Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Do you believe that the project submission is the student’s own Yes/No
work? If No: Please contact Module Leader to arrange a viva
Please indicate your qualitative judgement on the project outcome by circling the appropriate
phrase:
OR
Referral in: (i) project (ii) viva (iii) project and viva
Signature of marker:
ENGM123 Marking form (March 2023) 2 of
4
Research/Literature Review.
Assimilation and dissemination of relevant research.
Critical assessment and use of the sources.
Range of references cited.
Quality of references
cited.
Application of this review to the practical elements of the project.
Summation of research findings and linkage to empirical research
Reference list in Harvard style and complete.
Project / Dissertation
1 page abstract. summarising the achievements of the project. Level of written English.
Introduction to the problem, scope and link with the Research Plan
The main body of the report considers relevant elements.
Level of structured presentation and evidence of logical thinking
Quality of academic writing and clarity
The research methodology/approach adopted
Citations used throughout dissertation are supportive of assertions and in Harvard style
Conclusion: critical assessment of the process & outcome of the project.
Where the project is judged to be a below standard use this sheet to identify the
deficiencies and give guidance to the students on what needs to be done to bring the
work up to standard.
ENGM123 Marking form (March 2023) 4 of
4