1099634

research-article2022
JAS0010.1177/00219096221099634Journal of Asian and African StudiesSabar and Midya

Original Research Article

JAAS
Journal of Asian and African Studies

Intersecting Knowledge With

1­–19
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
Landscape: Indigenous Agriculture, sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/00219096221099634
https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096221099634
Sustainable Food Production and journals.sagepub.com/home/jas

Response to Climate Change – A

Case Study of Chuktia Bhunjia Tribe
of Odisha, India

Bhubaneswar Sabar
Department of Anthropology, Vidyasagar University, India; Department of Anthropology and Tribal Studies, Maharaja
Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University (Erstwhile North Orissa University), India

Dipak K. Midya
Department of Anthropology, Vidyasagar University, India

Abstract
This paper documents the traditional agricultural practices of Chuktia Bhunjia tribe of Odisha, India, and
attempts to comprehend as to how they negotiate with their ecosystem in order to ensure sustainable
agricultural production and livelihood. Data, collected using interview and observation, reveal that
agricultural practices of the Chuktia Bhunjia are revolved around local ecology, beliefs, rituals and knowledge.
The knowledge-based intercropping, agroforestry, crop rotation, crop diversity, rain-water harvesting
and management of soil fertility are important domains involved in their agricultural practices that are
found to as a function of long-term observation and experiments, and are reported to have been culturally
reproduced through self-engagement and ritualistic practices associated with agriculture. Their agriculture
is assumed to have significance in maintaining the soil fertility and moisture, reducing greenhouse gases
and enhancing carbon sequestration whereby to balance the landscape. The agroforestry-based agricultural
practices, coupled with belief, ritual and technology, is also found to make their agriculture cost-effective
and ensure conservation of ecological system. Climate change–driven agricultural decision-making among
them is found to as a tool not only to arrest their crop failure but also to ensure sustainable food production
and livelihood. Yet, the expected evacuation of inhabitant including Chuktia Bhunjia due to ‘tiger-project’ is
assumed to be a threat to their agricultural knowledge and other cultural domains. Therefore, owing to the
livelihood implication of traditional agriculture, any attempt to integrate their agricultural knowledge base
with scientific knowledge would ensure sustainability of both ecology and livelihood together.

Corresponding author:
Bhubaneswar Sabar, Department of Anthropology, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, West Bengal, India.
Email: bhubansabar@gmail.com
2 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

Keywords
Local knowledge, ecology, land classification, intercropping, crop rotation, soil management, rituals, beliefs,
technology, food security, eco-restoration

Introduction
Since last decades, government is trying to boost agricultural production by various ventures like
introduction of hybrid variety of seeds, technologies, methods, adaptation of agricultural policies
and so on, to compete with global economy. The adoption of economic liberalism and globalisation
as revealed from large-scale capital investment, agricultural subsidies, agricultural policies, and so
on, has certainly resulted to growth in agricultural sector and gross domestic product (GDP) but the
subsequent urbanisation and declining agricultural land have worried scientists about how to
ensure sustainability of food production to feed the increasing masses. As Singh (2000) observes
that ‘after sixty years of massive investment of capital on this sector, people are yet to agricultur-
ally benefit as many have no adequate food supply’ (p. 47). Nevertheless, Indian farmers are
encouraged to adopt conventional agricultural technologies to increase food production for global
economic completion. Still, it has not trickled down the rural farmers rather than widening the gulf
among them. Thus, critique of the conventional agriculture, both agricultural scientists and social
scientists think of ‘alternative agriculture’ not only to challenge the concepts of ‘growth’, ‘capital
formation’ and ‘liberalisation’ but also to make agriculture sustainable and free from market orien-
tation. The term ‘alternative agriculture’ here has been used interchangeably with Indigenous agri-
culture, traditional farming, traditional agricultural knowledge, and so on, which is understood as
the embodiment of local agricultural practice, knowledge and meanings of the farmers concerned
that embrace how they express, negotiate and share the meanings and relationships embedded in
their soils, ecologies, cuisines and practices (Cernea, 2005; Chamber, 1980; McCorkle, 1989;
Netting, 1993; Rhoades, 1983; Singh 2000).
Haverkort (1995) defines traditional agricultural practices as ‘agricultural production where
technologies being used depend completely on local resources and have, over time, developed a
wide range of site-specific technologies embodied in the culture of the people in a certain area’.
The rationality of Indigenous/traditional agriculture leads to the assumption that farmers’
Indigenous and traditional-based knowledge and technologies are always well-adapted to their
environments‚ that farmers are always capable of adjusting to changes‚ and therefore serves as the
model for sustainable agricultural development (Srivastava et al., 1996; quoted in Cleveland,
1998: 335). Netting (1993) views that ‘traditional cultivators are more sustainable than commer-
cial and industrial agriculture’ (p. 144) and ‘may be more vital and necessary to our future than
we realise’ (p. 334). The studies on traditional agriculture show that the practice operates outside
of the capital intensive and high external input approaches (Cernea, 2005; Crevello, 2004; Howes
and Chambers, 1980; Rajasekaran and Whiteford 1992; Soleri and Cleveland, 1993) and works
along with ‘culture’, ‘value’, ‘tradition’, ‘decision-making’ and epistemology of ‘knowledge’
some of which have been crystallised into stable structure, institution and organisation (Brodt,
2001; Cernea, 2005; Richards, 1993).
In recent years, documentation of traditional agricultural knowledge of rural and tribal farmers
has received significant attention due to its multitude potentiality of sustainability (Rechards, 1989;
Warren et al., 1989). Literatures shows that traditional agriculture is revolved around the ecology
and shaped by the knowledge, experiments, beliefs and rituals of the farmers (Behera, 2021;
Kumar, 2010). Studies find that traditional agriculture, being ecologically driven system, is helpful
not only in maintaining and enhancing soil quality but also push to higher crop production
Sabar and Midya 3

(Crevello, 2004; Dialla, 1994; Jeeve et al., 2006; Rhoades, 1983; Talawar and Singh, 1994; Warren
and Rajasekaran, 1993). The knowledge-based agriculture is also found to be cost-effective and
climatic-resistant (Basdew et al., 2017; Behera, 2021; Charles et al., 2014; Kumar, 2014; Mini,
2005; Soropa et al., 2015), adaptable, nature friendly, and productive (Fernandez, 1994) and always
has the potentiality to escalate the conversion of carbon dioxide (CO2) to organic form and conse-
quently reducing global warming (Misra et al., 2008). Besides, mixed cropping, the important form
of traditional agriculture that provides 15%–20% of the world’s food supply (Altieri, 1999), is
assumed to decrease the risk of crop failure, pest, and disease and diversifies the food supply as
well (Sauerborn et al., 2000). Yet, it is argued that traditional agriculture although is not sufficient
to feed increasing population, the ‘practices’ associated with such agriculture helps people to grow
food sustainably besides becoming a tool to ecological restoration and natural resources manage-
ment (Behera, 2021). Thus, the traditional knowledge includes three aspects: environmental, eco-
nomic and social that can be achieved on a greater understanding of how different agricultural
systems affect the environment‚ how humans perceive the environment and environmental feed-
back in response to their agricultural systems‚ and how these perceptions affect values‚ knowledge
and behaviour.
On the above theoretical background, this present paper documents the traditional agricultural
practices of Chuktia Bhunjia tribe of Odisha, India and attempts to comprehend how they negotiate
with the landscape to enhance their food production sustainably and arrest the climate-driven food
vulnerability through Indigenous knowledge. It collects the associated knowledge, beliefs, rituals,
tools, technologies and so on, pertaining to agriculture and infers as to how their knowledge bases
agricultural practices ensure agricultural and livelihood sustainability.

