You are on page 1of 28

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING

NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY


RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering


PO1 fundamentals, and an engineering specialisation for the solution of complex engineering
problems.
Parameter 1. Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)

Appreciates that systems &


Can apply athematical and/or Excels in applying
processes to be designed or
scientific principles to design or mathematical and/or scientific
improved require a sound
improve systems and principles to design or improve
foundation in mathematics,
processes.Mathematical and systems and processes.
physics, chemistry, and biology.
scientific terms are interpreted Excellent interpretation of
Mathematical and scientific
Apply Mathematics correctly. Can apply mathematical, statistical, and
terms are interpreted incorrectly.
& Basic Science athematical, statistical, or scientific terms. Excels in using
Can apply mathematical,
scientific theories and concepts mathematical, statistical, or
statistical, or scientific theories
to solve problems, but with a scientific theories and concepts
and concepts to solve problems,
few errors. Modeling and to solve problems. Modeling
but errors are made. Modelling
calculations have very few and calculations are done
and calculations have 3 or more
errors. correctly.
errors.

Apply General Modelling, graphics and Modelling, graphics, and Modelling, graphics, and
Engineering calculations have 3 or more calculations have very few calculations are done correctly
knowledge errors. errors. using a variety of software.
Excels in using theories,
Can translate theories or make
making realistic assumptions
realistic assumptions to develop
Makes unrealistic assumptions to and developing good models of
models of systems and
develop models of system and systems and processes. Accepts
processes. Knows the difference
process. Knows the difference limitations of IE &
Apply IE(Industrial between a system and a model
between a system and a model of mathematical models of
Engineering) of that system, but is not very
that system , but cannot validate systems and processes &
Fundamental good at model validation
models. Can apply statistical establishes validity of models
concepts approaches. Can apply
techniques to model, study, before using them to make
statistical techniques to model,
analyse, design, or improve decisions. Excels in applying
study, analyze, design, or
systems , but makes many errors. statistical techniques to model,
improve systems with very few
study, analyse, design, or
errors.
improve systems.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, research literature, and analyze complex engineering problems reaching
PO2
substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences, and engineering sciences.

Parameter 1. Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)

Fair in locating resources, integrating Good at locating resources, integrating Excellent in locating resources ,
knowledge and experience , and knowledge and experience, and integrating knowledge and experience,
Strategy
formulating a good strategy to solve formulating a good strategy to solve and formulating a good strategy to solve
engineering problems. engineering problems. engineering problems.

Good at multiple tools, techniques, and


Fair use of multiple tools, techniques, and Excels in multiple tools, techniques, and
software for analyzing existing systems
software for analysing existing systems software for analyzing existing systems
and solving problems. Good in
Tools Used and solving problems. Fair in applying and solving problems. Excels at applying
applying multiple tools to solve
multiple tools to solve problems related to multiple tools to solve problems related
problems related to synthesis of new
synthesis of new systems. to synthesis of new systems.
systems.

Can breakdown complex problems into


Can breakdown complex problems into Can breakdown complex problems into
sub problems and apply theoretical
sub problems and apply theoretical sub problems and apply theoretical
concepts, but makes a few errors.
concepts, but makes many errors. Needs concepts. Understands how various
Knows how various pieces of the large
to be shown how various pieces of the pieces of the large problem relate to each
Solution and problem relate to each other and the
large problem relate to each other and the other and the whole system. Excels in
Approach whole system, but makes a few errors.
whole system. Needs help in taking into taking into account practical constraints
Good at taking into account practical
account practical constraints (social, (social, environmental, and other).
constraints (social, environmental, and
environmental, and other). Can generate Generates many alternatives and
other ). Generates very few alter
one alternative only or needs some help. compares them.
natives and compare them.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems


and design system components
P03: or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for public
health and safety, and cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Subsmntial (High)

Develops a design strategy,


Develops a design strategr including a plan of attack,
Recognizes the need for
independently with a few decomposition of work into
a design strategy , but
Design Strategy errors. May need correction or subtasks, and development of a
needs an example and
some aspects need timeline using Gantt chart. No
guidance.
embellishments. changes needed to the developed
strategy.

Fair in applying
Applying Good at applying engineering Excellent in applying engineering
engineering and/or
Engineering and/or scientific principles and/or scientific principles
scientific principles
and correctly to design practical correctly to design practical
correctly to design
Science components, processes, or components, processes, or
practical components,
Knowledge systems. systems.
processes, or systems.

