Available online at www.sciencedirect.

com

ScienceDirect
Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196

10th International Conference on Marine Technology, MARTEC 2016

Seakeeping Performance OF Series 60 Ships

M.S. Bareea,∗, Laboni Afroza
a Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, BUET

Abstract
The seakeeping performance in terms of added resistance in head and oblique seas of five series 60 ships, parent form, have been
evaluated analytically. The results are presented in tabular forms as function of principal particulars of ship, Froude Number, wave
heading and the seaway. Some comparisons of the results obtained analytically have been made with that obtained from seakeeping
tables of Grigoropoulos et. al. [2].

©c 2017
2017TheTheAuthors.
Authors. Published
Published by Elsevier
by Elsevier Ltd.is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
Ltd. This
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of the 10th International Conference on Marine Technology.
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of the 10th International Conference on Marine Technology.
Keywords: Seakeeping performance; Series 60 ships; Oblique seas; Added resistance in waves

1. Introduction
During a feasibility study or in the preliminary ship design stage, the lines of the hulls of the vessels are not
yet available. To assist the naval architects in predicting the seakeeping behaviour in such cases, Loukakis and
Chryssostomidis [1] presented the Seakeeping Standard Series (SSS) for cruiser-stern ships. The significance of the
series has two strong points: the wide range of hull forms and the number of the seakeeping responses calculated.
However, it was pointed out that the seakeeping performance of the hull forms from the Extended Series 60 has been
evaluated analytically only for head seas, while the H1/3 /LBP ratio range used, starting from H1/3 /LBP = 0.015,
corresponds to only relatively high sea states for the longer ships of today. Grigoropoulos et. al., [2] published
another seakeeping series tables for extended series 60 ships considering oblique seas. Two-parameter spectrum has
been used for representation of the seaways. In both the papers, added resistance due to wave reflection seems to have
been excluded. Again, scant usable information exists in the literature for ship responses in oblique seas, although such
knowledge can be useful for ship routing and seakeeping operability studies. Besides added resistance experienced
by a ship in a seaway is a key parameter for prediction of ship performance. With the above things in mind, it was
decided to re-evaluate the seakeeping performance of the Series 60 ships, parent form, for all headings in terms of
added resistance only.

2. Theoretical Calculations

In the process of determining added resistance in waves, prediction of ship motion is the primary step. The ordinary
strip theory [8] has been used for estimation of the ship motions in regular waves. The potential flow solution of
Maruo [3] has then been used for prediction of added resistance due to ship motion. Added resistance due to wave

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.:

E-mail address:

1877-7058 © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Peer-review under responsibility of the organizing committee of the 10th International Conference on Marine Technology.
doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.134
190 M.S. Baree and Laboni Afroz / Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196

reflection has been estimated by Fuji-Takahashi’s method [4]. Total added resistance in regular waves is obtained by
adding added resistance due to ship motion by Maruo’s method with that due to wave reflection by Fuji-Takahashi’s
method. The added resistance in a long crested irregular sea is estimated by linear superposition technique using
response amplitude operators for total added resistance in regular waves and two-parameter wave spectrum formula
recommended by International Ship Structure Congress, ISSC [7].

Nomenclature

L, LBP Length between perpendiculars of ship

B Breadth of ship
T Draught of ship
CB Block coefficient
Fn Froude number
T p Non-dimensional modal period
α Wave heading
H1/3 Significant wave height
ρ Density of water
g Acceleration due to gravity
Rcalm Calm water resistance
RTAW Total added resistance in irregular waves

3. Results and Discussion

The results of seakeeping performance of five series 60 ships, parent form, in terms of non-dimensional added
resistance as mentioned below are presented in tabular forms in Table 1 to 10, as function of principal particulars of
ship, Froude Number, wave heading etc. The following ”non-dimensionalization” has been used:

Added resistance = (mean added resistance) ∗ 1010/(ρgLBP3 (H1/3 )2 )