Materials and methods

Bhunjia is one of the tribal groups largely distributed in central India. They are divided into two
broad social groups: Chinda Bhunjia and Chuktia Bhunjia (Pattnaik et al., 1984). In Odisha,
Bhunjia are reported to have settled majorly in Nabarangpur, Mayurbhanj, Nuapada and Baleswar
district with a total population of 12,350 with 1012 sex ratio and 44.93 literacy rate (Government
of India, 2013). The Chinda Bhunjia – also known as Oriya Bhunjia – is an acculturated section of
Bhunjia tribe are almost inhabit in all the district mentioned above. The Chuktia Bhunjia (the sub-
ject of the present study) inhabit only in Nuapada district of present-day Odisha. They are identi-
fied as one of the PVTGs in the state and exclusively inhabit in Sunabeda Wildlife Sanctuary
(SWS) bordering the state of Chhattisgarh. According to a baseline survey by Ota et al. (2020),
their total population is 3086 (1593 male and 1493 female from 938 household). They live in 35
villages/hamlets of SWS. With a sex ratio of 937, the literacy rate of Chuktia Bhunjia is estimated
to be 24.54 (29.14 male literacy and 20.00 female literacy). They belong to Dravidian language
speaking group (Russell and Hiralal, 1916) who speak Bhunjia dialect (mixture of Oriya and
Chhattisgarhi) for intra-group communication and local Oriya for inter-group communication.
Although they were reported to practice hunting-gathering form of economy, inclusion of their
habitat into the protected area forced them to become settled agriculturists. Even yet, collection of
minor forest produces (MFPs) constitutes an important source of their livelihood. They are animis-
tic in nature and worship a number of natural phenomena. Majority of their festivals are associated
with the agricultural practices and collection and consumption of various wild edibles.
The present study was conducted among the Chuktia Bhunjia tribe living in SWS (Map 1) dur-
ing March 2020 to January 2021 to document their traditional agricultural knowledge. Data were
collected using observation and interview method. Ethno-ecological approaches were largely used
pertaining to the information on land and soil taxonomy and narrative method was used to
4 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

Map 1. Sunabeda Wildlife Sanctuary.

Source: www.nuapada.nic.in.

comprehend the agricultural practices beginning with the land preparation to the harvesting of
crops. So, beliefs, rituals and festivals associated with agriculture were collected through this
approach. Each stage of agricultural practice was witnessed through observation by participant
method. Both male and female farmers between 25 and 70 years of age were interviewed to gather
required information.

Land and soil types and cropping pattern

The perception on land does vary across communities so as the Chuktia Bhunjia of SWS. The idea
of ‘land’ for them is merely a specific territorial landscape surrounding their habitation that is
believed to be gifts of their supreme deity-Sunadei. Gradually those landscapes were viewed as
entities having specific power to produce food items for human survival. Along with gradual adap-
tation of settled agriculture, land as a concept was only understood in terms of territorial occupancy
based on the utilisation of the resources by the people. In such context, Chuktia Bhunjia classify
land as (a) forest land that are occupied and under the control of forest department, (b) common
land in which everyone has the right to use (grazing land, pond, river), (c) homestead land that are
owned by the individual family and (d) agriculture land, the ownership of which is determined by
kinship and family structure. The first two are public land and last two are private land. After mar-
riage, the son establishes his own family of procreation separating from his family of orientation
and builds a separate household near his father or in the same village. The agricultural land remains
undivided so long the father is alive. The land is cultivated by all of the brothers and gets their
individual share. Once all the brothers get married, land is equally divided among the brothers. The
women do not get any share of land property.
The Chuktia Bhunjia classify land on the basis of topography and water retaining capacity
(Figure 1) as Aat (un-bunded low land with low water retaining), Berna/Behli (bunded mid-land
with high water retaining) and Bahal (bunded high land with high water retaining). Aat is used to
grow crops that require less water, usually of millets and cereals. Berna and Bahal are used for
paddy cultivation because of high water retaining capacity. When Berna or Bahal is of big size,
it is called doli whereas if these are of small size located in a low water zone, it is called tipri.
Sabar and Midya 5

Figure 1. Land classification by Chuktia Bhunjia.

They prefer to grow short duration paddies in tipri, whereas Bahal-doli are preferably used for
long duration paddies. When land remains un-plough or uncultivated, they call it paria. Similarly,
they also classify land on the basis of its location such as Khol (land in between two hill track),
bandhli (land with water pouring from every side), damka (small size land within hill with up-
down) and kachhar (land nearby river bank).
The Chuktia Bhunjia classify soil on the basis of texture as (1) belsu (sandy soil), (2) mal/khalia
(sticky soil), (3) darli (stony soil), (4) khatu mati (loamy soil), sukha mati (wet soil) and rengtha
mati (stony field) (Figure 2). Belsu and khatu are considered suitable for cultivation in which they
grow millets such as Gurji (Setaria italica), Kodo (Paspalum scrobiculatum) and Rias (Sesamum
indicum). Mal/khalia is unfertile and is seldom used for cultivation. They grow jute and Rias
(Sesamum indicum) in Aat with mal texture. However, nowadays, local varieties of paddies are
grown. Rengtha are not suitable for cultivation due to lack of water retaining capacity, so remain
left for grazing. Darli, although not suitable for growing crops, is mixed with cow-dung to make it
productive. They generally grow millets, namely, Jandhla (Zea mays), Khedjandhla (Sorguum
vulgare); pulses like Kandul (Canjanus cajan), Semi (Canavalia ensiformis) and Jhunga (Vigna
unguiculata); and jutes in this soil.
On the basis of colour, they classify soil as (a) kalamet (black soil), (2) bhurbhuria (black soil
with low texture), (3) Khari (black with less texture), (4) ratamet (red soil) and (5) chhuimet
(white). The first two are considered fertile whereas the last two are not cultivable and used for
cultural purposes and splashing houses. Land use for slash-burning cultivation (Bewar) is known
as dehi where they grow millets such as Madia (Eleusine coracan), Birhi (Phaseolus mungo) and
pulses like Kulath (Macrotyloma uniflorum), Kandul (Canjanus cajan), Junga (Vigna unguicu-
lata), jutes and local varieties of paddy of short duration. So, a kind of mix cropping is practiced in
dehi. Kitchen garden (Biar) is also an ecological and traditional land use system among Chuktia
Bhunjia which involves multiple benefits involving management of useful plants species for fam-
ily consumption. They grow vegetables like Biagan (Solanum melongena), tomato (Lycopersicum
esculentum), chilies (Capsicum annum), Semi (Canavalia ensiformis), Jada (Ricinus communis),
6 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

Figure 2. Soil classification by Chuktia Bhunjia.

Kaker (Cucumis sativus), Batlakanda (Eulophia nude), Jhunga (Vigna unguiculata) and so on, in
their kitchen garden. They also decompose cow-dung in their kitchen garden for composting pur-
pose that make their kitchen garden fertile than usual.

Agriculture as a practice: land preparation and beginning of agriculture

The agricultural practices among the Chuktia Bhunjia are found to be embedded with knowledge,
beliefs, rituals and local ecology. Two types of cultivation are found among them: slash-burning
cultivation and wet-land cultivation. The first type is usually meant for growing small millets and
cereals whereas in second type they grow paddy. Both the types of cultivations are explicated here
below. Although, the preparation of land to cultivate follow different methods and time periods, the
epistemology involved in the cultivation processes follow similar beliefs and rituals that have been
narrated while explicating the agricultural processes and practices.