Realizes that there are


economic, safety, Takes into account economic,
Constraints Some constraints are not taken
environmental, and other safety, environmental, and other
Identified and into account in designing
constraints, but needs constraints to generate realistic
taken into components, processes, or
help to generate realistic designs that customers will
Account systems.
designs that customers prefer.
will prefer.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and


PO4: research methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data,
and synthesis of the information to provide valid conclusions.
Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
Understands the system, Excellent knowledge of
Problem Understands the system, inputs,
inputs, outputs, and noise system, inputs, outputs,
Recognition outputs, and noise factors. Can
factors. noise factors, etc. Uses that
and develop problem statement, but
Can develop problem knowledge to define
Statement critical information is left out.
statement satisfactorily. problem clearly.
Not only chooses models
Can choose the model, but needs Can choose model
correctly, but also knows
Choice of reassurance from a mentor. correctly and confidently.
how to improve the model
DOE Model Can recognize controllable noise Applies blocking where
through sequential
factors and use blocking. necessary.
experiments.

Determines the need for Excellent knowledge of


Knows the difference between
repetition or replication, repetition or replication.
repetition and replication, but
calculates sample size, Knows many methods to
Perform needs reassurance.
conducts experiments calculate sample size.
Experiments Can determine ample size, but
confidently, and collects Plans, organizes, & conducts
needs reassurance and help with
data in an organized experiments well.
experiments and collection of data.
manner. Uses dat collection forms.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and
PO5: modern engineering and IT tools, including prediction and modeling to complex
engineering activities, with an understanding of the limitations.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)

Apply Good at applying Very good at applying Excellent in applying


Operations deterministic models. deterministic models. Very deterministic models.
Research Good at applying good at applying Excellent in applying
Models and Markov processes and Markov processes and queuing Markov processes and queuing
Techniques queuing models. models. models.

Apply Work
Good at applying work Very good at applying work Excellent in applying work
Measurement
measurement techniques. measurement techniques. measurement techniques.
Techniques
Problem Def., Good in problem Very good in problem
Excellent in problem definition,
Soln. Strategy, definition, solution, definition, solution, strategy ,
solution, strategy, and research.
& Research strategy, and research. and research.
TeamSkills,
Good team and Very good team and Excellent team and
Pres.,
communication skills. communication skills. communication skills.
& Comm.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to
P06: assess societal, health, safety, legal, and cultural issues and the consequent
responsibilities relevant to the professional engineering practice.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)

Services to Has demonstrated dedicated


Not a member, but will become Member now and may be
Profession leadership roles on campus
a member and try to be active. active in the future.
and Society and may continue in future.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering


P07: solutions in societal and environmental contexts/and demonstrate the knowledge of,
and need for sustainable development.
Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
Has a good knowledge Has a very good knowledge of
Has excellent knowledge of
of 1 or more international 1 or more international
3 or more international standards
standards that can alleviate the standards that can alleviate the
Understanding of that can alleviate the adverse
adverse impact of engineering adverse impact of engineering
Impact of impact of engineering solutions in
solutions in global and societal solutions in global and societal
Engineering global and societal context . Can
context. Will use a strategy for context. Understands the need
Solutions in implement a strategy for
harmonizing standards and for a strategy for harmonizing
Global and harmonizing standards and
management systems for standards and management
societal Context management systems for quality,
quality, environment, social systems for quality,
environment, social responsibility,
responsibility, etc., if details are environment, social
etc.
provided. responsibility, etc.
Will locate resources Excels in locating resources
Familiarity with Good at locating resources
(libraries, websites, journals, (libraries, websites, journals,
Applications of IE (libraries, websites, journals,
magazines, etc) on 2 or more magazines, etc) on 2 or
Tools, Methods magazines, etc) on 2 or more
applications when necessary. more applications. Has acquired
& Techniques in applications. Has acquired and
Will read papers from one of and read more than one paper from
Global and read one paper from one of the
the above resources only when one of the
Societal Context above resources.
a need arises. above resources.
Needs examples and Is familiar with at least one Is familiar with at least two specific
Breath and Depth instructions for applying IE specific IE method applied to IE methods applied to analyze
of the Impact of methods to analyze global and analyze global and social global and social issues.
Engineering social issues. issues. Has reviewed and Has reviewed and written a report
Solutions in Will review and write a report written a report on one specific on Neo or more specific IE
Global and on specific IE methods applied IE method applied to analyze methods applied to analyze global
Societal Context to analyze global and social global and social and social
issues when required. issues. issues.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms
P08:
of the engineering practice.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)

Knows where to access code of Knows where to access code of


ethics of at least 1 professional ethics of 2 or more Professional
Knowledge of Knows about the code of ethics of a
society. Has read and societies.
Professional society, and will access and use them
demonstrated adequate Has read and demonstrated
Code of Ethics when ethical problems are faced.
knowledge of at least one excellent knowledge of at least
professional code of ethics. one professional code of ethics.