The calculations have been carried out at two  different B/T ratios of 2.5 and 3.0, for a range of eight modal periods,
with non-dimensional values of T − p = T p / LBP /g ranging from 1.5 to 5.0 at 0.5 intervals. Since the added
resistance varies with square of significant wave height, they have been calculated for sea states following the ISSC
two-parameter spectral model with H1/3 equal to unity.
In order to make a comparison of the results obtained, Fig. 1(a, b, & c) have been prepared for percentage added
resistance in relation to calm water resistance as function of significant wave height to ship length ratio for a series
60 ship with C B = 0.70 and B/T = 3.0 at three different wave headings, at Fn=0.20 and with non-dimensional
values of modal period, T p = 4.0 . Computed results have been compared with the results of seakeeping tables of
Grigoropoulos et. al.,[2]. It may be noted that calm water resistance of the ship has been obtained from [9]. In all the
three figures, the results obtained from the present method shows higher values than that obtained from seakeeping
tables of Grigoropoulos et. al. [2]. The discrepancy between the results may be due to the fact that the results from
seakeeping tables [2] do not include the effect of added resistance due to wave reflection while the present method
includes that effect. The discrepancy may be also due to the different theories used. Grigoropoulos et. al uses Salvesen
et. al.’s strip theory [5] for prediction of ship motion, Gerritsma and Beukelman’s method [6] for added resistance
in regular waves and a two-parameter Bretschneider et. al. wave spectrum formula mentioned in [2] for prediction
of added resistance in irregular waves, while the present method uses ordinary strip theory [8] for prediction of ship
motion, Maruo’s [3] plus Fuji-Takahasi’s [4] method for added resistance in regular waves and a two-parameter ISSC
wave spectrum formula [7] for prediction of added resistance in irregular waves.
 M.S. Baree and Laboni Afroz / Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196 191

Table 1: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.600, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 2.5

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 T P 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2442 2770 2770 640 151 500 -796 1.5 2302 2733 2878 635 70 473 1033
2 4347 4196 2593 441 32 473 -436 2 4782 4675 2883 479 118 995 904
2.5 3604 3195 1576 253 38 280 -183 2.5 4072 3626 1786 296 91 732 576
3 2378 2023 898 140 27 156 -81 3 2706 2313 1033 178 59 446 339
0.1 0.15
3.5 1490 1243 522 81 16 91 -43 3.5 1705 1426 608 108 38 269 204
4 941 775 317 48 11 54 -22 4 1081 893 371 70 22 167 124
4.5 613 500 204 32 5 38 -16 4.5 705 581 237 43 16 108 81
5 414 339 134 22 5 22 -11 5 473 387 161 27 11 70 54
1.5 2119 2668 2932 597 70 -113 1307 1.5 1754 2426 2851 549 27 5 925
2 5315 5304 3255 490 102 516 1942 2 5611 5713 3572 490 70 420 1296
2.5 4777 4287 2071 312 75 549 1560 2.5 5476 4917 2362 317 54 420 1049
3 3222 2760 1205 188 48 398 1017 3 3792 3233 1393 194 38 296 705
0.2 0.25
3.5 2039 1705 710 113 32 258 635 3.5 2421 2017 828 118 22 188 446
4 1291 1070 436 70 22 167 398 4 1544 1270 511 75 16 124 285
4.5 845 694 280 48 11 113 258 4.5 1011 823 328 48 11 81 188
5 570 468 188 32 11 75 178 5 683 554 215 32 5 54 124
1.5 1447 2017 2700 500 -11 221 893
2 5772 5896 3846 479 48 522 1178
2.5 6159 5530 2663 323 43 457 936
3 4411 3749 1598 199 27 307 619
0.3
3.5 2856 2367 958 124 16 199 393
4 1829 1501 592 75 11 124 247
4.5 1205 979 382 48 5 81 161
5 812 656 253 32 5 54 113

Table 2: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.650, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 2.5