Slash-burning cultivation
The slash-burning cultivation (Bewar/Dehi) constitutes an important form of economy among the
Chuktia Bhunjia of study area. Although restriction has been imposed by the forest department on
this form of cultivation, to arrest the forest fire, the Chuktia Bhunjia continue to practice it due to
the fact that it is their only source of cultivation in which they grow millets, cereals and short dura-
tion paddies that supplement their food requirements during food crisis, especially during the mon-
soon. The selection and preparation of dehi is woven into their culture, belief and ritual that begins
only after celebration of aam-jatra/holi in the month of March-April which is celebrated largely to
eat new mango (Mangifera indica), chahar (Buchnania lanzan) and mahul (Madhuca indica)
Sabar and Midya 7

flowers. In the fixed day, both children and young of each village pull a chariot made of Palsa
(Butea monosporma) flowers in the village lane that indicates the celebration of this festival. The
chariot is considered as the seat of Goddess Sunadei. The young people who participated in the
event, take bath in the river stream before entering their home. In the same day evening, male
members of each village assemble at Sunadei temple. They collect some dried wood to make a
triangular hut exactly known as holi. They fix a branch of Semel (Combax ceiba) tree in the mid of
holi. Pujhari worships the village deities inside it by offering newly grown mangoes (Mangifera
indica), chahar (Buchnania lanzan) and kendu (Diospyrus melanoxylon). During this time, one of
the members closes its entrance by covering branches of trees or dried wood. Pujhari’s son sets the
holi fire immediately. Once Pujhari comes out by any means, head of the village cuts the fixed
semel branch with an axe and a chicken is left in the fire as an offering to the deities. This festival
symbolises the setting fire of dried wood and bushes for bewar or dehi cultivation. This festival is
also meant to eat eating minor forest produces like mango (Madhuca indica), chahar (Buchnania
lanzan), kendu (Diospyrus melanoxylon) and so on. After this festival, they select the land on the
basis of soil colour, however, land with fewer trees and shrubs are obvious criteria for selection. It
becomes easier for them to clear and prepare the land in a timely manner. They cut all the thorny
bushes and shrubs found in the selected patches with axe that are allowed to be dried in the field.
The big trees, fruit giving and religious trees are purposefully left in the selected patches. In case
they cut the big trees, they bring the timbers to home that are used for house construction, furniture,
fuel wood, and so on. Once the left branches in the field are completely dried, dried cow dung are
poured over it to be burned along with these in order to make the land fertile and productive. It is
usual practice among them that they prepare the organic waste by putting cow dung and other
livestock waste in a pit either in kitchen garden or in agricultural field for several days to months.
The heap of organic waste undergoes microbial degradation that converts organic waste into com-
post. Once it is ready to use, they just scatter the compost throughout the field before monsoon.
The actual cultivation, especially of paddies, begins on the day of askhya tritiya (an auspicious
day that falls on the third day of June) by broadcasting the paddy obtained from the village priest
on the day of Chaitra –another agricultural festival celebrated by Chuktia Bhunjia in the month of
April–May. On the fixed date, usually on Tuesday, all the village deities are worshipped by the
village priest. The male member/s from each household gather at a sacred grove located outside the
village. The village priest worships all the deities there on behalf of the villagers by offering liquor,
rice, coconut and sacrificing a hen and a male goat. At the end of the festival, Pujhari asks people
to prepare a symbolic form of agricultural field, a plough and two bullocks with small branches and
leaves of Bardi (Ficus benghalensis) tree, respectively. He tilts the land with these symbolic plough
and bullocks as does in real life and others fill water in the symbolic agricultural field. Some people
pour water over pujhari as if it is raining. He worships the deities for good rain and good harvest-
ing. He also acts like broadcasting paddy, transplanting seedlings and catching fish and shell as the
farmers do in real life. In the evening, they reassemble at the same place, bringing a new white
cloth with them. The meat of sacrificed animals is equally distributed among the households.
Pujhari then gives everyone a handful of paddies brought from his home which they broadcast in
their own agricultural land in the day of akshya tritya.
In the first monsoon or asad (June–July), they tilt the field with traditional plough. The weeds
and grasses grown in the field are removed and kept in land boundary. They sow different crops
such as Madia (Eleusine coracan), Khedjandhla (Sorguum vulgare) and Jhunga (Vigna unguicu-
lata), and pulses such as Birhi (Phaseolus mungo), Kandul (Canjanus cajan), Rias (Sesamum
indicum) and so on, altogether in dehi. So, they follow mix or intercropping. Sometimes millets,
cereals and pulses are grown in the same field but separately. Crops such as semi (Canavalia ensi-
formis), maka (Zea mays), Jhunga (Vigna unguiculata) and so on are cultivated without ploughing
8 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

the land rather simply by digging holes to plant the seeds. The cultivation of madia is a two-stage
process: seedling (palha) and transplantation (rupa). The seedling takes around one month to be
ready for transplant that takes place usually during late July–August. The same patch is tilted with
plough in moderate rain after which the transplantation is done.
The Chuktia Bhunjia opine that the cultivation of millets and pulses in dehi does not require
much cares because the land use to cultivate these is perceived being fertile and nutrient-rich. They
only visit to the field to check for germ infection, if any, and to protect the crops from wild animals
and birds. It is reported that the crops cultivated in a year are usually not repeated rather grown in
alternative years in the same field with a belief that crop rotation will rejuvenate the soil nutrient.
Yet, they grow Khedjandhla (Sorguum vulgare), Jhunga (Vigna unguiculata) and Birhi (Phaseolus
mungo) in a regular fashion. When the crops grown in the dehi is harvested, they prefer to cultivate
Semi (Canavalia ensiformis), tomatoes, chilies, brinjal and so on, for their own consumption.
Earlier they used to shift the patch for cultivation but at present due to restriction from the forest
department, it is almost stopped and crop rotation takes place in two fixed dehi.

Rain-fed wet rice cultivation

The rain-fed wet rice cultivation, alongside slash-burning, too begins on the day of akshya tritya.
The land use to grow paddies – aat and doli – are also prepared after the aamjatra. The Chuktia
Bhunjia do not follow any norms regarding first tilting of paddy land, although its cultivation
endows with sets of rituals and festivals. They simply remove stone and thorny plants before mon-
soon to make the land ploughable and cultivable. Since the study area is arid and has low rainfall
zone, monsoon lash their agriculture. The Chuktia Bhunjia tilt the land in first monsoon once or
twice according to requirements depending on soil texture. They throw the weeds that have grown
out of the field or kept in boundary. They perceive that the weeds grown in the field absorb the
entire nutrient from soil and affect growing the plants. The paddy cultivation in aat is different
from that of doli. Aat is used to grow short duration paddies (locally called aatdhan) besides gurji
(Panicum colonus L.), kodo (Paspalum scrobiculatum L.), suan (Panicum sumatrense Roem &
Schutt) and rias (Sesamum indicum L.), whereas doli is used to grow long duration paddies. The
short duration paddies include Gauji, Tikta, Lachei, Kalikhuji, Sakri and so on, and the long dura-
tion paddies include Jhuli, Banskatha, Lalbanko, Goondi, Lalat and so on. When they grow pad-
dies in aat, they plough the land twice or thrice depending on the texture of soil. Then, after sowing
seeds, they again tilt the field in order to cover the seeds with soil followed by levelling the field
with a leveler or harrow (kapar) made up of either Sal (Shorea robustas) or Palsa (Butea mono-
sperma) plant. They do not tilt the land so deeper which is believed to cause delay of seed
germination.
They maintain soil moisture balance before and after broadcasting of seeds by various methods.
They believe that excess moisture and lack of moisture are negative indication of seeds germina-
tion that depends on type of soil and the way the land is tilted. If the land is tilted so deep, land
moisture is believed to last for longer period. Similarly, loamy soil and block soil keep moisture for
longer whereas sticky soil keep the moisture for very short period due to its hard soil particle and
high textured. Accordingly, they grow crops and tilt the land. They also experience that long dura-
tion paddies require high moisture and short duration crops require low moisture. They said that it
is not suggested to sow seeds in highly moistured soil until moisture decreases to desired level. In
such cases, they remove excess water from the field in order to balance the land moisture.
The cultivation of paddies in doli require water in balanced manner. It is usual practice among
them that all the bunds are properly closed in order to store water required for moisture and
germination of seeds. The sowing of paddy depends on the amount of rainfall. The Chuktia
Sabar and Midya 9