Can apply at least 1 code of Can apply the code of ethics


Ability to Will learn to apply the code of ethics
ethics from a professional from professional societies
Recognize from professional societies and/or
society and/or ethical theory to and/or ethical theories to
Ethical ethical theories to recognize ethical
recognize ethical dilemmas and recognize ethical dilemmas and
Dilemmas dilemmas when necessary.
analyze them. analyze them in many ways.
Has demonstrated good ability Has demonstrated excellent
Analyze Ethical Has ability to analyze ethical problems
to analyze ethical problems in ability to analyze ethical
Problems in IE in IE work through case studies, but is
IE work through case studies. problems in IE work through
Work and not interested. Has generated fair
Has generated good solutions case studies. Has generated
Make solutions and made fair decisions in the
and made good decisions in the excellent solutions and made
Decisions IE field.
IE field. sound decisions in the IE field.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual,


P09: and as a member or leader in diverse teams, and in
multidisciplinary settings.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)

Organized. Will
Needs prompting from team leader
assume team member
to be organized and keep track of Well organized. Has many abilities
roles most of the time.
assigned work and due dates. and volunteers to do team work
Tardy a few times.
May be tardy sometimes. Never tardy.
Take Shares information
Shares information & experience Shares information & experience
Responsibility & experience most
sometimes. always.
of the time. Remembers
Must be assigned work and due date, Writes assignments and deadlines.
work to be done and due
but will not share work and Delivers work on time.
dates, but may forget
responsibility.
a few.

Will do research and gather Will do research and gather


information and data if reminded information and data if Has the initiative to do research,
often. requested. Will provide provides innovative ideas,
Contribution to Will provide innovative ideas, innovative ideas, generate generates creative solutions, and
Team generate creative solutions, and creative solutions, and generate generates good alternative
Effort & Work generate good alternative solutions if good alternative solutions if solutions.
reminded often. prompted. Always prepared for team
Not prepared for team meetings Not prepared for team meetings meetings.
sometimes. once or twice.

Courteous and
Usually courteous to all. Nonjudgmental always.
Courteous to all sometimes.
Provides positive feedback when Participates in discussions,
Provides positive feedback
Respect, Civility, necessary. Values others respects colleagues, makes
sometimes. Values others'
Communication viewpoints almost always. Has significant contributions while
viewpoints sometimes. Listening
good listening skills, attention discussing others' work, values
skills need improvement.
fades occasionally. others' viewpoints, & functions
effectively as a team member.

Does not have


knowledge of technical Has elementary knowledge of
Has very good knowledge of
skills, issues, and technical skills, issues, and
Knowledge of other technical skills, issues, and
approaches germane approacties germane to
Disciplines approaches germane
to disciplines outside disciplines outside of IE, but
to disciplines outside of IE.
of IE, but will acquire will augment when needed.
them when needed.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities


with the engineering community and with t h e society at large, such as, being
PO10:
able to comprehend and write effective reports and design documentation,
make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)


Oral
Communication presentation due to erratic topical shifts Most information is presented in presented in a logical, interesting and
Organization & and jumps. logical order and is easy to follow. novel sequence and is easy to follow.
Structure

Oral Occasional mispronunciation of terms. Voice is clear and at a proper level.


Clear voice and correct pronunciation
Communication Uses appropriate vocabulary. Little eye Most words pronounced correctly.
of terms. Good eye contact, steady rate,
Delivery & contact, uneven rate, or only little Some eye contact, steady rate, and
enthusiasm, or confidence.
Speaking Skills expression. adequately rehearsed.

Oral
Communication Appearance marginally acceptable. Appearance is good.
Appearance is professional.
Personal Responds to questions and comments, Responds to questions and
Responds to questions and comments
Appearance & but is not at ease or confident. Length is comments well. Length is
confidently. Length is appropriate.
Rapport with adequate. acceptable.
Audience
Information is presented in a
Written Work is hard to follow as there is very presented in a logical, interesting way,
logical manner, which is easily
Communication little continuity. which is easy to follow. Purpose is
followed. purpose of work is
Organization & Purpose Of work is stated, but does not clearly stated and explains the structure
clearly stated and assists the
Style assistin following work. of work.
structure of work.
Format is generally consistent
Written Format is consistent throughout
Mostly consistent format. including heading styles and
Communication including heading styles and captions.
Figures and tables are legible, but not captions.
Format & Figures and tables are presented
convincing. Figures and tables are neatly done
Aesthetics logically and reinforce the text.
and provide intended information.
Written
Minor misspellings and/or Negligible misspellings and/or
Communication Several spelling and grammatical errors.
grammatical errors. grammatical errors.
Spelling &
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding


oft h e engineering and management principles andapply these to one's own
PO11:
work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects and in
multidisciplinary environments.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)

Knowledge of Good knowledge of job Excellent knowledge ofjob market


Poor knowledge of job market and relies on
Job market and is building a and has an excellent network to seek
the Placement Services.
Market network to seek information. information.