α α
Fn Fn
TP  180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2448 2770 2883 753 -253 436 -818 1.5 2238 2679 2910 732 22 452 931
2 4669 4513 2878 570 -11 452 -457 2 5014 4917 3142 597 108 1065 871
2.5 3997 3561 1797 328 22 274 -199 2.5 4427 3948 2007 377 91 802 576
3 2679 2286 1038 183 16 156 -91 3 2996 2561 1178 226 65 490 350
0.1 0.15
3.5 1689 1415 608 108 11 91 -48 3.5 1904 1592 699 140 38 296 210
4 1070 888 371 65 5 54 -27 4 1210 1001 430 86 27 183 129
4.5 699 576 237 43 5 38 -16 4.5 791 651 280 54 16 118 86
5 473 387 156 27 5 22 -11 5 533 436 183 38 11 81 54
1.5 1985 2614 2873 672 16 -140 1302 1.5 1614 2254 2727 597 -27 -75 904
2 5439 5578 3486 597 81 554 2076 2 5740 5831 3771 581 48 409 1361
2.5 5110 4669 2302 382 70 613 1705 2.5 5885 5272 2604 387 48 441 1135
3 3513 3055 1361 237 48 452 1124 3 4164 3540 1565 237 32 317 769
0.2 0.25
3.5 2243 1904 812 145 32 296 705 3.5 2684 2232 941 145 22 210 495
4 1431 1200 500 91 22 194 446 4 1721 1409 581 91 16 134 317
4.5 936 780 323 59 11 129 290 4.5 1130 920 371 59 11 86 210
5 629 522 215 38 11 86 194 5 764 619 247 38 5 59 140
1.5 1339 1877 2631 527 -65 151 920
2 5751 6030 4137 559 22 516 1253
2.5 6493 5950 2991 382 32 473 1017
3 4766 4121 1829 237 22 328 683
0.3
3.5 3125 2631 1103 151 16 210 436
4 2017 1673 683 91 11 134 274
4.5 1329 1097 441 59 5 91 183
5 898 737 296 43 5 59 124
192 M.S. Baree and Laboni Afroz / Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196

Table 3: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.700, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 2.5

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2431 2760 3018 920 -344 355 -855 1.5 2195 2657 2953 877 -59 420 818
2 4911 4809 3217 748 -43 420 -490 2 5202 5170 3448 753 81 1146 839
2.5 4363 3927 2071 436 11 264 -210 2.5 4766 4293 2281 484 91 882 586
3 2969 2566 1210 247 11 151 -97 3 3287 2830 1366 290 70 549 366
0.1 0.15
3.5 1888 1603 715 140 11 91 -48 3.5 2103 1775 818 178 43 334 221
4 1200 1006 436 86 5 54 -27 4 1345 1124 506 113 27 204 140
4.5 785 656 280 54 5 38 -16 4.5 882 732 328 70 16 134 91
5 533 441 188 38 5 22 -11 5 597 495 215 48 11 91 59
1.5 1861 2539 2830 791 -54 -183 1291 1.5 1528 2125 2679 689 -102 -172 877
2 5530 5761 3755 737 48 597 2232 2 5826 5976 4072 705 16 393 1431
2.5 5433 5014 2582 484 59 689 1883 2.5 6267 5670 2932 473 38 468 1237
3 3814 3341 1555 296 48 516 1253 3 4524 3889 1797 296 27 344 855
0.2 0.25
3.5 2458 2098 936 183 32 344 791 3.5 2948 2475 1087 183 22 231 554
4 1571 1329 581 113 22 226 500 4 1899 1571 672 113 16 151 355
4.5 1033 866 371 75 16 151 323 4.5 1248 1027 436 75 11 97 237
5 699 581 247 48 11 102 221 5 845 694 290 48 5 65 156
1.5 1286 1807 2647 597 -140 65 958
2 5751 6116 4529 667 -11 506 1356
2.5 6859 6326 3405 463 16 495 1119
3 5164 4481 2119 290 16 350 758
0.3
3.5 3427 2894 1291 183 16 231 484
4 2222 1851 802 113 11 145 312
4.5 1469 1216 522 75 5 97 204
5 995 818 350 48 5 65 140

Table 4: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.750, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 2.5

