TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE

PHILIPPINES

Business Management &

Application for Architecture 1

Submitted by:

Aivan Dave D. Magsino

AR 541-ARCH51S8

Submitted to:

Ar. Adrian R. Toisa

Date of Submission

December 15, 2023

In this interesting article, the author explores the various challenges faced by Filipino architects and
related design professionals in the Philippines. Using personal experiences from hosting a TV show
focused on architecture, the author sheds light on the common misconceptions about the role of
architects and the decreasing respect they often receive from clients. The article covers a range of
issues affecting the architectural profession in the Philippines, including biases against local
practitioners, the presence of unlicensed designers, the entry of foreign consultants, and the
departure of Filipino designers seeking better opportunities abroad. A significant concern highlighted
by the author is the widespread bias against Filipino architects, who are often treated more like
suppliers or contractors than recognized as professionals offering a specialized service. This bias
stems from a misunderstanding of the architect's role, with clients prioritizing architects based on
low fees and constant availability, rather than recognizing the diverse skills and creativity architects
bring to their work. The author also points out the irony where foreign-educated but unregistered
practitioners or consultants receive better treatment compared to their local counterparts. This not
only damages the reputation of Filipino architects but also poses a threat to the sustainability of the
profession within the country.

The article also discusses the issue of unlicensed Filipino or Fil-American designers setting up
practices, relying on effective marketing strategies and portfolios built overseas. Despite their
success, these designers lack the necessary licenses, leading professional organizations like the
United Architects of the Philippines (UAP) to issue warnings against referring to them as architects.
This situation raises concerns about accountability, as the absence of proper registration and
licensing may compromise the safety and legality of architectural practices. The author emphasizes
the importance of adhering to the Architecture Law (RA9266) and similar regulations for landscape
architecture, interior design, and environmental planning to protect public interest and ensure
accountability for malpractice. This also addresses the influx of foreign designers into the Philippines,
often featured in press releases and advertisements by real estate developers. The author reveals
that these foreign designers often lack the required permits from the Professional Regulation
Commission (PRC) and the Department of Labor and Employment, violating regulatory standards.
This raises questions about the necessity and expertise these foreign consultants bring, especially
when Filipino architects are globally recognized for their technical excellence in design. The author,
supported by insights from architect Armando Alli and Dean Danilo Silvestre, argues that Filipino
architects have the skills to compete globally and advocates for a regulatory framework that protects
local practitioners' interests. Moreover the author contends that the architectural profession in the
Philippines is at a crossroads, facing challenges that demand immediate attention and resolution. The
bias against local architects, treating them merely as service providers rather than respected
professionals, is a pervasive issue that hampers the growth of the profession. Architects are
undervalued, and their contributions are often overlooked, leading to a skewed perception of their
importance in the overall development of the country. To address this, there is a pressing need for a
shift in the mindset of clients, recognizing architects as essential partners in creating functional,
aesthetically pleasing, and safe structures.

The author also draws attention to the alarming trend of unlicensed designers, both local and
foreign, operating without the necessary credentials. This not only jeopardizes the integrity of
architectural projects but also poses serious risks to public safety. The author urges regulatory bodies
to enforce existing laws more rigorously, ensuring that all practicing architects adhere to the
necessary standards and possess the required licenses. By doing so, the architectural landscape in
the Philippines can be safeguarded against substandard practices and potential disasters resulting
from unqualified individuals engaging in architectural work. Also, the article search into the
complexities surrounding foreign consultants entering the Philippine architectural scene. The author
underscores the importance of scrutinizing their credentials, emphasizing that these individuals
should meet specific criteria, including proof of expertise not readily available among local
professionals, reciprocity from their home countries, and the necessary permits from Philippine
regulatory bodies. The lack of reciprocity with other nations and the absence of granted permits
reveal a regulatory gap that needs urgent attention to ensure a level playing field for both local and
foreign architects. It also explores the impact of globalization on Filipino architects, with many opting
to work overseas due to the perceived lack of appreciation and financial compensation in their home
country. The brain drain resulting from this trend deprives the Philippines of skilled professionals,
hindering the growth of the local architectural industry. The author suggests that creating an
environment that values and rewards the contributions of Filipino architects, coupled with
improvements in education and professional development, can help retain talent and foster a
thriving architectural community.

The writer strongly argues that it is essential to both acknowledge and control the architectural
profession in the Philippines. The article highlights the vital role of architects in shaping the
constructed environment, promoting national identity, and fostering pride of place. The author
suggests that Filipino architects should be recognized within their own country, emphasizing that
their expertise is essential for creating structures that contribute to a thriving economy. This article
serves as a persuasive call to action, urging all involved parties to tackle the many challenges faced
by local architects and establish an environment that values and supports their significant
contributions to the constructed environment, thereby ensuring the continued growth and
excellence of the architectural profession in the Philippines.