3) a) We didn’t get the same results

b)Yes some people . considered the number of people where as some people considered whether
the sides had women or children

c)

d) Maybe MIT is using the data we input to train AI models for future scenarios

e) I personally think there should be a case by case approach when it comes to ethics.

4) In the relentless pace of technological progress, it is not possible to ignore the symbiotic
relationship between the expansion of technology and the rise of ethical questions that accompany
it. As our world is becoming increasingly interconnected, driven by innovations ranging from artificial
intelligence to biotechnology, the ethical implications of these advances are becoming more
pronounced, and it is therefore necessary to reflect on the profound impact technology has on
society.

It cannot be denied that the ever-increasing nature of technology brings with it a series of ethical
challenges. As our ability to manipulate fundamental aspects of life, information, and
communication is growing, so are the questions of how we should use this new power responsibly.
For example, in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), machines are endowed with the ability to learn,
reason and make decisions. The prospect of autonomous systems raises ethical concerns about
accountability, transparency and bias. Who is responsible if an artificial intelligence (AI) makes a
morally consequential decision? How can we ensure that these systems do not perpetuate existing
prejudice? These questions highlight an ethical tightrope that we are walking as technology
advances.

In addition, the persistent pursuit of innovation often outpaces the development of ethical
frameworks to guide its application. The rapid evolution of technology can cause lawmakers,
policymakers, and society as a whole to struggle to catch up with them. This lack of ethical
considerations can lead to unintended consequences, as has been demonstrated in debates on
issues such as data privacy, cyber security and the ethical use of emerging technologies. The ethical
vacuum created by this disconnect threatens our ability to ensure that technology complies with our
values and societal norms.

The interconnectedness of our global society further intensifies the ethical dilemmas that
technology creates. The digital age has given rise to unprecedented connectivity that allows
information to flow across borders at an unprecedented rate. While this connectivity has enormous
benefits, it also raises ethical dilemmas related to cultural sensitivity, information control and digital
sovereignty. How do we reconcile the universality of technology with the diversity of ethical values
in different societies? In order to strike the right balance, we need a delicate understanding of the
complex interplay between technology and culture.
When we deal with these ethical dilemmas, it is clear that the responsibility for navigating the
ethical landscape of technology extends beyond developers and engineers and encompasses
broader society. Ethical considerations must be an integral part of the design and deployment of
technology and a common effort must be made to ensure equal distribution of the benefits of
innovation.

6) Object: Atomic bomb

The selection of the Atomic Bomb as an object is particularly appropriate for exploring the ethical
obligations associated with knowledge. The development and use of atomic weapons during World
War II brought about a new era in human history, but it is not possible to ignore the profound ethical
implications of the creation and deployment of such destructive knowledge.

The Manhattan project, which led to the creation of the atomic bomb, involved brilliant scientists
such as Robert Oppenheimer, who were trying to find new knowledge in the field of nuclear science.
However, the question arises as to whether the possession of such knowledge entails ethical
obligations for those who acquire it? The atomic bomb, as a tangible manifestation of scientific
discovery, reminds us of the moral responsibilities associated with the acquisition of certain
knowledge.

The scientists involved in the Manhattan Project faced an ethical dilemma: their knowledge had the
potential to cause unparalleled destruction. The decision to use this knowledge in warfare has
profound consequences and raises questions about the ethical obligations of scientists, politicians,
and society as a whole. The bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki not only ended the war, but also
left a lasting moral burden on those who contributed to the development of atomic weapons.

In this case, the object becomes a powerful symbol of the dual nature of knowledge: its ability to
bring about both progress and destruction. Ethical obligations related to the knowledge of the
Atomic Bomb extend beyond the scientific community and beyond a wider global society. The long-
lasting legacy of this knowledge requires us to reflect on the ethical responsibilities associated with
the acquisition and use of knowledge, which have profound and profound consequences.

5) a) Distinguishing a reaction from a decision is crucial because it draws a line between instinctual,
spontaneous responses and intentional, premeditated choices. Technology, especially in the field of
self-driving cars, has made this distinction necessary due to the need for programming algorithms to
make decisions in complex scenarios. Unlike human reactions, these algorithms have been designed,
which means that they involve a deliberate choice made by programmers. This distinction is crucial
because it raises ethical questions about responsibility and intention in situations where the
outcome of an algorithm's decision can have significant consequences.

b) The statement “programming cars based on what may be the conditions in the future looks more
like premeditated homicide” draws attention to the ethical challenges posed by self-driving car
algorithm decisions. This analogy suggests that pre-programmed decisions made by algorithms can
be regarded as intentional actions rather than spontaneous reactions. Although it may be a
provocative statement, it highlights the ethical responsibility associated with autonomous systems
programming. If one agrees with the statement, it depends on his or her perspective on the
intentionality of programming decisions and the ethical implications of foreseeing potential damage
in the future.

c) Designing algorithms to organize and decide how cars react to specific situations raises critical
ethical questions about who should be responsible for making these decisions. Determining how
algorithms prioritize and respond to different scenarios involves moral considerations that go
beyond technical knowledge. The decision on how these algorithms should be written should involve
input from a wide range of stakeholders, including ethicists, policymakers, engineers and
representatives of the communities affected. It is necessary to work together to establish ethical
guidelines that reflect societal values and ensure that the deployment of autonomous technology is
consistent with ethical standards and legal frameworks.