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2491 2776 3179 1140 -393 307 -882 1.5 2211 2690 3029 1038 -151 409 732
2 5229 5105 3636 990 -38 430 -490 2 5347 5433 3825 952 65 1280 855
2.5 4815 4341 2421 586 22 285 -199 2.5 5089 4675 2631 619 102 1022 640
3 3335 2889 1431 328 22 167 -81 3 3583 3136 1603 377 81 646 409
0.1 0.15
3.5 2141 1818 850 194 16 102 -38 3.5 2319 1990 968 231 54 393 253
4 1366 1151 522 118 11 65 -22 4 1490 1264 602 145 32 242 161
4.5 898 748 334 75 5 38 -11 4.5 979 828 387 91 22 156 102
5 608 506 221 48 5 27 -5 5 662 559 258 65 16 108 70
1.5 1840 2485 2830 925 -134 -194 1313 1.5 1555 2098 2711 802 -188 -253 877
2 5621 5869 4067 909 22 689 2458 2 5853 6122 4443 855 -22 409 1555
2.5 5761 5320 2910 602 59 818 2125 2.5 6568 6063 3330 581 27 522 1399
3 4131 3620 1791 371 54 619 1426 3 4852 4244 2082 360 27 398 984
0.2 0.25
3.5 2690 2302 1087 226 38 414 904 3.5 3195 2727 1270 226 22 269 640
4 1727 1463 678 140 27 274 570 4 2066 1743 791 140 16 172 414
4.5 1140 958 436 91 16 183 371 4.5 1366 1140 511 91 11 113 274
5 769 646 290 59 11 124 253 5 925 769 344 59 5 81 183
1.5 1350 1834 2695 689 -215 0 1006
2 5772 6138 4890 796 -43 516 1495
2.5 7214 6633 3819 565 11 543 1270
3 5562 4815 2421 355 16 393 871
0.3
3.5 3733 3142 1490 221 11 258 559
4 2437 2023 931 140 11 167 360
4.5 1614 1329 602 91 5 113 237
5 1097 898 403 59 5 75 161
 M.S. Baree and Laboni Afroz / Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196 193

Table 5: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.800, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 2.5

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2813 2948 3206 1270 -533 151 -1157 1.5 2431 2813 2905 1044 -371 350 586
2 5831 5654 4104 1270 -102 317 -732 2 5605 5740 4099 1119 -16 1501 834
2.5 5568 5019 2867 785 -11 210 -355 2.5 5573 5164 2996 764 97 1248 678
3 3927 3405 1727 446 5 118 -178 3 4029 3561 1877 479 86 796 452
0.1 0.15
3.5 2544 2163 1038 264 5 70 -97 3.5 2647 2286 1157 296 59 490 285
4 1630 1372 640 156 5 43 -59 4 1711 1463 726 188 43 307 183
4.5 1070 898 409 102 0 27 -38 4.5 1130 963 468 118 27 199 118
5 726 602 274 65 0 16 -22 5 769 651 317 81 16 134 81
1.5 2098 2518 2695 882 -360 -285 1366 1.5 1754 2426 2851 549 27 5 925
2 5847 5982 4320 1022 -86 796 2867 2 5611 5713 3572 490 70 420 1296
2.5 6235 5718 3287 715 22 1011 2555 2.5 5476 4917 2362 317 54 420 1049
3 4578 3997 2082 452 38 785 1732 3 3792 3233 1393 194 38 296 705
0.2 0.25
3.5 3018 2577 1280 280 32 533 1103 3.5 2421 2017 828 118 22 188 446
4 1953 1651 802 178 22 350 699 4 1544 1270 511 75 16 124 285
4.5 1291 1081 522 113 16 231 457 4.5 1011 823 328 48 11 81 188
5 877 732 350 75 11 156 307 5 683 554 215 32 5 54 124
1.5 1732 2033 2587 608 -420 -81 1097
2 5939 6186 5024 861 -134 554 1738
2.5 7725 7025 4158 651 -27 629 1522
3 6122 5250 2722 420 0 468 1065
0.3
3.5 4169 3480 1700 264 5 312 689
4 2738 2259 1070 167 5 204 446
4.5 1824 1495 699 108 5 134 290
5 1243 1011 468 75 5 91 199

Table 6: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.600, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 3.0

