Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ebook PDF Foundations of Osteopathic Medicine Philosophy Science Clinical Applications and Research 4Th Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
Ebook PDF Foundations of Osteopathic Medicine Philosophy Science Clinical Applications and Research 4Th Edition Ebook PDF Full Chapter
CHAPTER REVIEWERS
Mark S. Cantieri, DO, FAAO
Clinical Assistant Professor
College of Osteopathic Medicine
Marian University
Indianapolis, Indiana
St. Joseph Regional Medical Center
Mishawaka, Indiana
Memorial Hospital
South Bend, Indiana
CEO, Corrective Care, PC
Mishawaka, Indiana
Board of Trustees, American Osteopathic Association
Chelsea Chung, DO
Resident Physician in Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine at time of contribution
Chino Valley Medical Center
Chino, California
WesternU-OPTI
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Western University of Health Sciences
Pomona, California
Jay B. Danto, DO
Associate Professor
Chair, Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine – Joplin Campus
Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences
Joplin, Missouri
Duane Foley, PhD
Professor of Physiology
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Western University of Health Sciences
Pomona, California
Thomas Fotopoulos, DO
Associate Professor
Chair, Department of Osteopathic Principles and Practice
Arkansas College of Osteopathic Medicine
Fort Smith, Arkansas
Lisa Hodge, PhD
Associate Professor of Molecular Biology & Immunology
Institute for Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases
Chair, Basic Science Research
Osteopathic Research Center
Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine
University of North Texas Health Science Center
Ft. Worth, Texas
Kay Kalousek, DO
Professor of Family Medicine
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Western University of Health Sciences
Pomona, California
Miklos Peterfy, PhD
Professor of Biochemistry
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Western University of Health Sciences
Pomona, California
Adriana Pollak-Lazzaro, DO
Associate Professor of Family Medicine
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Western University of Health Sciences
Pomona, California
Airani Sathananthan, MD, MSHS, FACE, FACP
Associate Professor of Internal Medicine/Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Western University of Health Sciences
Pomona, California
Deborah A. Seffinger, PhD
Clinical Psychologist, Founding Director
Advanced Psychological Associates and Wellness Center
Rancho Cucamonga, California
Li Zhong, PhD
Associate Professor of Physiology
College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific
Western University of Health Sciences
Pomona, California
FOREWORD
After Andrew Taylor Still passed away in 1917, the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) House of Delegates was created in 1920 to govern
the profession and set policies for the Association. They passed a resolution that the A.T. Still Research Institute, under the direction of Louisa
Burns, DO, would publish an updated version of the most popular textbook on osteopathic principles in print, adding current scientific knowledge
in support of the philosophy. The book was reviewed by all the osteopathic colleges for input. In 1922, this consensus-based textbook was
published by the A.T. Still Research Institute as a revised edition of the classic textbook by G. D. Hulett initially written at the turn of the 20th
century. In the early 1990s, the AOA again launched an ambitious textbook project, which resulted in the first edition of Foundations of
Osteopathic Medicine, published in 1997. Since that time, this textbook and its second and third editions (2003 and 2011) have been the
evidence-based profession-wide consensus textbook on osteopathic philosophy, clinical applications, and research for the American osteopathic
medical profession, and I am proud to have been a contributing author to the first two editions. This “centennial” fourth edition will take this effort to
new heights.
The osteopathic profession has been the fastest growing health care profession in the United States over the past half century. Many believed the
merger of the California Osteopathic Association and the California Medical Association in the early 1960s and the resulting loss of one of our six
schools would spell the beginning of the demise of osteopathic medicine as a distinct profession. In fact, the result was just the opposite. The
consequences of the recognition of our education and training opened the door for a tripling of the number of schools, including the establishment
of colleges of osteopathic medicine in public universities for the first time. Beginning in 1996, another period of sustained growth began that
continues to this day.
