Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Intro EE
Intro EE
net/psychology/page/18898/ee-introductions
A Sample Introduction
Please read the following introduction. Please note that the citations here are not actual sources. This is done for
illustrative purposes only.
The concept of “road rage” is relatively new. It was only in the 1990s that the media began to focus on road rage
incidents, leading some commentators to argue that road rage is a media invention and not a real phenomenon.
Other researchers dispute this, however, arguing that the term “road rage” is simply a new label for criminal,
aggressive, or anti-social behavior on the road that is a widely recognized problem and the cause of many
accidents.
Road rage at its most serious can lead to physical attacks, but it is more often manifested in aggressive driving or
verbal abuse. Surveys suggest that most drivers have experienced some form of road rage, as a victim or as the
perpetrator. For example, the British Crime Survey based on a random sample in 2007 found that over half of all
drivers questioned said they had been the victim of some form of road rage ranging from verbal abuse or gestures
to being forced off the road or threatened with violence (Marshall and Thomas, 2010). According to one
researcher, aggressive driving and road rage worldwide cause hundreds of thousands of deaths every year and
damage worth billions of dollars (McDonald, 2002, p.1). Moreover, the problem is set to increase as more people
use vehicles to travel and roads become more congested.
Many countries, including the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, and China, have acknowledged the
problem of road rage and some have taken measures to help prevent dangerous driving and road rage incidents.
Ten years ago the head of the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration declared that road rage had
become the number one traffic problem (James, 1997a).
This essay will examine the question: Can psychological explanations of road rage help in designing measures to
reduce the problem? Research by James & Taylor (1999), Mark et al (2001), and Close et al (1995) argues that
road rage is the result of learned reactions to environmental stressors and can therefore be changed. On the
other side of the argument, Frankel (2006), Bieber & Foster (2001), and Crane et al (2006) argue that road rage is
the result of specific personality traits that may be difficult to change. This essay concludes that policies that aim
to change or affect driver psychology can be useful, but policies to reduce external causes of stress are also
needed.
It is well written with an interesting first paragraph that immediately opens the discussion of road rage and its
implications.
1 of 2 12/02/2024, 19:17
Page printer https://www.thinkib.net/psychology/page/18898/ee-introductions
This is accomplished by using statistics and explaining the implications - both current and future - of this behavior.
This can also be done by looking at the history of the problem, but that was not so appropriate to this topic. It is
important that you justify your question - that means, you need to tell the reader why this question is worth
investigating. This is not a personal reflection on why you chose the topic, but rather a reason why psychologists
should investigate this question.
Road rage is defined. It is important that if the topic is broad - like “academic performance” or “therapy” - that a
clear definition or example is given that will limit what is in the paper. So, if the paper is on the effect of stress on
academic performance, you may want to say that you are only going to write about high school academics. If you
are going to write about the effectiveness of therapy in the treatment of depression, you might say that you will
only be looking at drug therapy and CBT.
This may be accomplished by writing “This paper will examine….” or “The research question for this paper is:”.
You may also want to boldface the question so that there is no doubt about your research question. Please do not
write other questions in your introduction.
E. How the argument will be made and which studies will be used is clearly stated.
This is a requirement of the introduction. The key studies and theories to be discussed must be identified in the
introduction. In other words, the scope of the argument must be clear in the introduction - and this must be
followed in the body of the essay.
F. The introduction ends with a clear statement of the thesis of the paper.
Clearly state the position that your paper will take. You can even write “The position of this paper is ….” You may
also indicate how you are going to develop your argument, but do not go into too much detail. Save that for the
body of your paper.
2 of 2 12/02/2024, 19:17