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP  180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2512 2819 2587 468 16 689 -1178 1.5 2453 2776 2727 468 199 651 1458
2 4002 3900 2297 312 124 586 -678 2 4540 4330 2539 344 199 1200 1124
2.5 3217 2878 1366 178 86 328 -323 2.5 3723 3255 1528 215 134 850 656
3 2103 1802 775 102 48 178 -161 3 2442 2050 877 129 81 506 371
0.1 0.15
3.5 1313 1103 452 59 27 102 -86 3.5 1528 1259 511 81 48 301 215
4 828 689 274 38 16 59 -54 4 968 791 312 48 27 183 129
4.5 538 446 172 22 11 38 -32 4.5 629 511 199 32 22 118 86
5 360 296 113 16 5 27 -22 5 425 344 134 22 11 81 54
1.5 2367 2727 2889 441 183 -97 1700 1.5 2130 2711 2937 420 134 134 1216
2 5137 4884 2899 366 172 635 2362 2 5530 5562 3255 377 145 570 1582
2.5 4384 3798 1781 237 113 651 1845 2.5 5024 4503 2055 247 97 522 1243
3 2899 2410 1022 145 70 468 1194 3 3394 2894 1189 151 59 360 823
0.2 0.25
3.5 1818 1485 597 86 43 301 742 3.5 2146 1786 699 91 32 231 522
4 1151 925 366 54 27 194 468 4 1361 1119 430 59 22 145 328
4.5 748 602 231 38 16 129 301 4.5 888 726 274 38 16 97 215
5 506 403 156 22 11 86 204 5 597 484 183 27 11 65 145
1.5 1764 2399 2835 393 91 403 1114
2 5815 5810 3497 382 124 699 1404
2.5 5734 5030 2292 253 81 570 1092
3 3981 3308 1345 161 48 382 715
0.3
3.5 2544 2066 796 97 32 242 452
4 1619 1302 490 59 16 151 285
4.5 1060 845 312 38 11 102 188
5 715 565 210 27 11 65 124
194 M.S. Baree and Laboni Afroz / Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196

Table 7: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.650, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 3.0

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2566 2819 2674 570 -38 656 -1237 1.5 2431 2754 2813 554 161 672 1393
2 4363 4185 2523 409 118 586 -726 2 4798 4589 2781 441 204 1329 1130
2.5 3620 3206 1544 237 86 334 -350 2.5 4072 3567 1727 280 145 958 678
3 2399 2039 882 134 48 183 -178 3 2722 2286 1001 172 91 576 393
0.1 0.15
3.5 1512 1253 516 75 32 102 -97 3.5 1721 1415 592 102 54 344 231
4 952 785 317 48 16 65 -59 4 1092 888 366 65 32 210 140
4.5 624 511 199 32 11 38 -38 4.5 710 576 231 43 22 134 91
5 420 344 134 22 5 27 -22 5 479 387 156 27 16 91 59
1.5 2319 2722 2905 511 156 -102 1764 1.5 1980 2631 2856 457 102 75 1243
2 5369 5207 3142 446 178 721 2593 2 5664 5783 3443 446 145 597 1711
2.5 4750 4180 1990 290 118 753 2076 2.5 5390 4858 2254 301 97 576 1382
3 3201 2690 1157 178 75 543 1350 3 3717 3174 1329 188 59 403 925
0.2 0.25
3.5 2023 1668 683 108 48 355 845 3.5 2372 1980 785 113 38 264 592
4 1286 1049 420 70 27 231 533 4 1512 1243 484 70 22 167 377
4.5 839 678 269 43 22 151 344 4.5 990 807 312 48 16 113 247
5 565 457 178 32 11 102 231 5 667 543 210 32 11 75 167
1.5 1651 2222 2690 414 65 366 1189
2 5966 5944 3647 441 118 737 1544
2.5 6154 5406 2491 301 86 629 1221
3 4363 3631 1490 188 54 425 812
0.3
3.5 2813 2292 893 118 32 269 516
4 1802 1447 549 75 22 172 328
4.5 1183 941 355 48 11 113 215
5 796 635 237 32 11 75 145

Table 8: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.700, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 3.0