I believe our profession has arrived at a nexus; a convergence of three key developments—the astounding growth of the profession, the
increased public awareness of osteopathic medicine, and the opportunities for expansion of osteopathic training produced by the creation of a
single accreditation system for graduate medical education. During my term as President of the AOA, I had the opportunity to visit many of the 34
colleges of osteopathic medicine, now located on 49 campuses in 32 states. Our students have an enthusiasm and desire for their osteopathic
training to continue throughout their educational pathway. The codification of osteopathic principles in the U.S. graduate medical education
accreditation system presents a greater opportunity to expand access to that training than ever before and ultimately to increase access to
osteopathic medical care; what our patients want, what they deserve, and what all DOs are trained to provide. With over 100,000 living US DOs,
one in every four medical students enrolled in a college of osteopathic medicine, and the expansion of osteopathic Graduate Medical Education
(GME) for both DOs and MDs, the need for a standard textbook on Osteopathic Principles and Practices (OPP) and Osteopathic Manipulative
Medicine (OMM) has never been greater.
Osteopathic medicine was born and developed in America. In today’s global economy, it is experiencing worldwide expansion. As the U.S.
osteopathic profession takes a leadership role in person-centered care, this book will help shape the education that accompanies that growth. In
my experience as a career-long teacher of OPP and OMM (both within and outside the United States), a past member of Educational Council on
Osteopathic Principles (ECOP), mentor to American Academy of Osteopathy (AAO) leaders, Dean of a college of osteopathic medicine, and
past President of the AOA, I can attest to the bright future of osteopathic medicine and the importance of this profession wide consensus textbook
to that future. Please enjoy!
FOREWORD
To say there wouldn’t have been any Foundation of Osteopathic Medicine (FOM) texts without Howard M. Levine, DO, probably isn’t hyperbole.
The first edition editor, Robert Ward, DO, wrote the dedication to my father “whose vision, support, determination, persistence, and political skills
have been invaluable.” My father though, understood he needed others with the expertise he didn’t possess. So, he thanked the political
leadership, the fund raisers, the editor, the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) staff who specialized in education, and the osteopathic
physicians who kept the book “osteopathic.” His vision was to create an authoritative comprehensive publication that would help physicians and
students reference all osteopathic philosophy and practice.
I have had the great privilege of becoming an osteopathic physician. I have also had the privilege of serving as the 115th President of the
American Osteopathic Association. During the ascent to that position, I served in many other capacities. While my father served as chair of the
Bureau of Research of the AOA, he saw the need for the Foundations text. I served as chair of the Bureau of Osteopathic Education and
Research (BOCER) with Michael Seffinger, DO (Executive Editor of this fourth edition) when he developed the Low Back Guidelines that the AOA
published in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality—National Guideline Clearinghouse. Those AOA guidelines continue to reside there
with a level 1a evidenced-based grade. The Clinical Assessment Program (CAP) was led by founding chair of the BOCER and past AOA
President, George Thomas, DO, developed by Richard Snow, DO, and disseminated by Joseph McNerney, DO, while Dr. Seffinger and I
continued leading the BOCER with Sharon McGill, MPH, AOA staff.
The impact of those projects on improving quality of philosophy and evidence-based osteopathic care and patient access to that care was
immeasurable. The articles published from the CAP data demonstrated improved patient outcomes enough for multiple insurers to increase
payments to osteopathic physicians who participated. Thousands of patients directly benefitted from better outcomes in all the osteopathic family
medicine and internal medicine residency programs that participated in the CAP projects.
As an osteopathic family physician for 35 years, I have practiced while precepting third and fourth year Osteopathic medical students, third year
medical students, and osteopathic family medicine residents. The FOM has been a great resource throughout that time for teaching students,
residents, and patients, not to forget myself on osteopathic philosophy and practice. My philosophy of using osteopathic manipulative treatment
(OMT) on every patient on every visit came from my father’s father-in-law, David Steinbaum, DO (KCOM ’30), who was our family patriarch.