Bhunjia adopt two different methods of cultivation: (a) broadcast and (b) transplantation. If they
chose to broadcast paddies, it is done on two ways: (a) Khurdabuna and (b) Uperbuna. The for-
mer method – khurdabuna – is usually followed when the rainfall is low in which seeds are sown
little deeper to soil. In this method, the land is first tilted followed by broadcasting the seeds and
ploughing over it. An elderly male member of the family broadcasts the seeds by holding in basketry
after offering a handful of seeds to the Earth Goddess in a corner of the field. If the seeds are sown
in loamy soil, they require to use harrow to level the soil. The second method – uparbuna – is
adopted when the rainfall is high or soil get stack in the plough during tilting and farmers are unable
to tilt the land. In this method, seeds are sown over the land. They first close the bunds of the field
and tilt the field so as to soften the soil. Then they sow the seeds over it. They do not tilt the field
again as it is done in the first method, otherwise the seeds may either be stacked in the soil or de-
germinated. No ploughing is required to cover up the seeds as done in Khurdabuna. This kind of
method is generally adopted when they cultivate seeds in sticky soil (malmet).
The Chuktia Bhunjias also grow paddies by transplantation method. The long duration paddies
are usually cultivated in this method. It has two steps: growing of seedling (palha) and transplanta-
tion (ropa). They grow seedling in loamy or sandy soil to make it easier to pluck. The land is first
tilted twice which is then leveled with a leveler/harrow (Kapar). The seeds are then broadcasted
evenly over the soil and tilted low-deep again to cover the seeds. Once the seedling is ready to
pluck, they close entire bunds (phar) of the doli to store the rain water. They remove the weeds
grown in field and sometimes small thorny bushes are left there to be decomposed in the field
which they perceive to become good manure. They pluck the seedlings a day before transplant. An
elderly member of the household pours little cow milk in the east of seedling field as an offering to
Earth Goddess and plucks two/three plants before allowing others to pluck the seedling. The
plucked seedlings are made into stalk by tying up in paddy straw. The stalked seedling is called
jhura. The jhuras are properly washed before transplantation. The land is then tilted twice or thrice
to soften the soil. The bunds are opened to dispatch stored water after which the head of the house-
hold offers little raw cow milk in the name of village deities for good yield and transplants two or
three seedlings before asking others to transplant.

Agricultural decision making: knowledge, climate change and cropping

Given the narration about the above mentioned cultivations, it is also fact that the Chuktia Bhunjia
make their decision regarding agriculture on the basis of climate change and variability. By climate
change, they refer late rain, abnormal rainfall, increasing temperatures, drying out of wetlands,
strong winds and thunderstorm. They said that in early days, they could be able to prepare them-
selves for transplantation and weeding in the month of July but these days, they wait for rain to
come in the same period. Earlier, agriculture season was usually felt during late June to mid-July
but now the ploughing is hardly noticed because of late monsoon. As a result of these changes,
agricultural seasons have shifted from August to December. The unpredictability of rainfalls, cou-
pled with high temperature, certainly has resulted in prolonged droughts-like situation in their
region and impacted their food security by decreased yield of paddies in particularly, the Chuktia
Bhunjia have able to produce their staple diets, that is, millets and cereals by adopting the
Indigenous strategies of reading weather and cultivation of climate-resistance crops. Thus, the
agricultural decision making among them is said to be the result of climatic experience and knowl-
edge of weathering behaviour.
The Chuktia Bhunjia also adopt knowledge-based climate indicators in making farm level deci-
sions concerning crop selection, seed sowing, planting and harvesting to adapt to climate change
and variability based on local experiences with an aim to improve crop production. The adaptive
10 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

measures involve changing planting dates, observing nature (plants, animal behaviour and atmos-
pheric indicators) to predict season quality, mulching, mixed cropping and change of crops. To put
it another way, the Chuktia Bhunjia easily read the environmental conditions and understand the
natural happening of the surrounding which they said to have learnt from their parents, grandpar-
ents and self-observation. They predict the weather by looking at the behaviour of animals, plants
and atmospheric conditions (Table 1). Accordingly, they grow crops to avoid being trapped by crop
failure. The in-depth interviews with the experienced farmers revealed that change in local weather
has forced many of them to shift crop pattern and farmers are now preferring to grow those crops
that require less water. Therefore, millets and traditional variety of seeds are abundantly reported
to have been cultivated by the Chuktia Bhunjia that are believed to grow in meagre rainfall. Ragi,
the cultivation of which was stagnant due to inclination towards cash crop production, is therefore
regained its importance because of similar cause, that is, requirement of less water. Similarly, in the
context of climate variability, cultivation of crops requiring much water, especially paddies, is
generally not preferred rather than switching over the traditional varieties of paddies. However,
cultivation of hybrid varieties of paddies is not completely ignored.

In between broadcasting and harvesting: knowledge, practice and cropping

Each type of crop grown requires cares differently. The Chuktia Bhunjia too takes care of the crops
not only by protecting the crops from diseases and wild animals but also maintaining the soil mois-
ture. They perceive that crop grown in dehi require less care because soil biomasses in dehi auto-
matically maintain soil moisture and help growing the crops properly. They simply protect the crops
from pest and wild animals by making temporary boundaries of dehi using non-timber plant species.
They sometimes erect an effigy made of paddy straw. Once the plants start procuring seeds, they

Table 1. Knowledge about climate change.

Indicators Descriptions Interpretation

Animal behaviour
Frog Crocking sound Rain coming soon
Bee nest Bee nest is high Bad weathering and low rain
Ants Migration with their egg Rain within a day or two
Bird Bird nest is low Bad weathering and low rainfall
Hawk Cry for three consecutive days Good rainfall shortly
Plants behaviour
Mahua flowers Deep yellow Good rain and harvesting
Less yellow and turning to reddish Bad harvesting and crop damage by insect
No flowers in trees Famine
Bamboo If bamboo blooms flowers, Famine in the subsequent year
Mango If parrot eat mango from below Late monsoon
If parrot eat mango from up Good rainfall throughout the year.
Atmospheric behaviour
Wind Wind blow from south direction Heavy rain
Clouds Appearance of dark cloud Rainfall in with few hours
Moon ring Closer the ring in moon Late rainfall
Distanced the ring in moon Good rainfall shortly.
Rainbow Appearance of rainbow after rain Rain is not coming for few days
Sabar and Midya 11

