Professional Documents
Culture Documents
➢ The distribution of differences among the two ideas: self categorization and social
members of a unit with respect to a common identity,
attribute (Harrison & Klein, 2007). a. Self-Categorization Theory – maintains that
➢ A group characteristic that reflects the degree people categorize themselves and others
to which there are objective and/or subjective into in-group (those who are similar to them)
differences among group members (van and out-group (those who are different from
Knippenberg & Schippers, 2007) them) membership based on surface-level
➢ Simply, any difference between the members of characteristics. It is also called as the
the team. “pessimistic view” of diversity.
b. Social Identity Theory – shows that people
TYPES OF DIVERSITY derive part of their self esteem from their
• Surface-Level Diversity - characteristics that identity groups. Therefore, people tag
are noticeable when you look at someone positive characteristics in their in-group, and
“on the surface”. Ex: sex, race, age, weight negative characteristics to their out-group.
• Deep-Level Diversity - attributes that are not
immediately observable. Ex: attitude, values, • Similarity-Attraction Hypothesis - It predicts that
personality diverse teams will be less productive than
homogenous teams because homogenous
Harrison and Klein (2007) proposed that there are teams share similar attributes and are more
three distinct types of diversity: attracted to working with one another.
• Diversity as Separation - It refers to • Value in Diversity Hypothesis - It has been
differences on a particular attribute such as called as the “optimistic” view of diversity. It
attributes, beliefs and values. Ex: Cultural proposes may ways in which diversity can
Values, job attitudes, political beliefs create value for teams and how that value
• Diversity as Variety - It refers to differences in could overshadow any negative effects of
knowledge, life experiences and information team diversity, providing a competitive
among team members. Ex: Differing advantage:
Professional Background, functional areas a. Creativity argument – diversity of opinions in
and expertise. a decision-making process should de-
• Diversity as Disparity - It refers to differences emphasize conforming to norms of the past
in status or power. It could reflect the and should spur creativity.
concentration of resources including status, b. Problem-solving Argument – diverse teams
pay and the prestige of assignments among should produce better decisions via a
team members. wider range of perspectives considered
and a more thorough analysis of issues.
FAULTLINES c. Cost argument – as organizations become
➢ More recently, researchers had begun to more diverse, those are able to integrate
examine multiple forms of diversity that can diversity more smoothly will realize cost
create divisions within a team, known as advantages.
faultlines. d. Resource-acquisition argument – proposes
➢ hypothetical dividing lines which divide a that companies with a good reputation for
group into subgroups based on the being inclusive and integrating diversity
alignment of team members’ attributes. well will win with the competition for best
➢ Example: A team could have an equal talent.
number of male and female employees. e. Marketing Argument – diverse companies
Faultline on gender might exist. with a wealth of cultural information
among employees will be able to better
THEORIES ON DIVERSITY market their products in foreign markets as
• Relational Demography Theory (cited by well to domestic subgroups of the
Pfeffer, 1983) - This represents the earliest works population.
in the team diversity literature which examined f. System flexibility argument – companies
the basic characteristics of teams. This theory adopting a multicultural approach to
suggests that people compare their own managing diversity will be less rigid and
demographic characteristics with those of their more fluid, which will allow them to better
own teammates to determine whether they respond to environmental changes.
are similar or different. g. Information-processing perspective –
argues that any time there is a task
uncertainty, there is a greater amount of Introduced the idea of superordinate goals
information which must be processes to or goals that the two different groups have
accomplish a task and obtain good in common to reduce hostility and promote
performance. cooperation.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC COOPERATION GENDER STREOTYPES - Differences may also stem
AND DEVELOPMENT - an intergovernmental from gender stereotypes related to men and
economic organization with 36 member countries, women. For instance, a stereotypical assessment is
founded in 1961 to stimulate economic progress that women belong in the home while men work
and world trade, and provide support. Stereotypes often lead to sex
discrimination in the workplace.
THE GLOBAL FENDER GAP REPORT 2020
GENDER WAGE GAP - The difference between Stereotypes about male and female behavior
median earnings of men and women relative to generally involve males playing very active role,
median earnings of men. while females play a more subdued and supportive
• Wage equality for similar work has increased role.
in high income countries, while it has ✓ For example, women are generally
declined in developing countries described as nurturing, tender,
• understanding, concerned for others, kind,
helpful and sympathetic.
✓ Men, on the other hand, are generally
described as independent, decisive,
ambitious, forceful and aggressive