blacks as equal to whites, and
DuBois largely uses people s patriotism to make his readers relate and associate with his
cause. These appeals to emotion, combined with his strong voice and diction, create an
effective argument for equal rights and treatment for all people.
DuBois uses patriotism to make people feel guilty and ashamed in order to align people
with his cause of equal rights for all people, white and black. DuBois feels that equality is
necessary for all people not only because the Constitution states that all men are created
equal , but because it is a human right that belongs to any freeborn American. The battle
we wage is not for ourselves alone but for all true ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
DuBois feels that inequality will slowly eat away at America because inequality requires
people to have different morals and ethics than the ones used to build our nation, which
weakens our foundation. Separation in railways and street cars, based simply on race
and color, is un American, un democratic, and silly. Dubois is once again attempting to
create a feeling of guilt. DuBois creates guilt by calling the people that are in favor of
segregation not only un American, but just silly. DuBois s purpose in creating these
emotions in the audience is to get them to side with his cause, to reflect on their previous
actions and thoughts and realize that they aren t doing the right thing, and that they
should start listening to DuBois.
DuBois uses a chiasmus to engage his audience with a call to action in order to persuade
his audience to fix problems with segregation. Dubois wants all children to be given the
opportunity of a proper education, not just white children, because he feels that the
school systems in the South are a disgrace and in few towns and cities are Negro schools
what they ought to be. DuBois wants the national government to step in and wipe out
illiteracy in the South he then goes out and states that Either the United States will
destroy ignorance or ignorance will destroy the United States. The chiasmus DuBois uses
is meant to produce an ultimatum, to give the audience
 Theme Of Storytelling In The Things They Carried
Storytelling is like opening a window to the mind of the listeners. Stories provide the
chance to experience a wide variety of emotions without actually having to go through
the situations in which you would feel them. Tim O Brien uses himself to show us that
storytelling and memory can help alleviate burdens over time. Through the book, The
Things They Carried, we can take a look at many war stories that Tim tells and how
storytellingcan get people through the times they never thought they could. He shows
this by retelling many stories about the burdens he carries from the war throughout this
book. Burdens are heavy loads, almost like an invisible back pack we carry with us on
the inside due to intense situations we ve experienced in our... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
In the text, Tim O Brien uses, But this too is true: stories can save us, in a story, miracles
can happen (O Brien 213 224). Through this, we can infer that stories can mean
nothing to some people and mean the world to others. In a story, there might be
something said that can remind a person that even though you may have been in a
rough situation that you think you ll never be able to recover from, it is possible. I
read an article on how Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) became a problem far
beyond the battlefield. In the article, there was a section that talked about how the
soldiers come home from war and don t know how to act in the new environment from
were they ve been striving for what seemed to be forever. This can cause an unhealthy
amount of stress and uncomfortableness on the soldiers because they are going from
being with the same group of people under the same rough conditions to returning home
and having to try and settle back into a much more relaxed setting than they were used
to. This can directly be seen in the article where it says, Many soldiers will tell you that
the hardest things about coming home is learning to sleep without the security of a group
of heavily armed men around them (Junger). When the men come home and tell the
memories they have from fighting in the war, it helps them relieve what they ve been
carrying
 Essay on Ignorance in 12 Angry Men
Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of
individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the
themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes
through the characters and the dialogue. Justiceis the principle of moral rightness or
equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn t sure whether or not the boy is
actually innocent or guilty, but he persists to ask questions and convinces the other jurors
to think about the facts first. Independence is shown through both juror number three and
ten. They both believe that the defendant is guilty until they both realise that they can not
relate there past experiences with... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He says For this kid? You bet I d pull the switch juror eight then calls him a self
appointed public avenger which stuns juror number three.

Justice is the most important theme throughout this play. It proves that truth can t be
found without a struggle. In the play there was only one juror wanting to hear all the
evidence in the court case. But when more facts were found out then some of the other
jurors wanted to hear the rest of it, which would determine whether the defendant was
guilty or not guilty. No one really knew if the boy was guilty but or not but they figured
out that he was not given a fair trial. The defence barrister didn t care because he wasn t
getting paid enough money to care. So that s what the jurors thought it was up to them
then, to repay the boy with justice.

Juror number three is an arrogant, self minded and extremely ambiguous has had a
personal experience in his life, that s why he wants the boy dead. His son ran away
from a fight when he was nine. I saw him. I was so ashamed I almost threw up. Then
when he was older the boy then hit him in the face and he has never seen him since.
This puts a pre judged view inside of his head. In the end he thinks to himself that it is
not his son that is on trial therefore he can not treat him like that. He can t hate all
teenagers because of his son. Juror number ten is similar to number three in
 Socrates Reflection Paper
In 470 B.C.E Greek Philosopher, Socrates developed a theory that is supposed to clarify
how humans obtained knowledge through the soul. Through the Recollection theory,
Socrates tells and shows how human were supposedly born with non empirical
knowledge by stating how humans remembered what they past knew from re living the
experience. Therefore he claims that the soulexisted before birth, proving that the human
soul is immortal.
Socrates began to describe how humans don t obtain knowledge by learning instead, he
stated that we humans simply recollect what we already know. Our idea of a triangle,
for instance, didn t derive from sitting in a geometry class and learning about different
shapes, we simply were already born with this knowledge. He believes that humans
were already so familiar with many things/aspects of life because we already knew
about them and thus seen them, through the world of forms. He states that we
recollect by experiencing. So if we live life and experience, our knowledge will slowly
come back to us. Socrates believes that humans know what we know now because of
our souls engagement in the world of forums. Socrates then states that when the soul
connects to a body, we then depend on the body to help us recollect that obtained and
given knowledge to us by our souls. How does this process work exactly? How do we
recollect our knowledge? Well according to Socrates by simply living life. Socrates states
that there are three principal means
 Immune To Friday
People are exposed to struggles in life on a daily basis, although some individuals
experiences are more traumatic than others . The way people react to their challenges
differs with trauma as well. In Daniel Gilbert s Immune to Reality, Gilbert describes the
psychological immune system, which is a defense mechanism of the mind. The
psychological immune system is recognized as a way for the brain to find ways to
deal with the harsh realities of life. Contrastingly, Martha Stout in When I Woke Up
Tuesday Morning, It Was Friday focuses on dissociation, which is common in people
who have experienced trauma. It is similar to Gilbert s psychological immune system, as
they are both mental systems of defense, but instead of helping an individual cope with
hard times, dissociation causes complete separation of the mind from the body as an
escape from reality. Dissociation from non traumatic events is harmful to people s
psychological well being because it makes... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It causes people to lose their sense of reality, makes them miss out on important
aspects of their lives, and enables them to escape the challenges of reality rather than
facing them. Both the psychological immune system and dissociation are forms of
mental defense presented by Gilbert and Stout, respectively. They are similar because
they are both protecting an individual, but dissociation makes it impossible for one to
physically experience reality while the psychological immune system simply changes
one s perception of reality. As seen with Julia and Seth, dissociation can lead to
feelings of insanity and isolation, which is no way to live. It is harmful for one s mind
to repeatedly detach from the body in response to non harmful events because it makes
one incapable of functioning properly. It also wipes out memories, which are crucial to
who we are, how we learn, and who we connect emotionally