Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prejudice, and
Discrimination
Explain how aspects of
stereotyping, prejudice,
and discrimination have
changed dramatically in
recent years, as well as
how persistent they can
be.
• In general, stereotyping,
prejudice, and
Persistence discrimination are less
and Change acceptable than ever
before.
• But exceptions do exist.
• Racism: Prejudice and discrimination
based on a person’s background
• Sexism: Prejudice and discrimination
based on a person’s gender
• Ambivalent Sexism
Consists of two elements:
1) Hostile sexism, characterized by negative, resentful feelings
about women’s abilities, value, and challenge to men’s power (e.g.,
“Women seek special favors under the guise of equality”),
2) Benevolent sexism, characterized by affectionate, chivalrous
feelings founded on the potentially patronizing belief that women
need and deserve protection (e.g., “Women should be cherished and
protected by men”).
• Objectification
- Women are all too often treated in objectifying
ways. They are viewed or treated more as mere
Sexism: bodies or objects and less as fully functioning human
beings.
Ambivalence,
Objectification, • Sex Discrimination: Double Standards and
Pervasive Stereotypes
and Double
Standards - Studies showed that people often devalue the
performance of women who take on tasks usually
reserved for men and attribute women’s
achievements to luck rather than ability.
• Ageism—prejudice and discrimination targeting the
elderly
Beyond racism
and Sexism:
• Targeting people’s physical disabilities or
disfigurements, mental health, political ideology,
Age, Weight, economic class, being unmarried, or religion (or the
Sexuality, and lack of religious beliefs)
Other Targets • Some forms of these biases appear to be considered
more acceptable by many people: prejudice based on
weight and based on sexuality
Serious drawback: By
categorizing people, we often:
The classification of persons into
groups on the basis of common - Overestimate the differences
attributes. between groups
- Helps us form impressions - Underestimate the differences
quickly and use past experiences within groups
to guide new interactions.
• Strong tendency to divide people
How into ingroups and outgroups.
Stereotypes
Form:
• Consequences
Ingroups vs. - Exaggerate differences between
Outgroups ingroups and other outgroups
- Outgroup homogeneity effect
How Stereotypes Form
With so many well-known stereotypes and prejudices (Athletes are dumb, math majors
are geeks, Americans are loud, Italians are emotional, Californians are laid back, etc.),
many of which are shared around the world, we are somehow taught these stereotypes
from our culture (Kassin, Fein and Markus, 2017).
• Gender Stereotypes: Blue for Boys, Pink for girls
Traditionally, when a baby is born, the first words uttered are: “It’s a boy!” or
“It’s a girl!” In many hospitals, the newborn boy is immediately given a blue hat
and the newborn girl a pink hat. The infant receives a gender-appropriate name
and is showered with gender appropriate gifts (boy: toy trucks, toy guns, and
etc. ; girl: dolls, kitchen and tea sets, and etc.). However, the traditional pinks and
blues are not as distinct today as they used to be.
The following are research studies that try to answer the more general
question of whether an unarmed man is more likely to be misperceived as
holding a gun if he is black than if he is white.
Reducing the Problem: Social Psychological Solutions
• Intergroup Contact
Four conditions for contact to
succeed:
Contact Hypothesis
According to Gordon
Allport’s contact hypothesis
states that under certain
conditions, direct contact
between members of rival
groups will reduce intergroup
prejudice.
• Intergroup Friendships and Extended Contact - Building relationships across different
groups is one of the best ways to experience many of the optimal conditions for contact.
- Each student was responsible for learning one piece of the puzzle, after
which all members took turns teaching their material to one another. In this
system, everyone—regardless of race, ability, or self-confidence—needs
everyone else if the group as a whole is to succeed.
• Shared identities
-The Common Ingroup Identity Model developed by Samuel Gaertner and John Dovidio
proposes that if members of different groups recategorize themselves as members of a
more inclusive superordinate group, intergroup attitudes and relations can improve.