Directions:

1. Begin by reviewing the criteria listed in both the rubric and the checklist sections. Understand what each criterion means and what you are looking for in
the app.
2. Spend time using the app, focusing on how it operates and its educational value. Pay attention to the aspects outlined in the rubric and checklist.
3. Go through each item in the checklist. Mark “Yes” or “No” based on whether the app meets each listed feature or standard.
4. For each criterion in the rubric, rate the app according to the provided scale. Be objective and consider how well the app meets each standard.
5. Once you’ve completed the checklist and rubric, summarize your findings. Highlight the app’s strengths and areas for improvement.
6. Based on your evaluation whether this app is suitable for your intended educational context. Provide reasons for your recommendation.

K-5 Educational App Evaluation Checklist & Rubric

Accessibility Features:
Assess whether the app includes
features for users with different
abilities, such as text-to-speech,
closed captions, or adjustable font
sizes.
User Friendliness: Age-Appropriate Content: Adherence to Privacy Standards: Offline Functionality:
Determine if the app is Check if the app’s content is Verify if the app complies with privacy laws Assess if the app can
easy to navigate and suitable for the K-5 age group, and standards, especially concerning be used without
understand, especially for both in terms of complexity and children’s data (Ex: An app that does not internet connection.
K-5 students. appropriateness. require personal information or is COPPA
compliant)

□ Yes □ Yes □ Yes □ Yes □ Yes

□ No □ No □ No □ No □ No
 Excellent (4) Good (3) Fair (2) Poor (1)
Background The app provides comprehensive The app clearly states its The app provides some basic The app provides no
Information background information, including detailed target audience (e.g., grade information about its purpose information about its
descriptions of its development team, level), purpose, and and target audience but lacks developers, intended
educational objectives, target audience, and educational goals. Information details about its development audience, educational goals,
credible content sources. It may also include about the developers and background, educational or sources of content. There
endorsements or certifications from content sources is available objectives, or content sources. is a lack of transparency or
reputable educational organizations. and reliable. credibility.
(Ex: An app developed by a well-known
educational organization, aimed specifically at
grade 2 reading skills, with content sourced
from certified educational materials and
transparent information about its developers
and educational advisors, would be rated a 4)
Design The app is exceptionally designed, with no The app is well-designed, with The app has some technical The app has frequent
Features/Functionality technical issues, and offers a seamless, few technical issues, and issues or design flaws but is technical issues, poor design,
engaging user experience. generally enhances user generally usable. and is not user-friendly.
(Ex: An app with an interactive, visually experience.
appealing, and error-free design would be
rated a 4)
Connected to The app is fully aligned with the K-5 The app aligns well with the K- The app somewhat aligns with The app has no clear
Curriculum curriculum, providing comprehensive and in- 5 curriculum and covers a the K-5 curriculum but lacks connection to the K-5
depth educational content. range of relevant topics. depth or breadth in content. curriculum or educational
(Ex: An app that offers a variety of grade- standards.
appropriate math problems aligned with
common core standards would be rated a 4)
Instructional Features The app provides comprehensive The app offers valuable The app provides some The app offers little to no
instructional content, including feedback and instructional content that instructional content, but it is instructional value or support
adaptive learning features. supports learning objectives. limited or not well-integrated. for learning.
(Ex: An app that adapts to a student's learning
pace and provides interactive, instructional
feedback would be rated a 4)
Comments:

In using Canva, it’s evident that Canva is a highly accessible and user-friendly platform that supports a wide range of design needs. Canva offers Canva Education which adheres to the
necessary privacy standards for students, making it a valuable tool for educators and students. Canva’s design features and functionality are excellent, providing an intuitive environment for
creative diverse visual content. While its direct curriculum connections might require creative application by educators, its potential as an instructional tool is significant. Canva’s commitment
to education, as seen in its specific terms for educational use, underscores its utility and safety as an educational tool.