During his first nine years in practice, DOs were limited to only practicing manipulation. He was able to build a strong practice, and after the law
allowed full practice rights to DOs, he continued to use OMT on everyone. That was the norm when my brother and I joined my grandfather and
father in that same practice. One rule was performing lymphatic thoracic pump on all patients getting immunizations to increase their antibody
titers.
Students at our Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine while in Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine (OMM) training lab regularly ask how is this
treatment we’re learning relevant? Constant reminders and referrals to Foundations of Osteopathic Medicine for a chapter review on the subject
and relevant articles in the extensive bibliographies, helps to motivate them to practice the OMM techniques learned in lab.
I remind everyone reading and using this textbook, as I have done so during my practice precepting students and residents, in the OMM lab as a
table trainer, and during every graduation speech, white coat ceremony and CME lecture, to practice up to your education and training. Every
patient deserves to receive OMT; we know they will feel better for it, so why wouldn’t we DO it? Practice OMT, prove it, publish it, and promote it!
Thank you, Mickey, for this fourth edition.
FOREWORD
As osteopathic medicine has grown, and the number of new schools has expanded across the nation, the osteopathic profession has struggled
with consistency between its educational institutions. This is exemplified in the uniquely osteopathic component of the medical school curriculum,
osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM). Some schools, with faculty highly proficient in certain OMM techniques, or who had developed their
own techniques, could focus their curriculum on their personalized approach. Faculty at other schools may not be as familiar with those
techniques, and therefore, their students also would continue that lack of exposure. The osteopathic profession recognized that a minimum
common curriculum for OMM was needed, as well as a consensus on the terminology and definitions used.
ECOP, the Educational Council on Osteopathic Principles, was founded as an independent organization in 1969 to begin to address these
concerns. ECOP joined the American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM) in 1974 as a component council. The first
objective was the Osteopathic glossary, with its initial edition completed in 1980.
As the number of osteopathic medical schools has continued to grow, now to over 40, the need for consistency has also grown. The mission of
ECOP has been four-fold:
To improve the teaching of osteopathic principles and methods at osteopathic colleges and postgraduate centers
To encourage the free exchange of ideas and their application in clinical diagnosis and treatment in total health care
To encourage research, clinical investigation, and educational programs to improve the teaching of osteopathic principles and methods
To work toward establishing a common language of communication for intra-professional and inter-professional communication of
osteopathic principles and methods
ECOP is comprised of a representative from the OMM department at each college or school of osteopathic medicine. We meet twice a year and
address issues including continuing revision and updating of the Glossary of Osteopathic terminology, publication of the Teaching Guide for
Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, clarifying Osteopathic terms in the SNOMED database, providing technical standards for admission,
discussing accreditation standards, recommending testable material to the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners (NBOME), and
proposing resolutions for the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) House of Delegates on positions integral to the unique teaching of OMM
and Osteopathic Principles and Practices (OPP).
As ECOP has become a more organized, productive, and representative body, our products became a template for this book, and our members
contributed as section editors, authors, or reviewers, and the structure of the text has been presented and discussed at our meetings. We support
Foundations of Osteopathic Medicine, Fourth Edition, being a collection of our history and philosophical approach to patient care in different
specialties, including the five models of osteopathic care.
From my perspective, this textbook represents the full spectrum of osteopathic professional activities, including the four pillars of osteopathic
medicine: philosophy and history, basic science, clinical applications, and research. The foundational pillar of osteopathic medicine is its
philosophy, which incorporates our view on the interrelationship of the inner mechanisms of the body, as well as how the body is interrelated with
the mind and spirit. These views are supported by scientific observations. As can be seen in the basic science, clinical applications, and
research sections of this textbook, the osteopathic profession and osteopathic clinical practice stand solidly on a scientific foundation. The
osteopathic profession has continued to become more scientifically rigorous, using the evidence base to develop national osteopathic clinical
practice guidelines for use of OMT in patients with low back pain, and increasing the quality of publications in the Journal of the American
Osteopathic Association.
ECOP’s goal is for this fourth edition to continue to serve to increase the consistency of knowledge provided to our students and truly provide their
osteopathic foundation. We have been proud to partner with Dr. Seffinger to bring this edition to fruition.