Has a good basis for


Planning Has sound basis for preparing yearly
Has some ides of personal budget, savings & preparing yearly personal
Budget, Insurance, & personal budget showing all costs,
investment, but is not concerned. budget showing all costs,
Investment, savings, and investment
savings, and investment
Ability to
Engage in
Reads newspaper or Reads newspaper and current
Conversation about
Plans to read newspaper or magazines in magazines randomly. Uses magazines on a regular basis.
Political,
future. Plans to use the Web to keep current. the Web to keep current Uses the Web to keep current daily.
Economic,
Makes minor contributions to discussions. randomly. Does contribute to Can make substantial contribution to
National, Regional, and
discussions. discussions.
international
Events or Issues
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING PO'S

Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage
PO12:
in independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological Change.

Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)


Uses all web resources when
Ability to Locate and Uses limited resources at websites dealing Uses websites listed by instructor and does
URLs are provided and attempts
Use with IE topics when the URLs are extensive search to locate and use more
to locate and use a few
Resources on the Web provided. than 5 other sources.
additional web resources.
Has good plan and demonstrated
Has fair plan and demonstrated ability for Has excellent plan and demonstrated ability
Ability to Locate ability for life-long learning.
life-long learning. Has fair ability to think, for life-long learning. Has excellent ability
& Learn from Recent Has good ability to think, learn
learn from mistakes, and apply new to think, learn from mistakes, and apply
Publications IE from mistakes, and apply new
concepts. new concepts.
concepts.
Member of 1 Professional
Plans to be a member in 1 professional Member of 2 or more Professional society.
society. Has leadership role in 1
society. Does not have leadership role in Has leadership role in 2 or more
Familiarity with professional society on campus.
professional or other societies on campus. professional or other societies on campus.
Services Provided Knows that the website for the
Will seek courses or resources available Aware of courses on the current topics and
Professional society lists courses on current
from societies when needed. May use resources available at the website for the
Societies topics and resources available.
some services provided by the society in society. Has used 2 or more services
Has used a magazine or book
the future. provided by a professional society.
from a professional society.

Has demonstrated excellent ability to


Ability to Use Has demonstrated very good
Has demonstrated fair ability to acquire acquire books
Reference Books, ability to acquire books and
books and journal articles, understand, and journal articles, understand, interpret,
Books, Periodicals, journal articles,
interpret, and apply current, new, or and
and Archives, & understand, interpret, and apply
innovative concepts in IE and related apply current, new, or innovative concepts
Inter- Library Loans current, new, or innovative
fields. in
in Libraries concepts in IE and related fields.
IE and related fields.
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING POs/PSOs (B. Tech. in CSE)
The ability to understand, illustrate, discuss, explain the fundamental design
and working principle of any existing or new computing model or concept
PSO1: related to the field of computer science and engineering and analyze the
utility of the model or concept in respect of its capability of addressing and
solving the relevant issues or problems.
Parameter 2: Moderate
1: Slight (Low) 3: Substantial (High)
(Medium)
The ability to understand,
illustrate, discuss, explain If No. of students able to adapt
If less than 50% of If 50%<= No. of
the fundamental design existing models, techniques,
students are able to students able to adapt
and working principle of algorithms, data structures to
adapt existing existing models,
any existing or new write a substantial technical
models, techniques, techniques,
computing modelor report/document is >=75%
algorithms, data algorithms, data
concept related to the field
structures structures <75%
of computer science and
engineering
Analyze the utility of the
model or concept in If less than 50% of If 50%<= No. of If No. of students able to
respect of its capability of students are able to students able to efficiently solve
addressing and solving the efficiently solve efficiently solve problems>=75%
relevant issues or problems problems<75%
problems.

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING


NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING POs/PSOs (B. Tech. in CSE)
The ability to identify and formulate a problem within the scope of computer
science and engineering domain for proposing software application-based or
PSO2:
research-based solution models with adequate justification by applying the
relevant domain knowledge.
Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
Ability to identify and
If less than 50% of If 50%<= No. of students
formulate a problem If No. of students able to
students are able to write able to write a substantial
within the scope of write a substantial technical
a substantial technical technical report/document
computer science and report/document is >=75%
report/document <75%
engineering domain

Applying the relevant


domain knowledge
If less than 50% of
while proposing If 50%<= No. of students If No. of students able to
students are able to
software application- able to present a present a substantial
present a substantial
based or research- substantial technical technical report/document is
technical
based solution models report/document <75% >=75%
report/document
with adequate
justification
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
NARULA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
RUBRICS FOR VALIDATING POs/PSOs (B. Tech. in CSE)
The ability to ideate, design, implements and analyze a solution proposal
with proper documentation demonstrating adequate software engineering
management skill along with the necessary technical skill for driving
PSO3: propensity towards technological innovation boosted with research and
entrepreneurial aptitude for producing globally competent engineering
professionals capable of making meaningful contributions in the field of
computer science and engineering.
Parameter 1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
The ability to ideate,
design, implements and
If less than 50% of
analyze a solution If 50%<= No. of students If No. of students able to
students are able to
proposal with proper able to write a write a substantial
write a substantial
documentation substantial technical technical report/document
technical
demonstrating adequate report/document <75% is >=75%
report/document
software engineering
management skill
Capable of producing
globally competent If less than 50% of
If 50%<= No. of students If No. of students able to
engineering professionals students are able to
able to present a present a substantial
capable of making present a substantial
substantial technical technical report/document
meaningful contributions technical
report/document <75% is >=75%
in the field of computer report/document
science and engineering.
RUBRICS FOLLOWED TO EVALUATE THE LAB COURSES
1. Attendance (5)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Attendance 5 The student has The student has More than 85% of
attended less than attended 75% to total classes have
75% of the total 85% of the total been attended by the
number of classes. number of classes. student.

