Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Water-saving technologies:
1. Alternate wetting and drying (AWD)
2. Saturated soil culture (SSC)
Results in reduced water losses, but yield decline with current
lowland varieties.
With the decreasing water resources and increasing rice demand
from the growing population, agriculture is faced with a challenge to
produce more rice while using less water
Aerobic rice Traditional flooded rice
2.1 Synthesis
2. MATERIALS A. Terminology
Developing management
recommendations that maximize the
yield potential and WP of aerobic
rice
2.1.1 Terminology
• Treatment Factors: water management schemes, level of nitrogen
application, row spacing, type of establishment, irrigation
methods, ground cover type
• Non-treatment Factors: naturally occurring pests, micro-nutrient
imbalances
• Site Characteristics: agro-meteorological conditions,
groundwater table, soil type
• Notation: experiment + year,season + location (ex. WxN 2004DS
Dapdap)
2.1.2 Location and Design of Experiments
Equation 1:
WPIR = Y/I
where
WPIR – the water productivity with respect to irrigation and rainfall (kg/m3)
Y - grain yield (kg/ha)
I - water input from irrigation and rainfall (m3/ha)
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was done to determine significant
differences in yield and WPIR between treatment factors.
CropStat v. 7.2
• Provides balanced analysis of variance for split-plot designs
• Data was imported from Excel files containing yield and WPIR for
each treatment and repetition
Table 1. Calculation of LSD values per type of comparison
Type of comparison Least Significant Difference at 0.05
probability level
Two main plot means (averaged
over all sub-plot treatments) 2𝐸𝑎
𝑇𝑎 ×
𝑟×𝑏
Ea= error a (MS), Eb= error b (MS), r = no. of replications, a = no. of main-plot treatments, b = no. of
sub-plot treatments
T-values: obtained from tabular T-values using n (degrees of freedom) of error A and error B.
2.2 Suitability 2.2 Suitability mapping
Analysis A. Study Area
B. Data collection and
processing
C. Suitability analysis
Study Area
Oriental Mindoro Province
• Rich and arable land
suitable for agriculture
• Has high potential for
aerobic rice
• Around 20,000 ha of land is
cultivated for upland rice
Table 2. Source of spatial data used for suitability
mapping
• Source: BSWM, DA
• Vector shapefile soil textural class per polygon
• Raster conversion
• Reclassified: freely-draining soils have higher suitability
Table 3. Suitability factors in identifying rainfed areas for aerobic rice
Factor Weight (%) Description Suitability
Scale
4-month clustered 40 900 to 1300 3
rainfall (mm)
>1300 2
700 to 900 1
<700 0
Average monthly 25 28 to 32 3
temperature (°C)
22 to 28 2
15 to 22 1
Suitability Criteria
<15 0
Soil texture 20 Sand, sandy loam, loamy sand 3
3 to 8 2
8 to 13 1
>13 0
Land use CONSTRAINT Arable, grassland, perennial 1
crops
0
Built up areas, forests, inland
waters
4-month clustered
Reclassified slope
baseline rainfall
map
map
Land use
constraint map
Average mean
Reclassified
Data collection, monthly
temperature map Raster calculator
Start processing and temperature map
analysis Weighted overlay
overlay
Soil texture map
Reclassified soil
of Oriental
texture map
Mindoro
Raster conversion
Suitability map for
tropical aerobic rice
Slope map of Reclassified in Oriental Mindoro
Oriental Mindoro rainfall map
End
Figure 1. Process flow for the generation of suitable rainfed areas for tropical aerobic rice in Oriental Mindoro
Table 4. Suitability factors in identifying rainfed areas for aerobic rice
Factor Weight (%) Description Suitability
Scale
Proximity from 40 >2000 m 3
point of diversion
1500 to 2000 2
500 to 1500 1
<500 0
Soil texture 30 Sand, sandy loam, loamy sand 3
Suitability Criteria
Clay, silty clay, clay loam,
sandy clay 1
Slope (%) 30 0 to 3 3
3 to 8 2
8 to 13 1
>13 0
Existing Irrigable CONSTRAINT
area
Raster conversion
End
Figure 2. Process flow for the generation of target irrigated areas for tropical aerobic rice in Oriental Mindoro
3.1 Synthesis
Nitrogen Level
yield
E X P E R IM EN T NS N -S P L I T GRAIN
Y I E L D,
T/HA Notes
• NS4 had the highest biomass during
NSxR 2004WS NS1 0-30-30-30-10 3.90 mid-tillering
PhilRice NS2 0-20-50-30-0 3.48
• N-split had no significant effects on
NS3 0-20-30-50-0 3.51
NS4 23-23-29-25-0 3.24 yield
NS5 18-0-29-43-10 3.36 • Split of 23-23-29-25-0 had lowest
mean yields
NSxR 2005WS NS1 0-30-30-30-10 6.10 • Split of 0-30-30-30-10 consistently
PhilRice NS2 0-20-50-30-0 5.80 had the highest yields
NS3 0-20-30-50-0 5.69
NS4 23-23-29-25-0 5.40
NS5 18-0-29-43-10 6.10
Row spacing
Table 7. Effect of row spacing on grain yield of
aerobic rice
E X P E R IM EN T S E E D IN G M E T H O D GRAIN Notes:
Y I E L D, • Establishment method does not
T/HA seem to have any effect on
performance of aerobic rice
ExV 2005DS Drum seeding 3.30 a • Drum seeding and hand row
PhilRice Hand row seeding 3.27 a
seeding should be preferred
Broadcast 3.60 a
E X P E R IM EN T I R R I G AT I ON TWI, GRAIN W P IR ,
MM Y I E L D, KG / M 3
T/HA
Notes:
• Sprinkler irrigation provides: less water losses, uniform distribution and suitable
for sandy soils
Ground cover
Table 10. Grain yield under varying irrigation methods
E X P E R IM EN T GROUND GRAIN W P IR ,
COV E R Y I E L D, KG / M 3
T/HA
Notes:
• Ground covers have significant effects on yield and water productivity
• Rice straw is mulch is the best option
Variety
Apo (PSB-Rc-9):
• First-generation aerobic rice variety
• 115-day rice
• Consistent yields: 5 to 6 t ha-1
• Can tolerate prolonged droughts (3.5 t ha-1)
• Requires 600-1080 mm of water
Variety
Magat PSB-Rc-80