start staying in crop field by construct a temporary hut there, even during night, to protect their crops
from wild animals. Furthermore, since majority of Chuktia Bhunjia practice dehi cultivation in the
hill slope, there is always a fear of soil erosion. They view that higher the intensity of slope greater
is the soil erosion. They control soil erosion by certain traditionally-adopted methods such as mulch-
ing, making bunds, growing of grasses in the boundaries, placing small stumps in the bunds, hori-
zontal ploughing across the slope, and so on. They also construct trenches so that the run-off water
would go out of the trenches without hampering the crops. They sometimes make hays at the end of
the patch to dispatch the water through it. In case of high rainfall, they make bunds to avoid running
of water through the crops field.
The paddy cultivation, on the contrary, requires specific knowledge on plant, soil and water. At
first, they balance the moisture of the crop field by traditional methods that in fact depend on the
soil texture and rainfall. When crop plants become half a foot height, they store the rainwater by
closing all bunds and then plough the land again to soften the soil. It is believed to help paddy to
grow faster and plants make bunches thereafter. This is known as Bihida. During this time, they
drain all the stored water to balance the soil moisture. Besides, the agricultural practices being
embedded with the rituals and festivals, many deities are always attributed to the crop production.
They owe God Bhima for good rain and Goddesses Chorokhutein for good production, albeit,
Sunadei is believed as proprietary deity. They celebrate Asadkhena/hariyali tihar in August-
September meant to pluck weeds from the crop fields where they offer local liquors and sacrifice
hen and goat to Goddess Gangadi for good yield and to protect the crops from diseases. So, this
festival is also known as Gangadi Jatra. Women are usually engaged in weeding activity.
The Chuktia Bhunjia also protect the crops from the insect. Although, now many of them are
preferring to apply the fertilisers freely provided to them by the government, use of Indigenous
method is predominantly noticed. The crops are believed to be affected by the insect (baki) after
Bihida. In such situation, they commonly spray ash in the field which they believe works as
insecticide. Similarly, they fix a branch of Bhelwa (Semacarpus anacardium) in agricultural
field in the day of lunar escape which is believed to work as both pesticide and insecticide. Many
of them allow spider (makra) to grow in their crop field as well that are believed to prey on
insects. When the crops are affected by unknown diseases, they cure it using religious methods.
In such case, some elder members of the village including the village headman, village priest and
Kotria (who sacrifice hen/goat during festival) remain fast for a day and ask all the elder mem-
bers of the village to assemble at Sunadei temple during night. They bring a leaf cup of rice and
ghee with them to be offered to the deities. After mixing all the rice, each one present there offers
a fist of rice and wine in the name of village deities to protect the crops from this misfortune. It
is known as Jagar.
Once the paddies are half grown, they celebrate Nuakhai in the month of Bhodo (August–
September), usually in a single-fixed day, mean to offer newly grown paddies to their deities before
consumption. They clean their cloth, houses, utensils and other household materials before the
festival. They also throw all the old mud utensils out of the home. In the fixed date, male member/s
of the household go to forest to bring newly grown Kurei (Holarrhena pubescens) leaves to prepare
leaf cups and plates. They also offer newly grown paddy to their deities in this leave only. A male
member from each household goes to the agricultural field to bring newly grown paddy or often
asks others, if not cultivated in their field, that are converted to bitten rice (Chihra) in husking tool.
Sometimes, elder brother also invites other brothers, if any, to his home for the purpose who come
with a plate of rice, Chihra and a leaf cup of ghee for ritual purpose. Once the head of the house-
hold finished offering the new crops in the form of Chihra to home deities, he offers the same to
other members of the families to eat followed by giving it to the cow or bullock.
12 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

Harvesting to preservation: techniques, ecology and sustainability

The Chuktia Bhunjia harvest the crops usually after Dasahara festival in the month of October–
November. The millets and cereals are usually harvested earlier than the long duration crops. Short
duration paddies are also harvested after millets in November. Harvesting takes place in three dif-
ferent stages: reaping, thrashing and spinning/cleaning. Tools use differs in each stage. Their har-
vesting tools include sickle, paddy straw (biat), rope and bullock. Reaping is done with sickle
(hasia). The head of the household first reap the crops before allowing others to do after offering a
leaf-cup of raw cow milk to deities in a corner of the crop field. The reaped crops are bundled by
tying in paddy straws (biat) that are later brought to the threshing pit (khala) with a stick made of
bamboo or teak.
Once the stalks are dried properly, they thrash the crops with the help of bullocks. They fix a
wood on the ground. Six to seven bullocks are tied in a rope (deie) to move around the crops so as
to separate the seeds from straw. It is known as maden. Crops such as paddy, kodo (Paspalum
scrobiculatum) and gurji (Panicum colonus) are harvested in this method. Madia (Eleusine cora-
can) is thrashed by leg power. The harvesting of pulses is different from that of paddies. In the
former, they do not pluck or cut the whole plants rather root parts of the crops are left out which
they believe become good manure and nutrient for next crops. Pulses like birhi (Phaseolus mungo),
kandul (Canjanus cajan) and rias (Sesamum indicum) are thrashed simply by striking against
wooden object.
The final stage of harvesting is winnowing or spinning (demara) where chaffs are removed
from pure seeds using winnowing fan (supa). The cleaned seeds are then exposed to sunlight in
order to remove the water contain before storing for next use. The seeds to be consumed or mar-
keted are stored separately from the cultivable seeds.
The Chuktia Bhunjia also celebrate Chauldhua/Pithori in the month of Dial (October–November)
to wash the newly harvested grains before eating. Until this festival is celebrated, no household is
allowed to wash the newly harvested paddy before eating. At the end of the harvesting, they cele-
brate a ritual called Choro to thank Goddess Chorokhuten for protecting the crops throughout the
process. They invite village priest, few elder male members of village and other clan members. The
village priest worships the Goddess on behalf of the family by offering local liquor, hen and male
goat. Then a sacrificial feast is given to all people attended the ritual.
The Chuktia Bhunjia adopts various methods to preserve harvested seeds preservation. They
first expose the seeds into sunlight to remove the water contain. They preserve kodo (Paspalum
scrobiculatum), gurji (Panicum colonus), madia (Eleusine coracan), and so on in the bag made of
paddy straw (pura). The quantity of seeds in a pura ranges from 10 to 20 mann (1 mann = approxi-
mately 5 kg). Pulses like birhi (Phaseolus mungo), kulath (horse gram) and leher (Cajanus cajan)
are stored in this method by adding lim (Azadirachta indica) leaves and ash. After keeping the
required amounts of seeds, the bag is airtight so as to protect the seeds from germs and insects.
They also store the pulses in basketry (kunli) for which the outer and inner surface of baskets are
first plastered with cow-dung and dried. After keeping grains, they firmly close the opening of the
bags with Tectona grindis leaves. The Chuktia Bhunjia also preserve forest produce such as kendu
(Diospyros melanoxylon), tetel (Tamarindus indica), chahar (Buchnania lanzan) and mahul
(Madhuca indica) in leaf bags made of sial (Bauhinia vahlii) or palsa (Butea monosperama) after
exposing these into sunlight. They firmly close the opening of the bag with the same leaves. The
bags are then hung over the hearth. Maka (Zea mays) and khedjanha (Euphorbia pulcherrima) are
simply hung over the hearth to keep it dry for next use.
Sabar and Midya 13