0 1-3 marks 4-5 marks

2. Continuous performance (10)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Continuous 10 The student has not The student has The student has
performance performed anything given satisfactory given excellent
during laboratory performance during performance or has
periods laboratory periods completed all the
tasks given during
laboratory periods.

0 1-7 marks 8-10 marks

3. Laboratory reports (15)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Laboratory reports 15 The student has not The lab copy was The lab report
submitted a submitted but was submitted was
laboratory report incomplete Complete
before the semester
examination

0 1-12 marks 13-15 marks

4. Initiative and intensity to learn (10)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Initiative and 10 Students have Initiatives taken by Initiatives taken by


intensity to learn shown no interest or the students were the students have
initiative to learn satisfactory helped them to
anything during complete all the
laboratory periods tasks on time

0 1-7 marks 8-10 marks

5. Experiment (40):

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Experiment 40 The student was The student was The student was
not able to partially able to able to perform
perform the job, perform the job the job
given during the during the accurately
semester semester during the
laboratory laboratory semester
examination examination laboratory
examination

0 1-30 marks 30-40 marks

6. Viva-voce (20)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Viva-voce 20 The student was The student was The student was
not able to able to answer a able to answer
answer anything few questions all the questions
during viva-voce during viva-voce during viva-
voce

0 1-15 marks 16-20 marks

Level 1: Continuous Evaluation in every lab session (10 marks)


The Continuous Evaluation is done by the faculty in every lab session for 10 marks based on
rubrics defined in the table and the average marks of all sessions will be considered for awarding
final internal assessment marks.
Students shall carry out laboratory work and are encouraged to use modern tools, available in
the lab for executing the experiments. It is also supported with a designed manual developed by
the faculty and staff. The students are expected to submit the assignments in a prescribed
timeline and demonstrate the same to faculty. This is documented in laboratory copy.
Parameter Allocated LOW MEDIUM HIGH
Marks

Viva-voce 2 The student did not The student answered few viva The student
answer any questions asked answered all viva
viva questions questions asked
asked

0 mark 1 mark 02 marks

Lab 8 The lab copy was The lab copy was submitted in Completed lab
copywriting not submitted in the lab session but was copy was
the lab session incomplete submitted in the
lab session

0 mark 1-4 marks 5-8 marks

Level 2: Open Ended Experiment (10 marks)

For B.Tech students, Open Ended Experiment was conducted and evaluated for 10 marks. The
below noted Table shows the Rubric for Assessment of Open Ended Lab Experiment for
students.
Parameter Allocated LOW MEDIUM HIGH
Marks

Background 02 Sufficient study and Adequate study and Thorough study


Knowledge half of the questions more than half of the and all the
have been answered questions have been questions have
correctly. answered correctly. been answered
correctly.

0 marks 1 mark 2 marks

Design 06 Inappropriate Design Design


documentation is
Design and contains documentation is appropriately
few technical errors. appropriately detailed detailed and
and structured for the structured for the
intended Purpose with intended Purpose.
less information

0 marks 4 marks 6 marks


Logic 02 Significant findings are Significant Significant findings
Construction summarized. findings are are summarized.
Acceptable conclusion. summarized. Precisely
Acceptable suggestion Good conclusion. concluded.
for further research. Good suggestion Excellent
for further suggestion for
research. further research

0 marks 1 mark 2 marks

Documentation 02 The requirements of Document meets Document meets


document writing are all prescribed all requirements
not properly requirements. and it is prepared
addressed. in original and
creative way to
engage readers.

0 marks 1 mark 2 marks

Level 3: Lab Internal


The Lab Internals are conducted as per the prescribed guidelines given below. The Evaluation
is carried out based on the rubrics defined in the below noted table.