FOREWORD
As Editor-in-Chief of the American Osteopathic Association, I have the pleasure to introduce this new fourth edition of the Foundations of
Osteopathic Medicine. This fourth edition is a collaborative effort of a diverse group of basic science and clinical faculty representing several
colleges of osteopathic medicine and scholarly clinicians, reflecting the osteopathic profession’s commitment to advancing the evidence for our
unique contribution to the health care system. This contemporary text, edited by Dr. Michael Seffinger, leads the reader on a journey through
osteopathic medicine, beginning with its historical and philosophical foundation, through its scientific basis and its clinical applications. Unlike
most textbooks of medicine, this one is unique, approaching the management of health and disease from an osteopathic perspective. It can be
used as a reference text for students of osteopathic medicine or as a practical tool to teach trainees in the clinic. The book contains sections on
unique areas such as biopsychosocial, lifestyle, and musculoskeletal medicine. It presents and highlights research opportunities needed to grow
the profession in the next decade. As our profession expands, this text provides the foundation for DOs and non-DOs interested in learning the
tools of osteopathic medicine.
ROBERT ORENSTEIN, DO, FACP, FIDSA
Associate Professor of Medicine
Chair, Infectious Diseases
Mayo Clinic, Arizona
Editor-in-Chief, American Osteopathic Association
PREFACE
The Foundations of Osteopathic Medicine textbook represents the collective voice of the osteopathic profession, founded by A. T. Still, MD, DO
in 1892. It has been over 100 years since the passing of Dr. Still, an event that forced the profession to determine its own destiny without its
founder at the helm. In 1922, the osteopathic profession published its first nation-wide consensus-based textbook to firmly, and in writing,
establish the philosophy of the profession and delineate its up-to-date basic science foundation. This tradition was carried forward in the first and
successive editions of this textbook. Initiated by an informal proposal for an updated textbook 40 years ago by the Educational Council on
Osteopathic Principles (ECOP), the project was directed toward development of a longitudinal curriculum in Osteopathic Principles and Practice
(OPP). Similar to the 1922 textbook, called Hulett’s Principles, which was edited and updated by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA)
A. T. Still Research Institute, the concept and plan for this text were developed within the AOA Bureau of Research. It was the Bureau’s decision
to term this activity the “Osteopathic Principles Textbook Project.” The Board of Trustees and House of Delegates of the AOA provided financial
support for its development, and the project was launched in July 1990. Under the pioneering leadership of Executive Editor Robert C. Ward, DO,
FAAO, the first and second editions of this text appeared in 1997 and 2003, respectively. Anthony G. Chila, DO, FAAO(dist), FCA, assumed the
role of Executive Editor for the third edition in 2006 and did a masterful job at restructuring the entire text toward clinical applications to
demonstrate the osteopathic thought process in practice while caring for patients.
I have been associated with this textbook project since its initial outline within ECOP in 1984. I worked with Dr. Ward since that time until he
handed over the reins to Dr. Chila, then continued as Associate Editor and author under Dr. Chila. The process of review and revision has always
been carried out in a careful and thoughtful manner. Each edition included new and updated chapters, with alternating focus on specialty or
population-based patient care then case-based patient care. Reviewers of previous editions favored a blending of both specialty/population and
case-based patient care examples of clinical applications of osteopathic principles and practices, which led to the combined format making up
the fourth edition. Additionally, color photos and illustrations along with reformatting of the content was undertaken to facilitate clarity, ease of
reading, teaching, and learning. As in previous editions, recognition is given to addressing the needs of osteopathic medical students and
physicians, including residents in training. Other health professionals will also find this text foundational, well referenced, and clinically useful.
However, the main audience for the textbook remains the first and second year osteopathic medical student. The format chosen emphasizes the
unique osteopathic approach to the patient such that the reader can grasp the meaning of the term “thinking osteopathically.” The organization of
the text is given in the following overview.
