Result and Analysis

In order to find the results of our survey, multiple calculations were conducted, and the
calculations are as follows-

Correlations
Constructs 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
SV 1
TI .278** 1
TS .181 .332* 1
AT .127 -.017 .076 1
FD .271* .316* .334** -.167 1
JR .070 -.176 -.137 .038 .014 1
JER -.077 .135 -.210 .119 -.347** .043 1
JE .131 -.111 .172 -.176 .232 .204 .129 1
WB .138 .071 .063 .467** -.121 -.141 .067 -.121 1
JS .250 .434** .314 .313 .546** -.133 -.217 -.069 -.044 1

Table 1.1

Correlations helps to understand the strength and direction of the relationships between
the dependent variable and the independent variables. Table 1.1 shows the correlations
between the constructs.

Model Summary

Adjusted R Std. Error of the

Model R R Square Square Estimate

1 .821a .674 .590 .81729

a. Predictors: (Constant), WB, TI1, JER, JE1, JR, TS1, AT2, TS2, TI2,
FD1, FD2, AT1

Table 1.2

The r-square value in the table 1.2 clearly indicates that the variables that has been
selected in this study, represent 67.4% of all the variables that influences Job Satisfaction.
 ANOVAb

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1 Regression 64.789 12 5.399 8.083 .000a

Residual 31.394 47 .668

Total 96.183 59

a. Predictors: (Constant), WB, TI1, JER, JE1, JR, TS1, AT2, TS2, TI2, FD1, FD2, AT1

b. Dependent Variable: JS

Table 1.3

This table helps to identify any significant difference between the means of different
variables.