Parameter Allocated LOW MEDIUM HIGH


Marks

Question 06 The Student was not The Student was The Student was
Write-up able to write able to write able to write
anything with mistakes correctly

0 marks 2-4 marks 6 marks

Execution of 10 The Student was not The Student was The Student was able
job able to perform the partially able to to perform the job
job perform the job accurately

0 marks 3-6 marks 10 marks

Viva-voce 04 The student did not The student answered The student answered
answered any viva - few viva- voce asked all viva- voce questions
voce asked asked

0 marks 2 marks 4 marks


RUBRICS FOLLOWED TO EVALUATE SEMINAR

Department of Computer Science and Engineering


Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name:-
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Mark Marks
Indicator Inadequate(1) Average (2) Good (3) Outstanding(4) Weightage
Selected Obtained
Information
Hard to Information
Most of presented as
Organization follow; presented in
information interesting story
of sequence of logical 3
presented in in logical, easy
presentation information sequence;
sequence to follow
jumpy easy to follow
sequence
Material Material Material
Material not
sufficient for sufficient for sufficient for
clearly related
clear clear clear
Background to topic OR
understanding understanding understanding 3
content background
but not AND AND
dominated
clearly effectively exceptionally
seminar
presented presented presented
Knowledge and Content

Methods too
brief or Sufficient for Sufficient for Sufficient for
insufficient for understanding understanding understanding
Methods adequate but not AND AND 3
understanding clearly effectively exceptionally
OR too presented presented presented
detailed
Some figures Majority of Most figures
All figures clear
hard to read figures clear clear
Results Some in Majority Most All
(figures, inappropriate appropriately appropriately appropriately
3
graphs, format formatted formatted formatted
tables, etc.) Some
Reasonably Well Exceptionally
explanations
explained explained explained
lacking
Does not have
At ease with At ease; Demonstrated
grasp of
information; answered all full knowledge;
Knowledge information;
answered questions but answered all 3
of subject answered only
most failed to questions with
rudimentary
questions elaborate elaboration
questions
Uses graphics Uses graphics
Uses graphics Uses graphics
Graphics that rarely that explain and
Presentation Skills

that relate to that explain


(use of support text reinforce text 2
text and text and
Powerpoint) and and
presentation presentation
presentation presentation
Presentation Presentation Presentation
Presentation
has more than has no more has no more
Mechanics has no 2
10 than 5 than 2
misspellings or
misspellings misspellings misspellings
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name:-
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Mark Marks
Indicator Inadequate(1) Average (2) Good (3) Outstanding(4) Weightage
Selected Obtained
and/or and/or and/or grammatical
grammatical grammatical grammatical errors
errors errors errors

Refers to
Refers to
Reads most slides to Refers to slides
slides to
slides; no or make points; to make points;
Eye Contact make points; 2
just occasional eye contact engaged with
occasional
eye contact. majority of audience
eye contact
time contact
Incorrectly
Incorrectly
Mumbles pronounces Correct, precise
pronounces
and/or few terms pronunciation
Elocution - some terms
incorrectly Voice is clear of all terms
ability to Voice
pronounces with few Voice is clear
speak fluctuates 2
some terms fluctuations; and steady;
English from low to
Voice is low; audience can audience can
language clear;
difficult to hear well hear well at all
difficult to
hear most of the times
hear at times
time
Short; less Short 40 min Adequate 40-
Appropriate
than 30 min OR long >50 45 min Most
Length and (45-50 min)
Rushed OR Rushed OR of the 2
Pace Well-paced
dragging dragging in seminar well-
throughout
throughout. part paced.
RUBRICS FOLLOWED TO EVALUATE PROJECT