PART I: FOUNDATIONS
Section 1: Philosophy and History of Osteopathic Medicine
The first chapter sets the cornerstone of the foundation as it outlines osteopathic philosophy as originally espoused by its iconic founder A. T. Still,
MD, DO, and explores its evolution into its current day expression. The role of the ECOP in developing The Five Models of Osteopathic Care is
introduced and further expounded in Chapter 23. The five models (Biomechanical; Respiratory-Circulatory; Metabolic; Neurological; Behavioral)
are described in relation to the three standard components of a philosophy of medicine (Health, Disease, Patient Care). The explication of
osteopathic philosophy by the respected scientist Irvin M. Korr, PhD, is preserved from the first edition.
The history chapter has been updated to include events that have occurred in the first two decades of the 21st century. It presents the history of the
osteopathic profession from Dr. Still to its national and international status today. It is organized in terms of the profession’s growth and
development in the domains of pre- and postdoctoral education, research, networking, state licensure and regulation, diversity, specialties and
hospitals, and international expansion.
MICHAEL A. SEFFINGER, DO
Executive Editor
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I was encouraged to step up to the challenge of revising this profession-wide standard textbook by recommendations and formal endorsements
from the American Osteopathic Association, American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (ECOP), the American Academy of
Osteopathy and, most influentially, the Dean of the College of Osteopathic Medicine at Western University of Health Sciences, Paula M. Crone,
DO. For this tremendous profession-wide support and trust, I am deeply humbled and grateful.
This project could not have been completed without Dean Crone’s support in the form of her commitment to its completion and generous
allocation of faculty and student time and effort over the course of three years (2015–2018). Over forty members of her college participated in
various capacities to bring this project to fruition. She is directly responsible for spearheading the lifestyle medicine program at her college under
the appointed leadership of Drs. Robyn Dreibelbis and Marcel Fraix, who were instrumental in developing this new section of FOM4e. Dean
Crone also promised my wife that I could work on the textbook as part of my contract at the College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific at
Western University of Health Sciences and not expect or pressure me to work on it at night or on weekends while attending to family duties.
The research assistants in the Department of Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine/Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine were also indispensable at
reformatting the entire textbook to current styles recommended by the publisher and reviewers of past volumes.
The work involved in preparation of this fourth edition was a dedicated effort by many individuals from all corners of the United States of America.
In accomplishing their various tasks, all contributed to a cohesive product representing another level of development for this text. Grateful
appreciation is extended to the following:
Section Editors
Ray J. Hruby, DO, MS, FAAO(dist)
Frank H. Willard, PhD
John Licciardone, DO, MS, MBA
The artwork of William A. Kuchera, DO, FAAO
Special Thanks
I am deeply grateful for the loving support from my wife, Deborah (also known as esteemed clinical psychologist “Dr. Debb”). She agreed to
support my contracts with the publisher and my dean on the condition I mind my family responsibilities (9 children, 17 grandchildren, elderly
parents, and my commitment to her), continue with regular exercise, and maintain a healthy balanced lifestyle (“you can’t write about it and not live
it”). She carried out her commitment to me throughout this project with unerring consistency and devotion.