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2431 2803 2787 683 -86 619 -1296 1.5 2195 2711 2873 656 129 689 1313
2 4911 4486 2797 533 124 592 -780 2 5202 4820 3045 554 221 1479 1130
2.5 4363 3567 1764 312 97 339 -377 2.5 4766 3884 1953 355 167 1092 710
3 2969 2313 1022 172 59 188 -188 3 3287 2534 1151 215 108 662 420
0.1 0.15
3.5 1888 1436 602 102 32 108 -102 3.5 2103 1587 689 134 65 398 247
4 1200 904 366 59 22 65 -59 4 1345 1001 425 81 43 247 156
4.5 785 586 237 38 11 43 -38 4.5 882 651 274 54 27 156 97
5 533 393 156 27 11 27 -27 5 597 436 183 38 16 108 65
1.5 1861 2717 2878 586 113 -108 1818 1.5 1528 2496 2754 511 59 0 1270
2 5530 5492 3378 549 178 818 2856 2 5826 5890 3626 533 140 624 1861
2.5 5433 4556 2216 360 129 882 2340 2.5 6267 5175 2469 360 108 640 1555
3 3814 2980 1313 221 86 646 1538 3 4524 3448 1479 226 70 457 1060
0.2 0.25
3.5 2458 1861 780 134 54 425 963 3.5 2948 2168 888 140 43 301 678
4 1571 1173 484 86 32 274 608 4 1899 1372 549 86 27 194 436
4.5 1033 764 312 54 22 183 398 4.5 1248 893 355 59 16 129 285
5 699 516 204 38 16 124 264 5 845 602 237 38 11 86 194
1.5 1286 2082 2598 441 22 323 1296
2 5751 6100 3873 511 118 785 1727
2.5 6859 5820 2754 360 91 694 1393
3 5164 3997 1678 226 59 479 936
0.3
3.5 3427 2544 1017 140 38 307 597
4 2222 1619 629 91 22 199 382
4.5 1469 1054 403 59 16 129 247
5 995 710 269 38 11 86 167
 M.S. Baree and Laboni Afroz / Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196 195

Table 9: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.750, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 3.0

α α
Fn Fn
TP  180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 2727 2846 2937 823 -129 592 -1361 1.5 2437 2717 2926 769 75 726 1259
2 5137 4868 3147 683 145 613 -823 2 5261 5067 3335 689 242 1705 1189
2.5 4562 4029 2050 403 118 360 -393 2.5 4820 4239 2216 446 204 1291 796
3 3125 2657 1205 226 70 199 -194 3 3346 2824 1334 274 134 796 479
0.1 0.15
3.5 1996 1668 715 134 43 118 -108 3.5 2157 1786 802 167 86 479 290
4 1270 1049 436 81 27 70 -65 4 1382 1135 495 108 54 296 183
4.5 834 683 280 54 16 43 -38 4.5 909 742 323 70 32 194 118
5 559 463 188 32 11 32 -27 5 613 500 215 48 22 129 75
1.5 2179 2706 2851 678 65 -86 1910 1.5 1829 2399 2684 576 5 -70 1318
2 5578 5702 3615 662 183 974 3211 2 5880 5955 3835 629 140 689 2071
2.5 5374 4901 2464 441 151 1065 2695 2.5 6111 5471 2722 436 118 742 1786
3 3771 3271 1490 274 102 791 1786 3 4390 3728 1668 274 81 543 1237
0.2 0.25
3.5 2437 2060 898 167 65 522 1124 3.5 2862 2372 1011 172 48 355 802
4 1565 1307 554 108 43 339 710 4 1840 1506 624 108 32 231 516
4.5 1027 855 355 70 27 226 463 4.5 1210 984 403 70 22 151 339
5 694 576 237 48 16 151 312 5 818 667 269 48 16 102 231
1.5 1576 2039 2587 479 -22 285 1431
2 5971 6208 4169 592 118 855 1974
2.5 6751 6181 3082 425 102 796 1625
3 5008 4330 1915 274 70 554 1103
0.3
3.5 3303 2787 1167 172 43 360 710
4 2141 1781 726 108 27 231 452
4.5 1415 1167 468 70 16 151 296
5 958 791 317 48 11 102 199

Table 10: Seakeeping responses (Added Res.) per unit H1/3 square for Series 60 ship with CB = 0.800, L/B = 7.0, B/T = 3.0