Department of Computer Science and Engineering


Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name: -
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Indicator Poor (2) Acceptable(4) Average (6) Good (8) Excellent (10) Mark Weigh Marks
Selec tage Obtain
ted ed
Basic
planning and Planning and
Exhibits a
Little planning time time
Procrastination professional
Planning & or forethought management management
lead to level of
time Project hastily needs exhibited 1
incomplete planning and
management completed for necessary enhance the
project time
deadline for project overall
management
completion project
met
Detailed and
Average
Identification of Minimal Moderate Good extensive
explanation
Problem explanation of explanation of explanation explanation
of the
Domain and the purpose the purpose of the purpose of the 1
purpose and
Detailed and the need and the need of and the need purpose and
the need of
Analysis of the project the project of the project need of the
the project
project
Explanation of
Minimal
the Detailed and
Explanation of
Specifications Moderate Collects a extensive
Study of the the
and the study of the great deal of explanation of
Existing Specifications
limitations of existing information the
Systems and and the
the existing systems; and good specifications 1
Feasibility of limitation sof
system not collects study of the and the
the Project the existing
very some basic existing limitations of
Proposal system;
satisfactory; information systems; the existing
incomplete
Limited systems
Information.
Information.
Only Some Incomplete All objectives
Good
Objectives of objectives of justification of the
justification
the proposed the proposed to the proposed work
to the
work are either work are well objectives are well
Objectives and objectives;
not identified defined; Steps proposed; defined; Steps
Methodology of Methodology
or not well to be followed Steps are to be followed 1
the Proposed to be
defined; to solve the mentioned to solve the
Work followed is
Incomplete defined but unclear; defined
specified but
and improper problem are without problem are
detailing is
specification not specified justification clearly
not done
properly to objectives specified
No objectives Objectives not Objectives Objectives Objectives
Demonstrations
achieved; achieved as per achieved as achieved as achieved as
and 1
Contents of time frame; per time per time per time
Presentation
presentations Contents frame; frame; frame;
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name: -
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Indicator Poor (2) Acceptable(4) Average (6) Good (8) Excellent (10) Mark Weigh Marks
Selec tage Obtain
ted ed
are not of Contents of Contents of Contents of
appropriate presentation ns presentations presentations presentations
and not well are not are are are appropriate
delivered; appropriate; appropriate appropriate and well
Poor Eye contact but not well but not well arranged;
delivery with few arranged; arranged; Proper eye
of presentation people and Presentation Satisfactory contact with
unclear voice not demonstration audience and
satisfactory , clear voice clear voice
and average with good with good
demonstratio spoken spoken
n language but language
eye contact
not proper
Changes Changes are
All major
are made as made as per
changes are
Suggestions Few changes per modifications
made
during are made as per modifications suggested
as per
Incorporation midterm modifications suggested during
modification 0.5
of Suggestions evaluation are suggested during midterm
s suggested
not during midterm midterm evaluation and
during
incorporated evaluation evaluation new
midterm
and good innovations
evaluation
justification added
Project report
Project is according
Project report Project report
Project report report is to the
not prepared is according to
is not fully according to specified
according to the specified
according to the specified format;
the specified format;
the specified format but References
Project Report format; References 0.5
format; In- some and citations
References and citations
sufficient mistakes; In- are
and citations are appropriate
references and sufficient appropriate
are not and well
citations references but not
appropriate mentioned
and citations mentioned
well
RUBRICS FOLLOWED TO EVALUATE THE LAB COURSES
1. Attendance (5)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Attendance 5 The student has The student has More than 85% of
attended less than attended 75% to total classes have
75% of the total 85% of the total been attended by the
number of classes. number of classes. student.

0 1-3 marks 4-5 marks

2. Continuous performance (10)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Continuous 10 The student has not The student has The student has
performance performed anything given satisfactory given excellent
during laboratory performance during performance or has
periods laboratory periods completed all the
tasks given during
laboratory periods.

0 1-7 marks 8-10 marks

3. Laboratory reports (15)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Laboratory reports 15 The student has not The lab copy was The lab report
submitted a submitted but was submitted was
laboratory report incomplete Complete
before the semester
examination

0 1-12 marks 13-15 marks

4. Initiative and intensity to learn (10)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Initiative and 10 Students have Initiatives taken by Initiatives taken by


intensity to learn shown no interest or the students were the students have
initiative to learn satisfactory helped them to
anything during complete all the
laboratory periods tasks on time

0 1-7 marks 8-10 marks

5. Experiment (40):

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Experiment 40 The student was The student was The student was
not able to partially able to able to perform
perform the job, perform the job the job
given during the during the accurately
semester semester during the
laboratory laboratory semester
examination examination laboratory
examination

0 1-30 marks 30-40 marks

6. Viva-voce (20)

Parameter Allocated marks Low Medium High

Viva-voce 20 The student was The student was The student was
not able to able to answer a able to answer
answer anything few questions all the questions
during viva-voce during viva-voce during viva-
voce

0 1-15 marks 16-20 marks


RUBRICS FOLLOWED TO EVALUATE SEMINAR

Department of Computer Science and Engineering


Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name:-
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Mark Marks
Indicator Inadequate(1) Average (2) Good (3) Outstanding(4) Weightage
Selected Obtained
Information
Hard to Information
Most of presented as
Organization follow; presented in
information interesting story
of sequence of logical 3
presented in in logical, easy
presentation information sequence;
sequence to follow
jumpy easy to follow
sequence
Material Material Material
Material not
sufficient for sufficient for sufficient for
clearly related
clear clear clear
Background to topic OR
understanding understanding understanding 3
content background
but not AND AND
dominated
clearly effectively exceptionally
seminar
presented presented presented
Knowledge and Content

Methods too
brief or Sufficient for Sufficient for Sufficient for
insufficient for understanding understanding understanding
Methods adequate but not AND AND 3
understanding clearly effectively exceptionally
OR too presented presented presented
detailed
Some figures Majority of Most figures
All figures clear
hard to read figures clear clear
Results Some in Majority Most All
(figures, inappropriate appropriately appropriately appropriately
3
graphs, format formatted formatted formatted
tables, etc.) Some
Reasonably Well Exceptionally
explanations
explained explained explained
lacking
Does not have
At ease with At ease; Demonstrated
grasp of
information; answered all full knowledge;
Knowledge information;
answered questions but answered all 3
of subject answered only
most failed to questions with
rudimentary
questions elaborate elaboration
questions
Uses graphics Uses graphics
Uses graphics Uses graphics
Graphics that rarely that explain and
Presentation Skills

that relate to that explain


(use of support text reinforce text 2
text and text and
Powerpoint) and and
presentation presentation
presentation presentation
Presentation Presentation Presentation
Presentation
has more than has no more has no more
Mechanics has no 2
10 than 5 than 2
misspellings or
misspellings misspellings misspellings
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name:-
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Mark Marks
Indicator Inadequate(1) Average (2) Good (3) Outstanding(4) Weightage
Selected Obtained
and/or and/or and/or grammatical
grammatical grammatical grammatical errors
errors errors errors