CONTENTS
Contributors ■ Foreword ■ Preface
Acknowledgments
PART ONE: FOUNDATIONS
Michael A. Seffinger
SECTION I: PHILOSOPHY AND HISTORY OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE
Michael A. Seffinger
1. Philosophy of Osteopathic Medicine
Michael A. Seffinger, Raymond J. Hruby, Felix J. Rogers, Frank H. Willard, John Licciardone, John M. Jones III, Hollis H. King
2. History of the Osteopathic Profession
John M. Jones III, Barbara E. Peterson
SECTION II: BASIC SCIENCE FOUNDATIONS
Frank H. Willard and Michael A. Seffinger
BIOMECHANICAL MODEL
3. Anatomy: General and Embryological Concepts
Mark Schuenke, Lex C. Towns, Frank H. Willard
4. The Fascial System of the Body
Frank H. Willard, Christian Fossum, Paul R. Standley
5. Biomechanics
Michael R. Wells, Clarence L. Nicodemus
6. Inherent Motion, Rhythms, and Oscillations
Thomas Glonek, Nicette Sergueef, Kenneth E. Nelson
RESPIRATORY-CIRCULATORY MODEL
7. Tissue Respiration and Circulation
Harvey V. Sparks Jr
8. Anatomy and Physiology of the Lymphatic System
Hugh Ettlinger, Frank H. Willard
9. Anatomy, Mechanics, and Physiology of Pulmonary Respiration
Frank H. Willard, Gilbert E. D’Alonzo Jr, Samuel L. Krachman
NEUROLOGICAL MODEL
10. Autonomic Nervous System
Frank H. Willard, Art work by William A. Kuchera
11. Nociception and Pain
Frank H. Willard, John A. Jerome, Mitchell L. Elkiss
12. Somatic Dysfunction, Spinal Facilitation, and Viscerosomatic Integration
Michael M. Patterson, Robert D. Wurster
13. The Physiology of Touch
Frank H. Willard, John A. Jerome, Mitchell L. Elkiss
14. Chronic Pain Management
Mitchell L. Elkiss, John A. Jerome
METABOLIC MODEL
15. The Role of Inflammation in Healing and Homeostasis
Gerald R. Thrush
16. Symbiosis: Ecology of the Human Microbiome
Robert Orenstein, Mihai Covasa, Vishwanath Venketaraman
17. Energy Balance: Nutrition, Exercise and The Metabolic Model
Marcel P. Fraix, David C. Nieman, Robyn Dreibelbis, Rebecca E. Giusti
BEHAVIORAL MODEL
18. Behavioral Science
A. Psychoneuroimmunology: Basic Mechanisms
Yadi Fernandez-Sweeny, David A. Baron, Rose J. Julius, Frank H. Willard
B. Life Stages
Yadi Fernandez-Sweeny, Jed Magen, Alyse Folino Ley, Deborah A. Wagenaar, Steve M. Scheinthal
19. Behavioral Medicine
A. Mind-Body Medicine
Yadi Fernandez-Sweeny, Howard Schubiner
B. Stress Management
Yadi Fernandez-Sweeny, John A. Jerome, Gerald Guy Osborn
C. Spirituality and Health Care
Yadi Fernandez-Sweeny, Felix J. Rogers
20. Lifestyle Medicine
A. Lifestyle Medicine—Osteopathic Perspectives
Marcel P. Fraix, David C. Nieman, Rebecca E. Giusti
B. Environmental Issues
Natalie A. Nevins
PART TWO: THE PATIENT ENCOUNTER
Michael A. Seffinger
SECTION I: THE OSTEOPATHIC APPROACH TO PATIENT CARE
Michael A. Seffinger
21. The Osteopathic Physician–Patient Relationship
Steven Lam, Dat Trinh, David L. Redding
22. Osteopathic History and Physical Examination
Janice U. Blumer, Rebecca E. Giusti, Raymond J. Hruby
23. The Five Models of Osteopathic Patient Care
Michael A. Seffinger, Edwin Amirianfar, Michael L. Kuchera, John Jerome
SECTION II: DEVELOPING AN OSTEOPATHIC MANAGEMENT PLAN
Michael A. Seffinger
24. Osteopathic Case-Based Learning, Problem-Solving, and Evidence-Based Medicine
Michael A. Seffinger
A. An Osteopathic Approach to Case-based Learning
Natalie A. Nevins, Scott Helf, Diane Padre, Matthew Albright
B. Clinical Problem-solving