Discussion and conclusion

The description on the agricultural practice of Chuktia Bhunjia shows that their agriculture is
revolved around the knowledge and ecology; and each stage of their agricultural practices is
embedded with certain beliefs and rituals. Their agricultural practices reveal that selection of land,
seeds and cropping are determined by the knowledge-based experience and ethnoecological-based
climatic knowledge gained from parental generation. The important domains of Chuktia Bhunjia’s
agricultural practices involve intercropping, crop rotation, crop diversity, rain-water harvesting
and management of soil fertility that works with both knowledge and long-term experiences. The
narratives about their agricultural patterns shows that the agricultural practice of Chuktia Bhunjia
has two strands: ecological and cultural. The former revolves around the knowledge, experience
and observation whereas latter is associated with beliefs, rituals and ecology. Its ecological strand
is noticed from their multiple negotiation with landscape through cropping and its management. It
was found that small landholding and available seed diversity have historically led to practice
intercropping and crop rotation particularly in dehi cultivation. Although very few Chuktia Bhunjia
express that intercropping help them to manage the cultivation at minimal cost with a fact that
crops grown in dehi are believed to help each other’s growth, crop diversity is also another dimen-
sion that is maintained through this practice as noticed from the cultivation of millets, cereals,
pulses and so on together. So, they prefer climber species with other tree species whereby they
have nothing to worry about the supporting species for climber especially semi (Canavalia ensi-
formis), jhunga (Vigna unguiculata). Yet, scientifically it is proved that intercropping reduces the
climate-driven crop failure as variety of crops have different climatic adaptability (Shava et al.,
2009; Tripathi and Singh, 2013) and efficiently utilise the natural resources such as land, light,
water and nutrient and increase productivity along with maintaining stability of agroecosystem
(Mushagalusa et al., 2008; Ning et al., 2017; Zhang and Li, 2003) besides, reducing CO2 emission
and increasing crop productivity (Hu et al., 2017). Besides, intercropping among them has other
dimension, that is, maintenance of crop diversification.
Agroforestry-based agriculture practice is predominantly reported to have been practiced by
the Chuktia Bhunjia largely in dehi cultivation. Although, no farmer expressed any reason for it
except as a ‘land use management system’, studies in other parts of globe show that it is widely
adopted as a climate-smart practice due to its potentials for enhancing soil organic matter, agri-
culture productivity, carbon sequestration and water retention (Kala et al., 2008; Nair et al., 2009;
Nyong et al., 2007; Paul et al., 2017; Schoeneberger et al., 2012; Zomer et al., 2016). The tree
components in crop fields that are purposefully left to grow are believed to reduce the severity of
extreme weather events like floods and tropical storms (Lin, 2011; Matocha et al., 2012) and
serve as the windbreaks and shelter belts (Lasco et al., 2014). Furthermore, the Chuktia Bhunjia
perceive that agroforestry-based agriculture has made their practice cost-effective as they are
nothing to purchase as fertiliser because the leaves of trees are believed to become good manure
and biogases for the crops. It is estimated that about 1.2 billion people in developing countries
depend on agroforestry to sustain their livelihood and agricultural productivity (Food and
Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), 2011) that are assumed to be adaptable to
drought conditions as trees are believed to explore a larger soil volume for water and nutrients
(Mbow et al., 2014; Verchot et al., 2007).
In addition to it, the use of organic manure prepared from cow dung and other livestock wastes
by composting method is abundantly found among them which they perceive being the enhancer
of soil fertility and productivity. Two traditional practices are involved in their composting method:
organic waste management and enhancement soil fertility. The use of variety of organic materials
in composting process such as straw, crop residues, agroindustry by-products, livestock waste,
14 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

sewage sludge and kitchen waste are believed to become a nutrient-rich organic product necessary
for plant growth. Studies also reveal that organic compost increases soil carbon sequestration and
reduces greenhouse gases emission (Forte et al., 2017; Mehta et al., 2014) and enriches soil organic
matters, soil fertility, soil microbial diversity, soil moisture and reduces soil erosion and crop pests
and diseases whereby to ensure crop yield (Fließbach et al., 2007; Ge et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2013;
Mader et al., 2002; Magdoff and Weil, 2004; Zhang et al., 2012). Besides, the materials used for
composting being available freely at their home and forest, this practice not only make their agri-
culture cost-effective but also by addressing the issue of soil fertility, waste management and
reducing chemical fertiliser inputs, it continues to become a tool to social, ecological and economic
sustainability.
The Chuktia Bhunjia also follow the practice of crop rotation both in dehi and wet rice cultiva-
tion. The limited landholding, coupled with available seed diversity, although is found to enforce
them for crop rotation, their perception of plant being nutrient for other crops is other influential
factor for this practice. Therefore, particularly in aat, they grow paddies of short duration in one
year and millets in the next year. In the wet-land cultivation, they usually grow mung and chana
immediately after reaping paddies. It is believed that nutrient being used by paddies is a good nutri-
ent for the mung. Although the damp and moisture nature of the land is another factor for it. While
reaping mung and chana, they leave the root portion which is believed to have good nutrient value
and helpful for other paddies crops. So, by rotating the crops, they not only maintain the soil fertil-
ity but also help plant to grow sustainably, by nutrient cycling, towards producing good yield
(Huang et al., 2003). The studies on crops rotation also find that crop rotation is an effective
approach for carbon sequestration compared to non-rotated practice (Jarecki and Lal, 2003;
Raphael et al., 2016; Triberti et al., 2016), a potential practice to reduce the emissions of methane
(CH4) and other greenhouse gases in irrigated-rice fields (Theisen et al., 2017). According to
Cha-un et al. (2017), when rice was cultivated in rotation with corn and sweet sorghum in dry
season, there was a significant reduction in greenhouse gas emission by 68%–78% as compared to
double rice cultivation. Besides, the Chuktia Bhunjia are also found to maintain soil fertility
through rainwater harvesting method particularly in dehi cultivation, as an evidence from bunds
and mulching that are believed to reduce soil erosion and maintain soil fertility.
The cultural strand of Chuktia Bhunjia’s agriculture is revealed from the celebration of rituals
and festivals in each stage of agricultural practice. The narration about the ecologically driven
technology and symbolic form of agricultural tools and implements – plough and bullock made
during Chaitra festival – reveal that those technologies certainly have cultural and cosmological
association but are always cost-effective and economical because of easy and free availability. The
use of technology and associated ritualistic practices portrays that their agricultural practices are
not only ecological but also make them to sustainably harvest those forest materials used for agri-
cultural purpose whereby to ensure its existence for future generation (Nautiyal et al., 2007). They
have ritualistic attachment with those plant species that are used in preparation of agro-technology,
land boundaries and mulching whereby such agricultural practices become a tool towards eco-
sustainability. In other words, it can be said that the associated rituals among the Chuktia Bhunjia
have continued to help them to negotiate with the ecology and agricultural practices and becoming
a tool for climatic resilience; albeit, long-term observation, experience and association with land-
scape do have significant influence about climate and weather-led vulnerability to agricultural
production. Putting it shortly, the knowledge base of the Chuktia Bhunjia is becoming a resilience
strategy towards arresting the crop failure. However, the sustainability of food production through
these rituals is in question, owning to the climate change and socio-economic transformation of the
people in this community, their static culture and ritual based ethics of resource conservations are
assumed to have greater contribution towards agricultural sustainability. Gendered nature of
Sabar and Midya 15

Chuktia Bhunjia agriculture is clearly visible from the participation of both male and female in
agricultural practice, especially in plucking the seedling, transplantation and harvesting. The shar-
ing of labour in between families makes their agriculture economical and sustainable.
The analysis of traditional agriculture of the Chuktia Bhunjia indicates that they are not short
of innovation and observation. Certainly, their innovation and experience may not be called as
science in conventional sense rather than a special kind of science – a ‘localised science’. At
functional level, when the domains surrounding their agriculture – culture, knowledge and
experience – interact with each other through a ‘system’ of belief, it negotiates with the local
ecology and landscapes towards promoting sustainable agroecosystem through conserving soil,
ecology and ecological resources; and maintaining crop diversity even under the conditions of
water stress, limited resources and low level of technology. But the ban of shifting cultivation
inside SWS, particularly after the declaration of this sanctuary as ‘tiger project’, has not only
affected their agricultural knowledge but also forced many of them to adopt mechanised agricul-
ture whereby they had to change farming practices and adopt cash crop and hybrid seed varieties.
So, shift in the crops among the Chuktia Bhunjia is not always internal, that is, socio-economic
transformation, rather the change in climatic condition has forced few of them to adopt advanced
seed varieties (Batool et al., 2019; Bradshaw et al., 2004; Moniruzzaman, 2015; Ubisi et al.,
2019). The Chuktia Bhunjia Development Agency (CBDA) – a micro-project plan of government
of Odisha – is also trying to attract them towards conventional agriculture since its inception
through provisions of hybrid paddy distribution, cash crops cultivation, distribution of harvesting
machine, chemical fertilisers and so on; non-affordability, lack of knowledge on mechanized
agrotechnology and its management have enforced many of them to remain submissive to the
traditional agricultural practices.
There are two kinds of arguments pertaining to traditional agriculture. The ‘positivist reduc-
tionists’ who always support the conventionalism in every sphere including agriculture reject the
traditional knowledge-based agricultural practices because of their perception on traditional
knowledge being unscientific and difficult to feed the increasing population. They question if
their agriculture is sustainable, why are tribal people food insecure and always prone to malnu-
trition and starvation to death. There are ‘traditionalists’ who favour the traditional agriculture
because of its ecological value, climate resistant and sustainability of food, knowledge and cul-
ture; and response to the positivist reductionist in term of ‘lack of capability to purchase food
items’. The agricultural practices of the Chuktia Bhunjia fall in the second category and are
found to be a tool in negotiating with the ecology and livelihood. Their knowledge-based agri-
cultural practice is also assumed to provide them food sustainably and becoming a strategy
towards climate resistance and sustainable food security. Nevertheless, the agricultural practices
among them, coupled with the transformation of people due to state intervention and non-tribal
influence, are losing its originality. The successive agricultural policies too fail to recognise such
valuable knowledge whereby marginalised people like the Chuktia Bhunjia have always been
prone to food vulnerability. Therefore, given the ecological implication and livelihood of the
traditional agriculture, owing to its marginalisation at policy level, any attempt to encourage
poor tribal farmers like the Chuktia Bhunjia or to integrate their knowledge with modern scien-
tific knowledge can help them to survive sustainably because capitalistic model of agriculture
cannot always solve the problem of food vulnerability of tribal communities rather than linking
it with market economy.