Refers to
Refers to
Reads most slides to Refers to slides
slides to
slides; no or make points; to make points;
Eye Contact make points; 2
just occasional eye contact engaged with
occasional
eye contact. majority of audience
eye contact
time contact
Incorrectly
Incorrectly
Mumbles pronounces Correct, precise
pronounces
and/or few terms pronunciation
Elocution - some terms
incorrectly Voice is clear of all terms
ability to Voice
pronounces with few Voice is clear
speak fluctuates 2
some terms fluctuations; and steady;
English from low to
Voice is low; audience can audience can
language clear;
difficult to hear well hear well at all
difficult to
hear most of the times
hear at times
time
Short; less Short 40 min Adequate 40-
Appropriate
than 30 min OR long >50 45 min Most
Length and (45-50 min)
Rushed OR Rushed OR of the 2
Pace Well-paced
dragging dragging in seminar well-
throughout
throughout. part paced.
RUBRICS FOLLOWED TO EVALUATE PROJECT

Department of Computer Science and Engineering


Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name: -
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Indicator Poor (2) Acceptable(4) Average (6) Good (8) Excellent (10) Mark Weigh Marks
Selec tage Obtain
ted ed
Basic
planning and Planning and
Exhibits a
Little planning time time
Procrastination professional
Planning & or forethought management management
lead to level of
time Project hastily needs exhibited 1
incomplete planning and
management completed for necessary enhance the
project time
deadline for project overall
management
completion project
met
Detailed and
Average
Identification of Minimal Moderate Good extensive
explanation
Problem explanation of explanation of explanation explanation
of the
Domain and the purpose the purpose of the purpose of the 1
purpose and
Detailed and the need and the need of and the need purpose and
the need of
Analysis of the project the project of the project need of the
the project
project
Explanation of
Minimal
the Detailed and
Explanation of
Specifications Moderate Collects a extensive
Study of the the
and the study of the great deal of explanation of
Existing Specifications
limitations of existing information the
Systems and and the
the existing systems; and good specifications 1
Feasibility of limitation sof
system not collects study of the and the
the Project the existing
very some basic existing limitations of
Proposal system;
satisfactory; information systems; the existing
incomplete
Limited systems
Information.
Information.
Only Some Incomplete All objectives
Good
Objectives of objectives of justification of the
justification
the proposed the proposed to the proposed work
to the
work are either work are well objectives are well
Objectives and objectives;
not identified defined; Steps proposed; defined; Steps
Methodology of Methodology
or not well to be followed Steps are to be followed 1
the Proposed to be
defined; to solve the mentioned to solve the
Work followed is
Incomplete defined but unclear; defined
specified but
and improper problem are without problem are
detailing is
specification not specified justification clearly
not done
properly to objectives specified
No objectives Objectives not Objectives Objectives Objectives
Demonstrations
achieved; achieved as per achieved as achieved as achieved as
and 1
Contents of time frame; per time per time per time
Presentation
presentations Contents frame; frame; frame;
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Narula Institute of Technology
Academic Session:- Year: - Name: -
Roll No.:- Paper code:-
Indicator Poor (2) Acceptable(4) Average (6) Good (8) Excellent (10) Mark Weigh Marks
Selec tage Obtain
ted ed
are not of Contents of Contents of Contents of
appropriate presentation ns presentations presentations presentations
and not well are not are are are appropriate
delivered; appropriate; appropriate appropriate and well
Poor Eye contact but not well but not well arranged;
delivery with few arranged; arranged; Proper eye
of presentation people and Presentation Satisfactory contact with
unclear voice not demonstration audience and
satisfactory , clear voice clear voice
and average with good with good
demonstratio spoken spoken
n language but language
eye contact
not proper
Changes Changes are
All major
are made as made as per
changes are
Suggestions Few changes per modifications
made
during are made as per modifications suggested
as per
Incorporation midterm modifications suggested during
modification 0.5
of Suggestions evaluation are suggested during midterm
s suggested
not during midterm midterm evaluation and
during
incorporated evaluation evaluation new
midterm
and good innovations
evaluation
justification added
Project report
Project is according
Project report Project report
Project report report is to the
not prepared is according to
is not fully according to specified
according to the specified
according to the specified format;
the specified format;
the specified format but References
Project Report format; References 0.5
format; In- some and citations
References and citations
sufficient mistakes; In- are
and citations are appropriate
references and sufficient appropriate
are not and well
citations references but not
appropriate mentioned
and citations mentioned
well

You might also like