Sarah A. Sprafka
C. Evidence-based Medicine
Roberto Cardarelli and Brent W. Sanderlin
PART THREE: THE SOMATIC COMPONENT
Raymond J. Hruby
SECTION I: OSTEOPATHIC STRUCTURAL EXAMINATION – IDENTIFYING SOMATIC DYSFUNCTION
Raymond J. Hruby
25. Palpatory Examination Skills and Exercises for Developing the Sense of Touch
Walter C. Ehrenfeuchter
26. Screening and Regional Osteopathic Structural Examinations
Walter C. Eherenfeuchter, Raymond J. Hruby, Rebecca E. Giusti
27. Osteopathic Segmental Examination
Walter C. Ehrenfeuchter, Raymond J. Hruby
SECTION II: REGIONAL ANATOMICAL BASIS FOR SOMATIC DSYFUNCTION
Raymond J. Hruby
28. Descriptive and Functional Regional Anatomy
Kurt P. Heinking, Raymond J. Hruby, Michael L. Kuchera
A. Head Region
Kurt P. Heinking
B. Cervical Region
Kurt P. Heinking
C. Thoracic Region
Raymond J. Hruby
D. Rib Cage
Raymond J. Hruby
E. Lumbar Region
Kurt P. Heinking
F. Pelvis
Kurt P. Heinking
G. Upper Extremity
Kurt P. Heinking
H. Lower Extremity
Michael L. Kuchera
I. Abdominal Region
Raymond J. Hruby
29. Postural Considerations in Osteopathic Diagnosis and Treatment
Michael L. Kuchera
SECTION III: VISCERAL AND SOMATIC INTERRELATIONSHIPS IN SOMATIC DYSFUNCTION
Michael A. Seffinger
30. Internal Organ Assessment for Visceral Motion Dysfunction
Kenneth Lossing, Rebecca E. Giusti
31. Assessing for Viscerosomatic Reflexes and Somatosomatic Reflexes, Jones Tender Points, Trigger Points, and Chapman
Reflexes
Michael L. Kuchera, Hugh Ettlinger, Michael A. Seffinger
SECTION IV: TREATING SOMATIC DYSFUNCTION WITH OSTEOPATHIC MANIPULATIVE TREATMENT
Raymond J. Hruby
32. The Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Prescription
Raymond J. Hruby
SECTION IVA: EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL ON OSTEOPATHIC PRINCIPLES OSTEOPATHIC MANIPULATIVE TREATMENT MODULES
Raymond J. Hruby
33. Soft Tissue
Walter C. Ehrenfeuchter
34. Muscle Energy
Walter C. Ehrenfeuchter
35. High-Velocity Low-Amplitude (HVLA) Thrust
Rebecca E. Giusti, Raymond J. Hruby
36. Myofascial Release
Judith A. O’Connell
37. Strain/Counterstrain
John C. Glover, Paul R. Rennie Illustrations By William A. Kuchera
38. Osteopathic Cranial Manipulative Medicine
Hollis H. King
39. Lymphatic Drainage Procedures
Michael L. Kuchera, Elaine Wallace
SECTION IVB: EXAMPLES OF OTHER CONTEMPORARY OSTEOPATHIC MANIPULATIVE TREATMENT METHODS
Raymond J. Hruby
40. Additional Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Approaches
A. Acutely Ill or Hospitalized Patients; Osteopathic Considerations and Approaches Using OMT
Hugh Ettlinger
B. Articulatory Procedures
Walter C. Ehrenfeuchter
C. (A.T.) Still Technique
Richard L. Van Buskirk
D. Balanced Ligamentous Tension and Ligamentous Articulatory Strain
William Thomas Crow
E. A Modern Approach to Chapman Reflex Points
Christian Fossum, Michael L. Kuchera, William H. Devine, Kendall L. Wilson Jr
F. Dynamic Strain
Jan T. Hendryx
G. Facilitated Positional Release
Dennis J. Dowling
H. Fulford Percussion
Rajiv L. Yadava
I. Functional Technique
David Eland
J. Progressive Inhibition of Neuromuscular Structures (PINS)
Dennis J. Dowling
K. Visceral Manipulation
Kenneth Lossing
PART FOUR: OSTEOPATHIC CONSIDERATIONS IN THE SPECIALTIES—POPULATION MANAGEMENT
Michael A. Seffinger
41. Osteopathic Considerations in Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine
A. Osteopathic Neuromusculoskeletal Medicine