α α
Fn Fn
TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 TP 180 150 120 90 60 30 0
1.5 3088 3045 3002 963 -183 570 -1619 1.5 2684 2873 2846 828 -54 791 1248
2 5950 5552 3593 909 188 629 -1022 2 5708 5519 3631 839 258 2136 1323
2.5 5503 4825 2453 554 156 377 -506 2.5 5465 4841 2555 576 258 1678 952
3 3835 3249 1469 317 97 210 -258 3 3905 3308 1582 360 178 1049 602
0.1 0.15
3.5 2475 2055 877 183 54 118 -145 3.5 2550 2119 968 221 113 635 371
4 1582 1302 538 113 32 70 -86 4 1646 1356 602 140 75 398 231
4.5 1038 850 344 70 22 43 -54 4.5 1087 888 393 91 48 253 151
5 699 576 231 48 16 32 -38 5 737 602 264 59 32 172 102
1.5 2351 2760 2700 694 -70 -102 2130 1.5 2066 2421 2571 559 -134 -156 1463
2 5842 5928 3835 780 161 1232 3900 2 6111 6149 4110 726 113 823 2496
2.5 5896 5358 2770 549 167 1399 3367 2.5 6633 5966 3093 527 129 941 2249
3 4255 3674 1721 344 124 1054 2254 3 4890 4185 1947 339 91 705 1592
0.2 0.25
3.5 2787 2351 1054 215 81 705 1426 3.5 3228 2695 1194 210 59 468 1044
4 1797 1501 656 134 54 457 904 4 2093 1727 748 134 38 307 672
4.5 1189 984 425 86 32 307 592 4.5 1382 1135 484 86 27 204 446
5 802 662 285 59 22 204 398 5 936 764 323 59 16 140 301
1.5 1872 2168 2593 436 -129 285 1721
2 6165 6396 4572 667 118 1033 2458
2.5 7300 6687 3561 506 124 1001 2076
3 5573 4820 2270 334 91 710 1431
0.3
3.5 3733 3147 1404 210 59 468 925
4 2437 2028 877 134 38 301 592
4.5 1614 1334 570 86 27 199 387
5 1097 904 382 59 16 134 264
196 M.S. Baree and Laboni Afroz / Procedia Engineering 194 (2017) 189 – 196

Fig. 1: Percentage added resistance vs. H1/3 /LBP for T P = 4 at wave headings (a) 1800 (b) 1500 (c) 1200

4. Conclusions

Seakeeping tables are widely used for prediction of ship performance in a seaway. Although the present seakeeping
tables do not cover a number of seakeeping responses for a wide range of hull forms but may be quite useful for
prediction of seakeeping performance in terms of added resistance in head and oblique seas for the type of ships taken
for study and similar ones.

References
[1] T.A. Loukakis and C. Chryssostomidis, Seakeeping Standard Series for Cruiser-Stern Ships, Trans, SNAME, Vol.83, 1975.
[2] G.J. Grigoropoulosa, T.A. Loukakisa, A.N. Perakis, Seakeeping standard series for oblique seas (a Synopsis),Ocean Engineering, February
2000.
[3] H. Maruo.,The Excess Resistance of a Ship in Rough Seas, International Shipbuilding Progress, 4 (1957) 337-345.
[4] H.Fujii and T. Takahashi,Experimental Study on Resistance Increase of a Ship in Regular Oblique Waves, 14th ITTC, Seakeeping Committee,
1975.
[5] N. Salvesen, et.al., Ship Motion and Sea Loads, Trans., SNAME, 1970.
[6] J. Gerritsma and W. Beukelman, Analysis of the Resistance Increase in Waves of a Fast Cargo Ship, ISP, Vol. 19, 1972.
[7] M.S. Baree, Added Resistance of Ships in Waves, Research Report, Ship Design Laboratory, Yokohama National University, Japan, May 2000.
[8] F. Tasai, M. Takagi., Symposium about Seaworthiness, Society of Naval Architect, Japan, 1969.
[9] F.H. Todd, Series 60 Methodical Experiments with Models of Single-Screw Merchant Ships, David Taylor Model Basin, Report 1712, July
1963.