Funding
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.
16 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

ORCID iDs
Bhubaneswar Sabar https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9332-110X
Dipak K. Midya https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9028-3504

References
Altieri MA (1999) Applying agroecology to enhance the productivity of peasant farming systems in Latin
America. Environment, Development and Sustainability 1(3): 197–217.
Basdew M, Jiri O and Mafongoya PL (2017) Integration of indigenous and scientific knowledge in climate adap-
tation in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems 3(1): 56–67.
Batool N, Shah SA, Dar SN, et al. (2019) Rainfall variability and dynamics of cropping pattern in Kashmir
Himalayas: a case study of climate change and agriculture. SN Applied Sciences 1: 606.
Behera HC (2021) Traditional agriculture, culture and the indigenous knowledge (IK) among the Kondhs in
Odisha, India. Journal of Huma Ecology 73(1–3): 44–55.
Bradshaw B, Dollan H and Smit B (2004) Farm-level adaptation to climate variability and change: crop diver-
sification in the Canadian prairies. Climate Change 67: 119–141.
Brodt SB (2001) A systems perspective on the conservation and erosion of indigenous agricultural knowledge
in Central India. Human Ecology 29(1): 99–120.
Cernea M (2005) Studying the culture of agri-culture: the uphill battle for social research in CGIAR. Culture
and Agriculture 27(2): 73–87.
Chamber R (1980) Understanding professional: small farmers and scientists. Occasional Paper, International
Agricultural Development Service, New York.
Charles E, Kalanda M, Ngongondo C, et al. (2014) Assessing indigenous knowledge systems and climate
change adaptation strategies in agriculture: a case study of Chagaka Village, Chikhwawa, Southern
Malawi. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 67–69: 164–172.
Cha-un N, Chidthaisong A, Yagi K, et al. (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration and crop
yields in a rain-fed rice field with crop rotation management. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment
237: 109–120.
Cleveland DA (1998) Balancing on a planet: toward an agricultural anthropology for the twenty-first century.
Human Ecology 26(2): 323–340.
Crevello S (2004) Dayak land use system and indigenous knowledge. Journal of Human Ecology 16(2):
69–73.
Dialla BF (1994) The adaptation of soil conservation in Burkino Faso. Indigenous Knowledge and Development
Monitor 2(1): 10–12.
Fernandez PG (1994) Indigenous seed practices for sustainable agriculture. Indigenous Knowledge and
Development Minotor 2(2): 9–12.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2011) Facts and figures: people and forests.
Available at: http://www.fao.org/forestry/28811/en/
Fließbach A, Oberholzer HR, Gunst L, et al. (2007) Soil organic matter and biological soil quality indica-
tors after 21 years of organic and conventional farming. Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment 118(1):
273–284.
Forte A, Fagnano M and Fierro A (2017) Potential role of compost and green manure amendment to
mitigate soil GHGs emissions in Mediterranean drip irrigated maize production systems. Journal of
Environmental Management 192: 68–78.
Ge Y, Zhang JB, Zhang LM, et al. (2008) Long-term fertilization regimes affect bacterial community struc-
ture and diversity of an agricultural soil in Northern China. Journal of Soils Sediments 8: 43–50.
Government of India (2013) Statistical Profile of Scheduled Tribes in India. Government of India: Ministry
of Tribal Affairs, Statistical Division.
Haverkort B (1995) Agricultural development with a focus on local resources: ILEIA’S view on indig-
enous knowledge. In: Warren DM, Slikkerveer LJ and Brokensha D (eds) The Cultural Dimension
of Development: Indigenous Knowledge System. London: Intermediate Technology Publication,
pp.454–457.
Sabar and Midya 17

Howes M and Chambers R (1980) Indigenous technological knowledge: analysis, implication and issues. In:
Brokensha D, Warren D and Werner O (eds) Indigenous Knowledge Systems and Development. Lanham,
MD: University Press of America, pp.329–340.
Hu F, Feng F, Zhao C, et al. (2017) Integration of wheat-maize intercropping with conservation practices
reduces CO2 emissions and enhances water use in dry areas. Soil & Tillage Research 169: 44–53.
Huang M, Shao M, Zhang L, et al. (2003) Water use efficiency and sustainability of different long-term crop
rotation systems in the Loess Plateau of China. Soil & Tillage Research 72(1): 95–104.
Jarecki MK and Lal R (2003) Crop management for soil carbon sequestration. Critical Review in Plant
Sciences 22(6): 471–502.
Jeeve SRDN, Laloo RC and Mishra BP (2006) Traditional agricultural practices in Meghalaya, Northeast
India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 5(1): 7–18.
Kala CP, Dollo M, Farooquee NA, et al. (2008) Land use management and wet-rice cultivation (Jebi-Aji) by
the Apatani people in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Outlook on Agriculture 37(2): 125–130.
Kumar AK (2010) Local knowledge and agricultural sustainability: a case study of Pradhan tribe in Adilabad
district. Working paper No. 81. Hyderabad, India: CESS.
Kumar V (2014) Role of indigenous knowledge in climate change adaptation strategies: a study with special
reference to North-Western India. Journal of Geography & Natural Disasters 5(1): 1–5.
Lasco RD, Delfino RJP, Catacutan DC, et al. (2014) Climate risk adaptation by smallholder farmers: the roles
of trees and agroforestry. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6: 83–88.
Lin BB (2011) Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: adaptive management for environmental
change. Bioscience 61(3): 183–193.
Liu Y, Duan M and Yu Z (2013) Agricultural landscapes and biodiversity in China. Agriculture, Ecosystem
& Environment 166: 46–54.
McCorkle C (1989) Towards a knowledge of local knowledge and its importance for agricultural RD&E.
Agriculture and Human Value 3(3): 4–12.
Mader P, Fliessbach A, Dubois D, et al. (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science
296(5573): 1694–1697.
Magdoff F and Weil RR (2004) Soil organic matter management strategies. In: Magdoff F and Weil R (eds)
Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp.45–65.
Matocha J, Schroth G, Hills T, et al. (2012) Integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation through
agroforestry and ecosystem conservation. In: Nair PKR and Garrity D (eds) Agroforestry – The Future
of Global Land Use. Dordrecht: Springer, pp.105–126.
Mbow C, Van Noordwijk M, Luedeling E, et al. (2014) Agroforestry solutions to address food security and
climate change challenges in Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 6: 61–67.
Mehta CM, Uma P, Franke-Whittle IH, et al. (2014) Compost: its role, mechanism and impact on reducing
soil-borne plant diseases. Waste Management 34(3): 607–622.
Mini PV (2005) Traditional agricultural practices of Mavilans of Kerala. Man and Life 31(3/4): 47–52.
Misra S, Dhyani D and Maikhuri RK (2008) Sequestering carbon through indigenous agriculture practices.
Leisa India 10(4): 21–22.
Moniruzzaman S (2015) Crop choice as climate change adaptation: evidence from Bangladesh. Ecological
Economics 118: 90–98.
Mushagalusa GN, Ledent JF and Draye X (2008) Shoot and root competition in potato/maize intercropping:
effects on growth and yield. Environmental and Experimental Botany 64: 180–188.
Nair PR, Nair VD, Kumar BM, et al. (2009) Soil carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems: a
feasibility appraisal. Environmental Science & Policy 12(8): 1099–1111.
Nautiyal S, Kaechele H, Rao KS, et al. (2007) Energy and economic analysis of traditional versus introduced
crops cultivation in the mountains of the Indian Himalayas: a case study. Energy 32(12): 2321–2335.
Netting RM (1993) Smallholders‚ Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive‚ Sustainable
Agriculture. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Ning C, Qu J, He L, et al. (2017) Improvement of yield, pest control and Si nutrition of rice by rice-water
spinach intercropping. Field Crops Research 208: 34–43.
18 Journal of Asian and African Studies 00(0)