Brian Loveless, Raymond J. Hruby, Natalie A. Nevins
B. Diagnosis and Treatment of Somatic Dysfunction in the Patient with Low Back Pain
Kurt P. Heinking, Michael L. Kuchera
42. Osteopathic Considerations in Primary Care
Jay H. Shubrook, Kim Pfotenhauer
A. Osteopathic Considerations in Family Medicine
Jay H. Shubrook, Kim Pfotenhauer, Michael A. Seffinger, Jesus Sanchez Jr, Marcel P. Fraix, Peter Michaelson
B. Osteopathic Considerations in Pediatrics
Mary Ann Magoun, Andrew J. Picca, Judith Oh Leonor, Natalie Hollick, Lukas Martincek, Karen M. Steele, Miriam V. Mills, Mary Anne Morelli
Haskell, Jesus Sanchez Jr
C. Osteopathic Considerations in General Internal Medicine
Donald R. Noll, Brian E. Kaufman
D. Osteopathic Considerations in Geriatric Medicine
Donald R. Noll, Thomas A. Cavalieri, Bruce Bates, Marilyn R. Gugliucci, Jeffrey Tsai
43. Osteopathic Considerations in Internal Medicine Subspecialties
Felix J. Rogers
A. Osteopathic Considerations in Rheumatology
J. Michael Finley, J. Michael Wieting, William Foley, Kurt P. Heinking, James Lipton, Beth A. Valashinas
B. Osteopathic Considerations in Cardiovascular Medicine
Felix J. Rogers
C. Osteopathic Considerations in Pulmonology
Gilbert E. D’Alonzo Jr, Samuael L. Krachman, William Foley, Hugh Ettlinger, Jane E. Carreiro
D. Osteopathic Considerations in Neurology
Mitchell L. Elkiss, Kurt P. Heinking, Raymond J. Hruby, Marcel P. Fraix, Rebecca E. Giusti
E. Osteopathic Considerations in Oncology
Michael I. Opipari, Augustine L. Perrotta, David R. Beatty
F. Osteopathic Considerations in Endocrinology
Michael A. Seffinger
44. Osteopathic Considerations in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Marcel P. Fraix, J. Michael Wieting, James A. Lipton
45. Osteopathic Considerations in Psychiatry
Timothy E. Blumer
46. Osteopathic Considerations in End-of-Life Care
Karen J. Nichols
47. Osteopathic Considerations in Obstetrics and Gynecology
A. Obstetrics
Anita Showalter
B. Gynecology
Anita Showalter
48. Osteopathic Considerations in Surgery
A. Osteopathic Considerations in Patients with Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Disorders
Shan Shan Wu, Robert W. Hostoffer, Kathleen Gibbons, Harriet H. Shaw, Michael B. Shaw
B. Osteopathic Considerations in Orthopedics
Richard A. Scott, Kurt P. Heinking, Michael L. Kuchera
C. Osteopathic Considerations in General Surgery
Constance Cashen, Sydney P. Ross, Christina Bohr
49. Osteopathic Considerations in Sports Medicine
A. An Osteopathic Approach to Sports Medicine
Per Gunnar Brolinson, Albert J. Kozar, Kevin D. Valvano
B. Prolotherapy for Knee Pain with Enthesopathy
Bobby B. Nourani
C. Osteopathic Approach to Diagnosing and Treating Somatic Dysfunction in the Extremities
Michael L. Kuchera, Kurt Heinking, Per Gunnar Brolinson, Thomas A. Goodwin
PART FIVE: RESEARCH INVESTIGATING OSTEOPATHIC PRINCIPLES
John Licciardone
50. Research Methods and Evidence Relating to Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
John Licciardone
51. Effectiveness and Safety of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
Michael L. Kuchera, Michael A. Seffinger, David Boesler, David A. Connett
52. Strategic Planning for Research on Osteopathic Principles and Practices
Brian Degenhardt
GLOSSARY
INDEX
PART ONE
Foundations
Michael A. Seffinger
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.