Nyong A, Adesina F and Elasha BO (2007) The value of indigenous knowledge in climate change mitigation
and adaptation strategies in the African Sahel. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
12(5): 787–797.
Ota AB, Mohanty BN and Mohanty SC (2020) Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups of Odisha.
Bhubaneswar, India: SC&STRTI.
Paul C, Weber M and Knoke T (2017) Agroforestry versus farm mosaic systems: comparing land-use effi-
ciency, economic returns and risks under climate change effects. Science of the Total Environment 587:
22–35.
Rajasekaran B and Whiteford MB (1992) Rice-crab production system: the role of indigenous knowledge in
designing food security policies. Food Policy 18(3): 237–247.
Raphael JP, Calonego JC, Milori DMB, et al. (2016) Soil organic matter in crop rotations under no-till. Soil
& Tillage Research 155: 45–53.
Rechards P (1989) Indigenous agricultural knowledge system and international agricultural research. In:
Rechards P, Slikkerveer LJ and Phillips AO (eds) Indigenous Knowledge System for Agriculture and
Rural Development. The CIKARD Inaugural Lecture, Studies in Technology and Social Change No. 13.
Ames, IA: Iowa State University, pp.4–18.
Rhoades RE (1983) Breaking New Ground: Agricultural Anthropology. Lima, Peru: International Potato
Center.
Richards P (1993) Cultivation: knowledge or performance? In: Hobart M (ed.) An Anthropological Critique
of Development: The Growth of Ignorance. London: Routledge, pp.61–78.
Russell RV and Hiralal RB (1916) Tribe and Caste of the Central Provinces of India. London: McMillan.
Sauerborn J, Sprich H and Mercer-Quarshie H (2000) Crop rotation to improve agricultural production in
Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Sciences 184: 67–72.
Schoeneberger M, Bentrup G, De Gooijer H, et al. (2012) Branching out: agroforestry as a climate change
mitigation and adaptation tool for agriculture. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 67(5): 128A–
136A.
Shava S, O’Donoghue R, Krasny ME, et al. (2009) Traditional food crops as a source of community resilience
in Zimbabwe. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies 4(1): 31–48.
Singh A (2000) Use of indigenous knowledge and social networking in resource management: a case study in
sustainable development from Kwajulu Natal. Journal of Social Science 4(1): 47–56.
Soleri D and Cleveland DA (1993) Hopi crop diversity and change. Journal of Ethnobiology 13(2): 203–031.
Soropa G, Gwatibaya S, Musiyiwa K, et al. (2015) Indigenous knowledge system weather forecasts as a cli-
mate change adaptation strategy in smallholder farming systems of Zimbabwe: case study of Murehwa,
Tsholotsho and Chiredzi districts. African Journal of Agricultural Research 10(10): 1067–1075.
Talawar S and Singh YP (1994) Understanding indigenous knowledge system in arid agriculture. Journal of
Rural Development 13(1): 63–74.
Theisen G, Silva JJC, Silva JS, et al. (2017) The birth of a new cropping system: towards sustainability in the
sub-tropical lowland agriculture. Field Crops Research 212: 82–94.
Triberti L, Nastri A and Baldoni G (2016) Long-term effects of crop rotation, manure and mineral fertilisation
on carbon sequestration and soil fertility. European Journal of Agronomy 74: 47–55.
Tripathi A and Singh GS (2013) Perception, anticipation and responses of people to changing climate in the
Gangetic Plain of India. Current Science 105: 1673–1684.
Ubisi NR, Kolanisi U and Jiri O (2019) The role of indigenous knowledge systems in rural smallholder farm-
ers’ response to climate change: case study of Nkomazi local municipality, Mpumalanga, South Africa.
Journal of Asian and African Studies 55(2): 273–284.
Verchot LV, Van Noordwijk M, Kandji S, et al. (2007) Climate change: linking adaptation and mitigation
through agroforestry. Migration and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 12(5): 901–918.
Warren DM and Rajasekaran B (1993) Putting local knowledge to good use. International Agricultural
Development 13(4): 8–10.
Warren MD, Slikkerveer LJ and Titilola SO (eds) (1989) Indigenous knowledge system: implication for agri-
culture and international development. Studies in technologies and social change No. 11. Ames, IA:
Iowa State University.
Sabar and Midya 19

Zhang FS and Li L (2003) Using competitive and facilitative interactions in intercropping systems enhances
crop productivity and nutrient use efficiency. Plant & Soil 248: 305–312.
Zhang QC, Shamsi IH, Xu DT, et al. (2012) Chemical fertilizer and organic manure inputs in soil exhibit a
vice versa pattern of microbial community structure. Applied Soil Ecology 57: 1–8.
Zomer RJ, Neufeldt H, Xu J, et al. (2016) Global tree cover and biomass carbon on agricultural land: the
contribution of agroforestry to global and national carbon budgets. Scientific Reports 6: 29987.

Author biographies
Bhubaneswar Sabar is a PhD Research Scholar in the Department of Anthropology, Vidyasagar University,
Midnapore, West Bengal, India. He also works as Assistant Professor in the Department of Anthropology and
Tribal Studies, Maharaja Sriram Chandra Bhanja Deo University (Erstwhile North Orissa University),
Baripada, Odisha. His academic interests include tribal studies, public policy, ecological anthropology, and
critical ethnography. He has published a number of research papers in peer-reviewed journals, besides author
of a book titled Food Insecurity, Coping Strategies and Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (2015). As one
of the recipients of Endeavour Research Fellowship, 2012 and Adivasi Fellowship, he was affiliated to the
University of Sydney, Australia and London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), University of
London respectively.
Prof. Dipak K. Midya is a Professor of Anthropology at Department of Anthropology, Vidyasagar University,
Midnapore, West Bengla, India. His academic interests include indigenous people, ethnic identity, tribal
problems and maoist violence. Having guided Ph.D students, he has undertaken many research projects in the
areas of extremism, ethnic unrest, health and marginality. He has authored 04 books and published articles in
the journal of international reputation including Journal of Indian Anthropological Society, Journal of the
Anthropological Survey of India, Man in India, Summerhill: IIAS Review, etc.